Page 9719
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Language Learning and Teaching: Nonverbal Communication
Matters
Maria Rosaria Nava, PhD
1
, Daniele Duscovich, PhD student
2
1
Università Europea di Roma, Rome, Italy
2
Alma Mater Europaea, Rome, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0739
Received: 14 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 13 December 2025
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, language competences have a strategic role both to establish social relations and favour mental
processes and logical/cognitive capacities, but they are not sufficient to determine the complete acquisition of a
language because other dimensions need to be considered, such as the socio-cultural context. So, a specific
communicative competence is necessary. In the process of language learning, especially in educational settings,
verbal communication is the main and only focus because language itself has several cultural, communal and
societal functions and through it people communicate their own experiences, thoughts, meanings, intentions,
and identity. However, the communication process depends largely on non-verbal elements many of which
tend to be ignored because they are unknown. Nonverbal communication refers to communication that occurs
through means other than words, such as body language, gestures, and silence. Therefore, the unsaid is
important in the communicative event and the development of intercultural competences should be seen as
necessary and essential in language learning. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to shed light on this field
of study and encourage the consideration of nonverbal communication clues into a language learning process.
Keywords: communication, language, learning, nonverbal.
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, people are continuously involved in social, cultural and interpersonal contacts and numerous
dimensions need to be considered in order to avoid or limit misunderstandings and communicative issues.
Language competences have a strategic role in the relations, language is the primary way people use to
communicate and interact, and these dynamics represent a constant part of their everyday life.
Through language individuals transmit their experiences, thoughts, meanings, intentions, feelings and identity.
Having only appropriate language competences is not sufficient because communication is a complex process
involving several elements: communication is what members of a culture use to share certain perspectives and
visions, to follow beliefs, values, behaviours and make them known. Hymes [1], introducing the concept of
communicative competence, argues that people need to use their language appropriately with regard to the
communicative context. Hymes also affirmed that a person "acquires competence as to when to speak, when
not, and as to what to talk about with whom, when, where, in what manner". Bonvillain [2], perfectly defined
the relationship between language and communication, "language is the primary means of communication
between people. (...) Language links interlocutors in a dynamic, reflexive process. We learn about people
through what they say and how they say it; we learn about ourselves through the ways that other people react to
what we say; and we learn about our relationships with others through the give-and-take of communicative
interactions.". Language is the main link with the outside world: through it people can "reliably cause precise
new combinations of ideas to arise in each other's minds”, [3]. Brown [4] affirms that "Language is the
roadmap of culture. It says where its people come from and where they are going". The communicative,
cultural, communal and social functions of a language are relevant and need a specific consideration. Firstly,
language helps to preserve and transmit culture; secondly, it links individuals into communities of shared
Page 9720
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
identities; thirdly, it manages all human interactions, it serves as social identification aspect unifying speakers
as members of a single speech community. The communicative function of a language is evident: words are
said, pronounced, expressed, declared, narrated and they are also listened, heard, perceived, caught. So, verbal
communication is immediate because it is based on the use of language, which allows for a direct and rapid
exchange of information. However, there is another hidden part of communication, the unsaid, the implicit and
implied, that is extremely difficult to grasp and therefore generally ignored. If communication is made up with
two dimensions, why do people underestimate the importance of one of the two or even neglect it? The purpose
of this paper is to encourage the consideration of nonverbal communication clues into a language learning
process as fundamental factor to regulate people’s behaviours during their social and cultural interactions.
LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION: A STRONG RELATION
Language is one of the fundamental capabilities of the human life. The ability of using language allows
humans to communicate, express thoughts, ideas and interact with people in order to understand the
surrounding world. So, it is possible to assume that language is not only a mere means of communication, but
instead a product of the human mind, rendering it a pivotal element for society. According to the German
philosopher Wilhelm von Humboldt [5], an artistic creative principle is formed in a language, and in fact it
belongs to the language itself, because its concepts get tonal embodiment, and thus the harmony of all spiritual
forces is combined here with a musical element, which, once a part of a language, does not lose its nature, but
only modifies it, meaning that it is not a mere mirroring of reality nor a simple instrument to express already
formed thoughts: it is a creative and dynamic activity allowing to create meaning and express new ideas and
opinions.
