Teaching Strategies in Flexible Learning: The Political Science  
Department Experience  
Aileen B. Sarte  
Bicol University College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Philippines  
Received: 29 August 2025; Accepted: 05 September 2025; Published: 30 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
This study examines the experiences of Political Science students with the teaching strategies employed by  
their teachers in the context of flexible learning. This learning modality was practiced during the pandemic  
when classes were conducted synchronously and asynchronously. It covered three main objectives: (1) to  
ascertain the level of effectiveness of the teaching strategies in flexible learning used by the Political Science  
faculty members in their professional courses as perceived by the students; (2) to identify the factors  
contributing to the level of effectiveness of the teaching strategies as perceived by the students; and (3) to  
determine the challenges the students encountered in relation to the teaching strategies employed by their  
subject teachers for flexible learning. This study used the mixed-method approach. A structured questionnaire  
was developed to collect the necessary data and was distributed to 153 respondents. For the analysis of the  
answers obtained from the interview of 12 students, thematic analysis was used to determine the challenges  
and factors affecting the effectiveness of the teaching strategies. The findings revealed that the most effective  
strategy was the use of visuals, including PowerPoint presentations, as it stimulates the imagination and helps  
students develop visual thinking skills. Other learning strategies were considered only effective because they  
do not warrant a conducive learning environment suited for synchronous and asynchronous classes. The  
factors that contributed to the effectiveness of these strategies included the creation of school policies to  
accommodate flexible learning modalities, managing learner behavior to provide productive learning  
opportunities, presenting appropriate content, and engaging teachers in targeted behavioral interventions. The  
most frequently observed challenges in the conduct of flexible learning include engagement issues such as  
reporting without proper feedback, the overwhelming volume of activities, and irregular attendance by  
teachers.  
Keywords: teaching strategies, flexible learning, Political Science department, experience  
INTRODUCTION  
During the pandemic, people’s lives were completely upended due to the drastic and abrupt changes in social  
norms and lifestyles, given the stringent preventive measures imposed in the community. The restrictions on  
the mobility of people brought about by the deadly COVID-19 virus impacted various human endeavors,  
including running essential errands, outdoor recreational activities, livelihoods, and business undertakings.  
Moreover, a great deal of challenges have been faced by private offices and government agencies since the  
mandatory community quarantine was implemented. Hence, schools and universities were never exempt from  
this situation.  
Consequently, CHED Chairman Prospero de Vera III stated that HEIs are ready by August 2020, though the  
battle with the coronavirus is still ongoing. He said that high-performing universities have adopted flexible  
learning before COVID, so this kind of learning modality is not new at all. Other universities, on the other  
hand, are also preparing before the opening of classes that involve the use of digital and non-digital  
technology, where the Internet is not required at all (Magsambol, 2020). On September 2, 2020, CHED issued  
Memorandum No. 4, Series of 2020, declaring the adoption and promulgation of flexible learning to be  
Page 9907  
implemented in the private and public HEIs. Given the students a mandate to study at home, schools tend to  
improvise to serve their clientele without sacrificing the quality of education their students deserve.  
There has been a considerable amount of time for online classes to be adopted in schools to determine if  
quality education has been delivered to some extent among our students. However, pragmatically speaking, we  
cannot deny the fact that certain factors hinder learning outcomes. Learning options were then provided to  
cater to the various needs of the students. For example, synchronous modality is used when the internet  
connection is stable, and asynchronous modality is used when the situation is deemed otherwise. However,  
there are other reasons why asynchronous learning is sometimes adopted; it may be due to school activities  
that require teachers to be on-site, or student activities that allow them to be excused from attending online  
classes. The rest could be attributed to poor internet connection, power interruptions, natural calamities, and  
many other unforeseen circumstances.  
Given these premises, this study aimed to determine whether the teaching methods employed by professors in  
the Political Science department had a positive impact on their students' learning. This way, professors could  
practice the best teaching strategies for flexible learning. Students’ personal experiences in flexible learning  
will help validate the teaching strategies, as they would explain why some of these strategies have failed while  
others are deemed highly effective. The findings of this study will benefit academics, both local and  
international, by recommending effective teaching strategies that can be replicated in their respective fields of  
work, while inspiring future researchers to explore other factors for potential research.  
Conceptual/Theoretical Framework  
This study employed the educational theory of Constructivism, in line with the teaching strategies, and  
Behaviorism, a psychological theory, to explain the students' behavior in response to the approach applied to  
them.  
The theory of constructivism, as proposed by Piaget, states that one’s experiences are how knowledge is  
created and forms its meaning. (Teachnology, n.d.) In a constructivist view, learning happens through active  
collaboration and interaction among students and teachers. Learning occurs through an inductive process,  
where teachers initiate the exploration of ideas in an active and learner-centered environment. (ASU, 2021)  
Since our educational system focuses on the outcomes of our students' learning, the idea of constructivism as a  
theoretical framework best aligns with the concept of student-centered instruction. Although teachers employ  
flexible teaching strategies, the design of their lessons allows students to work at their own pace, enabling  
them to explore different resources and exercise their critical thinking in the process. Students are in constant  
communication with their teachers through various convenient online or electronic means, implying that  
teachers serve as guides who facilitate their students' learning.  
