A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A New Insight into The  
Variations of Origin Site of The Superior Thyroid Artery  
Mahmoud Sheikh-Mohammed Satte*  
Anatomy Department, Medical College, Najran University, Najran City, KSA  
*Corresponding Author  
Received: 18 November 2025; Accepted: 27 November 2025; Published: 05 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
Objectives: The purpose of this review was to perform a search that noted where the superior thyroid artery  
(STA) originated.  
Methods: The indexing databases PubMed and Google Scholar were used for the literature search and the  
articles that evaluated the origin site of the STA were included.  
Results: Seventy-one studies were analyzed, yielding a total of 6837 samples. Our findings revealed that STA  
commonly originated from the external carotid artery (58.17%), followed by carotid bifurcation (23.50%),  
common carotid (15.83%), and internal carotid (0.04%), lingual (0.01%), occipital (0.01%) and ascending  
pharyngeal (0.01%) arteries. It arises as a shared trunk (arising from external, internal or common carotid or  
carotid bifurcation arteries) with other arteries including thyro-lingual (1.45%), thyro-linguo-facial (0.54%),  
thyro-occipital(0.01%), thyro-linguo-laryngeal (0.01%), and thyro-hyo-laryngo-cricothyro-sternocleidomastoid  
(0.01%) trunks or absent (0.38%).  
Conclusion: We created a novel, simple classification based on our outcome. Attention to this anatomical  
variation is critical for surgeons and radiologists to achieve preferable anterior neck operations.  
Keywords: Variations, origin site, superior thyroid artery  
INTRODUCTION  
The location of the thyroid gland is in the upper anterior cervical region and wraps at the area of the cricoid  
cartilage and tracheal rings, posterior to the sternothyroid and sternohyoid muscles. On the anatomical and  
physiological side, the thyroid gland possesses right and left lobes, which are joined by the isthmus and are  
responsible for producing hormones in its surrounding capillaries, which are important for body growth and  
metabolic rate [1, 2]. The arterial supply to the head and cervical regions is provided by the common carotid  
artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), and external carotid artery (ECA). The right CCA comes from the  
brachiocephalic artery behind to the right sternoclavicular joint. The left CCA originates from the aortic arch in  
the superior mediastinum. Both CCAs ascend cranially through the neck below the front edge of the  
sternocleidomastoid muscle, from the sternoclavicular joint to the upper border of the thyroid cartilage. Here, it  
splits off into the ECA and ICA; this bifurcation region is called the carotid bifurcation (CB). One of the thyroid  
gland's primary arteries is the STA, which originates from the same side of the ECA and runs downward and is  
divided into numerous glandular branches: anterior, which descends on the posterior border to supply the medial  
and lateral surfaces and anastomoses with the inferior thyroid artery; posterior, which runs along the medial side  
of the upper part of the lateral lobe to supply primarily the anterior surface; and a branch that crosses above the  
isthmus to anastomose with its fellow on the opposite side. The lateral surface was occasionally supplied by a  
lateral branch. The infrahoid, superior laryngeal, sternocleidomastoid, and cricothyroid are non-glandular  
branches of the STA. The superior laryngeal nerve's external branch is frequently runs parallel to the STA. Since  
Page 550  
this nerve supplies the cricothyroid muscle, care should be taken to maintain it after surgery to avoid iatrogenic  
damage that could impair vocal cord function [2].  
The aberrant origin of STA is very prevalent and has been repeatedly reported. Human cadavers, arterial  
angiography, and accidental detection during neck surgery are the sources of detected variations [4, 5, 6]. In an  
important number of studies, the STA originates from the CCA, CB, and ICA, or is absent [7, 8].  
Most studies conducted on variances in the origin of the STA are simple case reports and original articles; hence,  
the information is scattered. The overall purpose of this review is to collect data and provide a valuable, solid,  
and critical summary about the variations in the STA concerning its origin, and to form an idea review without  
having to read all published works in the field such that this review data can be applied by surgeons in general,  
and a radiologist to decrease accidental complications that may lead to death in patients who undergo  
thyroidectomy or other anterior neck procedures.  
MATERIALS AND METHODS  
The study was conducted in the Anatomy Department, Medical College, Najran University, KSA, between  
September 2023 and March 2024. Systematic and meta-analysis reviews were managed in accordance with the  
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [9] using indexed databases,  
including PubMed and Google Scholar. The English terms used in the search strategy were ' variation in the  
origin of the superior thyroid artery “AND (aberrant) OR 'abnormal pattern of the superior thyroid artery” AND  
(unusual).  
Relevant articles describing the aberrant in the origin of the STA in cadaveric, angiographic, and surgical  
specimens were included in our systematic review. Duplicated studies, animal studies, incomplete information  
articles about our research question, and studies that carry other factors (pathological disease or high of bias)  
about abnormal in the origin of the STA were our systematic review exclusion criteria. No research limitations  
regarding the year of publication, age, ethnicity, and nation for the study population were set. The first study  
was conducted in December 1974, while the last study was conducted in October 2023.  
Before any analysis, an Excel sheet was used to extract data from eligible articles. The study basic features that  
were collected including the first author, year of publication, country or region of research, population, age,  
gender, investigative technique, type of specimens, number of specimens, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria,  
firsthand study, and end result.  
The eligible studies were evaluated using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) method [10], which  
consists of 25 items that were stated as marking questions and arranged into five domains: 1. purpose and subject  
characteristics, and 2. study design, 3. characterization of the methods and 4. descriptive anatomy, and 5. result  
reporting. Each cross-question for each item in each domain could be replied as ''Yes,” or ''No. If all or more  
than half of the items questions in each of domain answered ''Yes'' that means the domains have a low risk of  
bias, if all or more than half of the answer is ''No'' the domain judged have a high risk of bias. Regarding the  
number of the domains that have a risk of bias: if there is 1 of the total five domains that have a high risk of bias,  
the study is considered to have a low risk of bias, and if there are 2 to 3 domains that have a high risk of bias,  
then it is felt that the study has moderate risk of bias, and if there is 4 to 5 domains has high risk of bias, so study  
is considered to have a high risk of bias.  
RESULTS  
In the first literature search, a total of 38969 records were identified, and 12 records were discovered via the  
reference citation of the recognized sources (Figure 1). A total of 38928 records were identified after the removal  
of duplicates. A total of 38928 records were screened and 38742 records were rejected based on the exclusion  
criteria. A total of 186 reports were assessed for eligibility, of which 74 were excluded because they did not  
match the research question, 28 because of incomplete information about where STA take origin, 9 because they  
were animal studies, and 4 because they had a significant bias risk. A total of 71 articles were included in this  
systematic review [11-81].  
Page 551  
Figure 1: PRISMA follow diagram of our systematic review  
A total of seventy-one included studies had data collected from cadaveric dissection and surgical and  
angiographic imaging applied to patients. 15 studies among 71 were reported number of neck-halves instead of  
cadaver or patient, in this study we recorded number neck-halves instead of patients or cadavers, resulting in a  
total of 6837 neck-half investigations. The current study included the most races and ethnic groups around the  
world. The anthropological features of the included articles are listed in Table 1. 6837 samples tested to find out  
how the STA origins. The STA originated as separate trunk from ECA in 58.17%, CB in 23.50% and CCA in  
15.83%. In very uncommon cases, it arises as a single branch from the ICA (0.04%), lingual artery (0.01%),  
occipital artery (0.01%), or ascending pharyngeal artery (0.01). The STA originates as a common stem (arose  
from the ECA, or CB, or CCA or ICA) with the lingual artery (thyro-lingual trunk) in 1.45% of cases, with the  
lingual and facial arteries (thyro-linguo-facial trunk) in 0.54% of cases, with the occipital artery (thyro-occipital  
trunk) in 0.01% of cases, with the lingual and superior laryngeal arteries (thyro-linguo-laryngeal trunk) in 0.01%  
and with the infrahyoid, superior laryngeal, cricothyroid, and sternocleidomastoid arteries (thyro-hyo-laryngo-  
cricothyro-sternocleidomastoid trunk) in 0.01% of cases. STA was absent in 0.38% of cases. The results of this  
systematic review are presented in Table 2 and Figure 2. In Figure 2, the author presents a new simple  
categorization with thirteen types. The quality of our eligible studies was detected using AQUA tools, and four  
articles were excluded because they presented a high risk of bias (4-5 domain with high risk) in most of the five  
domains, whereas the included articles presented low (0-1 domain with high risk) to moderates (2-3 domains  
with high risk) risk of bias. The table 3 presented the included studies were assessed by AQUA tools.  
