ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 451
www.rsisinternational.org
Determinants of Students Intention to Use AI Chatbots in
Entrepreneurship Education: A Technology Acceptance Model
Perspective
Siti Nur Aisyah Alias
1*
, Atirah Sufian
1
, Mohd Fazli Mohd Sam
1
, Mohd Fauzi Kamarudin
1
, Norhidayah
Jamaluddin
1
, Thahira Bibi TKM Thangal
2
1
Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
2
Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Johor, Malaysia
*
Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.92800045
Received: 07 November 2025; Accepted: 14 November 2025; Published: 20 December 2025
ABSTRACTS
Entrepreneurship is central to achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and
Malaysia’s national strategies to create jobs, foster innovation, and encourage youth entrepreneurship.
Supporting this vision, Malaysian universities play a vital role in developing entrepreneurial mindsets, with AI
chatbots emerging as innovative tools in teaching and learning. This study investigates students’ intention to
use AI chatbots in entrepreneurship education across the Malaysian Technical University Network (MTUN),
using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) extended with perceived trust. Survey data from 377 students
revealed that perceived ease of use, usefulness, and trust significantly influence intention, explaining 71% of
the variance, with ease of use being the strongest predictor. The findings highlight the importance of user-
friendly, trustworthy, and effective chatbot systems to support entrepreneurial education and align with
national development goals.
Keywords: AI Chatbots, Entrepreneurship Education, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perceived Trust,
Students’ Intention
INTRODUCTION
Entrepreneurship education has emerged as a critical driver of innovation, economic resilience, and societal
progress in the 21st century. The Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE, 2023) underscores its rapid
evolution, propelled by technological advancements and the growing recognition of entrepreneurship as a
catalyst for sustainable growth. Globally, the educational technology market is projected to reach USD 404
billion by 2025, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 16.3% (HolonIQ, 2022), reflecting a
paradigm shift in how education is delivered and consumed. Among these technologies, artificial intelligence
(AI) has been identified as a transformative force, particularly through the integration of AI chatbots that are
redefining traditional pedagogical practices.
In Malaysia, the integration of AI in higher education has gained remarkable traction. A survey conducted by
the Malaysian Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC, 2023) reported that 75% of universities have begun
adopting AI-driven tools, including chatbots, to enrich learning experiences and strengthen student
engagement. These developments are aligned with the government’s National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap
2021-2025, which positions AI as a strategic enabler across sectors, including education (MDEC, 2021). Such
initiatives demonstrate Malaysia’s commitment to preparing students for the digital economy while
simultaneously advancing its entrepreneurial ecosystem.
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 452
www.rsisinternational.org
Scholarly evidence supports the potential of AI chatbots in education. Studies highlight their ability to provide
personalized learning pathways, real-time feedback, and access to vast resources (Ratten & Jones, 2021), with
the AI in education market expected to grow at a CAGR of 23.3% between 2021 and 2026
(MarketsandMarkets, 2023). In the Malaysian context, this growth trajectory aligns with national policies such
as the Entrepreneur Development Policy 2030, which targets the creation of 100,000 new entrepreneurs, and
the National Entrepreneurship Policy 2030, which emphasizes innovation-led learning environments. The
integration of AI chatbots into entrepreneurship education is therefore not only a technological enhancement
but also a strategic mechanism to foster creativity, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention among students
(Shabbir, Batool & Mahmood, 2022).
Despite this promise, the behavioral intention to use AI chatbots in higher education, particularly in
entrepreneurship education remains underexplored. Previous studies (e.g., Kim, Park, & Kim, 2021; Tan, Lim
& Ng, 2022) indicate that intention to adopt AI technologies is shaped by perceived ease of use, perceived
usefulness, perceived trust and institutional support. However, limited empirical research has examined these
factors within the Malaysian higher education context, where the entrepreneurial agenda is closely tied to
national development goals. Understanding how students, particularly those in technical universities, perceive
and are willing to adopt AI chatbots for entrepreneurship education is therefore both timely and crucial.
