Patronage and Power: Women and Royal Queens as Temple Builders  
in Odisha  
Satya Narayana Acharjaya  
Berhampur University, Bhanja Bihar, Berhampur Ganjam, Odisha  
Received: 02 December 2025; Accepted: 08 December 2025; Published: 18 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The architectural and cultural history of Odisha is closely tied to its monumental temples, long regarded as  
symbols of dynastic authority and religious devotion. Conventional scholarship has largely emphasized the role  
of kings and male elites in shaping this sacred landscape, leaving the contributions of royal women in  
comparative obscurity. However, inscriptions, land grants, and temple records reveal that queens and elite  
women were not passive figures confined to domestic or ceremonial roles; rather, they emerged as significant  
patrons whose endowments and commissions left enduring marks on Odisha’s religious and political life.  
This paper examines the agency of royal queens as temple builders in medieval Odisha, focusing on evidence  
from the Bhaumakara, Somavamsi, and Eastern Ganga dynasties. Figures such as Tribhuvana Mahadevi,  
Vakulamahadevi, and Kasturi Devi illustrate how queens employed temple patronage to express devotion, secure  
spiritual merit, and strengthen dynastic prestige. Their involvement demonstrates that temple construction was  
not solely a male domain but a shared arena of authority where women could inscribe their presence into both  
sacred and public spheres.  
By situating female patronage within the broader discourse of power, piety, and memory, this study highlights  
the role of queens as active participants in Odisha’s temple culture. It further contributes to the growing  
scholarship on gender and patronage in South Asia by foregrounding the intersection of women’s agency with  
religion and politics. In recovering these overlooked histories, the paper argues for a more inclusive  
understanding of Odisha’s temple tradition as a product of both male and female power.  
Keywords-Temple patronage, royal queens, women’s agency, Odisha, early medieval period, sacred  
architecture, socio-political authority, cultural heritage  
INTRODUCTION  
The sacred geography of Odisha is renowned for its monumental temples, celebrated for their distinctive Kalinga  
architectural style and deep ritual traditions (Behera, 1993; Bose, 1982). Scholarly narratives of these temples  
have traditionally emphasized the role of kings and dynasties whether the Bhaumakaras, Somavamsis, or Eastern  
Gangas in shaping the region’s cultural and religious landscape (Panigrahi, 1992; Sahu, 2004). In this dynastic  
framework, temple construction is often understood as a prerogative of royal men, while the role of women,  
especially queens, has been relegated to the margins. Yet inscriptions, land charters, and temple records reveal  
that royal women were not passive consorts but active patrons whose contributions left enduring marks on  
Odisha’s sacred landscape (Tripathi, 1995; Sahu, 2013).  
The epigraphic evidence is particularly illuminating. During the Bhaumakara dynasty (8th10th centuries CE),  
a remarkable number of female rulers, including Tribhuvana Mahadevi I and II, are recorded as patrons of  
temples and monasteries (Sahu, 2013). They endowed land for Brahmanas and Buddhist institutions, thereby  
shaping both the political and religious texture of early medieval Odisha. Later, under the Somavamsis (10th–  
11th centuries CE), queens such as Vakulamahadevi are credited with donating land and supporting temple  
activities, their inscriptions affirming both piety and dynastic loyalty (Sahoo, 2006). The Eastern Ganga dynasty  
(11th15th centuries CE) also presents notable examples, such as Queen Kasturi Devi, who is associated with  
Page 1426  
the patronage of temples and religious charities during the reign of Narasimha I, the builder of the Sun Temple  
at Konark (Patel & Pal, 2004; Donaldson, 1985). Such examples demonstrate that temple building was not solely  
a male enterprise; rather, it was a shared arena of power where queens deployed patronage to consolidate dynastic  
prestige and inscribe their authority within the sacred sphere.  