Behaviorism, as presented by John Watson, focuses on the learning process through observable behavior  
(ASU, 2021). The stimulus-response model is a clear manifestation that all behaviors are products of events  
and situations in the environment. (First Discoverers, 2021)  
Students’ attainment of the course learning outcomes is what teachers are more concerned about. The teaching  
strategy employs various assessments to monitor the student’s progress. According to Skidmore College  
(2021), teachers employ both direct and indirect methods of assessment to evaluate students’ learning abilities,  
knowledge, and values. Some of these methods include the use of portfolios, assessments, exam surveys,  
interviews, and focus groups.  
Applying Watson's idea, student behavior, as manifested in online learning, including assessments used by  
teachers, will determine whether the strategy is effective or properly delivered to the students. This study,  
therefore, will investigate students' experiences through interviews and surveys to assess the behavior  
manifested by students in response to the strategies used by teachers. It will recommend which of these  
strategies should be adopted and which require further enrichment.  
Page 9908  
Materials and Methods  
This study used the mixed-method approach. Each objective has a corresponding methodology to ensure the  
correctness of the data needed. A structured questionnaire was made to identify teaching strategies employed  
in flexible learning and assess their effectiveness as perceived by respondents. Also included is a list of factors  
that determine the effectiveness of the teaching strategies. Following an in-depth discussion of the challenges  
experienced and other concerns raised by the students' survey answers, an interview was conducted. For the  
analysis of the answers obtained during the interview, the qualitative aspect of the study, thematic analysis,  
was employed to generate data on the challenges experienced and, at some point, on the factors affecting the  
effectiveness of the teaching strategies.  
The respondents of the study are political science students who were enrolled in the program during the  
pandemic, when classes were held online. A sample population was identified per year level from the second  
to the fourth year. The stratified sample size was calculated using the formula: stratified sample size = (sample  
size/population size) × stratum size. Out of the total population of 253, the sample size is 153, with a  
distribution of 48 (2nd year), 46 (3rd year), and 59 (4th year), respectively. For the interview, 12 students were  
purposively selected as key informants from each year level to ensure equal representation. Data gathering was  
conducted during the second semester of the 2023-2024 school year.  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
The primary objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the teaching strategies in flexible learning as  
perceived by Political Science students (n = 153) at the Bicol University College of Social Sciences and  
Philosophy. Tables 1 and 2 present the commonly used teaching strategies, along with their level of  
effectiveness. Table 3, on the other hand, illustrates the various factors contributing to the perceived  
effectiveness of the teaching strategies used in flexible learning. Lastly, Table 5 outlines the challenges  
encountered by students regarding the teaching strategies employed by their course instructors in flexible  
learning.  
Level of Effectiveness of the Teaching Strategies in Flexible Learning  
This section provides for the identification of teaching strategies used by the course instructors in flexible  
learning, as identified by the students. Table 1 below presents a summary of the respondents’ answers.  
Table 1. Teaching Strategies Utilized in Flexible Learning as Perceived by the Students  
Teaching Strategies  
Frequency  
137  
Percentage  
89.5%  
Visual presentations (i.e., use of PowerPoint presentations)  
Student-centered inquiry (i.e., research, reflection papers, journals, etc.)  
Cooperative Learning (i.e., collaborative work on a given task)  
133  
86.9%  
121  
79.1%  
Differentiated Instruction (i.e., use of different assessment tools suited to 83  
individual needs)  
54.2%  
The survey results revealed a varied range of teaching strategies employed by course instructors in the flexible  
learning environment for AB Political Science students. The most frequently utilized strategy was Visual  
presentations, like the use of PowerPoint presentations, which was reported by 137 students, accounting for  
89.5% of the total respondents. This high percentage indicates a strong reliance on visual materials to enhance  
understanding and engagement in the learning process.  
Following closely, the Student-centered inquiry approach, which encompasses activities such as research,  
reflection papers, and journals, was identified by 133 students, or 86.9% of the participants. This strategy  
Page 9909  
emphasizes active learning and critical thinking, encouraging students to explore and reflect on their own  
learning experiences. Cooperative Learning, involving collaborative work, was reported by 121 students,  
making up 79.1% of the responses. This strategy facilitates peer interaction and teamwork, which are essential  
skills in both academic and professional settings.  
Differentiated Instruction, which includes varied assessment tools tailored to individual student needs, was  
utilized by 83 students, or 54.2% of the respondents. This approach highlights the instructors' efforts to address  
diverse learning styles and capabilities, ensuring that all students have the opportunity to succeed.  
