A comparative analysis of the values of Generation X and Generation  
Y in India  
Dr. Arpita Kaul, Ankit Satija, Karnika Pagaria, Harsh Gupta  
Sri Venkateswara College  
Received: 03 December 2025; Accepted: 09 December 2025; Published: 19 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The overall purpose of the study was to identify, compare and analyse the attitudes and behavior of Generation  
X and Generation Y in India. For this study the age cohort of the generation X and generation Y was identified.  
The people born in between 1965-79 are classified as Generation X while those born in between 1980-96 are  
classified as Generation Y. After a vast literature review Rokeach Value Survey was selected for data collection  
purpose. The survey consists two sets of values, i.e. Terminl Values and Instrumental Values with each set  
containing 18 work values. The questionnaire was shared with 200 people from generation X and Y each. Out  
of 200, 82 people responded from each generation.  
On the basis of the survey, a comparative analysis was done with the help of Mann Whitney Test. Key differences  
and similarities were pointed out and implications were discussed.  
Keywords-Generation X, Generation Y, Terminal Values, Instrumental Values  
INTRODUCTION  
Generational differences, especially between Gen X and Gen Y have been an important subject of much  
academic research for years (Acar, 2014). People born in between 1965-79 are classified as Generation X while  
those born in between 1980-96 as Generation Y for the purpose of this study. Generation X or “Baby Busters”  
is more likely to focus on family and quality of life, rather than exerting their efforts in their careers (Patterson,  
2007). Known by the names “the Net Generation”, “Millennials' ', “Echo Boomers”, “iGeneration”, Generation  
Y is believed to be confident, optimistic and multi-tasking which brings with it technical competence, high speed  
and energy into the workplace (Kim 2008). Do both Generations X and Y have different rankings for values?  
This study aims at finding out the differences and similarities in priority of values of Gen X and Gen Y if any.  
Due to increasing pace of Globalisation, Generation Y got everything they could ask for, ranging from  
international exposure to setting up of corporate carriers online and economic independence, as it was the period  
when India's economy was at its peak, whereas, on the other hand, Generation X had to go through a lot of  
struggling phases which also shaped it that way. This made them become more self-sufficient & resourceful in  
nature. In comparison to previous generations, Generation X was exposed more to a higher level of education,  
which was lacking before and hence, they tend to become more cynical. Migration from rural to urban areas led  
to emergence of nuclear families, demonstrating change in family structure for Generation Y which gave it a  
new sense of freedom and identity and made it collectivist in nature.  
Existence of political instability in their period led Generation X to grow up under the umbrella blanket of fear  
and violence altogether. During this phase, they learned to raise their voices, and became more liberal to other's  
perspectives. Generation Y, on the other hand, grew up in a more civilized & economically sound society. Both  
the Generations saw the rise in technical innovations due to drastic growth in the technology sector. Generation  
X began to adapt to things like Televisions, telephones and tape recorders while Generation Y saw the rise in  
social networking sites and stood stronger than ever in raising their voices.  
Page 1587  
Objectives  
The main objectives of this research work can be summed up as:  
1. To comparatively analyse values of Generation X (1965-79) and Generation Y (1980-95) in India.  
2. To examine what instrumental and terminal values Generation X and Y prefer.  
This research work deals with inspection of various characteristics of Generation X and Y which will be helpful  
to Human Resource Practitioners in formulating strategies for employees belonging to Generation X and Y  
which amount to more than 40% out of the total population.  
Hypothesis  
The study has the following hypothesis:  
H1: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘comfortable life’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H2: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘equality’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H3: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘an exciting life’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H4: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘family security’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H5: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘freedom’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H6: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘health’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
H7: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘inner harmony’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H8: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘mature love’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H9: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘national security’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H10: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘pleasure’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H11: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘salvation’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H12: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘self-respect’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H13: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘sense of accomplishment’  
between generation X and generation Y.  
H14: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘social recognition’  
Page 1588  
between generation X and generation Y.  
H15: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘true friendship’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H16: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘wisdom’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H17: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘a world of peace’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H18: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of terminal value ‘a world of beauty’  
between generation X and generation Y.  
