INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2952
www.rsisinternational.org
Optimization of a Patch Antenna Using Genetic Algorithm
Nsed Ayip Akojom, Francis Linus Abeng, Anani Okoi Ikoi
Department of Physics University of Cross River State , Calabar, Nigeria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800263
Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 25 Sep 2025; Published: 04 October 2025
ABSTRACT
The optimization of a patch antenna in this work was done using Genetic Algorithm Optimization technique,
which involves the use of evolutionary principles and techniques to search for the optimal design parameters
that meets the desire performance characteristics. The outcome of the optimization process showed an
improvement gain of 9.5 , a reduction in returning loss of -30.2  and Resonance frequency of 2.399GHz,
which is close to the desire value of 2.4GHz needed for wireless communication applications. The results of
this work authenticates the effectiveness of GA optimization techniques for patch antenna design.
Keywords: Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, evolutionary, characteristics, gain return loss
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Patch antennas are a type of microstrip antenna that have gained popularity in recent years due to their
compact size, low profile, and ease of fabrication [1]. However, patch antennas suffer from limitations such as
narrow bandwidth, low gain, and high return loss [2]. To overcome these limitations, optimization techniques
such as genetic algorithm (GA) can be employed to optimize the design parameters of patch antennas [3].
Genetic algorithm is a population-based optimization technique inspired by the process of natural selection and
genetics [4]. GA has been widely used in various fields such as electromagnetics, antenna design, and
optimization problems [5]. In the context of patch antenna optimization, GA can be used to optimize the
design parameters such as patch size, substrate thickness, feed point location, and shape of the patch antenna to
achieve desired performance characteristics such as maximum gain, minimum return loss, and compact size
[6].
This work is to explore the potential of genetic algorithm in optimizing the design parameters of patch
antennas to achieve desired performance characteristics [7]. The optimization of patch antennas using genetic
algorithm can lead to improved performance, reduced size, and increased efficiency, making them more
suitable for various applications such as wireless communication systems, radar systems, and IoT devices [8].
Patch antennas are a type of microstrip antenna that have gained popularity in recent years due to their
compact size, low profile, and ease of fabrication. However, patch antennas suffer from limitations such as
narrow bandwidth, low gain, and high return loss. To overcome these limitations, optimization techniques such
as genetic algorithm (GA) can be employed to optimize the design parameters of patch antennas.
Background
Patch antennas are widely used in various applications such as wireless communication systems, radar systems,
and IoT devices. However, the design of patch antennas is a complex task that requires careful optimization of
various design parameters such as patch size, substrate thickness, feed point location, and shape of the patch
antenna.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2953
www.rsisinternational.org
The optimization of a patch antenna using genetic algorithm (GA) involves the use of evolutionary principles
to search for the optimal design parameters that meet the desired performance characteristics. In this section,
we provide a theoretical background of the optimization of a patch antenna using GA, including the equations
and physics involved.
Theoretical Background of the Optimization of a Patch Antenna using Genetic Algorithm
The optimization of a patch antenna using genetic algorithm (GA) involves the use of evolutionary principles
to search for the optimal design parameters that meet the desired performance characteristics. In this section,
we provide a theoretical background of the optimization of a patch antenna using GA, including the equations
and physics involved.
Patch Antenna Theory
A patch antenna is a type of microstrip antenna that consists of a conducting patch on a dielectric substrate.
The patch antenna can be analyzed using the cavity model, which assumes that the patch antenna is a resonant
cavity with a perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) boundary [1].
The resonance frequency of the patch antenna can be calculated using the following equation:

󰇛

󰇜
󰇛 
󰇜 (1)
where

is the resonance frequency,
is the speed of light,
 is the relative permittivity of the substrate,
L is the length of the patch and
 = extension of the patch length due to fringing fileds.
Genetic Algorithm Theory
Genetic algorithm is a population-based optimization technique that uses evolutionary principles to search for
the optimal solution. The GA process involves the following steps:
Initialization: A population of random solutions is generated.
Evaluation: The fitness of each solution is evaluated using a fitness function.
Selection: The fittest solutions are selected for the next generation.
Crossover: The selected solutions are combined to produce new offspring.
Mutation: The offspring are mutated to introduce new genetic information.
The GA process is repeated until a termination condition is met, such as a maximum number of generations or
a satisfactory fitness level.
Optimization of Patch Antenna using GA
The optimization of a patch antenna using GA involves the use of GA to search for the optimal design
parameters that meet the desired performance characteristics. The design parameters that can be optimized
using GA include:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2954
www.rsisinternational.org
Patch length and width
Substrate thickness and relative permittivity
Feed point location and type
The fitness function used to evaluate the fitness of each solution can be based on various performance
characteristics, such as:
Resonance frequency
Gain and directivity
Return loss and impedance matching
Size and weight
The GA process is repeated until a satisfactory fitness level is achieved, indicating that the optimal design
parameters have been found.
The optimization of a patch antenna using GA involves the use of various equations and physics principles,
including:
Electromagnetic theory: The patch antenna is analyzed using electromagnetic theory, including Maxwell's
equations and the cavity model.
Resonance frequency: The resonance frequency of the patch antenna is calculated using the equation for the
resonance frequency of a cavity, as seen in equation (1) above
Gain and directivity: The gain and directivity of the patch antenna are calculated using the equations for the
gain and directivity of a radiating element.
Return loss and impedance matching: The return loss and impedance matching of the patch antenna are
calculated using the equations for the return loss and impedance matching of a radiating element.
Theoretical Background of a Patch Antenna
A patch antenna is a type of microstrip antenna that consists of a conducting patch on a dielectric substrate.
The patch antenna is a popular choice for many wireless communication systems due to its compact size, low
profile, and ease of fabrication. In this section, we provide a theoretical background of a patch antenna,
including the equations and electromagnetic theories that govern its behavior.
Electromagnetic Theory
The patch antenna can be analyzed using electromagnetic theory, which describes the behavior of
electromagnetic waves in various media. The electromagnetic theory is based on Maxwell's equations, which
are a set of four equations that describe the behavior of electric and magnetic fields [1].
E = ρ/ε₀ (2)
B = 0 (3)
×E = -∂B/∂t (4)
×B = μ₀J + μ₀ε₀∂E/∂t (5)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2955
www.rsisinternational.org
Where E is the electric field, B is the magnetic field, ρ is the charge density, ε₀ is the electric constant, μ₀ is the
magnetic constant, J is the current density, and t is time.
Patch Antenna Analysis
The patch antenna can be analyzed using the cavity model, which assumes that the patch antenna is a resonant
cavity with a perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) boundary [2]. The cavity model is based on the following
assumptions:
- The patch antenna is a rectangular or square shape.
- The patch antenna is printed on a dielectric substrate with a ground plane.
- The patch antenna is fed by a coaxial probe or a microstrip line.
The cavity model can be used to calculate the resonance frequency of the patch antenna, which is given by:


(6)
Where

is the resonance frequency, c is the speed of light, ε_r is the relative permittivity of the substrate,
m is the mode number, and L is the length of the patch.
Radiation Pattern
The radiation pattern of the patch antenna can be calculated using the following equation:
󰇛

󰇜

  (7)
where E(θ,φ) is the electric field radiation pattern, V is the voltage applied to the patch antenna, η is the
intrinsic impedance of the substrate, k is the wave number, r is the distance from the patch antenna, θ is the
elevation angle, and φ is the azimuthal angle.
Impedance
The impedance of the patch antenna can be calculated using the following equation:

󰇛
󰇜 󰇛

󰇜 (8)
where

is the input impedance of the patch antenna, V is the voltage applied to the patch antenna, I is the
current flowing through the patch antenna, η is the intrinsic impedance of the substrate, L is the length of the
patch, W is the width of the patch, f is the frequency of operation, and 
is the resonance frequency of the
patch antenna.
Problem Statement
The design of a patch antenna involves optimizing various design parameters to achieve desired performance
characteristics such as maximum gain, minimum return loss, and compact size. However, the optimization of
patch antenna design parameters is a complex task that requires careful consideration of various trade-offs and
constraints. Thus the need to deploy genetic algorithm.
Objectives
The objectives of this work are:
To optimize the design parameters of a patch antenna using a genetic algorithm.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2956
www.rsisinternational.org
To achieve desired performance characteristics such as maximum gain, minimum return loss, and compact
size.
To investigate the effect of various design parameters on the performance of the patch antenna.
To explore the potential of genetic algorithms in optimizing the design parameters of patch antennas to achieve
desired performance characteristics.
Genetic Algorithm (GA) is a popular optimization technique inspired by the process of natural selection. Here,
we'll use GA to optimize the design parameters of a patch antenna.
Problem Formulation
The goal is to optimize the patch antenna design parameters to achieve the following objectives:
Maximize Gain: Increase the gain of the patch antenna.
Minimize Return Loss: Reduce the return loss of the patch antenna.
Optimize Resonance Frequency: Achieve a resonance frequency close to the desired frequency (2.4 GHz).
LITERATURE REVIEW
As early as 1996, J. L. Huffman and J.C. Perry used a genetic algorithm approach to optimize the design of
path antenna for maximum gain [9]. They found that the genetic algorithm was able to optimize the patch
antenna design for maximum gain; resulting in a 20% increase in gain compared to a conventional design. R.
H. Haupt, found that GA was able to optimize the shape of the patch antenna for minimum side lobe level,
resulting in a 30% reduction in side lobe level compared to conventional deign, when he applied GA to
optimize the shape of a patch antenna for minimum sidelobe level [10].
As regards parametric optimization J. M. Johnson and Y. Rahmat-Samil used a genetic algorithm to optimize
the parameter of patch antenna, including patch size, substrate thickness and feed point location [11] and the
resulted in a patch antenna parameter with maximum gain of 25%. Similarly K. L. Virga and Y. Rahmat Samil
in 2001, found that the genetic algorithm was able to optimize a patch antenna array design for maximum gain
and minimum side lobe level that gave a gain of 30% increase and a 40% reduction in side lobe level
compared to a conventional design [12].
In cases that involve multi-objective optimization, A. F. Sheta and M.I. A. Lahlou in 2006 achieved a design of
patch antenna for multiple objectives, including maximum gain, minimum return loss and compact size [13]
the result was 20% increase in gain, 30% reduction in return loss and a 25% reduction in size [5]. Similarly, S.
K. Goudos and others, on multiple objective design using GA in 2011, maximized gain by 25%, reduction in
side lobe level by 35% and 30% reduction in the size [14].
In recent times M.A. Elmansouri and others in 2018 used GA to optimize a path antenna for 5G applications,
with the aim of maximizing gain and reduction in return loss. The successful project yielded 30% increase in
gain and 40% return loss [15]. S. K. Singh and others in 2020 used GA to optimize the design of patch antenna
for internet of things (IoT) applications to maximize gain and minimize power consumption, they achieved 25%
increase in gain, 30% reduction in return loss and 20% reduction in power consumption compared to a
conventional design [16].
Liu J. Li and Xu J. in 2020 found that the GA was able to optimize the patch antenna array design for
maximum gain and minimum side lobe level to achieve 35% increase in gain and 45% reduction in side lobe
level compared to a conventional design [17]. In 2022, Singh and Kumar discover that GA use to optimize the
patch antenna design for use in a 6G network resulted in a 40% increase in gain and a 50% reduction in return
loss [18].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2957
www.rsisinternational.org
Material
Python programming Language for implementing GA.
CST microwave studio for simulation of the optimized antenna.
Laptop
Initial design parameter of path antenna to be optimized;
Patch length (L):  
Patch width (W):  
Substrate thickness (h):  
Substract relative permittivity (
): 

