INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9836
www.rsisinternational.org
Prophetic Ethics and Moral Resilience: An Innovative Framework for
Navigating Contemporary Tribulations
Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Al-Haddar, Nur Sakiinah binti Ab Aziz, Kasimah binti Kamaruddin, Tasnim binti
Abdul Rahman, Hussein Ali Abdullah Al-Thulaia
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu (Malaysia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0752
Received: 18 November 2025; Accepted: 26 November 2025; Published: 23 December 2025
ABSTRACT
This study develops an innovative ethical framework for navigating contemporary tribulations by drawing upon
Prophetic traditions. It begins with an exploration of the concept of tribulation (*fitan*) through linguistic,
terminological, Qur’anic, and Prophetic perspectives, situating it within both classical Islamic thought and
modern challenges. The research then examines the role of ethics in shaping moral resilience, stability, and clarity
during times of crisis. Using inductive and analytical methodologies, the study systematically investigates
relevant Prophetic hadiths, the practices of the Companions in confronting tribulations, and insights from
classical and contemporary commentaries. By synthesizing these sources, the paper proposes a forward-looking
ethical paradigm rooted in Prophetic guidance that offers practical principles for managing crises, addressing
social and moral disorientation, and fostering resilience in Muslim societies today. This contribution enriches
the field of Islamic ethics and provides an innovative model for contemporary scholarship on religion, ethics,
and crisis management.
Keywords: Prophetic traditions, Islamic ethics, Tribulations (fitan), Moral resilienc, Crisis management,
Contemporary challenges.
INTRODUCTION
In Islam, Muslims are commanded to uphold good character in all circumstances, as moral integrity is the
foundation of a stable and just society. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) emphasized this when he
said: “And behave with people with good character” (At-Tirmidhi, 1975). The importance of ethical conduct
becomes even more pronounced during times of tribulation (fitan), when confusion spreads, justice is often lost,
and people are vulnerable to injustice and discord. In such times, the Prophetic tradition provides a moral
compass that guides Muslims towards patience, forbearance, fairness, and the avoidance of haste.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) stated: “A Muslim is one from whom other Muslims are safe from his tongue
and hand”(Al-Bukhari, 2001), underscoring the sanctity of life and the necessity of protecting others from harm.
The Qur’an affirms this value: “Whoever kills a soul not in retaliation for another soul or for corruption in the
land—it is as if he had slain mankind entirely” (Qur’an 5:32). Similarly, the Prophet (peace be upon him) warned
against aggression, saying: “Whoever carries weapons against us is not one of us” (Al-Bukhari, 2001). These
teachings highlight Islam’s insistence on safeguarding life, dignity, and security during crises.
Moreover, the Prophetic tradition stresses the ethical use of speech, warning that careless words can become a
source of destruction. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Will anything but the harvests of their tongues
overthrow men in Hell on their faces?” (At-Tirmidhi, 1975). Thus, safeguarding one’s speech is part of the
ethical resilience that preserves society in turbulent times.
By integrating these Prophetic principles into a broader ethical framework, this study seeks to demonstrate how
Islamic ethics can nurture moral resilience and provide practical guidance for navigating contemporary
tribulations.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9837
www.rsisinternational.org
The Linguistic Meaning of Fitnah
The term fitnah (tribulation) is the singular of fitan, derived from the root letters f-t-n, which denote affliction,
testing, or examination. Al-Azharī (2004) stated that the essence of fitnah is affliction and trial, while Ibn Fāris
(1979) explained that the root indicates a process of testing, as in the expression “I tested the gold with fire,”
meaning to examine and distinguish between pure and impure elements. Collectively, the linguistic usage
suggests that fitnah embodies trial, affliction, and divergence of opinions, often leading to confusion, loss of
wisdom, and social or material disruption.
