INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 1
www.rsisinternational.org
The effect of Instructional Methods on Learners with Hearing
: The Case of CJSM Ngoma
Inclusive School, Rwanda
Jean Sauveur Niyorumuri, Guwa Chikomon, Donald Shoko
Rwanda Basic Education Board, TTC Save, P. O. Box 97, Butare, Rwanda
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0654
17October23October Published: 14 November2025
ABSTRACT
As educational institutions strive for inclusivity, understanding effective teaching strategies is crucial for
optimising learning outcomes for these learners. The study’s objectives are to examine how instructional
methods affect learners with hearing impairments' academic performance of learners with hearing impairment,
and identify the effective strategies that can be used to improve their educational outcomes. The study employed
a descriptive survey design. Quantitative data was obtained from hard copy anonymous questionnaires. Findings
indicate that instructional methods incorporating visual elements and interactive components significantly
enhance the learning experience for learners with hearing impairments. The study reveals that technology, when
integrated thoughtfully into teaching practices, can provide substantial support, although access and training
remain critical factors influencing its effectiveness. Instructional materials such as captions and visual aids are
highly regarded for their effectiveness in facilitating comprehension and engagement among learners.
Despite the positive outcomes associated with tailored instructional strategies, challenges related to social
engagement and peer interaction persist, indicating the need for comprehensive approaches that address both
academic and social dimensions. The research underscores the importance of ongoing professional development
for educators and emphasises the necessity of fostering inclusive environments that promote collaboration and
understanding among all students. Ultimately, these insights aim to inform best practices in teaching learners
with hearing impairments, ensuring equitable educational opportunities.
Keywords: hearing impairment, learners, instructional method, academic performance, inclusive education
INTRODUCTION
The academic success of learners with hearing impairment is a critical area of interest in educational research,
as it addresses the broader challenge of inclusive and effective teaching strategies. Numerous nations around the
world have conducted studies on the effects of instructional strategies on the academic performance of learners
with hearing impairment in inclusive education. Despite the fact that every child is different, students with
special needs need a little bit more care and attention than regular students (Sthitaprajnya, 2022). Hearing
impairment can significantly affect communication, social interaction, and access to information, leading to
disparities in academic performance compared to their hearing peers. Rwanda has approximately 446 000 people
living with disabilities (CSO, 2022). They routinely fare worse than others in terms of health, educational
success, economic, political, and cultural participation, poverty rates, dependency levels, and legal protection
(UNDP, 2022). As educational institutions strive to provide equitable learning opportunities, understanding the
impact of various instructional methods on the academic outcomes of learners with hearing impairment become
critical.
Like other policy instruments, the current National Strategy for transformation (NST1 2025- 2029), Education
Sector Strategic Plan (ESSP - 2025/2029), Special Needs and Inclusive Education Policy and its Strategic Plan
(2025-2029) were designed to specifically address the special educational needs of all learners with disabilities
including children with hearing impairment in their inclusive education by using different instructional strategies
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2
www.rsisinternational.org
(SNIE Strategic Plan, 2019). However, learners with hearing impairment face challenges in the classroom that
affect their academic performance.
Different instructional strategies, including visual aids, hands-on learning, and the use of technology, can play a
transformation role in enhancing comprehension and retention of knowledge among learners with hearing
impairment. However, it is not clear which instructional methods are most effective in this context. For instance,
(Rowland 2007; Jelinek & Jackson, 2017) have shown that the use of captioning increases vocabulary and
improves reading comprehension while giving students access to academic and cultural experiences. Any
product system, piece of apparatus, piece of software, or other piece of Assistive Technology (AT) used to
maintain, enhance, or increase the functional capabilities of people with disabilities is referred to as assistive
technology (ATiA, 2020). This research explored how these diverse teaching approaches affect not only
academic performance but also engagement, motivation, and self-efficacy in hearing-impaired learners. By
examining the correlation between instructional methods and academic outcomes, the study seeks to inform
educators and policymakers about best practices that can foster an inclusive environment conducive to learning
for all learners, regardless of their hearing ability.
