Perceptions of the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) At  
Tertiary Institutions in South Eastern Nigeria  
Vincent Chukwukadibia Onwughalu  
Department of Public Administration, Federal Polytechnic, Oko, Anambra State, Nigeria  
Received: 02 November 2025; Accepted: 08 November 2025; Published: 21 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The study advocates for the expansion of the Nigerian Education Loan Fund’s (NEL Fund) mandate to include  
the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP), in order to accommodate more financially disadvantaged  
students who cannot access student loans. The primary objective of the study is to determine the availability of  
SWAP in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. In addition, it examines the impact of SWAP on the completion of  
undergraduate studies and the enhancement of post-graduation employment opportunities. The scope of the  
study covers tertiary institutionsuniversities, polytechnics, and colleges of educationin South Eastern  
Nigeria that are owned by the federal and state governments as well as private establishments. Using an  
exploratory mixed methods approach, data were collected from 104 respondents (staff and students) across 20  
institutions that reflect this institutional mix. The findings reveal that: (i) SWAP is available in only a few  
institutions in South Eastern Nigeria; (ii) there is a need to introduce SWAP in all tertiary institutions where it  
is currently unavailable; (iii) SWAP has a positive effect on undergraduate study completion, as it improves  
completion rates and reduces dropout rates; (iv) SWAP provides opportunities for students to acquire  
workplace knowledge and skills; (v) awareness of SWAP among staff and students is relatively low; and (vi)  
SWAP should be made a mandatory programme in tertiary institutions in Nigeria to support financially  
disadvantaged students. The study makes policy recommendations for the development of a financial aid  
system that integrates SWAP into NEL Fund, and funded through the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TET  
Fund).  
Keywords: Dropout rate, Financial aid system, Knowledge and skills for workplaces, Nigerian Education  
Loan Fund (NEL Fund), Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP), Tertiary institutions in South Eastern  
Nigeria  
INTRODUCTION  
Education and societal advancement are closely interconnected, sharing both asymmetrical and symmetrical  
relationships. Education drives societal development through innovation, environmental improvement, and  
capacity building. Conversely, societal advancement contributes to infrastructural development and increased  
access to education. The nexus between education and development is well documented in the literature and  
remains a subject of enduring scholarly interest (Nziadam & Amadioha, 2025; Gado, 2024; Onwughalu, 2022).  
Over time, various strategies have been employed to increased access to education and support learners in  
completing studies at different levels. These include government-led initiatives such as budgetary funding, free  
education policies, infrastructural development, international collaborations with organisations like the World  
Bank and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), as well as legislation  
such as the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFund), (Akinteye, 2025; World Bank Group, 2025;  
Heyneman & Lee, 2016).  
In Nigeria, following the enactment of the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) (Repeal and Re-  
enactment) Act, 2024, on April 3, 2024, the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NEL Fund), came into effect, and  
started operations on May 24, 2024 (Ngelale, 2024; Bolaji, 2024; Odinkonigbo, 2025). The history of student  
loans in Nigeria can be traced to 1972 with the establishment of the Nigeria Students Loans Board (NSLB)  
Page 3745  
through Decree 25 of 1972, under the regime of General Yakubu Gowon. In 1976, its scope of coverage was  
expanded through Decree 21 to increase access to the loans. The scheme was reorganised with the  
promulgation of Decree 12 of 1988. In 1993, by the virtue of Decree 50, the Board was decentralised and the  
National Education Bank replaced the Nigerian Students Loan Board (The Cable, 2024; Abdullahi, 2024;  
Quadri, 2024; Odinkonigbo, 2025).  
The Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) is another form of support that promotes the completion of  
undergraduate studies and reduces dropout rate. However, in Nigeria, the programme has not received  
adequate attention or consideration despite its inherent benefits. Of particular relevance is the direct assistance  
it offers to undergraduates, which helps to meet institutional obligations and enhance their capacity to fit in and  
function effectively at workplaces after graduation.  
The origin of the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) known also as Work-Study Programme (WSP), can  
be traced to Europe, particularly Switzerland and Australia, where the “European Student Relief (ESR) was  
established on August 7, 1920.” The philosophy behind the evolution of SWAP transitioned from providing  
various forms of support to students after World War I to creating “working students” who could finance their  
education (Nies, 2020). Since its inception, the basic eligibility requirement for participation is verifiable need  
for assistance without discrimination based on colour, sex, belief, or other factors, which has remained  
consistent. However, institutions have introduced additional criteria in line with their local contexts and  
programme structures (Suleiman, 2023; Ooreofe, 2023).  
SWAP, which began as the “European Student Relief,” later expanded to 19 European countries and 42  
countries across four continents, including North America, (Nies, 2020). In the United States, for instance, the  
Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, now known as the Higher Education Act of 1965 introduced the Federal  
Work-Study Program in the country (Kagan, 2024). In Africa, the programme is implemented in tertiary  
institutions in countries such as Cameroon, Ghana, Uganda, South Africa, among other countries (Africa  
Renewal University, 2025; Adi University, 2022; Palm University College, 2012). In Nigeria, some tertiary  
institutions owned by the federal and state governments, as well as private establishments, have adopted and  
implemented the programme (Madonna University, n.d; Babcock University, 2025; University of Ibadan,  
2012; University of Benin, 2022). However, when the total number of tertiary institutions in the country is  
compared with those that have introduced and implemented the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP), its  
presence could be described as a drop in the ocean. This partly accounts for the paucity of research on SWAP  
in the Nigerian context, especially in the light of the financial challenges faced by many undergraduates in the  
country.  
