Page 9725
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Multimodality in Digital Collaboration: Exploring eTwinning in ITE
for Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication and
Pedagogical Design
Aneta Naumoska
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0740
Received: 04 December 2025; Accepted: 10 December 2025; Published: 16 December 2025
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates how multimodality functions within eTwinning projects in Initial Teacher Education
(ITE) and how these practices prepare pre-service English language teachers for digitally connected and
intercultural classrooms. The objectives of the study are to clarify how multimodal meaning-making is enacted
through eTwinning collaboration, to analyze the support that eTwinning ITE Ambassadors and teacher
educators provide, and to propose strategies for embedding multimodal project work into higher education
curricula. This paper follows a conceptual and exploratory research design, drawing on social semiotics,
sociocultural theory, and intercultural communicative competence. Through policy reports, peer reviewed
studies and documented cases from European institutions it identifies patterns, challenges, and opportunities in
current practice. It is shown that eTwinning projects generate rich multimodal artefacts, such as digital stories,
infographics, virtual exhibitions, and collaborative videos. These tasks foster digital literacy, creativity, and
intercultural awareness, and they give pre-service teachers hands on experience with tools and communication
practices common in contemporary ELT. This paper further concludes that ITE Ambassadors and teacher
educators play a decisive scaffolding role as they train students in multimodal tools, support pedagogical
design, mediate intercultural communication, and help integrate eTwinning into course structures. Despite clear
benefits, certain challenges do persist, including uneven digital competence, limited institutional support,
superficial uses of multimodality, and restrictive curricula. The paper concludes that eTwinning offers a strong
framework for integrating multimodal, collaborative, and intercultural pedagogy into teacher preparation.
Lasting impact, however, depends on systematic curriculum integration, clear assessment criteria, and
institutional recognition of ITE Ambassador and teacher educator roles. The study outlines future research
needs and provides practical recommendations for strengthening multimodal eTwinning implementation in
ITE.
Keywords: eTwinning; multimodality; initial teacher education; digital literacy; innovative pedagogy
INTRODUCTION
The integration of digital technologies into teacher education has transformed how pre-service teachers learn,
communicate, and prepare for professional practice. Within the field of English Language Teaching (ELT),
these changes are particularly significant, since language itself is inherently multimodal and communicative,
and the digital era has expanded both the modes and contexts in which the English language is used. For
teacher educators and pre-service teachers alike, the challenge is not only to master technological tools but also
to develop the pedagogical vision required to employ them meaningfully in classrooms that are increasingly
diverse, intercultural, and digitally connected.
Against this backdrop, eTwinning, the European Commission’s platform for school networking and
collaborative projects, has emerged as a powerful mechanism for promoting digital collaboration, intercultural
learning, and professional development across Europe. Since its launch in 2005, eTwinning has enabled
teachers and students to participate in cross-border projects, fostering both digital literacy and cultural
awareness (Gilleran 2019). While traditionally associated with primary and secondary schools, its integration
Page 9726
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
into Initial Teacher Education (ITE) has gained momentum in recent years, aiming to equip pre-service
teachers with the competences required for 21st-century teaching (European Commission 2023b). A central
element of this process is the work of eTwinning ITE Ambassadors, experienced teacher educators and
academics who embed eTwinning in higher education (HE), mentor student teachers, and support teacher
educators in designing eTwinning-based activities. The Ambassadors’ role extends beyond promotion, i.e. they
act as pedagogical guides who model collaborative practices, foster professional networking, and encourage
reflective approaches to digital pedagogy (Belic Malin2025). Yet despite their growing prominence, limited
scholarly attention has been paid to their contribution, particularly in relation to multimodality, or the use of
multiple semiotic resources such as text, image, sound, gesture, and digital media to construct meaning (Kress
2010; Jewitt 2014).
Multimodality is especially relevant to ELT and ITE. Research shows that multimodal approaches deepen
communicative competence, enhance creativity, and enable learners to express meaning through diverse
representational forms (Kalantzis and Cope 2020; Jewitt 2014). In collaborative environments such as
eTwinning, multimodality is not a supplement but a central practice: projects frequently involve digital
storytelling, collaborative videos, infographics, and virtual exhibitions, among other things, each requiring the
integration of multimodal literacies. Understanding how eTwinning supports such practices in ITE, and how
Ambassadors and teacher educators scaffold them, is therefore crucial for ELT practitioners.
Despite this relevance, gaps remain. Research has mainly addressed eTwinning’s impact on professional
development (Huertas-Abril et al. 2025), its integration into ITE (Napal-Fraile et al. 2024; Tosi 2023), and
student teachers experiences with collaboration (Gülbay 2018). Yet few studies explicitly explore
multimodality in eTwinning-based ITE, and fewer still analyze the Ambassador’s and teacher educator’s role.
Furthermore, while countries such as Italy, Spain, and Turkey feature prominently in research, smaller
contexts, such as North Macedonia, remain underrepresented.
This paper addresses these gaps by examining the intersection of multimodality, eTwinning, and ITE. Framed
within the European context, it synthesises existing scholarship while offering practice-oriented
recommendations. Its aims are threefold: to conceptualise the role of multimodality in eTwinning-based
collaboration for pre-service ELT teachers; to analyze the Ambassador’s and teacher educator’s role in
scaffolding multimodal practices in HE; and to propose strategies for embedding multimodal eTwinning
projects in ITE curricula. The study’s significance lies in its contribution to both scholarship and practice: for
researchers, it highlights an underexplored nexus and future directions for inquiry; for practitioners, it offers a
framework for designing multimodal, collaborative projects that prepare student teachers to create inclusive,
intercultural, and technologically enriched classrooms.
CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Multimodality in education
The concept of multimodality has become increasingly central to discussions of pedagogy in the digital age.