Building on this concern, artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly transformed industries and educational
landscapes, offering intelligent systems capable of learning, adapting, and supporting decision-making (Russell
& Norvig, 2016). Nevertheless, while AI technologies have long enhanced commercial practices, their
application in entrepreneurship is still emerging, with scholars noting both opportunities and theoretical
challenges for entrepreneurial practice (Townsend et al., 2018; Obschonka & Audretsch, 2020). Despite AI’s
recognized potential, its integration into entrepreneurship education, especially through AI chatbots, remains
underexplored. Existing studies have primarily examined AI in broader educational contexts (Clarizia et al.,
2018; Agarwal et al., 2022), thereby leaving a significant gap in understanding how AI chatbots can effectively
foster entrepreneurial learning, competencies, and intentions.
This gap is especially pronounced in Malaysia, where AI adoption has become a national priority under the
National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 and the MTUN Advanced TVET 2030 initiative. These
policies seek to elevate Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and entrepreneurship
education to parity with mainstream academic pathways, equipping students not only with technical expertise
but also entrepreneurial and soft skills (The Star, 2024). Within this agenda, the Malaysian Technical
University Network (MTUN) has strategically introduced AI chatbots into its curriculum, positioning them as
tools to deliver personalized learning experiences, real-time feedback, and innovation-driven outcomes.
However, while such adoption reflects institutional commitment, little is known about how students perceive,
accept, and intend to use AI chatbots in entrepreneurship education.
Understanding these factors is critical. According to the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, Bagozzi &
Warshaw, 1989), perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, and trust strongly influence technology adoption. Yet,
within the context of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia, empirical evidence on these determinants
remains scarce. Moreover, Amara’s Law (Amara, 1984) cautions against overestimating short-term capabilities
of AI while underestimating its long-term impact, underscoring the need for realistic insights into students’
expectations and readiness.
Therefore, a pressing problem emerges despite global enthusiasm for AI in education and Malaysia’s proactive
adoption of AI-driven tools, there is insufficient empirical research on the behavioral intention of students to
use AI chatbots in entrepreneurship education. Without such understanding, universities risk misaligning
technological investments with learners’ needs, thereby limiting the effectiveness of AI in strengthening
entrepreneurial competencies. Addressing this problem is essential to inform educational strategies, support
national policy goals, and prepare future entrepreneurs for success in the digital economy.
Accordingly, this study investigates the factors influencing the intention to use AI chatbots in entrepreneurship
education among students with a focus on Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMP), Universiti
Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) and Universiti Malaysia
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 453
www.rsisinternational.org
Perlis (UniMAP). Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, Bagozzi & Warshaw, 1989) and
extended constructs of trust and institutional support, the research aims to provide empirical insights into
students’ readiness to adopt AI-driven tools in their entrepreneurial learning processes. By doing so, it
contributes to the growing body of knowledge on AI adoption in education and offers practical implications for
policymakers and educators seeking to strengthen Malaysia’s entrepreneurial ecosystem in the digital era.
Entrepreneurship Education
Entrepreneurship education is rapidly expanding worldwide due to its ability to connect theory with real-world
practice. In fact, over 70% of universities are incorporating it into their curricula, reflecting the government’s
vision to strengthen the entrepreneurial ecosystem (MOHE, 2022). Typically, it is delivered through three
approaches: education "about" entrepreneurship, which provides theoretical foundations; education "for"
entrepreneurship, which develops students’ entrepreneurial skills; and education "through" entrepreneurship,
which emphasizes experiential learning through real-world projects. Moreover, Artificial Intelligence (AI),
particularly generative AI, has strong potential to transform entrepreneurship education, especially in the
"about" approach by generating and presenting information traditionally delivered by lecturers. This shift,
therefore, could redefine the educator’s role from knowledge transmission to facilitating deeper understanding
and application. Taken together, these approaches ensure students gain not only knowledge but also the skills
and experience needed to succeed in an evolving entrepreneurial landscape.
Building on this foundation, universities adopt experiential and problem-based learning, industry partnerships,
and entrepreneurship centers to build students’ creativity, problem-solving skills, and entrepreneurial self-
efficacy (Lee et al., 2023; Vivekananth et al., 2023). At the same time, national policies, including the
Entrepreneur Development Policy 2030 and the National Entrepreneurship Policy 2030, aim to nurture
100,000 new entrepreneurs and foster innovation. Consequently, Malaysia’s strong ranking in the Global
Entrepreneurship Index further highlights these efforts. Looking forward, the integration of innovative
technologies such as AI chatbots is expected to enhance students’ learning experiences and entrepreneurial
competencies.
