the patronage of temples and religious charities during the reign of Narasimha I, the builder of the Sun Temple
at Konark (Patel & Pal, 2004; Donaldson, 1985). Such examples demonstrate that temple building was not solely
a male enterprise; rather, it was a shared arena of power where queens deployed patronage to consolidate dynastic
prestige and inscribe their authority within the sacred sphere.
Women’s engagement with temple construction in Odisha was multifaceted. On one level, it reflected deep
religious devotion and the pursuit of spiritual merit (puṇya) (Panigrahi, 1992). On another, it represented a
deliberate assertion of agency within a patriarchal political order. Temples offered queens a visible and enduring
medium through which to reinforce dynastic memory, project political legitimacy, and extend influence beyond
the palace (Tripathi, 1995). In commissioning temples or endowing land, queens not only participated in the
religious life of their communities but also engaged in the active negotiation of power, sovereignty, and identity.
Despite such evidence, the role of women in Odishan temple culture has not received sustained scholarly
attention. Foundational works by K. C. Panigrahi, R. D. Banerji, and Stella Kramrisch have laid the groundwork
for understanding Odishan temple architecture, but they largely privilege kingship and stylistic development
over gendered dimensions of patronage (Panigrahi, 1992; Dehejia, 1979). Recent studies on queenship and
female agency in South Asia have begun to challenge this male-centered historiography, yet Odisha remains
relatively underexplored within this discourse (Sahu, 2013).
Historical and Cultural Context
Odisha, historically known as Kalinga, Utkala, and Odra, emerged as one of the foremost centres of temple
architecture in eastern India (Panigrahi, 1992). The evolution of its sacred landscape was shaped by the
interaction of dynastic politics, religious pluralism, and cultural exchanges (Kulke, 2001). Temples in this region
were never mere religious monuments; they functioned as markers of royal power, instruments of cultural
memory, and focal points of social and economic life (Mishra, 2018).
From the 8th to the 15th centuries CE, Odisha witnessed the rule of several powerful dynasties, most notably the
Bhaumakaras, Somavamsis, and Eastern Gangas (Panigrahi, 1992; Tripathi, 1967). Each dynasty not only
patronized monumental temples but also created an environment in which female members of the royal
household could emerge as influential donors. The Bhaumakaras (c. 8th–10th century CE) are particularly
noteworthy for their remarkable inclusion of women in governance; several queens, such as Tribhuvana
Mahadevi I, ruled in their own right and extended patronage to both Hindu temples and Buddhist monasteries
(Mohapatra, 2007). Their reign illustrates the permeability between political authority and religious patronage,
where queens could exercise sovereignty and sanctify their rule through temple construction and land grants.
Under the Somavamsis (c. 10th–11th century CE), Odisha saw the consolidation of the Kalinga style of temple
architecture, marked by soaring deulas (sanctum towers) and elaborately sculpted jagamohanas (assembly halls)
(Kramrisch, 1946). In this period, queens such as Vakulamahadevi appear in epigraphic records as donors of
land and ritual endowments (Mishra, 2018).
The Eastern Gangas (c. 11th–15th century CE) ushered in the grandest phase of Odishan temple architecture,
culminating in the Sun Temple at Konark (Banerji, 1931). While male sovereigns particularly Anantavarman
Chodaganga and Narasimhadeva I were celebrated as great temple builders, inscriptions also point to the
contributions of royal women such as Queen Kasturi Devi, who endowed temples and supported religious
charities (Panigrahi, 1992; Dev, 1999). In this era, queens played a vital role in extending dynastic prestige and
embedding female authority into the sacred geography of the polity.
Odisha was a confluence of diverse religious traditions Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Shaktism, Buddhism, and
Jainism each supported by royal and sub-royal patrons (Kulke & Schnepel, 2001). Temples functioned as centres
of learning, ritual, and economic redistribution, with land grants ensuring their sustainability (Sircar, 1971).
Female patronage thus intersected with this pluralistic religious environment, allowing queens to exercise agency
in shaping not only dynastic identity but also the broader spiritual and cultural life of the region. Medieval Odisha
provided fertile ground for the emergence of royal queens as temple patrons. Dynastic politics, religious
Page 1427