Rooted in social semiotics (Kress 2010; Jewitt 2014), multimodality refers to the idea that meaning is
constructed not only through language but also through a range of semiotic resources, including images,
gestures, sounds, spatial arrangements, and digital media. The so-called “multimodal turn” (Jewitt 2014)
recognises that language is almost always co-deployed with other semiotic systems, and that meaning is made
multimodally through the orchestration of these diverse resources. Within education, multimodality highlights
the diverse ways in which learners engage with and represent knowledge. For language education, it is
particularly significant, as teachers must attend not only to written and spoken language but also to visual,
auditory, and interactive dimensions of communication. As Kalantzis and Cope (2020) note, 21st-century
literacy is inherently multimodal, requiring learners to interpret and produce hybrid texts that combine words,
visuals, audio, and interactive features. In this sense, multimodality is not an optional extension but a
fundamental dimension of communicative competence.
In practice, multimodal pedagogy involves the design of tasks and environments in which learners actively
combine modes to construct meaning. Examples include digital storytelling projects that integrate narrative,
Page 9727
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
images, and music; collaborative infographics that present research visually; or podcasts and video essays that
combine spoken commentary with visual evidence. Such practices resonate strongly with constructivist and
socio-cultural theories of learning, which emphasise active knowledge construction and socially mediated
interaction (Vygotsky 1978). The rise of digital technologies has expanded opportunities for multimodal
meaning-making: online platforms easily allow the integration of text, video, audio, and interactive features,
making multimodality the norm rather than the exception. Yet, as Laurillard (2012) cautions, technology alone
does not ensure learning; what matters is the pedagogical design underpinning its use. Hampel and Stickler
(2015) likewise stress that online collaboration requires careful orchestration of interaction patterns,
scaffolding mechanisms, and tools to enable co-construction of knowledge. Similarly, Cannelli (2021)
emphasises that teachers should provide students with multimodal contexts, such as blogs, podcasts, and
interactive webpages, that foster proficiency in digital communication, intercultural interaction, and mediation.
Within HE, digital collaborative projects play a powerful role in developing professional skills for pre-service
teachers. They encourage future educators to experience the pedagogical affordances of technology first-hand,
to plan collaboratively, and to reflect critically on intercultural and multimodal communication as this will be
their imminent future. Importantly, the integration of multimodality into ELT cannot be separated from the
goal of fostering intercultural communicative competence (ICC). Defined by Byram (1997) as the ability to
interact effectively and appropriately with people from different cultural backgrounds, ICC has long been a
core objective of language education. In digital contexts, ICC is extended: learners must interpret and produce
meaning across diverse semiotic modes and in intercultural online environments. Multimodality enhances ICC
by offering multiple channels for expressing identity, perspective, and culture (Kramsch 1993; Moeller and
Nugent 2014). Digital storytelling, for instance, allows learners to weave language together with images and
background music that reflect cultural values; collaborative infographics require negotiation of both content
and visual form; and videoconferencing demands attention not only to words but also to gesture, tone, and
visual cues.
From a teacher education perspective, exposing pre-service teachers to multimodal and intercultural
collaboration is essential. As Dooly and Sadler (2016) note, future teachers must be prepared to design tasks
that transcend the traditional text-based and teacher-centred classroom and to facilitate learning experiences
that reflect the complex communicative realities of the 21st century. In this sense, multimodality is not merely
a pedagogical trend but a foundational principle for rethinking ELT in HE.
eTwinning as a framework for digital multimodal collaboration in HE
eTwinning provides a unique context in which multimodality and digital collaboration converge. Established in
2005 under the European Commissions eLearning programme and being fully integrated into the European
Union's Lifelong Learning Programme since 2007, eTwinning enables schools and teachers across Europe to
collaborate on projects using an online platform. Teachers design projects, connect with partners from the same
country or preferably from a different country, and facilitate student collaboration, often resulting in rich
multimodal outputs or artefacts, such as joint blogs, digital posters, short films, and online exhibitions.
From a theoretical perspective, eTwinning aligns with socio-constructivist and connectivist frameworks. Socio-
constructivism emphasises learning as a socially situated activity, in which knowledge is co-constructed
through interaction (Vygotsky 1978). Connectivism, as articulated by Siemens (2005), highlights the role of
networks and digital tools in shaping contemporary learning. eTwinning projects, which depend on
networking, collaboration, and digital production, exemplify both frameworks.
In HE, for pre-service teachers, participation in eTwinning offers two overlapping benefits. First, it provides
direct experience of digital collaborative pedagogy, allowing them to freely experiment with task design,
assessment, and classroom integration. Second, it fosters the development of multimodal literacies, as projects
routinely require integration of text, visuals, sound, and interactive elements. These experiences not only
enhance digital and intercultural competences but also prepare pre-service teachers to replicate similar
practices in their future classrooms.
Page 9728
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
The successful integration of eTwinning in ITE does not occur spontaneously, but rather it requires advocacy,
guidance, and professional scaffolding. This is where the role of eTwinning ITE Ambassadors and teacher
educators becomes critical. Ambassadors are experienced teachers or academics in HE who are formally
designated to promote eTwinning within HE institutions, mentor pre-service teachers, and collaborate with
teacher educators to embed eTwinning activities into curricula (European Commission 2023b). They serve as
mediators between policy and practice. On the one hand, they interpret European policy initiatives for local
contexts, ensuring alignment with national curricula and HE priorities. On the other hand, they work closely
with student teachers, modeling how to design and implement collaborative projects, and providing hands-on
training in multimodal and digital tools (Belic Malinić 2025). Their dual role makes them key agents in
translating the potential of eTwinning into actual practice within universities.
