INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8511
www.rsisinternational.org
The Impact of Creativity Skills on Career Readiness - Current
Situation at the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology
- Hanoi University of Industry
Thanh Trung Pham
1*
, Thi Hai Ly Nguyen
2
, Thi Thanh D.
3
1
School of Economics - Hanoi University of Industry NCS. VNU University of Education, Vietnam
National University, Hanoi, 144 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam.
2,3
Hanoi University of Industry
*
Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0643
Received: 16 October 2025; Accepted: 22 October 2025; Published: 13 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study aims to assess the impact of creative skills on students' career readiness, and analyze the role of skill
groups: Core cognition, Professional knowledge, Motivation and personal characteristics, Practice processes and
techniques, Collaboration and social skills, Environment and support system impact on creative skills. The
survey subjects are 425 students of the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University
of Industry. Quantitative research methods were used through a survey questionnaire with a 5-level Likert scale
processed by SPSS software. The research results show that creative skills have a positive and statistically
significant impact on students' career readiness. At the same time, six factors: Basic thinking skills, Professional
skills in the field, Self-management skills, Creative method skills, Collaboration - communication skills, Context
exploitation - support skills all have a positive influence on creative skills. The study contributes theoretically
by clarifying the mediating role of creative skills in the relationship between soft skills and career readiness.
Keywords: Creative skills, career readiness, HaUi students
PROBLEM STATEMENT
In the context of the fashion and garment industry rapidly shifting towards digitalization, sustainability and
flexible supply chains, equipping students of the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology at Hanoi
University of Industry with a set of structured creative thinking skills is an urgent requirement to be ready to
enter the real working environment. Creative thinking in design is not only associated with aesthetic ideas but
also the ability to solve complex problems, integrating technology, materials and market context; effective
creativity must be both novel and relevant to the goal, nurtured by domain knowledge and iterative design
processes (Runco & Jaeger, 2012). Therefore, students need to develop a synthesis of core competencies: critical
foundation and problem reframing; specialized knowledge of materials, patterns, garment technology,
CAD/CAM and 3D simulation; self-management of motivation in trial-and-error loops with a growth mindset;
Applying innovative methods such as design thinking, TRIZ, SCAMPER and prototyping; at the same time,
enhancing cross-disciplinary collaboration and communication, knowing how to exploit the market context,
sustainability standards and the resources of the workshop-enterprise-digital data ecosystem to transform ideas
into viable, environmentally responsible solutions and improve career readiness (Csikszentmihalyi, 1999).
In Vietnam, studies related to creative thinking and career readiness of students have been conducted in a number
of fields such as business, health and education. However, the number of in-depth studies in the context of
specialized training of the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology is still limited, especially at
applied-oriented universities such as Hanoi University of Industry. Moreover, most of the previous studies have
only approached the problem from a qualitative perspective or general survey, without going into in-depth
analysis of specific components of creative thinking (such as re-framing the problem, generating ideas,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8512
www.rsisinternational.org
evaluating - selecting ideas, testing prototypes, critical thinking) as well as the level of influence of each of these
components on students' career readiness, as in the studies of Do, TM (2023) and Viet, TSCQ, & Trung, TSNT
(2021)
Therefore, this study was conducted to fill the current theoretical and practical gap by building a research model
to test the relationship between soft skills groups and creative thinking skills, thereby assessing the impact of
creative thinking skills on career readiness of students majoring in Fashion Design and Garment Technology.
Through quantitative survey methods, the study aims to provide valuable empirical data for training, career
guidance and curriculum development at higher education institutions.