H19: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘ambitious’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H20: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘broadminded’  
between generation X and generation Y.  
H21: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘capable’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H22: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘clean’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H23: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘courageous’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H24: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘forgiving’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H25: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘helpful’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H26: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘honest’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H27: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘imaginative’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H28: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘independent’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H29: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘intellectual’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H30: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘logical’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H31: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘loving’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H32: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘loyal’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Page 1589  
H33: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘obedient’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H34: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘polite’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H35: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘responsible’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
H36: There is a statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of instrumental value ‘self controlled’  
between generation X and generation Y.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
Managers of the 21st century are dealing with a new problem of managing multi-generational diversity in the  
organization (Ivancevich, 2000). Gursoy emphasised that although age-diversity can bring new perspectives and  
add significant value to an organization, it also poses interesting challenges for leadership and effective  
management (Gursoy et al., 2008).  
That’s why the researchers today argue that organizations need to pay close attention to their multi-generational  
workforce, including their corresponding stereotypical behaviors (Salopek, 2000; Smola and Sutton, 2002;  
Tulgan, 2004). Efforts made by managers to understand where the employees are coming from would help them  
effectively manage and deal with employee issues, conflict-resolution and leverage that knowledge to bring out  
the best of their potential.  
For the purpose of the study we will put our focus only on two generations i.e Generation X also known by the  
names, “Baby Busters”, “Twenty something”, and the “F-you generation” (Roberts & Manolis, 2000) and  
Generation Y or millennials, the youngest generation in the current workforce that are believed to be socially  
conscious, yet highly cynical and narcissistic (Twenge et al. 2008).  
Table 1 shows a comparison of chronologies used to assign people born in a certain year to a generation as  
defined by the sources listed in column one.  
Authors, Years  
Range of birth years Range of birth years for Generation  
for Generation X  
Y
Strauss & Howe, 1991  
Jurkiewicz, 2000  
1965-1980  
1981-2000  
1963-1981  
Lancester and Stillman, 2002  
1965-1980  
1981-1999  
Jeffries & Hunte, 2004; Kupperschmidt, 2000;  
Patterson, 2007; Reynolds, 2008; Smola &  
Sutton, 2002  
The birth year is variously stated as  
beginning between 1979 and 1982 and  
ending in the late 1990s  
Lancester, 2004  
Sheahan P, 2005  
1965-1981  
1982-2002  
1978-1994  
Page 1590  
Benckendorff  
Strauss,2000  
et  
al.,2010,  
Howe  
and  
1978-1994  
1978-2000  
Barton & Skiba, 2006; Patterson, 2007; Smola 1965-1977  
& Sutton, 2002  
Fernandez, 2009  
1965-1977  
1978-1990  
1982-2005  
Howell, Lydia Pleotis; Joad, Jesse P., 1961-1981  
Callahan, Edward; Servis, Gregg; Bonham,  
Ann C., 2009  
Crampton S.M & Hodge J. W, 2009  
Angeline, 2011  
1965-1979  
1965-1980  
1961-1979  
1965-1979  
1965-1976  
1980-1999  
1981-2001  
1980-1999  
1980-2000  
1977-1995  
1981-1991  
1980-2000  
Gurau, 2012  
Raina, 2013  
Bejtkovsky, Jifi, 2016  
Khera, S.M. & Malik, S. 2017  
Arora, N & Dhole, V, 2019  
Table 1: Research studies mentioning range of birth for Generation X and Generation Y  
It is important to acknowledge that there is a great deal of variance among the distinguishing characteristics  
within any generation stated, and thus it is unjustified to assume that if a person was born in 1985, he/she would  
have most of the characteristics of the Generation Y and likewise for Generation X. Something that is universally  
true doesn’t necessarily translate to be true for each individual.  
For the purpose of the study we have considered those born between 1965 to 1979 as Gen X and those born  
between 1980 to 1996 as Gen Y.  
According to Hammill (2005), the first thing to consider is the individual and his or her underlying values,  
lifestyle characteristics and workplace characteristics, which seem to correspond with each generation, as shown  
in Table 2.  