Regarding multimodality, both eTwinning ITE Ambassadors and teacher educators occupy a crucial
scaffolding role. While pre-service teachers typically possess basic digital skills, they frequently lack the
pedagogical vision and principled objectives necessary to design tasks that integrate multiple semiotic modes
in meaningful and authentic ways. Ambassadors and teacher educators therefore provide not only technical
training but also opportunities for critical reflection, guiding future teachers to move beyond superficial uses of
visual elements or technology. In doing so, they encourage student teachers to consider how multimodal
designs shape processes of learning, communication, and intercultural understanding. The case of North
Macedonia offers a relevant illustration. Although relatively new to eTwinning in ITE, the two principal state
universities (Ss Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, and Goce Delcev in Štip) have adopted and embedded
eTwinning projects within teacher education courses and participated in European-level ITE initiatives since
2019 and 2024, respectively, with an ITE Ambassador from the former University. This highlights both the
opportunities and the challenges of integrating eTwinning into a national HE system where the majority of
teacher educators remain hesitant or disengaged, yet where the potential for fostering intercultural collaboration
is considerable.
While the theoretical foundations of multimodality, digital collaboration, and intercultural competence are well
established, their intersection within eTwinning-based ITE remains underexplored. Existing studies highlight
the benefits of eTwinning for teacher education (Napal-Fraile et al. 2024; Tosi 2023) and document
Ambassadors’ contributions to professional development (Belic Malinić 2025; Huertas-Abril et al. 2025),
however, systematic investigation into how multimodality is enacted, scaffolded, and reflected upon within
eTwinning ITE projects is much more limited.
This gap is particularly evident in the ELT field. Although multimodal pedagogy has been widely discussed in
language education (Jewitt 2014; Kalantzis and Cope 2020), little attention has been paid to how ELT pre-
service teachers engage in multimodal collaboration through platforms like eTwinning, and how ITE
Ambassadors and teacher educators guide this engagement. Moreover, the diversity of European contexts, with
smaller states like North Macedonia still emerging in the literature, requires further exploration to understand
how eTwinning practices adapt to different HE environments. This paper positions itself at this intersection,
aiming to articulate both the theoretical rationale and the practical pathways for integrating multimodal
eTwinning projects into ELT teacher education.
LITERATURE REVIEW
eTwinning in HE
Although eTwinning was originally designed as a networking initiative for schools, its extension into HE,
particularly in the domain of ITE, represents one of the most significant developments of recent years. As the
European Commission (2019b) notes, the platform has evolved from a project-based tool for school
partnerships into a professional development space for teachers at all career stages. For HE institutions,
eTwinning offers a structured yet flexible way of embedding international collaboration, intercultural dialogue,
and digital pedagogy into curricula.
The European Commission’s 2023 Monitoring Report on the Impact of eTwinning on ITE highlights the scale
of this development. Over 400 HE institutions across Europe have now integrated eTwinning into their teacher
Page 9729
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
education programmes (European Commission 2023b). The rationale is clear: exposing pre-service teachers to
collaborative, intercultural, and digitally mediated pedagogies better prepares them for the realities of 21st-
century classrooms.
Several empirical studies support this trajectory. Napal-Fraile et al. (2024), in a study of pre-service science
teachers in Spain, Italy, and Poland, found that participation in eTwinning projects enhanced digital
competence, teamwork skills, and openness to intercultural collaboration. Gülbay (2018) similarly showed how
the Teacher Training Institutes pilot programme enabled more than 500 undergraduates to join cross-border
projects, which they perceived as beneficial for professional development and future practice. Beyond Europe,
Basantes (2025) reported that adapting eTwinning in Latin America improved pre-service teachers’
communicative competence in English and fostered intercultural sensitivity. From a European standpoint, Paz-
Albo and López Cirugeda (2017) argued that eTwinning represents a future-oriented framework for initial
teacher training but warned that sustainability depends solely on embedding it institutionally rather than relying
on individual initiative.
Despite such evidence, challenges remain. The EVALUATE Group (2019), examining virtual exchange more
broadly, identified barriers such as limited institutional support, inadequate digital infrastructure, and
variability in teacher educators’ readiness to use collaborative tools. These issues are directly relevant to
eTwinning. As Paz-Albo and López Cirugeda (2017) emphasise, unless eTwinning aligns systematically with
curricular objectives, its impact risks remaining peripheral.
Within the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), ITE is seen as a critical stage for embedding
competences in digital pedagogy, intercultural awareness, and innovative strategies (European Commission
2023b). eTwinning contributes to these objectives by functioning, in Tosi’s (2023) words, as a ‘living
laboratory where pre-service teachers design and implement collaborative cross-cultural projects. Such
experiences foster digital literacy, insights into intercultural classrooms, and the pedagogical use of multimodal
resources. Research confirms that ITE students value these opportunities: Huertas-Abril et al (2025) discovered
that student teachers benefited from authentic communication, multimodal task design, and intercultural
collaboration. These findings align with wider calls for experiential, practice-based teacher education (Darling-
Hammond 2017; Huertas-Abril and Muszyńska 2022).
Yet integrating eTwinning into ITE is not without obstacles. Rigid curricula often leave little space for
creativity and external projects, teacher educators may lack familiarity with the platform or simply show lack
of interest, and students may struggle with time management or intercultural dialogue. These challenges
underscore the importance of eTwinning ITE Ambassadors, introduced to bridge policy and practice.
Ambassadors, often academics, mentor pre-service teachers, support teacher educators, represent institutions at
European events, and embed eTwinning into curricula (Belic Malinić 2025). In practice, they act as facilitators
of multimodal pedagogy, intercultural mediators, and policy translators.
Research on ITE Ambassadors is still emerging. Belic Malinić (2025) portrays them as teacher leaders
fostering professional learning communities, while Huertas-Abril et al. (2025) show that Ambassadors view
eTwinning as effective for enhancing EFL skills through multimodal, collaborative tasks. Systematic
evaluation still remains limited, with most studies relying on small-scale qualitative data. Questions about
long-term curricular impact and institutional transformation therefore remain open.