The foregoing circumstances motivated this study, which advocates the development of a financial aid system  
that integrates the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) into the Nigerian Education Loan Fund  
(NELFund), to be funded through the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund). The study is structured into  
seven sections. The introductory section provides the background to the study, followed by a brief review of  
the literature in section two. Section three presents the methodology, detailing the research design, area of  
study, population, and methods of data collection and analysis. Section four contains the findings and  
discussions. Section five presents the policy recommendations for integrating SWAP into NELFund. Section  
six presents the conclusion of the study, while sections seven and eight addressed the study’s limitations and  
suggestions for further research, respectively.  
Statement of the Problem  
Several factors contribute to the inability of some undergraduates in Nigeria to complete their studies or lead to  
their eventual withdrawal from tertiary institutions. Chief among these is inadequate funding, which limits  
students’ capacity to meet essential financial obligations to their institutions (Nurmalitasari & Faizuddin, 2023;  
Lorenzo-Quiles, Galdón-López, & Lendínez-Turón, 2023; Odinkonigbo, 2025). A practical approach to  
addressing this challenge is the provision of student loans alongside the introduction or expansion of the  
Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) across tertiary institutions in the country.  
Page 3746  
Objectives of the Study  
The broad objective of this study is to propose a policy recommendation for a financial aid system that  
integrates the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) into the mandate and scope of the Nigerian Education  
Loan Fund’s (NELFund).  
The specific objectives are to:  
(i). Determine the availability of the Students Work Aid Programe (SWAP) in tertiary institutions in South  
Eastern Nigeria.  
(ii). Ascertain whether SWAP should to be introduced in all tertiary institutions across the country where it is  
currently unavailable.  
(iii). Evaluate the impact of SWAP on completion and dropout rates of undergraduate students.  
(iv). Examine whether SWAP provides opportunities for students to gain knowledge and skills relevant to the  
workplace.  
(v). Assess the level of awareness of SWAP among staff and students in tertiary institutions in South Eastern  
Nigeria.  
(vi). Determine whether SWAP should be made a mandatory programme in Nigerian tertiary institutions to  
support financially disadvantaged students.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
The varied terminology used by tertiary institutions to describe financial assistance for economically  
disadvantaged students often obscures discourse on the subject. One such term is the Study Work Programme  
(SWP), which refers to a study arrangement for workers or employees enrolled in tertiary institutions on a full-  
time or part-time basis (Avdic & Gartell, 2015; Devilly, Jasin, Lim, & Foo, 2022). Another is the Work-Study  
Programme (WSP), which denotes the type of work students engage inusually off campusdepending on  
their course of study, as part of programme completion requirements. This may be paid or unpaid and is  
variously labelled as placement, internship, fieldwork, industrial training, or attachment (Epprecht, 2004;  
Kenefick, 2015; Epstein, 1973).  
Additionally, the financial assistance provided by tertiary institutions to disadvantaged students who work in  
designated on-campus locations for stipends has been referred to by different names, including Work and  
Study Scheme, Work Study, Work Study Programme, and Student Work Study Programme (Africa Renewal  
University, 2025; Adi University, 2022; Palm University College, 2012; Madonna University, n.d.; Babcock  
University, 2025; University of Ibadan, 2012; University of Benin, 2022). This terminological overlap has led  
to confusing the programme with the Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) in some literature  
(Oyeniyi, 2012).  
For the sake of clarity and to avoid such confusion, this study adopts the term Students Work Aid Programme  
(SWAP) to describe the financial assistance provided by tertiary institutions to economically disadvantaged  
students who work in designated on-campus locations for stipends.  
It is presumed that the Students Work Aid Programme is widely known and implemented in tertiary  
institutions across the world, and that students are therefore aware of its existence (Tuononen, Räisänen, &  
Hyytinen, 2024; Tuononen & Hyytinen, 2022; Drewery & Pretti, 2021; Passaretta & Triventi, 2015). The idea  
behind the programme is that financially disadvantaged students can engage in paid work within their  
institutions while continuing their studies. The philosophy guiding the programme, which appears to be  
universal, is its dual aim of providing financial support to students and offering them opportunities to acquire  
workplace-relevant knowledge and skills. Where the programme is considered effective and efficient, it  
enhances students’ prospects of securing employment upon graduation (Passaretta & Triventi, 2015). In  
Page 3747  
addition, it provides opportunities to apply classroom theories to practical situations, build self-confidence,  
improve efficiency, and develop skills such as effective communication, problem-solving, and teamwork  
(Tuononen, Parpala, & Lindblom-Ylänne, 2017).  
Gaining admission into tertiary institutions does not guarantee completion, as one of the major barriers to  
graduation is the availability of mechanisms for financing undergraduate studies. A significant number of  
enrolled students withdraw before obtaining their credentials or certificates. Therefore, attention should shift  
toward developing strategies aimed at “improving completion rates” (Baum & Schwartz, 2015:38). The  
effectiveness and usefulness of SWAP in some countries have been documented (Ntakana, 2011). Its inherent  
benefits include facilitating the completion of studies and reducing dropout rates (Glocker, 2011; Scott-  
Clayton & Minaya, 2016; Stampen & Cabrera, 1988). The academic performance of participants may  
influence their retention in the programme and contribute to completing their studies within the stipulated time.  
When the work assigned to students aligns with their field of study, it reinforces learning, improves academic  
performance, and enhances future employability (Tuononen, Räisänen, & Hyytinen, 2024; Jackson, 2023;  
Passaretta & Triventi, 2015).  