Women’s engagement with temple construction in Odisha was multifaceted. On one level, it reflected deep  
religious devotion and the pursuit of spiritual merit (puṇya) (Panigrahi, 1992). On another, it represented a  
deliberate assertion of agency within a patriarchal political order. Temples offered queens a visible and enduring  
medium through which to reinforce dynastic memory, project political legitimacy, and extend influence beyond  
the palace (Tripathi, 1995). In commissioning temples or endowing land, queens not only participated in the  
religious life of their communities but also engaged in the active negotiation of power, sovereignty, and identity.  
Despite such evidence, the role of women in Odishan temple culture has not received sustained scholarly  
attention. Foundational works by K. C. Panigrahi, R. D. Banerji, and Stella Kramrisch have laid the groundwork  
for understanding Odishan temple architecture, but they largely privilege kingship and stylistic development  
over gendered dimensions of patronage (Panigrahi, 1992; Dehejia, 1979). Recent studies on queenship and  
female agency in South Asia have begun to challenge this male-centered historiography, yet Odisha remains  
relatively underexplored within this discourse (Sahu, 2013).  
Historical and Cultural Context  
Odisha, historically known as Kalinga, Utkala, and Odra, emerged as one of the foremost centres of temple  
architecture in eastern India (Panigrahi, 1992). The evolution of its sacred landscape was shaped by the  
interaction of dynastic politics, religious pluralism, and cultural exchanges (Kulke, 2001). Temples in this region  
were never mere religious monuments; they functioned as markers of royal power, instruments of cultural  
memory, and focal points of social and economic life (Mishra, 2018).  
From the 8th to the 15th centuries CE, Odisha witnessed the rule of several powerful dynasties, most notably the  
Bhaumakaras, Somavamsis, and Eastern Gangas (Panigrahi, 1992; Tripathi, 1967). Each dynasty not only  
patronized monumental temples but also created an environment in which female members of the royal  
household could emerge as influential donors. The Bhaumakaras (c. 8th10th century CE) are particularly  
noteworthy for their remarkable inclusion of women in governance; several queens, such as Tribhuvana  
Mahadevi I, ruled in their own right and extended patronage to both Hindu temples and Buddhist monasteries  
(Mohapatra, 2007). Their reign illustrates the permeability between political authority and religious patronage,  
where queens could exercise sovereignty and sanctify their rule through temple construction and land grants.  
Under the Somavamsis (c. 10th11th century CE), Odisha saw the consolidation of the Kalinga style of temple  
architecture, marked by soaring deulas (sanctum towers) and elaborately sculpted jagamohanas (assembly halls)  
(Kramrisch, 1946). In this period, queens such as Vakulamahadevi appear in epigraphic records as donors of  
land and ritual endowments (Mishra, 2018).  
The Eastern Gangas (c. 11th15th century CE) ushered in the grandest phase of Odishan temple architecture,  
culminating in the Sun Temple at Konark (Banerji, 1931). While male sovereigns particularly Anantavarman  
Chodaganga and Narasimhadeva I were celebrated as great temple builders, inscriptions also point to the  
contributions of royal women such as Queen Kasturi Devi, who endowed temples and supported religious  
charities (Panigrahi, 1992; Dev, 1999). In this era, queens played a vital role in extending dynastic prestige and  
embedding female authority into the sacred geography of the polity.  
Odisha was a confluence of diverse religious traditions Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Shaktism, Buddhism, and  
Jainism each supported by royal and sub-royal patrons (Kulke & Schnepel, 2001). Temples functioned as centres  
of learning, ritual, and economic redistribution, with land grants ensuring their sustainability (Sircar, 1971).  
Female patronage thus intersected with this pluralistic religious environment, allowing queens to exercise agency  
in shaping not only dynastic identity but also the broader spiritual and cultural life of the region. Medieval Odisha  
provided fertile ground for the emergence of royal queens as temple patrons. Dynastic politics, religious  
Page 1427  
diversity, and the centrality of temple institutions created avenues through which women could project power,  
secure spiritual merit, and inscribe their presence into the region’s sacred and social order.  