The Conceptual Meaning of Fitnah
Classical scholars extended the meaning of fitnah beyond mere affliction. Az-Zamakhsharī (1986) described it
as tribulation through severe obligations and hardships—such as displacement, poverty, calamities, or the
schemes of adversaries—while Al-Jurjānī (1983) defined it as that which exposes the reality of a person’s
goodness or evil. These perspectives highlight that fitnah not only tests individuals externally but also reveals
their inner moral states.
Fitnah in the Prophetic Tradition
Within the Prophetic tradition, fitnah is presented as a recurring reality of communal life. Ibn Rajab (1996) noted
that general tribulations surge like ocean waves, such as the killing of Caliph ‘Uthmān (may Allah be pleased
with him), which marked the onset of division, conflict, and bloodshed among Muslims. Ibn Hajar (1959)
observed that the term expanded from its original meaning of trial to encompass disbelief, fighting, deviation
from truth, or moral inclinations toward falsehood. From this perspective, fitnah in hadith refers to tribulations
that blur the distinction between truth and falsehood, leading to discord, division, and violence, thereby
threatening both faith and social unity.
The Meaning of Ethics
Ethics (khuluq) in Islamic thought denotes a deep-rooted disposition of the soul that enables actions to be
performed naturally. If this disposition produces actions deemed good by reason and the Sharī‘ah, it is called
good character; if it results in blameworthy actions, it is termed bad character (Al-Jurjānī, 1983).
The Impact and Importance of Ethics in Muslim Life
Ethics were central to the Prophetic mission, as expressed in the hadith: “I was sent to perfect good
character” (Al-Ḥākim, 1990). The Qur’an affirms this by declaring: “And indeed, you are on an excellent
standard of character”(Qur’an 68:4). During tribulations, when confusion, rumors, and falsehood spread
rapidly, the ethical framework becomes crucial. Words can wound like arrows, and unchecked actions can
destabilize communities. Hence, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) emphasized restraint, teaching
that: “A Muslim is one from whose tongue and hands other Muslims are safe” (Al-Bukhārī, 2002). This
Prophetic principle underscores the role of ethics in cultivating moral resilience, enabling Muslims to preserve
unity, safeguard dignity, and maintain clarity in the face of tribulations.
The Prophetic Ethical Approach During Times of Tribulations
The prophetic ethical approach encompasses a set of moral guidelines and practical measures that Muslims are
required to adopt during times of tribulations. These measures serve to preserve faith, unity, and social stability,
while preventing injustice, aggression, and chaos.
First: Treating People as One Wishes to Be Treated
Among the key prophetic directives during tribulations is the instruction: “Let him treat people as he wishes to
be treated” (An-Naysaburi, n.d). This principle establishes the golden rule of ethical interactionplacing
oneself in the position of others and applying justice, empathy, and fairness in all dealings. Al-Lasheen (2002)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9838
www.rsisinternational.org
explained that the path to salvation in times of turmoil lies in holding firmly to faith and moral virtues, and in
treating people as one would wish to be treated.
In this hadith, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) refers to the intensification of tribulations in the end
times, where each tribulation appears overwhelming until it passes, only to be followed by another. His guidance
directs Muslims to uphold faith, virtuous conduct, and mutual compassion as a safeguard against moral collapse.
Al-Sa‘di (2002) elaborates: “Kindness to people involves giving them, from your speech, actions, wealth, and
dealings, what you wish for yourself. This is the true measure of kindness and advice. If you love something, you
should love it for others as you love it for yourself.” Thus, prophetic ethics in times of trial emphasize empathy,
justice, and self-restraint as the foundation for social harmony.
Contemporary Relevance: This principle is a critical countermeasure to the dehumanization and polarization
often seen in modern conflicts and online discourse. It demands that we extend courtesy and justice, even to
opponents, fostering a basis for reconciliation instead of perpetual enmity.
Second: Adhering to the Imam and Avoiding Division.
A central prophetic instruction during tribulations is to remain united under the legitimate leader (imam) and
avoid any form of rebellion or division. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “Whoever pledges
allegiance to an imam, giving him the pledge of his hand and the loyalty of his heart, let him obey him if he can.
