INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 738
www.rsisinternational.org
Correlation between Mindfulness Level and Cognitive Efficiency
among Higher Secondary Students
Dr. R. Portia
Assistant Professor, Alagappa University College of Education, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil
Nadu
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110066
Received: 21 November 2025; Accepted: 29 November 2025; Published: 08 December 2025
ABSTRACT
The goal of the study was to investigate the connection between higher secondary students cognitive efficiency
and mindfulness. The capacity to sustain present moment awareness with openness and nonjudgmental is
known as mindfulness and it has been associated with improve executive functioning working memory and
attention. Academic success depends on cognitive efficiency which includes attentions control information
processing speed and problem solving skills. In this study stratified random selection was used to choose a
sample of 200 students (100 boys and 100 girls) from government and private schools in Tamil Nadu for the
correlation research design. The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) was used to examine
mindfulness and a standardized cognitive efficiency inventory was used to test cognitive efficiency.
Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation and independent sample t-test were used in the data analysis.
Higher levels of mindfulness are linked to improve cognitive functioning according to the study finding which
showed a strong positive connection between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency. While there was no
discernible gender difference in cognitive efficiency gender analysis revealed that girls scored significantly
higher those boys in mindfulness. These results highlight how importance it is to include mindfulness based
activities in school curricula and teacher preparation programs. It is advised that future studies use
experimental or longitudinal designs to determine causal links and look at long term higher level of
mindfulness are linked to improve cognitive functioning.
Keywords: Mindfulness, Cognitive efficiency, Higher Secondary Students, Attention, Working Memory
INTRODUCTION
A statement by Steinberg (2017), one of the most revolutionary phases of human development adolescence is
marked by quick social, emotional and cognitive development. People start to build their identities become
independent and acquire higher order cognitive skills at this time. These development shifts correspond with
increased academic obligations competitive exams and social obstacles for higher secondary students, who are
usually between the ages of 16 and 18. Stress anxiety and emotional disorders are frequently brought on by the
pressure to perform well academically which can have a detrimental effect on focus judgment and learning
effectiveness (Bhasin & Sharma, 2020). In this regard developing mindfulness has become a useful tactic to
improve teenagers’ psychological health and cognitive abilities.
Kabat Zinn (1994) defined mindfulness as the deliberate non-judgmental practices of paying attention to the
present moment. It entails self awareness acceptance and deliberate control over one’s feeling and thoughts.
From its traditional Buddhist origins mindfulness has developed over the past 20 years into a well recognized
secular psychological concept that is used in the fields of business education and health (Baer, 2019).
Improved attention regulation emotional equilibrium and meta-cognitive awareness, all essential elements of
learning are linked to mindfulness in educational psychology (Roeser at. Al., 2013; Schonert Reichl & Lawlor,
2010).
Conversely cognitive efficiency is the capacity to make economical and effective use of cognitive resources
including working memory reasoning and attention (Diamond, 2013). It includes people’s ability to
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 739
www.rsisinternational.org
comprehend information quickly and properly while reducing mental strain. More attention adaptability and
problem solving skills are displayed by students with increased cognitive efficiency (Best & Miller, 2010).
According to the research mindfulness based techniques can improve sustained attention and lessen mind
wandering which can improve various elements of cognition (Zeidan et,al., 2020). This perspectives is further
supported by the attention control hypothesis put forth by Eysenck et,al. (2007) which suggests that
mindfulness improves attention deployment and reduce anxiety to stabilize cognitive processes.
The importance of mindfulness in Indian education has received a lot of attention lately. In the order to attain
mental clarity and self discipline traditional Indian philosophy has traditionally placed a strong emphasis on
awareness and meditation (Rao, 2016). However the current educational system frequently ignores students’
emotional and cognitive health in favor of rote memorization and performance oriented learning (Kaur & kaur,
2020). Teenagers who experience this imbalance are more likely to experience academic burnout and lower
willingness to learn. By fostering self awareness empathy and focus including mindfulness into school
curricula may offer a comprehensive alternative (Verma & Mehta, 2022). According to research conducted in
India, mindfulness training improves students’ academic motivation stress tolerance and meta-cognitive
awareness (Kumar & Rani,; Sharma & Singh, 2019). These result demonstrate how mindfulness can be used as
a teaching method to promote cognitive order to attain mental clarity and self discipline traditional Indian
philosophy has traditionally placed a strong emphasis on awareness and meditation (Rao, 2016). However the
current educational system frequently ignores students’ emotional and cognitive health in favor of rote
memorization and performance learning (Kuar & Kuar, 2020).