Multimodality in eTwinning projects
The intersection of multimodality and eTwinning has attracted growing, though still limited, scholarly
attention. At the school level, numerous reports describe eTwinning projects that involve multimodal outputs,
such as collaborative films, digital exhibitions, and e-magazines. These outputs demonstrate how
multimodality fosters creativity, engagement, and deeper learning, allowing pupils to express themselves in
ways that transcend linguistic competence alone (Dooly and Sadler 2016; European Commission 2019a;
2019b; 2020; 2021a; 2022a; 2023a). At the ITE level, however, the literature remains comparatively sparse.
Napal-Fraile et al. (2024) observed that pre-service teachers valued the multimodal nature of eTwinning
projects, which enabled them to present science concepts through videos, visualisations, and interactive
Page 9730
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
posters. Tosi (2023) similarly emphasised that multimodal design was central to student teachers’ engagement
and learning. Yet neither study explored multimodality as its primary focus, leaving an analytical gap.
Within the field of ELT, multimodal approaches have long been recognised as essential for the development of
communicative competence (Cannelli 2021; Jewitt 2014; Kalantzis and Cope 2020). Still, studies explicitly
linking multimodality to eTwinning-based ITE in ELT remain very limited. Huertas-Abril et al. (2025) do note
that Ambassadors and teacher educators often employ multimodal strategies to scaffold EFL learning but
stopped short of providing detailed empirical analysis of how these strategies impact student teachers’
pedagogical design.
More recently, research has highlighted the relationship between eTwinning, multimodality, and digital literacy
development. Huertas-Abril and Palacios-Hidalgo (2023a) reported that student teachers participating in cross-
border eTwinning projects developed stronger awareness of the pedagogical value of multimodal texts but also
faced difficulties in aligning digital tools with communicative objectives. Their findings suggest that while
multimodality is appreciated, it often remains under-theorised in teacher education contexts. Similarly,
Huertas-Abril and Muszyńska (2022) showed how eTwinning tools facilitate social and curriculum integration
through multimodal communication, stressing that pre-service teachers benefit from collaborative tasks in
which they co-construct meaning using text, visuals, and audio.
In addition to digital competence, multimodality also supports the development of intercultural awareness.
Huertas-Abril and Palacios-Hidalgo (2023b) found that collaborative online learning within eTwinning
provided pre-service teachers with spaces for intercultural reflection mediated by multimodal resources,
enabling participants to negotiate meaning across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Their findings confirm
Hampel and Stickler’s (2015) broader argument that multimodal tasks in online teaching environments require
careful scaffolding, since students must manage a complex interplay of verbal, visual, and paralinguistic cues.
Taken together, these studies indicate that multimodality within eTwinning contributes to digital literacy,
intercultural competence, and creative engagement, but also suffers from fragmented implementation. While
research consistently acknowledges multimodality as a powerful affordance, it often remains a secondary
theme, lacking systematic theorisation or detailed analysis. This analytical gap is particularly evident in ELT-
focused ITE contexts, where multimodal practices are common but not yet comprehensively studied. This
absence of systematic research in fact presents an opportunity. As Dooly and Sadler (2016) note in the broader
context of virtual exchange, multimodality should not be treated as a by-product of digital projects but as a
central analytical lens. Applying this lens to eTwinning ITE projects could reveal how pre-service teachers
conceptualise multimodal pedagogy, how Ambassadors and teacher educators scaffold multimodal
competence, and how such practices translate into classroom application.
To sum up, the literature reviewed highlights three key gaps: (1) Multimodality in eTwinning ITE remains
underexplored. While multimodal outputs are common, few studies analyze them systematically, especially in
ELT contexts; (2) The role of ITE Ambassadors is insufficiently theorised. Although Ambassadors are
recognised as important, research rarely examines their scaffolding practices in depth as compared to teacher
educators; (3) National contexts beyond major EU countries are underrepresented. Countries like North
Macedonia demonstrate active involvement, though their practices are rarely documented in the scholarly
literature and the reasons why the majority of teacher educators in the country remain hesitant or disengaged is
yet unknown.
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
Research orientation and conceptual framework
This paper is conceived as a conceptual and exploratory study that combines both research-oriented and
practice-oriented perspectives. It synthesises existing literature, policy documents, and case studies on
eTwinning, multimodality, and ITE, while also integrating insights from practice. In doing so, it highlights
concrete examples of multimodal pedagogical design enacted in HE contexts and proposes strategies for ELT
practitioners. This dual orientation reflects the nature of the topic itself. On the one hand, scholarly work on
Page 9731
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
multimodality and eTwinning remains underdeveloped, requiring conceptual synthesis to define frameworks
for future research. On the other hand, eTwinning is a practitioner-driven initiative: its success depends on how
teacher educators, Ambassadors, and institutions adopt it in practice. Accordingly, the paper situates itself at
the intersection of research and professional development, wanting to inform both academic discourse and
teaching practice.
The analysis is guided by three exploratory research questions that aim to identify patterns, gaps, and future
directions rather than provide definitive answers: How is multimodality conceptualised and enacted within
eTwinning projects in ITE, particularly in ELT? What role do Ambassadors and teacher educators play in
scaffolding multimodal practices for pre-service teachers in HE? What strategies can be proposed for
integrating multimodal eTwinning projects into ITE curricula across Europe, including smaller contexts such
as North Macedonia?
The paper draws on three overlapping theoretical frameworks. First, Social Semiotics and Multimodality
(Kress 2010; Jewitt 2014) explain how meaning is constructed across modes and how semiotic resources are
orchestrated in digital collaboration. Second, Sociocultural Theory (Vygotsky 1978) frames learning as socially
mediated, highlighting scaffolding by Ambassadors and teacher educators. Third, ICC (Byram 1997) situates
multimodal collaboration within the wider goal of intercultural dialogue in ELT and eTwinning.
The study engages with a wide range of secondary sources that combine policy, research, and practice,
enabling triangulation across perspectives. Open access policy reports published by the European Commission
document the evolution of eTwinning in general and its specific integration into ITE, positioning ITE within
the broader European agenda for professional development, digital innovation, and intercultural education.
