is too simplistic, neglecting the complex layers of worldly motivations that also drive individuals (Fadillah et
al., 2021). Some go there seeking peace from life's pressures, some consider it a symbol of social status, and
some even see it as a tourism opportunity while worshipping—a hybridization of intentions that blurs the lines
between the spiritual and the material. Aini et al.'s (2020) research highlights how societal perceptions of Umrah
as a ‘lifestyle’ also influence motivation, a view inconsistent with the original concept of worship. This raises
the question: to what extent do these mixed intentions affect the quality of transformation experienced? The
aspect of forgiveness, moreover, is another narrative requiring deeper investigation. Within the framework of
Islamic theology, forgiveness of sins is a central promise of Umrah, an absolute purification. But what about
self-forgiveness? Fauzi's (2022) study briefly touches on the psychological pressure experienced by pilgrims
carrying the burden of past sins, but does not specifically examine the intra-psychic process of how forgiveness
is subjectively realized. Is it merely the utterance of istighfar, or a deeper process of acceptance and release,
encompassing emotional and cognitive aspects? Herein lies the deficiency—we lack understanding of the
psychospiritual mechanism of forgiveness itself, beyond mere religious rhetoric. Research on a new life post-
Umrah also tends to be anecdotal or limited qualitative studies. Many speak of changes in attitude, a desire to
become better individuals, abandoning immoral acts; these are all encouraging personal testimonies (Rosyadi et
al., 2019). However, the sustainability of these changes is often questioned. Why are some pilgrims able to
maintain their spiritual momentum, while others revert to old habits shortly after returning? This matter is rarely
seriously dissected. The lack of a solid theoretical framework to explain the factors influencing the sustainability
of this transformation—whether social support, environment, or strength of intention—is an impediment. While
Norhaslinda et al. (2023) attempt to link pilgrim satisfaction with the Umrah experience, it does not directly
address the sustainability of behavioral change. This indicates that although there is recognition of Umrah's
transformative potential, the mechanisms and determining factors of successful change remain obscure. Thus,
this literature review uncovers a gap in understanding how motivation, forgiveness, and opportunities for a new
life dynamically interact to form a holistic and lasting Umrah experience, beyond existing superficial
perceptions.
METHODOLOGY
This paper does not rely on empirical data collection; no questionnaires were distributed, and no interviews were
conducted. Instead, the methodological approach applied is conceptual analysis—an intensive process of
filtering, synthesizing, and reorganizing ideas from various literature sources. We are of the view that to
understand the depth of Umrah's spiritual transformation, we cannot merely rely on external observations or
brief reports, but must delve into existing narratives, theories, and debates within the disciplines of social
sciences, theology, and psychology of religion. This is not merely a standard literature review; it is the
construction of a new conceptual framework, an effort to deconstruct commonly accepted premises and
reconstruct a richer understanding. The process began with a careful source identification phase. We
systematically identified relevant academic journal articles, books, book chapters, and conference proceedings,
using major databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Keywords such as “Umrah”, “Hajj”,
“religious motivation”, “spiritual transformation”, “forgiveness in Islam”, “religious experience”, and “post-
worship behavioral change” were used in various combinations to ensure broad coverage. The selected sources
were not merely collected; they were filtered based on relevance, methodological quality (even if previous
studies were empirical, we evaluated the strength of their conceptual arguments), and their capacity to contribute
to a larger synthesis. We set aside works that offered only superficial descriptions or were trapped in theological
debates irrelevant to the psychological and sociological dimensions. This was a process demanding intellectual
acuity, not automatic data collection. The second phase was thematic content analysis. Each selected source was
read repeatedly, focusing on main arguments, concepts presented, and relationships between various ideas.
Emerging themes—such as the multi-layered motivations of Umrah, the psychospiritual mechanisms of
forgiveness, and factors influencing the sustainability of a new life—were noted and coded. We did not merely
take content literally, but also read between the lines, searching for implicit implications and gaps not filled by
previous studies. This required the ability to think critically and integrate diverse perspectives. The third phase
involved synthesis and conceptual framework development. The coded thematic data was then reorganized to
form a coherent narrative. This is where the main value of this methodology lies—the ability to connect disparate
points in the literature, creating a framework that explains how motivation, the process of forgiveness, and the
potential for a new life are interconnected. We formulated new arguments that went beyond the findings of
individual studies, integrating them into a more comprehensive conceptual model of Umrah as a transformative