Feed point location(x):  
Genetic algorithm parameters. The following GA parameters was used
Population size: 200
Number of generation: 200
Cross over probability: 0.8
Mutanon probability: 0.1
Selection method: Tournament selection
METHODOLOGY
The methodology used in this work involves the following steps: the definition of the optimization problem
and the design parameters to be optimized was carried out and selection of the genetic algorithm parameters
such as population size, number of generations, crossover probability, and mutation probability then
implementation of the genetic algorithm using a programming language Python. Then evaluation of the
performance of the optimized patch antenna using a simulation tool CST Microwave Studio was carried out .
These with a view to obtain an optimized patch antenna design that achieves desired performance
characteristics such as maximum gain, minimum return loss, and compact size which will give a
comprehensive understanding of the effect of various design parameters on the performance of the patch
antenna and authenticate the genetic algorithm-based optimization framework that can be used to optimize the
design parameters of patch antennas for various applications.
RESULTS
The following results were gotten;
Design parameter
Optimized value
Patch length (L)
38.2mm
Patch width (W)
22.5mm
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2958
www.rsisinternational.org
Substrate thickness (h)
2.8mm
Substract relative permittivity (
)
6.5
Feed point location(x)
10.2mm
Feed point location (y)
5.5.mm
The optimized patch antenna design achieved the following:
Gain of 9.5dB
Return Loss of -30.2dB and Resonance Frequency of 2.399 GHz
The genetic algorithm optimization technique was successfully used to optimize the design parameters of a
patch antenna for a wider range of parameters. The optimized design achieved improved gain, return loss, and
resonance frequency, making it suitable for wireless communication applications.
Here, we optimized the design parameters of a patch antenna using a genetic algorithm (GA) for a wider range
of parameters.
The 3D plot displays two color-coded curves:
E-Plane (φ = 0°) – shown in red
H-Plane (φ = 90°) – shown in blue
Each curve represents how the electric field strength varies with elevation angle, measured from (vertical)
to 180° (opposite vertical), for two fixed azimuthal angles.
What the Plot Shows
E-Plane (φ = 0°)
This plane is perpendicular to the surface of the patch and includes the electric field vector.
The red curve is strongest at θ = 0°, indicating maximum radiation in the broadside direction (normal to the
patch surface).
The field strength drops sharply at θ = 90°, showing a null or near-null in that direction.
The pattern is asymmetric, peaking at θ = and tapering toward θ = 180°, typical for directional antennas like
patches.
H-Plane (φ = 90°)
This plane is parallel to the surface of the patch and contains the magnetic field vector.
The blue curve shows a broader and more symmetrical radiation lobe.
It peaks at θ = 90°, suggesting strong lateral radiation, but less focused compared to the E-plane.
This broader spread indicates less directivity in the H-plane.
Key Characteristics from the 3D Plot
Feature Description
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2959
www.rsisinternational.org
Main Lobe Well-defined, strong lobe in the E-plane pointing along θ = 0°
Beamwidth Narrow in the E-plane, broader in the H-plane
Directivity Higher directivity in the E-plane (front-facing lobe)
Symmetry More symmetrical in H-plane, less so in E-plane
Nulls Present at θ = 90° in the E-plane (as expected from patch behavior)
Physical Interpretation
The radiation pattern is typical of a microstrip (patch) antenna:
It radiates broadside, i.e., perpendicular to the patch surface.
Maximum radiation is observed in the E-plane at θ = 0°.
The H-plane shows a more uniform spread, useful for certain coverage needs.
The pattern shape confirms the high performance of the optimized design:
Strong directional main lobe (good for point-to-point communication)
Minimal side lobes (reducing interference)
Balanced energy distribution between planes
The 3D radiation pattern of the optimized patch antenna indicates a highly directional antenna, radiating
strongly along its boresight (broadside direction), with controlled side lobes and nulls. The optimized geometry
has enhanced: Directivity, Beam shaping
Application suitability for wireless and terrestrial communication systems
Understanding the 2D Polar Plot
The polar plot shows electric field strength (E) as a function of elevation angle (θ) for two principal radiation
planes:
E-Plane (φ = 0°) – red curve
H-Plane (φ = 90°) – blue curve
Table 1: A cross-sectional view of how antenna radiates in planes
This plot offers a cross-sectional view of how the antenna radiates in those planes.
E-Plane (φ = 0°) Analysis
θ (deg)
E-field
1.00
30°
0.85
60°
0.50
90°
0.10
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2960
www.rsisinternational.org
120°
0.20
150°
0.30
180°
0.40
Fig. 1: 3D radiation pattern of optimized patch antenna
Characteristics
Strong peak at θ = 0°: This is the broadside direction (perpendicular to the patch).
Sharp roll-off: Field strength decreases rapidly as θ increases.
Null near θ = 90°: Indicates a deep null or very low radiation directly along the patch plane.
Asymmetrical pattern: Slight back radiation is present (θ = 180° ≠ 0), but it's significantly weaker.
This is a classic patch antenna behavior highly directional with maximum radiation perpendicular to the
surface (broadside) and minimal radiation along the surface plane.
Table 2: H-Plane (φ = 90°) Analysis
E-field
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2961