Page 552  
Figure 2: Schematic description shows the new categorization where the superior thyroid artery originated with  
thirteen types (1-13) and their rate of occurrence. 1, common carotid artery; 2, common carotid bifurcation; 3,  
external carotid artery; 4, internal carotid artery; 5, superior thyroid artery; 6, lingual artery; 7, occipital artery;  
8, ascending pharyngeal artery; 9, thyro-lingual trunk; 10, thyro-linguo-facial trunk; 11, facial artery; 12, thyro-  
occipital trunk; 13, thyro-hyo-laryngo-cricothyro-sternocleidomastoid trunk; 14, infrahyoid artery; 15, superior  
laryngeal artery; 16, cricothyroid artery; 17, sternocleidomastoid artery; 18, thyro-linguo-laryngeal trunk; 19,  
superior laryngeal artery.  
Table 1. Anthropologic aspects of included studies  
Author  
Year  
Country/  
Type of investigation Type of specimen Sex  
population  
(patient/ cadaver)  
(male/female)  
Fujimoto et 1974  
al.  
Smith and 1978  
Benton  
Espalieu et 1986  
al.  
Banna and 1990  
Lasjaunias  
Itezerote et 1990  
al.  
Kitagawa et 1993  
al.  
Moriggl and 1996  
Sturm  
Shintani et 1999  
al.  
Gluncic et 2001  
al.  
Hayashi et 2005  
al.  
Zumre et al. 2005  
Japan /adult  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/1  
1/0  
1/0  
UD  
1/0  
UR  
UD  
0/1  
UR  
1/0  
UD  
9/11  
UD  
USA/adult  
0/1nh  
France/adults Cadaveric dissection & 50ns/36nh  
angiographic  
KSA/adult  
Angiographic  
1/0  
Brazil/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/110nh  
74nh  
1
Japan/ fetuses UD  
Austria/adult Cadaveric dissection  
Japan /adults Cadaveric dissection  
Croatia/ adult Cadaveric dissection  
0/29  
0/1  
Japan/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/98nh  
0/20  
0/65nh  
Turkey/fetus Cadaveric dissection  
es  
New  
Lo et al.  
2006  
Cadaveric dissection  
Zealand/adult  
s
Aggarwal et 2006  
al.  
Terayama et 2006  
al.  
Ozgur et al. 2009  
India/adult  
Cadaveric dissection  
Angiographic  
1/0  
1/0  
Japan/UD  
96nh/0  
0/20  
0/57  
UD  
Turkey/adult Cadaveric dissection  
s
Bangladesh/  
UR  
17/3  
34/23  
Rimi et al.  
2009  
Cadaveric dissection  
Mehta et al. 2010  
Mamatha et 2010  
al.  
India/adult  
India/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/1  
0/1  
1/0  
1/0  
Sanjeev et 2010  
al.  
Al-Rafiah et 2011  
al.  
India/adults  
KSA/adults  
Greece/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/37nh  
0/30  
25/12  
UD  
Natsis et al. 2011  
0/50  
44/6  
Page 553  
Ongeti and 2011  
Ogeng'o  
Kenya/adults Cadaveric dissection  
0/46  
36/10  
Iwai et al.  
Magoma et 2012  
al.  
2012  
Japan/adult  
Kenya/UD  
Angiographic  
Cadaveric dissection  
1/0  
0/50  
1/0  
UD  
Cappabianc 2012  
a et al.  
Italy/adults  
Turkey/UD  
Angiographic  
Angiographic  
97/0  
68/29  
Acar et al.  
Gavrilidou  
et al.  
2013  
2013  
200nh/0  
& 88nh/0  
UD  
UD  
Romania/UD Surgery  
Angiographic  
Cadaveric dissection  
Patel et al.  
2013  
India/adults  
0/50  
UD  
Ozguner and 2014  
Sulak  
Turkey/fetus Cadaveric dissection  
es  
0/200  
100/100  
Anagnostop 2014  
oulou and  
Greece/adults Cadaveric dissection  
0/68  
UD  
Mavridis  
Gupta et al. 2014  
India/adults  
India/adults  
India/adult  
Angiographic  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
15/0  
0/33  
0/1  
13/2  
UD  
1/0  
Joshi et al.  
2014  
2015  
Motwani  
and Jhajhria  
Pushpalatha 2015  
and Vidhya  
India/UD  
India/UD  
India/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/50nh  
0/15  
UD  
UD  
UD  
Manjunath  
and  
2016  
Lokanathan  
Shivaleela et 2016  
0/42  
al.  
Ovhal et al. 2016  
Shankar et 2017  
India/UD  
India/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/60  
0/80nh  
52/8  
UD  
al.  
Rajapriya et 2017  
al.  
India/adults  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/25  
18/7  
Table 1. Anthropologic aspects of included studies (continued 1)  
Author  
Year  
Country/  
Type of investigation  
Type  
of Sex  
population  
specimen  
(male/female  
(patient/cadaver )  
)
Laxmi et al.  
Sakkiiammal et al. 2017  
Sreedharan et al.  
Esen et al.  
Dessie  
2017  
India/UD  
India/UD  
India/adults  
Turkey/adults  
Ethiopia/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Angiographic  
0/30  
0/26  
0/60nh  
640/0  
0/43  
UD  
UD  
UD  
379/261  
37/6  
2018  
2018  
2018  
Cadaveric dissection  
Amarttayakong et 2018  
al.  
Thailand/adults Cadaveric dissection & 55/55  
angiographic  
72/38  
Alzahrani et al.  
Sharma et al.  
Dakare  
2018  
2018  
and 2018  
UK/adults  
India/UD  
India/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/22  
0/30  
0/20  
9/13  
UD  
UD  
Bhuiyan  
Sharma  
2019  
India/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/50  
UD  
Page 554  
Ghosh et al  
2019  
and 2019  
2019  
St Kitts & Cadaveric dissection  
Nevis/adults  
0/49  
0/16  
22/27  
13/3  
UD  
Arjun  
Shishirkumar  
Bordei et al.  
India/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Romania/adult Cadaveric dissection & 83/61  
s & fetuses  
angiographic  
Tsegay et al  
Herrera-Nunez et 2020  
al.  
2019  
Ethiopia/UD  
Mexico/adults Angiographic  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/16  
76/0  
UD  
50/26  
Elsllabi et al  
Sharma et al.  
Pandit et al.  
