of financing has gained traction due to its simplicity and accessibility. Lenders accept a variety of gold items,
including jewelry, as collateral for these loans. When individuals opt for glided financing, they offer their gold
assets as security to the lender. The value of the loan is determined based on the purity and weight of the gold
pledged. The gold is securely stored in RBI-approved lockers to ensure its safety throughout the loan tenure.
[2] Recently large numbers of frauds across the banking industry have been reported due to non-observance of
the laid down procedure while processing gold loan. Many times, frauds happen because the branches are
dependent on the assayer for the complete process of the gold loans. This case study is developed to
understand the importance of various guidelines with respect to empanelment of assayer, safety and
operational guideline on sanctioning of gold loan. This will help the branches to follow the preventive
vigilance guidelines issued by the bank from time to time while processing gold loan to avoid occurrence of
frauds and to improve the health of the Bank's credit portfolio. In the reappraisal report it was mentioned that
one packet was found to be of lesser weight due to the missing of one item of gold ornaments vis-à-vis the
appraisal memo. While checking a few more packets were also found loss of weight due to the difference in
the number of articles. Based on the suspicion Branch got re-assayed entire portfolio. It was found that 68 gold
articles totaling 1750 grams in 53 packets are found missing. It was a huge shock for everyone in the branch.
Regional Office reported the matter to Head Office and investigation process started. On further investigation
it was found that at the end of the day, all those jewels that were pledged, which are in the custody of the
Assayer are rechecked by the officers. After the rechecking, the officer handover the jewels to the assayer for
sealing with wax by the assayer and the sealed packets will be handed over to the branch officer to be kept in
the safe custody. During the process of fixing the wax, the assayer use to remove 1 or 2 jewel articles from the
packets. The absence of officers during the sealing of packets, have given the assayer an opportunity to remove
the jewel from the packet. The assayer use to keep the note of jewels which he has taken off from the packets
along with the customer details in his dairy. And also he use to prepare 2 vouchers of Jewel items and hand
over one copy to customer and keep a copy with him for future reference. The assayer use to pledge some of
the stolen jewel articles with the same branch and reported that around 20 loan accounts amounting to Rs.
50.00 Lacs have been opened, based on the security of missing jewels. The borrowers in these loans were
introduced by the assayer. Whenever customers used to come for release of jewels, he would manage the
customer without the knowledge of the branch officials and amicably settle the issues without the intervention
or the knowledge of the branch officials. The assayer also uses to take personnel interest on reverification
process and kept a keen watch on the reappraisal and re-verification process by the bank. After reverification
process is over the branch officials has handed over the unsealed packets to him for packing and waxing of
jewel packets. Utilizing the opportunity, the assayer utilizes the time of absence of officers during the sealing
of packets, after the process of re appraisal, removes the articles from the packets. This was done with the
knowledge that the interval for next reappraisal is 3 months, and the same packets are not taken at a large. The
branch was having only one assayer as per preventive vigilance guidelines branch has failed to engage
minimum two assayer whom to be changed on rotational basis. The branch was fully dependent on the assayer
for the complete process of the gold loans. The branch officials have failed to control on movement of jewelry.
Weighing and verification of gold ornaments must be done by assayer at the branch premises in the presence
of Branch Manager / Officer. The branch officials have failed to verify the weight of jewels and number of
items in the packet after waxing of jewel packets by assayer and taken possession of jewels from assayer
without verification. Jewel loans were sanctioned to the borrowers introduced by assayer without following
proper guidelines. Additional discreet enquiry desired in new cases of jewel loan sanction to ensure ownership
of the ornaments offering for pledge to avail loan facility was not carried out. The branch officials were absent
during the sealing of packets by the assayer. The branch officials had to ensure that immediately after pledge
of ornaments& verification by officer, the jewel loan bag should be transferred to the safe after the details are
entered. Gold packets after appraisal & sealing were not kept in safe custody immediately but left with the
assayer for keeping in safe custody in the evening only. Branch has failed to ensure that if for any reason the
jewels are handed back to the pledger/assayer, they should be appraised once again before accepting them for
keeping in safe custody. On the instruction of the assayer in the guise of the closure of jewel loan accounts
jewel packets were taken out from the safe custody. The branch has failed to check the credibility of every
existing appraiser at branches periodically and ensures to examine the desirability of retaining them
periodically by the Branch Manager. During re-assaying process of the pledged jewelry in the Gold Loan
accounts at each quarter and during RBIA inspection the re-assaying to be carried out involving officials and
assayer of another branch. The branch has involved his branch assayer also during reassaying which he could