Experiential Learning in Science for Developing Higher Order  
Thinking Skills (HOTS) & Scientific Temper: A Literature Review  
1Bhimsen Panda, 2Ramakanta Mohalik  
1Research Scholar, RIE, Bhubaneswar, Utkal University, Odisha, India  
2Professor of Education. RIE, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 06 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The quality teaching learning depends on how students are actively engaged in the learning process. Science  
classes should always create a spark among students and motivate them to think critically and design creatively.  
This review paper synthesizes findings from 51 research studies that includes 30 international studies and 21  
national studies on experiential learning. The study specifically explores the impact of experiential learning on  
the development of HOTS, Scientific temper among the secondary students in science. Some selective studies  
are also taken from other subjects. The study has structured around five essential themes emerged from the  
reviewed literatures; the concept of experiential learning, its impact on the effectiveness of science teaching  
learning, its effectiveness in the development of HOTS as well as scientific temper among students & its  
effectiveness in other subjects. The critical analysis reveals positive outcomes in the science learning following  
experiential learning approach though there are significant obstacles in implementing this approach in all schools  
and for all students, The study establishes a foundation for understanding how direct, hands-on engagement with  
scientific concepts can lead to improved critical thinking and scientific curiosity, compared to traditional rote  
learning. The study concludes that experiential learning has a positive effect on the achievement of science in  
secondary stage and suggests for developing comprehensive strategy and lesson plan that can lead higher order  
thinking Skill and scientific temper development. Further studies need to be carried out on the effectiveness of  
experiential learning on the development of HOTS in aspects like creativity and evaluation as well as on  
Scientific temper in aspects like respect for evidence, honesty & integrity, perseverance, and scepticism among  
students as very few studies are there in these areas.  
Keywords: Experiential learning, Science, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Scientific temper, Secondary students  
INTRODUCTION  
21st century education system demands holistic development i.e. the development of 3H (Heart, Hand, and  
Head). The prevailing education system mostly focusses on cognitive development leaving the affective and  
psychomotor aspects aside. This leads to uneven development of a child. This may be due to traditional teacher-  
centred method of teaching. Thus, the need of the hour is the change of pedagogical approach i.e. from teacher  
centred to learner centred approach. Experiential learning (EL) is one such learner centred approach. Kolb (1984)  
in his book Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. emphasizes on active  
participation and reflection on the learning process over the product. It focusses on environment where learning  
can reflect on their experiences and apply them into real life contexts. As per the experiential learning model of  
Kolb, the learning theory works in four stagesconcrete experience, reflective observation, abstract  
conceptualization, and active experimentation.  
Page 678  
Page 678  
The first two stages of the cycle involve grasping an experience, the second two focus on transforming the  
experience. Kolb argues that effective learning is seen as the learner goes through the cycle, and the speciality  
of this model is that the learner can enter the cycle at any time. NEP (2020) framework in Part-I chapter 4  
Curriculum and Pedagogy in Schools: Learning Should be Holistic, Integrated, Enjoyable, and Engaging, under  
sub clause 4.6 writes “In all stages, experiential learning will be adopted, including hands-on learning, arts-  
integrated and sports-integrated education, story-telling-based pedagogy, among others, as standard pedagogy  
within each subject, and with explorations of relations among different subjects. The NEP (2020) document  
further emphasizes on experiential learning under sub clause 4.5, where it writes “reduce curriculum content to  
enhance experiential learning and critical thinking.” Bloom’s taxonomy (1956) describes that Higher-order  
thinking skills (HOTS) include analysis, synthesis, evaluation, problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity,  
that involve complex cognitive processes beyond simple memorization. HOTS represent higher levels of  
thinking where individuals apply, connect, and generate new ideas from existing knowledge, rather than just  
recalling facts. These transferable skills are crucial for lifelong learning, critical thinking, and navigating  
complex situations in real life. Experiential learning fosters critical thinking and Deep learning concludes  
Koulouris (2024). Scientific temper is a rational and questioning attitude towards life and problems,  
characterized by open-mindedness, a reliance on evidence-based reasoning, and a willingness to revise beliefs  
considering new information. It involves applying scientific methods such as questioning, hypothesizing, testing,  
and analysing to make informed choices and solve problems as mentioned by Nehru (1946) in his book The  
Discovery of India. According to the Position Paper of National Focus Group on ‘Teaching of Science’ (p.11)  
one of the aims of Science Education is to cultivate scientific temper, objectivity, critical thinking and freedom  
from fear and prejudice. The concept of scientific temper is crucial for societal progress by promoting critical  
thinking and rejecting superstition and irrational beliefs. It includes aspects like rationality, critical thinking,  
open-mindedness, curiosity, scepticism, respect for evidence, objectivity, honesty & integrity, perseverance etc.  