Fakoya  
2020  
2021  
2021  
2021  
UK/UD  
Nepal/UD  
Nepal/UD  
St Kitts & Cadaveric dissection  
Nevis/adult  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/15  
0/30  
0/40  
0/1  
7/8  
UD  
UD  
0/1  
Shyamala  
Akhilandeswari  
Al-Azzawi  
and 2021  
India/adults  
Cadaveric dissection  
0/60  
0/20  
41/19  
10/10  
and 2021  
UK/UD  
Cadaveric dissection  
Takahashi  
Sudhakaran et al. 2021  
India/adults  
Bengal/adults  
India/adults  
Romania/UD  
Turkey/adults  
India/UD  
India/adults  
Mali/adult  
India/adults  
Cadaveric dissection  
Cadaveric dissection  
Angiographic  
Angiographic  
Angiographic  
Cadaveric dissection  
Angiographic  
Cadaveric dissection  
Angiographic  
0/22  
0/60  
44/0  
36/0  
288/0  
0/40  
210nh/0  
0/1  
100/0  
0/25nh  
0/1  
UR  
Saha and Nandy  
Sinha et al.  
Bunea et al.  
Demirtas et al.  
Anand et al.  
Bhardwaj et al.  
Toure et al.  
2022  
2022  
2022  
2022  
2022  
2023  
2023  
2023  
38/22  
31/13  
16/20  
169/119  
27/13  
UD  
1/0  
68/32  
UD  
Sasikumar et al.  
Gwunireama et al. 2023  
Bozhikova et al. 2023  
Nigeria/adults Cadaveric dissection  
USA/adult Cadaveric dissection  
1/0  
UD= undefined; nh= revealed number of neck halves instead patients and cadaver  
Table 2. Incidence of variant origin of superior thyroid artery  
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Study NH  
(C (CC (IC (LA (OA (AP (TL (T (TO (T (TIS (Ab  
(ECA B  
A%) A% %) %)  
)
A% T% LF T%) LL CST) %)  
%)  
%)  
)
)
T
T)  
%)  
Fujim  
oto et  
al.  
Smith  
and  
2
1
0 (0)  
1
1
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
(50 (50)  
)
0
0 (0)  
1
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
(0) (100)  
Bento  
n
Espali 86 39  
47 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
eu et  
al.  
(45)  
(55  
)
(0)  
Banna 2  
and  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
2
(100)  
Lasja  
unias  
Page 555  
Itezer 110 74  
ote et  
al.  
17 18  
(67.3) (15 (16.4  
.4)  
18 14  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1(0.  
9)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
1
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
)
Kitag 74 40  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2(2.  
7)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
awa et  
al.  
(54.1) (24 (18.9  
.3)  
)
Morig 2  
gl and  
Sturm  
0 (0)  
0
1
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
1
(0) (50)  
(50)  
Shinta 58 56  
0
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2  
0
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 1 (1)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
ni et  
al.  
(96.5 (0)  
5)  
(3.4 (0)  
5)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
Glunc 1  
ic et  
al.  
0 (0)  
1
0
(0)  
(10  
0)  
0
Hayas 98 68  
29  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
hi et  
al.  
(69.4) (0) (29.6  
)
Zumr 40 10  
28 2 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(70  
)
0
(0)  
e et al.  
(25)  
(0)  
Lo et 65 30  
34  
1
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
al.  
(46.2) (52 (1.5)  
)
Aggar 1  
wal et  
al.  
0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
0
(0)  
(0) (100) (0)  
Teray 96 44  
42  
9
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
ama  
et al.  
(45.8) (43 (9.4)  
.8)  
Ozgur 40 10  
16 14  
(40 (35)  
)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
et al.  
(25)  
Rimi 114 90  
15 9 (8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
0
et al.  
(79)  
(13  
)
(0)  
(0)  
Mehta 2  
et al.  
Mama 1  
tha et  
al.  
Sanje 37 23  
ev et  
al.  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
1
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
1
(50)  
(0) (50)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
(100 (0)  
)
0
13  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1  
0
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
(62.1 (0) (35.1  
6)  
2
(3.3)  
(2.7 (0)  
)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1  
4)  
Al-  
60  
46 11  
(76 (18.3  
.7)  
0
(0)  
Rafia  
(1.  
7)  
h
et  
)
al.  
Natsis 100 38  
48 11  
(48 (11)  
)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (3) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
et al.  
(38)  
Page 556  
Onget 92 74  
2
10  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6  
(6.  
5)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
i and  
Ogen  
g'o  
(80.4) (2. (10.9  
2)  
)
Iwai  
et al.  
1
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1  
(10  
0)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
Mago 82 61  
ma et  
al.  
0
21  
0
(0)  
(74.4) (0) (25.6  
)
65 17  
(44.8) (39 (10.3  
.4)  
(0)  
Cappa 165 74  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6  
3
0
(0)  
bianc  
a et al.  
Acar  
(3.6 (1.  
8)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (2) 0  
(0)  
)
)
200 98  
(49)  
62 36  
(31 (18)  
)
0
(0)  
et at.  
Gavril 64 34  
idou  
et al.  
12 18  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
(53.1 (18 (28.1  
25)  
.75 25)  
)
Patel 100 73  
23 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3  
1
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
et al.  
(73)  
(23  
)
(3% (1)  
)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (1) 0  
(0)  
Ozgu 400 385  
0
11  
0
(0)  
ner  
(96.2 (0) (2.75  
and  
5)  
)
Sulak  
Anag 136 22  
34 54  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10  
16 0 (0)  
)
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
nosto  
(16.2) (25 (39.7  
(7.4 (12  
)
poulo  
)
)
u and  
Mavri  
dis  
Gupta 25 18  
5
(20  
)
1 (4) 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
et al.  
(72)  
Joshi 66 44  
21  
1
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
et al.  
(66.6 (31 (1.51  
7)  
.81  
)
)
Motw  
ani  
and  
Jhajhr  
ia  
Pushp 50 34  
alatha  
and  
Vidhy  
a
1
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
1
0 (0)  
(0) (100)  
4
12  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
(68)  
(8) (24)  
Manj 30 18  
unath  
and  
7
5
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0
(0)  
(60)  
(23 (16.6  
.34 6)  
)
Page 557  
Lokan  
athan  
Shival 84 64  
18  
2
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
eela et  
al.  
(76.1 (21 (2.38  
9)  
.43  
)
)
Ovhal 120 107  
et al.  
0
7
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5  
(4.2 (0.  
8)  
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0  
(0)  
1
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
(89.1 (0) (5.83  
7)  
)
)
Shank 80 43  
12 25  
0
(0)  
ar et  
al.  
Rajap 50 24  
(53.7 (15 (31.2  
5) 5)  
22 2 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2) 1  
)
0
riya et  
al.  
(48)  
(44  
)
(2)  
(0)  
Table 2. Incidence of variant origin of superior thyroid artery (continued 1)  
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Stu N  
dy  
(ECA (CB (CC (IC (L (O  
%) %) A%) A% A A% %)  
%) )  
(APA (TLT (TL (TO (TLL (TI (Ab  
H
%)  
FT T%) T%) SC %)  
)
%)  
ST)  
La 60 29  
21  
9
0
0
0
0 (0)  
1
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
xm  
i et  
al.  
(48.33 (35) (15) (0)  
)
(0) (0)  
(1.67) (0)  
Sa 52 35  
14  
3
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
0
kki  
ia  
(67.3) (26. (5.8) (0)  
9)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
m
ma  
l et  
al.  
Sre 60 53  
5
2
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
edh  
ara  
n et  
al.  
(88.33 (8.3 (3.33 (0)  
3)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
)
)
Ese 12 667  
n et 80 (52.1) (21. (24.7 (0)  
al.  
279 316  
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
18  
(1.4  
)
0
(0)  
(0) (0)  
8)  
)
De 86 38  
24  
23  
0
1
0
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
ssi  
e
(44.2) (27. (26.7 (0)  
(1. (0)  
2)  
0
9)  
)
A
22 56  
62  
99  
0
0
0 (0)  
3
0
0
0
ma  
rtta  
yak  
on  
g et  
al.  