Communication is a phenomenon affecting every living being and is one of the pivotal elements determining
human relations [6]. Communication is an integral part of every single day and in linguistics it is described as
an ongoing, dynamic process [7], meaning that it changes with society. There is a strong relation between
language and communication. The ability of communicating is therefore strictly connected to the ability of
using the language in all its development phases. Language develops in several phases [8]: preverbal phase (0-
6 months), protoverbal phase (11-12 months), telegraphic language (20-24 months) and finally grammatical
and syntactical acquisition (2-4 years). In the first phase, where the child is very young, crying and vocalising
are the main vocal production and tend to be placed in the pauses made by the adults, with whom the baby is
communicating. This shows that, even if the baby is not able to communicate in the common sense, they are
able to express themselves and to communicate. Taking the newborn's crying as an example, it is a tool to
express emotions and feelings, and the task of a parent is also to try to understand and interpret these small
signals, to understand how to move on a tonic level, expressions and facial expressions. This "baggage" can
then be used to get in touch with the non-verbal communication that children use from an early age,
understanding their needs and emotions. Therefore, making an effort to understand these signals is necessary to
be able to communicate effectively with the child.
Many psychologists agree when saying that language is intrinsic characteristic of humans. The linguist
Chomsky stated that “humans are born with some basic ideas, and those ideas are of a distinct language nature”
[9]. According to Chomsky [10], every language in the world is equipped with a structure called “universal
grammar”, which includes the description of all structural aspects shared by natural language. On the other
hand, Piaget [11], the founder of genetic epistemology, provides an interactionist position. He formulates one
theory featuring elements of Innatism and Empiricism, stating that the language appears in the first stage of
cognitive developments of children, which he calls sensorimotor stage.
Different approaches are available about language and communication. Anyway, one point is clear: language
cannot exist without communication and communication cannot exist without language.
NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION: WHEN THE UNSAID ALSO MATTERS
Nonverbal communication plays a crucial role in the ability to understand and interpret others and represents
one of the three levels of communication alongside verbal communication, which is the words people say or
Page 9721
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
write, and paraverbal communication, which is the way they use their voice. Gestures and facial expressions
are key elements of nonverbal communication as they can convey information about people's emotions,
intentions and expectations, leading to deeper and more satisfying relationships, both in the personal and
professional context. Nonverbal communication is generally defined as the aspect of communication that is not
expressed in words. Abercrombie [12] claimed that we speak with the vocal organs, but we converse with the
whole body. Starting from the assumption that "one cannot not communicate" [13], and that all movements are
to some extent expressive, all nonverbal behaviours are summarized in this definition, which also suggests that
nonverbal communication includes a wide range of behaviours, some of which may not even be considered as
such. Therefore, in addition to more obvious nonverbal behaviours such as facial, vocal and postural
expressions, touch, proxemics and gaze, we can also list physical attraction, facial morphology, as well as
behavioural choices such as hairstyle, clothing or more generally one's external appearance. Some researchers
have also included material objects, which perform communicative functions within a given society [14].
Therefore, nonverbal communication is the process of conveying meaning without the use of written or spoken
words. Also said, any communication made between two or more people using facial expressions, hand
movements, body language, postures and gestures is called nonverbal communication. In the field of
communication sciences, nonverbal communication is divided into four components: the paralinguistic system
indicates the set of sounds emitted in verbal communication, regardless of the meaning of the words, and is
characterized by tone, frequency, rhythm and silence; the kinesic system includes all communicative acts
expressed by body movements such as eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, posture; the proxemics
analyses the messages sent by occupying space that tends to be divided into four main zones: intimate zone,
personal zone, social zone and public area; the haptics consists of communicative messages expressed through
physical contact. In this case we also move from codified forms of communication (a handshake, a kiss on the
cheek as a greeting to friends and relatives), to others of a more spontaneous nature (a hug, a pat on the
shoulder), [15]. Nonverbal communication may act as reinforcement, substitution, contradiction, accentuation,
regulation. It often happens that individuals believe they have sent a clear message when, in reality, this is not
the case. Humans overestimate both the intensity of their expressions and the clarity, that is, the ease with
which their expressions can be interpreted, as well as the extent to which they are observed by others [16].
