Uncovering the Human Resource Development Practices in Northern  
Mindanao: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis  
Woodrow Wilson B. Merida  
Department of Education-Division of Malaybalay City, Capitol University, Philippines  
Received: 01 December 2025; Accepted: 07 December 2025; Published: 18 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
This study explored human resource development (HRD) practices within the Department of Education (DepEd)  
Northern Mindanao, emphasizing the lived experiences of HRD specialists in implementing professional  
development initiatives. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), data were collected from 13  
purposively selected HRD specialists. Open-ended questions examined HRD practices, professional  
development needs, challenges in implementation, and program effectiveness. The coding and thematic analysis  
process revealed a structured framework encompassing leadership, well-being, technological skills,  
collaboration, and opportunities for advanced education. Key challenges included limited funding, inadequate  
staffing, resource accessibility issues, and inefficient organizational processes. Effective evaluation strategies  
highlighted measurable improvements in skills, competencies, and job performance among educators. The  
findings stress the critical need for prioritizing HRD programs to align with school division goals. With this,  
Schools Division Superintendents are urged to allocate sufficient resources, staffing, and materials to enhance  
the delivery and impact of professional development initiatives.  
Keywords: HRD practices, assessment, challenges, and interpretative phenomenological analysis  
INTRODUCTION  
Human Resource Development (HRD) practices in the education sector are critical for ensuring the continuous  
improvement of teaching and administrative staff, ultimately enhancing the quality of education provided to  
students. Common HRD practices in the education sector include professional development programs,  
performance evaluations, and capacity-building initiatives (Keltu, 2024). These programs aim to develop the  
competencies of teachers, school heads, and administrative staff, ensuring that they remain effective in delivering  
quality education (DepEd Order No. 024, 2020). Additionally, many education sectors have adopted mentoring  
systems (Bowman, 2014) peer reviews Keinänenet et al. (2023), and workshops (Buabeng-Andoh, 2012) to align  
individual goals with institutional objectives.  
One of the pressing issues in HRD in the education sector is the overlapping of activities, where various programs  
or training sessions overlap in schedule or content, leading to inefficiencies. For instance, teachers often attend  
multiple seminars and workshops within the same academic year, many of which cover similar topics (Ayagbil  
& Alda, 2024). This results in redundancy, reduced effectiveness of the training, and wasted resources. Another  
common issue is the assignment of functions not related to the Key Result Areas (KRA) of personnel, especially  
teachers. Many teachers are burdened with tasks unrelated to their core teaching responsibilities, such as  
administrative work, event organizing, or extracurricular activities (Arañas, 2023). These additional tasks detract  
from the time and energy teachers could devote to instructional planning, student engagement, and professional  
growth.  
Essentially, undermanning in the HRD departments is another significant concern. Many divisions in the  
education sector face a shortage of HRD personnel relative to the increasing number of employees that need  
development and training (Tanjung, 2020). This imbalance often results in delays in the implementation of  
professional development programs and inadequate support for educators. The organizational structure of the  
education sector at the regional level is not always align with the number of HRD personnel available at the  
Page 1432  
division level. For example, studies have highlighted discrepancies in staffing, with regions often being better  
resourced than divisions, leading to challenges in adequately addressing personnel needs at the local level  
(UNESCO, 2019; DepEd, 2021). There is often a disproportionate allocation of HRD personnel, with regions  
receiving more HRD resources compared to divisions, even though divisions handle a larger number of  
employees directly (García, & Weiss, 2017). This lack of equitable distribution of resources results in divisions  
struggling to meet the professional development needs of their staff, creating a bottleneck in the system.  
Uncovering HRD practices in the education sector is essential for the continuous improvement of the workforce.  
However, despite the growing body of research on HRD, there is a noticeable gap in studies focusing on the  
specific challenges faced in the context of Northern Mindanao. Issues such as overlapping activities, tasks  
unrelated to Key Result Areas (KRAs), understaffing, and misalignment within the organizational structure have  
been identified as challenges that impact effectiveness in various regions. For example, a study conducted by  
the Civil Service Commission (CSC) revealed that overlapping functions within government agencies often lead  
to inefficiencies in service delivery (CSC, 2020). Additionally, a report by the Department of Education (DepEd)  
highlighted the misallocation of tasks not aligned with KRAs, contributing to staff burnout and reduced  
productivity (DepEd, 2021). Undermanning has also been cited in regions where the teacher-to-student ratio  
remains high, limiting the ability to meet educational targets effectively (UNESCO, 2019).  
To address this research gap, this study intended to explore and analyze the HRD practices in the education  
sector in Northern Mindanao, aiming to provide insights that can help mitigate these issues and enhance  
workforce development in this specific regional context.  
Conceptual Model  
INPUT  
ACTIVITIES  
OUTPUT  
Conduct Needs  
Assessment for  
professional  
development  
programs  
HRD Specialists’  
Expertise and  
Practices  
Enhanced Teacher  
Skills, Competencies,  
and Job Performance  
This conceptual model illustrates the flow of human resource development within the Department of Education  
(DepEd) Northern Mindanao, emphasizing how HRD specialists’ expertise and practices serve as the  
foundational input for implementing professional development initiatives. These inputs drive the core activity  
of conducting needs assessments, which allows HRD specialists to identify priority areas, capability gaps, and  
learning requirements among teachers. Through this systematic assessment process, appropriate professional  
development programs are designed and delivered. The resulting output reflects enhanced teacher skills,  
competencies, and job performance, demonstrating how the effective application of HRD specialists’ expertise  
leads to meaningful improvements in instructional quality and professional growth across schools.  
Research Questions  
The objective of the study was to uncover the human resource development practices in the Department of  
Education in Northern Mindanao.  
Specifically, this paper sought to answer the following questions:  
1. What are the HRD practices implemented by HRD specialists in the school division offices?  
2. How do HRD specialists assess the professional development needs of teachers and non-teaching staff?  
Page 1433  
3. What challenges do HRD specialists encounter in implementing HRD programs and initiatives?  
4. How do HRD specialists evaluate the effectiveness of HRD programs in enhancing the skills and  
competencies of educators?  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
This section reviews relevant literature from a variety of sources with the goal of uncovering key human resource  
development practices and their impact on workforce improvement.  
HRD Practices in Dep ED  
In the Department of Education (DepEd) divisions in the Philippines, HRD specialists implement a range of  
practices designed to enhance the professional growth and effectiveness of teaching and non-teaching personnel.  
One of the key HRD practices is the Learning and Development (L&D) system, which includes workshops,  
seminars, and training programs focused on pedagogy, leadership, and administrative skills. These programs are  
designed to address the competencies outlined in the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) and  
the National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads (NCBS-SH), ensuring that teachers and school  
leaders are equipped to meet the evolving demands of the education system (DepEd Order No.42, 2017). The  
L&D system is often customized to the needs of the division, with specialists conducting Training Needs  
Assessments (TNA) to identify priority areas for professional development.  
HRD specialists also facilitate the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS), which aligns  
individual performance with organizational goals. Through RPMS, teachers and administrative staff undergo  
regular evaluations, allowing HRD personnel to monitor progress and provide targeted support to improve  
performance. This practice promotes accountability and ensures that personnel are consistently working towards  
achieving the Key Result Areas (KRAs) relevant to their roles. Additionally, the RPMS process is complemented  
by coaching and mentoring programs, where more experienced staff provide guidance and support to less  
experienced colleagues, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and collaboration (Llego, 2021).  
To address emerging challenges in the digital age, DepEd HRD specialists have also integrated ICT-based  
professional development programs. These initiatives include training in digital literacy, online teaching  
strategies, and the use of DepEd’s Learning Management System (LMS) to ensure that teachers are equipped to  
handle blended learning and remote teaching modalities. These ICT-based programs have become especially  
crucial during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, as teachers and learners alike have had to adapt to new modes  
of teaching and learning. The HRD efforts in this area reflect a commitment to modernizing the education  
workforce and ensuring their readiness for a technology-driven environment (DepEd, 2022).  
Assessment of the Professional Development Needs  
HRD specialists assess the professional development needs of teachers and non-teaching staff through Training  
Needs Assessments (TNA) and competency evaluations. This process helps identify specific areas where  
teachers and administrative personnel require further development, ensuring that training programs are aligned  
with the actual needs of the workforce. Based on the TNA results, HRD specialists design and implement  
targeted professional development initiatives such as workshops, in-service training, and coaching sessions.  
These initiatives are often focused on improving teaching strategies, leadership skills, and administrative  
competencies to enhance overall educational outcomes (Corpuz, 2020).  
In addition to these assessments, HRD specialists facilitate continuous learning and mentoring programs to  
support both new and experienced personnel. These programs create opportunities for peer collaboration and  
knowledge-sharing, helping individuals enhance their skills over time. Mentorship, particularly, plays a critical  
role in guiding newly hired teachers and staff, allowing them to acclimate to their roles and improve their  
performance through direct, practical support from more seasoned colleagues. This approach ensures that  
personnel development is not a one-time event but an ongoing process integrated into the workplace culture (Hill  
et al., 2022).  
Page 1434  
Moreover, HRD specialists also incorporate performance management systems such as the Results-Based  
Performance Management System (RPMS) to evaluate individual progress. These evaluations are based on key  
competencies and responsibilities, allowing specialists to monitor growth and identify further development  
opportunities. Through RPMS, performance gaps can be addressed by designing personalized interventions or  
additional training to ensure that every staff member is equipped to meet both their individual Key Result Areas  
(KRAs) and the organizational goals (Llego, 2021).  
Challenges in Implementing HRD Programs and Initiatives  
HRD specialists within the Department of Education (DepEd) encounter several challenges in implementing  
HRD programs and initiatives, particularly in terms of resource limitations. A primary challenge is budget  
constraints, as many divisions face insufficient funding to fully execute training programs and development  
initiatives for teaching and non-teaching personnel. This limits their ability to provide comprehensive training  
opportunities, especially in remote areas where logistical costs for organizing workshops, seminars, and other  
professional development activities are significantly higher (DepEd Order, 2022). As a result, some schools did  
not receive equal access to quality HRD programs, leading to disparities in professional growth opportunities  
across different regions.  
Another challenge is overlapping responsibilities and administrative workload, which often distracts teachers  
and non-teaching staff from fully participating in professional development programs. HRD specialists often  
struggle to schedule training sessions that accommodate the busy workloads of educators, who are frequently  
tasked with administrative duties beyond their teaching roles (Tarraya, 2024). Additionally, HRD specialists  
themselves were overburdened, handling multiple roles that prevent them from focusing entirely on HRD  
activities. This can lead to delays in the implementation of programs and hinder the effectiveness of HRD  
initiatives.  