The results indicate a strong preference for traditional and research-based teaching strategies, with a particular  
emphasis on visuals and student-centered inquiry. Visual presentations, which often incorporate diagrams,  
charts, and videos, are highly valued for their ability to make abstract and complex concepts more tangible and  
understandable. This approach caters to visual learners and enhances retention by providing concrete  
representations of information. The effectiveness of visuals in a flexible learning environment underscores its  
role in maintaining student engagement and facilitating deeper comprehension. Similarly, student-centered  
inquiry, which includes research projects, reflection papers, and journaling, empowers students to take an  
active role in their education. This strategy promotes critical thinking, self-reflection, and independent  
problem-solving essential skills in higher education and beyond. By encouraging students to explore and  
investigate topics independently, instructors can foster a sense of curiosity and intrinsic motivation, resulting in  
more meaningful and lasting learning experiences.  
However, the data also reveals that instructors employ different approaches to cater to diverse learning needs  
and preferences, demonstrating their adaptability in the flexible learning environment. As Lundin (2012)  
stated, this adaptability is crucial in addressing the varied backgrounds, learning styles, and access levels of  
students. For example, differentiated instruction involves tailoring teaching methods and assessment tools to  
meet the individual needs of students, recognizing that learners progress at different rates and have unique  
strengths and weaknesses. By using diverse instructional strategies, such as differentiated assignments, flexible  
grouping, and personalized feedback, instructors can provide more equitable and inclusive learning  
opportunities. The mixed effectiveness ratings for differentiated instruction suggest that while it holds great  
potential, its implementation can be complex and requires continuous refinement.  
Additionally, online interactive educational games represent another innovative approach, albeit with varied  
results. These games can make learning more engaging and enjoyable, particularly for students who thrive in  
interactive and gamified environments. However, their effectiveness depends on factors such as game design,  
curriculum relevance, and students' technological proficiency. The positive reception of cooperative learning,  
where students collaborate in small groups, further highlights the instructors' flexibility. This strategy not only  
supports academic education but also helps students develop essential interpersonal skills, such as  
communication and teamwork. By incorporating group projects and collaborative activities, instructors create a  
dynamic and interactive learning environment that caters to social learners, enhancing the overall educational  
experience.  
Table 1.1 Level of Effectiveness of Teaching Strategies Utilized in Flexible Learning as Perceived by the  
Students  
Teaching Strategies  
Not Effective  
Effective  
Very Effective  
Weighted  
Mean  
Verbal  
Interpretation  
F
P
F
P
F
P
Visual presentations (use of 4  
PowerPoint presentations)  
2.6%  
79  
51.6% 70  
45.8% 2.4  
Very  
Effective  
Student-centered  
inquiry  
(research, reflection papers,  
journals, etc.)  
8
5.2%  
95  
62.1% 50  
32.7% 2.3  
Effective  
Page 9910  
Cooperative  
Learning  
(Collaborative Work on a  
given task)  
17  
16  
11.1% 88  
10.5% 82  
57.5% 48  
53.6% 55  
31.4% 2.2  
Effective  
Effective  
Differentiated  
Instruction  
35.9%  
2.3  
(use of different assessment  
tools suited to individual  
needs  
Total  
2.3  
Effective  
The data in Table 2 presents the level of effectiveness of various teaching strategies utilized in flexible  
learning as perceived by the students and offers insightful observations into the effectiveness of different  
instructional methods.  
Visual presentations (use of PowerPoint presentations) emerged as a highly effective strategy, with a weighted  
mean of 2.4 interpreted as very effective. This high level of perceived effectiveness underscores the  
importance of visual and auditory enhancements in facilitating comprehension and engagement in a flexible  
learning environment.  
Student-centered inquiry, which encompasses research, reflective papers, and journals, was also well-received  
by a substantial number of students. Respondents rated this strategy as effective with a weighted mean of 2.3,  
which further reinforces the value of active learning and self-reflection in promoting deeper understanding and  
critical thinking.  
Cooperative Learning, involving collaborative work, was rated as effective with a weighted mean of 2.2,  
indicating that while collaborative efforts are generally beneficial, they may not be universally effective for all  
students. On the other hand, Differentiated Instruction, which utilizes varied assessment tools suited to  
individual needs, received positive feedback from students, with a 2.3 weighted mean, indicating its  
effectiveness; nonetheless, its implementation may need further refinement to address all students' needs and  
enhance its effectiveness.  
Overall, the data suggest that traditional and research-based strategies, such as visual presentations and  
student-centered inquiry, are highly valued and effective in flexible learning environments (Crossland &  
Reudel, 2021). Visual presentations, which include the use of PowerPoint, help make abstract concepts more  
tangible and easier to understand, thereby enhancing student engagement and information retention. The high  
effectiveness ratings for student-centered inquiry, which encompasses activities such as research, reflection  
papers, and journals, indicate that these methods foster critical thinking, self-directed learning, and deeper  
comprehension. These strategies align well with the principles of active learning, where students are  
encouraged to take an active role in their education process, leading to more meaningful and lasting learning  
outcomes.  