Chakraborty, et al. (2024) studying on Scientific temper: towards an alternate model of science-society  
relationships argues that scientific temper is fostered through a process-oriented, reflexive approach that is  
cultivated through direct engagement, rather than a top-down deficit model. Students studying in classes 9 to 12  
and aged between 14 to 18 are generally considered as secondary level students as per NEP (2020). The Science  
Council, UK (2009) defined Science as a discipline that seeks to understand the natural and social world through  
systematic observation, experimentation, and the creation of testable hypotheses and predictions. It comprises  
of organized knowledge and a process of discovery, with major branches including the natural, social, and formal  
sciences. Raina (2019) highlighted that improving Science learning can be improved through Experiential hands-  
on activities.  
The above discussion reveals that experiential learning pedagogy is indispensable in class room teaching learning  
interactions as it plays a vital role in the development of basic concepts in science along with HOTS & scientific  
temper among secondary science students.  
Page 679  
Page 679  
Historical and Conceptual Background of Experiential Learning  
Experiential learning's history starts from ancient times, where Aristotle emphasized on “learning by doing" in  
350 BC, and continues to modern educational theory championed by John Dewey in the early 20th century, and  
later synthesized into David Kolb's cyclical model in 1984. The concept gained significant momentum in the  
1970s, recognized as a distinct field with the establishment of the Association for Experiential  
Education (AEE). Today, it is a widely adopted approach in the field of educational pedagogy for fostering active  
engagement, skill development, and the transformation of experience into knowledge across diverse educational  
and professional settings. Experiential learning, as defined by Kolb (1984), is the sort of learning which is  
attained through utilizing experiences specifically in sustaining the teaching-learning procedure. Experiential  
learning theory (ELT), as Kolb (1984) acknowledged, a most pertinent theory as it gives pure basics for learning  
to occur in natural settings. As per Kolb (1984), “Learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through  
the transformation of experience” (p. 38). Learning, according to Kolb (1984), (p.31), “involves the integrated  
functioning of the total organism – thinking, feeling, perceiving, and behaving”. A theory consisted of  
experiential learning may take all mentioned elements into account for processing information into meaningful  
channels based on students’ previous understanding. Moreover, Kolb’s experiential learning theory (ELT)  
(1984) emphasize the transformation of learning as a long-lasting process, and this postulate depicted the  
significant value of the knowledge provided in the classrooms may also be connected to the field of work and  
other life routines outside the educational settings. Several models have been proposed by various educationists  
on Experiential learning theory, out of that the significant theories are 1. Kurt Lewin’s Model of experiential  
Learning 2. John Dewey’s Model of Experiential Learning 3. Jean Piaget’s Model of Experiential Learning 4.  
Carl Roger’s Model of Experiential Learning 5. Maria Montessori’s Model of Experiential Learning 6. David  
Kolb’s Model of Experiential Learning. Out of these models the present class room pedagogies mostly follow  
David Kolb’s Experiential Learning Model. This review paper mostly focusses on David Kolb’s model of  
experiential Learning. Kolb's Model (1984) of Experiential Learning follows a cyclical process of acquiring  
knowledge through experience, transforming it by doing reflection on it, forming concept, and doing  
experimentation, and finally applying it in new ways.  