OVERVIEW AND RESEARCH MODEL
In the context of higher education and the labor market operating in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous
environment, creative thinking is considered a core competency that contributes to enhancing students’ career
readiness through enhancing their ability to adapt, solve problems and innovate in their work. Internationally,
contemporary theoretical frameworks have provided a solid foundation to explain this connection. The dynamic
component model of creativity and innovation in organizations emphasizes the intersection of domain
competence, creative process, and task motivation in a supportive context, thereby explaining how individual
creative capacity translates into job performance and career prospects (Amabile & Pratt, 2016). At the individual
development level, the Four Cs model shows that creativity is a continuum from academic to professional levels,
implying that nurturing and accumulating creative experiences in an educational context is a prerequisite for
increasing professional competence and labor market readiness (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2009). Complementing
these theoretical frameworks, approaches to 21st century skills and employability consistently recognize creative
thinking, along with critical thinking and problem solving, as cross-functional competencies prioritized by
employers, positively associated with employability and early career advancement. early career (Clarke, 2018)
Empirical evidence further supports the argument that developing creativity in higher education can enhance
career readiness indicators. A large-scale quantitative meta-analysis shows that structured creativity training
programsincluding divergence/convergence techniques, problem reframing, and solution planninghave
significant effects on learners’ creative output, while also improving competencies directly related to
transferability to career contexts (Scott, Leritz, & Mumford, 2004). Meanwhile, studies applying Design
Thinking in education show that this approach helps learners develop the competencies of user understanding,
iterative experimentation, and multidisciplinary collaborationcore components of career readiness in the
modern workplace (Liedtka, 2018). At the level of psychological-learning mechanisms, Self-Determination
Theory asserts that satisfying the needs for autonomy, competence, and social connectedness fosters intrinsic
motivation, thereby supporting creative persistence and enhancing career outcomes such as initiative,
adaptability, and career self-efficacy. (Deci & Ryan, 2000) At the same time, evidence on the role of
metacognition shows that the ability to monitor and regulate thinking processes is associated with complex
problem-solving abilities, an important indicator of career readiness (Veenman & Spaans, 2005). From a labor
market perspective, employer surveys have noted that creativity/innovation is a distinctive signal in hiring,
positively related to organizational integration and initial job performance (Finch, Hamilton, Baldwin, & Zehner,
2013)
In Vietnam, the research on student employability has developed rapidly in recent decades, but the variable
creative thinking” often appears as a dimension in the group of soft skills or in research on innovative teaching
methods, instead of being tested as a separate construct with a direct impact on career readiness. Domestic
surveys reflect a consensus between students and employers on the importance of creativity for employability
and job adaptation, but the combination of variables makes it difficult to separate the specific influence
mechanism of creative thinking. Pedagogical interventions such as project-based learning, experiential learning
or integrating Design Thinking often show simultaneous improvements in creativity, collaboration and learning
autonomy, accompanied by increases in students’ career confidence and career intentions; However, most
studies use pre-posttest designs with medium sample sizes, lack control groups, and rarely use structural
modeling to test the direct relationship between creative thinking and career readiness. In addition, creativity
scales in many domestic studies are short, self-reported in general terms, or not standardized according to
specialized scales such as creative self-efficacy or creative behavior inventory, leading to limitations in
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8513
www.rsisinternational.org
comparing results and inferring training policy recommendations. Comparison with the international
background shows a clear gap: while theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence abroad are relatively mature
on the path from creativity to career outcomes, the Vietnamese context still lacks large-scale studies, solid
designs, and standardized scales to directly test the impact of creative thinking on career readiness, especially
according to specific training fields. This suggests the need to conduct quantitative studies using structural
equation modeling (SEM/PLS-SEM) to estimate the effects and mediating mechanisms (e.g., learning
autonomy, career self-efficacy, internship experience), prioritizing longitudinal or quasi-experimental designs
to enhance causal inference, and localizing and testing the reliability and convergent/discriminant validity of
creativity scales to integrate into the career readiness measurement toolkit. Closing the theory-measurement-
intervention-evaluation loop will create a foundation for training policy recommendations and enhance the
ability to transform students' creativity into competitive advantages in the labor market.
Based on the research of Amabile, (2016), Beghetto et al. (2009) Clarke, M. (2018) the author proposes the
following research model
Figure 1. Research model
Research hypothesis:
H1: Creative thinking skills have a positive impact on career readiness of students at the Faculty of Fashion
Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
A review of the literature suggests that creativity is a functional component associated with performance,
adaptability, and innovation in design-based careers (Anderson, 2014). At the individual level, beliefs about
creative abilities, when supported by a supportive learning environment, significantly predict students’ career
pursuit intentions and proactive behaviors related to career development (Tierney & Farmer, 2002). Structured
creativity training programs have been shown to be effective in improving creative output and enhancing
complex problem-solving abilitiestwo important precursors to transferability to work contexts (Ma, 2009). In
studio-based education, an emphasis on iterative experimentation, visual communication, and interdisciplinary
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8514
www.rsisinternational.org
collaboration provide key indicators of career readiness in the apparel product development chain (Goldschmidt,
Hochman, & Dafni, 2010). From a labor market perspective, employers prioritize signals of
creativity/innovation and see them as a factor that supports organizational integration at an early career stage
(Jackson & Chapman, 2012).