Often referred to as body language, nonverbal communication can take many forms and be interpreted in
multiple ways by different people, especially across cultures. Even the lack of such nonverbal cues can be
significant and, in itself, a form of communication. Each movement and combination of body movements, such
as changes in posture, eye direction, gestures, and facial expressions, provide signals that are often
unambiguous and sometimes contradictory, meaning that one person may convey one piece of information
while their body language conveys a completely different message. One reason nonverbal communication is so
informative is because people use so many different aspects of their behaviour, appearance, and environment to
convey meaning. These types of nonverbal communication can vary greatly across cultures because each
culture interprets posture, gestures, eye contact, facial expressions, vocal noises, use of space, and time
differently [17].
Knowing, studying and being able to decipher these non-verbal messages can be a concrete help in making the
verbal communication more effective, meaningful and complete as well as respectful of the cultural differences
inevitably present in all the daily relationships [18].
LANGUAGE LEARNING AND NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION
The integration of language and culture should be considered as one of the fundamental purposes of language
teaching and learning and a key element to promote intellectual opening and curiosity, respect for cultural
differences, and the enjoyment in interaction with people from other countries. Consequently, it becomes
necessary to integrate the linguistic code with all the other dimensions that are involved in that linguistic
context. Communication between speakers of different languages is also about understanding the perceptions
and meanings arising from the other speaker, according to their cultural context. Language is, in many aspects,
a social factor and it conveys social, cultural and personal messages, and in doing so it is accompanied by a
whole series of important elements that enrich it but also make it much more complex. Sometimes, for those
Page 9722
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
who approach a different culture, the importance of the signals provided by nonverbal communication can be
underestimated, not fully understood, or hastily judged. In a multicultural context, when our interlocutors do
not share our linguistic and cultural background, nonverbal communication takes on a particularly important
role. Certainly, words are very important because they communicate a specific content, but nonverbal behavior
communicates this and much more. Much of what is communicated is nonverbal and misinterpretation or lack
of knowledge can lead to intercultural conflict, misunderstandings and ambiguities in communication, despite
the fluency of the language [19].
Teaching nonverbal communication, though, involves providing tools to interpret and use those nonverbal
signals, such as body language, facial expressions, eye contact, and gestures, to improve communication in
different contexts. Consequently, when we encounter a speaker of a different language, we gain access to a
different view of the world: communication cannot be considered only as a mere exchange of information, but
it should be regarded for its capacity of creating and maintaining relations into a specific cultural context.
Taking into account these considerations, we should wonder what the main purpose of teaching and learning a
language is, if it is only the acquisition of new language skills or also about gaining new cultural points of view
and benefiting from them. To communicate with other people, is it enough just to master grammar, vocabulary,
speaking, writing skills, or is it important also to focus on cultural and intercultural aspects? Can a sort of
"linguistic appropriateness" exist according to the cultural context we are in?
Valdes [20] argued that learners can become linguistically and culturally competent if they are aware of
themselves as cultural beings”. Along with learners’ acceptance of other cultures, comes the acceptance of
their language and a greater willingness to let go of the binding ties of the native language and culture”.
Communication and culture have a strong link and so are linguistic and intercultural competences. As the
constant changes within the existing context create continuous interactions among people coming from
different cultural and social backgrounds and speaking a language that is different from ours, it is evident that
language learning and learning about target cultures cannot be separated. A simple linguistic competence is,
evidently, not sufficient: we definitely need to “cross the bridge”, immerse ourselves in the new culture, we
must strive to grasp every signal, whether verbal or non-verbal, said or unsaid, and adapt our communication
style accordingly.
Therefore, as far as teaching and learning a new language are concerned, students need some sort of
knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to communicate effectively especially in multicultural contexts.
