CONCLUSION
In this part of the study, the results revealed a significant impression regarding the imagery present in the
LUDABI poems. It can be said that the poems are rich in figurative language, enhancing and highlighting the
artistry of their poetry. The poems covered in this study include the following characteristics: First, they
frequently employ figures of speech, particularly metonymy, alliteration, and hyperbole. This demonstrates that
Visayan poets have a fondness for exaggerated expressions and that their choice of words is profound and
deeply rooted in Visayan diction. In other words, their works are filled with imagery and allegory. Other
rhetorical tools such as idioms and proverbs were rarely used. It can be concluded that the use of these
rhetorical devices is no longer as effective in poems whose theme centers on peace.
The analysis shows that using figurative language and rhetorical tools such as figures of speech is highly
effective in promoting the message of peace. This is because of the immeasurable number of people who are
forced to flee their ancestral lands during conflicts, and the indescribable emotions of disappointment and
suffering brought about by the absence of peace. The expression of appeals for peace and the narration of
events caused by conflict are more easily conveyed through figurative language. Personification, often used to
symbolize peace—such as the singing of birds and the whistling of the wind—soothes sorrow and calms
troubled minds and bodies. Hyperbole, which depicts elements symbolizing the lack of peace such as guns and
bullets, evokes bloodshed, hiding in darkness, and other extreme scenarios, is also among the most prominent
rhetorical tools observable in LUDABI poetry.
Meanwhile, in the Visayan language, the exposure of the undesirable effects of war is fervent, and poems
depicting conflict and the longing for peace are often imbued with elevated Visayan phrases.
RECOMMENDATION
The researcher recommends that students and teachers, especially in literature subjects and courses using the
lingua franca or the mother tongue as the medium of instruction, utilize the collected LUDABI poems as
instructional material for learning to write poetry and for analyzing regional literary works.
This study is open to further, deeper analysis regarding rhetorical devices, so that it may serve as a foundation
for learning rhetoric and creative writing.
REFERENCES
1. Abad, M.A. (2005). Retorika: Filipino III. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: National Book Store
2. Bacera, A., & Santos, I. (2015, August 21). Filipino 3: Masining na Pagpapahayag on WordPress.com.
Retrieved February 03, 2018, from https://filipino3bsit312015.wordpress.com/page/2/
3. Dizon, R.B. & Gervacio, G.V. (2014). Sining sa Pagtula. Iligan City, Philippines .
4. E. (2008, April 19). WHAT IS RHETORICS? ANU ANG RETORIKA? Retrieved February 03, 2018,
from http://erroljohn020.blogspot.com/2008/04/what-is- rhetorics-anu-ang-retorika.html
5. Garcia, E. (2015, May 19). Batayang Kalaaman sa Retorika. Retrieved February 03, 2018, from
http://maestroaeious.blogspot.com/
6. Importante, F. F. (1970, January 01). PANITIKAN. Retrieved May 4, 2018, from
7. http://ffaijm.blogspot.com/2017/06/mga-uri-ng-tayutay.html
8. M. (2012, January 11). PASUNDAYAG (Ipakita o to Show). Retrieved May 4, 2018, from
http://pasundayagfilipino3.blogspot.com/2012/01/tayutay-at-mga-halimbawa.html
9. Y. (2015, August 14). Wika at Panitikan. Retrieved February 03, 2018, from
http://siningngfilipino.blogspot.com/2015/08/ang- retorika.html