Additionally, no research has been done on the academic performance of students in Rwanda's inclusive
education system, specifically at CJSM Ngoma Inclusive School, who have hearing impairments. Due to the
learners' extremely poor performance in class, this study sought to close this gap by examining the impact of
instructional strategies on the academic performance of learners with hearing impairment. Therefore, the
objectives of this study are to (1) examine how instructional methods affect students with hearing impairments'
academic performance of learners with hearing impairment, and (2) identify the effective strategies that can be
used to improve their educational outcomes.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Research examining instructional methods reveals significant challenges affecting academic performance of
learners with hearing impairment globally. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) paradigm demonstrates
significant potential for improving academic performance of learners with hearing impairment by providing
flexible, inclusive instructional methods. Multiple studies show UDL's effectiveness: (Novembli et al., 2024)
found UDL increased student confidence and participation, while (Caroline et al., 2025) emphasised the
importance of varied engagement, representation, and expression methods. Key improvements include;
providing multiple means of representation; offering flexible learning environments, and enhancing student
engagement and self-expression. However, challenges remain. (Dennis Mumba et al., 2022) noted persistent
issues like insufficient resources and inappropriate instructional methodologies. (Espada-Chavarria et al., 2023)
highlighted the need for continued practical implementation of universal design teaching models. The evidence
suggests UDL is promising but requires ongoing refinement and comprehensive institutional support to
maximise its potential for hearing-impaired learners.
Studies consistently demonstrate that instructional strategies significantly influence academic outcomes for
students with hearing impairment in inclusive classrooms (Ezechinyere, 2021). Socioeconomic factors, previous
academic scores, and deafness-related characteristics also influence performance (Rajamoni et al., 2022). Deaf
children have historically performed poorly in reading and other academic subjects within the United States of
America. The academic success of students who are deaf and hard of hearing has consistently lagged behind that
of their contemporaries, particularly when it comes to reading and math. Additionally, numerous people who are
hard of hearing and deaf are at a significant disadvantage in post-secondary education due to their low academic
achievement (Herring & Woolsey, 2020). Educators perceive hearing-impaired students as average to below-
average performers, while students report difficulties understanding concepts due to inadequate instructional
accommodation (Kumatongo & Muzata, 2021). These findings highlight the urgent need for improved teacher
training and adapted instructional approaches.
In various African contexts, research on instructional methods for learners with hearing impairment reveals
significant impacts on academic performance. However, (Olufemi & Oladele, 2018) demonstrated that specific
instructional approaches can be effective, finding that Montessori didactic methods were more efficacious than
direct instruction for developing reasoning abilities in hearing-impaired children in Nigeria, with no significant
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3
www.rsisinternational.org
gender differences observed in effectiveness. Effective teaching methods require patience, creativity, and
customised instruction, utilising visual aids, technology, sign language, small-group instruction, and
collaborative learning environments (Polvanov, 2023). However, significant challenges persist in
implementation. Studies consistently identify barriers including limited resource availability, inadequate
infrastructure, outdated materials, and insufficient teacher training in assistive technologies (Caroline et al.,
2025; Mgendi et al., 2024). Also, (Odhiambo et al., 2024) note that teachers face obstacles including lack of
training in inclusive education, large class sizes, and limited lesson duration insufficient for attending to all
learners. The research consistently indicates that while instructional strategies are crucial for academic success,
systemic issues including teacher preparation, resource allocation, and communication barriers significantly
impact educational outcomes for learners with hearing impairment.
Studies from Southern Africa reveals significant challenges affecting academic performance of learners with
hearing impairment. Communication barriers emerge as a primary factor, with teachers lacking adequate sign
language competency, negatively impacting knowledge exchange in classrooms (Mumba et al., 2022; Musonda,
2017; Migeha, 2014). Teachers often lack adequate preparation in sign language instruction, contributing to poor
academic performance among hearing-impaired students. Multiple factors compound these challenges, including
negative attitudes toward academic work, poor pre-academic readiness skills, insufficient resources,
inappropriate instructional methodologies, and assessment approaches (Mumba et al., 2022). Students with
hearing impairment consistently underperform compared to hearing peers due to inappropriate instructional
methodologies, insufficient resources, and unsuitable curriculum content (Mumba et al., 2022; Musonda, 2017).
However, intervention approaches show promise for improving outcomes. A South African study demonstrated
that learners receiving Listening and Spoken Language therapy achieved superior academic performance and
age-equivalent language outcomes compared to those receiving traditional speech-language therapy (Casoojee
et al., 2024). The research consistently emphasises that sign language proficiency among teachers is crucial, as
communication barriers significantly impair knowledge exchange at the classroom level (Mumba et al., 2022).