0
(25.5) (28. (45) (0)  
2)  
(0) (0)  
(1.4) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
Page 558  
Alz 44 31  
0
(0)  
12  
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
1
(2)  
ahr  
(71)  
(27) (0)  
(0) (0)  
ani  
et  
al.  
Sh 60 60  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
ar  
(100)  
(0) (0)  
ma  
et  
al.  
Da 39  
kar  
e
7
30  
1
0
0
0
0 (0)  
1
0
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
(17.94 (76. (2.5) (0)  
)
(0) (0)  
(2.5) (0)  
92)  
and  
Bh  
uiy  
an  
Sh 10 66  
33  
(33)  
1 (1)  
10  
(10.2 (1)  
)
0
(0)  
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
ar  
0
(66)  
(0) (0)  
ma  
Gh 98 82  
0
1
0
0
0 (0)  
0 (0)  
5
0
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
osh  
(83.7) (0)  
(0) (0)  
(5.1) (0)  
et  
al  
Arj 32 19  
12  
0 (0)  
0
0
0
1
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
un  
(59.3) (37.  
5)  
(0)  
(0) (0)  
(3.13) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
and  
Shi  
shi  
rku  
ma  
r
Bo 14 89  
21  
31  
0
0
0
0 (0)  
2
1
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
rde  
i et  
al.  
4
(61.80 (14. (21.5 (0)  
58) 3)  
(0) (0)  
(1.39) (0.6  
9)  
)
Tse 32 27  
3
2
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
gay  
et  
(84.37 (9.3 (6.25 (0)  
5)  
(0) (0)  
75)  
)
al  
He 15 77  
31  
26  
0
0
0
0 (0) 16  
0
0
2
rrer 2  
a-  
(50.7) (20. (17.1 (0)  
(0) (0)  
(10.5) (0)  
(0)  
(1.3  
)
4)  
)
Nu  
nez  
et  
al.  
Els 30 18  
0
12  
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
lla  
bi  
et  
(60)  
(0)  
(40) (0)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
al  
Page 559  
Sh 30 27  
2
1
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
ar  
(90)  
(6.6 (3.33 (0)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
ma  
7)  
)
et  
al.  
Pa 80 22  
4
50  
0
0
0
0 (0) 4 (5)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
ndi  
t et  
al.  
(27.5) (5)  
(62.5 (0)  
)
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
Fa  
ko  
ya  
1
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
3 (5)  
1
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
(10 (0) (0)  
0)  
0
Sh 60 28  
28  
0
0
1
0
0
ya  
ma  
la  
(46.7) (46.  
7)  
(0)  
(0) (0)  
(1.7  
)
(0)  
(0)  
and  
Ak  
hil  
and  
es  
wa  
ri  
Al- 40 26  
10  
4
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
Az  
(65)  
(25) (10) (0)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
za  
wi  
and  
Ta  
kah  
ash  
i
Su 44 14  
26  
3 (7)  
0
0
1
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
dha  
kar  
an  
(31.8) (59)  
(0)  
(0) (2.3  
)
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
et  
al.  
Sa 12 93  
14  
9
0
0
0
0 (0)  
2
2
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
ha  
and  
Na  
nd  
y
0
(77.5) (11. (7.5) (0)  
67)  
(0) (0)  
(1.67) (1.6  
7)  
(0)  
(0)  
Sin 88 34  
48  
5
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
1
(1.1  
4)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
ha  
et  
(38.64 (54. (5.68 (0)  
)
(0) (0)  
54)  
6
)
al.  
Bu 72 62  
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
nea  
et  
(86.11 (8.3 (5.56 (0)  
3)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
)
)
al.  
Page 560  
De 56 273  
248 31  
0
0
0
0 (0) 11  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
mir 3  
tas  
et  
(48.49 (44. (5.51 (0)  
(0) (0)  
(1.95) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
)
05)  
32  
)
al.  
An 80 32  
and  
et  
al.  
16  
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
(40)  
(40) (20) (0)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
Bh 21 162  
30  
18  
0
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
0
0
ard  
waj  
et  
0
(77.1) (14. (8.6) (0)  
3)  
(0) (0)  
(0)  
(0)  
(0)  
al.  
To  
ure  
et  
1
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
0
1
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
(0) (0)  
(100)  
al.  
Sas 20 144  
16  
30  
0
0
0
0 (0) 8 (4)  
2
0
0
iku  
ma  
r et  
al.  
0
(72)  
(8)  
(15) (0)  
(0) (0)  
(1)  
(0)  
(0)  
Gw 22  
uni  
9
8
4
0
0
0
0 (0)  
1
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
(0)  
(40.91 (36. (18.1 (0)  
(0) (0)  
(4.54) (0)  
rea  
)
36) 8)  
ma  
et  
al.  
Bo  
zhi  
ko  
va  
et  
1
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0
0
0 (0) 0 (0)  
0
(0)  
0 (0)  
1
0
0
(0)  
(0) (0)  
(100) (0)  
al.  
To 68 3977  
tal 37 (58.17  
%)  
160 1082  
3
1
1
1
99  
37  
1
1
1
26  
7
(15.8 (0.0 (0. (0.0 (0.01) (1.45 (0.5 (0.01 (0.01 (0.0 (0.3  
(23. 3%) 4% 01 1%  
50  
%)  
4% %)  
)
%)  
1)  
8%  
)
)
%) )  
%)  
NH, neck halves; n, number of specimens; ECA, external carotid artery; CB, common carotid artery bifurcation;  
CCA, common carotid artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; LA, lingual artery; OA, occipital artery; APA,  
ascending pharyngeal artery; TLT, thyro-lingual trunk; TLFT, thyro-linguo-facial trunk; TOT, thyro-occipital  
trunk; TLLT, thyro-linguo-laryngeal trunk; TISCST, thyro-hyo-laryngo-crico-mastoid trunk; Ab, absent.  
Table 3. The eligible studies were evaluated using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) method  
Domai Domain 2 Domain 3  
Study n 1  
Domain 4  
Domain 5  
Risk of  
bias  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1  
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1 1 1 2 2 2  
7 8 9 0 1 2  
2
3
2 2  
4 5  
0
Page 561  
Fujim N Y Y Y Y N N Y Y N  
oto et  
al.  
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y N N Y N Y Y N Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Smith Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
and  
Bento  
n
Espali Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y  
eu et  
al.  
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Low  
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Low  
Bann Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
a and  
Lasja  
unias  
Itezer Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
ote et  
al.  
Kitag N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N  
awa et  
al.  
Morig N Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y  
gl and  
Sturm  
Shint Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y  
ani et  
al.  
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N Y  
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Low  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Moderat  
e
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Low  
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Low  
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Glunc N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
ic et  
al.  
Hayas Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
hi et  
al.  
Zumr Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
e et al.  
Lo et Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
al.  
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y Y  
N Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
N N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Low  
Aggar N Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y  
wal et  
al.  
Teray Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y  
N
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
ama  
et al.  
Ozgur Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
et al.  
Rimi Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
et al.  
Meht Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N  
a et al.  
Mam N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N  
atha  
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y Y  
N Y  
N Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Moderat  
e
et al.  
Page 562  
Sanje Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N  
ev et  
al.  
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Al-  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
Rafia  
h
et  
al.  
Natsis Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N  
et al.  
Onget Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
i and  
Ogen  
g'o  
Iwai  
et al.  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Mago Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
ma et  
al.  
Capp Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
Y
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
abian  
ca et  
al.  
Acar  
et at.  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Gavri N Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y  
lidou  
et al.  
Patel N Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y  
et al.  
