INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
Page 579
www.rsisinternational.org
The Concept and Theory of Al-Hikmah Education: A Structured
Literature Review
Nor Salimah Abu Mansor
1*
, Nursyahirah Wahidah Masrom
2
, Mohd Nothman Mohamad Nor
3
, Mohd
Azuan Sulaiman
4
, Nur Zahirah Mohd Shukri
5
, Abdul Muqsith Ahmad
6
1
Faculty of Islamic Contemporary Studies (FKI), Sultan Zainal Abidin University
2,3,4
Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti of Selangor
Bestari Jaya Campus
5
Department Of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti of
Selangor Bestari Jaya Campus
6
Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Sultan Idris Education University
*
Corresponding Author
DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.930000075
Received: 10 December 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025; Published: 27 December 2025
ABSTRACT
Contemporary education is often trapped in a framework of superficial pragmatism, neglecting spiritual and
ethical dimensions—this leads to a significant crisis of values in global society. The failure of existing
educational systems to cultivate individuals with integrity and foresight is strikingly evident, triggering an
alarming moral deficit. Ironically, studies on the concept of 'Al-Hikmah' as a philosophical foundation for
education, although mentioned in some discourses, are rarely analyzed in a structured manner to delineate its
comprehensive theoretical framework. This study involves a critical conceptual analysis of relevant classical and
modern literature, examining key arguments and their methodological implications. Three main themes emerge:
first, Al-Hikmah demands the integration of revealed knowledge and intellect; second, this education centers on
the formation of ethical individuals through exemplary conduct; and third, it emphasizes the attainment of
wisdom through deep reflection, not merely the memorization of facts. This framework offers an alternative
paradigm that may guide educational reform towards the construction of a more meaningful civilization.
Keywords: Al-Hikmah, Islamic Philosophy of Education, Epistemology, Values Education, Human
Development
INTRODUCTION
The modern education system, with all its sophistication, seems to be increasingly distant from its original
purpose. Questions about the meaning and purpose of knowledge—whether it is merely a tool to achieve material
success or a path to a deeper understanding of existence—continue to haunt educators and thinkers. In reality,
we observe graduates who are academically excellent but often deficient in human, social, and ethical aspects,
indicating a serious imbalance in current pedagogical goals. This failure may well be rooted in a fragile
philosophical foundation—a void rarely openly acknowledged. A paradigm that overly emphasizes quantitative
measurement and market competition has, perhaps, diminished the very meaning of 'education', hindering the
true potential of individuals to develop holistically. Criticism of utilitarian approaches in education is not new;
thinkers from various backgrounds have long pointed fingers at a system that seems only to want to produce
'skilled workers' rather than 'wise citizens'. However, we rarely see serious efforts to seek and apply a
philosophical framework truly rooted in the tradition of wisdom—a tradition capable of uniting intellect and
heart, the worldly and the otherworldly. Why does the discourse of 'Al-Hikmah', rich with such potential, remain
marginalized or merely mentioned in passing in discussions of educational reform? It is a surprising collective
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
Page 580
www.rsisinternational.org
failure. We need to be more aggressive in seeking solutions. The lack of in-depth and structured analysis of 'Al-
Hikmah' in the context of education has left a significant gap in academic literature, hindering the development
of a more principled pedagogical model. This study attempts to fill this void, delving into the fundamental
concepts of Al-Hikmah to formulate a relevant theoretical framework for education in these increasingly
confused times.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The discourse on Islamic philosophy of education has never ceased, yet the depth of discussion sometimes feels
superficial, often straying into debates about form rather than essence. Many scholars, such as Al-Attas (1979)
and Nasr (1976), have long emphasized the necessity of integrating revealed knowledge and intellect, viewing
education not merely as a process of acquiring information—a process now increasingly accessible—but as the
formation of the soul. This perspective, which places adab (manners/discipline) and akhlaq (morality) at the
pinnacle of the hierarchy of knowledge, contrasts with Western approaches that tend to separate knowledge and
values, creating increasingly complex ethical dilemmas in science and technology. Al-Attas, for instance,
through his renowned work, argues that the ultimate goal of Islamic education is to produce an adab-infused
human being, an individual who recognizes their place in the order of existence, aware of their responsibilities
towards God, self, and society. However, interpretations of these views often stop at the rhetorical level, failing
to be translated into operational pedagogical frameworks. Studies such as Hasyim (2010), which attempt to
examine the contributions of classical figures like Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali, although valuable, sometimes get
trapped in purely descriptive narratives, offering less critical analysis of how these ideas can be pragmatically
applied in a postmodern educational context. This is a major problem. The paradigm of 'Al-Hikmah' itself,
meaning wisdom, is often mentioned in the context of philosophy in general but rarely specifically articulated
in educational theory, particularly how it can become the backbone of curriculum or teaching methodology. A
small number of scholars like Sazelin (2017) have attempted to link Al-Hikmah with moral education, but its
scope remains limited, not encompassing the broader epistemological, ontological, and axiological aspects
contained within the concept. Furthermore, there is a tendency to view Islamic education as a monolithic entity,
ignoring the diversity of thought and interpretation throughout history—this is a dangerous simplification.
