Life and Livelihood of Women in the Sundarbans: A Survey  
Pranabesh Giri  
Assistant Professor, Sundarban Hazi Desarat College, West Bengal, India  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 18 November 2025; Published: 24 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The Sundarbans, the world’s largest mangrove delta, sustains millions whose livelihoods depend on its fragile  
ecosystem. Women form the backbone of household and community economies, yet their roles often remain  
undervalued and unrecognized. This study examines the socio-economic conditions, livelihood patterns, and  
adaptive strategies of women in the Indian Sundarbans. Based on field surveys conducted across selected blocks  
of South 24 Parganas, supported by secondary sources, the research explores women’s participation in  
agriculture, aquaculture, forest-based occupations, and cottage industries. The findings highlight significant  
vulnerabilities arising from climate-induced hazards, ecological degradation, gendered inequalities, and  
inadequate institutional support. At the same time, women demonstrate remarkable resilience through diversified  
livelihoods, self-help groups, traditional ecological knowledge, and collective adaptation. The study argues that  
enhancing women’s access to education, healthcare, financial resources, and decision-making spaces is crucial  
for advancing gender equity and ecological sustainability in the Sundarbans.  
Keywords: Sundarbans, women’s livelihoods, climate vulnerability, gender equity, resilience, self-help groups  
INTRODUCTION  
The Sundarbans, spanning the southern part of Bangladesh and eastern India, constitutes the largest contiguous  
mangrove forest on the planet, covering approximately 10,000 sq. km. Designated as a UNESCO World Heritage  
Site, the region is ecologically significant for biodiversity and socio-economically vital for communities reliant  
on its natural resources. Women in the Sundarbans play crucial roles in sustaining households through  
agricultural labor, aquaculture, forest product collection, and domestic care work.  
Yet their lives are marked by vulnerability. Environmental degradation, recurrent cyclones (Aila 2009; Amphan  
2020; Yaas 2021), salinity intrusion, and land erosion intersect with patriarchal structures to compound  
marginalization (Dasgupta & Huq, 2016). Despite these challenges, women demonstrate resilience through  
diversified livelihoods and collective mobilization.  
This study seeks to document women’s livelihood patterns, constraints, and adaptive strategies, contributing to  
broader debates on gender, ecology, and climate justice.  
METHODOLOGY  
Study Area  
The research was conducted in selected blocks of the Indian Sundarbans, primarily Gosaba, Basanti, Kultali, and  
Namkhana, located in South 24 Parganas district. These areas represent varying degrees of exposure to cyclones,  
salinity, and migration pressures.  
Research Design  
A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews and  
observations.  
Page 4208  
Sampling  
Sample size: 120 women respondents  
Sampling method: Stratified purposive sampling to ensure representation from agricultural households,  
aquaculture workers, forest-dependent families, and SHG members.  
Age group: 1860 years  
Data Collection Tools  
Structured questionnaires  
Semi-structured interviews  
Focus group discussions (FGDs) with women’s SHGs  
Field observations  
Review of government reports, NGO documents, and academic literature  
Data Analysis  
Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were coded thematically and  
triangulated with secondary sources.  
Ethical Considerations  
Informed consent was obtained from all respondents. Identities have been anonymized.  
Socio-Economic Background  
The Indian Sundarbans economy is characterized by subsistence agriculture, fishing, aquaculture, daily wage  
labor, and forest-based livelihoods. According to Raha and Mahapatra (2021), nearly 85% of households depend  
on multiple livelihood sources due to environmental uncertainties. Literacy remains below the state average,  
especially among women, limiting their access to formal employment and financial resources.  
Gender relations are institutionally shaped by patriarchal norms, where women manage domestic responsibilities  
while participating extensively in productive work that is often unpaid or underpaid.  
FINDINGS  
Women’s Livelihood Roles  
Agriculture  
Women perform seed selection, sowing, transplanting, weeding, and post-harvest activities. Increased soil  
salinity following cyclones has reduced paddy productivity, forcing shifts to salt-tolerant crops such as mung  
beans and sunflower (Ghosh, 2019). Women also manage homestead gardens and livestock, essential buffers  
during crop loss.  