The programme can have either positive or negative effects on students, particularly in terms of academic  
performance and employability (Monteiro, Almeida, & Garcia-Aracil, 2016; Sawhney & Bansal, 2015). In  
many cases, there is a misalignment between the jobs students undertake and their fields of study, which  
negatively affects their post-graduation employment prospects. As Kenefick (2015:1) observes, “Too often,  
though, the jobs they take are not in their field of study, which can impair the potential for career exploration  
and improved employment outcomes in the future.”  
In light of the above, research on the Students Work Aid Programme in Nigeria remains very limited. The few  
existing studies have focused on the programme’s relevance, impact, and the challenges encountered by  
participating students (Omonijo, Anyaegbunam, & Okoye, 2020; Oludayo, Omonijo, Uche, Rotimi, &  
Nwadialor, 2014; Ilori & Akerele, 2024). Other works have concentrated on the Students Industrial Work  
Experience Scheme (SIWES) (Auru & Wakili, 2020; Anyaeneh & Ochuba, 2019; Ogbuanya, Njoku, Kemi, &  
Ogunkelu, 2018; Oyeniyi, 2012). There is an urgent need to first map the existence of the programme,  
especially in the face of current economic realities and the financial challenges experienced by many students  
in the country, in order to determine where it is implemented and where it is not. This would provide a basis  
for evaluating its performance in institutions where it exists, particularly in terms of the work experience it  
offers, its relevance to workplace demands, and its role in addressing the skills mismatch contributing to high  
unemployment levels in Nigeria. To contribute to filling this gap, the present study explores the perceptions of  
staff and students regarding SWAP in tertiary institutions in South Eastern Nigeria.  
METHODOLOGY  
Research Design  
The research design for this study is exploratory mixed methods. The design combines qualitative and  
quantitative approaches to explore the perceptions staff and students in tertiary institutions in South Eastern  
Nigeria about the Students Work Aid Programme. The approach integrates qualitative and quantitative data  
that enables the study to provide insights and understanding on SWAP in terms of availability, awareness,  
benefits and perceived impact. The design is adopted because research and literature on the Students Work Aid  
Programme in Nigeria is very limited, and to generate information needed for informed policy  
recommendations that guide practice.  
Area of the Study  
The study was conducted in South Eastern Nigeria, comprising five states, namely Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi,  
Enugu, and Imo States. South Eastern Nigeria is one of the six geo-political zones or regions in Nigeria.  
Page 3748  
Population of the Study and Sampling Technique  
The population of the study comprised all tertiary institutionsuniversities, polytechnics, and colleges of  
educationin South Eastern Nigeria that are owned by the federal and state governments as well as private  
establishments. When the study was conducted, according to the National Universities Commission (n.d),  
National Board for Technical Education (n.d) and National Commission for Colleges of Education (n.d), the  
five states in South Eastern Nigeria have a total 85 accredited tertiary institutions as shown in table 1 below.  
The target population included staff and students of these institutions.  
Table 1: Tertiary Institutions in South Eastern Nigeria  
S/N  
1.  
Nature of ownership of institutions Universities Polytechnics  
Colleges of Education  
Federal  
State  
8
5
4
2.  
10  
24  
42  
5
5
3.  
Private  
Total  
11  
21  
13  
22  
Sources: Adapted from the National Universities Commission. (n.d). Nigerian Universities.  
https://www.nuc.edu.ng/ National Board for Technical Education. (n.d). Approved Polytechnics.  
https://www.digitalnbte.nbte.gov.ng/Public/PUCPolytechnics National Commission for Colleges of Education.  
(n.d). NCCE Accredited Colleges. https://ncce.gov.ng/AccreditedColleges  
Due to the large size of the population, a combination of purposive and cluster sampling techniques was used  
to sample a total of 20 institutions (that reflected the institutional mix or diversity) and 104 respondents (47  
staff 46.2%) and (57 students 53.8%) across the participating institutions were involved (see figure 1). While  
purposive sampling ensured that institutions where SWAP is available and unavailable were included, cluster  
sampling ensured that the three categories of tertiary institutions (universities, polytechnics, colleges of  
education) and ownership types (federal, state, private) were represented.  
Figure 1: Status of Respondents  
Methods of Data Collection and Analysis  
Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires (with both closed and open-ended items).  
Secondary data were obtained through the review of relevant literature. On the other hand, percentages were  
used to analyze quantitative data, and qualitative data were analyzed through content and thematic analyses.  
Page 3749  
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS  
The broad objective of this study is to rely on integrated qualitative insights and quantitative data generated  
from foundational information to propose policy recommendations for a financial aid system that integrates the  
Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) into the mandate and scope of the Nigerian Education Loan Fund’s  
(NELFund).  
The presentation of the findings and discussions are done in line with the order of the study’s objectives.  
(Un)availability of the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) in Tertiary Institutions  
The study found that SWAP was available in only a few tertiary institutions and unavailable in most, as shown  
in figure 2. Notably, even in institutions where the programme had been in place for a considerable period,  
some respondents still indicated that SWAP was unavailable in their institutions. This suggests a low level of  
awareness, an issue examined under a subsequent theme in this study. Furthermore, this finding reinforces the  
earlier observation in the literature review regarding the limited research on the Students Work Aid  
Programme in Nigeria. This not only helps to explain, at least in part, why the programme may not be widely  
known in the country, but also underscores the need for calls for more research on the programme.  