Orientalists, and ironically, some Muslim scholars themselves, often fail to appreciate the intellectual dynamism
within the Islamic tradition, causing discussions about the philosophy of Al-Hikmah education to be trapped in
stereotypes or biased interpretations. A significant challenge is how to combine the Al-Hikmah framework,
rooted in metaphysical tradition, with the needs of the contemporary world that demands critical thinking,
creativity, and problem-solving abilities—something often misunderstood as contradictory. Mohd. Kamal
Hassan (2014) has endeavored to unite these two dimensions, proposing a harmonious integration between
religious knowledge and modern knowledge, but the 'Al-Hikmah' framework as a philosophical basis still needs
further clarification. The history of Islamic civilization itself is replete with examples of Al-Hikmah-oriented
educational institutions, such as the House of Wisdom (Baitul Hikmah) in Baghdad or centers of learning in
Andalusia, which were not only centers of translation and research but also of the personal development of
scholars. Unfortunately, modern studies rarely delve deeply into how this 'spirit' of Al-Hikmah was applied in
daily pedagogy, how teachers at that time instilled wisdom in their students—not just knowledge. What specific
techniques were used? How were these values naturally absorbed? These are important questions that require
more serious research, going beyond merely admiring past greatness. Clearly, there is an urgent need to formulate
an Al-Hikmah framework that is not only descriptive—telling what has happened—but also prescriptive, i.e.,
how it can be revived as the backbone of a more relevant and morally and intellectually competitive education
system. Views such as those by Freire (1970), albeit from a different context, emphasize education as a tool for
liberation and enlightenment, which can be said to align with the essence of Al-Hikmah that views knowledge
as a path to freedom from ignorance. However, Freire is more oriented towards socio-political liberation, while
Al-Hikmah touches deeper ontological and spiritual dimensions—viewing knowledge as a tool to understand
the reality of self and God. These similarities and differences are rarely studied comparatively, causing the
potential synergy between these approaches to be overlooked. Similarly, the debate about integrated curriculum,
which has been a hot discourse in Islamic education for several decades (Misbach, 2020), often fails to formulate
a solid philosophical basis; the unification of subjects does not guarantee the unification of the soul without the
guiding philosophy of 'Al-Hikmah'. This requires more than just curriculum planning. Thus, while many papers
have touched on different aspects of Islamic educational philosophy, a structured analysis specifically focusing
on the concept of Al-Hikmah as a coherent theoretical framework is still lacking—a gap this study hopes to fill.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
Page 581
www.rsisinternational.org
METHODOLOGY
This study is a pure conceptual research, based on critical document and literature analysis—not a random study.
