INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
The Planet’s Pulse: Can Earth Have a Biological Heartbeat?  
Swati Pal  
Senior Assistant Professor Indraprastha College for Women Delhi University, Delhi, India  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110044  
Received: 22 November 2025; Accepted: 28 November 2025; Published: 05 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The question of whether the Earth possesses a biological heartbeat invites a profound interdisciplinary inquiry  
that bridges planetary science, ecology, philosophy, indigenous cosmology, and systems theory. Traditionally,  
Earth has been perceived as an inanimate sphere governed by mechanical forces, yet emerging research across  
climatology, complexity studies, oceanography, geophysics, and biospheric feedback processes suggests that  
the planet demonstrates rhythmic, self-regulating patterns analogous to biological pulse. Atmospheric  
oscillations, carbon absorption cycles, thermohaline circulation, Schumann resonances, geomagnetic pulses,  
vegetation rhythms, and tectonic breathing reveal coordinated fluctuations essential for maintaining  
habitability. These patterns resemble the dynamic equilibrium that a heartbeat sustains within living  
organisms. Indigenous traditions, from the Vedic concept of Pṛthvī Mātā to Andean Pachamama, have long  
regarded Earth as a sentient being with breath and pulse, offering interpretive frameworks that modern science  
is only now rediscovering through empirical observation. Climate disruption, biodiversity collapse, and  
hydrological instability can be understood as planetary arrhythmias—signals of systemic distress triggered by  
human activity. This perspective reframes environmental crisis not simply as degradation of resources but as  
trauma within a living system. Recognizing Earth’s rhythmic coherence challenges anthropocentric models and  
calls for a planetary ethic grounded in kinship rather than dominance. Listening for the planet’s pulse becomes  
both a scientific task and a moral responsibility, suggesting that the future of environmental thought lies in  
integrating measurable planetary rhythms with a renewed philosophy of relational existence. In this sense, the  
heartbeat of Earth is not merely a metaphor but a transformative lens through which humanity may reimagine  
its place within the living world.  
Keywords-planetary rhythm; Gaia theory; Earth system science; complexity and emergence; climate  
destabilization; hydrological cycles; biospheric feedback; Schumann resonance  
INTRODUCTION: Listening for a Heartbeat in a World of Stone and Sky  
If a doctor presses a stethoscope to a human chest, the first thing they listen for is rhythm. Not breath, not  
voice, not movement — rhythm. Life reveals itself in pulses. A heartbeat is more than a biological pump; it is  
a sign of coherence, a synchronization of trillions of cells agreeing on the pace of existence. To ask whether  
the Earth has a heartbeat is to ask whether Earth, too, possesses coherence — whether its oceans, forests,  
winds, animals, clouds, and crust are more than mechanical parts. This question is far older than modern  
laboratories and yet always startling: Can a planet be alive? And if so, does it have a pulse?  
The Earth is usually treated as a sphere of resources rather than a living being. Yet the more we study it, the  
more it resembles an organism: responsive, adaptive, self-regulating, rhythmic. Scientists over the past century  
have documented cycles that behave remarkably like biological heartbeats — oscillations in air pressure,  
rhythmic pulses of ocean currents, breathing-like carbon cycles, and magnetic reversals that resemble neural  
signals. Philosophers and indigenous traditions have long insisted that the Earth is alive; only now is science  
beginning to admit that this intuition may have been right all along.  
James Lovelock’s Gaia Hypothesis (Lovelock, 1979), initially dismissed as poetic speculation, is today  
considered foundational to Earth system science. It proposes that the planet behaves as a single self-regulating  
organism, maintaining conditions favorable to life through complex feedback loops. But Lovelock never went  
so far as to call these rhythms a heartbeat. That question — whether Earth has a pulse — is even more radical,  
for it requires us to redefine what counts as life.  
Page 469  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
This article revisits the question through a blended lens of ecology, philosophy, indigenous wisdom, climate  
science, systems theory, and biophysical research. It attempts to listen, with humility and imagination, for  
signs  
of pulse — not as metaphor alone, but as a legitimate scientific and philosophical inquiry.  
The Meaning of a Heartbeat in Biological and Planetary Contexts  
A heartbeat is not merely a thumping organ. It is a dynamic equilibrium — a balance of contraction and  
expansion, signal and response, intake and release. This rhythm emerges from electrical impulses that ripple  
through cardiac tissue. But the essence of a heartbeat lies in regular fluctuation: a cycle that sustains life by  
renewing it continually.  
The question is whether the planet exhibits similar cycles.  