Numerous empirical investigations conducted worldwide have verified the beneficial correlations between
mindfulness and a range of cognitive factors. Even a short 4 day mindfulness training increased participants
processing speed and cognitive flexibility, according to Zeidan et.al., (2020). Similarly Zenner et,al., (2014)
found that an 8 week mindfulness training significantly improved high school students attention span and
cognitive function. Patil & Shinde (2021) found that mindfulness enhances cognitive efficiency via
mechanisms of emotion regulation attention control and meta-cognitive awareness.
Despite these promising results there is still a dearth of studies that explicity look at the connection between
Indian higher secondary students’ levels of mindfulness and cognitive efficiency. It is crucial to look at
whether mindfulness actually predicts cognitive functioning given the unique socio-cultural and educational
challenges this group faced. When creating school based mindfulness treatments targeted at enhancing learning
outcomes and mental health educators’ psychologists and legislators can benefit greatly from an understanding
of this relationship.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
An analytical grasp of the theoretical and empirical studies carried out in the fields of mindfulness and
cognitive efficiency can be obtained through a review of literature. The purpose of the current studies is to look
into the connection between higher secondary students’ degrees of mindfulness and their cognitive efficiency.
In order to determine current trends research gap and areas for future investigation papers from both
international and national contexts are examined.
International Contexts
Over the past 20 years there has been a notable surge in research on mindfulness and cognitive functioning.
Research from several nations has shown that mindfulness based activities can greatly improve executive
functioning working memory and attention all of which are essential components of cognitive efficiency.
In a groundbreaking study on undergraduate students Tang & Posner (2018), investigated the brain
mechanisms underlying mindfulness training. Participants in the study demonstrated increased activation in the
anterior cingulated cortex an area of the brain linked to attention regulation and cognitive control following a
short session of integrative body mind training (IBMT). The results showed that practicing mindfulness
improves working memory and executive functioning while also promoting emotional equilibrium by
strengthening selg regulation mechanisms. The scientists came to the conclusion that via altering brain activity
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 740
www.rsisinternational.org
and neural connections mindfulness enhance overall cognitive performance. In a similar vein, Jha & Dreyfuss
(2019) examined how and 8 weeks mindfulness attention training program affected college students working
memory and sustained attention. According to their research, mindfulness meditation improves sustained
attention and lessens mind wandering tendencies which improve task performance and academic production.
The ability to stay focused on goal directed tasks is strengthened by mindfulness which improves cognitive
processing efficiency. Zeidan et.al., (2020) investigated the impact of 4 day mindfulness training on stress
management and cognitive flexibility in another significant study. Even a brief period of mindfulness practice
enhanced cognitive flexibility and decreased stress related cognitive interference according to the study which
used a within subject experimental approach. The finding demonstrated that by enhancing information
processing and intentional shifting mindfulness can quickly affect cognitive efficiency. Chiesa & Serretti
(2021) investigated the effects of mindfulness meditational on cognitive control processes through a meta-
analysis. According to their research mindfulness enhance prefrontal brain activation which promotes better
working memory attention control and decision making. According to the study mindfulness fosters meta-
cognitive awareness which enables people to successfully monitor and control their through a sign of cognitive
efficiency. Additionally Lin & Huang (2021) investigated the mindfulness levels of Taiwanese High School
students’ and their correlation with academic and self efficacy and cognitive performance. They found that
people who were more conscious demonstrated improved memory retrieval and greater confidence when
solving problems. The writers came to the conclusion that mindfulness enhances learning motivational and
cognitive aspects. Adolescents who participated in mindfulness based programs showed improved working
memory span and decreased cognitive load when solving problems according to a new recent neuro-cognitive
studies by Roca & Fernandex (2022). The results of functional MRI showed increased activity in areas linked
to inhibitory control and executive attention. Through increased brain efficiency and decreased distractibility
their findings offered neuro-scientific support for the importance of mindfulness in improving cognitive
efficiency. Additionally in an intervention based study involving high school students in the UK, Thompson
and Gilbert (2023) found that 8 week mindfulness training greatly enhance task accuracy resilience to
distractions and cognitive processing speed. According to the authors practicing mindfulness can help reduce
exam stress which in turn improves cognitive performance. All of this research point to the positive effects of
mindfulness practices on executive functioning attention stability and meta-cognitive awareness which results
in increased cognitive efficiency.
Indian Contexts
Research on mindfulness in the context of education is continuously expanding in India. Its significance in
resolving the emotional and cognitive difficulties teenagers have in competitive academic setting has been
acknowledged by academic.