Alongside policy reports, the peer-reviewed research provides growing evidence of eTwinning’s pedagogical
potential. Napal-Fraile et al. (2024) and lbay (2018) highlight its role in enhancing pre-service teachers’
digital and teamwork competences, while Huertas-Abril and Muszyńska (2022) show its contribution to
curriculum integration through multimodal communication. Huertas-Abril and Palacios-Hidalgo (2023a) stress
the need for sustained scaffolding in developing digital literacy, and Paz-Albo and López Cirugeda (2017)
caution that eTwinning must be institutionally embedded to avoid remaining peripheral. Comparative insights
come from Basantes (2025), who reports improved communicative competence and intercultural sensitivity in
Latin American HE contexts. Additional perspectives are offered by Dooly and Sadler (2016) on project-based
multimodal learning, Darling-Hammond (2017) on global teacher education reforms, and Tosi (2023) on
embedding eTwinning systematically into curricula. Together, these contributions confirm eTwinning’s
potential but also highlight the challenges of sustainability and institutionalisation.
Analytical strategy
The analysis follows a thematic synthesis approach, adapted for conceptual review. Sources are examined to
identify recurring themes related to the research questions, such as the affordances of multimodality in
eTwinning projects, pedagogical functions of Ambassadors and teacher educators in HE, challenges and
opportunities specific to ITE contexts, and gaps in research and practice, particularly regarding
underrepresented European contexts. This synthesis enables both conceptual contributions (clarifying how
multimodality and Ambassador roles intersect) and practical implications (suggesting models and strategies for
integration into ELT teacher education).
As with any conceptual review, limitations must be acknowledged. First, the absence of primary empirical data
means that conclusions are interpretative rather than definitive. Future studies should include classroom
observations, interviews with pre-service teachers, and systematic evaluations of projects to provide empirical
grounding. Second, while the paper draws on European-level and country-specific sources, coverage is
inevitably uneven: well-documented contexts such as Spain and Italy are more represented than smaller
systems like North Macedonia, where published research remains limited. Third, the focus on ELT reflects the
intended audience but may overlook insights from other subject areas where eTwinning is used differently.
Nonetheless, these limitations do not diminish the value of the study. On the contrary, they highlight the need
for precisely the kind of agenda-setting work this paper seeks to accomplish. By articulating key themes, gaps,
and strategies, this paper provides a foundation for future empirical research and for immediate practical
Page 9732
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
applications in teacher education. In proposing recommendations, this paper is careful not to prescribe uniform
solutions but to acknowledge the diversity of contexts, resources, and institutional cultures across Europe.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
How multimodality is enacted in eTwinning projects in HE
Across Europe, eTwinning projects regularly generate multimodal artefacts, or digital products that combine
linguistic, visual, auditory, and interactive modes of meaning-making. These artefacts function not as
decorative additions but as pedagogical outputs, requiring pre-service teachers to reflect on how content is
represented across modes. In this process, student teachers as participants gain experience in designing
resources they might later employ in ELT classrooms, where multimodal learning materials are increasingly
the norm. Examples include digital storytelling videos in which student teachers narrate cultural traditions
while integrating images, background music, and subtitles (Huertas-Abril et al. 2025); collaboratively designed
infographics and posters summarising research on language teaching methods, produced with tools such as
Canva (Napal-Fraile et al. 2024); or virtual exhibitions or blogs where lesson plans, podcasts, and interactive
quizzes are shared and commented on across institutions (Tosi 2023).
Beyond the artefacts themselves, eTwinning projects embody multimodality in their processes. Communication
unfolds through text-based forums, video conferencing, image sharing, and collaborative editing platforms,
requiring participants to navigate multiple semiotic channels simultaneously. This is the place where
Ambassadors and teacher educators can demonstrate what peer feedback is and how it should be done. Hampel
and Stickler (2015) argue that online collaboration demands careful orchestration of diverse communication
modes, and eTwinning exemplifies this complexity. For pre-service ELT teachers, such experiences act as
a pedagogical apprenticeship, reflecting the communicative demands of future classrooms where teachers must
coordinate written, spoken, and visual input in both physical and online environments.
Studies highlight three recurring benefits of multimodal engagement in eTwinning. First, enhanced digital
literacy: pre-service teachers gain competence in using digital tools for creating multimodal artefacts (Cannelli
2021; Napal-Fraile et al. 2024). Second, creativity and engagement: multimodal tasks motivate learners and
allow for imaginative representations of content (Huertas-Abril et al. 2025). Third, intercultural dialogue:
multimodal resources enable the sharing of cultural narratives in richer, more accessible ways, transcending
linguistic barriers through visuals, music, and symbols (Belic Malinić 2025). For ELT, these findings confirm
that multimodal project design should be positioned centrally within teacher preparation.
The role of eTwinning ITE Ambassadors and teacher educators is crucial in scaffolding such practices.
Drawing on Vygotskian sociocultural theory, they can be seen as mediators supporting student teachers within
their zone of proximal development (Vygotsky 1978). While many pre-service teachers are adept at social
media and digital tools, they often lack experience in applying them pedagogically. Ambassadors bridge this
gap by proactively providing training workshops on multimodal tools, moderating online groups where
projects are shared and given feedback on, and fostering reflection on how multimodal choices shape meaning
in ELT contexts. Huertas-Abril et al. (2025) note that Ambassadors frequently highlight how multimodal tasks
strengthen EFL learners’ listening and speaking skills, with visual support aiding comprehension. Belic
Malinić (2025) further characterises Ambassadors as a form of teacher leadership, combining mentorship and
advocacy. Within the domain of multimodality, this leadership entails cultivating a culture of innovation,
persuading institutions and colleagues to value collaborative, multimodal pedagogy as an essential contribution
to HE, where curricular reform often lags behind pedagogical innovation.