Furthermore, resistance to change and lack of engagement are significant challenges in the implementation of  
HRD programs. Teachers and staff sometimes were reluctant to adopt new methods or participate in training due  
to a lack of motivation, skepticism about the relevance of the training, or comfort with established routines  
(Gorospe & Edaniol, 2022). HRD specialists must work to overcome this resistance by demonstrating the  
benefits of these programs, providing incentives, and fostering a culture of continuous learning and  
improvement. Effective communication and strong leadership support are essential in mitigating this challenge  
and encouraging active participation in HRD initiatives.  
Evaluation of HRD Programs  
HRD specialists evaluate the effectiveness of HRD programs by using various assessment tools and  
methodologies to determine how well these programs enhance the skills and competencies of teachers. One of  
the most commonly used approaches is the Kirkpatrick Model, which evaluates training outcomes at four levels:  
reaction (participants’ feedback), learning (knowledge gained), behavior (changes in job performance), and  
results (impact on organizational goals) (Llego, 2021). Specialists collect data through surveys, tests, and  
performance reviews to measure how effectively the training programs have improved teachers’ competencies  
in areas such as instructional strategies, classroom management, and leadership skills.  
In addition to formal evaluation models, HRD specialists often rely on performance appraisals and feedback  
mechanisms, such as the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS), to assess how professional  
development programs translate into better teaching practices and student outcomes. These systems track  
teachers' performance based on key indicators aligned with their Key Result Areas (KRAs) and provide ongoing  
feedback through classroom observations, mentoring, and coaching (Sugot & Ladia, 2024). By continuously  
monitoring and adjusting HRD initiatives, specialists ensure that training programs are responsive to the  
evolving needs of educators and contribute meaningfully to their professional growth.  
In synthesis, the related studies on HRD practices in the education sector highlight the importance of structured  
professional development programs, such as the Learning and Development (L&D) system and the Results-  
Based Performance Management System (RPMS), in enhancing the skills and competencies of teachers and  
Page 1435  
non-teaching staff. However, challenges such as budget constraints, overlapping responsibilities, and resistance  
to change hinder the full implementation of these initiatives. HRD specialists utilize various evaluation methods,  
including the Kirkpatrick Model and 360-degree feedback, to assess the effectiveness of these programs. Despite  
these efforts, gaps remain, particularly in addressing issues such as the mismatch between organizational  
structures and HRD personnel allocation, as well as the need for more region-specific research, especially in  
areas like Northern Mindanao, to tailor HRD practices effectively to local needs.  
The insights from the analysis of HRD practices in DepEd divisions emphasize the integral role of structured  
systems such as the Learning and Development (L&D) system and the Results-Based Performance Management  
System (RPMS) in cultivating professional growth among teaching and non-teaching personnel. These initiatives  
align with national competency standards, ensuring teaching and non-teaching staff are equipped to meet  
evolving demands, particularly in areas like ICT and blended learning. However, significant challenges such as  
budget constraints, workload pressures, and resistance to change hinder the full potential of these programs.  
Effective solutions include tailored training through needs assessments, mentorship, and evaluation models like  
the Kirkpatrick Model to ensure alignment with organizational goals and sustained professional improvement.  
The findings indicate the need for equitable access to resources, stronger leadership support, and region-specific  
adaptations to bridge gaps and optimize HRD initiatives across diverse educational contexts.  
METHODOLOGY  
Research Design  
This study employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to explore the lived experiences of HRD  
specialists in implementing human resource development practices within the Divisions of DepEd Northern  
Mindanao. IPA is an approach that focuses on understanding how individuals make sense of their personal and  
social worlds (Rajasinghe et al., 2024), making it particularly suited for examining the specific HRD practices  
and experiences of these specialists.  
Central to IPA is its double hermeneutic process, where the researcher sought to interpret how participants make  
meaning of their own experiences. The steps in IPA included collecting rich and detailed data through methods  
like semi-structured interviews, immersing in the data through repeated readings, and making detailed initial  
notes that capture descriptive, linguistic, and conceptual elements. Themes were then developed from the data,  
connected to form overarching patterns, and presented in a narrative account that integrates participants’ quotes  
and researcher interpretations. For multiple participants, cross-case analysis was conducted to identify shared  
patterns and unique perspectives. The findings were then contextualized within broader theoretical and social  
frameworks, providing a comprehensive understanding of the participants’ lived experiences. This process  
ensures a detailed and reflective examination of HRD practices.  
The flexibility of IPA is crucial for examining the diverse, context-specific HRD practices in Northern  
Mindanao. Drawing on Creswell and Poth’s (2018) guidance, semi-structured interviews will be conducted to  
elicit rich, detailed narratives from HRD specialists. Open-ended questions will facilitate in-depth discussions,  
helping to uncover the deeper meanings behind their practices and experiences. The data were analyzed using a  
systematic process of coding and theme development. The analysis focused on both the participants’  
interpretations of their experiences and the researcher’s own insights. Emerging patterns and themes were  
examined within the context of the specialists’ lived experiences, ultimately offering a comprehensive  
understanding of HRD practices in the region.  
Data saturation was carefully monitored throughout the interview process. Saturation was considered reached  
when recurring patterns, themes, and narratives consistently emerged across participant responses, and no new  
substantive insights arose during the final interviews. The repetition of ideas related to HRD practices,  
challenges, and evaluation processes signaled that further data collection was unlikely to contribute additional  
perspectives, thereby supporting the adequacy of the sample size for Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis  
(IPA).  
Page 1436  
To ensure the trustworthiness of the analysis, inter-coder reliability was strengthened through collaborative  
coding sessions among the researchers. Codes were compared, negotiated, and refined to achieve a shared  
understanding of emerging themes. Although a formal statistical reliability index (such as Cohen’s Kappa) was  
not computed due to the qualitative and interpretative nature of IPA, the consensus-building process helped  
enhance consistency and minimize individual bias during thematic interpretation.  
Participants and Sampling Frame  
The sampling frame for this study comprised 13 HRD specialists from various Schools Division Offices within  
DepEd Northern Mindanao, selected through purposive sampling to ensure that participants possessed the  
relevant experience and expertise in implementing HRD practices. Purposive sampling is particularly  
appropriate for phenomenological research, as it targets individuals who have directly engaged with the  
phenomena under investigation (Palinkas et al., 2015). These specialists, drawn from both rural and urban areas,  
offered diverse perspectives on the assessment, implementation, and evaluation of HRD programs, providing a  
comprehensive understanding of the challenges and strategies involved in enhancing educators’ competencies  
in the region.  
The participants represented key HRD functions, including education program supervisors, HRD coordinators,  
division training personnel, and senior education specialists, with varying lengths of service, professional  
backgrounds, and areas of HRD responsibility. While this composition ensured meaningful insights from those  
directly involved in HRD implementation, it did not include school-based HRD focal persons or regional-level  
administrators, which may limit the overall breadth of perspectives captured.  
Instruments  
To address the research questions regarding HRD practices in the Department of Education (DepEd) Northern  
Mindanao, a set of self-structured, open-ended questions were employed. These questions explored the current  
HRD practices implemented by specialists, assessed the professional development needs of both teachers and  
non-teaching staff, identified the challenges faced by HRD specialists in implementing HRD programs, and  
evaluated the effectiveness of these programs in enhancing the skills and competencies of educators. Utilizing  
open-ended questions captured rich, qualitative data that reflects the diverse perspectives and experiences of  
HRD specialists, providing a comprehensive understanding of the HRD landscape within DepEd Northern  
Mindanao. This approach facilitated a deeper exploration of the nuances in HRD practices and their impacts on  
educational outcomes.  
FGD Questions  
Domains  
Can you describe the HRD programs or initiatives currently being implemented in  
your division?  
What specific professional development activities are most commonly offered to  
teachers and non-teaching staff?  
HRD Practices  
How do you tailor these HRD practices to the specific needs of your division?  
How do you assess the professional development needs of teachers and non- teaching  
staff in your division?  
Professional  
Development Needs  
of Teachers and Non-  
Teaching Staff  
What tools or methods do you use to identify areas for improvement?  
Once needs are identified, how do you prioritize and address them through HRD  
initiatives?  
Page 1437  
What challenges do you face in implementing HRD programs within your division?  
Are there any organizational or structural issues that make it difficult to fully  
implement HRD initiatives?  
Challenges in  
Implementing HRD  
Programs and  
Initiatives  
How do you manage overlapping activities or tasks that are outside the Key Result  
Areas (KRAs) of the staff?  
How do you measure the success or effectiveness of the HRD programs in your  
division?  
Evaluation of the  
Effectiveness of HRD  
Programs  
What indicators or metrics do you use to evaluate the improvement in teachers' skills  
and competencies?  
Can you share any examples of how HRD initiatives have led to measurable changes  
in teaching or administrative practices?  
To ensure the validity of the instruments, the questions underwent a validation process involving expert review,  
allowing for necessary adjustments based on feedback to enhance the clarity and relevance of the questions. This  
thorough validation approach contributed to the credibility of the findings and insights derived from the research.  
Data Gathering Procedures  
The data gathering process for this research adopted a systematic approach to ensure comprehensive and reliable  
insights into the human resource development (HRD) practices within the Department of Education (DepEd)  
Northern Mindanao. The process began with securing formal permission from the Office of the Regional  
Director down to Schools Division Superintendents of each division, ensuring ethical compliance and  
institutional support. A set of self-structured, open-ended interview questions was designed, focusing on key  
themes such as current HRD practices, the professional development needs of teachers and non-teaching staff,  
the challenges faced by HRD specialists, and the effectiveness of HRD programs. These questions were validated  
through expert review and pilot testing to ensure clarity, relevance, and depth.  
Once the instrument was finalized, purposive sampling was employed to select HRD specialists from various  
divisions across Northern Mindanao. Data collection was conducted via semi-structured interviews, allowing  
participants to provide detailed, reflective responses about their experiences. Focus group discussions (FGDs)  
were also organized to encourage collaborative dialogue among the specialists, enabling the exploration of  
diverse perspectives and shared insights. Both the interviews and FGDs were recorded, with participants’  
consent, and meticulously transcribed for analysis.  
Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed data to identify recurring themes, patterns, and key insights  
related to HRD practices. This approach provided a nuanced understanding of the challenges and successes in  
HRD implementation across the region, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of HRD strategies in the  
DepEd Northern Mindanao context.  
Data Analysis  
The use of NVivo for data analysis facilitated coding, identifying themes, and exploring relationships within the  
data, making it easier to uncover patterns and gain insights. Thematic analysis was applied to analyze responses  
from interviews and focus group discussions. After transcribing the data, it was organized and reviewed to ensure  
a thorough understanding. Initial coding highlighted key themes, such as current HRD practices, professional  
development needs, challenges, and program effectiveness. These codes were then refined and grouped into  
broader categories to identify recurring themes. This structured approach allowed for meaningful insights into  
HRD practices within DepEd Northern Mindanao.  