In parallel, entrepreneurship education in Malaysia has rapidly expanded, with more than 70% of universities
embedding entrepreneurship courses, reflecting the government’s strategic commitment to strengthening the
entrepreneurial ecosystem (MOHE, 2022). Specifically, universities employ experiential, problem-based, and
industry-linked pedagogies that enhance students’ creativity, problem-solving, and entrepreneurial self-
efficacy, significantly increasing their intentions to start businesses (Ismail et al., 2021; Rahim & Isa, 2023).
Furthermore, supported by national strategies such as the Entrepreneur Development Policy 2030, which
targets 100,000 new entrepreneurs (Entrepreneur Development Policy, 2021), and initiatives like the Malaysian
Global Innovation & Creativity Centre (MaGIC, 2021), the country has built a robust entrepreneurship support
infrastructure. Additionally, Malaysia’s ranking in the Global Entrepreneurship Index (Statista.com, 2022) and
the establishment of Entrepreneurship Development Centers across universities (Lee, Tan & Low, 2023)
further underscore this progress. Ultimately, integrating innovative technologies such as AI chatbots is
expected to enrich entrepreneurial education and strengthen students’ competencies.
Intention to use Artificial Intelligence Chatbot
The intention to use AI chatbots is shaped by key factors from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),
including perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, enjoyment, and social influence (Smith & Jones, 2023; Chen
et al., 2023; Lee & Park, 2023). Positive perceptions of efficiency, convenience, and reliability enhance user
attitudes, leading to higher adoption rates. For businesses, fostering trust and creating engaging, user-friendly
chatbot experiences is essential to strengthen user intentions, which in turn drive customer satisfaction, loyalty,
and overall performance.
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), developed by Davis (1989) and expanded from the Theory of
Reasoned Action, is widely used to explain users’ adoption of new technologies. Its core constructs: perceived
usefulness and perceived ease of use have been shown to significantly influence technology adoption, with
perceived trust increasingly recognized as an additional determinant (Ayanwale & Molefi, 2024). Studies
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 454
www.rsisinternational.org
further highlight the role of individual, social, and environmental factors in shaping user intentions (Teo et al.,
2021). As such, TAM provides a robust framework for examining the relationship between predictors and
intention to use AI in educational settings.
Perceived ease of use (PEOU) is a key determinant of AI chatbot adoption in entrepreneurship education. It
reflects how simple users find the technology to operate (Davis, 1989) and strongly influences attitudes and
intentions toward usage. Studies show that when students view chatbots as intuitive and user-friendly, they are
more likely to integrate them into learning (Chang & Wu, 2023; Liu & Zhou, 2022). PEOU also mediates the
relationship between attitudes and behavioral intentions (Wang & Li, 2023), highlighting its critical role in
shaping acceptance. Ensuring ease of use is therefore essential for successful integration of AI chatbots in
Malaysian higher education.
Perceived usefulness (PU) is a central factor influencing students’ acceptance of AI chatbots in
entrepreneurship education. Defined as the belief that a system enhances performance (Zulfiqar et al., 2021),
PU has been consistently shown to predict usage intentions. Studies highlight that accurate, reliable, and
beneficial chatbot functionalities increase students’ satisfaction and intention to adopt them (Almahri et al.,
2020; Malik et al., 2021). When students view chatbots as tools that support academic goals through instant
access, personalized support, and interactive learning, they develop positive attitudes toward their use. In line
with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), PU strongly drives the adoption of AI chatbots in Malaysian
higher education.
Perceived trust is a key determinant in the adoption of AI chatbots, reflecting users’ confidence in the
technology’s credibility, reliability, and security (Liden & Nilros, 2020; Winkler & Soellner, 2018). Research
shows that students are more likely to use chatbots when they trust their accuracy, dependability, and ability to
safeguard personal data (Gallimore et al., 2019; Pillai et al., 2023). In entrepreneurship education, trust
enhances students’ motivation to engage with chatbots, particularly when sharing personal information for
tailored support. Building trust requires reliable performance, clear responses, secure data handling, and
advanced conversational capabilities. Overall, trust plays a pivotal role in fostering acceptance and effective
use of AI chatbots in educational settings.