In Kenya, the learners' role in the pedagogical process traditionally consisted of being a passive recipient while
the teachers' role was to transmit knowledge and skills. The environment in the classroom should resemble a
busy workplace with a range of activities and sound levels depending on the type of work being done. Kenya
Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD) developed teaching techniques for learners with hearing
impairment in inclusive education setting (KICD, 2020).
Past studies on instructional methods and academic performance for students with disabilities in Rwanda reveals
significant impacts of teaching approaches. More than 446 000 Rwandans are disabled and live in the country
(CSO, 2022). They routinely fare worse than others in terms of health, educational success, economic, political,
and cultural participation, poverty rates, dependency levels, and legal protection (UNDP, 2022). Statistics also
reveal that 154 of the 91,193 students enrolled in higher education institutions have special educational needs.
Initiatives from private organisations, primarily religious institutions and charities, were the first to focus on the
education of students with hearing impairment. Signs and spoken language in the local language (Kinyarwanda)
were used to deliver instructions (ESSP 2018/19 2023/24).
A comparative analysis of various instructional models reveals that inclusive teaching practices positively impact
students with hearing impairments. According to research by (Rowland, 2007) and (Jelinek & Jackson, 2001),
the use of captioning increases vocabulary and reading comprehension while giving students access to academic
and cultural experiences (Rodriguez & Diaz, 2017). Methods that integrate assistive technologies, such as
captioning services and hearing aids, are shown to create a more conducive learning environment (Joskow et al.,
2025). Furthermore, cooperative learning strategies, which promote peer interaction and support, have been
linked to increased motivation and engagement among students. Research indicates that when learners with
hearing impairments are provided with tailored instructional approaches, their academic performance in subjects
like mathematics and reading improves markedly, thereby narrowing the achievement gap with their hearing
peers (Bashir et al., 2024).
Andala & Ng'umbi (2016) demonstrated that teaching methods significantly affect academic performance at
Rwandan universities, with group discussions proving most effective, followed by interactive lectures, while
traditional lectures were least beneficial. For students with hearing impairments specifically, (Sibomana et al.,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4
www.rsisinternational.org
2025) found that inclusive education practices significantly influence learning interest, with 98% of respondents
indicating that inclusive settings enhance student engagement and reduce stigma. Key factors included adapted
teaching methods, participation in discussions, and building self-esteem among hearing-impaired students.
These studies collectively highlight the importance of adaptive, inclusive instructional approaches for students
with disabilities in Rwanda's educational system.
The results of a study on teaching English composition to students with hearing impairment in the province of
Nyanza revealed that repetition, discussion, questioning, guided writing, and demonstration were the most
frequently employed teaching methods. The study also showed that learners who are deaf use the least effective
strategies, such as dramatisation and peer teaching, which may be the reason for their poor performance in
English composition writing. Maintaining a positive learning environment in the classroom requires a positive
attitude (Ting & Gilmore, 2022).
Moreover, the importance of teacher training cannot be overstated in this context. Educators equipped with
knowledge and skills to implement specialised instructional methods are better positioned to support learners
with hearing impairments effectively (Ismail, 2022). Studies emphasise the need for professional development
programs that focus on adaptive teaching techniques and the use of technology in the classroom (Moltudal et al.,
2022). As a result, teachers can foster inclusive learning environments that accommodate diverse learning needs,
ultimately leading to enhanced academic performance for students with hearing impairments.
METHODS
This study was carried out at CJSM Ngoma Inclusive School, Huye District, Southern province in Rwanda. The
study employed a descriptive survey design. Descriptive survey design research methodology is used to collect
and analyse data to describe the characteristics, behaviours, or opinions of a population or phenomenon at a
single point in time without manipulation of the variables (Creswell, 2009). The study was informed by the
Universal Design for Learning paradigm. Adopting this paradigm was ideal for this study because it helps to
improve the teaching and learning of all learners by creating inclusive, effective and engaging learning
environments. Purposive sampling was done to select CSJM Ngoma because it has learners with hearing
impairment who are the main participants of this research. Quantitative data was obtained from hard copy
anonymous questionnaires. The questionnaires used a 5-point Likert scale for answers with closed-ended
questions focused on how instructional methods affect learners with hearing impairments' academic performance.
Quantitative data generated were coded and assessed using Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) and
descriptive statistics.