The Earth’s atmosphere expands and contracts. Ocean currents accelerate and slow. Carbon levels rise and fall  
seasonally, a phenomenon sometimes called “the Earth breathing” (Keeling, 1996). The planet experiences  
multi-decadal oscillations like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) that  
influence weather patterns worldwide. Magnetic fields pulse with irregular but recurring strength, shifting  
poles and re-aligning themselves. These rhythms are not random; they are systemic, interdependent, and often  
self-correcting.  
If the body’s heartbeat keeps blood flowing, the planet’s rhythms keep energy, water, heat, and nutrients  
flowing. Without circulation, a body dies; without these circulatory cycles, Earth becomes uninhabitable.  
The question is no longer whether these rhythms exist — they do — but whether they resemble what we would  
call a pulse.  
Gaia Theory and the Emergence of Planetary Physiology  
Gaia Theory reframed Earth from a passive receiver of cosmic conditions into an active participant in its own  
survival. Lovelock and Lynn Margulis argued that organisms do not merely adapt to Earth; they help shape it.  
For example, early bacterial life transformed the atmosphere by producing oxygen, which in turn created  
conditions for more complex life.  
This co-creative process is similar to how cells form tissues and tissues form organs. Earth, in this view,  
resembles a vast organism whose components collaborate — sometimes deliberately, sometimes incidentally  
— to maintain homeostasis (Lenton, 2016).  
But Gaia Theory focused on self-regulation, not on pulse or rhythm. To propose a “planetary heartbeat” is to  
extend Gaia in a direction many scientists still hesitate to explore. Yet the more we examine the Earth through  
systems theory, the more biological it appears. Researchers are beginning to discuss planetary “vital signs,”  
planetary “metabolism,” and planetary “resilience thresholds.”  
A living system must:  
regulate internal conditions  
respond to stimuli  
maintain dynamic equilibrium  
exhibit coherent rhythms  
Earth does all four.  
If life is defined not by parts but by patterns, rhythms, and relationships, then Earth qualifies.  
Page 470  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
The idea of a planetary heartbeat is not pseudoscience; it is an invitation to reconsider the boundaries of life  
itself.  
Indigenous Cosmologies and the Memory of a Living Earth  
Long before satellites and climate models, indigenous cultures around the world described Earth as a  
breathing, feeling, pulsating being. The Andean cosmovisión speaks of Pachamama, a sentient Earth who  
nourishes and communicates. Australian Aboriginal traditions speak of the land as alive with songlines —  
energetic pathways that resemble neural networks. Many Native American tribes refer to the Earth as “Our  
Mother” not as metaphor, but as ontology.  
Indian cosmology is rich with this view. The Ṛgvedic concept of Pṛthvī Mātā (Earth Mother) describes Earth  
as not merely supporting life but embodying it. Bhūmi Sūkta in the Atharvaveda treats Earth as a conscious  
entity with breath, rhythm, and vitality. The Upanishadic idea of prāṇa — the energy that animates all life —  
was extended by some schools to the Earth itself.  
These traditions never doubted that Earth has a pulse. The question modern science is asking today has been  
answered for millennia by cultures that saw Earth not as a machine but as kin.  
Scientific Evidence: Do Planetary Rhythms Behave Like a Pulse?  
For a heartbeat to exist, we expect three features:  
1. Rhythmic oscillation  
2. Central regulation or coherence  
3. Life-sustaining function  
Let us examine some of Earth’s most profound rhythms.  
Atmospheric Pressure Oscillations  
The Madden–Julian Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation, and ENSO produce rhythmic shifts in pressure that  
influence rainfall, wind, and storms. These oscillations resemble the rhythmic contraction and relaxation of  
biological systems.  
Carbon Cycle “Breathing”  
David Keeling’s measurements at Mauna Loa show annual rises and falls of CO₂ caused by global vegetation  
cycles — a literal inhalation and exhalation pattern (Keeling, 1996).  
Thermohaline Circulation  
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation functions like a circulatory system, transporting heat across  
the world. When it weakens, the Earth experiences climatic “arrhythmias.”  
Geomagnetic Pulses  
Earth’s magnetic field pulses irregularly but purposefully; some geophysicists liken these events to  
neurological storms.  
Vegetation and Soil Moisture Pulsations  
Satellite imagery from NASA’s MODIS sensors shows global greening and browning cycles that resemble  
metabolic surges.  
Page 471  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
Seismic Wave Resonance  
The planet vibrates at certain resonant frequencies known as Schumann resonances, reminiscent of harmonic  
frequencies in biological tissues.  
These cycles are not identical to a heartbeat, but they share fundamental principles: rhythm, coherence, and  
influence over systemic stability.  
The more deeply we study them, the less the metaphor seems like metaphor.  