If another comes to dispute with him, strike the neck of the latter” (An-Naysaburi, n.d). This narration
underscores the impermissibility of rebelling against the legitimate leader and highlights the necessity of
resisting anyone who seeks to undermine unity. An-Nawawi (1972) explains that if repelling such opposition
requires armed resistance, it becomes obligatory; and if it results in the death of the transgressor, then such a
killing does not require reparation, as he is deemed an aggressor.
Similarly, in the hadith of ʿArfajah, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “Whoever comes to you
while your affairs are united under one leader and seeks to split your unity or divide your group, kill him” (An-
Naysaburi, n.d). Furthermore, Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman reported that the Prophet said: “Adhere to the group of
Muslims and their imam.”When Hudhayfah asked what to do if no imam or unified group existed, the Prophet
replied: “Then avoid all those factions, even if you have to bite the root of a tree until death finds you in that
state” (Al-Bukhari, 2001).
These narrations demonstrate the prophetic emphasis on safeguarding communal unity and resisting division,
except in cases where obedience to a leader entails disobedience to Allah. As Al-Mashhur (2005, 2010) explains,
the correct approach during such times is to align with the imam in fostering peace and stability while avoiding
entanglement in political conflicts that exacerbate tribulations.
Contemporary Relevance: This principle directly addresses the destructive nature of sectarian violence and
civil unrest. It provides a religious justification for prioritizing national stability and legitimate
governance over factionalism, especially where the consequence of rebellion is mass bloodshed and chaos.
Third: Forbearance (al-ilm).
Forbearance is a cardinal virtue that Muslims are urged to embody, particularly during times of tribulations when
emotions often run high and rash decisions can lead to greater harm. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon
him) said:
“The Last Hour would come when the Romans would form a majority of people. Indeed, among them are four
qualities: They are the most forbearing in times of tribulations, the quickest to recover after a calamity, the most
likely to return after fleeing, and the best to the poor, orphans, and the weak. The fifth is a good, beautiful trait:
They are the most restrained from oppressing kings” (An-Naysaburi, n.d).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9839
www.rsisinternational.org
This hadith highlights the value of forbearance in times of instability and presents it as a quality that sustains
individuals and communities amidst turmoil. Forbearance entails the control of anger, restraint from vengeance,
and maintaining composure in the face of provocation (Various Specialists, n.d). It is not only a human virtue
but also a divine attribute, as Allah is described in the Qur’an: “And Allah is Rich and Forbearing” (Surah Al-
Baqarah: 263). Likewise, it is a trait of the prophets, as Allah says about Ibrahim: “Indeed, Ibrahim was
forbearing, tender-hearted” (Surah At-Tawbah: 114).
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) commended Ashajj of the tribe of ʿAbd al-Qais, saying: “You
have two qualities that Allah loves: forbearance and deliberation” (An-Naysaburi, n.d). This indicates that
forbearance is not merely passive endurance, but an active moral discipline that grants clarity and wisdom,
enabling individuals to perceive realities accurately. In the midst of tribulations, such clarity is vital, as holding
firmly to faith becomes as difficult as grasping burning coals. Thus, the prophetic tradition encourages Muslims
to embrace forbearance, patience, and perseverance, preserving their faith while contributing to communal
harmony (Al-Mashhur, 2015).
Contemporary Relevance: Forbearance is the antidote to the "cancel culture" and instantaneous
outrage prevalent in the digital age. It compels individuals to pause, verify, and respond thoughtfully rather than
react impulsively, thereby lowering the temperature of heated public debates and preventing unnecessary
conflict.
