Various studies have shown the empty chair to be an effective Gestalt counselling technique for resolving
university students' unmet issues (Ndhlovu and Mwanza, 2024). Others, including Trijayanti et al. (2019), have
demonstrated the effectiveness of the empty chair counselling technique in overcoming guilt in adolescents,
resolving emotional issues in inmates (Khairunnisa et al., 2019), and recognising the empty chair as effective in
resolving deep-seated and unexpressed emotional challenges, enhancing growth and healing (Romadhon and
Sanyata, 2019).
Scholars like Glass (2010) have indicated that in an example considering a client grappling with internal conflict,
one part of themselves harbours high expectations for achievement while another part succumbs to
procrastination and rationalisation. This internal dichotomy, which Perls famously referred to as the "top
dog/under dog" dynamic, serves as an example of the complexity inherent in human psychology. In this scenario,
the counsellor would guide the client to engage in a dialogue between these two opposing facets of their
personality. The technique encourages the client to physically move back and forth between the two chairs,
articulating their thoughts and feelings from each position alternately. This quality and active engagement of the
client is what sets the empty chair technique apart as a profoundly impactful technique with versatility and
transformative potential for emotional expression, thus distinguishing it from other traditional applications.
Flexibility is another hallmark of the Gestalt approach, which Orfanos (2024) stated employs a diverse range of
techniques tailored to suit the unique needs of individuals. This adaptability makes it relevant for various
counselling contexts, allowing practitioners to tailor their methods to the specific goals of counselling and the
unique characteristics of individual clients. Moreover, the utility of the Gestalt approach is not limited by age,
developmental stage, or cultural background; it applies to a wide demographic, emphasising the universal need
for self-exploration and authentic expression (Orfanos, 2021). Knowledge of this nature drove the need to
explore the limitations that the empty chair Gestalt counselling technique poses in its utilisation in helping
students overcome relationship conflicts at an institution of higher learning.
Other scholars have also acknowledged the limitations that Gestalt techniques may pose, despite their noted
effectiveness. Gulotta (2024) highlights that although Gestalt counselling techniques have many advantages, it
is also important to recognise their drawbacks. The Gestalt techniques require preparedness and willingness to
face and engage with one's emotions and thoughts. It is these expressive techniques that are liberating and
lifechanging for clients; others might feel uncomfortable or overly exposed, which could impede their progress
in therapy. It is against such literature that the need to explore the limitations of the empty chair Gestalt
counselling technique in resolving relational conflicts in university students at an institution of higher learning
was motivated.
Another limitation seen in the use of Gestalt counselling by Brennan (2021) is that it was found not helpful with
the psychological effects of some behaviours that were hereditary. It was also found to be limited in helping with
psychological factors not influenced by individual thoughts. Research by Glass (2010) highlights the "empty
chair" technique as an effective technique in promoting self-awareness and facilitating group interactions.
Although there is extensive literature on the effectiveness of this approach, the limitations of using the empty
chair counselling technique with students experiencing relationship problems in Kitwe remain unclear.
Investigating this issue could provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of such techniques in educational
settings and contribute to improved mental health support for students dealing with complex social dynamics.
A literature review has identified the strengths and weaknesses of Gestalt counselling techniques in addressing
various individual challenges. However, the limitations of the empty chair technique, specifically in higher
education institutions, in supporting students with relational conflicts, have not yet been explored. This extract
from a Doctor of Philosophy thesis by Mwanza (2025) addresses this gap. The study endeavoured to explore the
experiences of counsellors and clients in their subjective lived experiences with the empty chair Gestalt
counselling technique. To achieve this, the researchers adhered to the life world existentials, entailing the lived
body, lived space, lived time, and lived human relations (Carpenter, 2013). The counsellors are the experts with
expert knowledge (lived body) and experiences on how they used the empty chair technique (lived space) during
the counselling interaction (lived time) and to counsel the selected students (lived relations) at a university.