In the order to ascertain the effect of mindfulness practices on attention control and academic engagement,
Sharma and Singh (2019) studied 300Indian teenagers. They discovered a significant positive correlation
between students’ capacity to maintain focus throughout learning activities and mindfulness using the MAAS
(Mindful Attention Awareness Scale). According to their study students’ who received mindfulness training
were better able to control their distractions and had higher levels of academic engagement. Kumar & Rani
(2020) investigated meta-cognitive awareness and mindfulness disposition in Delhi upper primary school
students’. The finding showed that students with greater mindfulness dispositions had superior meta-cognitive
regulation and self monitoring abilities which are essential for cognitive efficiency. According to the study
mindfulness helps students’ identity and manages their cognitive process which promotes reflective thinking
and improves problem solving effectiveness. Likewise, Patil & Shinde (2021) looked into how frequent
mindfulness meditation affected Maharashtra Secondary School students’ working memory and focus. They
found that students who engaged in mindfulness practices for 6 weeks significantly outperformed the control
group in terms of memory recall and information processing accuracy using a quasi experimental
methodology. The researchers came to the conclusion that mindfulness lessens cognitive fatigue enabling more
fluid. The finding showed that students with greater mindfulness dispositions had superior meta-cognitive
regulation and self monitoring abilities which are essential for cognitive efficiency. According to the study
mindfulness helps students identify and manage their cognitive processes which promote reflective thinking
and improve problem solving effectiveness.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 741
www.rsisinternational.org
Objectives of the Study
The study objectives are:
To find the level of mindfulness among higher secondary students.
To find the level of cognitive efficiency among higher secondary students.
To find the correlation between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency among higher secondary students.
To scrutinize the gender difference in mindfulness and cognitive efficiency among higher secondary
students.
Hypotheses of the Study
The study hypotheses statement is:
There is no significant level of mindfulness among higher secondary students.
There is no significant level of cognitive efficiency among higher secondary students.
There is no significant correlation between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency among higher
secondary students.
There is no significant gender difference in mindfulness and cognitive efficiency among higher
secondary students.
METHODOLOGY
Study Design
To investigate the relation between higher secondary students’ level of mindfulness and cognitive efficiency
the current study used a correlation research methodology. Without changing the variables correlation
investigations are helpful in determine the strength and direction of a relationship between two or more
variables (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The main factors in this study were cognitive efficiency and
mindfulness and the level to which one affects the other was statistically examined. As indicated by the study
goals and hypothesis the study design also made it easy to compare gender differences. Because it is enables to
researchers to examined naturally existing differences in mindfulness and cognitive functioning among higher
secondary educational setting through correlation study design was used.
Population and Sample
The participants in this study were higher secondary students in Class Xi and XII from both government and
private schools in Tamil Nadu. Adolescents aged 16 to 18 are at a developmental phase where their cognitive
abilities attention management and emotional regulation experience considerable changes (Steinberg, 2017).
Therefore they are a suitable group for exploring the impact of mindfulness on cognitive performance.
To significant representation of gender and type of institution (government and private) a sample of 200
students was chosen using the stratified random sampling technique. There were 100 boys and 100 girls in the
sample. While according for sampling bias, stratified random sampling assisted in preserving variation among
subgroups (Kothari & Garg, 2019). In order to offer a fair assessment of various educational setting
participants were chosen from 4 schools, 2 government and 2 private schools.
Only students who were willing to participate willingly and had no prior considerable instruction in yoga or
mindfulness were included in order to ensure validity. Throughout the study ethical principle like informed
consent and response confidentially were appropriately upheld.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 742
www.rsisinternational.org
Tool Used
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) created by Brown and Ryan (2003) was used to measure
mindfulness. A popular self report tool the MAAS has 15 items with ratings on a 6 point Likert scale that goes
from almost always to almost never. Greater mindfulness is indicated by higher scores which show peoples
capacity to stay aware of and pay attention to their experience in the present. The MAAS exhibits strong
reliability coefficients = 0.86) and has been evaluated in a variety of cultural situations including
educational setting.
Cognitive Efficiency Scale (CES)
A standardized Cognitive Efficiency Scale (CES) created by the researcher from validated psychological
inventory intended to examine working memory attention and processing speed was used to measure cognitive
efficiency. The scale usually consists of measures that assess a person’s ability to process information
effectively maintain focus and make prompt accurate decisions. The instruments internal consistency reliability
(Cronbach’s alpha) was determined to be satisfactory = 0.82). The scoring process produced sub domain
and memory composite scores for overall cognitive efficiency.
Both tools were chosen for their applicability dependability and simplicity of use in a classroom setting.