Page 1438  
Ethical Considerations  
Ethical considerations were integral to the research process, ensuring integrity and respect for participants’ rights  
and welfare. Permissions were obtained through a structured process, beginning with a formal request to the  
Regional Director, followed by endorsements from the Schools Division Superintendents. Each proposal  
emphasized key ethical principles, including confidentiality, voluntary participation, and informed consent.  
Once approvals were secured, the researcher collaborated with HRD specialists to schedule interviews, ensuring  
compliance with institutional protocols and minimizing disruptions to their duties.  
Before data collection, informed consent was meticulously obtained from all participants, detailing the study’s  
purpose, their right to withdraw at any time, and the measures to safeguard their confidentiality. Participants  
were assured of the anonymity of their responses, which would be used solely for research purposes. The study  
adhered strictly to ethical research guidelines, including transparency about potential conflicts of interest and  
responsible data handling. Throughout the process, sensitivity to participants' feelings and perspectives fostered  
trust and openness. Finally, the findings were disseminated in a manner that honored participants’ contributions,  
enhancing the understanding of HRD practices in the Department of Education (DepEd) Northern Mindanao.  
During the analysis process, attention was given to the context and nuances of the participants’ responses,  
ensuring that the interpretations remained grounded in their experiences. Member checking was conducted,  
allowing participants to review the findings and provide feedback on the accuracy of the interpretations. This  
iterative process enhanced the credibility and validity of the analysis, ultimately leading to a comprehensive  
understanding of HRD practices within DepEd Northern Mindanao. The findings were presented in a narrative  
format, supported by direct quotes from participants to illustrate key points and provide a rich, contextualized  
view of the HRD landscape in the region.  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
This section presents an in-depth analysis and interpretation of the data gathered, emphasizing the nuanced  
experiences, perspectives, and narratives of the participants. Exploring these qualitative dimensions seeks to  
uncover patterns, themes, and insights that offer a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena under  
investigation. The findings are discussed in relation to the research questions, framed within the context of  
relevant literature and theoretical perspectives.  
Problem 1: What are the HRD practices implemented by HRD specialists in the school division offices?  
Matrix 1 describes the current HRD practices implemented by HRD specialists in school division offices have  
highlighted five key themes. These include leadership and management training, which focuses on developing  
leadership and managerial competencies among staff, and staff wellness and mental health support, aimed at  
promoting employee well-being and resilience. Another theme is digital literacy and online learning, which  
emphasizes equipping staff with technological skills essential for modern education. Additionally, peer support  
and mentorship programs foster collaborative learning and professional growth through shared experiences.  
Lastly, financial support for further education provides opportunities for employees to pursue advanced  
studies, enhancing their qualifications and expertise. These themes collectively highlight the comprehensive  
efforts to support and develop human resources in the education sector.  
Matrix 1  
The Selected Significant Responses, Formulated Meaning, and Themes on the Current Practices Implemented  
by HRD Specialists in the School Division Offices  
Selected Significant Responses  
Formulated Meaning  
Themes  
Programs aim to build  
Leadership and  
Management  
Training  
“We have a Leadership Development Program that aims to  
enhance the management and leadership skills of current and  
aspiring school leaders. It covers areas like decision-making,  
management  
and  
leadership skills.  
Page 1439  
conflict  
resolution,  
and  
instructional  
leadership.”  
(Participant 1)  
“Every year, we conduct leadership development programs  
aimed at aspiring leaders. This includes training on  
leadership skills, decision-making, and conflict resolution,  
especially for teachers interested in administrative roles.”  
(Participant 9)  
Plus (11) eleven other responses  
“In our division, we're focusing on wellness programs that  
support mental health. We have workshops on stress  
management, team-building activities, and even access to  
counseling services. This has been beneficial for improving  
staff morale and productivity.” (Participant 2)  
Initiatives  
“Team-building activities are part of our professional improving staff morale and  
development offerings. These activities foster a collaborative productivity through  
environment and help staff build stronger working mental health support and  
focus  
on  
Staff Wellness  
and Mental  
Health Support  
relationships.” (Participant 4)  
fostering collaboration.  
“We also have regular wellness programs. This includes  
stress management workshops for both teaching and non-  
teaching staff, which helps everyone stay mentally healthy  
and productive.” (Participant 5)  
“Digital literacy training has been a priority, especially with  
the shift toward online and blended learning. We provide  
workshops on using learning management systems, digital  
tools, and online resources to help teachers adapt to modern  
teaching requirements.” (Participant 4)  
Training equips teachers  
and staff with digital and Digital Literacy  
data skills to meet modern  
and Online  
Learning  
“Specialized training sessions on blended learning teaching  
approaches help teachers integrate online tools into administrative needs.  
traditional classrooms.” (Participant 10)  
and  
Plus (8) eight other responses  
“We have a Peer Mentorship Program where experienced  
teachers support newer ones. This program fosters a  
supportive environment and allows new teachers to gain  
practical insights and strategies from their more experienced  
colleagues.” (Participant 5)  
Programs promote support  
systems and structured  
Peer Support  
and Mentorship  
Programs  
“Our division offers a Teacher Induction Program for new  
hires. This program covers policies, expectations, and  
teaching standards, which helps teachers adapt to our  
division's culture and ensures a smooth transition.”  
(Participant 11)  
onboarding  
teachers.  
for  
new  
Plus (11) eleven other responses  
“Scholarships and grants are available for our teachers who  
want to further their studies. We encourage staff to pursue  
graduate studies or specialized training, as it benefits their  
Support  
education  
for  
advanced  
encourages  
Financial  
Support for  
Page 1440  
personal growth and our Division’s teaching quality.” personal and professional  
Further  
(Participant 7)  
growth.  
Education  
Plus (12) twelve other responses  
Leadership and Management Training  
In the Department of Education Region X, leadership development initiatives play a vital role in fostering a  
culture of excellence and innovation among school leaders. Leadership development programs are a cornerstone  
of the Department of Education’s Human Resource Development (HRD) practices, aimed at equipping current  
and aspiring school leaders with the skills necessary for effective management and decision-making. As one  
participant shared, “We have a Leadership Development Program that aims to enhance the management and  
leadership skills of current and aspiring school leaders. It covers areas like decision-making, conflict resolution,  
and instructional leadership” (Participant 1). These programs are essential for preparing teachers and staff to  
oversee academic programs, manage resources, and promote a collaborative environment. Training in key areas  
such as strategic planning and instructional leadership ensures that school leaders are equipped to address  
educational challenges effectively. For example, mentoring systems within schools, where trained leaders guide  
less experienced staff, promote professional growth, reduce turnover rates, and create a culture of shared  
responsibility.  
Recent studies reinforce their significance in educational contexts. For instance, Rai and Beresford-Dey (2023)  
emphasized that leadership training focused on instructional leadership and decision-making positively impacts  
teacher performance and student outcomes. Their research highlights the value of mentorship in fostering  
professional growth among educators, which aligns with the mentoring systems described. Similarly, Mazzetti  
and Schaufeli (2022) explored the role of leadership development in addressing resource management and  
collaboration. They found that strategic planning initiatives in training programs equip leaders with tools to  
tackle complex educational challenges effectively.  
Leadership development programs also cater to teachers interested in pursuing administrative roles. As another  
participant highlighted, “Every year, we conduct leadership development programs aimed at aspiring leaders.  
This includes training on leadership skills, decision-making, and conflict resolution, especially for teachers  
interested in administrative roles” (Participant 9). These initiatives empower educators to lead projects such as  
curriculum innovation and teacher collaboration, both of which are crucial for adapting to educational reforms  
and technological advancements. Culduz (2023) emphasized that such training cultivates a sense of  
accountability among teachers, resulting in improved classroom practices and student engagement.  
Furthermore, leadership training enhances organizational efficiency by equipping teachers and administrators  
with the tools needed for effective resource management and communication. For instance, workshops on team  
leadership and resource allocation enable school leaders to set clear goals, maintain high morale, and ensure  
smooth operations within their institutions. These skills are critical for sustaining a positive school culture and  
achieving educational goals. As the DepEd continues to invest in leadership development, it ensures that its  
workforce is prepared to meet the demands of modern education, developing both individual growth and  
institutional excellence.  
Staff Wellness and Mental Health Support  
The Department of Education recognizes that fostering a supportive and nurturing environment for its workforce  
is essential to achieving educational excellence. Another significant HRD practice in the Department of  
Education is staff wellness and mental health support, which are crucial for promoting a healthy and productive  
work environment. Teachers and staff face numerous stressors, such as workload pressures, student needs, and  
administrative demands, which can lead to burnout and decreased job satisfaction and performance. To address  
these challenges, wellness programs and mental health support play a key role in promoting resilience, emotional  
well-being, and overall physical health. For instance, the department offers counseling services and stress  
management workshops that help staff navigate mental health challenges. As one participant shared, “We have  
workshops on stress management, team-building activities, and even access to counseling services. This has  
Page 1441  
been beneficial for improving staff morale and productivity” (Participant 2). These initiatives enable teachers to  
better cope with their responsibilities while cultivating a more supportive work environment.  
In the same way, wellness programs also contribute to building a positive school culture where teachers feel  
valued and supported. Mental health initiatives, such as peer support groups and mindfulness practices,  
encourage open discussions about emotional struggles, reduce stigma, and strengthen workplace relationships.  
For example, team-building activities are incorporated into professional development offerings, as noted by  
another participant: “Team-building activities foster a collaborative environment and help staff builds stronger  
working relationships” (Participant 4). These efforts promote a sense of community and work-life balance,  
preventing burnout and enhancing overall job satisfaction. Moreover, regular stress management workshops,  
highlighted by Participant 5, are provided to both teaching and non-teaching staff, ensuring that all employees  
benefit from resources that support mental health and productivity.  
The benefits of mental health support extend beyond staff well-being to positively impact student outcomes.  
When teachers are mentally and emotionally healthy, they are better equipped to engage with students, manage  
classrooms effectively, and implement impactful teaching strategies. Research supports this connection, with  
Murphy (2024) noting that organizations prioritizing staff wellness see improvements in employee engagement,  
productivity, and retention rates.  
Digital Literacy and Online Learning  
DepEd continues to champion initiatives that empower educators to thrive in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.  