We did not conduct field surveys, no interviews, and no focus groups, as its primary purpose is to construct a
theoretical framework. This approach was carefully chosen, not for convenience, but because it is most suitable
for the purpose of excavating, synthesizing, and restructuring complex philosophical ideas widely dispersed in
the corpus of knowledge. To understand 'Al-Hikmah' as an educational concept, one needs to delve deep into
classical and modern texts, examining not only literal definitions but also its metaphysical and epistemological
implications. This demands patience and intellectual acumen. Our analysis process began with the identification
and collection of key literature discussing Islamic philosophy of education, wisdom in the Islamic context,
Islamic epistemology, and studies on 'Al-Hikmah' itself. These sources included books, peer-reviewed journal
articles, doctoral theses, and classical works from prominent Muslim scholars. We did not merely collect; each
source was filtered, its argumentative quality assessed, and its relevance to the formation of the Al-Hikmah
educational theoretical framework examined. We consciously set aside texts that were apologetic or less critical,
choosing to focus on works that demonstrated depth of philosophical analysis and rigor of argument. This
approach ensured that only intellectually robust materials would be used. The next step involved deep and
repeated reading of the selected literature. Each text was broken down into its conceptual elements, such as the
definition of Al-Hikmah, its sources, the educational goals it supports, the roles of teachers and students, and
proposed teaching methodologies. We looked for common threads, recurring themes, and also contradictions
because contradictions themselves often reveal the richness of interpretation. The goal was not merely to
summarize what each author said; it was to construct a coherent and comprehensive narrative from the fragments
of information available. The thematic analysis was conducted manually, not using software, because this process
demands intuitive understanding and subjective interpretation that can only be performed by a trained human
mind. After identifying the main themes, we moved to the synthesis process. This was the most challenging
phase—connecting disparate points, reformulating complex ideas into clear and concise propositions. The
construction of the Al-Hikmah theoretical framework as an educational model involved an inductive process,
where from specific details drawn from various sources, we attempted to encapsulate the general principles that
form the basis of this educational philosophy. This process also involved a critical assessment of the robustness
and internal consistency of each theme, ensuring they were complementary and not contradictory. We constantly
asked: does this truly reflect the essence of Al-Hikmah, or is it merely a superficial interpretation? Finally, the
constructed theoretical framework was conceptually tested—not with empirical data, but by evaluating its ability
to explain existing educational phenomena and offer prescriptive guidance for reform. We examined whether
this framework could answer fundamental questions about the purpose of education, curriculum content, and
pedagogical approaches from the perspective of Al-Hikmah. This methodology, although document-based,
demands a high level of critical thinking, rejecting simplistic notions and instead encouraging in-depth
research—a form of intellectual 'archaeology' essential for producing meaningful theoretical contributions. Thus,
this study is absolutely an interpretive and constructive endeavor, building upon what already exists, but with a
fresh perspective and a new synthesis.
FINDINGS
This conceptual study reveals several important aspects of the Al-Hikmah philosophy of education, which are
often overlooked in contemporary educational discourse. This is not just an old theory. It is a profound system
of thought. Wisdom, or Al-Hikmah, is not merely synonymous with cleverness or intelligence; it transcends that,
encompassing an understanding of the true nature of things, the ability to make sound decisions, and a high
spiritual awareness. First, the Al-Hikmah educational framework demands an absolute integration between
revealed knowledge and intellectual knowledge—not just combining two syllabi. Attempts to separate religious
knowledge and worldly knowledge are the main cause of confusion and the crisis of values in modern education
systems. Al-Hikmah asserts that both sources of knowledge—revelation as divine guidance, and intellect as a
tool to understand the universe—must move in tandem, indeed mutually reinforcing each other. Students need
to realize that science is not just about exploring the physical world, but also about uncovering signs of God's
greatness; this drastically changes perspective. This separation, a hallmark of secular education, has produced
individuals who are intelligent in one field but blind to the ethical or spiritual implications of their discoveries.
So, Al-Hikmah education is about building bridges, not gaps. Second, Al-Hikmah education is deeply centered
on the formation of ethical individuals through exemplary conduct—this is its core essence. An Al-Hikmah
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
Page 582
www.rsisinternational.org
teacher is not merely a conveyor of facts or a learning facilitator; they are a living model, a murabbi
(educator/mentor) whose soul has been shaped by wisdom. Al-Hikmah teaching methods do not solely rely on
lectures or exercises, but more on personal interaction, moral guidance, and exposure to character-forming
experiences. Students are taught to internalize values such as justice, patience, honesty, and humility—not just
to memorize their definitions. This is a slow process and requires high commitment. An Al-Hikmah school might
look very different from our current conventional schools, with an emphasis on the moral character of teachers
and an environment conducive to moral reflection. Third, Al-Hikmah emphasizes the attainment of wisdom
through deep reflection, not merely boring memorization of facts. An Al-Hikmah curriculum would encourage
critical thinking, in-depth analysis, and the ability to see connections between various fields of knowledge—not
just swallowing information. Students are trained to ask "why" and "how" at every stage of learning, prompting
them to seek meaning behind every fact. This goes beyond the short-term memory often measured by standard
examinations. Assessment in Al-Hikmah education might be more qualitative, evaluating students' ability to