Data collection process
The principal of each school gave their official consent before any data was collected. To explain the goal and
importance of the study to participants and administrators the researchers personally visited the school. In
order to lessen reaction anxiety and acquaintance people with the idea of mindfulness a quick orientation
session was held. During regular School our data where generated in a group setting. Participants received
assurance that there answer would be kept private and use only for academic research. Each group needed
about 30 to 40 minutes to administer the MAAS and cognitive efficiency scale. Two guarantee the legitimacy
of their answers the student completed the service on their own without consulting one another. Before the data
was coded for analyze completed questionnaires where truly examined to make sure no answer was missing.
Following the American psychological association apa 2022 rules for research involving human subjects
ethical research standard wire is maintained throughout. None of the participants were subjected to undue
influence of coercion.
Statistical Techniques
SPSS (version 25) was used to analyze the collected data. The distribution of mindfulness and community
efficiency scores among upper secondary students was described using descriptive statistics like mean and
standard division (SD). The degree of correlations between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency was
measured using the Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) in order to access the main premise.
Independent samples t-test were used to examine gender differences in cognitive efficiency and mindfulness.
For all inferential tests a significant level of p < 0.01 was used. The researchers was able to confirm whether
there is a substantial correlation between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency as well as weather this
associations d for depending on gender using this statistical approach.
The statistical tools enables through association testing without going against normalcy assumptions and are
appropriate for continuous variables. These techniques produced analytical results that provide empirical
support for accepting or rejecting the development null hypothesis.
Finding
The studies main goal was to investigate the correlation between higher secondary student’s levels of
mindfulness and cognitive efficiency. Descriptive Statistics Pearson’s correlations and independent sample t-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 743
www.rsisinternational.org
test where used to examine data gathered from 200 students (100 boys and 100 girls). The findings are given
under pertinent areas and then they are thoroughly interpreted and discussed in relation to earlier research.
Descriptive Statistics of Mindfulness and Cognitive Efficiency
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics of Mindfulness and Cognitive Efficiency among Higher Secondary Students (N
= 200)
Variable
N
Mean
SD
Maximum
Mindfulness (MAAS)
200
67.45
8.72
85
Cognitive Efficiency
200
72.18
9.04
90
The table 1 was indicated that the overall mean score for mindfulness among higher secondary students was
67.45 which suggesting a moderate level of mindfulness awareness and attention to the present moment. The
SD shows a reasonable spread indicating variability in mindfulness practices among students. The mean score
for cognitive efficiency was 72.18 reflecting that most students demonstrated a moderate to high level of
efficiency in cognitive domains such as attention working memory and processing speed. This finding aligns
with Sharma & Singh (2019) study which reported that adolescents with higher mindfulness level and to
exhibit better concentration and cognitive engagement.
Figure 1: Mean Score of Mindfulness and Cognitive Efficiency
Correlation between Mindfulness and Cognitive Efficiency
To examine the primary hypothesis, the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation was computed between
mindfulness and cognitive efficiency scores.
Table 2: Correlation between Mindfulness and Cognitive Efficiency
Variable
N
r
p-value
Significance
Mindfulness × Cognitive Efficiency
200
0.61
0.000
Significant (p < 0.01)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 744
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 1: Scatter Plot Showing the Relationship between Mindfulness and Cognitive Efficiency
As shown in Table 2, the correlation coefficient between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency was r = 0.61,
which is statistically significant at the 0.01 level. This positive and moderately strong correlation suggests that
students with higher mindfulness levels tend to have greater cognitive efficiency. This finding confirms the
rejection of Null Hypothesis 1, which stated that “There is no significant correlation between mindfulness level
and cognitive efficiency among higher secondary students.” The result corroborates previous research by Tang
et al. (2018) and Jha, Morrison, & Dreyfuss (2019), who found that mindfulness interventions enhance
attention regulation, cognitive flexibility, and working memory. Similarly, Zeidan et al. (2020) emphasized
that even brief mindfulness practices can enhance information processing efficiency and reduce cognitive
interference. In the context of Indian education, these findings echo Kumar & Rani (2020) and Verma &
Mehta (2022), who demonstrated that mindfulness disposition positively influences metacognitive awareness
and self-regulation among secondary school students. Thus, the current study extends these findings by
empirically validating the mindfulnesscognition relationship among higher secondary learners in Tamil Nadu.
Gender Differences in Mindfulness
To test Hypothesis 2, which stated that “There is no significant difference between boys and girls in their
mindfulness level,” an independent samples t-test was conducted.