Ozgu Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
ner  
and  
Sulak  
Anag Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N  
N
N
Y
Y Y  
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
nosto  
poulo  
u and  
Mavri  
dis  
Gupta Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
et al.  
Joshi Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
et al.  
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Low  
Motw Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
ani  
and  
Jhajhr  
ia  
Pushp Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
N
N
Y
N Y  
Y
Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
alatha  
and  
Vidhy  
a
Page 563  
Manj Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N  
N
N
Y
Y Y  
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
unath  
and  
Loka  
natha  
n
Shiva N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
N
N
Y
Y Y  
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
leela  
et al.  
Ovhal Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
et al.  
Shank Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y N  
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N Y  
Y Y  
Y
Y
Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
ar et  
al.  
Rajap Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y  
N
N
Y
Y Y  
Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
riya et  
al.  
Table 3. The eligible studies were evaluated using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) method  
(continued 1)  
Study  
Domai Domain  
n 1  
Domain 3  
Domain 4  
Domain 5  
Result  
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2  
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5  
Laxmi et al.  
Esakkiammal  
et al.  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Moderate  
Sreedharan et Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
al.  
Esen et al.  
Dessie  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Amarttayakon Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
g et al.  
Alzahrani et al. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Sharma et al.  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Dakare  
and N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Moderate  
Bhuiyan  
Sharma  
Ghosh et al  
Arjun  
N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Moderate  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
and Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Shishirkumar  
Bordei et al.  
Tsegay et al  
N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Moderate  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Herrera-Nunez Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
et al.  
Elsllabi et al  
Sharma et al.  
Pandit et al.  
Fakoya  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Moderate  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Page 564  
Shyamala and Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Akhilandeswar  
i
Al-Azzawi and Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Takahashi  
Sudhakaran et Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
al.  
Saha  
and Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Nandy  
Sinha et al.  
Bunea et al.  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Demirtas et al. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Anand et al. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Bhardwaj et al. Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Toure et al. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
Sasikumar et Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
al.  
Gwunireama et Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
al.  
Bozhikova et Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Low  
al.  
Note1. Domain 1: OBJECTIVE (S) AND SUBJECT CHARACTARISTICS. (1) Was (Were) the objective(s) of  
the study clearly defined? (2) Was (Were) the chosen subject sample(s)? (3) Are the baseline and demographic  
characteristics of the subjects (age, sex, ethnicity, health or disease, etc.) appropriate and clearly defined? (4)  
Could the method of subject selection have in any way introduced bias into the study? Domain 2: STUDY  
DESIGN. (5) Does the study design appropriately address the research question(s)? (6) Were the materials used  
in the study appropriate for given objective(s) of the study? (7) Were the methods used in the study appropriate  
for the given objective(s) of the study? (8) Was the study design including methods/techniques applied in the  
study, widely accepted or standard in the literature? If ''no'' are the novel features of the study design clearly  
described? (9) Could the study design have in any way introduced bias into the study? Domain 3:  
METHODOLOGY CHARACTERIZATION. (10) Are the methods/techniques applied in the study described  
in enough detail for them to be reproduced? (11) Was the specialty and the experience of the individual(s)  
performing each part of the study (such as cadaveric dissection or image assessment) clearly defined? (12) Are  
all the materials and methods used in the study clearly described, including details of manufacturers, suppliers  
etc.? (13) Were appropriate measures taken to reduce inter- and intra-observer variability? (14) Do the images  
presented in the study indicate an accurate reflection of the methods/techniques (imaging, cadaveric,  
intraoperative, etc.) applied in the study? (15) Could the characterization of methods have in any way introduced  
bias into the study? Domain 4: DISCRIPTIVE ANATOMY. (16) Were the anatomical definition(s) (normal  
anatomy, variations, classifications, etc.) clearly and accurately described? (17) Were the outcomes and  
parameters assessed in the study (variations, length, diameter, etc.) appropriate and clearly defined? (18) Were  
the figures (images, illustrations, diagrams, etc.) presented in the study clear and understandable? (19) Were any  
ambiguous anatomical observations (i.e., those likely to be classified as ''others'') clearly described/depicted?  
(20) Could the description of anatomy have any way introduced bias into the study? Domain 5: REPORTING  
OF RESULTS. (21) Was the statistical analysis appropriate? (22) Are the reported results as presented in the  
study clear and comprehensible, and are the reported values consistent throughout the manuscript? (23) Do the  
reported numbers or results always correspond to the numbers of subjects in the study? If not, do the authors  
clearly explain the reason(s) for subject exclusion? (24) Are all potential confounders reported in the study, and  
subsequently measured and evaluated, if appropriate? (25) Could the reporting of results have in any way  
introduced bias into the study?  
Note 2. Domains highlighted in red have high risk of bias.  
Page 565  
DISCUSSION  
This systematic review revealed the importance of variances when the STA first originated. In accordance with  
the information of all included studies, the most prevalent site of origin was the ECA, followed by the CB and  
CCA. Its origin is always associated with the embryonic principle (aortic or branchial arches) of the great vessels  
of the neck during the third week of gestation. The CCA and proximal part of the ICA are derived from the third  
aortic arch while the distal part of the ICA developed from the dorsal aorta and from the third aortic arch, the  
ECA sprout [85]. In this study, we proposed that the STA commonly grows from the third aortic arch and rarely  
from the dorsal aorta.  
Knowledge of STA anatomy is clinically crucial for surgeons and radiologists who operate on the head and neck  
regions to minimize the occurrence of complications. Maximum attention must be kept in mind during various  
operations on the anterior neck, such as thyroid and parathyroid surgeries, larynx and tracheal surgical entrances,  
carotid artery operations, and radiological investigations [82]. Throughout the thyroidectomy, the STA has to  
be ligated, in case it is carelessly severed, considering that it can cause hemorrhage that is difficult to manage  
[84]. Postoperative neck hematoma due to the STA injury has been reported after anterior cervical discectomy  
and fusion [89]. During larynx surgery, the STA must also be ligated, it is possible for the external laryngeal  
nerve branch to sustain damage, and if the superior laryngeal nerve is damaged accidentally during working on  
STA, hoarseness, difficult in swallowing or breathing or the loss of voice are the clinical symptoms expected to  
occur [84]. In extremely rare conditions, an STA pseudoaneurysm caused by tangential injury of this artery can  
appear during anterior neck surgeries, and its clinical implications include pulsating pain on the neck, difficulty  
in swallowing or breathing, and oral cavity hemorrhage [87, 88]. The STA plays an important and useful role in  
some surgical and therapeutic interventions, such as in cases of CCA occlusion used as collateral circulation  
between ECAs [90], angioembolization for treatment of neoplasms or large toxic goitre of the thyroid gland [91,  
92], and as a recipient vessel for reconstruction of chest and upper back defects, as well as in microvascular  
anastomosis [93].  
Regarding race and ethnicity, the STA where arose was detected in 3543 Caucasian and 931 East Asian  
specimens obtained from cadaveric dissection and angiographic images. The authors reported that site origin of  
STA from the ECA was more frequent among Caucasians, but East Asians were revealed to have a greater  
prevalence of STA arising from the CCA [86]. The results of our study are different; Caucasians showed that  
the most common site origin of STA is the CB, whereas East Asians presented a higher prevalence of the site  
origin of STA is the ECA [11-81]. The current study is accurate because it contains a larger number of specimens  
and proposes that there are meaningful changes through race and ethnicity.  
CONCLUSION  
STA is the main source of arterial supply to the thyroid gland, and this systematic review revealed variations in  
its origin, which was suggested in a new classification. Knowledge of the anatomical origin sites of the STA is  
important for surgeons and radiologists to achieve better outcomes during head and neck surgery.  