However, there is variability in the effectiveness of differentiated instruction and online interactive games,  
indicating a need for ongoing evaluation and adaptation of these methods to better meet diverse student needs.  
Differentiated instruction, which involves tailoring teaching methods and assessment tools to individual  
student needs, shows promise but also reveals challenges in consistent implementation. The mixed feedback  
suggests that while differentiation can address diverse learning styles and abilities, it requires careful planning,  
adequate resources, and continuous professional development for teachers to be effective. Similarly, online  
interactive games, though engaging for some students, may not universally appeal to all learners. The  
effectiveness of these games can depend on factors such as game design, the relevance of content, and the  
student's familiarity with the technology. Therefore, it is essential to continuously assess and refine these  
strategies to ensure they effectively contribute to student learning.  
The positive reception of cooperative learning also emphasizes the importance of peer interaction and  
collaborative efforts in enhancing the learning experience (Mahmood, 2020). Cooperative learning strategies,  
Page 9911  
which involve students working together in small groups to achieve common goals, promote the development  
of essential skills such as teamwork, communication, and problem-solving. The high effectiveness ratings for  
this strategy suggest that students benefit from the social aspects of learning, where they can share ideas,  
provide mutual support, and learn from each other. This collaborative approach not only helps in the academic  
context but also prepares students for real-world scenarios where teamwork and cooperation are crucial.  
The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach in flexible learning environments, where traditional,  
research-based strategies are complemented by innovative methods tailored to diverse student needs.  
Educators need to remain adaptable and responsive to feedback, continuously evaluating and refining their  
teaching strategies. Professional development opportunities that focus on the effective implementation of  
differentiated instruction and the integration of technology in teaching can further enhance the quality of  
flexible learning.  
In conclusion, while strategies such as visual presentations, student-centered inquiry, cooperative learning, and  
differentiated instruction remain effective, there is a clear indication that flexible learning environments  
require a diverse array of teaching methods. The variability in the effectiveness of these strategies underscores  
the importance of ongoing assessment and adaptation. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and  
embracing a variety of instructional approaches, educators can better meet the diverse needs of their students,  
ultimately leading to a highly effective and engaging learning experience.  
Factors Contributing to the Level of Effectiveness of the Teaching Strategies in Flexible Learning  
The effectiveness of teaching strategies is determined by factors favored by the students, as indicated in Table  
3.  
Table 2. Factors Contributing to the Level of Effectiveness of Teaching Strategies Utilized in Flexible  
Learning  
FACTORS  
YES  
F
NO  
F
P
P
A. Planning  
Teachers create partnerships with parents/guardians and colleagues  
85  
55.6%  
94.1%  
68  
9
44.4%  
5.9%  
Appropriate training of teachers to help them teach the class effectively 144  
during the flexible learning modality  
Effective planning by teachers on the adaptability of instruction  
142  
92.8%  
88.9%  
11  
18  
7.2%  
The online survey of schools, teachers, and students with their parents to 136  
determine the most appropriate flexible learning options  
11.8%  
Creation of school policies to cover flexible learning modalities  
B. MANAGEMENT  
146  
95.4%  
7
4.6%  
Maximization of time available for instruction  
Managing learner behavior to provide productive learning opportunities  
C. INSTRUCTION  
142  
147  
92.8%  
96.1%  
11  
6
7.2%  
3.9%  
Effective delivery of instruction  
145  
94.8%  
8
5.2%  
Page 9912  
Presentation of appropriate content  
152  
142  
139  
99.3%  
92.8%  
90.8%  
98.7%  
1
0.7%  
7.2%  
9.2%  
1.3%  
Active engagement of the students in the learning process  
Teacher’s assessment of students’ progress  
11  
14  
2
Effective communication skills are essential for a teacher to teach 151  
effectively  
The teacher engages students through creative, hands-on activities that 141  
foster a love of learning  
92.2%  
12  
7.8%  
D. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT  
The school caters to a positive learning environment, featuring the 128  
integration of technology in the classroom  
83.7%  
84.3%  
25  
27  
16.3%  
17.6%  
Minimal distractions, clear routine, positive atmosphere, and varied 129  
approaches and formats of teaching.  
Engaging and relevant curriculum.  
139  
142  
145  
90.8%  
92.8%  
94.8%  
15  
12  
8
9.8%  
7.8%  
5.2%  
Attention to student attendance and mobility.  
Appropriate behavioral interventions  
Planning  
Effective planning emerged as a crucial element in the success of teaching strategies. Creating partnerships  
with parents/guardians and colleagues was acknowledged by 55.6% of students, indicating the importance of  
collaborative efforts in supporting flexible learning. However, 44.4% did not see this as a contributing factor,  
suggesting variability in its implementation or impact.  
Appropriate training of teachers, with a striking 94.1% of students affirming its importance, underscores the  
need for educators to be well-prepared to navigate the challenges of flexible learning modalities. Similarly,  
effective planning for instruction, including the ability to incorporate necessary changes quickly, was  
recognized by 92.8% of students, highlighting the dynamic nature of flexible learning environments.  