The sampled school had a combined enrolment of 457 learners: 156 learners with hearing impairment and 301
hearing learners. Random sampling technique was used in the selection of learners with hearing impairment,
hearing learners, teachers trained to teach learners with hearing impairment and untrained teachers.
In this study, the Slovin's formula was used to come up with the sample size. Calculating Slovin's formula yields:
n=N/(1+Ne2). where: n: Required sample size N: Number of people e: Tolerable error margin (Zach, 2022).
The table below shows the sample size.
Table 1: Sample size
Respondents
Population
Sample
Learners with hearing impairment
156
112
Hearing learners
301
171
Teachers trained to teach learners with hearing impairment
19
18
Untrained teachers
17
16
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5
www.rsisinternational.org
Total
493
317
The ethics and guidelines as outlined by the College of Education at the University of Rwanda’s College of
Education were strictly followed. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Rwanda. Permission were
granted from the relevant authorities and schools. Informed consent was also solicited from the respondents.
Respondents were informed that consent must be given voluntarily and that participants have the right to
withdraw at any time. Anonymity and confidentiality of the respondents were guaranteed.
RESULTS
The survey results highlight the educational experiences of learners with hearing impairments, emphasising the
critical role of learning resources and technology in enhancing their academic performance. Respondents
overwhelmingly recognise the benefits of captions and visual aids, which aid comprehension and engagement
in the classroom. However, concerns regarding social engagement persist, indicating a need for improved
integration and interaction among learners with and without hearing impairments.
Table 2: The learners’ views on the effect of instructional methods on the academic performance of learners with
hearing impairment.
Key: SA: Strongly agree; A: Agree; N: Neutral; D: Disagree; SD: Strongly disagree.
Question
SA
A
N
D
SD
The school provides learning resources and
instructional materials so that learners with hearing
impairments can improve their academic performance.
53 (54)
79 (28)
5 (2)
39 (14)
5(2)
Learning resources are a major factor in improving
academic performance for learners with hearing
impairment.
93 (33)
161 (57)
10 (3)
8 (3)
11 (4)
Both you and learners who have hearing loss use
technology to improve their academic performance.
144 (51)
107 (38)
7 (2)
11 (4)
14 (5)
Learners with hearing impairments perform better
when captions are used.
139 (49)
113 (40)
31 (1)
0
0
In both school and home settings, learners with hearing
impairments engage in equal play with their hearing
peers.
17 (6)
25 (9)
142 (50)
91 (32)
8 (3)
You both benefit from learning together in an inclusive
environment as learners with and without hearing
impairment.
121 (43)
113 (40)
11 (3)
22 (8)
16 (6)
Your academic performance is improved by the way
that your class is seated.
102 (36)
141 (50)
10 (3)
14 (5)
16 (6)
Learners with hearing impairments perform better
academically when visual aids are available and used in
class.
139 (49)
105 (37)
9 (3)
11 (4)
19 (7)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 6
www.rsisinternational.org
You are given the tools and resources you need to boost
your academic performance.
153 (54)
91 (32)
6 (2)
19 (7)
14 (5)
The data presents survey responses regarding the educational experiences of learners with hearing impairments,
focusing on various aspects such as resources, technology, and social engagement. A significant majority of
respondents feel that learning resources and technology play a vital role in enhancing the academic performance
of learners with hearing impairments. The use of captions and visual aids is highly regarded and seen as
beneficial. There is a notable concern regarding social engagement, with a majority neutral or disagreeing about
equal participation with peers. Overall, access to resources and an inclusive environment is viewed positively,
though there are areas needing improvement, particularly in social interactions. This data highlights the
importance of tailored educational strategies and resources for learners with hearing impairments.
Table 3: Teachersviews on the effect of instructional methods on the academic performance of students with
hearing impairment.
Question
Responses (%)
SA
A
N
D
SD
The school makes resources and teaching aids available to
help learners with hearing impairments perform better
academically.
24 (71)
9 (26)
1 (3)
0
0
The instructional materials used greatly enhance the
academic performance of hearing-impaired learners.
19 (56)
13 (38)
1 (3)
1 (3)
0
Learners with hearing impairments can benefit from
technologies that help them perform better academically.
13 (38)
16 (47)
2 (6)
1 (3)
2 (6)
Hearing-impaired learners perform better when captions are
used.
9 (26)
7 (21)
0
12 (35)
6 (18)
In both school and home settings, learners with hearing
impairments engage in equal play with their hearing peers.