Mixing linguistic and cultural competences contributes to intercultural awareness, skills, and know-how that
are strategic within the globalized world. The development of intercultural competences is an active process of
continuous learning which implies even a transformation of the person’s identity while experiencing other
different cultures or group interactions, in their own country or abroad [21]. As far as teaching and learning a
new language are concerned, the concept of communicative competence should become ‘intercultural
communicative competence’, needing from students some sort of knowledge, skills, attitudes necessary to
communicate interculturally. The linguistic and cultural competences contribute to intercultural awareness,
skills, and know-how because within the globalized world intercultural contacts are greater and greater,
necessitating both understanding and negotiation of differences through effective communication. The
theoretical framework shows a growing interest in exploring ‘culture’, both in language teaching and learning
[22]. Some researchers [23] highlighted the importance of cultural information in language teaching, claiming
that there is an interrelationship between a language and its people and if cultural information is not taught as a
part of communicative competence, complete communication cannot happen. Sihui [24] affirmed that language
and culture are inseparable: beliefs, ideas, and identities of a group of people are constructed and
communicated by language. Therefore, the educational settings should work on cross-cultural experiential
learning encouraging the learners to lose themselves in the target language [25] and taking into consideration
elements and dimensions of nonverbal communication and combining them with verbal language learning. We
argue that this fundamental aspect should little by little become a central issue in teaching a foreign language.
Certainly, teaching “the unsaid” may be extremely hard: symbols, gestures, facial expressions, social and
personal space, eye contact and so on are not of immediate understanding and, especially, of easy application.
Saying without words may be misunderstood much more easily than saying with words. Nonverbal
communication is complex and understanding it often depends on the social environment in which one
operates. There is no dictionary with unambiguous translations of nonverbal messages.
Page 9723
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Consequently, teachers should become more aware of the fact that enabling learners to communicate
effectively with people coming from various cultural backgrounds could be one of their main goals and could
fall into their teaching methodology. In fact, learners should be committed to turning language encounters into
intercultural encounters and more profound relationships [26]. Teaching culture in schools is essential to
develop informed citizens capable of interacting effectively with the world. Not only does this process involve
acquiring knowledge but also developing transversal skills and a deeper understanding of diverse cultural
realities. Effective methodologies include innovative teaching methods, an experiential approach integrated
with other disciplines, teaching respect for cultural diversity, recognizing that each culture has its own value
and uniqueness, and using texts, multimedia materials, and digital tools that offer a variety of cultural
perspectives. Moreover, teaching a language refers to signs, drawings, artifacts, clothing, and personal
adornment but also an environmental dimension, made up of colors, lights, architecture, space, directions, and
natural elements that communicate to humans about their nature [27]. Within the classroom, teachers need to
apply a kind of experiential learning using simulations, working on theatrical situations, facing incidents or
misunderstandings. In other words, acting rather than talking, recurring to patterns that are different from their
own culture. Certainly, even before entering cultural environments different from our own, it will be necessary
to reflect on our own cultural belonging and what characterizes it. In this sense, observing real-world situations
in which cultural diversity plays a key role will allow students to gain a certain awareness of their own cultural
identity and its defining characteristics. Measuring oneself with “the other” brings into play numerous
dimensions and perspectives that feed on diversity and encourage reflection, skills and effective attitudes. In
this sense, the school promotes harmonious and integral development, growth, and the full realization of
people, by forming them solidly both on a cognitive and cultural level.
The challenge of teaching culture and language together probably will not be simple, but the point is that only
speaking a foreign language does not guarantee success in communication with different cultures.
FINAL REMARKS
Language is people’s primary resource to communicate and build social relations, is what individuals use to
express themselves, their thoughts and identity but, noticeably, it is not sufficient within multicultural contexts
where the need to interact with people having a different cultural background is concrete. Language teaching
must offer a knowledge of the world that students can use to develop their personal and cultural identity, via
contact with many different discourses and cultural representations" [28]. Certainly, some questions arise from
all these considerations, in terms of pedagogical innovation, didactic and methodological approaches used by
teachers and the necessary requirements. However, it could be significant to consider new teaching models
contemplating linguistic, cultural, and metalinguistic elements to guarantee a complete set of competences both
to learners and teachers. Moreover, teachers should no longer have teaching units that focus on the word,
sentence or a paragraph, but rather target individuals’ action and agency within a foreign community [29]. It
would include teaching sociocultural pragmatics to enable the learners to move away from a monocultural
national identity and to learn how to construct multiple cultural identities simultaneously: within this we can
also hypothesize the teaching of nonverbal communication within a broader language learning program. We
can assume a cross-disciplinary approach to foreign language instruction without missing the purposes of
developing linguistic competence in foreign language learners. Therefore, the need is to come across further
studies and research on this topic, that encourage and promote language learning not merely as a
communicative practice but also as a cultural activity which includes learning some nonverbal communication
signals to support the effectiveness of words.