The Pulse as Crisis Indicator: Climate Change and Rhythm Breakdown  
If Earth has rhythms, then climate change is creating arrhythmias — disturbances in the regularity of these  
cycles. Ocean currents slow down. Seasonal patterns shift unpredictably. Atmospheric oscillations intensify.  
Forest cycles break down due to drought. These disruptions are not unlike cardiac stress.  
The Earth’s “pulse” is being destabilized.  
What does it mean when a planet’s rhythm falters?  
In organisms, arrhythmias indicate stress, shock, or illness. In Earth’s case, rhythm breakdown suggests  
excessive carbon load, biodiversity collapse, ocean warming, and human-induced imbalance. Scientists now  
speak of “planetary tipping points” — thresholds beyond which systems cannot return to their former  
equilibrium. This resembles organ failure.  
This is the moral core of the planetary heartbeat question:  
If Earth is an organism, then climate change is not an external event; it is trauma.  
A New Philosophy of Earth: Between Mechanism and Life  
The idea of Earth as alive has been trapped historically between poetry and science. Mechanistic worldviews  
insist on lifelessness; romantic traditions insist on vitality. But modern systems theory dissolves this polarity.  
Life is not defined by material but by pattern, process, and self-maintaining complexity. Stuart Kauffman  
(1995) argued that life emerges wherever systems sustain themselves through non-equilibrium order. Earth  
does exactly this at a planetary scale. Its atmosphere, oceans, and crust collaborate in complex dances of  
feedback and stability.  
Calling this a heartbeat is not anthropomorphism; it is recognition of pattern.  
If we deny Earth life, we justify exploiting it. If we acknowledge its vitality—even metaphorically—we  
acknowledge our ethical responsibility.  
The philosophical stakes are high.  
When we listen for Earth’s pulse, we are also listening for our own.  
Can a Planet Be a Person? The Ethics of Earth’s Pulse  
Some legal systems are beginning to recognize Earth’s living character. The Whanganui River in New Zealand  
was granted legal personhood in 2017. In India, the Ganga and Yamuna rivers were briefly recognized as  
living entities by the Uttarakhand High Court. Ecuador’s constitution includes rights for “Pachamama”  
(Mother Earth). These movements reflect a growing intuition: If Earth has rhythms like life, it should have  
rights like life.  
Page 472  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
The pulse metaphor strengthens this argument. A being with rhythms, responsiveness, and self-organization  
deserves moral status.  
The question “Does Earth have a pulse?” becomes inseparable from the question “Does Earth deserve care?”  
If we listen properly, the answer is obvious.  
Toward a Planetary Stethoscope: The Future of Earth Pulse Science  
Researchers across disciplines — climatology, geophysics, complexity science, ecology — are beginning to  
integrate data on Earth’s rhythms. Projects like the FuturEarth initiative, the Earth BioGenome Project, and  
ESA’s EarthCARE satellite are working toward a unified framework.  
Imagine an instrument that records:  
ocean heat pulses  
atmospheric pressure rhythms  
carbon “breath cycles”  
magnetic surges  
ecological metabolism in forests  
seismic vibrations of the crust  
A planetary stethoscope.  
One day, we may be able to say with scientific confidence that Earth’s heartbeat is measurable.  
The real question is whether we will listen in time.  
The Earth as an Emergent Organism: Lessons From Complexity Science  
If we attempt to understand the Earth through the lens of complexity science, the idea of a planetary heartbeat  
becomes not only plausible but expected. Complex systems — whether ant colonies, neural networks,  
societies, or ecosystems — generate emergent properties not predictable from their individual parts. A heart is  
an emergent property of coordinated tissues; consciousness is an emergent property of neural networks.  
Likewise, Earth’s regulatory rhythms may be an emergent property of interacting climate, oceanic, biological,  
and geological subsystems.  
Complexity theorist Melanie Mitchell (2009) argues that emergence is a hallmark of systems that achieve  
internal stability despite external fluctuations. Earth’s ability to maintain its temperature within a narrow range  
for 3.8 billion years, despite a 25–30% increase in solar luminosity (the “faint young Sun” problem), is itself a  
sign of deep systemic intelligence. Some scientists interpret this stability as accidental; others, more boldly, see  
coordination.  
A heartbeat does not belong to any single cell. It emerges from synchronized activation patterns — the  
sinoatrial node sending signals that ripple across tissue. Similarly, Earth’s climatic and ecological rhythms may  
arise not from a single “node” but from distributed feedback loops: oceans storing heat, forests regulating  
carbon, microbes influencing cloud condensation nuclei, ice sheets modulating albedo, volcanic activity  
altering atmospheric chemistry.  