It is useful in providing a structured framework for creating effective, active learning experiences that enhance  
skill development, promote continuous improvement, fosters reflection and self-awareness, improves motivation  
& Engagement and increase knowledge retention across educational and professional settings. This model  
provides a continuous cycle, allowing for the repetition of the process with new tasks and skills, thereby  
supporting long-term individual and organizational growth.  
So, it can be said that experiential learning is simply learning through reflection on doing. It follows a four-  
stage cyclical model of learning and gives maximum emphasis on reflection and experience.  
Page 680  
Page 680  
Experiential Learning and Science  
Experiential learning is crucial in science as it helps students understand concepts through hands-on activities,  
promotes deeper retention than traditional lectures, fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity by  
linking theoretical knowledge to real-world applications.  
This "learning by doing" approach also builds important life skills like teamwork and communication, making  
learning more engaging, relevant, and memorable for students. Research highlights several findings and  
practices of experiential learning in science classes, including study by Raina (2019) on Improving Science  
learning through Experiential hands-on activities revealed that there was significant difference in the scholastic  
achievement of the students and significant effects on student knowledge gain for those who followed  
experiential hands-on activities. Rani & Kumar (2023) studying on Experiential learning in school education:  
Perspectives and challenges, highlights the significance of experiential learning, challenges in the effective  
implementation of experiential learning in the teaching-learning process, suggestive measures to overcome these  
challenges and concludes that though several initiatives have been taken by Govt. of India to promote the  
implementation of experiential learning in school education, still it takes sincere attention in this regard . study  
by Appa, (2018) on effectiveness of Experiential learning approach on learning attainment attitude towards  
science and science process skills at upper primary level concluded that there is significant improvement in  
promoting the attitude towards science among the students of upper primary by following experiential learning  
approach and the experimental group showed a prolonged understanding of the subject matter, and positive  
attitude towards learning. Study by Thota & Gowri (2020) on Experiential Learning: An Analysis of impact on  
academic achievement among students of Grade 12, concludes that there is a significantly positive impact of  
student’s handmade model as outcome-based learning on the academic performance in subject Chemistry at  
Senior Secondary School level and the learners of experimental group show surprisingly better improvement  
than that of control group. Garibaldis et al. (2018)studying on the application of the experiential learning  
approach in science learning to improve critical thinking in elementary school students concludes that the  
application of the Experiential Learning approach can improve students' critical thinking skills in learning  
science in grade 5.The article by Ranasinghe et al. (2019) studying on the Influence of Experiential Learning  
Models on curiosity and learning achievement in elementary School Science concludes that there is an influence  
of the experiential learning model on curiosity and science learning achievement. study by Sharma & Singh  
(2023) to investigate the effect of experiential learning technique on achievement in science of IX grade students  
revealed that the achievement in science of group exposed to experiential learning technique was significantly  
better than that of group taught through traditional technique. Haryanto et al. (2019) studying on the application  
of the experiential learning model to improve science learning outcomes with hot themes and their transfer in  
elementary schools’ remarks that the Experiential Learning model implemented using the Concrete Experience,  
Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualization, and Active Experimentation steps can improve science  
learning outcomes on the theme of Heat and Transfer in class V of Elementary School. Fauzi et al. (2019)  
Page 681  
Page 681  
studying on Improvement of student learning outcomes using experiential learning models on the concept of  
light in science concluded that the experiential learning model can improve student learning outcomes, especially  
in science learning. Scott et al (2023) on Examining How Experiential Learning Impacts Performance in an  
Introductory Animal Science Course recommended practitioners to use experiential learning to complement  
traditional lectures and to increase knowledge and practical skills. Imroah (2022) studying on efforts to increase  
understanding of the concept of simple electric circuits with experiential learning models in class VI concludes  
that experiential learning is a model of the teaching and learning process that activates learners to build  
knowledge and skills through direct experience. Article by Yuliana et al (2025) on effectiveness of experiential  
learning on students' understanding of science and technology concluded that the experiential learning model is  
very effective for developing the understanding of science and technology .Study by Joshua et al (2023) on the  
effectiveness of experiential learning approach on students’ academic achievement in Biology in Secondary  
Schools concluded that experiential learning approach is an effective method of teaching a science subject and  
teachers engage students in this approach and motivate them to pursue science. Study by Mund (2024) on  
effectiveness of experiential learning on Integrated Science Process Skills among Secondary School Students  
revealed that the students usually have a low level of integrated science process skills and when the experiential  
learning program adapted from Kolb’s learning cycle model was incorporated, the integrated science process  
skills of the learners improved. Study by Devi (2024) on Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligence Theory Oriented  
Experiential Learning Approach on Development of 21st Century Skills and Learning Outcome in Science  
concludes that the experiential learning approach centred on the multiple intelligence theory had a good impact  
on scientific creativity thinking abilities, critical thinking abilities, and learning outcomes. Rukhsana et al (2021)  
studying on effect of experiential learning on Students motivation and interest at elementary level in the subject  
of General Science concludes that experiential learning was effective in teaching science at elementary grade.  