Figure 2: (Un)availability of SWAP in Tertiary Institutions  
Introduction of Students Work Aid Programme in all Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria  
Despite the low level of awareness of the programme among respondents, an overwhelming majority indicated  
that SWAP should be introduced in all tertiary institutions across the country where it is currently unavailable  
(see figure 3). This response may not be unconnected with the introductory section to the survey instrument,  
which provided a brief explanation of SWAP, its inherent benefits, and the specific objectives of the study.  
The information presented may have increased respondents’ understanding of the programme and in turn,  
influenced their responses.  
Figure 3: SWAP should be introduced in all tertiary institutions across the country  
Page 3750  
Impact of Students Work Aid Programme on Study Completion and Dropout Rates  
Globally, the reasons for the introduction and sustainability of the student loan scheme are largely similar.  
These include expanding access to tertiary education, facilitating the completion of studies, and addressing  
manpower needs by producing a skilled workforce (Ayoko, 2025; Abdulrahman, 2023; Oluwole, 2023;  
Ziderman, 2002; Salmi, 2003). The findings of this study revealed that SWAP also embodies these features  
among its inherent benefits (see figures 4 & 5 below). Specifically, the programme has a positive relationship  
with tertiary education, as it facilitates the completion of studies and reduces the dropout rate through the  
financial support it provides to students.  
Figure 4: SWAP support students financially to complete their studies  
Figure 5: SWAP reduces dropout rate through the financial support it provides to students  
Students Work Aid Programme and Opportunities to Acquire Knowledge and Skills Relevant to the  
Workplace  
The study further revealed that owing to the hands-on training provided by SWAP, students are able to acquire  
practical skills and knowledge that are directly relevant to the workplace (see figure 6). This complements the  
theoretical knowledge imparted in classrooms and enhances the production of a skilled workforce. In tertiary  
institutions where SWAP is available, the programme creates diverse work opportunities, including  
engagement in institutionsventures on campus and facilities such as the campus radio station, library,  
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Unit, event planning, clerical services, compound  
maintenance, and related activities.  
Page 3751  
Figure 6: SWAP creates diverse work opportunities for students to acquire practical skills and knowledge  
relevant to workplace  
Given the types of jobs students engage in, the knowledge they acquire, and the skills they develop (Jackson &  
Tomlinson, 2022), SWAP can have either positive or negative implications for students’ academic  
performance and employability (Monteiro, Almeida, & Garcia-Aracil, 2016; Sawhney, & Bansal, 2015). When  
students’ assigned works in the programme are directly related to their courses of study, they tend to reinforce  
classroom learning, improve academic performance, and enhance future employment prospects (Neubert,  
1997; Tuononen, Räisänen, & Hyytinen, 2024; Jackson, 2023; Passaretta, & Triventi, 2015).  
However, the types of jobs listed above raise two major concerns: (i) whether students in the programme are  
assigned to roles that aligned with their fields of study, and (ii) whether the knowledge and skills gained  
through SWAP are directly relevant to workplace needs. As shown in figure 6, an overwhelming majority of  
respondents agreed that the knowledge and skills acquired through SWAP are relevant to the workplace.  
Nevertheless, this study observes that while some students are placed in roles connected to their academic  
disciplines, others are not. Similarly, not all the knowledge and skills gained through SWAP may directly  
address workplace requirements.  
As a corollary to the above, a follow-up question was posed to determine whether the knowledge and skills  
acquired through SWAP help bridge the skills mismatch gaps between what is taught in schools and what is  
demanded in the workplace. The responses revealed a notable decline in the number of respondents who  
agreed, alongside an increase in those who either disagreed or were uncertain, as shown in figure 7. This  
contrasts with the more optimistic results presented in figure 6.  
Figure 7: SWAP and bridging skills mismatch gaps  
Skills mismatch remains a global challenge, particularly in relation to graduate unemployment (Zheliabovskii,  
2025; International Labour Organization, 2019). One potential strategy for addressing this challenge is to  
prioritize industry-based knowledge and workplace-relevant training, which can both strengthen SWAP’s  
impact in tertiary institutions and, conversely, be enhanced through its implementation.  
Page 3752  
Level of Awareness of SWAP among Staff and Students in Tertiary Institutions  
The Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES), introduced in Nigeria in 1973 by the Industrial  
Training Fund (ITF) (Industrial Training Fund, n.d; Oyeniyi, 2012), is a compulsory programme in all tertiary  
institutions in the country. Although not all courses or disciplines are eligible to participate, it is generally  
assumed that staff and students in tertiary institutions should have some level of awareness of SIWES.  
However, the findings of this study reveal that some respondents reported being unaware of SIWES, despite its  
compulsory status in Nigerian tertiary institutions (see Figure 8). This suggests that gaps in communication or  
orientation may exist within tertiary institutions.  
Figure 8: SIWES is available in tertiary institutions in Nigeria  
Given the established level of awareness of SIWES, this study used it as a reference point to compare with  
SWAP in assessing the level of awareness of the latter. To achieve this, the respondents were asked a similar  
question in two different forms. When asked whether SIWES is different from SWAP, the majority indicated  
that the two programmes are indeed different (see Figure 9).  
Figure 9: SIWES is different from SWAP  
On whether SIWES and SWAP are the same, the findings in Figure 10 reveal a relatively low level of  
awareness of SWAP, particularly when compared with the results in Figure 9. The proportion of respondents  
who affirmed that SIWES and SWAP are different decreased from 72.1% to 66.3%, thereby confirmation that  
not all respondents clearly distinguished between the two programmes. Similarly, when the responses of those  
who believed that both programmes are the same (12.5%) and those who were uncertain (21.2%) are  
combined, the proportion is significant rather than negligible.  