think synthetically, make ethical judgments, and apply knowledge in real-life contexts. Therefore, it requires a
complete change in how we define educational success. Fourth, Al-Hikmah education fosters a sense of social
and cosmological responsibility—a dimension missing in many systems. Knowledge acquired is not for self-
interest alone; it is a trust. Students are taught to use their wisdom for the good of the community, to protect the
environment, and to contribute to universal harmony. This shapes individuals who are aware of their role as
stewards (khalifah) on earth, not just consumers of resources. This is a different worldview. Al-Hikmah
education, therefore, rejects the extreme individualism often associated with Western education systems and
instead emphasizes the interconnectivity of all beings. Finally, it was found that Al-Hikmah outlines a process
of lifelong learning—knowledge is not just for school benches or universities. Wisdom is a continuous quest,
evolving with experience and reflection. This means education does not end with a degree; it is an ongoing
journey to better understand oneself, the world, and God. This implication requires educational institutions to
provide a support framework for continuous learning, as well as to instill an ethos of thirst for knowledge in
every individual.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study, which outline the principles of Al-Hikmah education, raise profound questions about
the direction of our education system today—what exactly are we achieving? Clearly, the gap between the noble
goals of education and the reality of its implementation is widening. The emphasis on the integration of revealed
knowledge and intellect, for example, is not just academic rhetoric; it is a prerequisite for building a balanced
civilization. The failure to unite these two domains has created an epistemological confusion, where science is
considered value-neutral and religion is marginalized as a private matter, irrelevant to worldly progress. This is
a dangerous way of thinking. Consequently, most graduates today, although perhaps technically proficient,
struggle with identity crises and complex ethical dilemmas, because they lack a comprehensive framework to
understand their place in the larger scheme of existence. The implications of the findings regarding the exemplary
role of teachers in Al-Hikmah education are also very significant. We live in an era where the teaching profession
is increasingly dominated by bureaucratic pressures, an emphasis on test results, and a decline in professional
status—this is very disheartening. How can a teacher, trapped in a system overly focused on numbers, become
a murabbi (mentor) who guides the soul, as demanded by the Al-Hikmah philosophy? It is a dilemma that
requires a radical paradigm shift, not just additional pedagogical training. The system needs to re-value the moral
and spiritual qualities of an educator, not just their academic qualifications. Perhaps, universities that train
teachers need to reform their curricula, incorporating modules that seriously emphasize character building and
the ethics of knowledge—not just superficial courses. Otherwise, the idea of teachers as role models will remain
an empty dream, far from the reality of the classroom. The emphasis on deep reflection rather than memorization
of facts also challenges the hegemony of standardized test-based assessment systems that dominate global
education. Are we truly measuring wisdom or just short-term memorization ability? This is a serious question.
The current system, which rewards the ability to regurgitate information, indirectly kills critical thinking and
creativity, two essential elements in the pursuit of wisdom. Al-Hikmah education would demand a more holistic
assessment, perhaps through portfolios, real-world problem-based projects, and philosophical debates, which
encourage students to think independently and make mature judgments. This requires courage to leave the
comfort zone of quantitative assessment. Of course, there are practical objections regarding the scale of
implementation, but will we let practical constraints kill our highest pedagogical aspirations? Furthermore, the
concept of social and cosmological responsibility emerging from Al-Hikmah is a sharp critique of the extreme
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
Page 583
www.rsisinternational.org
individualism prevalent in contemporary society. We often view success as purely a personal achievement,
without considering its implications for the community or the environment. Al-Hikmah education strives to
instill the awareness that every individual is part of a larger whole, that acquired knowledge has social and ethical
dimensions that cannot be ignored—this is an important message. This means the curriculum needs to be
redesigned to include community-based learning, environmental projects, and deep ethical discussions, making
students more sensitive to their role as agents of change. This is more than just superficial "civic education."
However, there are also significant challenges in applying this Al-Hikmah framework. One is the risk of narrow
interpretation, where 'Al-Hikmah' is misunderstood as a form of religious dogmatism that rejects rational thought
or scientific progress—this is very inaccurate. Such an interpretation would betray the essence of Al-Hikmah
itself, which always emphasizes intellect and reflection. Therefore, any reform effort must be careful to ensure
that this Al-Hikmah approach is presented as an inclusive, open to dialogue, and progressive framework, not a
regressive one. It needs to be clarified as a philosophy that embraces knowledge from various sources, as long
as it leads to truth and goodness. Only with the correct interpretation can Al-Hikmah become a new 'landmark'
in our education. Finally, Al-Hikmah implies a process of lifelong learning. This is not a new idea, but its
implementation in practice is still weak. Society often views education as a specific phase in life, not as a
continuous journey. The practical implication is that educational institutions need to move beyond their
traditional role as 'degree providers' to 'community learning centers' that provide opportunities for continuous
self-development. This requires significant investment, a change in mentality, and a shift in focus from
certification to continuous personal growth. Without these changes, education will remain a fragmented process,
failing to cultivate truly wise and relevant individuals in facing life's challenges.