Through its Digital Literacy Program, DepEd provides training and resources to enhance teachers' technological  
competencies, ensuring they are equipped to deliver quality education in the 21st century. Digital literacy  
training has become a priority for the Department of Education, particularly with the shift toward online and  
blended learning environments. As one participant explained, “We provide workshops on using learning  
management systems, digital tools, and online resources to help teachers adapt to modern teaching  
requirements” (Participant 4). These initiatives equip teachers with the skills to effectively integrate technology  
into their classrooms, improving instruction and administrative processes. For example, during the pandemic,  
specialized training sessions enabled teachers to design interactive lessons, conduct virtual classes, and use data  
to monitor student progress. Another participant highlighted, “Specialized training sessions on blended learning  
approaches help teachers integrate online tools into traditional classrooms” (Participant 10). This training  
allows teachers to create engaging and flexible learning experiences, essential for modern education.  
The incorporation of online learning platforms not only supports teaching but also enhances student engagement  
and outcomes. Teachers proficient in digital literacy use tools such as learning management systems (LMS) to  
streamline lesson delivery, track student performance, and provide immediate feedback. These platforms, like  
Google Classroom and Microsoft Teams, have become vital for remote and hybrid learning settings. Research  
by Basar et al. (2021) underscores the importance of digital literacy, showing that teachers trained in online  
platforms exhibit increased confidence and effectiveness in managing virtual classrooms. This proficiency  
enables teachers to offer personalized learning opportunities tailored to individual student needs, further  
enriching the teaching-learning process.  
Beyond immediate classroom applications, digital literacy and online learning promote long-term professional  
growth and educational innovation. Teachers with advanced digital skills can connect with global professional  
learning networks, sharing best practices and collaborating on innovative strategies. These opportunities develop  
a culture of continuous improvement within the education system. Furthermore, integrating technology into  
teaching prepares teachers to adapt to future advancements and challenges in education.  
Peer Support and Mentorship Programs  
Peer support and mentorship programs are another significant practice in the professional development of  
teachers in the Department of Education. These programs create a collaborative environment where fellow  
teachers can share knowledge, skills, and experiences, promoting both personal and professional growth. One  
example is the Peer Mentorship Program, where experienced teachers guide and support their newer colleagues.  
Page 1442  
This initiative not only builds a supportive environment but also enables new teachers to gain practical insights  
and strategies from their more seasoned peers. As Participant 5 shared: “We have a Peer Mentorship Program  
where experienced teachers support newer ones. This program fosters a supportive environment and allows new  
teachers to gain practical insights and strategies from their more experienced colleagues.”  
Additionally, the Teacher Induction Program is offered in some Divisions to assist newly hired teachers. This  
program covers essential topics such as policies, expectations, and teaching standards, helping new teachers  
adapt to the Division's culture and ensuring a smooth transition into their roles. According to Participant 11:  
“Our division offers a Teacher Induction Program for new hires. This program covers policies, expectations,  
and teaching standards, which helps teachers adapt to our division's culture and ensures a smooth transition.  
Research supports the value of mentorship and peer support in education. According to Ingersoll and Strong  
(2011), mentorship programs significantly impact teacher retention and effectiveness. Their study found that  
new teachers who participated in structured mentorship programs were more likely to remain in the profession  
and demonstrated improved teaching practices. Ultimately, peer support and mentorship programs strengthen  
the education system by cultivating a culture of collaboration, shared growth, and continuous professional  
development. These initiatives ensure that new teachers are equipped to succeed while experienced teachers  
contribute to the collective improvement of teaching practices.  
Financial Support for Further Education  
Financial support for further education, such as scholarships and grants empowers teachers and staff to enhance  
their qualifications and expertise. Opportunities for graduate studies and specialized training not only contribute  
to personal and professional growth but also improve the overall quality of education in schools. As Participant  
7 stated, “Scholarships and grants are available for our teachers who want to further their studies. We  
encourage staff to pursue graduate studies or specialized training, as it benefits their personal growth and our  
Division’s teaching quality.” This support system reflects the Department of Education’s commitment to  
nurturing lifelong learning among its teachers. Investing in financial assistance programs encourages more  
teachers to pursue advanced degrees or certifications, leading to improved instructional methods and leadership  
skills.  
For instance, teachers who enroll in postgraduate programs often develop specialized knowledge in curriculum  
design, pedagogy, or subject expertise, which they can bring back to their classrooms. Moreover, financial  
support for further education contributes to institutional development by developing a culture of excellence and  
innovation. Teachers with advanced training are better equipped to implement evidence-based practices, mentor  
colleagues, and assume leadership roles within their schools. Research by Smet (2021) found that teachers who  
received financial support for further education reported higher levels of motivation and job satisfaction, with a  
positive impact on student outcomes. Similarly, funding opportunities make professional development accessible  
to teachers who might otherwise face financial barriers, ensuring equal opportunities for advancement.  
Problem 2: How do HRD specialists assess the professional development needs of teachers and non-  
teaching staff?  
Matrix 2  
The Selected Significant Responses, Formulated Meaning, and Themes on HRD Specialists’ Assessment of  
Professional Development Needs for Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff  
Selected Significant Responses  
Formulated Meaning  
Themes  
“We use online surveys to gather input from Tools such as surveys, focus  
teachers and non-teaching staff. These surveys groups, and interviews gather  
allow us to reach a wide group and collect data staff  
insights  
into  
their  
Gathering Staff Input  
on  
areas  
they  
feel  
need  
improvement.” challenges and developmental  
(Participant 1)  
needs.  
Page 1443  
“We hold focus group discussions with both  
teaching and non-teaching staff. These group  
discussions often bring up shared challenges and  
help  
us  
identify  
areas  
for  
improvement  
collectively.” (Participant 4)  
“We utilize one-on-one interviews with selected  
staff members, allowing us to go deeper into their  
specific challenges and improvement needs.”  
(Participant 10)  
Plus (10) ten other responses.  
“Classroom observations are one of our primary  
tools. Observing teachers in action helps us  
identify specific instructional strategies that may  
need further development.” (Participant 2)  
“We use self-assessment tools where staff  
members rate their own skills and identify areas  
where they feel they need improvement. This  
helps us address their personal development  
goals.” (Participant 5)  
Classroom observations, self-  
assessments, and peer feedback  
identify instructional gaps and  
Observational and  
Self-Reflective  
Methods  
areas  
for  
personal  
improvement.  
Peer observations are another effective tool.  
Teachers observe each other and provide  
constructive feedback, which highlights areas  
where  
they  
feel  
improvements  
could  
be  
beneficial.” (Participant 9)  
Plus (10) ten other responses.  
“We categorize needs based on urgency and  
impact. Those that directly affect student learning  
outcomes are prioritized and addressed first  
through targeted training sessions.” (Participant  
1)  
Prioritization  
urgency, impact, and available  
resources, focusing on student  
outcomes  
implementation.  
is  
based  
on  
“Budget availability plays a role in prioritizing  
needs. We focus on high-priority, high-impact  
needs that fit within our budget, and plan other  
Prioritization and  
Resource Allocation  
and  
feasible  
initiatives  
as  
funds  
become  
available.”  
(Participant 3)  
“Immediate needs are scheduled first, while less  
urgent needs are planned for the coming school  
year.” (Participant 8)  
Plus (10) ten other responses.  
Alignment  
educational  
leadership input ensures the  
relevance and necessity of  
HRD programs.  
with  
goals  
broader  
and  
“We rank needs by alignment with regional and  
national educational priorities. If a need aligns  
with these goals, it becomes a higher priority in  
our planning.” (Participant 6)  
Strategic Alignment  
Page 1444  
“Feedback from school heads helps us prioritize  
needs. If multiple school heads highlight the same  
area of improvement, we address it through  
targeted training or support.” (Participant 7)  
“Needs are also prioritized based on the level of  
support they already have. For example, if  
certain skills have been neglected, we give them  
more attention through our HRD programs.”  
(Participant 10)  
Plus (10) ten other responses.  
Matrix 2 highlights four key themes in the assessment and addressing of professional development needs for  
teaching and non-teaching staff. The first theme, gathering staff input, emphasizes the importance of collecting  
feedback from staff through surveys, consultations, and other methods to identify their specific development  
needs. The second theme, observational and self-reflective methods, focuses on using observations and self-  
reflection as tools to gain insights into individual and team performance, which informs targeted development  
strategies. The third theme, prioritization and resource allocation, ensures that the most critical professional  
development needs are addressed first, with resources allocated efficiently to meet those needs. Finally, strategic  
alignment ensures that professional development initiatives are in line with the broader goals and priorities of  
the school division, contributing to the overall educational objectives. These themes work together to provide a  
structured approach to fostering staff growth and improving overall educational effectiveness.  
Gathering Staff Input  
Gathering staff input is a crucial practice for HRD specialists in assessing and addressing the professional  
development needs of teaching and non-teaching staff. Actively involving employees in identifying areas for  
improvement ensures that HRD programs address specific challenges and enhance overall performance. As one  
participant noted, “We use online surveys to gather input from teachers and non-teaching staff. These surveys  
allow us to reach a wide group and collect data on areas they feel need improvement” (Participant 1). Such  
surveys are effective in collecting comprehensive data and ensuring that the voices of a diverse group of  
employees are heard. This data-driven approach allows HRD specialists to design relevant training programs  
that align with the actual needs of the workforce.  
In addition to surveys, more interactive methods like focus group discussions provide valuable insights into  
shared challenges and collective needs. As another participant explained, “We hold focus group discussions with  
both teaching and non-teaching staff. These group discussions often bring up shared challenges and help us  
identify areas for improvement collectively” (Participant 4). Focus group discussions create a platform for open  
dialogue, enabling HRD specialists to explore common issues and encourage collaboration among staff. For  
example, if multiple teachers highlight challenges in integrating technology into their teaching, HRD specialists  
can prioritize digital literacy workshops. Research by Bah et al. (2024) indicated the importance of collaborative  
input, revealing that organizations that actively involve employees in identifying professional development  
needs achieve higher engagement and program effectiveness.  
For a more in-depth understanding of individual concerns, one-on-one interviews are also employed to  
personalize support. As one participant shared, “We utilize one-on-one interviews with selected staff members,  
allowing us to go deeper into their specific challenges and improvement needs” (Participant 10). These  
interviews provide an opportunity for staff to share personal experiences and challenges that may not emerge in  
broader surveys or group discussions. For instance, a non-teaching staff member can highlight unique issues  
with administrative workflows that require targeted interventions. Research by Thahir et al. (2021) showed that  
personalized approaches to professional development, informed by direct staff input, significantly improve job  
satisfaction and performance.  
Page 1445  
Observational and Self-Reflective Methods  
In the same way, it was discovered that observational and self-reflective methods are essential tools used by  
HRD specialists to assess and address the professional development needs of teachers and staff in the Department  
of Education. Classroom observations, for instance, offer valuable insights into teaching practices and  
instructional strategies that may need further development. As one participant stated, “Classroom observations  
are one of our primary tools. Observing teachers in action helps us identify specific instructional strategies that  
may need further development” (Participant 2). These observations enable HRD specialists to provide targeted  
support, such as workshops or mentoring programs, to address gaps in teaching techniques. For example,  
observing a teacher struggling with classroom management may lead to recommendations for specific training  
in student engagement strategies. Research by Tarusha and Bushi (2024) emphasizes the importance of  
observational methods, noting their effectiveness in identifying actionable areas for improvement in teaching  
practices.  