The outcome aligns with earlier patterns observed in the study, where notable proportions of respondents  
expressed disagreement or uncertainty on related themes. Taken together, these findings corroborate the  
conclusion that awareness of SWAP remains relatively low among staff and students in tertiary institutions.  
Page 3753  
Figure 10: SIWES and SWAP are the same  
Both the Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) and the Students Work Aid Programme  
(SWAP) operate within tertiary institutions in Nigeria and share the common goal of equipping students with  
skills and knowledge relevant to the workplace. However, their design, scope and implementation differ  
significantly. SIWES targets students in specific disciplines and is implemented primarily through industrial  
attachments or placements outside the campus. By contrast, SWAP is open to students across all disciplines  
and functions as a multi-purpose programme aimed at providing financial support, facilitating the completion  
of studies, reducing dropout rates, and offering work opportunities within the campus environment.  
SWAP as a Mandatory Programme in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions  
Despite the relatively low level of awareness of SWAP, the majority of respondents expressed the view that it  
should be institutionalized as a mandatory programme in Nigerian tertiary institutions (see Figure 11). In  
essence, the findings suggested that SWAP should be made available across all tertiary institutions in the  
country, similar to SIWES. This position appears to be linked to respondents’ recognition of the inherent  
benefits of SWAP in supporting students and enhancing their educational outcomes.  
Figure 11: SWAP should be a mandatory programme in tertiary institutions in Nigeria  
Developing a Financial Aid System in Nigeria: Policy Recommendations for Integrating the Students  
Work Aid Programme (SWAP) into the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFund)  
A streamlined and well-coordinated financial aid system, comprising scholarships, grants, loans (federal and  
state governments, private), the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP), and related support mechanisms, is  
largely lacking in Nigeria. Ideally, if such a system exists, it should assist students and their families in  
covering tertiary education expenses like tuition, fees, accommodation, learning materials, stationeries,  
transportation and upkeep. The recent reintroduction of student loans in the country has renewed national  
attention and intensified discourses around the broader structure of financial assistance. This study, however,  
focuses specifically on student loans and the Students Work Aid Programme, acknowledging that other types  
of assistance exist in uncoordinated and fragmented forms across the country.  
Page 3754  
The student loans and the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) share several core objectives. Both are  
need-based interventions aimed at expanding access to education by providing financial support, promoting the  
completion of studies, and reducing dropout rates. Additionally, both require applicants to be bona fide  
undergraduate students to qualify for consideration. However, a key distinction lies in repayment, while  
student loans must be repaid, support provided through SWAP is non-payable (Odinkonigbo, 2025; Lake  
Forest College, 2025; Ngoladi, 2025). In Nigeria, student loans are funded directly by the federal government  
through NELFund, while SWAP currently operates at the institutional level. It is typically financed by the  
tertiary institutions where it is available. This institutional funding model may explain its unavailability in  
many institutions across the country.  
Given the shared goals of student loans and SWAP, and the need to further broaden access to tertiary  
education; this study advocates the development of a financial aid system (Akinteye, 2025; Lake Forest  
College, 2025) that integrates SWAP into NELFund. These recommendations are particularly relevant in the  
light of the criticisms and challenges surrounding student loans and NELFund (Durosinmi, 2024; ActionAid  
Nigeria, 2025; Ngoladi, 2025).  
Legislation to Integrate SWAP into NELFund  
This study recommends the expansion of mandate of the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFund) to  
formally integrate the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) into its scope of operations. Such integration  
would broaden the social safety nets available to students, thereby extending support to a larger number of  
financially disadvantaged undergraduates, many of whom are currently unable to access the student loans  
(Durosinmi, 2024; ActionAid Nigeria, 2025).  
Integrating SWAP into NELFund would not only enhance access to tertiary education, but also strengthen the  
financial assistance available to needy students. To achieve this, legislative action by the National Assembly is  
required to amend the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) (Repeal and Re-enactment) Act, 2024. This  
amendment could be initiated through an Executive Bill from the Presidency.  
Participation of Regulatory Agencies, and Supervisory Bodies  
The National Universities Commission (NUC), National Board for Technical Education (NBTE), and the  
National Commission for Colleges of Education (NCCE) as regulatory agencies and supervisory bodies are  
key stakeholders in the tertiary education sub-sector. Already, they play central roles in the administration and  
implementation of the Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES), and the experience positions  
them strategically to support the integration of SWAP into NELFund.  
These agencies can play three crucial roles in this regard: (i) Through policy advocacy, they can engage the  
Federal Ministry of Education and the Presidency to highlight the need to integrate SWAP into NELFund as  
part of a broader financial aid framework. (ii) Through institutional mobilization, they can encourage tertiary  
institutions to prepare and submit formal proposals to the Presidency and the National Assembly in support of  
amending the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, 2024 to accommodate SWAP. (iii) When  
SWAP is integrated into NELFund, they can play co-administration and oversight roles. These agencies should  
play similar roles in administration, supervision and implementation as they currently do in SIWES. Their  
participation would enhance coordination, accountability, and institutional compliance.  
Funding by the Federal Government and Complemented by Tertiary Institutions  
At present, the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) is funded solely by the tertiary institutions where they  
are available. This model limits its reach and excludes institutions with weaker financial capacity. As a policy  
recommendation, the funding for SWAP should be led by the federal government, with complementary  
support from tertiary institutions where it is financially feasible. The Tertiary Education Trust Fund  
(TETFund) already provides financial support to tertiary institutions in the country in various ways, which  
include resources for teaching, learning, infrastructure, library, laboratory, research, staff development, and  
Page 3755  
innovation (Sowole, 2025). This existing institutional relationship positions TETFund to support SWAP  
integration.  
