transgender individuals. Existing approaches still show significant gaps in terms of understanding reality,
methodological accuracy, and implementation effectiveness.
The issue of transgender individuals cannot be viewed superficially based solely on Sharia law and da ‘wah
(Faridah et al., 2023). This is because the transgender issue is a complex psychosocial phenomenon involving
the interaction of biological factors, developmental experiences, trauma, family context, social structure, and
an individual's religious understanding. Without an integrated approach that combines Islamic epistemology
with modern social sciences, rehabilitation efforts often fail to yield consistent and sustainable results.
The majority of approaches used by religious institutions are regulatory and morally prescriptive, whereas
internal dimensions such as gender identity disorder, psychological stress, depression, or history of abuse are
not addressed scientifically and structurally (Darmansjah et al., 2019). Da ‘wah modules tend to emphasize
rehabilitation alone without understanding the underlying factors contributing to transgender identity.
Consequently, transgender individuals often find it difficult to connect religious rulings with their experiences.
This results in rehabilitation not addressing the root causes of transgender issues. This gap in approach also
leads to negative effects such as rejection, extreme guilt, or withdrawal from mosque communities and
religious institutions.
Furthermore, there is an absence of specific assessment instruments for Muslim transgender individuals
developed based on the framework of maqasid al-shariah, Islamic psychology and psychosocial constructs
within Malaysian Muslim society. Western measurement tools such as Gender Dysphoria Scales, Quality of
Life Indexes, or various psychological well-being inventories do not consider elements of ‘aqidah, relationship
with ibadah, motivation for tawbah, adab values, or the meaning of self as a servant of Allah. This
epistemological void causes interventions to fail in accurately measuring spiritual and social changes. Without
a suitable psychosocial index, rehabilitation programs become difficult to evaluate in terms of long-term
outcomes and cannot be developed as a national policy model.
The intervention approaches of Islamic institutions are also found to be inconsistent. These approaches depend
on resource capacity, da ‘wah orientation, staff background, and state legal requirements. For instance,
JAKIM's counseling modules differ from the approaches of State Islamic Religious Councils, while Islamic
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) use various motivational modules. The absence of a standardized
model leads to inconsistencies in the provision of religious information, rehabilitation techniques, and
psychological approaches. In the context of sensitive issues like transgenderism, this inconsistency not only
reduces the effectiveness of interventions but also creates confusion and distrust among rehabilitation
participants.
Furthermore, the implemented interventions still lack the application of an Islamic social ecological
perspective. Many programs focus solely on individual change, whereas social transition and long-term
rehabilitation heavily depend on family support, peer groups, mosque communities, and emotional support
networks. Family-based Islamic counselling approaches have not yet been systematically developed in the
transgender context, nor have community-based interventions to reduce social stigma. Without inclusive
ecosystem support, transgender individuals who have undergone rehabilitation modules often experience
relapse due to social pressure, family rejection, or economic difficulties.
Next, there is an epistemological divergence between legal and psychological approaches that has yet to be
reconciled. Some religious institutions insufficiently involve Islamic psychiatrists, Muslim therapists, and
psychological researchers in formulating rehabilitation modules. Conversely, some mental health professionals
lack understanding of the nuances of Islamic law related to gender identity. The failure to integrate these two
domains of knowledge creates a critical gap, as rehabilitation in Islam demands a combination of Sharia
understanding, ‘ilm al-nafsaniyyah, and contemporary psychological interventions.
Finally, existing approaches still pay insufficient attention to long-term empowerment aspects such as life
skills, career development, economic stability, and strengthening family relationships. Transgender individuals
are often in vulnerable positions regarding employment and social support. However, the majority of
rehabilitation programs focus solely on spiritual aspects, without providing a comprehensive empowerment