Table 2: Research Studies mentioning values of Generation X and Generation Y  
Views Towards  
Core values  
GEN X  
GEN Y  
Individualism Ambitious Self Reliant Most independent Ethical and socially responsible  
&
Pragmatic  
(Chen&  
Choi, (Howe& Strauss,2000)  
2008)  
Work Attitude  
Family  
Calm and  
J 2014)  
composed (Anitha, Self-motivated, efficient, and proactive. (Anitha, J  
2014)  
Focus on family and quality of Family-oriented, open minded in that they tend to  
life (Gibson, Greenwood,  
Murphy ,2009)  
and overlook differences among people and treat everyone  
Page 1591  
the same, deeply committed to authenticity (Leo, 2003;  
Raines, 2002).  
Work ethics & Hardship, self-sufficient, belief in Fun working environment, non-monetary perks as well  
values  
hierarchy  
and  
a
socialist as flexible hours are important (Cole et al., 2002).  
economy(Beutell and Witting-Berman  
2008)  
Nature  
Pessimistic (Cole et al., 2002).  
Optimistic (Cole et al., 2002).  
Education  
Highly  
Choi, 2008)  
educated  
(Chen& Most affluent, educated, and diverse,willing to take up  
challenges (Howe & Strauss, 2004)  
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
The aim of this research work is to do a comparative analysis of the values that affect Generation X and Y in  
India.  
Type and Source of Data  
Primary and secondary data have been used for the study. The primary data has been collected through  
circulation of questionnaire which was designed as per the Rokeach Value System which consisted of two sets  
of values, i.e. Terminal Values and Instrumental Values with each set containing 18 work values. The  
questionnaire was taken from an existing study of the Rokeach Value survey and is secondary in nature.  
Tools and Techniques  
In this study, various tools and techniques have been used ranging from varied statistical tools for analyzing and  
interpreting the responses of the respondents. Skewness and Kurtosis were used to analyze normality of the data.  
In order to further compare the values of the 2 generation Mann Whitney U test has been used on Predictive  
Analysis Software Software Package for Social Sciences.  
Population  
The population targeted for this study was Generation X and Y. People born in the years from 1965 to 1979  
(Crampton S. M & Hodge J. W,2009) were considered Generation X (aged 42 to 56) and the ones born from  
1980 to 1995 were considered Generation Y (aged 26 to 41).  
For the purpose of this report, unless indicated otherwise, the focus is on Generation X and Y who are at least  
26 years old and at most 56 years old, working or not working. This study examines their work preferences,  
lifestyles and life priorities. Most of the information in this report is based on the findings derived from the  
survey.  
Sample  
For the purpose of this study, Non-Probability Sampling has been used. Convenience Sampling is a non-  
probability sampling technique, wherein both questionnaires were circulated among colleagues, family and  
friends. The rationale behind choosing this method was its speed, cost- effectiveness and ease of availability of  
the sample. Also because the population has similar traits.  
Furthermore, snowball sampling has also been used which involves a primary data source nominating other  
potential data sources that will be able to participate in the research studies. This method is also enabled to  
include hidden populace. Moreover, it was also helpful in collecting data in a cost-effective manner, consuming  
less time.  
Page 1592  
Sample Size  
The questionnaire was shared with 200 people from generation X and Y each. Out of 200, 82 people responded  
from each generation. These filled questionnaires have been used to analyse the attitudes and values of both the  
generations to draw logical comparisons between them.  
Analysis  
First and foremost normality of the data was checked using SPSS and calculating skewness and kurtosis for both  
the groups i.e. generation x and generation y. Since the data was found to be non normal and we had categorical  
and ordinal data the best tool to be used was found to be Mann Whitney U test.  
