
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 202
Based on these findings and her failure to respond to empirical IV and oral antibiotics and anti-tuberculosis
treatment, we made a revised diagnosis of SLE with LP. Anti-tuberculosis treatment was stopped and intravenous
pulsed methylprednisolone (1,000 mg/day) for three days was given, followed by oral prednisolone 40mg/day
and oral Azathioprine 50mg/day. There was gradual improvement of the symptoms with disappearance of clinical
signs. There was also marked resolution of radiographic findings in the follow up chest X- rays and CT scan
thorax at the follow up (see Figures 2 and 4). The patient was discharged on steroids and Azathioprine at
maintenance doses and continues to do well on follow up at the outpatient department (OPD); she has been able
to return to work.
This case report describes a severe case of LP in a patient with no pre-existing diagnosis of SLE in a setting with
high TB endemicity and limited diagnostic resources and demonstrates the importance of thorough clinical
assessment and re-evaluation of diagnosis when response to treatment is not as expected.
LP is relatively rare, but is a serious complication of SLE. It necessitates prompt and effective intervention to
prevent its potentially lethal outcomes (13). The diagnosis of LP presents significant challenges due to its
nonspecific clinical manifestations that often mimic other pulmonary disorders and the fact it is not a common
manifestation during the primary presentation of SLE. It generally presents with acute onset of fever, cough,
tachypnea and hypoxia. The usual radiological features of LP are consolidation in one or more areas, usually
basal and bilateral, and often associated with pleural effusion and pulmonary arterial hypertension [1]. The
underlying histology in cases of LP are those of diffuse alveolar damage, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing
pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia, or a combination of these [4]. The mortality of lupus
pneumonitis is around 50%, with respiratory failure being the primary cause of death [5]. The diagnosis of LP is
primarily by exclusion of other causes of lung infiltration such as infective pneumonia (bacterial, mycobacterial,
fungal and viral), organizing pneumonia, alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism among others.
In our case the primary suspicion was indeed of an infective origin, especially CAP and/or TB, on account of the
chronic temporal pattern of the symptoms and signs with a positive history of contact with tuberculosis.
However, when repeated sputum analysis ruled out a possible infective aetiology the index of suspicion shifted
towards other possible causes and finally the diagnosis of LP was established by the clinical manifestations,
HRCT findings, anti-nuclear antibody panel and dramatic response to corticosteroids.
Managing SLE by acute lupus pneumonitis in resource-limited countries is particularly challenging due to
multiple clinical, logistical, and systemic factors. Diagnostic challenges, limited access to advanced imaging
such HRCT is the gold standard to detect ALP, but many hospitals may only have X-ray capabilities, and early
subtle lung changes may be missed leading to delayed diagnosis. ALP may mimic pneumonia or TB which are
prevalent in resource-limited settings, and misdiagnosis often leads to inappropriate antibiotic therapy instead of
immunosuppression. Timor Leste faces a high TB burden; WHO, in 2022 global TB report stated Democratic
republic of Timor-Leste ranking 6
th
with incidence rate of 498 cases per 100,000 population, making it the highest
in the SEA region.
Another important diagnostic challenge in resource-limited settings is limited laboratory testing; autoantibody
panels (ANA, anti-dsDNA) and complement levels may not be readily available. Bronchoscopy and
bronchoalveolar lavage for ruling out infection are often unavailable. Such as in our case, complement levels,
bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were not done because they are not available in our setting; tests for
ANA and dsDNA are only available in the private setting, not in all government hospitals.
Meanwhile, limited or lack of availability of immunosuppressive drugs, high-dose IV corticosteroids and
biologics/targeted therapies such as Belimumab and Rituximab in resource-limited settings make the
management of SLE very challenging. Still another challenge is the decision to commence immunosuppression
therapy in areas with high of TB or other endemic infection (e.g. strongyloides), along with the increased risk of
opportunistic infection to the patient, with limited capacity for infection monitoring and prophylaxis, limitation
of supportive care such as Intensive care unit (ICU) with oxygen therapy, monitoring and rapid response to
respiratory failure as compare to high resource setting in developed countries (10,11,12,13,14)