REFERENCES
1. D.H. Hymes, Vers la compétence de communication. Paris : Didier, 2004.
2. N. Bonvillain, Language, culture and communication: the meaning of messages. New York: Prentice
Hall, 2019.
3. S. Pinker, The Language Instinct. How the Mind Creates Language. New York: Harper Perennial
Modern Classics, 2015.
4. M.R. Brown, Starting from scratch. New York: Bantam, 1989.
Page 9724
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
5. M. Pajević, D. Nowell Smith (eds.). "Thinking Language: Wilhelm von Humboldt Now", Special Issue
of Forum for Modern Language Studies, vol 53, n. 1, 2017, pp. 1-6.
6. J. Coneth, G. Meier, The Multilingual Turn in Languages Education. Opportunities and Challenges.
London: Multilingual Matters, 2014.
7. J. T. Wood, Communication in our lives (4th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning, 2014.
8. V. De Blasi, M. Manca, A. Vitale, Introduzione alla psicologia. Roma: Alpes Italia, 2018.
9. C. Ling, On Innate Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Research of Humanities and Social Sciences,
vol. 4, n. 28, 2014, pp. 97-100.
10. H. Parret, Discussing Language: Dialogues with Wallace L. Chafe, Noam Chomsky, Algirdas J.
Greimas, M. A. K. Halliday, Peter Hartmann, George Lakoff, Sydney M. Lamb, André Martinet, James
McCawley, Sebastian K. Saumjan, Jacques Bouveresse. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2017.
11. J. Piaget, The Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 2023.
12. T. Worton, Paralanguage, London: Routledge, 2016.
13. P. Watzlawick, J. H. Beavin, D. D. Jackson, Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W. W.
Norton, 2011.
14. J. White, D. B. Givens, The Routledge Dictionary of Nonverbal Communication, London: Routledge,
2021.
15. A. Hans, E. Hans, Kinesics, Haptics and Proxemics: aspects of Non-Verbal Communication. IOSR
Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 20, n. 2, 2015, pp. 4752.
16. C. N. de Melo, P. J. Carnevale, S. J., Read, J. Gratch, Reading people’s minds from emotion
expressions in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 106,
n. 1, 2014, pp. 7388.
17. L. Brambilla, La comunicazione non verbale. Milano: Fag editore, 2020.
18. G. Zoric, K. Smid, I. S. Pandzic, Facial Gestures: Taxonomy and Application of Non-Verbal, Non-
Emotional Facial Displays for Embodied Conversational Agents. Conversational Informatics: An
Engineering Approach, vol 1, n. 1, 2007, pp. 161182.
19. D. Matsumoto, Nonverbal Communication: Science and Applications. London: Sage, 2020.
20. J. M. Valdes, Culture bound: bridging the cultural gap in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1986.
21. Zhu Hua, Exploring Intercultural Communication. Language in Action, London: Routledge, 2013.
22. Y. T. Johnston, I. Sachdev, Intercultural communicative competence: exploring English language
teachers' beliefs and practices. Language awareness, vol. 20, n. 2, 2011, pp. 81-96.
23. S. Karpava (ed.), Multilingualism and Multiculturalism in Language Education, London: Springer
Nature, 2025.
24. Zhu Hua, Exploring Intercultural Communication. Language in Action, London: Routledge, 2013.
25. Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication. Hoboken: Wiley,
2017.
26. S. Karpava (ed.), Multilingualism and Multiculturalism in Language Education, London: Springer
Nature, 2025.
27. G. Maugeri G. Serragiotto, Lo sviluppo della competenza interculturale nell’insegnamento delle lingue
attraverso la letteratura. In Cross-Disciplinary Dialogues, Toronto: Legas, 2024.
28. X. Fang, “Chinese English teachers' attitudes towards a multicultural approach to English language
teaching in China's college classrooms”, Taiwan Journal of TESOL, vol. 19, n. 2, 2022, pp. 145-174.
29. S. Chen, T. T. Le, Teaching of culture in English as an International Language: An Integrated Model.
London and New York: Routledge, 2019.