Table 3: Ranks  
Generation  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
N
Mean Rank  
71.84  
Sum of Ranks  
5891.00  
1 Comfortable life  
2 Equality  
82  
71  
82.96  
5890.00  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
81.07  
72.30  
6648.00  
5133.00  
71  
153  
82  
3 An exciting life  
4 Family security  
5 Freedom  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
85.51  
67.17  
7012.00  
4769.00  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
65.74  
90.01  
5390.50  
6390.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
79.84  
73.73  
6546.50  
5234.50  
71  
153  
82  
6 Health  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
69.47  
85.70  
5696.50  
6084.50  
71  
153  
82  
7 Inner harmony  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
72.97  
81.65  
5983.50  
5797.50  
71  
153  
82  
8 Mature love  
Page 1593  
Generation X  
82.79  
6788.50  
Generation Y  
Total  
71  
70.32  
4992.50  
153  
82  
9 National security  
10 Pleasure  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
83.17  
69.87  
6820.00  
4961.00  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
75.43  
78.82  
6185.00  
5596.00  
71  
153  
82  
11 Salvation  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
82.52  
70.63  
6766.50  
5014.50  
71  
153  
82  
12 Self-respect  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
80.55  
72.90  
6605.00  
5176.00  
71  
153  
82  
13  
Sense  
of Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
73.60  
80.93  
6035.00  
5746.00  
accomplishment  
71  
153  
82  
14 Social recognition  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
71.46  
83.39  
5860.00  
5921.00  
71  
153  
82  
15 True friendship  
16 Wisdom  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
72.95  
81.68  
5982.00  
5799.00  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
74.55  
79.83  
6113.00  
5668.00  
71  
153  
82  
17 A world of peace  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
82.41  
70.75  
6758.00  
5023.00  
71  
153  
82  
18 A world of beauty  
Page 1594  
Generation X  
71.62  
5873.00  
Generation Y  
Total  
71  
83.21  
5908.00  
153  
82  
19 Ambitious  
20 Broadminded  
21 Capable  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
90.95  
60.89  
7457.50  
4323.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
85.03  
67.73  
6972.50  
4808.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
83.44  
69.56  
6842.00  
4939.00  
71  
153  
82  
22 Clean  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
75.52  
78.70  
6193.00  
5588.00  
71  
153  
82  
23 Courageous  
24 Forgiving  
25 Helpful  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
80.47  
72.99  
6598.50  
5182.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
78.93  
74.77  
6472.50  
5308.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
71.06  
83.86  
5827.00  
5954.00  
71  
153  
82  
26 Honest  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
72.57  
82.11  
5951.00  
5830.00  
71  
153  
82  
27 Imaginative  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
88.01  
64.29  
7216.50  
4564.50  
71  
153  
82  
28 Independent  
Page 1595  
Generation X  
79.52  
6520.50  
Generation Y  
Total  
71  
74.09  
5260.50  
153  
82  
29 Intellectual  
30 Logical  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
72.73  
81.93  
5964.00  
5817.00  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
78.52  
75.24  
6439.00  
5342.00  
71  
153  
82  
31 Loving  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
71.91  
82.88  
5896.50  
5884.50  
71  
153  
82  
32 Loyal  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
73.91  
80.57  
6060.50  
5720.50  
71  
153  
82  
33 Obedient  
34 Polite  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
66.01  
89.70  
5412.50  
6368.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
68.34  
87.01  
5603.50  
6177.50  
71  
153  
82  
35 Responsible  
36 Self controlled  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
71.52  
83.33  
5864.50  
5916.50  
71  
153  
82  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Total  
65.69  
90.06  
5386.50  
6394.50  
71  
153  
Test Statisticsa  
Comfortable  
Life  
Equality  
An Exciting  
Life  
Family Security  
1987.500  
Freedom  
2678.500  
Health  
Mann-Whitney U  
Page 1596  
2488.000  
2577.000 2213.000  
2293.500  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
5891.000  
-1.560  
.119  
5133.000 4769.000  
5390.500  
-3.420  
5234.500  
-.855  
5696.500  
-2.289  
.022  
-1.225  
.220  
-2.559  
.011  
Asymp. Sig. (2-  
tailed)  
<.001  
.393  
Test Statisticsa  
Inner  
Maturelove  
National Security  
Pleasure  
Salvation  
Selfrespect  
Harmony  
Mann-Whitney U  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
2580.500  
5983.500  
-1.215  
2436.500  
4992.500  
-1.741  
2405.000  
4961.000  
-1.857  
2782.000  
6185.000  
-.474  
2458.500  
5014.500  
-1.665  
2620.000  
5176.000  
-1.069  
Asymp. Sig. (2-  
tailed)  
.224  
.082  
.063  
.636  
.096  
.285  
Test Statisticsa  
Sense  
Of social recognition  
True Friendship  
wisdom  
Aworldofpeace  
Accomplishment  
Mann-Whitney U  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
2632.000  
6035.000  
-1.027  
2457.000  
5860.000  
-1.669  
2579.000  
5982.000  
-1.219  
2710.000  
6113.000  
-.738  
2467.000  
5023.000  
-1.642  
Asymp. Sig. (2- .305  
tailed)  
.095  
.223  
.461  
.101  
Test Statisticsa  
Aworldofb Ambitious  
Broadminded  
Capable  
Clean  
Courageous  
eauty  
Mann-Whitney U  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
2470.000  
1767.500  
4323.500  
-4.228  
2252.500  
4808.500  
-2.424  
2383.000  
4939.000  
-1.938  