Section 12 of the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) (Repeal and Re-enactment) Act, 2024 identifies  
“the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund)” as the primary  
funding sources for NELFund (Ngoladi, 2025:3; Odinkonigbo, 2025:30). This existing framework can be  
leveraged to extend funding to SWAP once integrated into NELFund. With the introduction of a new tax  
regime that broadens the tax base, and close revenue leakages (Uwaegbute, Agbeyi, Otufale, Erikune, Adu &  
Siloma, 2025; Akewushola, 2025), more funds will be available to sustain both student loans and SWAP,  
enhancing long-term viability. Thus, SWAP should be formally included in the funding mandate of TETFund,  
enabling expanded national coverage, institutional collaboration, and sustainable financing.  
Mitigating the Challenges of Student Loans Recovery  
A major criticism against the student loan scheme in Nigeria concerns the difficulty of repayment (Abdullahi,  
2024; The Cable, 2024; Ngoladi, 2025; Punch Editorial Board, 2025). The concerns include: high default risks,  
unemployment after graduation, limited repayment mechanisms, etc. Integrating the students Work Aid  
Programme (SWAP) into NELFund can significantly reduce the burden of student loan recovery through a  
mixed-aid model. Instead of relying solely on repayable loans, a portion of financial support would be  
provided as stipends through SWAP. These stipends are non-repayable and as such, they reduce the total loan  
amount disbursed per student. Furthermore, stipends under SWAP are lower in value than the conventional  
loans, and more manageable within the existing funding frameworks. Unlike loans, SWAP offers students  
work-based engagement, enhances skills, productivity, and employment. It also reduces dependence, while  
promoting accountability. By combining repayable and non-repayable aid within NELFund, the pressure of  
loan repayment is reduced, fewer students default, government expenditure becomes more sustainable, and the  
programme gains broader public acceptance.  
CONCLUSION  
The recent reintroduction of student loans in Nigeria has renewed national attention and intensified discussions  
on the broader structure of financial assistance in the tertiary education sector. Drawing on existing literature  
and survey data from staff and students in universities, polytechnics, colleges of education, owned by the  
federal and state governments, and private establishments across the five states of Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi,  
Enugu, and Imo States in South Eastern Nigeria, the study identified key findings that justify the development  
of a financial aid system integrating the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP) into the mandate of  
NELFund.  
The overwhelming support from respondents for the introduction of SWAP in all tertiary institutions in  
Nigeria, alongside the inherent benefits of the programme in expanding access to tertiary education, supporting  
the completion of studies, and contributing to workforce development, forms the foundation of the study’s  
policy recommendations. The advocacy is driven by the need to provide financial assistance to a greater  
number of economically disadvantaged undergraduates who are currently excluded from the student loans, and  
mitigate the challenges associated with the administration of the loan and its repayment. By integrating SWAP  
into NELFund, Nigeria can adopt a more inclusive, flexible, and sustainable financial aid system that supports  
national goals in education, equity, and human capital development.  
Limitations Of The Study  
This study has two major limitations: (i) scope of the study and sample size, and (ii) the methods of data  
collection. First, the study covered only the South East zone, which is one of the six geopolitical zones that  
made up the country. This limitation was further compounded by the sample size, as only 20 out of 85  
institutions in the zone were surveyed. Second, in-depth interviews with key informant, which could have  
provided deeper insights into the experiences of institutions, were not included in the methods of data  
collection.  
Page 3756  
These shortcomings affect the findings of the study in ways that may limit their generalisability to the entire  
country. Nevertheless, the findings provide adequate insight into the Students Work Aid Programme (SWAP),  
its inherent benefits, and how it complements student loans. Furthermore, on the one hand, the study offers  
government and policymakers foundational information on the need to develop a financial aid system in the  
country, and, on the other, provides stakeholders with useful material for advocacy.  
Suggestions For Further Research  
Further studies should consider a wider geographic scope and a larger sample size, and should also incorporate  
in-depth interviews with key informants in the data collection process. Additional areas that further research  
could explore include: (i) assessment of existing assistance and support programmes in the country, including  
their accessibility, with a view to informing a comprehensive financial aid system; (ii) given the inherent  
benefits of SWAP, particularly in knowledge and skills acquisition, should SWAP be restricted to only  
financially disadvantaged students or made available to all interested student? (iii) Should SWAP be limited to  
campus-based opportunities only, or should it include opportunities both on-campus and off-campus? Examine  
the (iv) effectiveness, and (v) sustainability of assistance and support programmes, (vi) and their funding  
models.  
FUNDING  
This research was sponsored by the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TET Fund)  
REFERENCES  
1. Abdullahi, B. (2024, May 19). Student loan scheme: Right policy for the wrong reason. Agora  
2. Abdulrahman, H. (2023, June 18). Students loan: Revolutionizing access to higher education in  
3. ActionAid Nigeria. (2025, April 30). ActionAid Nigeria demands accountability, suspension and  
severe penalties for leaders of NEL Fund-fraudulent institutions. Action Aid Nigeria.  
4. Adi University. (2022).  
programs/work-study-programs  
Work Study Programs. https://www.adiuniversity.com/home/  
6. Akewushola, K. (2025, July 3). A new fiscal framework: Key provisions of Nigeria’s 2025 tax  
reform laws. Nigerian Economic Summit Group. https://www.nesgroup.org/blog/ A-New- Fiscal-  
7. Akinteye, J. O. (2025). Financial aid for boosting access to higher education in Nigeria: The case of  
Nigerian Education Loans  
Fund.  