Nguyen et al (2023) researching on Kolb’s experiential learning in STEM Education: A theoretical and empirical  
study with ninth grade students indicates that a moderate relationship between experiential learning stages and  
problem-solving abilities with concrete experience having the strongest effect. Study by Yinka et al(2025)on  
perception of the Experiential learning approach: benefits, impacts and strategies concludes that the experiential  
learning technique is seen by undergraduate students as a very successful way to improve academic  
achievement and the acquisition of practical skills . Article by Geyser et al (2020) on the use of experiential  
learning as a teaching strategy in life sciences describes that use of experiential learning cycle maximizes the  
time and manner of learning in the life sciences class room. Julinda et al (2022) concludes that experiential  
learning model improves learning outcomes in the subject science in class Kumar (2022) studying on  
effectiveness of experiential learning pedagogy on science process skills, scientific attitude, and achievement in  
science of secondary School tribal students in Kerala concluded that the pedagogical module has significant  
effect in enhancing the scientific attitude, science process skills, and achievement in science. Jannah & Sofiya  
(2023) researching on implementation of experiential learning model to improve science process skills proves  
that learning using the experiential learning model can make students understand the material in depth, which is  
taught through the search process carried out by students. Study by Falloon (2019) on using simulations to teach  
young students science concepts: An experiential learning theoretical analysis, concludes that simulations can  
be effective for introducing young students to simple physical science concepts, and for providing them with  
opportunities to engage in higher order thinking process. Article by Susiloningsih et al (2023) on experiential  
learning model in science learning: Systematic literature review, indicates that there is an influence of the  
experiential learning model on science learning in elementary schools .Hwang (2019) on the study from  
reflective observation to active learning: A mobile experiential learning approach for environmental science  
education, concludes that learners who learned through experiential learning approach showed higher problem-  
solving competence than those who learned with the conventional situated mobile learning approach.  
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that experiential learning is quite useful in science learning  
particularly at secondary level. It paves the way for academic achievement and enhances the learning outcomes  
side by side making science learning joyful and engaging.  
Limitations of Experiential learning  
There are challenges from inadequate infrastructure and resources, teacher training and capacity building,  
curriculum alignment, assessment and evaluation, equity and access, community engagement, and partnerships.  