2790.000  
6193.000  
-.444  
2626.500  
5182.500  
-1.046  
5873.000  
-1.649  
Asymp. Sig. (2- .099  
tailed)  
<.001  
.015  
.053  
.657  
.296  
Test Statisticsa  
Forgiving  
Helpful  
Honest  
Imaginative  
Independent Intellectual  
Page 1597  
Mann-Whitney U  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
2752.500  
5308.500  
-.582  
2424.000  
5827.000  
-1.790  
2548.000 2008.500  
5951.000 4564.500  
2704.500  
5260.500  
-.758  
2561.000  
5964.000  
-1.287  
-1.336  
.182  
-3.318  
<.001  
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)  
.561  
.073  
.448  
.198  
Test Statisticsa  
Logical  
Mann-Whitney U 2786.000  
Loving  
Loyal  
Obedient  
Polite  
Responsible  
2493.500  
5896.500  
-1.533  
2657.500  
6060.500  
-.931  
2009.500  
5412.500  
-3.323  
2200.500  
5603.500  
-2.609  
2461.500  
5864.500  
-1.650  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
5342.000  
-.459  
Asymp. Sig. (2- .646  
tailed)  
.125  
.352  
<.001  
.009  
.099  
Self controlled  
Mann-Whitney U  
Wilcoxon W  
Z
1983.500  
5386.500  
-3.415  
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)  
<.001  
a. Grouping Variable: Gener  
Value  
Hypothesis  
Difference is Generation whose Mean  
significant or Rank is higher  
not  
Comfortable  
life  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘comfortable life’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Equality  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘equality’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
An exciting There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
life  
mean ranks of value ‘an exciting life’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Family  
Security  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘family security’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Page 1598  
Freedom  
Health  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘freedom’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘health’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Inner  
Harmony  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘inner harmony’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Mature Love  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘mature love’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
National  
Security  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘national security’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Pleasure  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘pleasure’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Salvation  
Self-respect  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘salvation’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean  
ranks  
of value  
‘self-respect’  
between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Sense  
of There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
accomplishm mean ranks of value ‘sense of accomplishment’  
ent  
between generation X and generation Y.  
Social  
recognition  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘social recognition’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
True  
friendship  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘true friendship’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Wisdom  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘wisdom’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
A world of There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
peace  
mean ranks of value ‘a world of peace’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
A world of There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
beauty  
mean ranks of value ‘a world of beauty’ between  
Page 1599  
generation X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘ambitious’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
Ambitious  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Generation X  
Generation Y  
Broadminded There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘broadminded’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
Capable  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘capable’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Clean  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘clean’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Courageous  
Forgiving  
Helpful  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘courageous’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘forgiving’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘helpful’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Honest  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘honest’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Imaginative  
Independent  
Intellectual  
Logical  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value  
‘imaginative’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘independent’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘intellectual’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘logical’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Loving  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘loving’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Page 1600  
Loyal  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘loyal’ between generation X and  
generation Y.  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Generation Y  
Obedient  
Polite  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘obedient’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘polite’ between generation X  
and generation Y.  
Responsible  
There is a statistically significant difference in the No  
mean ranks of value ‘responsible’ between generation  
X and generation Y.  