Author contributions  
The author design and implementation of the research, analysis of the result, and writing of the manuscript  
Conflict of interest declaration  
The author declares that there is no involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interests in this  
manuscript.  
REFERENCES:  
1. Khurana I, Khurana A. Concise textbook of physiology. 3th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2018: 314-320  
2. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 42 ed. London: Elsevier; 2021:  
583-85  
Page 566  
3. Lucev N, Bobinac D, Maric I, Drescik I. Variations of the great arteries in the carotid triangle.  
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 122(4): 590-1. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.97982.  
4. Cobiella R, Quinones S, Aragones P, Leon X, Abramovic A, Vazquez T, Ramon Sanudo J, Maranillo  
E, Olewnik L, Simon de Blas C, Parkin I, Konschake M. Anatomic mapping of the collateral branches  
of the external carotid artery with regard to daily clinical practice. Ann Anat. 2021; 238: 151789.  
10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151789.  
5. Jitpun E, Wattanasen Y, Tirakotai W. Do Asian have higher carotid bifurcation? A computed  
tomographic angiogram study of the common carotid artery bifurcation and external carotid artery  
branching patterns. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019; 14(4): 1082-1088. DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_162_19  
6. Du E, Pecoriello JM, Dos Reis LL, Spaulding SL, Sharif KF, Urken ML. Aberrant course of the  
dominant superior thyroid artery in a patient undergoing a total thyroidectomy. Otolaryngology Case  
Reports. 2019; 10: 5-7. DOI: 10.1016/J.xocr.2018.12.006  
7. Issing PR, Kempf HG, Lenarz T. A clinically relevant variation of the superior thyroid artery.  
Laryngorhinootoloqie. 1994; 73(10): 536-537. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-997189.  
8. Poyraz M, Calguner E. Bilateral investigation of the anatomical relationships of the external branch  
of the superior laryngeal nerve and superior thyroid artery. and also the recurrent laryngeal nerve and  
inferior thyroid artery. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2001; 78(2-3): 65-74. DOI: 10.2535/ofaj1936.78.2-  
3_65.  
9. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ,  
Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of  
studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Med. 2009;  
6(7):e1000100. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.  
10. Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Ramakrishnan PK, Roy J, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, Walocha JA.  
Development of the anatomical quality assessment (AQUA) tool for the quality assessment of  
anatomical studies included in meta-analyses and systematic review. Clin Anat. 2017; 30(1):6-13.  
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22799.  
11. Bhardwaj Y, Singh B, Bhadoria P, Malhotra R, Tarafdar S, Bisht K. Computed tomography  
angiographic study of surgical anatomy of thyroid arteries: clinical implications in neck dissection.  
World J Radiol. 2023; 15(6): 182-190. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.182  
12. Al-Rafiah A, El-Haggagy AA, Aal IH, Zaki AI. Anatomical study of the carotid bifurcation and origin  
variations of the ascending pharyngeal and superior thyroid arteries. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2011;  
70(1): 47-55. PMID: 21604253  
13. Manjunath CS, Lokanathan TH. Anatomical variations in the origin of superior thyroid artery and its  
clinical significance. Int J Anat Res. 2016; 4(3): 2656-8. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.295  
14. Lo A, Oehley M, Bartlett A, Adams D, Blyth P, Al-Ali S. Anatomical variations of the common  
carotid artery bifurcation. ANZ J Surg. 2006; 76(11): 970-972. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03913.x  
15. Mehta V, Suri RK, Arora J, Rath G, Das S. Anomalous superior thyroid artery. Kathmandu Univ Med  
J (KUMJ). 2010; 8(32): 429-431. DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v8i4.6246  
16. Kitagawa W. Arterial supply of the thyroid gland in the human fetuses. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi.  
1993; 60(3): 140-155. DOI: 10.1272/jnms1923.140  
17. Ozguner G, Sulak O. Arterial supply to the thyroid gland and the relationship between the recurrent  
laryngeal nerve and the inferior thyroid artery in human fetal cadavers. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(8): 1185-  
92. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22448  
18. Ozgur Z, Govsa F, Celik S, Ozgur T. Clinical relevant variations of the superior thyroid artery: an  
anatomic guide for surgical neck dissection. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(3): 151-159. DOI:  
10.1007/s00276-008-0405-7  
19. Anagnostopoulou S, Mavridis I. Emerging pattern of the human superior thyroid artery and review of  
its clinical anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(1): 33-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1149-6  
20. Sreedharan R, Krishna L, Shetty A. Origin of superior thyroid artery: under the surgeon's khife. J Vasc  
Bras. 2018; 17(4): 290-5. DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.004218  
21. Herrera-Nunez M, Menchaca-Gutierrez JL, Pinales-Razo R, Elizondo-Riojas G, Quirog-Garza A,  
Fernadez-Rodarte BA, Elizondo-Omana RE, Guzman-Lopez S. Origin variations of the superior  
thyroid, lingual, and facial arteries: A computed tomography angiography study. Surg Radiol Anat.  
2020; 42(9): DOI: 1085-93. 10.1007/s00276-020-02507-6  
Page 567  
22. Espalieu P, Cottier M, Relave M, Youvarlakis P, Cuillert J. Radio-anatomic study of the carotid axis  
with regard to the implantation of microsurgical vascular anastomoses. Surg Radiol Anat. 1986; 8(4):  
257-263. DOI: 10.1007/BF02425076  
23. Sharma N, Pandit R, Neupane B, Sah RP, Bhattarai L, Yadav PK. Right external carotid artery  
originated right superior thyroid artery in cadavers of a medical college in Nepal: Descriptive cross-  
sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021; 59(241): 906-9. DOI: 10.31729/jnma.6419  
24. Natsis K, Raikos A, Foundos I, Noussios G, Lazaridis N, Njau SN. Superior thyroid artery origin in  
Caucasian Greeks: a new classification proposal and review of the literature. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(6):  
699-705. DOI: 10.1002/ca.21181  
25. Banna M, Lasjaunias P. The arteries of the lingual thyroid: angiographic findings and anatomic  
variations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990; 11(4): 730-732. PMCID: PMC8331643  
26. Acar M, Salbacak A, Sakarya ME, Zarariz I, Ulusoy M. The morphometric analysis of the external  
carotid artery and its branches with multidetector computerized tomography angiography technique.  
International Journal of Morphology. 2013; 3(4): 1407-14. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-  
95022013000400042  
27. Iwai T, Izumi T, Inoue T, Maegawa J, Fuwa N, Mitsudo K, Tohnai I. Thyrolingual trunk arising from  
the common carotid artery identified by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. Surg  
Radiol Anat. 2012; 34(1): 85-8  
28. Motwani R, Jhajhria SK. Variant branching pattern of superior thyroid artery and its clinical  
relevance:  
A
case report.  
J
Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(5): AD05-AD06. DOI:  
10.7860/JCDR/2015/12956.6065  
29. Ongeti KW, Ogeng'o JA. Variant origin of the superior thyroid artery in a Kenyan population. Clin  
Anat. 2012; 25(2):198-202. DOI: 10.1002/ca.21207.  
30. Gupta P, Bhalla AS, Thulkar S, Kumar A, Mohanti BK, Thakar A, Sharma A. Variations in superior  
thyroid artery: A selective angiographic study. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014; 24(1): 66-71. DOI:  
10.4103/0971-3026.130701  
31. Esen K, Ozgur A, Balci Y, Tok S, Kara E. Variations in the origins of the thyroid arteries on CT  
angiography. Jpn J Radiol. 2018; 36(2): 96-102. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-017-0710-3  
32. Dessie MA. Variations of the origin of superior thyroid artery and its relationship with the external  
branch of superior laryngeal nerve. PLos One. 2018; 13(5): e0197075. DOI:  
10.1371/journal.pone.0197075.  