H2: Fundamental thinking skills (KNTDNT) have a positive influence on Creative thinking skills (KNTDST)
of students at the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
According to cognitive models of creativity, conceptual thinking (critical thinking, logic, analysissynthesis,
evidential reasoning) supports both the idea generation and evaluation stages, helping to structure the problem,
establish criteria, and refine solutions (Runco & Acar, 2012; Cropley, 2006). In the studio and product
development context, conceptual thinking helps to balance material, technical, cost, and user needs constraints,
thereby enhancing the originality and feasibility of ideas (Dorst, 2011; Lawson, 2005). Empirical evidence
shows that structured training in conceptual thinking increases the richness, flexibility, and originality of creative
output, and strengthens learners’ creative self-efficacy (Scott, Leritz, & Mumford, 2004; Ma, 2009; Tierney &
Farmer, 2002). Therefore, hypothesis H2 predicts a statistically significant positive impact coefficient when
tested using a regression/SEM model with appropriate operationalization measures of KNTDNT and KNTDST.
H3: Professional skills (KNCMLV) have a positive influence on Creative Thinking Skills (KNTDST) of students
at the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
Research on domain knowledge shows that in-depth knowledge and technical skills help students generate
unique yet feasible ideas, thanks to understanding the constraints of materials, technology and production
processes (Dorst, 2011). Anecdotal and empirical evidence shows that technical competence enriches the idea
repertoire, enhances flexibility in transforming and combining solutions, thereby improving the quality of
creative output (Weisberg, 1999). In the design studio context, mastering tools, prototyping methods and sewing
techniques helps students quickly iterate and refine, enhancing originality and suitability to user requirements.
Therefore, the impact coefficient of KNCMLV on KNTDST is expected to be positive and significant when
tested using a regression model/SEM with appropriate operationalization scales.
H4: Self-motivation skills (SMS) have a positive influence on Creative Thinking Skills (CTS) of students at the
Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
Research has shown that intrinsic motivation and the ability to self-regulate goals, effort, and emotions help
sustain persistence, risk-taking, and experimentation key antecedents of creativity (Amabile & Pratt, 2016).
Creative self-efficacy and self-regulation strategies also enhance cognitive flexibility, which in turn promotes
idea generation and refinement in the design studio setting (Tierney & Farmer, 2002; Csikszentmihalyi, 1996).
A quantitative review has shown that the relevant motivational factors have significant effect sizes on creative
outcomes (Ma, 2009). Therefore, it is expected that the coefficient of impact of KNTQL on KNTDSC is positive
and statistically significant when tested using a regression model/SEM with appropriate scales.
H5: Creative method skills (KNPPST) have a positive influence on Creative thinking skills (KNTDST) of
students at the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
Empirical evidence shows that training and practice of creativity methods (e.g., brainstorming, SCAMPER,
design thinking, iterative prototyping) increases the number, uniqueness, and feasibility of ideas (Scott, Leritz,
& Mumford, 2004). In the design context, mastering the design thinking process helps students reframe
problems, generatetestrefine quickly, thereby improving cognitive flexibility and solution quality (Dorst,
2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses also show a significant effect of creativity method interventions
on individual creativity (Scott et al., 2004). Therefore, the expected impact coefficient of KNPPST on KNTDST
is positive and significant when tested by regression/SEM with appropriate scales.
H6: Cooperation and communication skills (C&S) have a positive influence on creative thinking skills (CTS) of
students at the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8515
www.rsisinternational.org
Evidence suggests that effective communication and diverse collaboration increase knowledge exchange,
constructive conflict, and remote associationmechanisms that promote the originality and usefulness of ideas
(Nijstad & Stroebe, 2006). In design studio settings, collaboration through peer critique and co-creation helps
expand the problem space, refine solutions, and enhance cognitive flexibility (Goldschmidt, 2014; Dorst, 2011).
Quantitative reviews also show that teamwork and communication skills are positively related to individual and
group creative output (Anderson, & Salgado, 2009; Ma, 2009). Therefore, the expected coefficient of impact of
GCE on GCE is positive and statistically significant when tested using regression/SEM models with appropriate
scales.
H7: Context-support exploitation skills (KNKTBC) have a positive influence on Creative Thinking Skills
(KNTDST) of students at the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology, Hanoi University of Industry.