Self  
controlled  
There is a statistically significant difference in the Yes  
mean ranks of value ‘self controlled’ between  
generation X and generation Y.  
FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS  
There is no statistically significant difference between the mean ranks of terminal values; comfortable life,  
equality, freedom, inner harmony, mature love, national security, pleasure, salvation, self respect, sense of  
accomplishment, social recognition, true friendship and wisdom, world of peace and world of beauty.  
There is a statistically significant difference between the mean ranks of terminal values; an exciting life, family  
security and health.  
For terminal value; exciting life, Generation X has a higher mean rank than that of Generation Y.  
For terminal value; family security, Generation Y has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X.  
For terminal value; health, Generation Y has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X.  
There is no statistically significant difference between the mean ranks of instrumental values; capable, clean,  
courageous, forgiving, helpful, honest, independent, intellectual, logical, loving, loyal and responsible.  
There is a statistically significant difference between instrumental values; ambitious, broad minded, imaginative,  
obedient, polite and self controlled.  
For instrumental value; ambitious, Generation X has a higher mean rank than that of Generation Y.  
For instrumental value; broad minded, Generation X has a higher mean rank than that of Generation Y.  
For instrumental value; imaginative, Generation X has a higher mean rank than that of Generation Y.  
For instrumental value; Obedient, Generation Y has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X.  
For instrumental value; polite, Generation Y has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X.  
For instrumental value; self controlled, Generation Y has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X.  
Page 1601  
CONCLUSION  
For terminal value; exciting life, Generation X has a higher mean rank (85.51) than that of Generation Y(67.17).  
As the difference in the mean ranks of Generation X and Generation Y is significant, it means that Generation  
X values exciting life more than Generation Y. For terminal value; family security, Generation Y (90.01) has a  
higher mean rank than that of Generation X (65.74). As the difference in the mean ranks of both the generations  
is significant it means that Generation Y values family security more than Generation X. It can also be seen that  
Generation Y values family security more than an exciting life and Generation X values an exciting life more  
than family security. The reason can be that government jobs were easily available in the working period of  
Generation X as compared to the working period of Generation Y. So, as Generation X had the option of family  
security it was of less importance to them while on the other hand, Generation Y saw the period of less permanent  
jobs and more contractual jobs thus, for them family security was more important. In addition to this, Gen Yers  
parents adored them and feed them with self-confidence as indicated by Tulgan (2004), thus for them, family is  
the main institution that shapes their values and provides them unconditional love and security which can also  
be the reason for them to give value to family security.  
Generation Y (85.70) has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X (69.47) incase of health, with a significant  
level of difference between the mean ranks. This means that health is valued more by Generation Y than  
Generation X. Generation X in India did not have access to much adulterated food and outside food as compared  
to Generation X. With the advent of the LPG era (Liberalisation, Privatisation and Globalization) the food joints  
like KFC, Burger King, McDonalds, Dunkin Doughnuts entered India and even Indians started with food joints  
like Burger Singh also entered this market. With this came to Healthy food companies like Subway, Andhra  
Bhawan, Sarwan Bhavan also joined the race. Generation X still prefers make ke roti, sarso ka saag topped with  
desi ghee and hence are not very worried about their health on the other hand Generation Y loves ordering food  
from Swiggy and Zomato therefore are aware and concerned about their health. This health consciousness of  
millenials has made employers offer health and medical benefits as perquisites to their employees seeking that  
people of this generation are more willing to spend money on fitness, healthy food, and self-care. But as health  
care costs become more and more unpredictable, millennials have learned to do their research beforehand and  
thus prefer jobs with more healthcare benefits. Also, many companies have gym in their own premises.  
For instrumental value; ambitious, Generation X has a higher mean rank (90.95) than that of Generation Y  
(60.89). The difference between the mean ranks of the 2 generations is significant. For instrumental value; broad  
minded, Generation X (85.03) has a higher mean rank than that of Generation Y (67.73). The difference between  
the 2 generations is significant. Ambition and broad mindedness go hand in hand and mean ranks for both of  
these for both the generations are also showing that only.  