Aquaculture and Fishing  
Thousands of women collect shrimp post-larvae, engage in crab fattening, or participate in fish drying. Survey  
results indicate:  
42% of respondents involved in shrimp seed collection  
Page 4209  
28% in crab-related work  
36% in fish processing  
However, exposure to saline water causes chronic skin infections and reproductive health issues.  
Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)  
While men dominate honey collection expeditions, women handle honey processing and marketing. Firewood  
and leaf collection remain common despite legal restrictions, highlighting livelihoodconservation tensions.  
Cottage Industries  
Mat weaving (madur), kantha embroidery, and basket weaving are practiced widely. NGO-supported  
cooperatives have increased market access, raising women’s earnings from an average ₹600 to ₹1,800 per month  
(field survey, 2024).  
Challenges Faced by Women  
Environmental Vulnerability  
Cyclones have destroyed embankments, homes, croplands, and freshwater sources. Women, often left behind  
during male migration, shoulder additional responsibilities in crisis recovery.  
Health and Nutrition  
Survey data reveal:  
62% of women suffer from anemia  
48% report chronic back pain or joint issues  
Only 22% have access to nearby health facilities  
These issues are exacerbated by long work hours and exposure to saline environments.  
Education and Decision-Making Barriers  
Only 38% of surveyed women had completed secondary education.  
Less than 10% had direct involvement in local governance bodies.  
Early marriage and household labor contribute significantly to school dropout rates among girls.  
Migration and Feminization of Responsibility  
Male out-migration has increased women’s workload in managing farms, finances, and childcare. Although this  
expands their roles, limited institutional support restricts transformative empowerment.  
Policy Exclusion  
Despite government schemes (MGNREGS, NRLM, ICZMP), lack of infrastructure, bureaucratic delays, and  
weak gender-sensitive implementation hinder women’s participation.  
Page 4210  
Resilience and Adaptation Strategies  
Income Diversification  
Most women combine agriculture, aquaculture, and handicrafts to reduce risk exposure.  
Role of SHGs  
SHGs in Gosaba and Namkhana have improved access to microcredit, enabling small enterprises such as  
mushroom cultivation and poultry farming. Members report increased decision-making power (Ghosh, 2019).  
Traditional Ecological Knowledge  
Women maintain knowledge of mangrove species, medicinal plants, and fish cycles, contributing to household  
food security.  
Disaster Preparedness  
NGO-trained women demonstrate stronger awareness of evacuation procedures, first aid, and community-level  
risk management.  
Digital Inclusion  
Mobile-based weather alerts and market information have improved planning and reduced livelihood  
uncertainty.  
DISCUSSION: TOWARD GENDERED ECOLOGICAL JUSTICE  
The findings illustrate that women’s vulnerabilities arise from an intersection of ecological hazards, socio-  
economic marginalization, restricted mobility, and gendered labor divisions. Yet women are also central actors  
in local adaptation and environmental stewardship. A framework of gendered ecological justice demands:  
Recognition of women’s unpaid labor  
Equitable access to land, credit, health, and education  
Inclusion of women in climate adaptation and resource governance  
Support for community-led and women-led resilience initiatives  
Policy interventions must therefore shift from welfare-based approaches to rights-based, participatory models.  
LIMITATIONS  
The study relies partly on self-reported data, which may contain recall bias.  
Seasonal variations in livelihood patterns were not captured due to time constraints.  
Some remote islands were inaccessible, limiting geographical coverage.  
Quantitative data remain modest; future studies should incorporate larger surveys or longitudinal designs.  
CONCLUSION  
Women in the Sundarbans embody resilience amid profound ecological and socio-economic challenges. Their  
contributions to agricultural work, aquaculture, forest product management, and household sustenance are  
indispensable. For sustainable and equitable development, policies must prioritize:  
Page 4211  
Women’s education and literacy  
Access to credit, land rights, and financial inclusion  
Climate-resilient infrastructure and health services  
Participation in local governance and conservation planning  
As UNESCO (2022) notes, the future of the Sundarbans depends on both ecological conservation and social  
inclusion. Empowering women as central stakeholdersnot peripheral beneficiariesis essential for building  
a resilient and sustainable delta.  
