Swales (1990) defines genre as "a class of communicative events, the members of which share some set of
communicative purposes." His definition offers the basic idea that there are certain conventions or rules which
are generally associated with a writer's purpose. For example, personal letters tell us about (their writers') private
stories, film reviews analyze movies for potential viewers, and police reports describe what happened in a crime.
Most genres use conventions related to communicative purposes; a personal letter starts with a cordial question
in a friendly mood because its purpose is to maintain good relationships with friends, and an argument essay
emphasizes its thesis since it aims at making an argument (Kim & Kim, 2005).
Swales (1990) and Martin (1984), as cited in Kay and Dudley-Evans (1998), share an essential viewpoint that
all genres control a set of communicative purposes within certain social situations and that each genre has its
own structural quality according to those communicative purposes. Hence, the communicative purposes and the
structural features should be identified when genres are used in writing classes.
The structural features that genres are made up of include both standards of organization structure and linguistic
features. Standards of organizational structure refer to how the text is sequenced. For instance, Hammond (1992),
as cited in Paltridge (1996), describes the common organizational structure in a formal letter which purpose is
to file a complaint and suggest a proper action to solve the problem as follows: "sender's address, receiver's
address, greetings, identification of complaint, justification of complaint, demand action, sign-off, and sender's
name."
Common sets of linguistic features can constitute a text type. Text type is defined by Biber (1988), as cited in
Paltridge (1996), as a class of texts having similarities in linguistic forms regardless of the genres. The phrase
'text type' is a way of classifying and defining different types of language interaction both spoken and written. It
refers to the purpose of a text and the way it is written. Text types may be classified as instruction, explanation,
recounts, information reports, exposition, and narrative. In considering a text, one has to think about its context,
(i.e., topic, purpose, and audience) and language, (i.e., text structure, grammatical features, and vocabulary). For
example, Hammond (1992), cited in Paltridge (1996), examines the characteristics of several genres and
categorized them according to similarities in text types: recipes are known to have the text type of procedure,
personal letters are used to tell private anecdotes, advertisements deal with description, news articles have the
text type of recounting, scientific papers prefer passive voice over active voice in presenting reports and
academic papers are likely to have embedded clauses. This means that different text types integrate distinctive
knowledge and different sets of skills, so teachers should introduce a variety of genres to have students
understand and practice different sets of skills.
While these issues are considered by writing teachers, they cannot simply dismiss the fact that one of the most
serious challenges is that most of the students in their classes, particularly in tertiary level, consider to practice
a specific career that is why students weigh the importance of writing to their future profession. Consequently,
their idea of the role of writing to their field tends to influence their attitude towards learning of how to write.
Having this crisis at hand, Bizzell (1982) reminds the teachers that student writing in colleges and universities
should not be viewed solely as an individually-oriented, inner-directed cognitive process, but as much as an
acquired response to the discourse conventions which arise from preferred ways of creating and communicating
knowledge within their particular communities. In the same vein, if teaching of writing will be viewed from this
perspective, there will be small room for doubt that writing will be a meaningful task for the students and
gradually they will realize that it is more of a socially-situated act as Faigley and Hansen (1985) maintain. As
what they pointed out as primary research agenda for Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC):
If teachers of English are to offer courses that truly prepare students to write in other disciplines, they will have
to explore why those disciplines study certain subjects, why certain methods of inquiry are sanctioned, how the
conventions of a discipline shape a text in the discipline, how individual writers represent themselves in the text,
how a text is read and disseminated, and how one text influences subsequent texts. In short, teachers of English
will have to adopt a rhetorical approach to the study of writing in the disciplines, an approach that examines the
negotiation of meaning among writers, readers, and subject matters (Faigley and Hansen, 1985: 149 in Swales,
1990).