spatial abilities. The causes of errors made by students are translation errors caused by students not
understanding the data mentioned in the question, not understanding the physical symbols for the data
mentioned in the question, not being careful in carrying out calculation operations (Sari et al., 2013).
As a field of study, scientific communication is heavily influenced by other disciplines, which means that
practitioners as well as researchers bring in a rich variety of knowledge, related to their own backgrounds. The
variety of communication approaches and roles for communicators, as well as their different backgrounds,
make the field of science communication complex, challenging, and interesting (Dijkstra, et al., 2017).
CONCLUSION
In line with the objectives of this research, the conclusion that can be drawn is that the total scientific
communication ability on direct current electricity material is in the medium category and there are differences
in scientific communication ability in terms of its aspects. The highest aspect of students' scientific
communication skills in direct current electricity is the ability to make tables/graphs and the lowest is the
ability to interpret. In addition, the scientific communication ability is also influenced by mastery of teaching
material.
The limitations of this research included that students' scientific communication abilities were only measured
based on the results of written essay tests only. Besides that, not all aspects of scientific communication were
comprehensively explored in this research. For further researchers could carry out in-depth interview and apply
mixing method-research to deepen these findings, researchers can consider some factors e.g initial
mathematical concept abilities, mastery of teaching materials, and language skills that apply descriptive-
comparative research or apply multiple regression analysis.
REFERENCES
1. Akbar, B., & Delvira, A. (2022). Hubungan Keterampilan Membuat Tabel Dengan Keterampilan Membuat
Grafik Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 6(2), 202-208.
2. Auliasari, V., Supriyadi, S., & Linuwih, S. (2019). Learning strategy of think talk write based inquiry
approach toward the scientific communication ability of students. Physics Communication, 3(2), 2130.
3. Dewi, N. H. F. (2022). Pengembangan Sistem Komunikasi Alternatif dan Augmentatif IT. 2 dalam
Meningkatkan Komunikasi Anak Cerebral Palsy (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia).
4. Hybels,I., Saundra, F. & Weaver, R. (2007). Communication Effectively. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Indrawati, F. A., & Wardono, W. (2019). February). Pengaruh self efficacy terhadap kemampuan literasi
matematika dan pembentukan kemampuan 4C. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika,
2(1), 247-267.
6. Kalsum, U., Djudin, T., & Oktavianty, E.(2023). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains siswa pada materi
getaran dan gelombang. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 100-109.
7. Kilic, D., Sezen, N., & Sari, M. (2012). A study of pre-service science teacher's graphing skills.
ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2937-2941.
8. Kozma et al. (2000) ‘The Role of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their
Implications for Chemistry Learning’, The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 9 (1), 105–143.
9. Kurniawan, D. E., Ngazizah, N., & Kurniawan, E. S. (2013). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja siswa (LKS)
dengan Pendekatan Investigasi Kelompok Guna Mengoptimalkan Keterampilan Berkomunikasi dan
Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 2 Purworejo Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. RADIASI: Jurnal
Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 63-67.
10. Levy. (2009). Teaching Scientific Communication Skills in Science Studies: Does It Make a Difference?
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 95–113.
11. Mahfuz, M. (2017). Peranan Komunikasi dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Bimbingan
dan Konseling Ar-Rahman, 2(1), 79–91.
12. Mustain, I. (2015). Kemampuan membaca dan interpretasi grafik dan data: Studi kasus pada siswa kelas 8
SMPN. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 4(2), 149-156.
Page 3566