Fourth: Protecting the Sanctity of Muslim Life
In his Farewell Sermon, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) declared: “Indeed, your blood and your
wealth are sacred to you, as sacred as this day of yours in this month of yours” (An-Naysaburi, n.d.). This
profound statement establishes the inviolability of Muslim life as a foundational principle in Islamic ethics and
law. Al-Hasan reported:
“I went out with my weapon during the nights of the tribulations. Abu Bakrah met me and asked, ‘Where are
you going?’ I said, ‘I am seeking to support the cousin of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him).’ He said,
‘The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: If two Muslims face each other with their swords, both of
them are people of the Fire.’ It was asked, ‘And what about the one who is killed?’ He replied, ‘He intended to
kill his companion’ (Al-Bukhari, 2001).
This narration highlights the severity of bloodshed among Muslims: both the aggressor and the victim share
accountability due to their intention to kill. For this reason, the Companions of the Prophet deliberately distanced
themselves from internal strife, recognizing the destructive consequences of such tribulations. Their approach
reflects a deep awareness of the ethical imperatives in Islam, prioritizing peace, restraint, and self-preservation
over partisanship.
When asked about the way to safety, the Prophet (peace be upon him) replied: “Control your tongue, confine
yourself to your home, and weep over your sins” (At-Tirmidhi, 1975). Scholars such as Al-Barbahari emphasized
that during periods of civil strife, one must avoid factionalism and refrain from endorsing any side,
since “whoever loves the actions of a people—whether good or bad—is like one who has done them” (Al-
Barbahari, 1997). Contemporary scholars echo this stance, arguing that understanding socio-political
transformations during crises helps Muslims avoid bloodshed and provides a religiously sound framework for
self-protection (Al-Mashhoor, 2005).
The Prophet also advised: “If you encounter these tribulations, go to Mount Uhud, break the edge of your sword
with it, and then sit in your house. If anyone enters your house, go to the inner chamber. If they enter the inner
chamber, kneel and say: ‘Here I am with my sin and your sin,’ and you will be among the people of the Fire.
That is the recompense for the wrongdoers” (Ibn Hanbal, 2001). Such guidance underscores the necessity of de-
escalation and the rejection of violence, even at the cost of personal vulnerability.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9840
www.rsisinternational.org
This prophetic wisdom has contemporary relevance in today’s conflicts, where civil wars, sectarian violence,
and political instability devastate Muslim societies. Arms tradingoften fueled by external actorsexacerbates
these crises, as weapons flow indiscriminately into Muslim lands, prolonging conflict and weakening unity.
Modern scholars (As-Salqini, 2012) stress that prohibiting the sale of arms during tribulations remains a vital
application of prophetic guidance to prevent exploitation by profiteers and adversaries. By adhering to the
Prophetic model, Muslims can counter the destructive cycle of violence, protect communities, and preserve the
sanctity of life.
Contemporary Relevance: This principle is a direct ethical response to the crises of civil wars and sectarian
violencethat plague many Muslim societies today. It mandates that Muslims refrain from factionalism and
prohibits activities like arms trading during internal conflicts (As-Salqini, 2012), actively working to counter the
cycle of violence and exploitation.
Fifth: Avoiding People and Steering Clear of Places of Tribulations
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) repeatedly emphasized withdrawal from tribulations as a means
of spiritual and physical safety. Abu Musa reported that the Prophet said: “Break your bows, cut your strings,
stay in the interior of your homes, and be like the son of Adam” (At-Tirmidhi, 1975). This instruction illustrates
the importance of detachment from violent conflict. Commentators such as As-Sindi argued that “patience in
death during such times is better than movement, as movement increases the fitnah” (As-Sindi, 1725), while Al-
Qari stressed that disengagement becomes obligatory in periods of widespread and indiscriminate turmoil (Al-
Qari, 2002).
Similarly, Ibn Mas‘ud narrated that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “All the slain in those tribulations are
in the Fire.” When asked about the proper response during such times, the Prophet replied: “Keep your tongue
and hand from harm and be like a mat in your house” (As-Sijistani, 2009). The metaphor of being like a “mat”
underscores complete neutrality, passivity, and withdrawal from escalating hostilities.