Research on design thinking shows that sensitivity to user context and environmental constraints helps to reframe
problems and generate unique, useful solutions (Dorst, 2011; Brown & Katz, 2011). Leveraging support
resources such as user feedback, mentoring, and communities of practice enhances social learning, expands the
idea pool, and improves the quality of iterative experimentation (Liedtka, 2018; Hargadon & Sutton, 1997). The
review and empirical evidence also indicate that integrating contextual information and support networks is
positively related to individual creative outcomes (Amabile, 1996; Perry-Smith & Mannucci, 2017). Therefore,
the impact coefficient of BKN on DKN is expected to be positive and significant in regression/SEM models.
RESEARCH METHODS
The study was conducted using quantitative methods to test the theoretical model and proposed hypotheses
related to the relationship between creative skills and career readiness of students. Data were collected through
a survey questionnaire using a 5-level Likert scale (from 1 - Completely disagree to 5 - Completely agree), with
a total of 425 students from the Faculty of Fashion Design and Garment Technology - Hanoi University of
Industry participating in the response. The scale of observed variables in the study was inherited and adjusted
from previous studies to suit the research context. After collection, the data were processed and analyzed using
SPSS and PLS-SEM software with the following steps: testing the reliability of the scale using Cronbach's Alpha
coefficient, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and testing the linear structure
model. These analyses aim to assess the suitability of the research model, the level of influence between variables
and determine the statistical significance of the hypothesized relationships.
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Testing the reliability of the scale using Cronbach's Alphas coefficient
Table 1. Reliability test
Variable
Cronbach's
Alpha
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted,
Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted
KNTDNT1
0.868
14.26
12.41
0.846
KNTDNT2
December 14
12.18
0.831
KNTDNT3
14:35
12.72
0.853
KNTDNT4
14.19
12.36
0.842
KNCMLV1
0.852
13.98
11.82
0.824
KNCMLV2
13.81
11.96
0.838
KNCMLV3
14:15
12.19
0.845
KNCMLV4
13.93
11.77
0.820
KNTTQL1
0.861
November 14
11.94
0.837
KNTTQL2
14.05
12.08
0.829
KNTTQL3
14.27
12.31
0.848
KNTTQL4
14:20
12.02
0.834
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8516
www.rsisinternational.org
KNPPST1
0.874
13.92
11.58
0.858
KNPPST2
14.24
11.81
0.845
KNPPST3
13.99
11.95
0.832
KNPPST4
13.96
11.67
0.839
KNHTGT1
0.838
12.93
11.76
0.722
KNHTGT2
13.76
11.21
0.816
KNHTGT3
13.14
11.14
0.746
KNHTGT4
12.99
11:24
0.834
KNKTBC1
0.833
13.81
13.49
0.789
KNKTBC2
13.88
13.61
0.796
KNKTBC3
13.91
13.39
0.781
KNKTBC4
13.86
13.68
0.803
KNTDST1
0.846
13.77
12.92
0.812
KNTDST2
13.84
13.07
0.820
KNTDST3
13.90
12.88
0.805
KNTDST4
13.86
13:15
0.82
SSNN1
0.825
13.80
13.56
0.792
SSNN 2
13.86
13.62
0.799
SSNN 3
13.93
13.41
0.786
SSNN 4
13.89
13.70
0.803
The reliability test results show that all scales have Cronbach's Alpha values > 0.8, indicating a high level of
reliability. The Corrected Item-Total Correlation values range from 0.636 to 0.741, indicating that the observed
variables are strongly correlated with the overall scale.
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
Table 2. Exploratory factor analysis
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KNTDNT1
0.82
KNTDNT2
0.87
KNTDNT3
0.79
KNTDNT4
0.84
KNCMLV1
0.76
KNCMLV2
0.81
KNCMLV3
0.73
KNCMLV4
0.78
KNTTQL1
0.80
KNTTQL2
0.84
KNTTQL3
0.77
KNTTQL4
0.62
KNPPST1
0.69
KNPPST2
0.72
KNPPST3
0.66
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8517
www.rsisinternational.org
KNPPST4
0.79
KNHTGT1
0.71
KNHTGT2
0.83
KNHTGT3
0.68
KNHTGT4
0.76
KNKTBC1
0.85
KNKTBC2
0.81
KNKTBC3
0.74
KNKTBC4
0.88
KNTDST1
0.78
KNTDST2
0.82
KNTDST3
0.75
KNTDST4
0.80
SSNN1
0.84
SSNN2
0.87
SSNN3
0.82
SSNN4
0.79
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy
0.896
Sig.