Self-reflective methods, such as self-assessment tools, empower staff to take an active role in their professional  
development. As another participant explained, “We use self-assessment tools where staff members rate their  
own skills and identify areas where they feel they need improvement. This helps us address their personal  
development goals” (Participant 5). These tools encourage teachers and non-teaching staff to reflect on their  
strengths and areas for growth, fostering a culture of self-awareness and continuous learning. For instance, a  
teacher who identifies a lack of confidence in using digital tools may seek training to enhance their skills in this  
area. According to a study by Musaigwa (2023), self-assessment methods improve employee engagement and  
ensure professional development plans align with individual aspirations, resulting in more effective outcomes.  
Similarly, peer observations further complement these methods by promoting collaborative professional growth.  
One participant noted, “Peer observations are another effective tool. Teachers observe each other and provide  
constructive feedback, which highlights areas where they feel improvements could be beneficial” (Participant  
9). This method fosters a supportive environment where teachers can learn from one another, share best practices,  
and develop their skills collaboratively. For example, a teacher observing a colleague’s innovative use of  
technology in the classroom might adopt similar techniques in their own teaching. Research by To, Tan, and  
Lim (2023) emphasized the value of peer observations, showing that they not only enhance instructional quality  
but also strengthen professional relationships among teachers and staff.  
Prioritization and Resource Allocation  
It was also brought to light that prioritization and resource allocation are key aspects of the HRD specialists'  
approach to addressing professional development needs within the Department of Education. The process begins  
with categorizing the needs based on urgency and impact, ensuring that the most pressing issues are addressed  
first. As one participant stated, “We categorize needs based on urgency and impact. Those that directly affect  
student learning outcomes are prioritized and addressed first through targeted training sessions” (Participant  
1). By focusing on areas that have a direct impact on student learning, HRD specialists ensure that resources are  
allocated efficiently to improve educational outcomes. For example, if teachers require training on new  
instructional methods that are crucial to enhancing student engagement, these training sessions will be prioritized  
to improve classroom practices swiftly.  
In the same vein, budget availability plays a significant role in the prioritization process, influencing the scope  
and timeline of HRD initiatives. As another participant highlighted, “Budget availability plays a role in  
prioritizing needs. We focus on high-priority, high-impact needs that fit within our budget, and plan other  
initiatives as funds become available” (Participant 3). HRD specialists must align their professional  
development goals with the financial resources available to them. This means that high-priority needs, such as  
leadership training or technology integration, are given precedence, while other less urgent training initiatives  
may be deferred until additional funds are allocated. Studies by Pratama, Dachyar, and Rhezza (2023) reinforced  
that effective resource allocation ensures that critical areas of development are met without overextending  
limited budgets, leading to a more sustainable approach to professional growth.  
Page 1446  
The scheduling of professional development activities also reflects the urgency of the identified needs. As one  
participant explained, “Immediate needs are scheduled first, while less urgent needs are planned for the coming  
school year” (Participant 8). This approach ensures that immediate challenges are addressed in a timely manner  
while allowing for strategic planning of long-term professional development goals. For example, if a new  
educational policy requires immediate implementation, HRD specialists would prioritize related training  
sessions, while planning other initiatives, like wellness programs or specialized certifications, for the following  
year. According to Bello et al. (2024), effective prioritization and resource allocation not only optimize the  
impact of HRD programs but also help in managing expectations and ensuring that resources are used wisely to  
meet the most critical needs.  
Strategic Alignment  
Ultimately, strategic alignment is a critical factor in prioritizing professional development initiatives for teachers  
and staff in the Department of Education. HRD specialists ensure that identified needs are ranked based on their  
alignment with regional and national educational priorities. As one participant explained, “We rank needs by  
alignment with regional and national educational priorities. If a need aligns with these goals, it becomes a  
higher priority in our planning” (Participant 6). This approach ensures that HRD programs not only address  
immediate concerns but also contribute to broader educational objectives. For example, if a national initiative  
emphasizes digital literacy, HRD specialists prioritize training sessions on integrating technology into teaching.  
Such alignment fosters cohesive efforts across various levels of the education system, leading to a unified  
direction in professional development.  
In a similar fashion, feedback from school heads also plays a significant role in aligning HRD efforts with the  
strategic goals of schools. As another participant noted, “Feedback from school heads helps us prioritize needs.  
If multiple school heads highlight the same area of improvement, we address it through targeted training or  
support” (Participant 7). This collaborative approach ensures that HRD specialists focus on areas that are directly  
relevant to the schools' operational needs and objectives. For instance, if several school heads identify a need for  
improved classroom management techniques, HRD programs can include workshops addressing this specific  
concern. Research by Mallillin (2023) supports this method, demonstrating that involving school leadership in  
HRD planning leads to more impactful and context-relevant professional development initiatives.  
Additionally, HRD specialists consider the level of existing support for various skills when determining  
priorities. As one participant shared, “Needs are also prioritized based on the level of support they already have.  
For example, if certain skills have been neglected, we give them more attention through our HRD programs”  
(Participant 10). Addressing gaps in under-supported areas ensures balanced professional growth and prevents  
critical skills from being overlooked. For example, if training in conflict resolution has been historically  
neglected, HRD specialists might develop targeted programs to address this deficiency. According to Arulsamy  
et al. (2023), focusing on neglected areas not only enhances overall competency but also boosts staff morale by  
addressing long-standing professional development needs.  
Problem 3: What challenges do HRD specialists encounter in implementing HRD programs and  
initiatives?  
Matrix 3 focuses on the challenges faced by HRD specialists in implementing professional development  
initiatives for teaching and non-teaching staff within school division offices. Four key themes emerge as  
significant barriers to effective implementation. The first is financial limitations, which highlight the constraints  
posed by inadequate funding and budgetary restrictions that hinder the delivery of comprehensive development  
programs. The second theme, staffing challenges, underscores issues such as insufficient personnel and the  
difficulty in balancing workloads while accommodating professional development activities. The third theme,  
resource accessibility issues, points to the limited availability of necessary materials, tools, and facilities needed  
to support training initiatives. Finally, structural and organizational barriers refer to systemic issues within the  
organization, such as rigid policies or inefficient processes, that impede the smooth execution of professional  
development efforts. These themes collectively illustrate the complexities and hurdles HRD specialists must  
navigate to enhance staff capacity effectively.  
Page 1447  
Matrix 3  
The Selected Significant Responses, Formulated Meaning, and Emergent Themes on Challenges Faced by HRD  
Specialists in Implementing HRD Programs and Initiatives  
Selected Significant Responses  
Formulated Meaning  
Themes  
“Limited budget impacts the type of training we  
can offer, sometimes postponing or canceling  
programs.” (Participant 1)  
Budget constraints hinder the  
ability to consistently offer  
impactful and ongoing HRD  
programs.  
“Budget allocation is a significant issue. Without  
a dedicated HRD budget, offering regular  
programs is difficult.” (Participant 3)  
Financial Limitations  
“Lack of funds restricts continuous development,  
limiting programs to one-off sessions that hinder  
long-term growth.” (Participant 5)  
“Staffing constraints mean we don’t have enough  
people to manage and implement HRD initiatives  
effectively.” (Participant 2)  
Insufficient staffing limits the  
capacity to plan, execute, and  
“Limited staffing affects follow-up on training  
initiatives,  
reducing  
the  
effectiveness  
of  
Staffing Challenges  
sustain  
HRD  
initiatives  
workplace learning.” (Participant 6)  
effectively.  
“Small teams struggle to coordinate multiple  
programs simultaneously, slowing progress.”  
(Participant 9)  
“Resource constraints mean we rely on online  
sessions instead of in-person workshops, limiting  
interaction.” (Participant 4)  
Resource gaps in technology,  
“Lack of travel funds affects access to training for travel funds, and access limit  
remote areas, leaving some schools HRD program reach and  
underserved.” (Participant 10) quality.  
Resource  
Accessibility Issues  
“Using in-house trainers instead of specialists  
can reduce program depth.” Participant 11)  
“Balancing HRD with competing priorities  
affects focus and implementation.” (Participant  
7)  
Competing priorities, policy  
changes, and limited leadership  
backing disrupt HRD program  
consistency.  
“Policy changes require frequent adjustments to  
HRD plans, disrupting consistency." (Participant  
12)  
Structural and  
Organizational  
Barriers  
“Leadership support is sometimes insufficient,  
impacting program effectiveness.” (Participant  
13)  
Financial Limitations  
Financial limitations significantly affect the implementation and sustainability of HRD programs in the  
Department of Education. Budget constraints directly influence the type and frequency of training offered to  
Page 1448  
teachers and staff. As one participant noted, “Limited budget impacts the type of training we can offer, sometimes  
postponing or canceling programs” (Participant 1). For instance, essential programs like digital literacy  
workshops or leadership training may be delayed due to insufficient funds, leaving critical professional  
development needs unaddressed. Such disruptions can stall the progress of initiatives aimed at improving  
teaching quality and administrative efficiency, highlighting the need for stable funding sources to ensure  
continuity in HRD efforts.  
The lack of a dedicated HRD budget poses a significant challenge to offering consistent professional  
development opportunities. As one participant noted, “Budget allocation is a significant issue. Without a  
dedicated HRD budget, offering regular programs is difficult” (Participant 3). Many HRD activities rely on  
reallocated funds from other school programs, which can result in inadequate resources for addressing critical  
development areas. For example, if funding for technology integration is deprioritized, teachers may lack the  
necessary training to adapt to modern educational tools, affecting both their professional growth and student  
outcomes. This issue highlights the importance of consistent funding for HRD programs, as emphasized by Day  
et al. (2016), who argue that such funding is essential for maintaining the quality and relevance of professional  
development in education.  
Moreover, financial limitations often restrict HRD initiatives to one-off sessions rather than sustained programs,  
which undermines long-term growth. As a participant observed, “Lack of funds restricts continuous  
development, limiting programs to one-off sessions that hinder long-term growth” (Participant 5). While single-  
session training can address immediate needs, it often fails to provide the comprehensive skill-building required  
for lasting improvements. For instance, a single workshop on classroom management may introduce strategies  
but lacks the follow-up sessions necessary for reinforcing and refining these skills. Studies by Padillo et al.  
(2021) suggest that continuous professional development, supported by adequate funding, yields better outcomes  
in teacher performance and student achievement by fostering deeper learning and practical application over time.  
