
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
www.rsisinternational.org
failure. We need to be more aggressive in seeking solutions. The lack of in-depth and structured analysis of 'Al-
Hikmah' in the context of education has left a significant gap in academic literature, hindering the development
of a more principled pedagogical model. This study attempts to fill this void, delving into the fundamental
concepts of Al-Hikmah to formulate a relevant theoretical framework for education in these increasingly
confused times.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The discourse on Islamic philosophy of education has never ceased, yet the depth of discussion sometimes feels
superficial, often straying into debates about form rather than essence. Many scholars, such as Al-Attas (1979)
and Nasr (1976), have long emphasized the necessity of integrating revealed knowledge and intellect, viewing
education not merely as a process of acquiring information—a process now increasingly accessible—but as the
formation of the soul. This perspective, which places adab (manners/discipline) and akhlaq (morality) at the
pinnacle of the hierarchy of knowledge, contrasts with Western approaches that tend to separate knowledge and
values, creating increasingly complex ethical dilemmas in science and technology. Al-Attas, for instance,
through his renowned work, argues that the ultimate goal of Islamic education is to produce an adab-infused
human being, an individual who recognizes their place in the order of existence, aware of their responsibilities
towards God, self, and society. However, interpretations of these views often stop at the rhetorical level, failing
to be translated into operational pedagogical frameworks. Studies such as Hasyim (2010), which attempt to
examine the contributions of classical figures like Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali, although valuable, sometimes get
trapped in purely descriptive narratives, offering less critical analysis of how these ideas can be pragmatically
applied in a postmodern educational context. This is a major problem. The paradigm of 'Al-Hikmah' itself,
meaning wisdom, is often mentioned in the context of philosophy in general but rarely specifically articulated
in educational theory, particularly how it can become the backbone of curriculum or teaching methodology. A
small number of scholars like Sazelin (2017) have attempted to link Al-Hikmah with moral education, but its
scope remains limited, not encompassing the broader epistemological, ontological, and axiological aspects
contained within the concept. Furthermore, there is a tendency to view Islamic education as a monolithic entity,
ignoring the diversity of thought and interpretation throughout history—this is a dangerous simplification.
Orientalists, and ironically, some Muslim scholars themselves, often fail to appreciate the intellectual dynamism
within the Islamic tradition, causing discussions about the philosophy of Al-Hikmah education to be trapped in
stereotypes or biased interpretations. A significant challenge is how to combine the Al-Hikmah framework,
rooted in metaphysical tradition, with the needs of the contemporary world that demands critical thinking,
creativity, and problem-solving abilities—something often misunderstood as contradictory. Mohd. Kamal
Hassan (2014) has endeavored to unite these two dimensions, proposing a harmonious integration between
religious knowledge and modern knowledge, but the 'Al-Hikmah' framework as a philosophical basis still needs
further clarification. The history of Islamic civilization itself is replete with examples of Al-Hikmah-oriented
educational institutions, such as the House of Wisdom (Baitul Hikmah) in Baghdad or centers of learning in
Andalusia, which were not only centers of translation and research but also of the personal development of
scholars. Unfortunately, modern studies rarely delve deeply into how this 'spirit' of Al-Hikmah was applied in
daily pedagogy, how teachers at that time instilled wisdom in their students—not just knowledge. What specific
techniques were used? How were these values naturally absorbed? These are important questions that require
more serious research, going beyond merely admiring past greatness. Clearly, there is an urgent need to formulate
an Al-Hikmah framework that is not only descriptive—telling what has happened—but also prescriptive, i.e.,
how it can be revived as the backbone of a more relevant and morally and intellectually competitive education
system. Views such as those by Freire (1970), albeit from a different context, emphasize education as a tool for
liberation and enlightenment, which can be said to align with the essence of Al-Hikmah that views knowledge
as a path to freedom from ignorance. However, Freire is more oriented towards socio-political liberation, while
Al-Hikmah touches deeper ontological and spiritual dimensions—viewing knowledge as a tool to understand
the reality of self and God. These similarities and differences are rarely studied comparatively, causing the
potential synergy between these approaches to be overlooked. Similarly, the debate about integrated curriculum,
which has been a hot discourse in Islamic education for several decades (Misbach, 2020), often fails to formulate
a solid philosophical basis; the unification of subjects does not guarantee the unification of the soul without the
guiding philosophy of 'Al-Hikmah'. This requires more than just curriculum planning. Thus, while many papers
have touched on different aspects of Islamic educational philosophy, a structured analysis specifically focusing
on the concept of Al-Hikmah as a coherent theoretical framework is still lacking—a gap this study hopes to fill.