Journal  
of Public  
Administration,  
7(1):35-44.  
8. Anyaeneh, V. K. & Ochuba, C. D. (2019). Influence of Students’ Industrial Work Experience  
Scheme (SIWES) in enhancing employable skills of business education students in federal tertiary  
institutions in Anambra State. Multidisciplinary Journal of Education, Research and Development,  
3(1), 167-180  
9. Auru, H. O. & Wakili, L. M. (2020). Effects of Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme on  
students’ readiness for world of work. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education,  
12(1), 1-7  
10. Avdic, D., & Gartell, M. (2015). Working while studying? Student aid design and socioeconomic  
achievement disparities in higher education. Labour Economics, 33, 26-40.  
11. Ayoko, V. O. (2025). Students’ loan in Nigerian tertiary institutions: Benefits and problems. European  
Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education, 5(6), 248-252  
Page 3757  
hr/work-study  
13. Baum, S., & Schwartz, S. (2015). Student aid, student behavior, and educational attainment. In B. L,  
Castleman; S. Schwartz & S. Baum (Eds), Decision making for student success: Behavioral insights to  
improve college access and persistence (pp. 38-62). Routledge.  
14. Bolaji, A. (2024, May 27). Long-awaited student loan: Thousands apply. University World  
News.  
15. Devilly, O., Jasin, J., Lim, S. M., & Foo, Y. L. (2022). Experience of students in cooperative  
education–A case study of Singapore’s work-study degree programme. Journal of Adult and  
Continuing Education, 28(2), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/147797 14211030950  
16. Drewery, D, & Pretti, T. J. (2021). The building blocks of relevant work experiences. International  
Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 22(2), 241251.  
17. Durosinmi, M. (2024, August 23). Nigerians react to South-East institutions’ exclusion from NEL Fund  
to-south-east-institutions-exclusion-from-nelfund-student-loan-disbursement/  
18. Epprecht, M. (2004). Work-study abroad courses in international development studies: Some ethical  
and pedagogical issues. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 25(4), 687-706.  
19. Epstein, Y. M. (1973). Work-study programs: Do they work?. American Journal of Community  
Psychology, 1(2), 159.  
20. Gado, M. A. (2024). Education-development nexus: The Nigeria’s experience. International Journal of  
Assessment and Evaluation in Education. 6(8). https:/ /doi.org/10.70382/mejaee. v6i8. 002  
21. Glocker, D. (2011). The effect of student aid on the duration of study. Economics of Education  
22. Heyneman, S. P., & Lee, B. (2016). International organizations and the future of education assistance.  
International  
Journal  
of  
Educational  
Development,  
48,  
9-22.  
23. Ilori, O. O. & Akerele, P. O. (2024). Challenges associated with working and studying as expressed by  
undergraduates in the University of Ilorin. Nigeria, Ilorin Journal of Education, 44(1), 344-355  
25. International Labour Organization. (2019). Skills and jobs mismatches in low- and middle income  
countries. International Labour Org  
26. Jackson, D. (2023). The relationship between student employment, employability-building activities  
and graduate outcomes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 48(1), 14-30.  
27. Jackson, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2022). The relative importance of work experience, extra curricular and  
university-based activities on student employability. Higher Education  
Research & Development,  
28. Kagan, J. (2024, November 27). The Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA): Definition and provisions.  
29. Kenefick, E. (2015). Strengthening the" work" in Federal Work-Study: Improving access to financial  
aid and career-related work Experience for low-income and post-traditional students. Center for  
Postsecondary and Economic Success. https://www.clasp.org/sites/ default /files/ public/resources-and-  
publications/publication-1/CPES_FederalWorkstudy FINAL.pdf  
30. Lake Forest College. (2025, September 19). Making sense of financial aid and the value of a college  
31. Lorenzo-Quiles, O. Galdón-López, S. & Lendínez-Turón, A. (2023). Factors contributing to university  
dropout: A review. Frontiers in Education, 8(1159864), 1-13. https://doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1159864  
32. Madonna University. (n.d). Work Study. https://www.madonnauniversity.edu.ng/work-study/  
33. Monteiro, S., Almeida, L., & Garcia-Aracil, A. (2016). Graduates’ perceptions of competencies and  
preparation for labour market transition: The effect of gender and work experience during higher  
education.  
Higher  
Education,  
Skills  
and  
Work-Based  
Learning,  
6(2),  
208220.  
Page 3758  
34. National Board for Technical Education. (n.d). Approved Polytechnics. https://www.  
digitalnbte.nbte.gov.ng/Public/PUCPolytechnics  
35. National Commission for Colleges of Education. (n.d). NCCE Accredited Colleges.  
36. National Universities Commission. (n.d). Nigerian Universities. https://www.nuc.edu.ng/  
37. Neubert, D.A. (1997). Time to grow: The history and future of preparing youth for adult roles in  
society. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(5), 5-17.  