Staffing Challenges  
Staffing challenges present significant obstacles to the effective implementation of HRD initiatives in the  
Department of Education. Insufficient personnel to manage and execute programs can limit the scope and quality  
of professional development opportunities. As one participant explained, “Staffing constraints mean we don’t  
have enough people to manage and implement HRD initiatives effectively” (Participant 2). This shortage often  
results in overburdened teams, delaying program rollouts and reducing the overall impact of HRD efforts. For  
instance, when key HRD activities like teacher training on new curriculum standards are postponed due to  
staffing shortages, it compromises the readiness of teachers and staff to meet updated educational requirements.  
Follow-up on training initiatives is another area where limited staffing impacts effectiveness. As one participant  
explained, “Limited staffing affects follow-up on training initiatives, reducing the effectiveness of workplace  
learning” (Participant 6). Without adequate personnel, it becomes difficult to assess whether participants are  
applying newly acquired skills or to provide additional support when needed. For example, teachers who attend  
a workshop on differentiated instruction may require subsequent mentoring sessions to fully implement these  
techniques in their classrooms. According to Kushwaha (2023), sustained follow-up is critical for reinforcing  
learning and ensuring that professional development translates into measurable improvements in teaching  
practices.  
In the same way, small teams managing HRD initiatives also face difficulties coordinating multiple programs  
simultaneously, further hindering progress. “Small teams struggle to coordinate multiple programs  
simultaneously, slowing progress” (Participant 9). For instance, a single HRD team tasked with organizing  
leadership training, wellness programs, and digital literacy workshops may lack the capacity to deliver all  
programs effectively, leading to delays or compromised quality. Research by Jubaidi and Khoirunnisa (2023)  
emphasized the importance of adequate staffing for HRD programs, highlighting that well-staffed teams can  
better handle the complexities of planning, execution, and evaluation, ultimately leading to more successful  
outcomes.  
Page 1449  
Resource Accessibility Issue  
Resource accessibility issues pose significant challenges to the delivery of effective HRD programs in the  
Department of Education. One notable constraint is the reliance on online sessions due to resource limitations,  
which reduces the level of interaction and engagement compared to in-person workshops. As one participant  
shared, “Resource constraints mean we rely on online sessions instead of in-person workshops, limiting  
interaction” (Participant 4). While online sessions are a cost-effective alternative, they may not fully replicate  
the immersive learning experiences that face-to-face interactions provide, which are often essential for building  
stronger relationships and facilitating deeper discussions. As suggested by Hollister (2022), in-person training  
is often more effective in promoting collaborative learning and creating opportunities for direct feedback from  
trainers.  
Another challenge is the lack of travel funds, which can limit access to training for staff in remote areas, leaving  
some schools underserved. As one participant noted, “Lack of travel funds affects access to training for remote  
areas, leaving some schools underserved” (Participant 10). This can result in teachers in distant locations  
missing out on critical professional development opportunities that are available to their peers in urban areas. As  
observed, teachers in remote schools do not have access to specialized training in areas like digital literacy or  
curriculum updates, further exacerbating educational inequities. Research by Afzal et al. (2023) indicates that  
geographical barriers to professional development programs can widen the gap in teaching quality, particularly  
for educators in rural or underserved regions.  
Finally, the use of in-house trainers instead of external specialists can reduce the depth and quality of HRD  
programs. As observed by a participant, “Using in-house trainers instead of specialists can reduce program  
depth” (Participant 11). In-house trainers, while knowledgeable, may lack the specialized expertise required to  
deliver cutting-edge training in areas like advanced technology integration or leadership development. This  
limitation can prevent teachers and staff from gaining access to the most current methodologies or best practices  
in education. According to Asiyah et al. (2021), specialized training delivered by external experts brings fresh  
perspectives and advanced techniques that are often crucial for driving innovation and improving teaching  
practices.  
Structural and Organizational Barrier  
Structural and organizational barriers pose significant challenges to the successful implementation of HRD  
programs in the Department of Education. One of the primary barriers is the need to balance HRD initiatives  
with competing priorities, which can divert attention and resources away from professional development efforts.  
As one participant noted, “Balancing HRD with competing priorities affects focus and implementation”  
(Participant 7). In schools and divisions, HRD programs often compete with other pressing tasks such as  
administrative duties, student assessments, and curriculum changes. This can lead to HRD initiatives being  
sidelined or delayed, affecting the overall effectiveness of these programs. According to Namada (2018),  
organizational priorities and competing demands often result in insufficient attention to HRD, hindering the  
development of staff and the improvement of teaching practices.  
Additionally, frequent policy changes require HRD programs to be continuously adjusted, disrupting their  
consistency and long-term planning. As stated by one participant, “Policy changes require frequent adjustments  
to HRD plans, disrupting consistency” (Participant 12). When education policies or priorities shift, HRD  
initiatives must be realigned to meet new requirements, often leading to confusion or loss of focus on previously  
established goals. For example, if a new national curriculum is introduced, HRD programs may need to be  
redesigned to train teachers on the changes, leaving little time for other essential professional development  
activities. A study by Al-Suraihi et al. (2021) emphasizes that constant policy changes can undermine the  
stability and continuity of HRD programs, preventing them from achieving their intended outcomes.  
Leadership support is another crucial factor that influences the success of HRD programs. Without strong  
backing from school leaders, HRD initiatives may lack the necessary resources, motivation, and visibility. As  
one participant pointed out, “Leadership support is sometimes insufficient, impacting program effectiveness”  
(Participant 13). When leaders do not fully support or prioritize HRD efforts, it can lead to inadequate funding,  
Page 1450  
a lack of participation, and low morale among staff. Research by Okolie et al. (2021) shows that strong leadership  
support is essential for ensuring that HRD programs are properly implemented and sustained. Effective leaders  
provide the resources, encouragement, and strategic direction needed to ensure that HRD initiatives are  
successfully carried out and lead to tangible improvements in teaching and learning.  
Problem 4: How do HRD specialists evaluate the effectiveness of HRD programs in enhancing the skills  
and competencies of educators?  
Matrix 4 highlights the strategies employed by HRD specialists to evaluate the effectiveness of HRD programs  
in enhancing educators’ skills and competencies. Three key themes emerged: measuring training effectiveness,  
performance-based impact assessment, and behavior and skill improvements. Measuring training effectiveness  
involves using tools such as pre- and post-training evaluations, feedback forms, and performance reviews to  
determine whether the programs meet their intended objectives. Performance-based impact assessment focuses  
on linking training outcomes to tangible improvements in teachers’ job performance and instructional practices,  
ensuring alignment with organizational goals. Additionally, behavior and skill improvements are monitored by  
observing how teachers and staff apply acquired skills in practice, enabling HRD specialists to identify areas for  
further support.  
Matrix 4  
The Selected Responses, Formulated Meaning, and Themes on How HRD Specialists Evaluate the Effectiveness  
of HRD Programs in Enhancing Educators' Skills and Competencies  
Selected Significant Responses  
Formulated Meaning  
Themes  
“We use post-training surveys to get immediate  
feedback from participants.” (Participant 1)  
“Follow-up evaluations a few months after training  
are a key measure to check practical application of  
learning.” (Participant 3)  
Immediate  
and  
follow-up  
Measuring  
Training  
Effectiveness  
evaluations, including classroom  
assessments, gauge the practical  
application of training outcomes.  
“Observations before and after training reveal  
skill application.” (Participant 8)  
“Classroom assessments showed students were  
more engaged and performed better after  
differentiated instruction training.” (Participant  
12)  
“We track improvements in staff performance after  
HRD programs.” (Participant 2)  
“Feedback from school heads highlights growth  
areas and improvements in staff performance.”  
(Participant 7)  
Observable  
improvements  
from supervisors reflect the  
impact of HRD on teaching and  
management.  
performance  
and feedback  
Performance-  
Based Impact  
Assessment  
“Through coaching sessions, we observed teachers  
applying new classroom management techniques,  
resulting in better environments.” (Participant 10)  
“We have seen noticeable improvements in  
teaching effectiveness and student engagement  
after staff participated in HRD programs.”  
(Participant 5)  
Page 1451  
“Ongoing performance reviews show that teachers  
are consistently applying new strategies, leading to  
enhanced classroom outcomes.” (Participant)  
“Student feedback indicates engagement and  
effectiveness  
of  
teachers'  
new  
strategies.”  
(Participant 4)  
“Post-training assessments show skill retention  
and knowledge improvement.” (Participant 6)  
“Training on mental health awareness led to Assessments  
and  
behavioral  
wellness practices and reduced stress among changes,  
such as  
wellness Behavior and Skill  
teachers and students.” (Participant 13)  
practices and student feedback,  
validate the benefits of training.  
Improvements  
“Interactive workshops have  
increased  
collaborative teaching practices and improved  
classroom dynamics.” (Participant 5)  
“Regular coaching sessions post-training have  
helped sustain teaching innovations and foster  
professional growth.” (Participant 9)  
Measuring Training Effectiveness  
Measuring training effectiveness is essential to ensure that HRD initiatives achieve their intended outcomes and  
promotes professional growth among teachers and staff. One approach is the use of post-training surveys to  
gather immediate feedback from participants about the relevance and quality of the program. According to one  
participant, “We use post-training surveys to get immediate feedback from participants” (Participant 1). These  
surveys provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the training, enabling facilitators to make  
improvements for future sessions. Additionally, follow-up evaluations conducted a few months after training  
help assess the practical application of learning in real-world scenarios. As another participant shared, “Follow-  
up evaluations a few months after training are a key measure to check practical application of learning”  
(Participant 3). Parpucu and Al-Mabuk (2023) found that collecting feedback immediately after training and  
conducting follow-up evaluations significantly improve professional development programs. Their study  
emphasized that timely feedback enables organizations to refine training content, while follow-up assessments  
help measure long-term skill application in workplace settings.  
Observational methods are also a key strategy for evaluating the impact of training programs. Observations  
conducted before and after training sessions provide direct evidence of how well participants are applying newly  
learned skills in their roles. As one participant noted, “Observations before and after training reveal skill  
application” (Participant 8). This method allows HRD specialists to identify areas where further support or  
reinforcement may be needed. Furthermore, classroom assessments serve as an indirect measure of training  
effectiveness by evaluating changes in student outcomes. For example, one participant observed that “Classroom  
assessments showed students were more engaged and performed better after differentiated instruction training”  
(Participant 12). A study by Kahmann et al. (2022) concluded that observational data and classroom-based  
assessments effectively measure professional development impact, as their study demonstrated significant  
improvements in student performance and engagement through teacher-training programs on differentiated  
instruction.  