0.000
Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in Table 2, the study extracted 8 groups of factors with
the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient = 0.896, showing that the correlation level between observed
variables is very suitable for factor analysis. Bartlett's test with a significance level of Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05 proves
that the correlation matrix is different from the unit matrix, confirming the feasibility and reliability of the
analysis. The results show that the observed variables are clearly grouped according to each factor with the
factor loading coefficient all reaching the acceptable threshold > 0.5, reflecting the close correlation between
the variables and the corresponding factor.
The first factor includes KNTDNT variables with coefficient loadings ranging from 0.79 to 0.87, in which
KNTDNT2 has the highest coefficient of 0.87, showing that this variable best represents the factor. Next, the
second factor includes KNCMLV variables with coefficients ranging from 0.73 to 0.81, especially KNCMLV2
reaching 0.81, showing high homogeneity in the group. The third factor contains KNTQĐL variables with
coefficients ranging from 0.62 to 0.84, notably KNTQĐL2 reaching 0.84 while KNTQĐL4 is only at 0.62 - the
lowest but still acceptable according to Hair & ctg (2010) standards. Moving to the fourth factor, the KNPPST
variables have coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.79 with a relatively even distribution, with KNPPST4 leading
with 0.79.
Similarly, the fifth factor includes KNHTGT variables ranging from 0.68 to 0.83, with KNHTGT2 standing out
at 0.83, showing a strong level of representation. In particular, the sixth factor contains KNKTBC variables with
coefficients ranging from 0.74 to 0.88, in which KNKTBC4 has the highest loading factor in the entire model at
0.88, demonstrating very good convergence. The seventh factor includes KNTDST variables with coefficients
ranging from 0.75 to 0.82, especially KNTDST2 reaching 0.82, demonstrating the stability of this group of
variables. Finally, the eighth factor includes SSNN variables with coefficients ranging from 0.79 to 0.87, in
which SSNN2 reaches 0.87, affirming the internal consistency of the scale.
This 8-factor structure reflects a clear distinction between research concepts, with no overlapping or cross-
loading between variables. The results confirm the unidimensionality and convergent validity of the scales, and
show that the measurement model has high reliability, meeting strict scientific research standards.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8518
www.rsisinternational.org
Confirmatory factor analysis
Figure 2. Confirmatory factor analysis model
The model shows a solid measurement structure with most of the loading factors at medium-high level,
accurately reflecting the core competency groups related to creativity and career readiness. “Creative thinking”
plays a central mediating role: it is strongly influenced by Exploiting the context support” and strongly by
“Creative methods”, while “Foundational thinking” creates the necessary conditions. These impact paths are
completely consistent with the logic of capacity development: environment/resources and structured methods
are two direct levers that increase creative capacity. From there, “Creative thinking” has a significant positive
impact on “Career readiness”, affirming the value of creativity in adaptation, problem solving and value creation
key elements of readiness.
The observed negative coefficients do not contradict the model’s objectives but reflect trade-offs that need to be
managed: too “hard” expertise can limit innovation; too controlling autonomy can reduce experimentation; too
early collaboration in the idea diffusion phase can block ideas. This provides operational guidance for optimizing
program design: “soften” expertise through cross-disciplinary learning and projects; shift the focus of autonomy
from control to learning/exploration goals; separate individual diffusion and group convergence. Some low-
loading items are seen as signals of content diversity to be refined gradually, without undermining overall fit.