When these loops align, they create repeating patterns.  
When they misalign, they create crises.  
In this sense, the heartbeat of a planet is not an organ but a pattern of coherence.  
Page 473  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
This reflection demands humility: living systems can be far larger and more abstract than biology traditionally  
allows. If consciousness can emerge from neurons, why cannot rhythm emerge from oceans?  
If life arises from cells, why cannot planetary vitality arise from ecosystems?  
The Planet’s Electrical and Magnetic Pulses: Signals Of A Living Field  
Beyond climate cycles and ocean rhythms, Earth also emits electromagnetic pulses that resemble signals  
within the nervous systems of large organisms. The Schumann Resonances — the Earth’s natural  
electromagnetic frequencies — oscillate mainly at 7.83 Hz and several harmonics (Sentman, 1995). These  
frequencies overlap with human brainwave patterns, especially the alpha range associated with calm  
awareness.  
Some physicists argue that these resonances are simply atmospheric phenomena; others suggest they reflect  
deeper electrodynamic coherence. Regardless of interpretation, the fact remains that Earth emits stable,  
measurable, rhythmic electromagnetic waves.  
Geophysicists also study “geomagnetic jerks” — sudden accelerations in magnetic field drift — which occur in  
quasi-periodic patterns (Mandea, 2010). These events resemble bursts of electrical activity analogous to neural  
firing. While no one claims Earth has neurons, the analogy illuminates a key truth: Earth communicates  
internally in electrical signals, just as biological organisms do.  
The question is whether these patterns contribute to systemic regulation — a planetary analogue to neural  
pulses. There is growing research into the idea that magnetic variations influence atmospheric circulation,  
cloud formation, and even biospheric behavior. If so, these are not random pulses; they are functional.  
A planet with electromagnetic rhythm is not a passive stone.  
It is a resonating presence.  
Earth’s Water Cycle As Circulation: A Planetary Bloodstream  
If the ocean currents resemble circulatory flows, the hydrological cycle resembles circulation even more  
directly. Water evaporates, condenses, falls as rain or snow, permeates soil, flows through rivers, and returns to  
the sea. This circulation nourishes forests, transports nutrients, shapes landscapes, and enables every biological  
process.  
Without circulation, a body dies.  
Without the hydrological cycle, Earth dies.  
This is not metaphor; it is structural equivalence.  
Atmospheric rivers — massive flows of moisture across continents — behave like arteries carrying vapor.  
River deltas function as nutrient-rich capillary beds. Groundwater tables mirror intercellular fluids. Even the  
salt content of oceans is comparable to the salt concentration of blood plasma, an uncanny biochemical parallel  
noted by biologists like Elaine Morgan (1997), who argued that terrestrial life develops in ways that preserve  
its oceanic ancestry.  
The hydrological cycle, with its rhythms of monsoon, drought, flood, and evaporation, is one of the clearest  
indicators of a planetary pulse. When climate change disrupts this cycle — monsoons become erratic, glaciers  
melt prematurely, water tables collapse — these disruptions resemble circulatory disorders.  
Earth’s pulse lies partly in its water.  
Water memory, in this context, becomes planetary memory.  
Page 474  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
Forests As Lungs And The Earth’s Oxygen Rhythm  
The analogy of forests as lungs has been used poetically for centuries, but it is also scientifically accurate.  
Approximately half of the world’s oxygen production occurs in terrestrial forests and half in oceanic  
phytoplankton (Falkowski, 2011). Forests inhale carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen in daily and seasonal  
rhythms. These rhythms correspond with global CO₂ oscillations — part of the “planetary breath.”  
Moreover, recent research shows that forests communicate internally. Trees exchange chemical signals  
through the air and electrical signals through mycorrhizal fungal networks (Simard, 2018). When forests  
experience stress, they alter their signaling patterns — similar to how lungs under stress alter breathing  
patterns.  
If forests are lungs and oceans are circulatory engines, then Earth already possesses analogues of vital organs.  
Their rhythms — the expansion and contraction of vegetation cycles — mirror biological breath.  
The growing instability of these cycles due to deforestation and warming temperatures reveals the fragility of  
Earth’s respiratory rhythm. Climate change, in this sense, is not just environmental degradation; it is  
pulmonary distress.  
The Pulse Of Geological Time: Tectonic Rhythms And Deep Breathing  
Earth’s crust, too, moves rhythmically. Tectonic plates collide and separate in cycles spanning tens to hundreds  
of millions of years. These “supercontinent cycles” have been identified through geological evidence showing  
the repeated assembly and breakup of landmasses — Rodinia, Pangaea, Gondwana, and others (Nance et al.,  
2014).  