For instrumental value; imaginative, Generation X (88.01) has a higher mean rank than that of Generation Y  
(64.29). The difference between the mean ranks of the 2 generations is significant. It means generation X values  
imagination more than generation Y. For instrumental value; Obedient, Generation Y has a higher mean rank  
(89.7) than that of Generation X (66.01) with a significant difference between the mean ranks.  
For instrumental value; polite, Generation Y (87.01) has a higher mean rank than that of Generation X (68.34)  
with a significant difference in the mean ranks. This shows that generation Y prefer managers who are well-  
mannered and use positive, respectful, motivational communication style. Unlike generation X who were  
parented by strict parents and grandparents, most millennials of India grew up in nuclear families; brought by  
helicopter parents belonging from Generation X and thus are versed with polite and mostly positive feedback.  
For instrumental value; self controlled, Generation Y(90.06) has a higher mean rank than that of Generation  
X(65.69) with a significant difference between the means. Due to this self-disciplined nature of millennials,  
employers are no more very particular with timings and deadlines. Generation Y themselves value the norms  
and thus do not need any reminders. The success of new found work from home trend is also reasoned with the  
self-controlled nature of millennial employees.  
Based on the discussion above we can conclude that for Generation X an exciting life (85.51) is the top most  
terminal value and for Generation Y, family security (90.01) is the top most terminal value. For Generation X,  
Page 1602  
the top most instrumental values are ambitious (90.95), imaginative (88.01) and broad minded (85.03). For  
Generation Y, the top most instrumental values are; self-controlled (90.06), obedient (89.7) and polite (87.01).  
REFERENCES  
1. Acar, D. A. (2014). Do Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Factors Differ for Generation X and Y?  
International Journal of Business and Social Science.  
2. Angeline, T. (2011). Managing generational diversity at the workplace: African Journal of Business  
Management , 5(2), 249-255.  
3. Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance.  
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308-323.  
4. Armour, S. (2005). Generation Y: They arrived at work with a new attitude. USA Today.  
5. Arora, N. and Dhole, V. (2019), "Generation Y: Perspective, engagement, expectations, preferences and  
satisfactions from workplace; a study conducted in Indian context", Benchmarking: An International  
Journal, 26(5), 1378-1404  
6. Auby, Karen (2008), “A Boomer‟s Guide to Communicating with Generation X and Generation Y”,  
Business Week, August 25, 63.  
7. Barton, A.J. & Skiba, D.J. (2006). Adapting your teaching to accommodate the next generation of  
learners. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2), 15-25.  
8. Benckendorf, P., Moscardo, G. and Pendergast, D. (Eds.) (2010), Tourism and Generation Y, CABI,  
Wallingford, UK  
9. BEJTKOVSKÝ, Jiří. The employees of baby boomers generation, Generation X, Generation Y and  
Generation Z in selected Czech corporations as conceivers of development and competitiveness in their  
corporation. Journal of Competitiveness [online]. 2016, 8(4), 105-123.  
10. Beutell, Nicholas J. and Ursula Wittig-Berman (2008), Work-Family Conflict and Work-Family Synergy  
for Generation X, Baby Boomers, and Matures: Generational Differences, Predictors, and Satisfaction  
Outcomes, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 507.  
11. Chen, Po-Ju., & Choi, Y. (2008). Generational differences in work values: a study of hospitality  
management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(6), 595-615. DeSouza.  
12. Cole, G., Lucas, L., & Smith, R. (2002). The debut of generation y in the American workforce. Journal  
of Business Administration Online, 1(2), 1-10.  
13. Crampton, S. M., & Hodge, J. W. (2009). Generation Y: Unchartered Territory. Journal of Business &  
Economics Research (JBER), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i4.2272  
14. Deloitte Global, THE DELOITTE GLOBAL 2021 MILLENNIAL AND GEN Z SURVEY, 2021  
15. Fernandez, Susana, Comparing Generation X to Generation Y on work-related beliefs. (2009). Master's  
Theses. 3974  
16. Gibson, J. W., Greenwood, R. A., & Murphy Jr, E. F. (2009). Generational differences in the workplace:  
Personal values, behaviors, and Generation X and Y: Work Attitudes, popular beliefs. Journal of  
Diversity Management (JDM), 4(3), 1- 8.  