METHODOLOGY
This study employed a quantitative research design to investigate the factors influencing university students’
intention to use artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in entrepreneurship education. The Technology Acceptance
Model (TAM) served as the theoretical framework, with three independent variables (perceived ease of use,
perceived usefulness, and perceived trust) and one dependent variable (intention to use AI chatbots). A cross-
sectional survey method was selected to collect data from students at Malaysian Technical University Network
(MTUN).
The target population consisted of undergraduate students enrolled at MTUN, as they represent the primary
group exposed to entrepreneurship-related courses and emerging digital learning tools. A simple random
sampling technique was applied to ensure equal probability of selection and minimize sampling bias. Based on
Krejcie and Morgan’s (1970) sampling table, a sample size of 377 students was deemed sufficient to represent
the population and provide statistical validity. Moreover, random sampling was aimed to look at the three
elements of the sample respondents, namely types of MTUN institution, the years of study and engineering
students with entrepreneurship education experiences. The selection of these elements was based on the data
requirements for this research. Typically, this type of sampling is biased. However, the findings of the research
using sampling are not representative or descriptive of the population, but rather provide an initial image of the
field of study (Fruth et al., 2019). The result of the sample information obtained in this study are as shown in
Table 1 below.
Table 1: Respondents’ Sample
No.
MTUN Institution
Location
Number of samples
1
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
Johor
103
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 455
www.rsisinternational.org
(UTHM)
2
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM)
Melaka
101
3
Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP)
Pahang
98
4
Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)
Perlis
75
Instrument Design
Data were collected using a structured questionnaire comprising three main sections:
Section
Variables
A
Demographic Information
B
Independent Variable 1: Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)
Independent Variable 2: Perceived Usefulness (PU)
Independent Variable 3: Perceived Trust (PT)
C
Dependent Variable: Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence Chatbot
The questionnaire used in this study was adapted from Ayanwale and Molef's (2024) and Yap and Kamaruddin
(2023) research. While their original framework provided a foundation, modifications were made to align the
questions with the specific context and objectives of this research. This approach ensured that the
questionnaire was both relevant to the research topic and suitable for the target audience, enhancing the
validity of the data collected. All items were adapted from validated scales (Davis, 1989; Gefen et al., 2003)
and measured on a five-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree). Data were collected
over six weeks (MarchApril 2024) through online distribution via university learning platforms and official
student networks, ensuring voluntary participation and confidentiality.
Pilot Test
A pilot study with 38 respondents (10% of the total sample) confirmed clarity and reliability. Cronbach’s alpha
values ranged between 0.745 and 0.844, indicating acceptable to very good reliability (see Table 2).
Table 2: Pilot Test’s Reliability Statistics
Variables
Cronbach’s
alpha
Reliability
Independent Variable 1: Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)
0.775
Good
Independent Variable 2: Perceived Usefulness (PU)
0.830
Very Good
Independent Variable 3: Perceived Trust (PT)
0.745
Good
Dependent Variable: Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence Chatbot
0.844
Very Good
The table presents the results of the reliability test for the pilot study. The highest Cronbach’s alpha value,
0.844, was found for the scale measuring the intention to use artificial intelligence chatbots. On the other hand,
the lowest Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.745 was for the perceived trust (PT) scale. All the scales were deemed
reliable, as the Cronbach’s alpha values for all variables were greater than 0.6.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In terms of gender, most respondents are female students which totals up to 233 people (61.8%) and the rest
are male students which totals up to 144 people (38.2%). In terms of MTUN institutions participation, the
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 456
www.rsisinternational.org
majority of respondents are from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) with 103 students (27.3%),
followed by Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) with 101 students (26.8%), Universiti Malaysia
Pahang (UMP) with 98 students (26%) and Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) with 75 students (19.9%).
Year 4 students dominate the number of respondents with 113 students (30%), followed by year 2 students
with 111 students (29.4%), year 1 students with 93 students (24.7%) and year 3 students with 60 students
(15.9%).