Challenges in implementing multimodality through eTwinning in ITE
Despite its potential, multimodal collaboration faces persistent technological obstacles. Unequal access to
reliable internet, insufficient institutional infrastructure, and limited familiarity with digital tools can hinder
participation (The EVALUATE Group 2019). These barriers are intensified in smaller or less resourced
contexts, where resource constraints may be particularly acute, making the Ambassador’s and teacher
educator’s role in providing technological and pedagogical support even more critical. Huertas-Abril and
Page 9733
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Palacios-Hidalgo (2023a) similarly observed that pre-service teachers’ uneven digital literacy limited the depth
of multimodal engagement, noting that access to training in eTwinning tools was often decisive in determining
whether students could design meaningful digital artefacts.
Pedagogical design represents another significant hurdle. As Laurillard (2012) has stated, effective digital
pedagogy requires intentional structuring of tasks, not merely access to technological tools. Huertas-Abril and
Palacios-Hidalgo (2023a) note that Ambassadors and teacher educators play a pivotal role in advancing pre-
service teachers’ digital literacy, though the impact is uneven across institutions, since digital competences are
closely tied to the presence of mentors who scaffold the pedagogical use of multimodal resources. Of course,
broader and more systematic research is required to assess how their efforts translate into lasting
transformations in teacher education. In addition, pre-service teachers may struggle to design multimodal
activities that are pedagogically coherent rather than merely visually attractive. In a comparative study across
two universities, Huertas-Abril and Palacios-Hidalgo (ibid) found that pre-service teachers tended to privilege
surface-level aesthetics, such as choosing colourful templates or images, over carefully aligning multimodal
resources with communicative and linguistic objectives. Ambassadors and teacher educators frequently report
similar challenges: students often approach multimodality superficially, focusing on decoration rather than
meaningful integration (Huertas-Abril et al. 2025).
Curricular and institutional constraints further limit the systematic use of eTwinning in ITE. HE curricula often
leave little room for external projects, and teacher educators may be reluctant to adopt eTwinning due to
workload, not being paid, assessment requirements, or unfamiliarity with the platform. Without institutional
recognition, Ambassadors and teacher educators may find their efforts isolated. Tosi (2023) argues that genuine
integration of eTwinning requires alignment with institutional strategies and credit-bearing coursework.
Huertas-Abril and Muszyńska (2022) reinforce this point, stressing that without curricular anchoring,
multimodal collaboration risks remaining peripheral, as pre-service teachers already struggle to balance project
demands with formal course requirements. They found that while Ambassadors and teacher educators promote
the integration of multimodal eTwinning tools into both social and curricular dimensions, their influence often
depends on individual initiative rather than institutional policy, highlighting a structural weakness in sustaining
innovation.
Finally, intercultural communication itself can present difficulties. Misunderstandings due to culture, differing
expectations, and linguistic barriers frequently arise in cross-national projects. While such moments can
provide valuable learning opportunities, they require careful facilitation in order for things not to get out of
control. Ambassadors and teacher educators often step in as mediators, helping students reflect on intercultural
encounters and reframe challenges as part of the learning process (Belic Malinić 2025). Research confirms this
dynamic: Huertas-Abril and Palacios-Hidalgo (2023b) note that although international collaboration fostered
greater intercultural awareness, it also revealed tensions in negotiating communication styles and academic
expectations, which demanded reflective guidance from both Ambassadors and teacher educators. In this sense,
intercultural challenges cannot be considered merely obstacles but rather opportunities for fostering critical
awareness, provided that scaffolding mechanisms are in place.
These findings suggest that while multimodality in eTwinning ITE offers rich potential for enhancing digital
competence, creativity, and intercultural awareness, its implementation is constrained by technological
inequities, pedagogical inexperience, curricular rigidity, and intercultural complexity. Addressing these
challenges requires a coordinated effort at multiple levels: Ambassadors and teacher educators must scaffold
both technical and reflective practice, embedding multimodal collaboration into curricula as much as they can,
while institutions must provide systemic support to ensure that such projects are sustainable.
Implications for ELT practitioners in HE
For ELT practitioners, one clear implication is the need to prepare student teachers for classrooms where
multimodality is the norm. Language teaching increasingly involves integrating video, audio, images, and
interactive tasks, particularly in online and blended environments. eTwinning projects offer authentic practice
in designing and implementing such tasks; hence Ambassadors and teacher educators can embed eTwinning
activities in methodology courses in order to illustrate principles of task design, communicative competence,
and intercultural awareness.
Page 9734
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Beyond technical skills, ELT practitioners should emphasise critical reflection. Multimodality is not just about
using multiple modes but about understanding how modes shape meaning, identity, and power (Jewitt 2014).
Pre-service teachers should be encouraged to reflect critically on questions such as: How do visuals support or
constrain language learning? How do multimodal tasks include or exclude learners from diverse backgrounds?
How can multimodal projects foster intercultural understanding rather than generalising and stereotyping?
Such reflection aligns with the broader goal of cultivating critical digital literacy, a competence identified as
essential in European education policy (European Commission 2019b; 2021b; 2022b).
Finally, sustainability is crucial. For multimodal eTwinning projects to have lasting impact in ITE, they must
be systematically integrated into curricula rather than treated as extracurricular extensions. This requires
institutional recognition, credit allocation, and alignment with teacher education standards. ELT practitioners
can advocate for this integration by demonstrating the alignment of multimodal eTwinning projects with
learning outcomes in communicative competence, intercultural awareness, and digital pedagogy.