8 (24)
3 (9)
0
11 (32)
12 (35)
Learning in an inclusive environment is enjoyable for
learners with hearing impairment.
10 (29)
18 (53)
3 (9)
1
(3)
2 (6)
The way learners with hearing impairments sit in class has an
impact on their academic performance.
19 (56)
9 (26)
3 (9)
1 (3)
2 (6)
Learners with hearing impairment perform better in class
when using visual aids.
21 (62)
11 (32)
2 (6)
0
0
A capable and reliable administrative system improves both
the academic performance of learners with hearing
impairment and that of their hearing peers.
19 (56)
13 (38)
1 (3)
1 (3)
0
Giving learners with hearing impairment access to the
necessary tools and resources in the classroom boosts their
academic performance.
22 (65)
9 (26)
3 (9)
0
0
The survey results provide insights into the perceptions of respondents regarding the educational support
available for learners with hearing impairments. A strong majority of respondents believe that the availability of
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 7
www.rsisinternational.org
resources and teaching aids significantly supports the academic performance of learners with hearing
impairments. Instructional materials and visual aids are seen as particularly effective, with high agreement that
they enhance learning outcomes. While there is recognition of the benefits of technology, opinions are more
divided, suggesting that access to and training on these technologies may need improvement. Concerns about
social engagement and equal play with peers reflect potential challenges in inclusive environments, indicating
that further efforts are needed to facilitate interactions between hearing-impaired learners and their peers.
Overall, respondents express a positive view towards inclusive education, emphasising the importance of
appropriate seating arrangements, administrative support, and access to necessary tools and resources in
promoting academic success.
Table 4: Primary School Learners’ Pre-test and Post-test Results (20242025) n= 54
Grade Level
Pre-test Mean Score (%)
Post-test Mean Score (%)
Observed Improvement (%)
P1
78.4
82.3
+3.9
P2
85.6
87.5
+1.9
P3
82.3
84.2
+1.9
P4
69.2
74.2
+5.0
P5
67.1
70.5
+3.4
P6
69.7
73.6
+3.9
Overall Mean
75.4
78.7
+3.3
The data indicate consistent improvement across all primary grades following the application of inclusive
instructional methods. The most substantial gain was recorded in P4 (+5%), showing that visual and interactive
teaching strategies had a strong impact on learners’ comprehension and engagement. These findings highlight
the effectiveness of learner-centred approaches in improving academic outcomes among learners with hearing
impairment.
Table 5: Secondary School Learners’ Pre-test and Post-test Results (20242025) n= 58
Grade Level
Pre-test Mean Score (%)
Post-test Mean Score (%)
Observed Improvement (%)
S1
65.1
71.2
+6.1
S2
53.1
56.5
+3.4
S3
71.5
75.3
+3.8
S4
78.5
82.0
+3.5
S5
81.5
84.3
+2.8
S6
90.2
91.0
+0.8
Overall Mean
73.3
76.7
+3.4
Secondary school learners also exhibited notable academic progress, particularly in S1 (+6.1%), which reflects
strong learning gains after exposure to inclusive instructional methods. However, improvement margins
narrowed in upper grades, suggesting that more complex curriculum content and reduced use of adaptive
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 8
www.rsisinternational.org
strategies may affect performance. Overall, both data sets confirm that inclusive, visual, and interactive
instructional approaches contribute positively to the academic achievement of learners with hearing impairment.
Figure 1: Comparison of academic performance among learners with hearing impairment
Figure 1 presents a clustered bar chart comparing the mean Pre-test and Post-test scores across primary and
secondary grades. The chart indicates overall improvement in performance across both levels, highlighting the
positive impact of inclusive instructional methods. The gap between bars shows the extent of progress recorded
after the application of visual, sign-supported, and interactive teaching strategies.
Figure 2: Trends in pre-test and post test results for students with hearing impairment (2024 2025)
Figure 2 shows the trend in Pre-test and Post-test results for both primary and secondary learners. The upward
progression from Pre-test to Post-test scores across most grade levels reflects the beneficial influence of
instructional interventions on learners’ academic achievement. The trend further suggests that consistent use of
learner-centred methods contributes to sustained performance gains.