Performance-Based Impact Assessment  
Performance-based impact assessment is a vital approach to evaluating the effectiveness of HRD programs in  
the Department of Education. One method involves tracking improvements in staff performance after training,  
as noted by one participant: “We track improvements in staff performance after HRD programs” (Participant  
2). Feedback from school heads also provides valuable insights, as they often highlight areas of growth and  
Page 1452  
specific improvements in staff performance (Participant 7). These performance-based evaluations offer clear  
evidence of how HRD initiatives influence teachers' abilities to manage classrooms, deliver lessons, and  
implement innovative teaching practices. Furthermore, coaching sessions serve as a practical tool for monitoring  
the application of new skills, with one participant observing that “Through coaching sessions, we observed  
teachers applying new classroom management techniques, resulting in better environments” (Participant 10).  
Ongoing performance reviews further demonstrate the long-term impact of HRD initiatives. Teachers  
consistently apply newly acquired strategies, leading to enhanced classroom outcomes and improved student  
engagement. One participant highlighted that “We have seen noticeable improvements in teaching effectiveness  
and student engagement after staff participated in HRD programs” (Participant 5). These observations align  
with research by Darling-Hammond et al. (2017), which found that sustained professional development improves  
teaching effectiveness and fosters higher student achievement. Performance reviews also indicate that HRD  
programs encourage continuous growth, ensuring that teachers remain equipped to address evolving educational  
challenges effectively.  
Behavior and Skill Improvements  
Behavior and skill improvements are key indicators of the success of HRD initiatives, reflecting the tangible  
benefits of professional development on both teachers, staff, and students. For instance, student feedback plays  
a crucial role in assessing the engagement and effectiveness of teachers’ newly implemented strategies. As one  
participant noted, "Student feedback indicates engagement and effectiveness of teachers' new strategies"  
(Participant 4). Similarly, post-training assessments highlight significant skill retention and knowledge  
improvement among participants, demonstrating the lasting impact of HRD programs. "Post-training  
assessments show skill retention and knowledge improvement" (Participant 6). These findings align with research  
by Garcia and Weiss (2021), which emphasized that regular feedback from stakeholders and structured post-  
training evaluations are critical for reinforcing learning and promoting behavioral changes in educational  
settings.  
Moreover, specialized training programs contribute to promoting wellness and collaboration, which translate to  
improved school environments. Training on mental health awareness, for instance, has resulted in wellness  
practices that reduce stress for both teachers and students. "Training on mental health awareness led to wellness  
practices and reduced stress among teachers and students" (Participant 13). Interactive workshops have also  
enhanced collaborative teaching practices and improved classroom dynamics. "Interactive workshops have  
increased collaborative teaching practices and improved classroom dynamics" (Participant 5). Regular coaching  
sessions post-training further sustain these teaching innovations, fostering long-term professional growth and  
the application of advanced instructional strategies. "Regular coaching sessions post-training have helped  
sustain teaching innovations and foster professional growth" (Participant 9). Studies by Ekins (2021) support  
these observations, highlighting that collaborative practices and ongoing mentorship amplify the positive  
outcomes of professional development by creating supportive environments for continued skill application.  
In response to the findings of the study, a set of targeted recommendations was developed and transformed into  
SMART goals to enhance the implementation of human resource development initiatives within DepEd Northern  
Mindanao. These SMART goals integrate concrete actions, realistic budgetary allocations, and clear indicators  
of success to ensure practical application and measurable progress. The table below outlines these goals,  
providing a structured roadmap that HRD units and Schools Division Offices can use to strengthen professional  
development systems, address existing gaps, and optimize outcomes for teachers and education personnel.  
Measurable  
SMART Goal  
Specific Actions  
Budget Allocation  
Success  
Timeline  
Indicators  
1.  
Strengthen  
. Conduct  
quarterly  
Leadership  
Training:  
. 90% of school  
heads trained  
12 months  
leadership,  
wellness, digital  
literacy, peer  
₱150,000/yr  
Page 1453  
mentorship, and  
advanced  
education  
leadership  
trainings.  
Wellness  
Programs:  
₱80,000/yr  
. 75% staff attend  
wellness program  
. Hold biannual  
wellness programs. Digital Literacy:  
. 100 teachers  
certified in digital  
literacy  
programs.  
₱120,000/yr  
. Facilitate  
monthly digital  
literacy training.  
Mentorship  
Materials:  
₱50,000/yr  
. Peer mentorship  
active in all  
districts  
. Institutionalize  
peer mentorship.  
Scholarships:  
₱300,000/yr  
. 10 staff  
supported for  
advanced  
. Provide  
financial aid for  
advanced  
education  
Total:  
education.  
₱700,000/yr  
2.  
Improve  
. Conduct annual  
standardized  
Surveys:  
₱40,000/yr  
. 95% school  
participation in  
assessments  
6 months (full roll-  
out); annually  
sustained  
needs assessment  
and alignment with needs-assessment  
division goals.  
Consultations:  
₱60,000/yr  
surveys.  
. 100% PD  
. Hold division-  
wide consultations  
annually.  
programs aligned  
with division goals  
HRD Training:  
₱100,000/yr  
. At least 20 HRD  
specialists trained  
Total:  
₱200,000/yr  
. Train HRD  
specialists on  
advanced  
assessment tools  
. Address financial  
limitations,  
staffing shortages,  
and resource gaps.  
.
Request  
20% increase in  
PD budget.  
PD Budget  
Increase: ₱500,000 delays due to  
. 20% reduction in 12 months  
staffing/resource  
issues  
Staffing:  
. Hire/designate 2  
HRD support  
personnel.  
₱960,000/yr (2  
personnel)  
. 100% of  
trainings well-  
equipped  
Equipment:  
. Procure training ₱350,000 (one-  
materials and  
time)  
. HRD  
digital equipment  
productivity  
increases by 30%  
Total: ₱1,810,000  
(Year 1)  
Streamline  
Form policy  
review committee.  
Committee:  
₱60,000/yr  
30% reduction in  
processing time  
12 months  
organizational  
processes and  
reduce policy  
barriers.  
Revise/simplify 5  
HRD policies.  
Digital System +  
Training:  
₱200,000  
50% increase in  
timely document  
submissions  
Digitize HRD  
workflows.  
5 revised policies  
implemented  
Total: ₱260,000  
Page 1454  
Strengthen  
Implement  
Evaluation Tools:  
100% PD activities 6 months  
evaluation of HRD standardized  
₱50,000  
with pre/post tests  
(implementation)  
programs.  
pre/post tests.  
Data Analytics:  
₱70,000/yr  
10% improvement  
in assessment  
results  
Require outcome-  
based reporting  
from all trainers.  
80% of trained  
Total:  
Track RPMS-  
linked teacher  
performance  
improvements  
teachers improve  
RPMS indicators  
₱120,000/yr  
CONCLUSION  
Based on the results and findings of the study, the following conclusions are drawn:  
HRD specialists implement a variety of practices to enhance staff development, including leadership training to  
build managerial skills, wellness support to foster resilience, digital literacy programs to improve technological  
competence, peer mentorship to encourage collaborative growth, and financial aid for further education to help  
employees advance their qualifications.  
To assess and address the professional development needs of staff, HRD specialists rely on surveys and  
consultations to gather feedback, alongside observational and self-reflective methods to gain deeper insights.  
They prioritize needs based on urgency and ensure that development initiatives are aligned with the broader  
educational goals of the division.  
However, HRD specialists face several challenges in program implementation. These include financial  
limitations that hinder the delivery of comprehensive training, staffing shortages that complicate scheduling and  
participation, limited access to essential resources needed for effective training, and organizational barriers such  
as rigid policies that obstruct smooth execution.  
Despite these challenges, HRD specialists evaluate the effectiveness of their programs by conducting pre- and  
post-training assessments to track changes in skills, linking the outcomes of training to improvements in job  
performance, and observing how newly acquired skills are applied in practice to ensure continuous professional  
growth.  
RECOMMENDATIONS  
Based on the findings and conclusions of the study, the following recommendations are made:  
DepEd Secretary may support policy changes that streamline the implementation of HRD programs, addressing  
systemic barriers such as rigid policies and ensuring that HRD initiatives align with the department’s broader  
educational goals and priorities.  
Regional Director may facilitate inter-division collaboration by promoting the sharing of best practices and  
resources, ensuring greater consistency and access to professional development opportunities across the region.  
Schools Division Superintendent may prioritize the allocation of resources to HRD programs, ensuring sufficient  
staffing and materials to effectively deliver professional development initiatives and address identified staff  
needs.  
HRD specialists may enhance their current practices by incorporating more frequent feedback mechanisms, such  
as follow-up surveys and consultations, to ensure that professional development programs are responsive to the  
evolving needs of teaching and non-teaching staff.  
Page 1455  
Future researchers may explore the long-term impacts of HRD programs on staff retention and performance, as  
well as investigate the effectiveness of different HRD strategies across diverse educational contexts to further  
refine and enhance HRD practices in the education sector.  
LIMITATIONS  
Despite its valuable insights, this study is bounded by several limitations. First, the geographic span is restricted  
to the Department of Education (DepEd) Northern Mindanao, which may limit the transferability of findings to  
other regions with different administrative structures or HRD contexts. Second, the sample composition consists  
of only 13 purposively selected HRD specialists, representing a small and specific group whose experiences may  
not fully capture the diversity of perspectives across all divisions or personnel levels. Lastly, the study was  
conducted within a limited time frame, which may have constrained the depth of data collection and hindered  
opportunities for prolonged engagement, follow-up interviews, or extended observation. These limitations  
should be considered when interpreting the results and applying them to broader HRD practices in the Philippine  
education system.  
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  
The authors extend their deepest gratitude to all those who contributed to the success of this research and the  
preparation of this manuscript. Special acknowledgment is given to Almighty God for granting wisdom, good  
health, and unwavering guidance throughout this journey.  
Heartfelt appreciation is extended to Woodrow's wife, Hazel Mae F. Merida, for her unwavering support and  
encouragement, and to his son, Woodrow Aziel F. Merida, whose strength and inspiration have been a constant  
source of motivation. Gratitude is also expressed to his mother, Eulalia B. Merida, for her steadfast prayers and  
spiritual guidance, and to his brother Bracquel B. Merida, who provided invaluable technical assistance  
throughout this endeavor.  
The authors also extend sincere thanks to Dr. Arturo B. Bayocot, Regional Director of DepEd Region X, for  
granting permission to conduct this study within the region. Appreciation is likewise extended to the Schools  
Division Superintendents for allowing the participation of their Human Resource Development Units in the  
Focus Group Discussions. The dedication, expertise, and thoughtful contributions of the HRD Specialists from  
the various Divisions of DepEd Region X significantly enriched this research and are deeply valued.  
To everyone acknowledged here, the authors offer their sincerest gratitude for their invaluable contributions,  
without which this work would not have been possible.  