Conducting online surveys to determine the most appropriate flexible learning options was seen as beneficial  
by 88.9% of students, emphasizing the value of stakeholder feedback in planning. Moreover, the creation of  
school policies to support flexible learning was deemed important by 95.4% of students, underscoring the  
necessity of institutional support and clear guidelines.  
Management  
Management factors were overwhelmingly recognized as contributing to the effectiveness of teaching  
strategies. Managing learner behavior to provide productive learning opportunities was identified by 96.1% of  
students, underscoring the importance of effective behavioral management in maintaining a focused and  
productive learning environment.  
Instruction  
Instructional factors were highly rated by students in terms of their contribution to the effectiveness of teaching  
strategies. Effective delivery of instruction was acknowledged by 94.8% of students, underscoring the need for  
clear and effective teaching methods. The presentation of appropriate content received the highest affirmation,  
Page 9913  
with 99.3% of students recognizing its importance, indicating that relevant and well-organized content is  
essential for effective learning.  
Active engagement of students in the learning process was seen as important by 92.8% of students, reinforcing  
the value of interactive and participatory teaching methods. Teachers’ assessment of students’ progress was  
recognized by 90.8% of students, highlighting the importance of regular and constructive feedback in  
supporting student learning.  
Effective communication skills were deemed crucial by 98.7% of students, emphasizing the role of clear and  
effective communication in teaching. Additionally, engaging students through creative, hands-on activities was  
considered important by 92.2% of students, indicating that innovative and interactive teaching methods can  
foster a love of learning.  
Learning Environment  
The learning environment also played a significant role in the effectiveness of teaching strategies. Offering a  
positive learning environment, including the use of technology and quality library resources, was recognized  
by 83.7% of students. This highlights the importance of a supportive and resource-rich environment in  
facilitating learning.  
Minimal distractions, clear routines, and varied teaching approaches were considered important by 84.3% of  
students, indicating a need for a structured and focused learning environment. An engaging and relevant  
curriculum was affirmed by 90.8% of students, emphasizing the importance of curriculum design in  
maintaining student interest and motivation.  
Attention to student attendance and mobility, as well as the use of appropriate behavioral interventions, was  
recognized by 92.8% and 94.8% of students, respectively, underscoring the importance of monitoring and  
supporting student behavior and engagement in the learning process.  
Overall, the data suggest that effective planning, management, instruction, and a supportive learning  
environment are all critical factors that contribute to the perceived effectiveness of teaching strategies in  
flexible learning. Effective planning involves meticulous preparation and foresight by instructors, including the  
development of comprehensive lesson plans, the incorporation of flexible learning modalities, and the  
establishment of clear objectives and outcomes. The high percentages of affirmation for planning-related  
factors, such as creating partnerships with parents and colleagues, providing appropriate teacher training, and  
developing school policies for flexible learning, underscore the importance of a solid foundation in ensuring  
instructional success. These elements of planning ensure that educators are well-prepared to meet the dynamic  
needs of students in a flexible learning environment, allowing for timely adjustments and the utilization of  
diverse teaching methods to enhance learning experiences.  
Management factors are equally significant, as maintaining an environment conducive to learning is essential  
for student success. This includes strategies for maximizing instructional time, managing learner behavior, and  
creating a structured yet adaptable classroom atmosphere. The data indicate that students highly value the  
ability of their instructors to manage these aspects effectively, as evidenced by the high percentages of  
affirmation for maintaining a conducive learning environment and managing learner behavior. Effective  
management ensures that students remain focused and engaged, reducing distractions and fostering a  
productive learning atmosphere. Additionally, the ability to maximize instructional time ensures that students  
receive the full benefit of the educational content, thereby further enhancing their overall learning experience.  
Instructional strategies are at the core of effective teaching, with factors such as the delivery of instruction,  
presentation of appropriate content, and active engagement of students being critical to their success. The data  
shows strong student support for these elements, highlighting the importance of clear and effective  
communication, relevant and well-organized content, and interactive teaching methods. These strategies not  
only facilitate comprehension but also encourage student participation and engagement, making learning more  
dynamic and enjoyable. Moreover, regular assessment and feedback are crucial for monitoring student  
Page 9914  
progress and identifying areas for improvement, ensuring that students receive the support they need to  
succeed.  
Finally, a supportive learning environment, characterized by the use of technology, a positive atmosphere, and  
attention to student needs, plays a vital role in the effectiveness of teaching strategies. The data indicate that  
students appreciate environments that minimize distractions, offer a clear routine, and provide varied  
approaches to teaching. Such environments are essential for accommodating diverse learning styles and  
preferences, ensuring that all students have the opportunity to thrive. The integration of technology, quality  
resources, and a focus on student well-being further enhances the learning experience, creating a holistic and  
supportive educational setting.  