38. Ngelale, A. (2024, April 4). In detail: The Student Loan (Access to Higher Education) Act, 2024.  
39. Ngoladi, U. (2025). Assessing the early impact and implementation of Nelfund: A policy brief. In  
Athena Centre for Policy and Leadership, Athena perspectives: Fresh and deep dimensions to the news  
(pp.2-5), 2(3). https://athenacentre.org/assessing-the-early-impact- and-implementation-of-nelfund-a-  
policy-brief/  
40. Nies, W. (2020). The foundation of WUS and its development over the years. https://wus. org.uk/the-  
foundation-of-wus-and-its-development-over-the-years/  
41. Ntakana, K. N. (2011). The effectiveness of student support programmes at a tertiary institution: A  
case  
study  
of  
Walter  
Sisulu  
University (Doctoral  
dissertation).  
unizulu.ac.za/bitstreams/5dd62db9-2e08-46df-aaee-be89159b093a/download  
42. Nurmalitasari, Awang Long, Z., & Faizuddin Mohd Noor, M. (2023). Factors influencing dropout  
students in higher education. Education Research International, 2023(1), 7704142.  
43. Nziadam, L. & Amadioha, A. (2025). Quality education and national development: The  
nexus.  
10.36348/jaep.2025.v09i03.003  
44. Odinkonigbo, J. J. (2025). The Student Loan (Access to Higher Education) Act 2023: Another white  
elephant project. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Law Journal, 8(1), 30-35  
45. Ogbuanya, T. C, Njoku, C. A, Kemi, P. O. & Ogunkelu, M. O. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness  
of Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) programme to ensure quality of Technical,  
Vocational Education and Training in Technical Colleges in Lagos State. International Journal of  
Vocational and Technical Education, 10(7), 61-69  
46. Oludayo, O. A., Omonijo, D. O., Uche, O. O. C., Rotimi, A. O., & Nwadialor, K. L. (2014). Evaluation  
of students work-study programme: The case of a private (faith-based) higher education institution,  
South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science 4 (6):784-809.  
47. Oluwole, V. (2023, June 13). Nigeria’s student loan bill: Pros and cons explained. Business Insider  
Africa.  
explained/bw2m66s#google_vignette  
48. Omonijo, D. O., Anyaegbunam, M. C., & Okoye, C. A. F. Exploring the relevance of Work study  
Programme in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Arts and Social Studies Research, 2, 85-  
49. Onwughalu, V. C. (2022). Educational curricula design and development in the African  
91  
States, in  
6(8), 308-314.  
50. Ooreofe, O. (2023, November 22). Work-study program: Dominion University’s solution for the  
2023/11/22/work-  
the digital age. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science,  
study-program-dominion-universitys-solution-for-thefinancially -unstable/  
51. Oyeniyi, A. A. (2012). Students' Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) and the  
life/career-services/work-study-program/  
incidence  
student-  
53. Passaretta, G., & Triventi, M. (2015). Work experience during higher education and post  
graduation  
European  
232253.  
occupational  
countries.  
outcomes:  
International  
A
comparative  
of Comparative  
study  
on  
four  
56(3-4),  
Journal  
Sociology,  
54. Punch Editorial Board. (2025, April 24). Student loan scheme failing, it mustn’t. Punch  
Newspaper.  
Page 3759  
55. Quadri, O. (2024, June 20). NELFUND: Origin of student loan in Nigeria. EDUBASE.NG.  
56. Salmi, J. (2003). Student loans in an international perspective: The World Bank experience. LCSHD  
Paper Series, 44. 1-25  
57. Sawhney, N., & Bansal, S. (2015). Metacognitive awareness of undergraduate students in  
relation to  
their academic achievement. The International Journal of Indian Psychology,  
3(1), 107114  
58. Scott-Clayton, J., & Minaya, V. (2016). Should student employment be subsidized?  
Conditional  
counterfactuals and the outcomes of work-study participation. Economics of  
1-18.  
Education Review, 52,  
59. Sowole, J. (2025, February 2). We have allocated N1.8 tn to tertiary institutions in Nigeria,  
says  
60. Stampen, J. O., & Cabrera, A. F. (1988). The targeting and packaging of student aid and its  
effect  
on attrition. Economics of Education Review, 7(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/  
61. Suleiman, Q. (2023, May 27). Nigerian university introduces work study programmes for  
students.  
introduces-work-study-programme-for-students.html?tztc=1  
nigerian-university-  
62. The Cable. (2024, September 6). NELFund gets N2m repayment from beneficiary of 1970s  
student  
63. Tuononen, T., & Hyytinen, H. (2022). Towards a successful transition to work which employability  
factors contribute to early career success? Journal of Education and Work, 35(6-7), 599613.  
64. Tuononen, T., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). The transition from university to working  
life - An exploration of graduates’ perceptions of their academic competences. In E. Kyndt, V. Donche,  
K. Trigwell, & S. Lindblom-Ylänne (Eds.), Higher education transitionstheory and research (pp.  
238253). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group  
65. Tuononen, T., Räisänen, M., & Hyytinen, H. (2024). Students’ work experience in relation to their  
career engagement and metacognitive awareness. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(6),  
1399-1415.  
66. University of Benin. (2022). Work Study. https://uniben.edu/work-study.html  
ui.edu.ng/news/university-ibadan-work-and-study-scheme  
68. Uwaegbute, C.; Agbeyi, E.; Otufale, T.; Erikune, K.; Adu, S. & Siloma. (2025, June 27). The Nigerian  
Tax Reform Acts: Top 20 changes to know and top 10 things to do. Pwc Nigeria.  
69. World Bank Group. (2025, April 22). Education overview: Development news, research, data.  
70. Zheliabovskii, R. (2025, June 6). The global skills mismatch: Creating a future-ready  
workforce.  
future-ready-workforce  
71. Ziderman, A. (2002). Alternative objectives of national student loan schemes: Implications for design,  
evaluation and policy. The Wales Journal of Education, 11(1), 32-47  
Page 3760