a
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the study. At its core, it depicts the various elements that constitute
the current campus infrastructure.
It's worth noting that we have taken a significant step towards enhancing this system. We have recently
procured a dedicated cloud database solely for our campus operations.
Wherein it is where our schools website is hosted. We also have the SACARIAS system mainly use by the
registrar, accounting, faculty for the online enrollment, scholarship, assessment , grading, and billing of
students. We also have the Library Management System wherein all archive books are stored. There is also a
system for Procurement, a Document Tracking System. And under the Research & Extension, a recording
Management System.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This feasibility study centers on the intersection of emerging development concepts, information technology,
and public demand. It will conduct a systematic and comprehensive study of the smart campus system from
multiple perspectives, including infrastructure, platform data analysis, and smart campus system services. The
goal is to build a smart campus platform that serves students, teachers, campus administrators, and
stakeholders. This research holds significant theoretical and practical value for the reform of Apayao State
College.
To gather a more comprehensive understanding of smart campuses and smart cities, the researcher should
broaden their survey scope beyond just students, utilizing open-ended questions for all participants.
Additionally, for more accurate data collection on people's understanding of smart city applications within a
smart campus, the researcher should consider methods beyond Google Forms, such as employing data
collection models.
REFERENCES
1. Brown, T., Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2020). Feasibility studies in higher education smart campus planning.
Higher Education Journal, 45(3), 112–126.
2. Gomez, P., Santos, R., & Cruz, M. (2018). Challenges of smart campus adoption in Philippine higher
institutions. Asian Education Review, 29(2), 55–72.
3. Lee, H., Park, J., & Choi, M. (2019). Barriers to smart campus implementation. Journal of Technology
in Education, 12(1), 45–60.
4. Musa, M., Ismail, M. N., & Fudzee, M. F. M. (2021). A survey on smart campus implementation in
Malaysia. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 5(1), 51–56.
https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.5.1.681
5. Silva-da-Nóbrega, P. I., Chim-Miki, A. F., & Castillo-Palacio, M. (2022). A smart campus framework:
Challenges and opportunities for education based on the sustainable development goals. Sustainability,
14(15), 9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159640
6. Valks, B., Arkesteijn, M. H., Koutamanis, A., & den Heijer, A. C. (2021). Towards a smart campus:
Supporting campus decisions with Internet of Things applications. Building Research & Information,
49(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2020.1784702
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To Dr. John N Cabansag., the College President of Apayao State College; Dr. Ronald Ocampo, the Vice
President for Academics, Research & Development and Extension Services; Dr. Maria Christina M. Zarate,
Director for Research & Special Projects; for their inspiring piece of advice, strong motivation, and
encouragement in pursuing the conduct of the study.
To all the faculty and staff of the IT department, for their genuine concern, constructive criticisms, suggestions
and recommendations for the betterment of the study.