Seerat (2014), and Rani & Shivani (2021), reported that experiential learning is difficult to use in a limited given  
Page 682  
Page 682  
time. Giving practical experiences and having students’ reflections on their experience, need time to design and  
implement. Nooghabi et al (2011) remarks that the lack of facilities for carrying out practical work, lack of space  
for outdoor and indoor activities, and even no proper furniture, laboratories, and other basic equipment act as a  
hurdle to implementing experiential learning. Difficulties in accessing experiential learning opportunities for  
teachers to implement particularly in rural areas are very challenging because of the lack of basic resources  
and facilities reports McDougal (2014).Nooghabi et al and Rani & Shivani (2021) emphasizes that the lack of  
teacher’s knowledge about the latest skills, devices, innovations, and skills for practicum/practical tasks and  
field visits, and any other experiential activity is a barrier in using experiential learning. Reddipalli and  
Rajesh Babu (2018) highlighted that not all units are suitable to design based on experiential learning in terms  
of the teacher's expertise. Singh & Shakir (2019) and Hossain (2021) remarks that providing ample opportunities  
to teachers for their self-development and updating their knowledge and skills to the innovations will facilitate  
experiential learning. Nooghabi et al (2011) & Mc Dougal (2014) highlights that lack of flexibility in the time  
schedule, rigid rules, and regulations, and less coordination with community, villages, etc. also act as a barrier  
for the smooth implementation of experiential learning in school.  
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that several challenges are faced in implementing experiential  
learning in true sense in class room transactions. Inspite of that experiential learning is useful in science learning  
and it adds flavour to the education at secondary level.  
Impact of experiential learning on development of HOTS  
Experiential learning and HOTS are interconnected concepts that emphasize learning through active engagement  
and Critical Thinking, analysis and problem solving. The AI overview research findings suggests that Students  
learn by doing and engaging in hands on activities and reflecting on their experiences. HOTS enable students to  
think critically, analyse complex situations, and solve problems effectively. Analysing information, evaluating  
arguments, synthesizing ideas, and developing innovative solutions are examples of HOTS.  
The findings further reveals that the content and opportunities for students to practice and develop HOTS. By  
actively engaging in activities, students are naturally challenged to think critically, analyse information, and  
solve problems. Study by Senapati &Selvam (2025) reveals that the there is strong effect of experiential learning  
coupled with thinking-based learning (TBL) pedagogy in developing higher-order thinking skills among  
students. Indah (2020) concludes that discovery Learning Model Increases the Critical Thinking Skill and HOTS  
among Students of class XI. Pamunkeys &Widia Stuti (2019) studying on 21st Century Learning: Experiential  
Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking in Vocational Education finds that the experiential learning in vocational  
Page 683  
Page 683  
education is effective in developing critical thinking among students. Artika & Nurmaliah (2023) concludes that  
the habituation of HOTS-based science questions can effectively improve students' critical thinking. Mertayasa  
et. al (2024) finds that the students engaged in experiential learning show increased cognitive activity, more  
comprehensive participation, and high motivation to develop critical thinking skills. Koulouris (2024) studying  
on Experiential learning fosters critical thinking and deep learning concludes that, through experiential learning  
students are no longer passively engaged with lecture materials but are actively observing, analysing, and  
participating through field education. Researches by Ranjan (2024) on how experiential learning helps in  
developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills concludes that Experiential learning effectively develops  
critical thinking and problem-solving skills by engaging students in active, reflective, and collaborative learning  
processes.  
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that experiential learning develops critical thinking. Very few  
studies are there that are focussing on the effectiveness of experiential learning on the development of HOTS,  
though some studies are carried on certain aspects of HOTS like analysis, problem solving and critical thinking  
still further research need to be carried out in other aspects like creativity and evaluation.  
Impact of experiential learning on development of Scientific temper  
Experiential learning develops scientific temper by replacing rote memorization with hands-on activities that  
foster a scientific method of questioning, experimenting, and reflecting. Both are intertwined; experiential  
learning provides the practical, engaging activities that build the critical thinking and analytical skills essential  
for a scientific temper.  