CONCLUSION
It is clear that the concept of Al-Hikmah offers more than just another educational theory; it is a profound
philosophy of life, capable of reshaping how we understand and implement the learning process. This research
has uncovered the essence of Al-Hikmah as a framework that demands the integration of revealed knowledge
and intellect, highlights the critical role of teachers as moral exemplars, and emphasizes the importance of deep
reflection over superficial memorization. It also stresses social responsibility and the process of lifelong learning.
All these elements, if truly applied, have the potential to resolve the crisis of values and epistemology currently
afflicting the global education system—this is a great hope. However, this potential will only be realized if we
are prepared to make a significant paradigm shift. This means moving beyond cosmetic curriculum reforms and
instead re-examining the philosophical foundations of our education. We can no longer be content with a system
that produces technically competent graduates but who are morally and spiritually impoverished. Society needs
individuals who are not only intelligent, but wise—individuals capable of making just decisions, possessing
foresight, and being responsible towards themselves, society, and the universe. This is not an easy task. It requires
political commitment, intellectual investment, and a willingness to confront the comfortable status quo. For
future research, it is highly recommended that empirical studies be conducted to test how these Al-Hikmah
educational principles can be practically translated into school or university curricula. For example, the
development of pilot modules focusing on the integration of knowledge and character building through Al-
Hikmah methodology, followed by an assessment of their impact on students—how it influences their
worldview, critical thinking skills, and moral development. This could be a long-term project. It is important not
just to talk about theory but to demonstrate evidence of its effectiveness in the field. Without concrete action,
Al-Hikmah will remain mere academic idealism, failing to truly transform our educational landscape. Ignoring
this wisdom could lead to a slow but certain collapse of civilization.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study is funded under the Siddiq Fadzil Institute of Thought and Leadership (IPKSF) with grant code I-
IPKSF/AL-HIKMAH/UNISEL2023/SS04 from the Centre for Research and Industry Linkages (CRIL),
Universiti Selangor (UNISEL), Malaysia. The researchers extend their heartfelt appreciation and gratitude to all
parties involved in this research, whether directly or indirectly.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XXX December 2025 | Special Issue
Page 584
www.rsisinternational.org
REFERENCES
1. Abidin, M. Z. (2023). Rethinking Islamic education: Integrating tradition and modernity through hikmah.
Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 12(2), 110-125.
2. Abdullah, M. H. (2022). Membina insan seimbang: Pendekatan al-hikmah dalam pedagogi. Tinta Ilmu.
3. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1979). Aims and objectives of Islamic education. Hodder and Stoughton.
4. Bakri, M. F. (2021). Epistemologi Islam dan aplikasinya dalam pendidikan kontemporari. Jurnal
Pendidikan Islam Malaysia, 5(1), 78-92.
5. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
6. Hashim, R. (2012). Educational wisdom of the East: A study of Islamic education tradition. IIUM Press.
7. Hasyim, I. (2010). Falsafah pendidikan Islam: Suatu kajian komparatif tokoh-tokoh klasik. Dewan
Bahasa dan Pustaka.
8. Misbach, M. (2020). Kurikulum bersepadu pendidikan Islam: Cabaran dan prospek. Jurnal Pengajian
Umum, 21(1), 1-18.
9. Mohd Kamal Hassan. (2014). The wisdom of al-Ghazali and al-Attas on Islamic education. Penerbit
Universiti Malaya.
10. Nasr, S. H. (1976). Islamic science: An illustrated study. World of Islam Festival Publishing Company.
11. Ramlee, S. (2020). Pembinaan karakter pelajar melalui pengajaran nilai al-hikmah: Kajian di sekolah
menengah. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Nasional.
12. Sazelin, A. (2017). Konsep al-hikmah dalam pembentukan akhlak pelajar: Analisis dari perspektif
pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 15(2), 45-60.
13. Yahaya, M. M. (2021). Krisis pendidikan moral di Malaysia: Perspektif falsafah al-hikmah. Jurnal
Pembangunan Sosial, 26(1), 1-15.
14. Zainuddin, H. A. (2019). Falsafah ilmu dalam pemikiran Islam. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan
Malaysia.