DISCUSSION
The survey findings present a nuanced picture of the educational landscape for learners with hearing impairments,
highlighting both strengths and challenges. A significant majority of respondents recognise the vital role that
learning resources and technology play in enhancing academic performance of hearing impaired learners. Mbazi
et al., (2025) found that assistive devices enhance communication, academic performance, and self-esteem
among hearing impaired learners. This consensus underscores the importance of providing tailored educational
materials that address the specific needs of these learners. The strong endorsement of captions and visual aids
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 9
www.rsisinternational.org
as beneficial tools emphasises their effectiveness in supporting comprehension and engagement, suggesting that
educators should prioritise their integration in lesson planning.
Despite this positive outlook on academic resources, the divided opinions regarding technology indicate a critical
area for improvement. While many acknowledge the advantages that technology can offer, there is a clear need
for better access and training. This gap suggests that merely providing technological tools is insufficient; schools
must also invest in professional development for educators and training for students to ensure that these resources
are used effectively. The research reveals persistent challenges in technology integration, including the digital
divide, infrastructure limitations, and uneven teacher preparedness (Val et al., 2024). In the same vein, Saputra
et al., (2025) note that while technology offers transformative potential for personalised learning and research,
studies consistently note substantial barriers. By fostering a more comprehensive understanding of how to
implement technology in the classroom, educators can enhance its impact on learning outcomes for students
with hearing impairments.
The notable concerns regarding social engagement present another layer of complexity on hearing impaired
learners. The majority of respondents feeling neutral or disagreeing about equal participation with peers indicates
that, despite the availability of academic resources, social integration remains a significant challenge. Research
indicates that hearing impaired students experienced substantial difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic,
with challenges including: communication barriers from mask-wearing (Mansutti et al., 2022), limited online
learning accessibility (Aljedaani et al., 2022), and increased feelings of loneliness (Tavanai et al., 2021).
Classroom engagement studies suggest additional complications, with communication barriers and limited sign
language proficiency among teachers hindering social interactions (Mgendi et al., 2024). The research
consistently demonstrates that hearing impaired learners require targeted support strategies to mitigate these
social engagement complexities. This concern points to potential barriers, such as communication difficulties or
social stigma, that may hinder meaningful interactions between hearing-impaired learners and their hearing peers.
Addressing these challenges is essential for fostering an inclusive educational environment where all students
feel valued and engaged.
To improve social engagement, schools must implement targeted strategies that promote interaction and
collaboration among students. Evidence from multiple studies strongly supports this approach. Zitha et al. (2023)
found that innovative strategies like group projects, role-playing, peer-to-peer learning, and talent integration
can dramatically improve student performance and academic success. Qureshi et al. (2023) further validated
these findings, demonstrating that social factors such as peer interaction and social presence positively impact
collaborative learning. The research, drawing from studies across different educational levels, provides
compelling evidence that collaborative approaches enhance communication, cooperation, and social
responsibility. Therefore, initiatives such as buddy systems, inclusive group activities, and awareness programs
can help bridge the gap between hearing-impaired learners and their peers. Furthermore, fostering a culture of
empathy and understanding within the school community is vital for encouraging inclusive behaviours.
Analysis of the pre-test and post-test results revealed a general improvement in learners’ academic performance
following the application of inclusive instructional methods. At the primary level, mean scores increased across
all grades, with notable gains in P4 (+5%) and P1 (+3.9%), reflecting the positive influence of visual and sign-
supported teaching strategies. Similarly, secondary school learners demonstrated measurable progress, with the
highest improvement recorded in S1 (+6.1%), suggesting that early exposure to learner-centred instructional
methods enhanced comprehension and retention. The clustered bar charts and line graphs illustrate consistent
upward trends from pre-test to post-test results across both school levels. These quantitative results confirm that
the adoption of interactive, visual, and inclusive instructional practices significantly improved the academic
performance of learners with hearing impairment.
Overall, while the findings highlight a strong belief in the importance of learning resources and technology for
academic success, they also reveal significant challenges related to social engagement. By addressing the barriers
to social interaction and enhancing access to and training on technology, educational institutions can create a
more supportive environment that benefits both the academic and social development of learners with hearing
impairments. This holistic approach is essential for ensuring that all students have the opportunity to thrive in
an inclusive educational landscape.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10
www.rsisinternational.org
CONCLUSIONS
The findings highlight a strong consensus among respondents regarding the crucial role of learning resources
and technology in enhancing the academic performance of learners with hearing impairments. The positive
feedback on the effectiveness of captions and visual aids underscores their significance in facilitating
understanding and engagement. However, the divided opinions about technology indicate a need for improved
access and training, suggesting that while technological tools can provide substantial benefits, their impact is
contingent upon the ability of both educators and students to utilise them effectively. This calls for a concerted
effort to enhance professional development and training initiatives to maximise the potential of these resources.