17. Gurău, C. (2012), A life‐stage analysis of consumer loyalty profile: comparing Generation X and  
Millennial consumers, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 103-113.  
18. Gursoy, D., Maier, T.A. and Chi, C.G. (2008), Generational differences: an examination of work values  
and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce, International Journal of Hospitality Management,  
27(3), 448-458  
19. Hammill, G. (2005). Mixing and managing four generations of employees. Fairleigh Dickinson  
University FDU Magazine.  
20. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage  
Books.  
21. Hole, D., Zhong, L., & Schwartz, J. (2010). Talking about whose generation? Why western generational  
models can’t account for a global workforce. Issue 6  
22. Howell, Lydia, P. Joad, J. Callahan, Edward, Servis, Gregg, Bonham, Ann C. (2009). PhD Generational  
Forecasting in Academic Medicine: A Unique Method of Planning for Success in the Next Two Decades,  
Academic Medicine, 84( 8) 985-993.  
23. Jeffries, F. L., & Hunte, T. L. (2004). Generations and motivation: A connection worth making. Journal  
Page 1603  
of Behavioral & Applied Management, 6(1), 37-70 Jurkiewicz CL. Generation X and the Public  
Employee. Public Personnel Management. 2000;29, 55- 74.  
24. Khera, S.N. and Malik, S. (2017), "Conceptualizing and measuring life priorities of  
evidences from Indian context", Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(2), 80-86.  
Generation Y:  
25. Kim, D.J., (2008). Generation Gaps in Engineering? Master of Science in Engineering the Massachusetts  
Instıtute of Technology.  
26. Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigenerational employees: Strategies for effective management. The  
Health Care Manager, 66.  
27. Lancaster, L. C. (2004). When Generations Collide: How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at work. The  
Management Forum Series.  
28. Lancaster, L. C., and D. Stillman. 2002. When generations collide: Who they are, why they clash, how  
to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York: HarperCollins  
29. Leo, J. (2003). The good-news generation. U.S. News & World Report, 135(15), 60-61. Patterson, C.  
(2007). The impact of generational diversity in the workplace. The Diversity Factor, 15(3), 17-22.  
30. M. Ivancevich and Jacqueline A - Gilbert Public Personnel Management (2000). Diversity Management:  
Time for a New Approach, International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 3(5).  
31. M. J. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th Ed.). New York:  
Springer Science + Business Media.  
32. Raina, R. (2013), Engaging Indian Millennial @Workplace, Organization Development and Learning  
Partner, Amdocs (India)  
33. Raines, C. (2002). Connecting generations: The sourcebook for a new workplace. Berkeley, CA: Crisp.  
34. Reynolds, L., Bush, E. C., & Geist, R. (2008). The gen Y imperative. Communication World, 25(3), 19  
- 22.  
35. Roberts, J., & Manolis, C. (2000). Baby boomers and busters: An exploratory investigation of attitudes  
toward marketing, advertising and consumerism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 482.  
36. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.  
37. Roongrerngsuke, S. (2010). Attracting and retaining multigenerational workforce in China, India, and  
Thailand”, SHRM Annual conference, 2010 presentation.  
38. Salopek, J. (2000), Generations at work: managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in  
your workplace (book review), Training & Development, 54(1), 60.  
39. Sheahan, P 2005, Generation Y: thriving and surviving with Generation Y at work, Hardy Grant, Prahran.  
40. Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the  
new millennium. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(4), 363 -382.  
41. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991 ). Generations: The history of American's future, 1584-2069. New York:  
William Morrow and Company, Inc.  
42. Tulgan, B. (2004), Trends point to a dramatic generational shift in the future workforce, Employment  
Relations Today, 30(4), 23-31.  
43. Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos inflating over  
time: A cross- temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality,  
76(4), 875-902.  
44. Tyler, Kathryn. (2007), The Tethered Generation, HR Magazine, 52, 40-47.  
45. Tyler, Kathryn (2008), Generation Gaps, HR Magazine, 53, 69-73.  
Webliography  
Page 1604