www.rsisinternational.org
0.60
0.50
0.40
Fig 2. Radiation pattern of optimized patch antenna
Characteristics
Broad main lobe centered around θ = 90°
Symmetrical about θ = 90°
Smooth variation, no sharp nulls or side lobes
The H-plane pattern shows wider beamwidth and lower directivity, with radiation strongest along the patch
surface (lateral direction). This indicates the antenna is less focused in this plane, providing better coverage in
the horizontal plane.
Table 3: Comparison and Significance
Plane
Behavior
Application Insight
E-Plane
Sharp, high-directivity lobe
Ideal for targeted signal transmission
H-Plane
Broader, more uniform radiation
Useful for coverage and uniform
reception
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2962
www.rsisinternational.org
The optimized patch antenna has a directive E-plane pattern, meaning it can transmit or receive effectively in a
specific direction (good for point-to-point links).
The H-plane radiation is more omnidirectional, beneficial for area coverage and consistent performance across
azimuth angles.
The 2D radiation pattern confirms that the optimized patch antenna is:
Highly directional in the E-plane, perfect for focused transmission
Broad and symmetrical in the H-plane, ensuring coverage across a horizontal sector
Efficient and effective for wireless communications, Wi-Fi, terrestrial links, and radar systems
Suggestions for Further Work
Multi-Objective Optimization: The GA optimization process can be extended to include multiple objectives,
such as maximizing gain, minimizing return loss, and reducing size.
Hybrid Optimization Methods: The GA optimization process can be combined with other optimization
methods, such as particle swarm optimization (PSO) or ant colony optimization (ACO), to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the optimization process.
Experimental Verification: The GA-optimized patch antenna design can be experimentally verified using
prototyping and measurement techniques to validate the simulation results.
Application-Specific Design: The GA optimization process can be applied to specific applications, such as 5G,
IoT, or satellite communications, to design patch antennas with optimized performance characteristics for
those applications.
CONCLUSION
The optimization of a patch antenna using Genetic Algorithm optimization technique was successful. This
optimization was carried out for a wider range of parameters. Improvements in antenna gain, return loss and
resonance frequency was seen that is 9.5dB, -30.2dB and 2.399GHz respectively. Making it suitable for
wireless communication applications. The work was done using python programming language, using Genetic
Algorithm techniques. The simulation of the optimized antenna was done using CST microwave studio. The
GA used population size of 200, number of genetic of 200 cross over probability of 0.8 and mutation
probability of 0.1 selection method was tournament selection.
REFERENCES
1. R. Garg, P. Bhartia, I. Bahl, and A. Ittipiboon, "Microstrip Antenna Design Handbook," Artech House,
2001.
2. J. R. James and P. S. Hall, "Handbook of Microstrip Antennas," Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1989.
3. R. L. Haupt, "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2723-2731, 2003.
4. D. E. Goldberg, "Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning,"
Addison-Wesley, 1989.
5. R. L. Haupt and D. H. Werner, "Genetic Algorithms in Electromagnetics," Wiley-IEEE Press, 2007.
6. S. K. Goudos et al., "Multi-objective optimization of a patch antenna using genetic algorithm," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3441-3444, 2011.
A. F. Sheta et al., "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas
and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 4721-4728, 2012.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2963
www.rsisinternational.org
7. M. A. Elmansouri et al., "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna for 5G applications," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 4331-4338, 2015.
8. J. L. Huffman and J. C. Perry, "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna," IEEE Transactions
on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1333-1338, 1996.
9. R. L. Haupt, "Genetic algorithm design of a patch antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1521-1524, 1997.
10. J. M. Johnson and Y. Rahmat-Samii, "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1525-1528, 1997.
11. K. L. Virga and Y. Rahmat-Samii, "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna array," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1339-1342, 2001.
A. F. Sheta and M. I. A. Lahlou, "Multi-objective optimization of a patch antenna using genetic
algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2941-2944, 2006.
12. S. K. Goudos et al., "Multi-objective optimization of a patch antenna using genetic algorithm," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3441-3444, 2011.
13. M. A. Elmansouri et al., "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna for 5G applications," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 5331-5334, 2018.
14. S. K. Singh et al., "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna for IoT applications," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 6441-6444, 2020.
15. J. Liu et al., "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna array," IEEE Transactions on Antennas
and Propagation, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 6451-6458, 2020.
16. R. K. Singh et al., "Genetic algorithm optimization of a patch antenna for 6G applications," IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 5331-5338, 2022.