This approach is more effective than traditional learning for building interest in science and creating a mindset  
of curiosity and rational inquiry. Some studies on experiential learning and scientific temper reveals that  
Experiential learning has impact on the development of scientific temper among the students. Some remarks that  
aspects like critical thinking and scepticism towards superstitions gets improved when students do hands on  
activities and engage themselves in Experiential learning. Chakraborty et al (2024) studying on Scientific  
temper: towards an alternate model of science-society relationships argues that scientific temper is fostered  
through a process-oriented, reflexive approach that is cultivated through direct engagement, rather than a top-  
down deficit model. DPS Warangal in its Blog post (2024) on the topic how to develop scientific temperament  
in students Cites curiosity and critical thinking, which are developed through experiential learning, as  
fundamental to scientific temper. KVS RO Jabalpur, Blog post (2024) on developing scientific temperament  
highlights that experiential, inquiry-based methods like experimentation, observation, and communication are  
essential for cultivating scientific temper. Shiv Nadar School, Blog post (2021) describes that a scientific temper  
from early childhood by encouraging curiosity, critical thinking, and a "hands-on, minds-on" approach involving  
experiential learning activities build confidence in the scientific process, reinforcing a scientific temperament.  
Page 684  
Page 684  
ResearchGate (2021) on development of scientific temper through the Teaching of Science at Secondary Schools  
Reviews various pedagogies that can help develop scientific temper, which includes healthy scepticism,  
rationality, and open-mindedness. The study notes that methods involving learner participation and real-world  
experience foster scientific temper. Kumar & Sharma (2019) studying on Developing Scientific Temper in  
School Studentsfound that project-based learning and inquiry-based science education significantly correlate  
with higher levels of scientific temper. Das & Gupta (2021) studying on the topic Role of Science Museums in  
Fostering Scientific Temper Concluded that interactive exhibits and hands-on activities in science museums are  
effective in stimulating curiosity and a questioning attitude. Patel (2020) studying on effectiveness of workshops  
on Promoting Scientific Temper concludes that training on scientific temper concepts and pedagogical strategies  
led to positive changes in the scientific temper of students along with improved classroom practices and students'  
attitudes.  
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that experiential learning develops scientific temper. Very few  
studies are there on the impact of experiential learning for the development of scientific temper among students.  
some studies are carried on certain aspects of scientific temper like open mindedness, rationality, and curiosity,  
still further research need to be carried out on other aspects like Respect for evidence, Honesty & integrity,  
perseverance, and scepticism of scientific temper.  
Experiential Learning & other Subjects  
The effect of experiential learning on achievement in other subjects is also studied by taking some limited  
number of studies. Gugale (2023) on the study effectiveness of experiential learning in History among CBSE  
Secondary School students concludes that Experiential learning is effective for the understanding and concept  
clearance of History for CBSE Secondary School students as students developed interest in the subject History  
and their learning outcomes were improved. Karthiyayeni and Geethalakshmi (2025) studied on effectiveness of  
experiential learning in developing attitude towards learning social science Among 9th Standard Students  
concluded that attitude plays an important role as prerequisite in learning social science. Development of the  
attitude of learning social science lies in the hands of parents, teachers, and students as well along with various  
methods, The study also reveals that there is no significant difference between experimental group and control  
group in attitude across and within different groups about their gender. Villarroel et al (2020) studying on  
experiential learning in higher education describes that by following the phases and modes of experiential  
learning, the students´ had a positive perception about the quality of their learning. Specifically, they valued the  
opportunity to apply their knowledge, learn in greater depth, remembering it better, as well as being able to make  
a concrete contribution, from the discipline, to solve a real problem. Kong (2021) on the role of Experiential  
learning on students’ motivation and class room engagement reports that the learners are encouraged to think  
logically, find solutions, and take appropriate action in relevant situations. The learners enthusiastically  
participate in mental, emotional, and social interactions during the learning procedure within experiential  
learning. study by Yakun et al (2022) On experiential learning: A view of the literature writes that the learning  
experience is conducted by teachers in school to help students understand more about the subject concept during  
teaching and learning. The study reveals that the learning theory introduced by Kolb helps more in the education  
system to understand the environment and learning process. Study by Chopra & Lakshmi (2022) on effect of  
experiential learning strategies on learning outcomes and interpersonal skills of senior secondary students in  
relation to learning approaches revealed significant difference in learning outcomes and interpersonal skills of  
experimental group in comparison to control group due to intervention of experiential learning strategies and  
experimental group scored better in both dependent variables. Ramesh (2025) on Scientific Temper in Indian  
Education System - A Historical Perspective Provides a historical perspective on scientific temper in India,  
emphasizing its importance for promoting rational inquiry and evidence-based decision-making notes that  
education is a key vehicle for promoting scientific temper in students.  