The findings and discussion highlight how multimodality is both an outcome and a process of eTwinning
projects in ITE. Ambassadors and teacher educators play a vital role in scaffolding multimodal practices,
mediating intercultural dialogue, and embedding projects into HE. However, challenges remain at
technological, pedagogical, institutional, and intercultural levels. For ELT practitioners, the implications are
clear: multimodal eTwinning projects offer a unique opportunity to prepare future teachers for 21st-century
classrooms, but success requires collaboration, critical reflection, and systematic integration into curricula.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
The findings discussed point to the transformative potential of eTwinning for multimodal pedagogy in ITE,
while also underscoring the need for structured support. This section proposes practical applications for three
main audiences: (1) ELT teacher educators in HE; (2) eTwinning ITE Ambassadors; and (3) institutions and
policymakers. These recommendations aim to translate research insights into actionable strategies that can be
embedded in curricula and professional practice.
For ELT teacher educators
One of the most effective ways to introduce student teachers to multimodal pedagogy is by
embedding eTwinning projects into existing ELT methodology courses, or any other suitable university course
for which a partner can be found. Rather than treating eTwinning as an extracurricular activity, projects can be
aligned with existing learning outcomes such as communicative competence, intercultural awareness, and
digital literacy. For example, in a course on teaching productive skills, students can design digital storytelling
projects with partner institutions, integrating audio narration, visuals, and subtitles. In a language materials
design course, students can create multimodal infographics or interactive quizzes for eTwinning partners. This
approach situates multimodality within the disciplinary core of ELT, ensuring that pre-service teachers
understand its relevance to language pedagogy.
ELT educators should couple multimodal production with critical reflection. Reflective journals, online
discussion forums in which students provide peer feedback, or debriefing sessions can prompt students to
consider how their multimodal choices affect communication and learning. Questions such as ‘How did visuals
help convey meaning to non-native speakers?’ or What challenges did you face in integrating audio and
text?’ foster a critical awareness that extends beyond technical skills.
Assessment can be a barrier when integrating eTwinning into ITE. To address this aspect, teacher educators
should develop assessment rubrics in advance that explicitly include and thus value multimodal competence.
Criteria might include effective integration of multiple modes to achieve communicative goals, real-life
application, clarity and creativity of design, and relevance of multimodal resources to target language learning
objectives. Such rubrics legitimise multimodal outputs as serious academic work, reinforcing their importance
within teacher education.
Page 9735
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
For eTwinning ITE Ambassadors
Ambassadors should prioritise their role as scaffolding mentors, providing technical and pedagogical support
tailored to pre-service teachers. Workshops on accessible multimodal tools (e.g. Canva, Padlet) can empower
students with practical skills. More importantly, Ambassadors should model how to embed these tools into
pedagogical design rather than using them superficially. They are well positioned to cultivate communities of
practice among student teachers, and they can encourage peer exchange of multimodal projects, provide
constructive feedback, and facilitate cross-institutional networking. Such communities allow pre-service
teachers to see themselves as part of a European teaching community, not just as isolated learners in a local
context.
In cross-border projects, Ambassadors can guide students to move beyond surface-level cultural exchange.
Structured reflection prompts, such as comparative analyses of classroom practices or collaborative creation of
bilingual materials, help ensure that multimodality contributes to deeper intercultural learning. Ambassadors
should also address potential challenges, including miscommunication, unequal digital skills or free-rider
students, framing these as opportunities for growth. They should further focus on building partnerships with
European universities, thereby ensuring that their students gain access to diverse multimodal and intercultural
experiences.
For institutions and policymakers
Sustainability requires institutional recognition. Universities should formally integrate eTwinning projects into
course requirements, ensuring that student participation is credit-bearing, which could be a double-edged sword
as some students might be motivated purely by the credits they will receive. Institutional strategies might
include signing agreements with National Support Services to align university programmes with eTwinning
ITE actions, embedding eTwinning into practicum courses so that student teachers connect school placements
with European collaboration, and including eTwinning experience as a criterion in assessment or end-of-the-
course portfolios.
Institutions should provide formal support to Ambassadors or teacher educators, such as reduced teaching
loads, recognition in promotion criteria, or dedicated budgets for workshops and dissemination. Given their
leadership role in fostering multimodal pedagogy, Ambassadors should be recognized as essential to teacher
education innovation.
At the policy level, ministries and agencies can strengthen the integration of multimodal eTwinning projects
into ITE by ensuring that teacher education accreditation standards include competences in digital pedagogy
and intercultural collaboration, and by funding national training events where Ambassadors and teacher
educators share multimodal project practices with universities.
CONCLUSION
The integration of eTwinning into ITE represents a pivotal shift in how European HE prepares pre-service
teachers for the demands of contemporary classrooms. This paper has examined that shift through the lens
of multimodality, showing how digital collaboration on the eTwinning platform fosters new forms of
communication, pedagogy, and professional identity among future ELT practitioners. Central to this process
are eTwinning ITE Ambassadors and teacher educators, who scaffold multimodal practices and act as catalysts
for innovation. eTwinning thus emerges as both a policy-driven initiative for teacher professional development
and a practice-driven framework for multimodal pedagogy in HE.
The discussion has drawn on three interrelated theoretical frameworks multimodality, sociocultural theory,
and ICC to illustrate how eTwinning develops digital, intercultural, and communicative competences.
Importantly, multimodality is not confined to the artefacts that student teachers produce but characterises the
very processes of collaboration, requiring participants to integrate linguistic, visual, auditory, and interactive
resources in ways directly transferable to ELT classrooms.
Page 9736
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
The literature review identified notable gaps. While research has examined eTwinning’s impact on professional
development and ITE integration, systematic analysis of multimodality remains scarce. Likewise, Ambassadors
are acknowledged in policy and practice, but their role in fostering multimodal pedagogy remains under-
theorised. The European research landscape is also uneven, dominated by larger member states while smaller
systems, such as North Macedonia, remain underrepresented. Documenting these contexts is vital for a fuller
understanding of eTwinning in ITE.
For practice, the paper proposed concrete recommendations. Ambassadors and teacher educators should embed
eTwinning projects within ELT methodology courses, employ clear assessment rubrics that recognise
multimodal competences, and integrate reflective practice into project design. Institutions should provide
structural support by embedding eTwinning in curricula, formally recognising Ambassadors, and aligning
national accreditation with EU-level initiatives. These steps affirm that multimodality is a core dimension of
ELT teacher education.
