11
that integrates religious, ethical, and practical dimensions, aiming to harmonize divine imperatives with
contemporary governance and social needs (Kurbiyanto et al., 2024; Musa & Shahlehi, 2025; Mowlana, 2013).
This review synthesizes theoretical foundations and practical insights to advance the discourse on Islamic
advocacy in food security.
METHODS
This review employs a meta-analytical approach, synthesizing findings from empirical studies, policy analyses,
and case studies across Muslim-majority countries (2018–2024). Data sources include:
Peer-reviewed articles on Islamic ethics, food security, and social finance.
Policy documents and institutional reports from OIC countries.
Case studies on digital innovation, participatory governance, and food justice interventions.
All claims are supported by direct citations from the aggregated findings structure and meta-analysis.
RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
1. Islamic Ethical Principles in Food Security Advocacy
Islamic advocacy for food security is grounded in a constellation of ethical principles:
Tawhid (Oneness of God): Promotes unity, systemic integration, and participatory governance,
emphasizing consultation (shūrā), integrity (amānah), and justice (Kurbiyanto et al., 2024; Ruhullah &
Ushama, 2024).
Ihsan (Excellence in Conduct): Structures decision-making to prioritize human dignity, societal welfare,
and environmental stewardship (Khakim et al., 2024).
Amr bi al-ma’ruf wa nahy’an al munkar: Commanding right and forbidding wrong, guiding moral
responsibility in food systems (Kurbiyanto et al., 2024; Mowlana, 2013).
Ummah (Community) & Taqwa (Piety): Foster collective welfare and spiritual
accountability (Kurbiyanto et al., 2024; Mowlana, 2013).
Justice (‘Adl), Moderation (Wasatiyyah), Avoidance of Harm (Darar), Preservation of Life (Hifz
al-Nafs): Ensure equitable access, responsible consumption, and protection of vulnerable
groups (Jureidini et al., 2025; Ahmad et al., 2025).
These principles extend beyond legal justice to encompass broader moral values derived from the Quran and
Hadith, promoting social justice and dispute resolution in food security contexts (Tarantang, 2019).
2. Halalan Tayyiban and Food Justice
The concept of Halalan Tayyiban integrates lawful (halal) and wholesome (tayyib) food, requiring ethical
sourcing, production, and equitable access. It mandates active stakeholder involvement and compliance with
Shariah law throughout the supply chain (Musa&Shahlehi, 2025; Salisu et al., 2025; Idris et al., 2022). Food
justice, as articulated in Islamic ethics, emphasizes the right to culturally appropriate, nutritious food, especially
for vulnerable populations such as migrant workers (Jureidini et al., 2025).
3. Institutional and Jurisprudential Interpretations
Diverse Islamic jurisprudential schools (Maliki, Hanafi, Shafi'i) interpret these principles variably, affecting
practical rulings on waqf, istihalah, and alternative protein sources (Haddad, 2012; Alkhan &Hassan, 2025).
Institutional models, such as interconnected departments governed by a Moslem Council, aim to harmonize
divine orders with human behavior for sustainable food security (Haddad, 2012).
Islamic ethical principles provide a robust foundation for food security advocacy, but their operationalization
requires nuanced understanding of jurisprudential diversity and institutional adaptation.