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that experiential learning has impact on other subjects as well.  
The experiential learning cycle can be followed in other subjects for the development of HOTS as well as  
interpersonal skills.  
Page 685  
Page 685  
Recommendations for Future Research  
Further research needs to be carried out on various aspects of scientific temper like creativity, evaluative  
thinking, integrity aspects etc. so that the detailed and comprehensive ideas can be gathered on the usefulness of  
experiential learning.  
CONCLUSIONS  
Most of the studies concludes that experiential learning has a positive effect on the achievement of science in  
secondary stage but there is no mention whether such approach is developing higher order thinking skills or not.  
Some studies categorically remark that experiential learning approach is essential for scientific temperament but  
no such specific study is found that highlights whether experiential learning is effective or not in developing  
scientific temper among secondary students. Almost no studies are found that gives a comparative analysis  
between experiential learning and traditional pedagogies in similar contexts. Very few studies are there that are  
focussing on the effectiveness of experiential learning on the development of HOTS as well as Scientific temper  
among students and most of them are silent whether the experiential learning approach is developing all aspects  
of higher order thinking skills or not. Though some studies are carried on certain aspects of HOTS like analysis,  
problem solving and critical thinking, still further research need to be carried out on other aspects like creativity  
and evaluation of HOTS, similarly in scientific temper some studies are carried on certain aspects like open  
mindedness, rationality, and curiosity, still further research need to be carried out on other aspects like Respect  
for evidence, Honesty & integrity, perseverance, and scepticism. As experiential learning is an emerging  
pedagogy, further research must be carried on how experiential learning is effective in developing higher order  
thinking skills as well as scientific temper among secondary students in science.  
REFERENCES  
1. Adams, K. S. (2018). Motivation? The effects of high-impact experiential learning  
activities on  
political science students. SSRN Electronic Journal, 925. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178985.  
2. Agsalog, M. S. (2019). Experiential learning approach: Its effects on the academic performance and  
motivation to learn physics of grade 10 students. International Journal of Scientific and Research  
Publications (IJSRP), 9(9), p93113. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.9.09.201 9.p93113.  
3. Amin, D. I., and J. Ikhsan. (2021). Improving higher order thinking skills via semi second life. European  
Journal of Educational Research 10 (1):26174.doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.261.  
4. Arnold, S., & Warner, W. J. (2006). Experiential learning in secondary agricultural education classrooms.  
Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 56, (1), 23-34.  
5. Association for Experiential Education, (1994) The Heuristic Method, Precursor of Guided Inquiry:  
Henry Armstrong and British Girls’ Schools, 1890–1920, Geoff Rayner Canham and Marelene Rayner  
Canham, (2015)  
6. Avelino, G., Ignacio, J., & Joseph, D. R. (2017). Exploring mathematics achievement goals using Kolb’s  
learning style model. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 19-24.  
7. Baker, M. A., Robinson, J. S., & Kolb, D. K. (2012). Aligning Kolb’s experiential learning theory with  
a comprehensive agricultural education model. Journal of Agricultural Education. 53(4), 1-16.  
8. Beard, C., & Wilson, J. (2006). Experiential learning: A best practice hand book for educators and  
trainers. Philadelphia: Kogan page.  
9. Casagrand, J., and K. Semsar. 2017. Redesigning a course to help students achieve higher order cognitive  
thinking skills: From goals and mechanics to student outcomes. Advances in Physiology Education, 41  
(2):194202. doi: 10.1152/advan.00102.2016.  
10. Central Board of Secondary Education. (2019). Experiential learning-A story by Padhkar Kumar and  
Karkar Kumari. Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Delhi. CBSE.  