33. Joshi A, Gupta S, Vaniya VH. Anatomical variation in the origin of superior thyroid artery and its  
relation with external laryngeal nerve. National journal of medical research. 2014; 4(02): 138-141  
34. Hayashi N, Hori E, Ohtani O, Kuwayama N, Endo S. Surgical anatomy of the cervical carotid artery  
for carotid endarterectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2005; 45 (1): 25-29. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.45.25  
35. Fujimoto Y, Suwa F, Kimura K. A case of the left superior thyroid artery arising from the left common  
carotid artery and A. thyroidea ima. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1974; 51(5): 219-230. DOI:  
10.2535/ofaj1936.51.5_219  
36. Moriggl B, Sturm W. Absence of three regular thyroid arteries replaced by an unusual lowest thyroid  
artery (A. thyroidea ima): a case report. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996; 18(2): 147-150. DOI:  
10.1007/BF01795238  
37. Mamatha T, Rai R, Prabhu LV, Hadimani GA, Jiji PJ, Prameela MD. Anomalous branching pattern  
of the external carotid artery: a case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2010; 51(3): 593-5. PMID:  
20809046  
38. Gluncic V, Petanjek Z, Marusic A, Gluncic I. High bifurcation of common carotid artery, anomalous  
origin of ascending pharyngeal artery and anomalous branching pattern of external carotid artery. Surg  
Radiol Anat. 2001; 23(2): 123-5. 10.1007/s00276-001-0123-x  
39. Zumre O, Salbacak A, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I, Seker M. Investigation of the bifurcation level of  
the common carotid artery and variations of the branches of the external carotid artery in human  
fetuses. Ann Anat. 2005; 187(4): 361-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2005.03.007  
40. Aggarwal NR, Krishnamoorthy T, Devasia B, Menon G, Chandrasekhar K. Variant origin of superior  
thyroid artery, occipital artery and ascending pharyngeal artery from a common trunk from the  
cervical segment of internal carotid artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006; 28(6): 650-3. DOI:  
10.1007/s00276-006-0145-5  
Page 568  
41. Pandit R. Anatomical variations in the origin of superior thyroid artery and its relation with external  
laryngeal nerve and their clinical importance a cadaveric study. Journal of Universal College of  
Medicine Sciences. 2021. 9(1). DOI: 10.3126/jucms.v9i01.37964  
42. Fakoya AO, Subedi N, Martir JB, Carreras BC, Afolabi AG, McCracken T. Anomalous origin of the  
superior thyroid from the internal carotid artery. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical  
Sciences. 2021; 9(A): 95-7. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.4549  
43. Pushpalatha M, Vidhya KS. Study on variations in origin of superior thyroid artery. J Evid Based Med  
Healthc. 2015; 2(59): 8968-70. DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2015/1268  
44. Shivaleela C, Anupama D, Lakshmi Prabha Subhash R. Study of anatomical variations in the origin  
of superior thyroid artery. Int J Anat Res. 2016; 4(1): 1765-8. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2015.327  
45. Sharma A. Variation in the origin of superior thyroid artery and its relation with external laryngeal  
nerve. A cadaveric study. Acad Anat Int. 2019; 5(1): 6-9. DOI: 10.21276/aanat.2019.5.1.2  
46. Smith SD, Benton RS. A rare origin of the superior thyroid artery. Acta Anat (Basel). 1978; 101(1):  
91-3. DOI: 10.1159/000144952  
47. Sanjeev IK, Anita H, Ashwini M, Mahesh U, Rairam GB. Branching pattern of external carotid artery  
in human cadavers. J Clin Diagn Res. 2010; 4(5): 3128-3. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2010/.978  
48. Gavrilidou P, IIiescu DM, Baz R, Rusali LM, Bordei P. Anatomical peculiarities of the origin and  
traject of the superior thyroid artery. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2013; 19(3): 124-9. DOI: 10.2478/arsm-  
2013-0022  
49. Saha A, Nandy S. Cross sectional study on thyroid arteries with clinical correlations. Bengal Journal  
of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2022; 30(3): 305-12. DOI:  
10.47210/bjohns.2022.v30i3.875  
50. Shyamala BY, Akhilandeswari B. Cadaveric study on variations in the source and level of origin of  
superior thyroid artery. J Anat Soc India. 2021; 70(4): 251-4. DOI: 10.4103/JASI_231_19  
51. Magoma G, Saidi H, Kaisha WO. Origin of thyroid arteries in a Kenyan population. Annals of African  
Surgery. 2012; 9: 50-4.  
52. Amarttayakong P, Woraputtaporn W, Munkong W, Sangkhano S. Cadaveric and angiographic studies  
of superior thyroid artery: anatomical variations in origin and distance to carotid bifurcation. Asia  
Pacific Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 23(4): 1-7. DOI: 10.14456/apst.2018.14  
53. Alzahrani RE, Alashkham A, Soames R. Observations on the superior thyroid artery and its  
relationship with the external laryngeal nerve. Anat Physiol. 2018; 8(292): 1-5. DOI: 10.4172/2161-  
0940.1000292  
54. Ghosh A, Chaudhury S, Datta A. Variations, relations and clinical significance of carotid arterial  
system in anterior neck: a cadaveric study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019; 7(4): 1127-32. DOI:  
10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191311  
55. Patel JP, Dave RV, Shah RK, Kanani SD, Nirvan AB. A study of superior thyroid artery in 50  
cadavers. International Journal of Biological Medicine Research. 2013; 4: 2875-878.  
56. Sharma A, Kaur H, Chhabra U. Morphological variations in the arterial & nerve supply of thyroid  
gland-a cadaveric study. Int J Anat Res. 2018; 6(1.3): 5024-29. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2018.103  
57. Sinha MB, Gupta G, Kolhe N, Sinha H, Gautam N. Variation in common carotid artery, with special  
reference to superior thyroid artery: A retrospective angiographic study from central India. Al Am een  
J Med Sci. 2022; 15(2): 92-100.  
58. Rimi KR, Ara S, Hossain M, Shefyetullah KM, Naushaba H, Bose BK. Postmortem study of thyroid  
arteries in Bangladeshi people. Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy. 2009; 7(1): 26-33. DOI:  
10.3329/bja.v7i14  
59. Shankar VV, Komala N, Shetty S. A cross-sectional study of superior thyroid artery in human  
cadavers. Int J Anat Res. 2017; 5(4.3): 4751-55. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2017.463  
60. Rajapriya V, Ramya TP, Anjana TS. An anatomical study on the origin and length of the superior  
thyroid artery in adult human cadavers with its clinical significance. Internal Journal of Anatomy and  
Research. 2017; 5: 342-5. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.493  
61. Laxmi V, Kaur K, Chhabra P. Superior thyroid artery: its origin, length, relations and branches. Int  
Ann Med. 2017; 1(4). 10.24087/IAM.2017.1.4.110  
62. Bordei P, IIiescu DM, Rusali LM, Hainarosie R, Jecan RC, Popa CC, Ardeleanu V. Resin based  
materials used to observing the variations of the origin of the superior thyroid artery with importance  
Page 569  
in cervical and cranial pathology. MATERIALE PLASTICE. 2019; 56(1): 115-9. DOI:  
10.37358/MP.19.1.5134  
63. Tsegay AT, Berhe T, Amdeslase F, Hayelom H. Variations on arterial supply of thyroid gland and its  
clinical significance in selected universities of North Ethiopia. Int J Anat Res. 2019; 7(3.2): 6830-4.  
DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2019.237  
64. Terayama N, Sanada J, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Yamashiro M, Takanaka T, Kumano T, Yoshizaki T,  
Furukawa M. Feeding artery of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers: role of the superior thyroid  
artery in superselective intraarterial chemotherapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006; 29(4):536-43.  
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0094-0.  
65. Cappabianca S, Scuotto A, Iaselli F, Pignatelli di Spinazzola N, Urraro F, Sarti G, Montermarano M,  
Gassi R, Rotondo A. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation  
of aberrant origin of the external carotid artery branches. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012; 34(5):393-9. DOI:  
10.1007/s00276-011-0926-3.  
66. Arjun R, Shishirkumar. Origin of superior thyroid artery and superior laryngeal artery- A cadaveric  
study. MedPulse International Journal of Anatomy. 2019; 12(3): 87-90. DOI: 10.26611/10011237  
67. Al-Azzawi A, Takahashi T. Anatomical variations of thyroid gland: An experimental cadaveric study.  
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 70:102823. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102823  
68. Itezerote A, Rodrigues C, Prates JC. Superior thyroid artery: origin, collateral and glandular branches.  
Rev Chil Anat. 1999; 17(1):47-50. DOI: 10.4067/S0716-98681999000100007  
69. Sasikumar N, SV, Raghunath G, et al. Morphometric study and branching pattern of external carotid  
artery using computed tomography among the south Indian population: A retrospective study. Cureus.  
2023; 15(2):e35624. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35624  
70. Elsllabi M, Garoushi S, Aneiba OA. Variation in the branching pattern of the anterior branches of  
external carotid artery. Libyan J Med Sci. 2020; 4:184-7. DOI: 10.4103/LJMS.LJMS_53_20  
71. Esakkiammal N, Chauhan R, Sharma R. Clinical implications of the variable origin of external carotid  
branches and high level bifurcation of common carotid artery. Int J Anat Res. 2017; 5(2.3):3958-63.  
DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2017.228  
72. Dakare SH, Bhuiyan PS. A morphological study of branches of external carotid artery in adult human  
cadavers. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2018; 7(2): 162-5. DOI:  
10.1016/j.jasi.2018.11.011  
73. Demirtas I, Ayyildiz B, Demirbas AT, Ayyildiz S, Sonmez Topcu F, Kus KC, Kurt MA. Geometric  
morphometric study of anterior branches of external carotid artery and carotid bifurcation by 3D-CT  
angiography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2022; 44(7):1029-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-022-  
02985-w.  
74. Sudhakaran M, Alikunju M, Raveendran VL, Govindapillai UK. Variations in the branching pattern  
of external carotid artery in south Kerala population-A cadaveric study. J Evid Based Med Healthc.  
2021; 8(22):1780-85. DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2021/336  
75. Shintani S, Terakado N, Alcalde RE, Tomizawa K, Nakayama S, Ueyama Y, Ichikawa H, Sugimoto  
T, Matsumura T. An anatomical study of the arteries for intraarterial chemotherapy of head and neck  
cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1999; 4:327-30. DOI: 10.1007/s101470050079  
76. Ovhal AG, Ansari MM, Rajgopal L. A cross sectional study of variations in the external carotid artery  
in cadavers. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology. 2016; 3(3):282-6. DOI:  
10.5958/2394-2126.2016.0006.3  
77. Toure T, Ba B, Kante A, Gadji GD, Simpara G, Kante S, Ongoiba N. Superior thyroid artery  
originating from the ascending pharyngeal artery: Case report. SSRN [Preprint]. Posted 17 Apr2023.  
[Cited 2023 November 21]. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4409087  
78. Gwunireama IU, Bob-Manuel IF, Collins GU. A study of morphological variations of carotid  
bifurcation and branching pattern of external carotid artery in adult Nigerian cadavers. Archives of  
Current Research International. 2023; 23(5):40-8. DOI: 10.9734/ACRI/2023/v23i5574  
79. Bunea MC, Chiriloaie C, Rusali LM, Bordei P. Morphological considerations on the origin of the  
superior thyroid artery. Romanian Journal of Functional and Clinical, Macro- and Microscopical  
Anatomy and of Anthropology. 2022; 21(3): 82-6  
Page 570  
80. Anand A, Metgudmath RB, Belaldavar BP. Topographic evaluation of superior thyroid artery- A  
Terrain to be well versed for Surgeon's Knife. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022; 74(Suppl  
3): 5994-6000. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02643-4.  
81. Bozhikova E, Novakov S, Uzunov N. A rare variation in the origin of the lingual artery: thyro-linguo-  
laryngeal trunk. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2023. DOI: 10.5603/fm.95862.  
82. Ray B, Pugazhandhi B, D'Souza AS, Saran S, Fasil M, Srinvasa RS. Analysis of the arterial anatomical  
variations of the thyroid gland: anatomic guide for surgical dissection. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;  
113(11):669-72. DOI: 10.4149/BII_2012_151.  
83. Lu WT, Sun SQ, Huang J, Zhong Y, Xu J, Gan SW, Guo L, Mo TT. An applied anatomical study on  
the external laryngeal nerve loop and the superior thyroid artery in the neck surgical region. Anat Sci  
Int. 2015; 90(4): 209-15. DOI: 10.1007/s12565-014-0246-x.  
84. Orestes MI, Chhetri DK. Superior laryngeal nerve injury: effects, clinical findings, prognosis, and  
management options. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 22(6): 439-43. DOI:  
10.1097/MOO.0000000000000097.  
85. Sadler TW. Langman's Medical Embryology. 12th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &  
Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer; 2012: 207-209  
86. Toni R, Della Casa C, Castorina S, Malaguti A, Mosca S, Roti E, Valenti G. A meta-analysis of  
superior thyroid artery variations in different human groups and their clinical implications. Ann Anat.  
2004; 186:255-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0940-9602(04)80013-x.  
87. Tilahun ZB, Teklesilassie H, Addisie A, Leykun D, Kebede T. Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm of the  
superior thyroid artery after thyroidectomy. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 113:109005. DOI:  
10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109005.  
88. Ernemann U, Herrmann C, Plontke S, Schafer J, Plasswilm L, Skalej M. Pseudoaneurysm of the  
superior thyroid artery following radiotherapy for hypopharyngeal cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.  
2003; 112(2):188-90. DOI: 10.1177/000348940311200215.  
89. Yu NH, Jahng TA, Kim CH, Chung CK. Life-threatening late hemorrhage due to superior thyroid  
artery dissection after anterior cervical siscectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;  
35(15):E739-42. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf46b4.  
90. Wang J, Zheng C, Hou B, Huang A, Zhang X, Du B. Four collateral circulation pathways were  
observed after common carotid artery occlusion. BMC Neurol. 2019; 19(1): 201. DOI:  
10.1186/s12883-019-1425-0.  
91. Dedecjus M, Tazbir J, Kaurzel Z, Lewinski A, Strozyk G, Brzezinski J. Selective embolization of  
thyroid arteries as a preresective and palliative treatment of thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer.  
2007; 14(3):847-52. DOI: 10.1617/ERC-07-0011.  
92. Dedecjus M, Tazbir J, Kaurzel Z, Strozyk G, Zygmunt A, Lewinski A, Brzezinski J. Evaluation of  
selective embolization of thyroid arteries (SETA) as a preresective treatment in selected cases of toxic  
goiter. Thyroid Res. 2009; 2(1):7. DOI: 10.1186/1756-6614-2-7.  
93. EhrI D, Broer PN, Ninkovic M, Giunta RE, Moellhoff N. Extending the indication of the superior  
thyroid artery as a recipient vessel for complex upper body defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2021; 86(5): 551-  
6. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002581.  
Page 571