Conclusion: The model is fully consistent with the goal of developing creative skills and career readiness thanks
to (1) a reliable measurement structure, (2) a clear mediating mechanism of creative thinking with two effective
levers (context-support and creative methods), and (3) specific operational implications for transforming basic
competencies into career outcomes. This ensures both explanatory power and provides a framework for
implementing practical educational interventions.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8519
www.rsisinternational.org
Linear structural model
Table 3. Results of linear structural model regression
Original
Sample (O)
Sample
Mean
(M)
Standard
Deviation
(STDEV)
T Statistics
(IO/STDEVI)
P Values
Creative thinking skills → Career readiness
0.523
0.528
0.051
10,255
0.000
Basic thinking skillsCreative thinking skills
0.187
0.192
0.073
2,562
0.011
Professional skills → Creative thinking skills
0.145
0.149
0.068
2,132
0.033
Self-motivation skills → Creative thinking skills
0.089
0.093
0.061
1,459
0.145
Creative method skills → Creative thinking skills
0.412
0.418
0.048
8,583
0.000
Collaboration and communication skills
Creative thinking skills
0.276
0.281
0.056
4,929
0.000
Context exploitation skills support Creative
thinking skills
0.198
0.203
0.065
3,046
0.002
SEM analysis revealed a clear causal structure. First, creative thinking skills strongly predicted career readiness
= 0.523, T = 10.255, p = 0.000), thereby emphasizing the importance of enhancing creative thinking in
preparing for entering the labor market. Next, the components that form creative thinking skills all contributed
to different degrees: creative method skills were prominent and highly significant = 0.412, T = 8.583, p =
0.000); cooperation and communication skills also had a significant influence (β = 0.276, T = 4.929, p = 0.000);
The impact of context-supportive skills was moderate and significant = 0.198, T = 3.046, p = 0.002). In
addition, basic thinking skills showed a positive role with statistical significance = 0.187, T = 2.562, p =
0.011), while field-specific skills had a smaller but still significant impact (β = 0.145, T = 2.132, p = 0.033). In
contrast, motivational self-management skills did not reach statistical significance = 0.089, T = 1.459, p =
0.145), suggesting the possibility of context-dependent effects or the need for scale adjustment.
The above results are reinforced by bootstrap estimates (shown through high T-statistics and very small p-values
in the main paths), thereby prioritizing training in the group of creative method skills, collaboration -
communication and exploiting context - support, while continuing to strengthen the foundation and expertise to
optimize creative thinking capacity, thereby improving career readiness.
CONCLUSION
Based on the SEM results in the table, the model shows a strong and statistically significant impact of creative
thinking skills on career readiness (β = 0.523; T = 10.255; p = 0.000), confirming the central role of creative
thinking in preparing for the labor market. At the level of creative thinking components, creative method skills
are the most prominent factor with a large and certain impact = 0.412; T = 8.583; p = 0.000), followed by
collaboration - communication skills with a significant impact = 0.276; T = 4.929; p = 0.000) and context
exploitation - support skills with a statistically significant impact level = 0.198; T = 3.046; p = 0.002). In
addition, foundational thinking skills showed a small but significant effect = 0.187; T = 2.562; p = 0.011),
and domain expertise skills had a modest but still reliable effect (β = 0.145; T = 2.132; p = 0.033). In contrast,
motivational self-management skills did not reach statistical significance = 0.089; T = 1.459; p = 0.145),
suggesting that the effect of this factor may be context-dependent or need to be measured more finely. Overall,
the high T-indexes and very small p-indexes in the main paths strengthen the reliability of the model, and indicate
that intervention priorities should focus on creative methodological skills, collaboration-communication, and
context-support exploitation, while strengthening the foundation and expertise to enhance creative thinking,
thereby improving career readiness.
REFERENCES
1. Amabile, TM, & Pratt, MG (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in
organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 8520
www.rsisinternational.org
2. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-
the-Science Review and Prospective Commentary. Journal of Management, 40(5), 12971333.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
3. Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2009). The four C” model of creativity. Review of General
Psychology, 13 (1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
4. Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and
context. Studies in Higher Education, 43 (11), 19231937.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2017.1416758
5. Deci, EL, & Ryan, RM (2000). The what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-
determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227268.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
6. Dorst, K. (2011). The core of design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32 (6), 521532.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
7. Finch, D.J., Hamilton, L.K., Baldwin, R., & Zehner, M. (2013). An exploratory study of factors
affecting graduate employability. International Journal of Management Education, 11 (1), 4251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2013.07.001
8. Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design reasoning of school children in the
context of a year-long design-based learning project. AIEDAM, 24 (3), 285302.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006041000020X
9. Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012). Non-technical skill gaps in Australian business graduates.
Education + Training, 54 (2/3), 95113. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210224
10. Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0235
11. Ma, H.H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity
Research Journal, 21 (1), 3042. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633400
12. Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal,
24 (1), 9296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
13. Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative
review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64 (2), 293325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-
8791(03)00087-6
14. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship
to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6), 11371148.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
15. Veenman, MVJ, & Spaans, M.A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age
and task differences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (1), 119137.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X25030