Political Coercion and its Role in the Spread of the Culture of Banality in
Islamic Societies, and the Islamic Da'wah Methodology for its Treatment
Mostafa Hassan Mohamed El Khayat, Mohammad Ishaque Husain, Mohd Taufiq Bin Abd Talib
Faculty of Contemporary Islamic Studies (FKI), University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.930000002
Received: 10 December 2025; Accepted: 18 December 2025; Published: 24 December 2025
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the socio-political dynamics between political coercion and the proliferation of the
"culture of banality" within contemporary Islamic societies. While traditional discourses often treat cultural
decline as a purely moral or individual issue, this research argues that the systematic marginalization of
intellectual depth is a strategic structural byproduct of restrictive political environments. Using a conceptual-
analytical approach, the paper identifies the causal link where political coercion (Independent Variable) leads to
a contraction of the public sphere, forcing collective consciousness to retreat into "safe," banal interests
(Dependent Variable). Furthermore, the study critiques current Da’wah methodologies for failing to address
these structural roots. It proposes a revitalized, interventionist Da’wah framework grounded in "Critical
Consciousness" and "Media Literacy." By shifting from normative preaching to an educational model, the
proposed methodology aims to reclaim the intellectual integrity of the Muslim mind and counter the systematic
spread of manufactured triviality.
Keywords: Political Coercion; Culture of Banality; Islamic Da’wah; Critical Consciousness; Public Sphere;
Media Literacy; Digital Asceticism; Social Re-engineering.
INTRODUCTION
In the contemporary era, Islamic societies face a dual challenge: the external pressure of political coercion and
the internal erosion of intellectual depth, a phenomenon often referred to as the "Culture of Banality."
Traditionally, academic inquiry has frequently separated political structures from cultural outcomes, treating
them as independent spheres. However, this study posits that the rise of triviality is not an accidental byproduct
of modernity, but is strategically facilitated by restrictive political environments (Kawakibi, n.d.).
When political coercion limits critical engagement and suppresses dissent, the collective consciousness often
retreats into "safe," banal interests and superficial discourses. This environment causes public discourse to mirror
the vacuous echo chambers of fleeting digital trends, effectively leading society to "amuse itself to death"
(Postman, 1985). Ultimately, this pervasive triviality is not merely a collection of individual failings; it represents
a systemic re-engineering of collective consciousness, designed to neutralize the intellectual vigor essential for
communal flourishing and reform.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
The relationship between the variables in this study is established as a systemic causal link. Drawing on the
political philosophy of Hannah Arendt (1958), the study argues that the contraction of the public sphere—driven
by political pressure—inevitably leads to a loss of meaningful human agency. In our proposed model, this
interaction creates an intellectual vacuum that is strategically filled by superficiality.
The framework is operationalized through the following variables:
Independent Variable (IV): Political Coercion. This includes institutional mechanisms such as
censorship, the systematic marginalization of dissent, and the restriction of academic and intellectual
freedoms.