INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025| Special Issue on
Despite the widespread adoption of School-Based Assessment (SBA) across the world, the academic literature
does not provide any systematic and profound reviews of it, which would critically examine its philosophical
foundations and practical implementation problems. The majority of studies are inclined to concentrate on the
efficiency of SBA in definite countries or in definite schools, and few attempts are made to compare the results
in meaningful cross-context to another setting. These analyses are essential, not only in that they help to clarify
the theoretical underpinnings, such as constructivist or competency-based learning models, on which SBA is
based, but also reveal the situational barriers and practical difficulties of the problem. These issues are
preparedness of the teachers, resources, assessment literacy and policy congruity.
The research aims to analyze Sri Lanka's history and present trajectory in implementing SBA into its educational
framework and provide a comprehensive review of various SBA techniques being implemented globally.
LITERATURE REVIEW
School-Based Assessment (SBA) has been widely adopted across educational systems globally, driven by
philosophies emphasizing constructivism, learner-centered pedagogy, and formative evaluation. Countries such
as Finland have institutionalized SBA through formative feedback, portfolio assessments, and strong teacher
autonomy, fostering deep learning and student ownership (Sahlberg, 2011). Similarly, Canada's “Growing
Success” policy promotes individualized and reflective assessment strategies to cater to diverse learner needs
(Ontario Ministry of Education, 2010; Earl & Katz, 2002).
And also, New Zealand's NCEA framework connects SBA with national qualifications through curriculum-
aligned tasks, encouraging self-regulation and inquiry (NZQA, 2023; Hipkins & Vaughan, 2019). In Hong Kong,
SBA is integrated within the high-stakes HKDSE examination system through inquiry-based and project work
methods, supported by structured training and moderation (Carless et al., 2011; Tong & Adamson, 2015).
Singapore, known for innovation-based education, employs SBA via frameworks like Project Work and Design
Thinking (MOE, 2020).
Also, South Africa’s Continuous Assessment System (CASS) uses SBA to address educational equity but faces
infrastructure and training challenges (Chisholm & Leyendecker, 2007; Sayed et al., 2013). The Caribbean
region has advanced digital SBA through the CXC system, strengthening authentic learning and teacher-student
engagement, especially after COVID-19 (Evans, 2021; Issaka et al., 2020). Australia integrates SBA into high
school assessments under the HSC and SACE boards, balancing formative and summative assessments with
strong moderation (Klenowski, 2011; NESIA, 2023).
But, In Malaysia, the Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS) model promotes a hybrid approach combining
psychometric, co-curricular, and formative assessments. However, initial implementation challenges led to
revisions under PBS 2.0 to enhance training and tool support (Zakaria et al., 2024). China's SBA reforms
emphasize reflective learning and soft skills but face rural-urban disparities (Tan, 2016; Deneen & Hoo, 2021).
The United States, with decentralized education policy, implements SBA through portfolio and performance
assessments in models like NYPSC, aimed at civic engagement and deeper learning (Brookhart, 2013a; Fine et
al., 2020).
In contrast, Sri Lanka officially introduced SBAin 1998 (MOE, circular, 1998/45) following foundational reform
movements dating back to the Handessa scheme of 1945 (Aturupane & Little, 2019). Despite multiple policy
circulars (1998/45, 2001/23, 2017/23) and a comprehensive framework of 31 assessment types, actual
implementation faces persistent barriers. These include limited teacher assessment literacy (Weerakoon, 2025),
over-reliance on summative exams (Senarath, 2020), inadequate infrastructure (NEC, 2016), and domination of
classroom practices by lower-order assessments (Abayasekara & Arunatilake, 2018; Edussuriya et al., 2018).
Moreover, Sri Lanka’s curricular reforms have not fully embraced 21st-century assessment principles such as
authentic rubrics and higher-order thinking evaluation (Hapugoda & Kulasekara, 2024). The absence of
validated SBAtools, weak moderation systems, and lack of community awareness further widen the gap between
policy and practice (Perera et al., 2020; UNESCO, 2022). While the Ministry of Education has provided SBA
guideline handbooks, training inadequacies and administrative burdens have undermined their effective use
Page 9287