About the Author  
Woodrow Wilson Balandra Merida is a dedicated educator and researcher affiliated with the Department of  
Education - Division of Malaybalay City, Philippines, where he serves as a Senior Education Program Specialist  
for Human Resource Development. As a member of the Division Research Team under the Human Resource  
Development category, he actively contributes to advancing research in the field. His primary research interests  
include both qualitative and quantitative studies on human resource development practices, focusing on  
innovative strategies and approaches to improve educational systems and workforce development. He is an  
active member of the National Employees Union and the Philippine Eagles Club, demonstrating his commitment  
to professional and civic engagement. Additionally, he serves as the Professional Regulation Commission -  
Continuous Professional Development Division Focal Person, ensuring the seamless implementation of  
programs that enhance professional growth. Through his work, Woodrow remains steadfast in his mission to  
foster excellence and development within the education sector and beyond.  
REFERENCES  
The references section should contain all the identification elements of the consulted sources. Some examples:  
Page 1456  
1. Afzal A., Khan S, Daud S, & Ahme Z, 2023. Addressing the Digital Divide: Access and Use of  
Technology in Education. Journal of Social Sciences Review 3: 883895. doi: 10.54183/jssr.v3i2.326  
2. Al-Suraihi WA, Siti A, Al-Suraihi AA, Ibrahim I, 2021. Employee Turnover: Causes, Importance, and  
Retention Strategies. European Journal of Business Management and Research 6: 10. doi:  
3. Arañas, J. (2023). Tasks beyond Instruction: A Case Study on Teachers’ Ancillary Functions.  
International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research 2: 179-186. doi: 10.31949/ijeir.v2i2.5740  
4. Arulsamy AS, Singh I, Kumar S, Jetal D, 2023. Employee training and development enhancing  
employee  
performance:  
A
study.  
November 2024  
5. Asiyah S, Wiyono BB, Hidayah N, Supriyanto A, 2021. The Effect of Professional Development,  
Innovative Work, and Work Commitment on the Quality of Teacher Learning In Elementary Schools  
of Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 95: 227246. https://www.ejer.com.tr.  
Accessed 23 November 2024  
6. Ayagbil F, Alda R, 2024. Continuing Professional Development Opportunities: Teachers’ Motivation  
and Perceived Effectiveness. International Journal of Education and Practice 12: 584-595.  
7. Basar ZM, Mansor AN, Jamaludin KA, Alias BS, 2021. The Effectiveness and Challenges of Online  
Learning for Secondary School Students: A Case Study. Asian Journal of University Education 17:  
8. Bello B, Tula ST, Omotoye GB, Kess-Momoh AJ, 2024. Work-Life Balance and Its Impact in Modern  
Organizations: An HR Review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 21: 11621173. doi:  
9. Bowman M, 2014. Teacher Mentoring As a Means to Improve Schools. BU Journal of Graduate Studies  
10. Buabeng-Andoh C, 2012. Factors Influencing Teachers’ Adoption and Integration of Information and  
Communication Technology into Teaching: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of  
Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT) 8: 136-  
11. Civil Service Commission, 2020. Streamlining government operations: Addressing inefficiencies  
through better task allocation. https://www.csc.gov.ph. Accessed 4 November 2024  
12. Corpuz C, 2022. Training needs assessment of teachers: The case of De La Salle University Dasmarinas.  
Accessed 12 October 2024  
13. Creswell JW, Poth CN, 2018. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches  
(4th  
ed.).  
com/enuk/  
cykh/Creswell_and_Poth%  
2C_  
2018%2C_Qualitative_Inquiry_4th/#google_vignette. Accessed 3 October 2024  
14. Culduz M, 2023. The Impact of Educational Leadership in Improving the Learning Experience. doi:  
15. Darling-Hammond L, Hyler, ME, Gardner M, 2017. Effective teacher professional development.  
Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf. Accessed 25 November 2024  
16. Day C, Gu Q, Sammons P, 2016. The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: How Successful  
School Leaders Use Transformational and Instructional Strategies to Make a Difference. Educational  
Administration Quarterly 52: 221258. doi: 10.1177/0013161X15616863  
17. Department of Education (DepEd), 2017. National adoption and implementation of the Philippine  
November 2024  
Page 1457  
18. Department of Education (DepEd), 2021. Workforce alignment and task management in regional  
education offices. https://www.deped.gov.ph/reports. Accessed 9 October 2024  
19. Department of Education (DepEd), 2022. DepEd highlights Digital Rise Program as key player in  
addressing challenges in education quality. https://www.deped.gov.ph/ 2022/05/10/ deped- highlights-  
October 2024  
20. DepEd Order No. 024, 2022. Adoption of the basic education development plan 2030.  
21. DepEd Order No. 024, 2020. National adoption and implementation of the Philippine professional  
.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2024  
22. Ekins A, 2021. Understanding and Supporting Students with Social, Emotional, and Mental Health  
Needs: A Practical Guide for Staff in Schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory 54: 613-614. doi:  
23. Garcia E, Weiss E, 2021. The pandemic has exacerbated a long-standing national teacher shortage: A  
comprehensive analysis of the teacher workforce crisis in the United States. Economic Policy Institute.  
24. Gorospe JD, Edaniol EC, 2022. Resistance to Change and Work Engagement of the Faculty of  
Occidental Mindoro State College, Philippines. Journal of Practical Studies in Education 3: 1-8. doi:  
25. Hill SEM, Ward WL, Seay A, Buzenski J, 2022. The Nature and Evolution of the Mentoring  
Relationship in Academic Health Centers. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 29: 557–  
26. Hollister B, Nair P, Hill-Lindsay S, Chukoskie L, 2022. Engagement in Online Learning: Student  
Attitudes  
and  
Behavior  
during  
COVID-19.  
Frontiers  
in  
Education  
7:  
1-16.  
27. Ingersoll RM, Strong MA, 2011. The Impact of Induction and Mentoring Programs for Beginning  
Teachers: A Critical Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research 81: 201233. doi:  
28. Jubaidi D, Khoirunnisa K, 2023. Optimizing human resource development through integrated education  
and  
training  
programs.  
Accessed 17 October 2024  
29. Kahmann R, Droop M, Lazonder AW, 2022. Meta-analysis of Professional Development Programs in  
Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Educational Research 116: 102072. doi:  
30. Keinänen AL, Lähdesmäki R, Juntunen J, Tuomikoski AM, Kääriäinen M, Mikkonen K, 2023.  
Effectiveness of Mentoring Education on Health Care Professionals' Mentoring Competence: A  
Systematic Review. Nurse Education Today 121: 105709. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105709  
31. Keltu TT, 2024. The Effect of Human Resource Development Practice on Employee Performance with  
the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction among Mizan Tepi University's Academic Staff in Southwestern  
Ethiopia. Heliyon 10: e29821. doi: 10.1016/ j.heliyon. 2024.e29821  
32. Kushwaha A, Mathura KK, Kushwaha RK, Ahmad S, 2024. Transforming learning: The power of  
educational  
technology.  
33. Llego MA, 2021. DepEd RPMS-PPST guide for teachers. https://www.teacherph.com/rpms-ppst/.  
Accessed 23 November 2024  
34. Mallillin LL, 2023. Educational Leadership Management Practices: A Perspective to Educational  
Transformation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis 6: 1249-1266. doi:  
Page 1458  
35. Mazzetti G, Schaufeli WB, 2022. The Impact of Engaging Leadership on Employee Engagement and  
Team Effectiveness: A Longitudinal, Multi-Level Study on the Mediating Role of Personal snd Team  
Resources. PLOS ONE 17: e0269433. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0269433  
36. Musaigwa M, 2023. The Role of Leadership in Managing Change. International Review of  
Management and Marketing 13: 19. doi: 10.32479/irmm.13526  
37. Murphy KA, 2024. Assessment of Employee Well-Being on Organizational Effectiveness and  
Productivity: A Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Management 19: 26. doi:  
38. Namada J, 2018. Organizational learning and competitive advantage. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3725-  
39. Okolie UC, Omole OG, Yakubu A, 2021. Leadership and Effective Human Resource Management in  
Organizations. RUDN Journal of Public Administration 8: 277296. doi: 10.22363/2312-8313-2021-8-  
40. Padillo GG, Manguilimotan RP, Capuno RG, & Espina RC, 2021. Professional Development Activities  
and Teacher Performance. International Journal of Education and Practice 9: 497506. doi:  
41. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K, 2015. Purposeful Sampling  
for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.  
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42: 533-544. doi:  
42. Parpucu H, Al-Mabuk R, 2023. The Role of Feedback in Teacher Professional Development. EIKI  
Journal of Effective Teaching Methods 1: 1-14. doi: 10.59652/jetm.v1i4.77  
43. Pratama IN, Dachyar M, Rhezza N. 2023. Optimization of Resource Allocation and Task Allocation  
with Project Management Information Systems in Information Technology Companies. TEM Journal  
44. Rai J, Beresford-Dey M, 2023. School leadership in the United Arab Emirates: A Scoping Review.  
Educational Management Administration & Leadership 4: 34-45. doi: 10.1177/17411432231218129  
45. Rajasinghe D, Garvey B, Burt S, Barosa-Pereira A, Clutterbuck D, 2024. Innovative Interpretative  
Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) Approach in a Coaching Research Project: Implications for Future  
Qualitative Coaching Research and Beyond. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research  
and Practice 17: 301-318. doi: 10.1080/17521882.2024.2358771  
46. Sugot JRLP, Ladia BCB, 2024. Impact of Classroom Observation Tool and Results-Based Performance  
Management System on Elementary School Teacher Performance. Cognizance Journal of  
Multidisciplinary Studies 4: 257271. doi: 10.47760/ cognizance. 2024.v04i04.018  
47. Tanjung BN, 2020. Human Resources (HR) in Education Management. Budapest International  
Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal 3: 1240-1249. doi:  
48. Tarraya H, 2023. Teachers’ workload policy: Its impact on Philippine public school teachers.  
49. Tarusha F, Bushi J, 2024. The Role of Classroom Observation, Its Impact on Improving Teacher’s  
Teaching Practices. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences 2: 718723. doi:  
50. Thahir M, Komariah A, Kurniady, DA, Suharto N, 2021. Professional Development and Job  
Satisfaction  
on  
Teaching  
Performance.  
Linguistics  
and  
Culture  
Review  
5:  
S4.  
51. To J, Tan K, Lim M, 2023. From Error-Focused To Learner-Centred Feedback Practices: Unpacking  
the Development of Teacher Feedback Literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education 131: Article 104185.  
52. UNESCO, 2019. Teacher-to-student ratios and their impact on regional educational outcomes.  
https://unesdoc.unesco.org. Accessed 17 October 2024  
Page 1459