Concludingly, the varied nature of effective teaching in flexible learning environments is evident from the  
high percentages of student affirmation across planning, management, instruction, and learning environment  
factors. Addressing these various aspects comprehensively ensures that students receive a well-rounded and  
effective education, tailored to their diverse needs and preferences. This holistic approach to teaching not only  
enhances academic outcomes but also fosters a positive and engaging learning experience for all students.  
Challenges the students encountered with the teaching strategies employed by their subject teachers for  
flexible learning  
This section examines the challenges students face with professors' teaching strategies in blended learning. By  
the term “challenges”, it pertains to the obstacles or difficulties that impede in achieving student’s expected  
learning outcomes. To gain a deeper understanding of these challenges, interviews were conducted, and  
participants were encouraged to share their thoughts on how these challenges affected their ability to engage  
with and benefit from the teaching strategies used in their courses.  
Table 3. Challenges the students encountered with the teaching strategies employed by their subject teachers  
for flexible learning  
Themes  
Dimensions (Subthemes)  
Collective Description  
Engagement Enigma:  
Teaching and  
Engagement Issues  
Reporting is ineffective teaching  
strategy Overwhelming online  
activities Lack of dynamic  
engagement and active learning  
opportunities Inappropriate  
behavior of professors during  
online classes  
Reporting is often not effective due to a  
lack of structured tasks, poor retention,  
dull presentation, and inadequate  
explanations. The challenges of online  
teaching are exacerbated by the sheer  
volume of assignments and a largely  
passive learning environment. This  
situation raises concerns among educators  
about their ability to meet professional  
standards, highlighting the urgent need for  
more engaging and effective online  
teaching methods.  
Complex and Misaligned  
Content: Academic  
Long-winded and Repetitive  
Material Conflicting Instructions  
and Rubrics  
This theme highlights the issues of long-  
winded and repetitive content that  
overwhelms students and impedes their  
ability to grasp key concepts. It also  
underscores the confusion caused by  
conflicting instructions and rubrics, which  
leave students uncertain about  
Material Difficulties  
expectations and hinder their academic  
Page 9915  
performance.  
Techno-Homebound  
Hurdles: Technological  
and Household  
Lack of or poor internet  
connectivity  
Refers to the persistent issue of poor or  
unreliable internet connectivity, which  
disrupts the continuity of online education  
and hampers access to essential resources.  
Additionally, it highlights the various  
distractions present in the household  
environment, from noisy surroundings to  
the demands of household chores and  
family responsibilities.  
Challenges  
Distractions from the household  
environment  
Wellness Woes: Health  
and Personal  
Health issues Poor self-discipline  
and time management  
Refers to the critical challenges students  
face concerning their physical and mental  
well-being, as well as their ability to  
manage time and maintain self-discipline.  
This theme highlights the health issues  
that arise from prolonged screen time and  
the stress associated with adapting to new  
learning strategies, which contribute to  
anxiety, frequent headaches, and  
Management  
deteriorating eyesight.  
Engagement Enigma: Teaching and Engagement Issues  
This refers to the challenges that hinder effective student participation in the blended learning modality.  
Professors often assign topics to students for reporting during online classes but fail to offer meaningful  
insights or guidance, which diminishes the educational value of the exercise and leaves students feeling  
unsupported and disengaged. Additionally, the persistence of an overwhelming volume of online activities,  
including assessments, readings, and tasks from multiple subjects, is particularly challenging to manage within  
limited time frames. This excessive workload can lead to burnout and a decline in motivation among students.  
The blended learning modality, particularly the conduct of online classes, often fails to recreate the interactive  
and spontaneous nature of in-person learning, resulting in a passive learning experience. Students also  
highlighted the importance of immediate feedback and opportunities for spontaneous discussions as crucial for  
deepening their understanding and keeping them engaged. Still, these elements are often missing in the digital  
classroom. “It means that you don’t get to talk to your professors and classmates in person, and it can be  
disappointing” (participant 1).  
Furthermore, students pointed out that there are behaviors exhibited by professors, such as being off-camera  
during the entire meeting, lacking spontaneity, making insensitive remarks, and creating an uncomfortable and  
ineffective learning environment. This behavior not only alienates students but also undermines the credibility  
and effectiveness of the teaching process.  
For the class to be academically productive, online classes need to be more interactive, and online blended  
learning modality should consider the necessities of the learning strategies to be utilized (Mahmood, 2020).  
The practice of not receiving proper feedback from professors leaves students feeling unsupported and  
disengaged, as they do not receive the necessary guidance or insights to enhance their understanding.  
Additionally, the overwhelming volume of online activities and assessments from multiple subjects  
exacerbates the problem, leading to burnout and decreased motivation among students. The excessive  
workload makes it difficult for students to maintain a balanced academic life, ultimately affecting their overall  
performance (Angdhiri, 2020; McMurtry, 2016).  
Another notable issue is the lack of dynamic engagement and active learning opportunities in online classes.  