These cycles redistribute heat, nutrients, and biodiversity. When continents merge, species converge; when  
continents separate, species diversify. This resembles the long breath of evolution — slow inhalation and  
exhalation.  
Volcanic eruptions, likewise, come in rhythmic cycles. They influence atmospheric chemistry, temperature  
patterns, and mass extinction events. These cycles are not cardiac in timescale, but they are rhythmic and  
essential.  
In deep time, the Earth breathes slowly.  
This breath is too vast for human lifetimes to perceive, but not too vast for geological science to record.  
The geological pulse is the slowest — but perhaps the most fundamental — of the planet’s rhythms.  
Emotional Earth: Can A Planet Feel?  
The notion of planetary emotion sounds unscientific at first. But emotions in biological creatures arise from  
feedback systems interpreting internal imbalance. When the body is stressed, we call the experience fear; when  
it thrives, we call it ease.  
If Earth’s systems can sense imbalance — rising heat, decreasing biodiversity, shifting currents, intensifying  
storms — and if these imbalances trigger responses (increased cloud cover, changes in albedo, altered ocean  
circulation), then Earth is responding affectively, if not consciously.  
Emotion does not require consciousness.  
It requires feedback.  
Some environmental philosophers argue that Earth’s storms, droughts, and chaotic weather can be understood  
as expressions of systemic stress — emotional turbulence in planetary physiology (Abram, 2010). Though  
Page 475  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
metaphorical, this framing alters how we interpret climate change. Instead of abstract data, we perceive  
distress signals.  
If the Earth’s rhythms communicate imbalance, listening becomes an ethical act.  
A doctor does not ignore a patient’s arrhythmia.  
Humanity cannot ignore the planet’s.  
The Pulse And Human Responsibility: Toward A New Planetary Ethics  
If Earth has a pulse, then humanity is not an external observer but a participant in a living system. Our actions  
directly influence the rhythm: deforestation, emissions, mining, overfishing, and urban expansion push the  
planetary pulse toward instability.  
The recognition of Earth’s vitality requires a new ethical framework.  
Philosopher Bruno Latour (2018) argues that humanity must “come back to Earth” — to recognize itself as  
part of a living system rather than master of a dead one. Indigenous traditions have long held this view; science  
is only now catching up. The idea of a planetary heartbeat serves as a bridge between ecological science and  
ecological ethics.  
If Earth is alive, then its suffering is not metaphorical.  
If Earth has a pulse, then that pulse can stop.  
In this light, caring for Earth becomes not environmentalism but kinship.  
This changes everything.  
Listening As A Scientific And Spiritual Practice  
What does it mean to listen for Earth’s heartbeat?  
It means developing instruments, models, and data systems — but also cultivating inner receptivity. Scientists  
listen through satellites; indigenous cultures listen through ceremony; poets listen through intuition. When  
these forms of listening converge, we gain a fuller picture of the planet.  
The future of Earth science may involve not only remote sensing but deep sensing — interdisciplinary  
approaches that integrate ecology, psychology, philosophy, and spiritual traditions.  
A planetary heartbeat is not a single signal but a symphony.  
To hear it, we must listen with all instruments — technological and human.  
CONCLUSION: Listening for Life in a Living World  
To ask whether the Earth has a heartbeat is to confront the possibility that life is more expansive, mysterious,  
and interconnected than we have dared to believe. The scientific rhythms we observe — oceanic, atmospheric,  
climatic, electromagnetic — are not simply mechanical cycles but signs of dynamic equilibrium.  
The philosophical traditions that declare Earth alive are not primitive but prophetic.  
As climate change accelerates, the rhythms of Earth grow more erratic. Listening for the planet’s pulse  
becomes more than scientific curiosity — it becomes an ethical imperative. If we can hear the heartbeat of the  
world, we will treat it not as a warehouse of resources but as a companion in the story of life.  
Page 476  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)  
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025  
A heartbeat is a reminder of fragility and strength.  
Earth’s rhythms remind us of both.  
And as long as they continue — however faintly — there is hope.  
REFERENCES  
1. Kauffman, Stuart. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization. Oxford  
University Press, 1995.  
2. Keeling, Charles David. “Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Variations.” Proceedings of the National  
Academy of Sciences, 1996.  
3. Lenton, Timothy. “Earth System Science and Gaia Theory.” Nature, 2016.  
4. Lovelock, James. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, 1979.  
5. Margulis, Lynn. “Symbiosis and Gaia.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1993.  
6. Rockström, Johan et al. “Planetary Boundaries.” Science, 2009.  
Page 477  
www.rsisinternational.org