11. Chakraborty, A. & Giuffredi, R. (2019). Science and technology for the people? On the framing of  
innovation in policy discourses in India and in EU. JCOM 18 (03), A05. doi:10.22323/2.18030205  
12. Craig, M. (1997). David A. Kolb on Experiential learning: the encyclopaedia of information education.  
Page 686  
Page 686  
13. David, A. K. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J.  
Sternberg & L. F. Zhang, Perspectives on cognitive learning and thinking styles. New Jersey: Prentice  
Hall.  
learning-in-school-education.  
15. Ghani, I. B. A., N. H. Ibrahim, N. A. Yahaya, and J. Surif. 2017. Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory  
educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education  
Research and Practice 18 (4 Grossen, B. 1991. The fundamental skills of higher order thinking. Journal  
of Learning Disabilities 24 (6):34353. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400603.  
16. Ives, B., & Obenchain, K. (2006). Experiential education in the classroom and academic outcomes: For  
those who want it all. Journal of Experiential Education, 290, 61-77.  
17. Keeton, M.T. & Tata P. J. (1978). The Boom in Experiential Learning. In M. T. Keeton, & P. J. Tata  
(Eds.), Learning by Experience: What, why, how. California: Jossey Bass, San Francisco.  
18. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-  
Hall Polk, D. M. (2013). Cultivating self-awareness with team- teaching: Connections between  
classroom learning and experiential learning. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(2), 122-135.  
19. Kolb, D., Fry, R. (1970) Experiential learning: Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. in C.  
Cooper (ed.), Theories of Group Process, London: John Wiley.  
20. Mahanti, S. (2016). Nehru’s vision of scientific temper. Journal of Scientific Temper 4 (3&4), 154166.  
21. McDougal, K. (2014). Experiential learning for the history classroom: engaging learners on different  
levels and in different ways to encourage a lifelong love of learning. April 2014  
22. Nooghabia, S. N., Iravanib, H., & Fami, H. S. (2011). A study on present challenges on experiential  
learning of university students. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 15 35223530.  
23. Panda, B, (2025), Impact of Experiential Learning in developing Critical Thinking among Secondary  
Students in Science, International seminar of ICSSR on Quality Education in the 21st Century, March  
2025  
24. Powell, K., & Wells, M. (2010). The effectiveness of three experiential teaching approaches on student’s  
science learning in fifth-grade public school classrooms. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(2),  
33-38.  
25. Rani, R. & Shivani. (2021). Effect of experiential learning programme on academic achievement, science  
self-efficacy, and scientific attitude of secondary school Students, (Ph.D. Thesis, Panjab University).  
Retrieved from Sodhganga@INFLIBNET.  
26. Reddipalli, R. (2018). Effectiveness of experiential learning approach on learning attainment, attitude  
towards science and science process skills in science at upper primary level, (Ph.D. Thesis, Department  
of Education, Regional Institute Education National Council of Educational Research and training,  
Mysore Retrieved from Sodhganga @INFLIBNET.  
27. Sarmah, A. (2020). Cognitive Skills The List of Cognitive Capabilities, (12/01/2020 Retrieved from  
28. Sharma, N., Akhter, Y. & Mir, S. A. (2020). Science education in India: a misnomer for scientific  
temper. Journal of Scientific Temper 8 (3&4), 135145. doi:10.56042/jst. v8i3-4.67420  
29. Thote, P., & Gowri, S. (2021). Outcome based learning: the effect of experiential learning activities on  
the attainment of specific learning outcome among senior secondary school students. International  
Journal of Research GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(4), 28-42.  
30. Tong, D. T., Loc, N. P., Uyen, B. P., & Cuong, P. H. (2020). Applying experiential learning to teaching  
the equation of a circle: A case study. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 239-255.  
31. Various (2024, February 28). Statement on scientific temper in the current context. Kolkata, India.  
Retrieved  
May  
14,  
2024,  
32. William, A. (1990). Effects of experiential learning on knowledge acquisition, skill mastery, and student  
attitudes. United States: Purdue University.  
Page 687  
Page 687