The study revealed that there are concerns surrounding social engagement which is a critical challenge in
fostering inclusive educational environments. The neutrality or disagreement regarding equal participation with
peers highlights the barriers that hinder meaningful interactions between hearing-impaired learners and their
hearing counterparts. To address these challenges, schools must implement targeted strategies that promote
social integration, such as collaborative activities and awareness programs. By creating opportunities for
interaction and cultivating a culture of empathy, educational institutions can enhance not only the academic
success but also the social development of learners with hearing impairments, ultimately ensuring a more
equitable and inclusive learning environment for all students.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not
for-profit sectors. The researchers obtained permission from relevant authorities and
informed assent from participants, protecting the confidentiality of data and adhering to ethical guidelines and
regulations.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest in this study.
REFERENCES
1. Aljedaani, W., Krasniqi, R., Aljedaani, S., Mkaouer, M. W., Ludi, S., & Al-Raddah, K. (2023). If online
learning works for you, what about deaf students? Emerging challenges of online learning for deaf and
hearing-impaired students during COVID-19: a literature review. Universal access in the information
society, 22(3), 1027-1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00897-5
2. Andala, O. H., & Ng’umbi, M. (2016). The teaching methods used in universities in Rwanda and their
effect on the students’ academic performance.
3. Bashir, R., Batool, A., & Amjad, F. (2024). Mathematical Problems faced by Hearing Impaired Students:
Strategies for Enhancing Learning and Comprehension. Journal of Development and Social
Sciences, 5(2), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-II-S)09
4. Caroline, O. M., & Awori, B. B. (2025). Assessment of the Accessibility Level to Available Learning
Resources and Their Influence on Performance of Learners with Hearing Impairment in Selected Public
Junior Secondary Schools in Kisii, Kenya. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social
Science, 9(3s), 4670-4682. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0337
5. Casoojee, A., Khoza-Shangase, K., & Kanji, A. (2024). A comparative study of learning outcomes for
hearing-impaired foundation phase learners. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1), 1419.
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1419
6. Creswell, J.W. (2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd
edn., SAGE, London.
7. Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R. H., López-Bastías, J. L., & az-Vega, M. (2023).
Universal design for learning and instruction: Effective strategies for inclusive higher
education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060620
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 11
www.rsisinternational.org
8. Ezechinyere, N. K., & Anyanwu, C. J. (2021). Teachers’ Instructional Strategies And Academic
Performance Of Student With Hearing Impairment In Inclusive Classroom In Akwa Ibom State. Quest
Journals, Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(11), 59-64.
9. Herring, T. J., & Woolsey, M. L. (2020). Three suggested teaching strategies for students who are deaf
or hard of hearing. Support for Learning, 35(3), 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12314
10. Ismail, S. (2022). The role of teachers in supporting learners who have a hearing impairment (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Johannesburg). https://hdl.handle.net/10210/502702
11. Jelinek, M.S, & Jackson, D.W. (2001). Television literacy: Comprehension of program content using
closed captions for the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6(1), 43-53.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/6.1.43
12. Joskow, R., Patel, D., Landre, A., Mattick, K., Holloway, C., Danemayer, J., & Austin, V. (2025).
Understanding the Impact of Assistive Technology on Users Lives in England: A Capability
Approach. Bioengineering, 12(7), 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12070750
13. Kumatongo, B., & Muzata, K. K. (2021). Lecturers and student teachers with hearing impairments’ own
perceptions on academic performance: a case study of Kitwe College of education Zambia.
https://doi.org/10.20952/jrks2112741
14. Mansutti, I., Achil, I., Rosa Gastaldo, C., Tomé Pires, C., & Palese, A. (2023). Individuals with hearing
impairment/deafness during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a rapid review on communication challenges and
strategies. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(15-16), 4454-4472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16572
15. Mbazi, S., Ojok, P., & Okwaput, S. (2024). Exclusion within the inclusion practices of learners with
hearing impairment in inclusive schools: A systematic review. International Journal of Studies in
Inclusive Education, 1(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.22271/27103862.2025.v5.i1a.103
16. Mgendi, J. C., Bali, T., & Sungwa, R. (2024). Enhancing Engagement of Hearing-impaired Pupils in
Inclusive Tanzanian Classrooms through Teaching and Learning Materials. Ta'dib, 27(1), 247-264.
https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v27i1.12553
17. Migeha, G. J. (2014). An analysis of academic performance of students with hearing impairment in
Tanzania secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).