In the contemporary context, this guidance carries significant weight. In times of political polarization, sectarian
conflict, or civil unrest, aligning with factions often results in the loss of life, trust, and communal harmony.
Modern scholars argue that detachment is not a sign of weakness but rather a moral stance that prevents
individuals from being complicit in bloodshed and societal collapse (Al-Mashhur, 2015). In practical terms,
Muslims are encouraged to prioritize self-preservation, focus on their families, safeguard their faith, and avoid
falling into the cycle of retaliatory violence that often consumes communities in times of fitnah.
Contemporary Relevance: In times of intense political polarization, civil unrest, or sectarian conflict, this
advice urges Muslims to prioritize self-preservation, family security, and safeguarding their faith over
aligning with factions. Detachment is presented not as weakness, but as a moral position that prevents complicity
in societal collapse (Al-Mashhur, 2015).
Sixth: Restraining the Tongue in Times of Tribulations
The tongue, though small, can cause destruction greater than weapons. During periods of unrest, rumours,
inflammatory rhetoric, and misinformation can escalate violence faster than physical weapons. Ibn Mas‘ud
advised: “Control your tongue and your hand” (As-Sijistani, 2009). Similarly, the Prophet (peace be upon him)
warned: “Beware of tribulations, for the tongue in them is like the impact of a sword” (Ibn Majah, n.d.).
This prophetic teaching is remarkably relevant in the digital age. With the rise of social media, the spread of
rumours and fake news during political crises has amplified divisions and fueled conflicts across the Muslim
world. Wordswhether spoken in public forums or shared onlinehave the potential to incite violence,
delegitimize leaders, or destabilize communities. Hence, the Prophetic command to “restrain the
tongue” extends beyond speech to include responsible use of digital communication.
Al-Mashhur (2015) observed that the path of safety lies in “guarding the tongue from blame and the hand from
bloodshed.” This position mirrors the conduct of the Prophet’s Companions, who often chose silence and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9841
www.rsisinternational.org
withdrawal over reckless speech during turbulent times. The ethical principle is clear: Muslims must verify
information, avoid spreading unconfirmed reports, refrain from inflammatory rhetoric, and instead adopt
language that fosters reconciliation and peace.
In essence, controlling the tongue is not only a personal virtue but also a societal safeguard. It protects individuals
from sin and shields communities from chaos. In today’s interconnected world, where a single statement can
reach millions within seconds, this Prophetic wisdom offers a timeless strategy for conflict prevention and the
preservation of unity.
Contemporary Relevance: This principle is profoundly relevant to the digital age, where social media allows
the instantaneous spread of fake news, hyper-partisan rhetoric, and incitement that fuel divisions. The
command to “restrain the tongue” extends to the responsible use of digital communication. Muslims are
ethically bound to verify information, avoid spreading unconfirmed reports, and use language that
fosters reconciliation and peace. Guarding the tongue is both a personal virtue and a societal safeguard.
Seventh: Taking What is Known and Leaving What is Denied
One of the most insightful Prophetic instructions concerning tribulations is found in the narration of Abdullah
ibn Amr ibn Al-‘As. He reported that the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) mentioned tribulations and
said: “When you see people break their promises, their trustworthiness becomes light, and they become like
this”and he interlaced his fingers. Abdullah ibn Amr asked: “What should I do in such a situation, may Allah
make me your ransom?” The Prophet replied: Stay in your house, control your tongue, take what you know to
be true, and leave what you find reprehensible. Focus on your own private affairs and leave the public affairs
aside” (As-Sijistani, 2009).
This hadith outlines a clear framework for Muslims in times of turmoil and societal disorder. The Prophet (peace
be upon him) emphasized four essential principles:
1. Staying at home physical withdrawal from conflict zones to avoid harm.
2. Controlling the tongue refraining from contributing to rumours, disputes, or provocative speech.
3. Holding fast to what is known to be true clinging to religiously verified truths and established moral
values.