The Epigraphic Records of Temple Construction  
Epigraphic evidence remains the most direct and tangible source for understanding the role of royal women in  
temple construction in medieval Odisha (Sircar, 1971). Inscriptions on temple walls, copper-plate grants, and  
dedicatory records reveal that queens were not merely symbolic figures but active patrons who shaped the  
religious, cultural, and political landscape through temple endowments, land grants, and ritual oversight  
(Panigrahi, 1992). By examining these records, one can reconstruct the agency of women in both material and  
symbolic terms, highlighting the intersection of devotion, authority, and dynastic legitimacy in temple culture  
(Kulke, 2001).  
Bhaumakara Dynasty (8th10th Century CE)  
The Bhaumakaras are among the earliest Odishan dynasties with recorded female political authority (Tripathi,  
1967). Queens such as Tribhuvana Mahadevi I and Tribhuvana Mahadevi II appear in inscriptions as sovereign  
rulers and temple patrons (Mohapatra, 2007). For example, a 9th-century copper-plate grant records Tribhuvana  
Mahadevi I’s endowment of land for the maintenance of a Buddhist monastery and a Shaiva temple in Jajpur  
(Sircar, 1971). The inscription details the name of the deity, the exact boundaries of the land, and provisions for  
priests, demonstrating the queen’s administrative and ritual involvement. Similarly, stone inscriptions credit  
Tribhuvana Mahadevi II with constructing or renovating shrines and commissioning religious images (Panigrahi,  
1992).  
Somavamsi Dynasty (10th11th Century CE)  
During the Somavamsi period, queens such as Vakulamahadevi were instrumental in temple building and  
endowment (Mishra, 2018). Copper-plate grants and temple inscriptions record donations of land and revenue  
to support daily rituals in newly constructed temples (Sircar, 1971). Inscriptions associated with  
Vakulamahadevi document her role in the construction of deulas (sanctums) and jagamohanas (assembly halls),  
along with allocation of resources for sculptural decoration and temple maintenance (Kramrisch, 1946). These  
records highlight that queens’ patronage was not merely symbolic but involved systematic planning and the  
provision of material, human, and ritual resources necessary for sustaining temple life over generations (Mishra,  
2018).  
Eastern Ganga Dynasty (11th15th Century CE)  
The Eastern Gangas oversaw the pinnacle of Odishan temple architecture, including the construction of the Sun  
Temple at Konark and the expansion of the Jagannath Temple at Puri (Banerji, 1931). While male rulers such as  
Anantavarman Chodaganga and Narasimhadeva I are often celebrated as primary patrons, epigraphic records  
demonstrate that queens such as Kasturi Devi and other royal women actively contributed to temple construction  
and ritual endowments (Panigrahi, 1992; Dev, 1999). Inscriptions indicate their donations of land, gold, and  
ritual paraphernalia, and in some cases record their involvement in deity consecration or temple festivals (Kulke  
& Schnepel, 2001).  
Patronage As Power and Devotion  
Temple patronage in medieval Odisha was a complex practice that intertwined religious devotion with political  
authority (Kulke, 2001). For royal queens, commissioning temples and making endowments was not merely an  
expression of personal piety but also a strategic exercise of influence, enabling them to assert authority, secure  
dynastic legitimacy, and leave a lasting mark on the sacred and social landscape (Panigrahi, 1992). In this sense,  
patronage functioned simultaneously as a spiritual act and as a tool of political power. Temple patronage in  
Odisha cannot be understood solely as an expression of piety; for royal queens, temple construction and  
endowment represented a sophisticated exercise of power, enabling them to assert authority, perpetuate dynastic  
prestige, and shape the sacred and social landscape (Mishra, 2018).  
Page 1428  
Religious Merit and Devotion  
Inscriptions and temple records frequently emphasize the spiritual motivations behind queens’ patronage (Sircar,  
1971). Acts of endowment whether the construction of a sanctum, the donation of land, or the provision of ritual  
paraphernalia were framed in terms of accruing puṇya (spiritual merit) for the queen, her family, and the dynasty.  