The inability to recreate the interactive and spontaneous nature of in-person learning results in a passive  
learning experience, where students miss out on immediate feedback and opportunities for spontaneous  
Page 9916  
discussions. Professors should initiate the exploration of ideas to foster an active and learner-centered  
environment (ASU, 2021).  
Furthermore, unprofessional behaviors exhibited by some professors, such as being off-camera during  
meetings and making insensitive remarks, create an uncomfortable and ineffective learning environment.  
Irregular attendance of professors further disrupts the learning process, leaving students feeling unsupported  
and frustrated. Addressing these challenges is crucial to improving student engagement and participation in  
blended learning modalities, ensuring a more effective and enriching educational experience.  
Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive approach that encompasses improving teaching  
strategies, managing workloads effectively, ensuring regular attendance, and promoting professional conduct.  
By fostering a supportive and interactive learning environment, educators can help students overcome these  
obstacles and enhance their overall educational experience. This result highlights the need for a more  
responsive reform, shedding light on areas that require improvement to serve students and implement the  
institution’s mandate fully. As discussed by Handog (2020), although schools are not yet ready and face  
additional challenges, it will ultimately be beneficial to the education system in the long run.  
Complex and Misaligned Content: Academic Material Difficulties  
One of the significant challenges faced by students in contemporary educational settings, as reported by the  
respondents, is the prevalence of lengthy, verbose, and repetitive academic material. This issue is particularly  
problematic as it tends to overwhelm students, making it difficult for them to identify and grasp the key  
concepts essential for their learning. The redundancy in the material can lead to a lack of engagement and  
motivation, as students may feel inundated with information that does not contribute meaningfully to their  
understanding of the subject matter.  
Additionally, according to the participants, the lengthy and repetitive content impedes their ability to grasp and  
process lessons. Instead of focusing on the core ideas, students become bogged down by the volume of  
information, leading to confusion and frustration. This can result in diminished academic performance, as  
students struggle to discern the crucial elements of the curriculum from the extraneous details.  
In addition to the challenges posed by complex and misaligned content, students often face confusion due to  
conflicting instructions and rubrics. This theme underscores the inconsistency in guidelines provided by  
professors, which can leave students uncertain about what is expected of them. When instructions and rubrics  
are not aligned, students may struggle to understand the criteria for success, which can lead to anxiety and a  
decline in confidence in their abilities.  
The combination of long-winded, repetitive material and conflicting instructions and rubrics can have a  
detrimental impact on students' academic performance. When students are unable to focus on key concepts due  
to overwhelming content and are uncertain about expectations because of inconsistent guidelines, their ability  
to succeed is compromised. Thus, professors must recognize these issues and strive to create more streamlined  
and coherent academic materials (Mitchell, 2014). By reducing redundancy and ensuring that instructions and  
rubrics are clear and aligned, educators can help students better understand the essential concepts and meet the  
expected standards. This, in turn, can lead to improved engagement, motivation, and academic performance.  
Techno-Homebound Hurdles: Technological and Household Challenges  
In the context of blended learning, poor internet connectivity presents several challenges. For instance,  
students with unreliable internet may struggle to participate in live online sessions, access digital materials, or  
submit assignments on time, “The signal here in our area is so slow that I can’t even connect to the point that I  
have to go to our rooftop just to attend classes, submit paperwork or do the tasks online” (participant 1). This  
inconsistency can lead to gaps in learning and a fragmented educational experience. Educators, in turn, may  
find it difficult to implement synchronous teaching strategies, such as live lectures and real-time discussions,  
which are integral to the blended learning model. “Some of my peers and I faced difficulties due to limited  
Page 9917  
internet connectivity. This disparity in access created a learning gap, making it crucial for professors to  
consider these limitations while designing their teaching strategies” (participant 7).  
Moreover, the reliance on digital tools and platforms in blended learning means that poor internet connectivity  
can limit the use of interactive and multimedia resources. “Dealing with technical issues during online classes,  
such as poor internet connectivity or software glitches, can be incredibly frustrating” (participant 11).  
Educators may have to simplify or exclude these resources, thereby reducing the engagement and effectiveness  
of their teaching strategies. As a result, the intended benefits of blended learningsuch as increased  
flexibility, personalized learning, and enhanced interactivitymay not be fully realized for all students.  
In addition to technological challenges, the household environment presents numerous distractions that can  
impede both teaching and learning in blended learning modalities. Noisy surroundings, such as loud family  
members, household appliances, and neighborhood commotion, can significantly disrupt students' focus and  
concentration during online sessions. These auditory distractions make it difficult for students to engage fully  
with the material, leading to decreased comprehension and productivity.  
Furthermore, the demands of household chores and family responsibilities add another layer of complexity to  
the home learning environment. Students may be required to balance their academic responsibilities with tasks  
such as cooking, cleaning, and caring for younger siblings. “There are instances when I have to open my  
camera and I am carrying my brother, I spend 80% of my time dealing with all the household chores”  
(participant 5). This dual burden can create significant strain, leaving students with less time and energy to  
dedicate to their studies. Similarly, educators working from home may face their own set of household  
distractions, which can impact their ability to consistently prepare and deliver high-quality instruction.  