18. Ministry of Education. (2018). Special needs & inclusive education strategic plan 2018/192023/24.
Kigali.
19. Ministry of Education. (2020). Education Sector Strategic Plan 2018/192023/24. Kigali.
20. Moltudal, S. H., Krumsvik, R. J., & Høydal, K. L. (2022). Adaptive learning technology in primary
education: Implications for professional teacher knowledge and classroom management. In Frontiers in
Education (Vol. 7, p. 830536). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.830536
21. Mumba, D., Kasonde-Ngandu, S., & Mandyata, J. (2022). Perceptions of teachers and pupils on factors
affecting academic performance of pupils with hearing impairment in primary schools in
Zambia. European Journal of Special Education Research, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v8i4.4399
22. Musonda, M. N. (2017). Emerging Factors Affecting Academic Performance of Learners with Hearing
Impairments at Grade Twelve Examination Level. International Journal of MultiDisplinary Research.
310 (1), 1 - 4
23. Novembli, M. S., Hasanah, N., & Fitriani, D. (2024). Investigating the impact of universal design for
learning: empowering students with disabilities in higher education. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol.
593, p. 04004). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459304004
24. Odhiambo, L. A., & Onchari, I. B. Instructional Strategies and Challenges Faced by Teachers in
Promoting Inclusive Learning for Learners with Hearing Impairments at Oriang’Inclusive Primary
School, Homa-Bay County, Kenya. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.804137
25. Polvanov, J. N. (2023). Effective methods of teaching hearing impaired children. American Journal Of
Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 3(05), 123-134.
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/volume03issue05-22
26. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting
students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning
Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
27. Rajamoni, R. N., Kumar, R. M. S., & Leela, B. C. (2022). Factors Affecting the Academic Performance
of Students with Hearing Impairment. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 36(4).
https://doi.org/10.18280/ria.360408
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 12
www.rsisinternational.org
28. Republic of Rwanda. (2017). 7 Years Government Programme: National Strategy for Transformation
(NST1) 2017-2024. Kigali.
29. Rodriguez, J., & Diaz, M. V. (2017). Media with Captions and Description to Support Learning among
Children with Sensory Disabilities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 2016-2025. DOI:
10.13189/ujer.2017.051118
30. Rowland, J. (2007). Closed-captioned video and the ESL classroom: A multi-sensory approach. Journal
of Adult Education, 36(2) 35-39.
31. Rwanda Education for All Coalition (REFAC). (2023). Active civil society for inclusive digital
education in Rwanda. Kigali.
32. Saputra, M. P. A., & Wahid, A. J. (2025). Education Revolution: Leveraging Technology to Improve
Learning Quality by 2025. International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research, 5(1), 30-36.
https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v5i1.867
33. Sthitaprajnya. P (2022) Teaching Strategies for Hearing Impaired Students. Retrieved from
https://www.thehighereducationreview.com/news/teaching-strategies-for-hearing-impaired-students-
nid-1180.html on 23
rd
may 2023.
34. Tavanai, E., Rouhbakhsh, N., & Roghani, Z. (2021). A review of the challenges facing people with
hearing loss during the COVID-19 outbreak: toward the understanding the helpful solutions. Auditory
and Vestibular Research, 30(2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.18502/AVR.V30I2.6091
35. UNDP, (2020). Standing up to the cost-of-living crisis report. Retrieved from
https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/202303/UNDP%202023%20Final%20Web%20vers
ion.pdf on 24
th
May 24, 2023.
36. Val, S., & López-Bueno, H. (2024). Analysis of digital teacher education: Key aspects for bridging the
digital divide and improving the teachinglearning process. Education Sciences, 14(3), 321.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030321
37. Zach (2022), What is Slovin’s Formula? Retrieved from https://www.statology.org/slovins-formula/ on
19
th
june 2023.
38. Zitha, I., Mokganya, G., & Sinthumule, O. (2023). Innovative strategies for fostering student engagement
and collaborative learning among extended curriculum programme students. Education Sciences, 13(12),
1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121196