3. There exists significant difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores in different
components of writing skills of the Polytechnic College students irrespective of the medium of
instruction they received at school level.
4. There exists significant difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores in different
components of writing skills of the Polytechnic College students irrespective of the income of their
parents.
5. There exists significant difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores in different
components of writing skills of the Polytechnic College students irrespective of the occupation of their
parents.
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY FOR THE RESEARCH WORK
In experimental studies, random sampling is a technique where each member of a population has an equal and
independent chance of being selected for the sample. This method is used to create an unbiased, representative
sample which helps researchers to generalize findings from the sample to the larger population. In this process,
a number will be assigned to each individual and a random number will be generated to select the sample. In
this study ‘Simple Random Sampling’ technique has been used where each member will have an equal chance
of selection.
Fifteen humorous anecdotes have been selected for this reading material. These humorous anecdotes have been
incorporated with some of the communicative activities such as citation, simulation, replication, role-play,
improvisation and comparison and contrast. Citation is a process in which the teacher provides a model
sentence and the students have to write sentences of their own using the same sentence pattern. Simulation is
nothing but imitation of a situation or process. It is an imitative representation of a process or system that could
exist in the real world. Replication is an activity in which students rewrite the text or obtain opinions of other
students regarding the subject matter. Polytechnic College students were also trained in correct use of stress
and intonation. The reading material was subjected to the group try-outs. On the basis of the analysis of the try-
out, required correction, modification and refinements were carried out. In order to ascertain the content
validity, the views of the language experts were obtained. The reliability of the reading material was confirmed
as the students secured same scores in different tests conducted at different time intervals. The performance of
the students in the writing skills was measured and rated with the help of the proficiency descriptions given in
Arthur Hughes’ book entitled Teaching for Language Teachers.
Evaluation procedure in this study is based on the scale devised by John Anderson. Five categories of writing
skills are evaluated using five point scale. In the case of grammar one point will be allotted for the writing with
severe errors of grammar. Two points will be allotted for the writing with very frequent errors of grammar.
Three points will be allotted for the writing with frequent errors of grammar. For occasional errors of grammar
in the writing four points will be given. For few errors of grammar in the writing five points will be given.
Similarly, in the case of vocabulary, points will be awarded in the ascending order for the following types:
extreme vocabulary limitation, misuse of vocabulary items, frequent errors in the use of vocabulary, use of
inappropriate words and use of circumlocution. In the case of mechanics points will be awarded in the
ascending order for the following types: severe spelling errors, very frequent spelling errors, frequent spelling
errors, less spelling errors and no spelling error. In the case of fluency points will be awarded in the ascending
order for the following types: misused structures, inappropriate structures, little sense of ease of
communication, patchy structures and good communication. In the case of form, points will be awarded in the
ascending order for the following types: Severe lack of organization, lack of connection between ideas, little
attempt at connectivity, some lack of organization and well organized material.
To assess the effectiveness of the reading material to improve the communicative competence of the
Polytechnic College students, a test paper was constructed for pre and post tests. Ten written questions were
framed to test the performance of the Polytechnic College students in writing skills. The study is limited to two
polytechnic colleges only viz. Annamalai Polytechnic College, Chettinadu and Government Polytechnic
College, Karaikudi due to constraints of time. One hundred students were taught the selected humorous
anecdotes using the communicative activities for a period of three months. The present study was based on the