Wellness Woes: Health and Personal Management Challenges  
Health issues have emerged as a significant barrier to the effectiveness of teaching strategies within this  
modality. Prolonged screen time, a hallmark of online learning as part of the blended learning modality, can  
lead to various physical and mental health problems, including anxiety, frequent headaches, and deteriorating  
eyesight. “I experienced frequent headaches, and I also had eye checkups during one of those times since my  
vision got a little worse” (participant 6). Students who spend extended hours in front of screens are at risk of  
developing Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS), characterized by eye strain, dryness, and blurred vision. These  
symptoms can reduce students' ability to focus and engage with the material, thereby hindering their learning  
process. Additionally, the sedentary nature of online learning can contribute to physical discomfort and  
musculoskeletal problems, further impacting students' overall well-being and academic performance.  
Mental health issues, such as anxiety and stress, are also prevalent among students adapting to new learning  
strategies. The pressure to meet academic expectations, coupled with the challenges of navigating blended  
learning environments, leads to increased levels of stress and anxiety. These mental health concerns can impair  
cognitive functions, such as concentration and memory, making it difficult for students to absorb and retain  
information.  
In addition to health issues, poor self-discipline and time management are critical challenges that students face  
in blended learning environments. The flexibility offered by blended learning requires students to take greater  
responsibility for their learning, which can be difficult for those who struggle with self-discipline and time  
management.  
Time management is another crucial skill that students must develop to succeed in blended learning. In this  
modality, balancing online and face-to-face components, along with other personal and academic  
responsibilities, requires effective time management. Students who struggle with this skill may find themselves  
overwhelmed and unable to allocate sufficient time to each task. This can lead to a cycle of stress and poor  
performance, further exacerbating health issues and diminishing the overall effectiveness of blended learning  
strategies (Angdhiri, 2020).  
Page 9918  
CONCLUSION  
While policies and plans are in place for flexible learning, there are still shortcomings in their implementation  
that prevent them from being fully effective. As for the teaching strategies identified in this study, although  
appealing, the way teachers execute them does not guarantee that students will achieve the intended learning  
outcomes. The nature, therefore, of the flexible learning modality should be approached differently depending  
on the expected outcomes of the subject. However, on the part of the students, certain circumstances hinder  
their academic involvement, as they are differently situated in terms of financial aspects, family background,  
place of residence, and many other factors. There are still many areas to improve in the conduct of flexible  
learning, which is primarily based on the teaching strategies employed by teachers. As for the overall findings  
of the study, students had a variety of experiences, but most of them were related to their struggles in the new  
learning environment, which caused them financial burden, health problems, and disengagement from the  
learning process.  
REFERENCES  
1. Adnan, M. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of  
Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(2), 4551. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.2020261309  
2. Angdhiri. (2020). Challenges of home learning during a pandemic through the eyes of a student.  
Challenges of Home Learning during a Pandemic through the Eyes of a Student. Published.  
through-the-eyes-of-a-student.htmlASU-Angelo State University (2021). Theories of Education and the  
section_13.php  
3. Cassidy, A., Guopeng F., Valley W, Lomas, C., Jovel, E. & Riseman, A. (2016). Flexible Learning  
Strategies in First through Fourth-Year Courses. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 12,  
4. Crossland, A. & Ruedel, K. (2021). American Institutes for Research, Using Flexible Learning  
Strategies to Foster Equitable and Inclusive Education Opportunities  
5. CHED. (2020, September). Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning (No. 04).  
Flexible-Learning.pdfFirst Discoverers (2021). Child Development Theories: John Watson.  
6. Handog, M. C. (2020). The pandemic is reshaping education, here’s how the Philippines is coping. The  
Pandemic Is Reshaping Education, Here’s How the Philippines Is Coping. Published.  
education-philippinesLundin, R. (2012). Flexible Teaching and Learning: Perspectives and Practices.  
Sydney eScholarship Journals online. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229417091.pdf  
7. Magsambol, B. (2020b, July 22). FAST FACTS: CHED’s flexible learning. Rappler. Retrieved  
learningMahmood, S. (2020). Instructional Strategies for Online Teaching in COVID-19 Pandemic.  
8. McMurtry, K. (2016). Effective Teaching Practices in Online Higher Education. Effective Teaching  
Practices in Online Higher Education. NSU Works, College of Engineering and Computing. (372)  
9. Mitchell, A. (2014). Online Courses and Online Teaching Strategies in Higher Education. Creative  
Education. 05. 2017-2019. 10.4236/ce.2014.523225  
10. Skidmore (2021. Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment at Skidmore College. What techniques  
should we use to assess our students' learning?  
11. Teachnology (n.d.).  
trends/constructivism/piaget/ Zhu, E., Payet, P., DeZure, D., (2013). An Introduction to Teaching  
Online. CRLT Occasional Papers, 18  
Page 9919