Table 3: Model Summary of Multiple Regression Analysis
Model Summary
b
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the
Estimate
1
0.847
a
0.717
0.715
1.77094
1. Predictors: (Constant), PEOU, PU, PT, ITU
2. Dependent Variable: (DV)
The multiple regression model summary revealed a strong relationship between the variables, as the value is
greater than 0.5. The independent variables, Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), and
Perceived Trust (PT) were found to be relevant and closely related to the dependent variable, which is the
intention to use artificial intelligence chatbots. The R-squared value of 0.717 suggests that 71% of the variation
in the dependent variable can be explained by the three independent variables. The Adjusted R Square of
0.847, which accounts for the number of predictors and the sample size, further confirmed the robustness and
good fit of the model. The standard error of the estimate (1.77094) suggested a relatively low average
deviation between the observed and predicted intention to use AI Chatbot scores, indicating a reasonably
accurate model. Collectively, these results strongly suggested that the chosen independent variables provided a
compelling explanation for the variations observed in intention to use AI Chatbot in Entrepreneurial Education
among MTUN students.
Table 4: Regression Analysis on ANOVA
ANOVA
a
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
2965.624
3
988.541
315.201
<0,001
b
Residual
1169.813
373
3.136
Total
4135.438
376
1. Dependent Variable: DV
2. Predictors: (Constant), PT, PEOU, PU
The ANOVA analysis further supported the significance of the regression model in explaining the variation in
intention to use AI Chatbot (F = 315.201, p < 0.001). With three predictors (Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived
Usefulness, and Perceived Trust), the substantially larger regression sum of squares (2965.624) compared to
the residual sum of squares (1169.813) clearly demonstrated that the model explained a significant portion of
the variance in the dependent variable. The high F-value, derived from the mean square for regression
(988.541) and the mean square for residual (3.136), unequivocally confirmed the strong explanatory power of
the model. This statistical significance underscored the crucial role of Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived
Usefulness, and Perceived Trust in intention to use AI Chatbot in Entrepreneurial Education among MTUN
students.
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 457
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 5: Regression Analysis on Coefficients
Coefficients
a
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
2.382
0 .600
3.967
<0.001
PEOU
0.539
0.063
0.437
8.550
<0.001
PU
0.285
0.064
0.234
4.444
<0.001
PT
0.296
0.039
0.274
7.584
<0.001
1. Dependent Variable: DV
The coefficients for the regression analysis, presented in Table 3, indicated the individual contribution of each
predictor variable to intention to use AI Chatbot in Entrepreneurial Education. Perceived Ease of Use exhibited
the highest positive beta value = 0.437, p < 0.001), signifying that it had the most substantial positive effect
on intention to use AI Chatbot compared to the other two variables. Perceived Trust = 0.274, p < 0.001) and
Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.234, p < 0.001) also demonstrated significant positive beta values, indicating their
important contributions to the dependent variable. These results suggested that while all three independent
variables were significant predictors of intention to use AI Chatbot.
The p-values for all hypothesized relationships were below the critical threshold of 0.05, confirming their
statistical significance and supporting the acceptance of all proposed hypotheses. The results clearly indicate
that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and perceived trust each exhibit a significant positive
relationship with the intention to use AI chatbots in entrepreneurial education. These findings highlight that the
three factors are valid, reliable, and impactful determinants, underscoring their critical role in fostering the
adoption of AI chatbot technology.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study corroborate the growing global recognition of the importance of technology
adoption in advancing educational practices, particularly within entrepreneurial education. The coefficients for
the regression analysis, presented in Table 3, indicated the individual contribution of each predictor variable to
the intention to use AI chatbots in entrepreneurial education. Perceived ease of use exhibited the highest
positive beta value = 0.437, p < 0.001), signifying that it had the most substantial effect on intention to use
AI chatbots compared to the other two variables. Perceived trust = 0.274, p < 0.001) and perceived
usefulness (β = 0.234, p < 0.001) also demonstrated significant positive beta values, indicating their important
contributions to the dependent variable. These results suggest that while all three independent variables are
significant predictors of intention to use AI chatbots, perceived ease of use emerges as the most influential
factor in driving adoption.
The p-values for all hypothesized relationships were below the critical threshold of 0.05, confirming their
statistical significance and supporting the acceptance of all proposed hypotheses. Descriptive analysis further
supported these findings, with respondents expressing positive perceptions regarding the simplicity of
interacting with AI chatbots, their trust in the reliability of the technology, and the usefulness of chatbots as a
learning tool. This alignment between descriptive and inferential results underscores the argument that AI
chatbots hold considerable potential to enhance both teaching and learning experiences in entrepreneurial
education.