For instance, copper-plate inscriptions of Tribhuvana Mahadevi I describe her temple grants as acts ensuring  
both personal salvation and the continued prosperity of the kingdom (Mohapatra, 2007).  
Assertion of Political Authority  
Temple patronage also served as a medium through which queens could assert political presence and influence.  
By commissioning temples, allocating resources, and overseeing ritual observances, queens visibly inscribed  
their authority into the urban and rural landscape (Tripathi, 1967). In the Bhaumakara and Somavamsi periods,  
inscriptions depict queens not only as donors but as organizers of religious institutions, granting them a quasi-  
sovereign role in the administration of temple lands and rituals (Panigrahi, 1992). Through these acts, female  
patrons projected dynastic legitimacy, consolidated alliances, and negotiated their position within the male-  
dominated power structures of the court (Kulke & Schnepel, 2001).  
Dynastic Prestige and Cultural Memory  
The strategic dimension of patronage is also evident in the emphasis on commemorating queens’ contributions  
in inscriptions and temple iconography. Temples endowed by queens were not merely devotional sites but  
monuments to dynastic continuity and prestige (Banerji, 1931). Through these commemorative practices, royal  
women inscribed themselves into the cultural memory of the polity, ensuring that their contributions remained  
visible across generations (Dev, 1999).  
Interplay of Devotion and Power  
In Odisha, the act of temple patronage illustrates the inseparability of spiritual and political objectives. While  
devotion provided legitimacy for female agency, the tangible benefits of patronage control over resources,  
influence over religious institutions, and recognition in epigraphic records strengthened the queen’s social and  
political position (Mishra, 2018). This dual function underscores the unique position of royal women in Odishan  
temple culture: as spiritual intermediaries, administrators, and custodians of dynastic memory (Panigrahi, 1992).  
Architectural and Cultural Impact  
The temple-building activities of royal queens in Odisha had profound architectural and cultural repercussions.  
Their patronage not only contributed to the physical development of sacred structures but also shaped religious  
practices, social hierarchies, and regional identity. By commissioning temples, endowing rituals, and supporting  
associated institutions, queens left an enduring imprint on the Kalinga architectural idiom and the broader  
cultural landscape.  
Influence on Architecture  
Queens’ patronage often translated into tangible architectural contributions. Inscriptions and records show that  
queens were involved in commissioning deulas (sanctums), jagamohanas (assembly halls), and subsidiary  
shrines. For instance, Vakulamahadevi of the Somavamsi dynasty is credited with endowing temples whose  
layouts reflected the emerging Kalinga style, characterized by intricate stone carvings, towering spires, and  
elaborately sculpted assembly halls. Similarly, queens of the Eastern Ganga dynasty, such as Kasturi Devi,  
funded the construction of shrines and subsidiary structures that enhanced both the grandeur and functionality  
of temples like the Jagannath Temple at Puri. By providing resources for stonework, iconography, and ritual  
infrastructure, these women played a direct role in the evolution of Odishan temple architecture.  
Page 1429  
Cultural and Ritual Contributions  
Beyond the structural realm, queens’ patronage shaped the religious and cultural life of temple communities.  
Donations often included land, wealth, or items to sustain daily rituals, festivals, and charitable activities,  
ensuring the continuity of sacred practices. For example, endowments by Tribhuvana Mahadevi I provided for  
the performance of specific ceremonies and the maintenance of temple staff, reinforcing the temple as both a  
spiritual and socio-economic institution. Through such support, queens facilitated the flourishing of ritual  
traditions, contributed to local cultural cohesion, and strengthened the temple’s role as a hub of learning and  
community interaction.  