REFERENCES  
1. Ghosh, A. (2019). Women and Livelihood in the Indian Sundarbans: Challenges and Opportunities.  
Journal of Rural Development Studies, 45(3), 211226.  
2. Raha, A. K., & Mahapatra, B. (2021). Gender, climate change and livelihood: Case studies from the  
Sundarbans. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(12), 4451.  
3. Dasgupta, S., & Huq, M. (2016). Environmental threats and women’s vulnerability in the Sundarbans  
(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7764).  
4. Mukhopadhyay, S. (2018). Women, Ecology and Development: A Study of the Indian Sundarbans.  
Kolkata: Naya Udyog Publications.  
5. UNESCO. (2022). The Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve: Human and Ecological Dimensions. Paris:  
UNESCO.  
6. Ahsan, D. A. (2014). Women’s roles in the Bangladesh Sundarbans: A gender-based perspective on  
resource collection and livelihood vulnerability. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 7684.  
7. Bera, S., & Saha, S. (2019). Climate change, livelihood vulnerability, and migration: Evidence from the  
Indian Sundarbans. Environmental Development, 32, 100118.  
8. Chacraverti, S. (2015). The Sundarbans: Folk deities, monsters and mortals. Niyogi Books.  
9. Danda, A. A. (2010). Climate change in the Sundarbans: Drivers, trends and policy responses. Journal  
of the Indian Ocean Region, 6(2), 135150.  
10. Hazra, S., Ghosh, T., Dasgupta, R., & Sen, G. (2016). Sea level rise and vulnerability of the Sundarbans:  
A geospatial assessment. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 20, 114.  
11. Hoque, M. A., Das, S. K., & Parvin, G. A. (2019). Women’s adaptive strategies to cyclone hazards in  
the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, 101250.  
12. Agarwal, B. (2018). Gender equality, food security, and the sustainable development goals. Current  
Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 2632.  
13. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change.  
Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744751.  
14. Dankelman, I. (Ed.). (2010). Gender and climate change: An introduction. Routledge.  
15. Seager, J. (2014). Environmental misogyny: Gender and the global climate justice movement. Routledge.  
16. Banerjee, S., & Sen, S. (2020). Migration, female-headed households, and changing gender roles in the  
Sundarbans. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(3), 453476.  
17. Roy, N. C., & Mondal, A. (2019). Labour migration and livelihood transformation in the Indian  
Sundarbans. Migration and Development, 8(1), 7694.  
18. Taylor, M. (2015). Climate change, migration, and social stability: The challenges to rural livelihoods.  
World Development, 72, 94106.  
19. Kabeer, N. (2005). Is microfinance a ‘magic bullet’ for women’s empowerment? Analysis of South Asian  
experiences. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(4445), 47094718.  
20. Nair, S. (2017). Self-help groups and women’s empowerment in India: A critical analysis. Journal of  
Development Studies, 53(10), 17011716.  
21. Swain, R. B., & Varghese, A. (2009). Does self-help group participation lead to asset creation? World  
Development, 37(10), 16741682.  
22. Bose, S. (2015). Vulnerabilities of women in climate change contexts: A case study from rural West  
Bengal. Gender & Development, 23(3), 475490.  
Page 4212  
23. Sen, A. K. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In T. P. Schultz (Ed.), Persistent inequalities (pp.  
123149). Oxford University Press.  
24. Ghosh, S., & Shah, D. (2021). Health risks and gendered vulnerabilities in saline-prone regions of coastal  
West Bengal. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(4), 047008.  
25. Panda, S. (2016). Women’s collective action and disaster resilience in coastal India. International Journal  
of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 134144.  
26. Sen, S., & Pattanaik, S. (2018). Marginalized identities and ecological vulnerability in coastal India.  
Social Change, 48(2), 223241.  
Page 4213