Collectively, this study provides robust empirical evidence of the significant influence of perceived ease of
use, perceived usefulness, and perceived trust on the adoption of AI chatbot technology in entrepreneurial
education. Perceived ease of use plays a particularly critical role by lowering barriers to adoption and
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 458
www.rsisinternational.org
increasing willingness to integrate technology into learning activities. Perceived usefulness reinforces adoption
by demonstrating the practical benefits of AI chatbots in improving learning outcomes, while perceived trust
alleviates concerns about reliability, credibility, and privacy, thereby strengthening students’ confidence in
using the technology.
LIMITATION AND FUTURE RESEARCH
While this study offers valuable empirical insights, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the
findings are limited in generalizability as the sample was drawn exclusively from MTUN institutions, which
may not fully represent the diversity of Malaysian higher education contexts. Future studies should extend to
public and private universities to strengthen external validity. Second, the cross-sectional design restricts
causal interpretations and does not capture temporal shifts in students’ attitudes toward AI. Longitudinal or
experimental research could track changes in perception and sustained adoption patterns over time. Third, the
quantitative-only approach provides breadth but not depth in understanding students’ lived experiences. Future
studies could adopt mixed-method designs, incorporating interviews or focus groups to capture richer
pedagogical and emotional dimensions of AI chatbot use. Finally, exploring moderating factors such as digital
literacy, learning culture, and institutional support could yield more comprehensive insights into AI integration
success.
Contribution
This study advances theory and practice in three significant ways. Theoretically, it validates the Technology
Acceptance Model (TAM) within the domain of AI-driven entrepreneurship education, confirming perceived
ease of use, usefulness, and trust as strong determinants of behavioral intention. Practically, the results suggest
that educators and technopreneurs should collaborate to co-design AI chatbot systems that are user-friendly,
context-sensitive, and pedagogically aligned. For example, educators could provide real-world
entrepreneurship scenarios, while technopreneurs develop adaptive AI algorithms that personalize guidance
and feedback. Such collaboration ensures that chatbot tools not only deliver content but also foster critical
thinking, creativity, and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Managerially, institutions can leverage these findings to
design professional development programs that build educator confidence in using AI and to establish policies
ensuring ethical, transparent, and privacy-respecting AI deployment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledged the Sustainable IT-economics, Information Systems, Technology
Management & Technopreneurship (SuITE) research group of Center for Technopreneurship Development (C-
TeD), the financial support through the publication incentive and the Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan
Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the
authors.
REFERENCES
1. Agarwal, R., Kumar, S., & Verma, R. (2022). Innovative strategies for engaging students with AI.
Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 123-134.
2. Almahri, S. A., et al. (2020). Students' satisfaction with AI chatbots: The role of perceived usefulness.
Computers & Education, 146, Article 103773.
3. Amara, R. (1984). Amara’s Law: Understanding the impact of technological change. Futures, 16(5), 432-
438.
4. Ayanwale, M. A., & Molefi, R. R. (2024). Exploring intention of undergraduate students to embrace
chatbots: from the vantage point of Lesotho. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 21(1), 20.
5. Chang, H. H., & Wu, S. Y. (2023). The impact of perceived ease of use on AI chatbot acceptance among
university students. Computers & Education, 176, Article 104324.
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 459
www.rsisinternational.org
6. Chen, Q., Lu, Y., Gong, Y., & Xiong, J. (2023). Can AI chatbots help retain customers? Impact of AI
service quality on customer loyalty. Internet Research, 33(6), 2205-2243.
7. Clarizia, F., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., & Santaniello, D. (2018). Chatbot: An education
support system for students. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 11209, 101-112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01159-8_9
8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A
comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
9. Fruth, E., Kvistad, M., Marshall, J., Pfeifer, L., Rau, L., Sagebiel, J., ... & Winiarski, B. (2019).
Economic valuation of street-level urban greening: A case study from an evolving mixed-use area in
Berlin. Land Use Policy, 89, 104237.
10. Gallimore, P., et al. (2019). The role of trust in technology adoption: A systematic literature review.
Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 601-615.
11. HolonIQ. (2022). Global educational technology market projections. Retrieved from
https://www.holoniq.com/edtech
12. Ismail, S. M., et al. (2021). Impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intentions and
competencies: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(3), 1-20.
13. Kim, J., Park, H., & Kim, D. (2021). Factors influencing students' intention to use AI chatbots in
learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology, Volume (Issue).
14. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
15. Lee, H., & Park, J. (2023). Trust, perceived enjoyment, and social influence in AI chatbot adoption.
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 35, 45-56.
16. Lee, K. H., Tan, S. W., & Low, C. Y. (2023). Entrepreneurship Development Centers in Malaysian
universities: Enhancing entrepreneurial capabilities through tailored programs. Journal of Business
Venturing, 40(1), 1-18.
17. Lee, K. H., Tan, S. W., & Low, C. Y. (2023). Entrepreneurship Development Centers in Malaysian
universities: Enhancing entrepreneurial capabilities through tailored programs. Journal of Business
Venturing, 40(1), 1-18.
18. Liden, R. C., & Nilros, J. (2020). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. SAGE
Publications.
19. Liu, Y., & Zhou, M. (2022). Perceived ease of use and intention to adopt AI chatbots: Evidence from
educational settings. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 183-197.
20. Malaysian Global Innovation & Creativity Centre (MaGIC). (2021). Supporting student entrepreneurs
through mentorship and funding.
21. Malik, A., et al. (2021). Utilization of chatbots for educational purposes: The role of perceived
usefulness among university students. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 371-387.
22. MarketsandMarkets. (2023). Growth projections for AI chatbots in education.
https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/chatbot-market72302363.html
23. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). (2022). Integration of entrepreneurship courses in
Malaysian universities.
24. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). (2022). Integration of entrepreneurship courses in
Malaysian universities. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). (2023). Report on the field of
entrepreneurship education.
25. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). (2022). Integration of entrepreneurship courses in
Malaysian universities.
26. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). (2023). Report on the field of entrepreneurship
education. https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/index.php/en/graduate/44-entrepreneurship-development-policy
27. Obschonka, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: A
new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55, 529- 542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00202-
4
28. Pillai, A., et al. (2023). Trust and technology adoption: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of
Business Research, 136, 532-543.
ICTMT 2025 | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
ISSN: 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS
Special Issue | Volume IX Issue XXVIII November 2025
Page 460
www.rsisinternational.org
29. Rahim, A. R. A., & Isa, N. M. (2023). Blending theoretical knowledge with practical business
challenges: A case study of entrepreneurship education at Universiti 75 Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
(UTeM). Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 26(1), 1-15.
30. Ratten, V., & Jones, P. (2021). Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world
application in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 24(3), 1-12.
31. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
32. Shabbir, M. S., Batool, T., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Enhancing students' entrepreneurial intentions and
competencies through AI. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation.
33. Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2023). Perceived usefulness and ease of use as determinants of AI chatbot
adoption. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 45(2), 123- 135.
34. Statista.com. (2022). Global Entrepreneurship Index: Malaysia's ranking and factors influencing
entrepreneurial ecosystem.
35. Tan, J., Lim, K., & Ng, W. (2022). Institutional support and AI chatbot adoption among Malaysian
university students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems.
36. Teo, T. (2021). Pre-service teachers' intention to use educational chatbots: A structural equation modeling
approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 643-662.
37. Teo, T., et al. (2021). Predicting intention to use technology in educational settings: A comprehensive
review of individual and contextual factors. Computers & Education, 158, Article 104111.
38. The Star. (2024). MTUN Advanced TVET 2030 initiative: Elevating technical education. Retrieved from
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2024/06/23/game-changer-fortvet
39. Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2018). Uncertainty, knowledge
problems, and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 659-687.
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0108
40. Vivekananth, S., Indiran, L., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2023). The influence of entrepreneurship education on
university Students' entrepreneurship self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Technical
Education and Training, 15(4), 129-142.
41. Winkler, A., & Soellner, M. (2018). Trust in health information sources: Survey analysis on the
determinants of trust. Journal of Public Health, 26(5), 537-544.
42. Wang, Q., & Li, S. (2023). Perceived ease of use as a mediator in the attitude intention-behavior model:
The case of AI chatbots in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 312-329.
43. Yap, Z. Y., & Kamaruddin, N. K. (2023). The intention to use smart home Internet of Things (IoT)
among Generation Y: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Research in
Management of Technology and Business, 4(1), 637648. https://doi.org/10.30880/rmtb.2023.04.01.044
44. Zulfiqar, U., et al. (2021). Perceived usefulness as a determinant of consumers' usage intentions: A
review. Journal of Business Research, 128, 889-901.