Impact on Dynastic and Regional Identity  
Temples funded by queens served as markers of dynastic prestige and instruments of political memory. By  
associating their names with monumental architecture, queens inscribed female authority into the public  
consciousness and reinforced the continuity of dynastic rule. Moreover, these contributions helped define the  
sacred geography of Odisha, creating networks of temples that linked political centers with rural communities  
and integrated spiritual and administrative domains. Through their architectural and cultural interventions,  
queens thus influenced both local identity and the symbolic representation of royal power.  
Legacy and Continuity  
The architectural and cultural imprint of royal queens endures in Odisha’s temple landscape. The combination  
of structural innovation, ritual endowment, and dynastic commemoration ensured that their contributions were  
preserved for generations. These acts illustrate that female patronage was not peripheral but central to the  
development of Odisha’s sacred architecture, ritual traditions, and cultural memory. Queens were therefore not  
merely supporters of temples; they were active shapers of a living heritage that continues to define the region’s  
religious and artistic identity.Queens' patronage had far-reaching architectural and cultural consequences. By  
funding construction, sustaining rituals, and embedding their authority into sacred spaces, royal women played  
a crucial role in shaping the physical and cultural landscape of medieval Odisha, leaving a legacy that reflects  
the intertwined nature of devotion, power, and artistic innovation.  
CONCLUSION  
The exploration of queens as temple patrons in medieval Odisha underscores the multifaceted role of women in  
shaping the region’s sacred, cultural, and political landscape. Far from being peripheral figures, royal women  
such as Tribhuvana Mahadevi, Vakulamahadevi, and Kasturi Devi exercised considerable agency,  
commissioning temples, endowing land, and sustaining rituals that intertwined spiritual devotion with dynastic  
authority. Epigraphic records and architectural evidence demonstrate that their patronage was both deliberate  
and enduring, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of the interplay between power, piety, and cultural  
memory.  
Through temple construction and endowments, queens asserted political influence, consolidated dynastic  
legitimacy, and embedded their presence within the social and religious fabric of Odisha. Their contributions  
also had profound architectural and cultural implications: they shaped the evolution of the Kalinga style, ensured  
the continuity of ritual practices, and fostered networks of sacred institutions that reinforced regional identity.  
In doing so, they redefined the boundaries of female authority within a predominantly male-dominated political  
and religious framework.This study highlights the inseparability of devotion and power in royal female  
patronage, demonstrating that temples were not merely religious monuments but instruments of cultural  
production, political negotiation, and social memory.  
Ultimately, the legacy of these royal women endures in stone and ritual, reminding us that the history of temple  
building in Odisha is as much a history of female power, vision, and devotion as it is of kingship. Their patronage  
serves as a testament to the central role women played in the creation, sustenance, and transformation of Odishan  
religious and cultural heritage.  
Page 1430  
REFERENCES  
1. Panigrahi, K. C. History of Orissa. 2nd ed. Cuttack: Vidyapuri, 1992.  
2. Sahu, S. K. History and Culture of Orissa. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House, 2004.  
3. Tripathi, R. C., ed. Studies in the History and Culture of Orissa. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal  
Publishers, 1995.  
4. Sahu, S. K. “Shaktism During Bhaumakaras Period: An Epigraphical Study.” Orissa Review, October  
2013.  
5. Patel, C. B., and Bharati Pal. “The Newly Discovered Three Sets of Svetaka Ganga Copper Plates.”  
Orissa Historical Research Journal 47, no. 3 (2004): 4048.  
6. Sahoo, P. K. “The Patlinga Copper Plate Grant Inscription of Dandi Mahadevi.” Orissa Review, June  
2006.  
7. Behera, K. S. Temples of Orissa. Bhubaneswar: Orissa State Museum, 1993.  
8. Bose, N. K. Canon of Orissan Architecture. Calcutta: Indian Studies, 1982.  
9. Donaldson, T. E. The Hindu Temple of Orissa. New Delhi: American Institute of Indian Studies, 1985.  
10. Dehejia, Vidya. Early Stone Temples of Orissa. New Delhi: American Institute of Indian Studies, 1979.  
Page 1431