evaluating - selecting ideas, testing prototypes, critical thinking) as well as the level of influence of each of these
components on students' career readiness, as in the studies of Do, TM (2023) and Viet, TSCQ, & Trung, TSNT
(2021)
Therefore, this study was conducted to fill the current theoretical and practical gap by building a research model
to test the relationship between soft skills groups and creative thinking skills, thereby assessing the impact of
creative thinking skills on career readiness of students majoring in Fashion Design and Garment Technology.
Through quantitative survey methods, the study aims to provide valuable empirical data for training, career
guidance and curriculum development at higher education institutions.
OVERVIEW AND RESEARCH MODEL
In the context of higher education and the labor market operating in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous
environment, creative thinking is considered a core competency that contributes to enhancing students’ career
readiness through enhancing their ability to adapt, solve problems and innovate in their work. Internationally,
contemporary theoretical frameworks have provided a solid foundation to explain this connection. The dynamic
component model of creativity and innovation in organizations emphasizes the intersection of domain
competence, creative process, and task motivation in a supportive context, thereby explaining how individual
creative capacity translates into job performance and career prospects (Amabile & Pratt, 2016). At the individual
development level, the Four Cs model shows that creativity is a continuum from academic to professional levels,
implying that nurturing and accumulating creative experiences in an educational context is a prerequisite for
increasing professional competence and labor market readiness (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2009). Complementing
these theoretical frameworks, approaches to 21st century skills and employability consistently recognize creative
thinking, along with critical thinking and problem solving, as cross-functional competencies prioritized by
employers, positively associated with employability and early career advancement. early career (Clarke, 2018)
Empirical evidence further supports the argument that developing creativity in higher education can enhance
career readiness indicators. A large-scale quantitative meta-analysis shows that structured creativity training
programs—including divergence/convergence techniques, problem reframing, and solution planning—have
significant effects on learners’ creative output, while also improving competencies directly related to
transferability to career contexts (Scott, Leritz, & Mumford, 2004). Meanwhile, studies applying Design
Thinking in education show that this approach helps learners develop the competencies of user understanding,
iterative experimentation, and multidisciplinary collaboration—core components of career readiness in the
modern workplace (Liedtka, 2018). At the level of psychological-learning mechanisms, Self-Determination
Theory asserts that satisfying the needs for autonomy, competence, and social connectedness fosters intrinsic
motivation, thereby supporting creative persistence and enhancing career outcomes such as initiative,
adaptability, and career self-efficacy. (Deci & Ryan, 2000) At the same time, evidence on the role of
metacognition shows that the ability to monitor and regulate thinking processes is associated with complex
problem-solving abilities, an important indicator of career readiness (Veenman & Spaans, 2005). From a labor
market perspective, employer surveys have noted that creativity/innovation is a distinctive signal in hiring,
positively related to organizational integration and initial job performance (Finch, Hamilton, Baldwin, & Zehner,
2013)
In Vietnam, the research on student employability has developed rapidly in recent decades, but the variable
“creative thinking” often appears as a dimension in the group of soft skills or in research on innovative teaching
methods, instead of being tested as a separate construct with a direct impact on career readiness. Domestic
surveys reflect a consensus between students and employers on the importance of creativity for employability
and job adaptation, but the combination of variables makes it difficult to separate the specific influence
mechanism of creative thinking. Pedagogical interventions such as project-based learning, experiential learning
or integrating Design Thinking often show simultaneous improvements in creativity, collaboration and learning
autonomy, accompanied by increases in students’ career confidence and career intentions; However, most
studies use pre-posttest designs with medium sample sizes, lack control groups, and rarely use structural
modeling to test the direct relationship between creative thinking and career readiness. In addition, creativity
scales in many domestic studies are short, self-reported in general terms, or not standardized according to
specialized scales such as creative self-efficacy or creative behavior inventory, leading to limitations in