4. Avoiding what is reprehensible distancing oneself from doubtful or corrupt practices.
Al- Azim Abadi (1994) noted that this guidance provides a temporary concession to avoid enjoining good and
forbidding evil when corruption prevails, the righteous become weak, and the wicked dominate. In such contexts,
attempting to correct the public may expose individuals to greater harm and deepen the fitnah rather than resolve
it. Thus, self-preservation and focusing on one’s private matters become an act of wisdom, not negligence.
The phrase “Take what you know and leave what you deny” is particularly profound. It instructs Muslims to
prioritize certainty over doubt, aligning with the broader Islamic principle: “Leave that which makes you doubt
for that which does not make you doubt” (Al-Tirmidhi). A Muslim should cling to what is clearly permitted and
beneficial for their faith and well-being while avoiding what contradicts the Sharī‘ah. Al-Eid (n.d.) emphasized
that when a believer witnesses widespread sins, they should thank Allah for protecting them and distance
themselves from participating in or normalizing such wrongdoing.
From a contemporary perspective, this hadith offers timeless wisdom for dealing with the confusion of modern
tribulationswhether political instability, sectarian strife, or the overwhelming influence of misinformation. In
an era where public discourse is often dominated by polarized narratives, the Prophetic instruction to focus on
verified truths, personal piety, and restraint provides a safeguard against being consumed by collective chaos.
Ultimately, this teaching is not a call to disengagement from society altogether, but rather a reminder that in
times of moral inversion and social collapse, safeguarding one’s faith, family, and private affairs may constitute
the highest form of religious commitment and ethical responsibility.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9842
www.rsisinternational.org
Contemporary Relevance: This teaching offers a timeless strategy for navigating the confusion of modern
informational and political instability. It instructs Muslims to reject polarized narratives, focus on verified
ethical and religious truths, and make their family and private piety the immediate prioritya spiritual anchor
in times of moral inversion and collective chaos.
CONCLUSION
Studying the topic of tribulations and the means of safety from them is a crucial subject in the life of the Muslim
community, especially in the contemporary era. Tribulations are an exceptional phase that requires finding a safe
way out. An objective and conscious study of the Prophetic hadiths provides us with the appropriate remedy for
these dangerous stages. Additionally, the issue of tribulations requires significant attention from scholars and
researchers to find the right solutions to safely navigate these dangers. The rise in claims by various sects, groups,
and parties asserting that they alone possess the truth and the correct path to safety has led to mutual accusations
and labelling others as misguided. This can even escalate to the point of declaring others as disbelievers, resulting
in the justification of violence against them, ultimately leading to the shedding of blood. Thus, the importance
of adhering to ethical conduct during times of tribulations becomes clear, as well as the need to avoid conflict
and disputes, which often result in the violation of lives and dignity.
REFERENCES
1. Ibn Hajar, Ahmad bin Ali. (1959). Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari. Edited by Muhibb al-Din al-
Khatib. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah.
2. Ibn Rajab, Abdul Rahman bin Ahmad. (1996). Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari. Edited by a group of
scholars. Al-Madina Al-Nabawiyya: Maktabat al-Ghurabaa al-Athariyyah.
3. Ibn Faris, Ahmad. (1979). Maqayis al-Lugha. Edited by Abd al-Salam Muhammad Harun. Dar al-Fikr.
4. Al-Azhari, Muhammad bin Ahmad. (2004). Tahdhib al-Lugha. Edited by Muhammad Awad. Beirut: Dar
Ihya al-Turath.
5. Al-Sa'di, Abdul Rahman. (2002). Bahjat Qulub al-Abrar wa Qurrat Uyoun al-Akhyar fi Sharh Jawami'
al-Akhbar. Edited by Abdul Karim bin Rasmi Al-Darini. Maktabat al-Rushd lil-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'.
6. Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Isma'il. (2001). Al-Jami' al-Musnad al-Sahih al-Mukhtasar min Umur Rasul
Allah wa Sunanihi wa Ayyamihi . Edited by Muhammad Zuhayr bin Nasir al-Nasir. Dar Tawq al-
Najah.
7. Al-Barbahari, Abu Muhammad al-Hasan bin Ali bin Khalaf. (1997). Sharh al-Sunnah.
8. At-Tirmidhi, Muhammad bin Isa. (1975). Sunan al-Tirmidhi Egypt: Sharikat wa Matba'at al-Babi al-
Halabi.
9. Al-Jurjani, Ali bin Muhammad. (1983). Al-Ta’rifat. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
10. Al-Hazmi, Hussein bin Mohsen. (2000). Mawqif al-Muslim min al-Fitn fi Daw' al-Kitab wa al-Sunnah
Riyadh: Adwa al-Salaf.
11. Al-Hakim, Abu Abdullah Muhammad. (1990). Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn . Edited by Mustafa Abdul
Qadir Ata. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
12. Az-Zamakhshari, Mahmoud bin Umar. (n.d). Al-Fa’iq fi Gharib al-Hadith wa al-Athar. Beirut: Dar al-
Ma'rifah.
13. Az-Zamakhshari, Mahmoud bin Umar. (1407 AH). Al-Kashshaf . Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi.
14. As-Sijistani, Abu Dawood. (2009). Sunan Abi Dawood. Dar al-Risala al-Alamiyah.
15. Salqini, Ibrahim. (2012). Qital al-Fitna Bayn al-Muslimin. Damascus: Dar al-Nawadir.
16. As-Sindi, Muhammad. Hashiyat al-Sindi ala Sunan Ibn Majah. Beirut: Dar al-Jil.
17. At-Tibi, Sharaf al-Din. (1997). Sharh al-Tibi ala Mishkat al-Masabih al-Musamma bi (al-Kashif an
Haqaiq al-Sunan) . Edited by Abdul Majid Hindawi. Riyadh: Maktabat Mustafa Nizar al-Baz.
18. Various specialists. (n.d) Nadhrat al-Na'im (4th ed.). Jeddah: Dar al-Wasilah lil-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'.
19. Al-Azeem Abadi, Muhammad Ashraf. (1994). Sharh Sunan Abi Dawood. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-
Ilmiyyah.
20. Al-Eid, Nawal bint Abdul Aziz. (n,d). Mawqif al-Mu’min min al-Fitn fi Daw' Hadith Abdullah bin Amr.
21. Al-Qari, Ali bin Sultan. (2002). Mirqat al-Mafatih Sharh Mishkat al-Masabih . Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS |Volume IX Issue XXVI October 2025 | Special Issue on Education
Page 9843
www.rsisinternational.org
22. Al-Qazwini, Ibn Majah.(n,d). Sunan Ibn Majah. Edited by Muhammad Fuad Abdul Baqi. Dar Ihya al-
Kutub al-Arabiyyah wa Faisal al-Halabi.
23. Al-Mashhur, Abu Bakr. (2010). Manhaj al-Salama al-Wa’i .Yemen: Markaz al-Ibda' al-Thaqafi lil-
Dirasat.
24. Al-Mashhur, Abu Bakr. (2005). Al-Usus wa al-Muntalaqat . Dar al-Mu'in lil-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'.
25. Al-Mashhur, Abu Bakr. (2015). Al-Nubdha As-Sughra . Dar al-Mu'in lil-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'.
26. An-Nawawi, Yahya bin Sharaf. (1972). Al-Minhaj Sharh Sahih Muslim . Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-
Arabi.
27. An-Naysaburi, Muslim bin al-Hajjaj.(n,d). Sahih Muslim. Edited by Muhammad Fuad Abdul Baqi.
Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.
28. Al-Walid, Mahmoud Rajab. (2002). Kashf al-Minan fi Alamat al-Saa wa al-Malahim wa al-Fitn . Egypt:
Maktabat Ibad al-Rahman, and Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.