Three priorities for future research emerge: empirical studies of multimodality in eTwinning ITE, including
classroom observation and artefact analysis; evaluation of Ambassador impact through longitudinal studies of
competences and curricula; and comparative analyses across underrepresented contexts, examining how local
conditions shape opportunities and challenges.
Ultimately, this paper argues that multimodality and eTwinning together provide a powerful framework for
reimagining ELT education. Supported by Ambassadors, teacher educators, National Support Services, and
coherent institutional strategies, eTwinning can transform ITE into a space where digital literacy, intercultural
dialogue, and multimodal pedagogy are cultivated simultaneously. By embedding these practices
systematically, HE can prepare pre-service teachers to meet the communicative realities of 21st-century
classrooms and to foster inclusive, innovative learning environments across Europe.
REFERENCES
1. Basantes, M. C. (2025). Adaptation of eTwinning in higher education: Its impact on English teaching:
Adaptación De ETwinning En educación Superior: Su Impacto En La enseñanza Del inglés. LATAM
Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(1), 16951705.
https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i1.3445
2. Belic Malinić, S. (2025). Empowering eTwinning ambassadors: Unveiling teacher leadership
perceptions. In Issues and trends in international school leadership (pp. 415456). IGI Global.
3. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual
Matters.
4. Cannelli, A. (2021). ICT and ELF: From apps to eTwinning. In ELF Pedagogy: A research study on
ELT practices (pp. 103115). Editoriale Anicia Sri. https://iris.unive.it/retrieve/e4239dde-84f5-7180-
e053-3705fe0a3322/page%20proofs_ELF_book1.pdf#page=103
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from
international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291309.
6. Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2016). Becoming little scientists: Technology-enhanced project-based
language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 5478.
7. European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Educators for Better Learning Outcomes.
Publications Office of the European Union. https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-
04/Supporting-Teacher-Educators-for-better-learning-outcomes.pdf
8. European Commission. (2019a). Digital Education at School in Europe: Eurydice Report.
Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-
/publication/d7834ad0-ddac-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
9. European Commission. (2019b). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Publications Office of the
European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-
01aa75ed71a1/language-en
10. European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 20212027: Resetting Education and
Training for the Digital Age. Publications Office of the European Union.
Page 9737
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/plan
11. European Commission. (2021a). The European Education Area: Progress Report 2021. Publications
Office of the European Union. https://education.ec.europa.eu/news/building-the-european-education-
area-progress-report-published
12. European Commission. (2021b). Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Well-being:
Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/teachers_in_europe_2020_chapter_1.pdf
13. European Commission. (2022a). Education and Training Monitor 2022: Comparative Report.
Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-
/publication/cd653a8f-66f4-11ed-b14f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
14. European Commission. (2022b). Progressing toward the European Education Area. Publications
Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1da6d9cd-6703-
11ed-b14f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
15. European Commission. (2023a). Education and Training Monitor 2023: Comparative Report.
Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-
/publication/2d4c4524-8e68-11ee-8aa6-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
16. European Commission. (2023b). The Impact of eTwinning on Initial Teacher Education Placing
Teacher Educators and Student Teachers in the Spotlight: Full Monitoring Report. Publications Office
of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2c9b900c-6e2d-11ee-
9220-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
17. European Commission. (2024). Education and Training Monitor 2024: Comparative Report.
Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-
/publication/9637e78f-acc7-11ef-acb1-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
18. Gilleran, A. (2019). eTwinning in an Era of Change Impact on Teachers’ Practice, Skills, and
Professional Development Opportunities, as Reported by eTwinners. Brussels: Central Support
Service of eTwinning European Schoolnet.
https://etwinning.at/fileadmin/Dokumente/etwinning.at/Sonstiges/eTwinnnig_Summary_Report_2019.
pdf
19. Gülbay, E. (2018). eTwinning collaborative learning environment in initial teacher education.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 5234
5242. https://www.ijarset.com/upload/2018/february/13-IJARSET-Ellifgulbay.pdf
20. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (Eds.). (2015). Developing online language teaching: Research-based
pedagogies and reflective practices. Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2022). The role of eTwinning tools in social and curriculum
integration using multimodal communication. Teaching English with Technology, 22(23), 6384.
22. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2023a). eTwinning and the development of language
teachers’ digital literacy. ENSAYOS: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 38(2), 86101.
23. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2023b). Collaborative international online learning for
the development of intercultural awareness. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(12), 6780.
24. Huertas-Abril, C. A., Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., & Guardeño-Carrasquilla, M. A. (2025). eTwinning
ambassadors’ perceptions about the use of eTwinning to improve EFL skills. rEFLections, 32(1), 356
373.
25. Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
26. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2020). Adding sense: Context and interest in a grammar of multimodal
meaning. Cambridge University Press.
27. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
28. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication.
Routledge.
29. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and
technology. Routledge.
30. Moeller, A. J., & Nugent, K. (2014). Unlock the gateway to communication: Building intercultural
competence in the language classroom. University of Nebraska-Lincoln
31. Napal-Fraile, M., Zudaire, M. I., Pétursdóttir, S., & Pavlin, J. (2024). eTwinning in science learning.
European Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 567582.
Page 9738
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI November 2025 | Special Issue on Education
32. Paz-Albo, J., & López Cirugeda, I. (2017). Higher education perspectives on eTwinning. In
INTED2017 Proceedings (pp. 10731076). IATED Academy.
33. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of
Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 310.
34. The EVALUATE Group. (2019). Evaluating the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher
education. Research-publishing.net. https://research-
publishing.net/book?10.14705/rpnet.2019.29.9782490057337
35. Tosi, A. (Ed.). (2023). Empowering future teachers for a sustainable intercultural and inclusive
education. Carocci editore.
36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard
University Press.