Table 3: Gender Differences in Mindfulness among Higher Secondary Students
Gender
N
Mean
SD
t-value
p-value
Significance
Boys
100
66.32
8.65
1.98
0.049
Significant (p < 0.05)
Girls
100
68.58
8.70
In the table 3, the t-test result (t = 1.98, p = 0.049) indicates a significant difference between boys and girls in
mindfulness levels, with girls (M = 68.58) scoring slightly higher than boys (M = 66.32). This finding suggests
that girls tend to exhibit greater self-awareness, emotional regulation, and attention control, which may stem
from differences in coping mechanisms and learning attitudes. This observation aligns with Sharma & Singh
(2019), who found that female adolescents often engage more effectively in reflective and mindful thinking.
Similarly, Patil & Shinde (2021) noted that adolescent girls benefit more from mindfulness practices in terms
of emotional regulation and academic focus. Hence, Hypothesis 2 is rejected, indicating a gender-based
variation in mindfulness among higher secondary students.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 745
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 3: Table 3: Gender Differences in Mindfulness among Higher Secondary Students
Gender Differences in Cognitive Efficiency
To test Hypothesis 3, which stated that “There is no significant difference between boys and girls in their
cognitive efficiency,” another t-test was applied.
Table 4: Gender Differences in Cognitive Efficiency among Higher Secondary Students
Gender
N
Mean
SD
t-value
p-value
Significance
Boys
100
71.05
9.32
1.72
0.086
Not Significant
Girls
100
73.31
8.71
As presented in Table 4, the t-value (1.72, p = 0.086) was found to be statistically non-significant, suggesting
that there is no substantial difference in cognitive efficiency between boys and girls. Thus, Hypothesis 3 is
accepted. Although girls showed a slightly higher mean score (M = 73.31) than boys (M = 71.05), the
difference did not reach statistical significance. This finding implies that both genders possess comparable
levels of attention control, working memory, and processing ability during late adolescence. It also indicates
that cognitive efficiency is more strongly influenced by mindfulness and environmental factors (e.g., academic
demands, stress levels) rather than by gender. This outcome resonates with Chiesa & Serretti (2021), who
observed that mindfulness-related cognitive gains occur universally across gender groups. It also supports
Verma & Mehta (2022), who found negligible gender variation in cognitive flexibility among secondary
students after mindfulness-based interventions.
DISCUSSION
The study overall conclusion support the notion that among higher secondary students mindfulness and
cognitive efficiency are substantially associated. Superior cognitive functioning is demonstrated by adolescents
who retain present moment awareness nonjudgmental attention and emotional management. The findings
support the theory that mindfulness improves working memory inhibitory control attention regulation and
other executive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex (Tang et.al. 2018; Chiesa & Serretti, 2021). These
results emphasize the significant of integrating mindfulness based educational programs into school curriculum
from a pedagogical perspective. Students attention focus and cognitive endurance can be develop through
technique including body scan exercises guided meditation and mindful breathing. Even brief mindfulness
training results in quantifiable improvements in brain efficiency and performance outcomes according to the
research by Zeidan et.al. (2020).
Mindfulness is a useful strategy to improve learning effectiveness and mental health in the Indian school
setting where rote leering and test stress are common. In the line with the current study finding that
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 746
www.rsisinternational.org
mindfulness promotes greater cognitive efficiency (Kumar & Rani, 2020) discovered that mindful learner’s
exhibit improved meta-cognitive regulation.
Additionally gender study showed that while cognitive efficiency remained mostly gender neutral girls tends to
exhibit higher level of mindfulness perhaps as a result of their greater emotional expressiveness and
introspection. This support can notion that when successfully incorporated into educational setting mindfulness
therapies can help all students regardless.
Educational Implication
The study conclusion has a number of useful ramifications for the field of education especially in terms of
improving higher secondary students’ cognitive abilities and general wellbeing.
The possibility of integrating mindfulness exercises into regular school schedules is one of the main
ramifications. At the start or end of classes school may use brief mindfulness exercises including body
scans mindful breathing technique or 8 to 10 minutes of guided meditation. In line with the found
favorable relationship between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency such exercises can assist students
in controlling their attention lowering mental tiredness and develop a reflective mentality.
The preparation of teacher is another significant issue. Teacher can receive training in mindfulness
based classroom management strategies that prioritize stress education emotional awareness and
patience. Teacher who processes these abilities can provide an example of mindful behavior fostering a
focused and peaceful learning.
Higher secondary students face serious difficulties with academic stress and performance anxiety
particularly during board exams. Stress can be reduce emotional control can be enhance and intrinsic
motivation can be raised by putting mindfulness interventions into practices.
The study emphasizes how mindfulness might improve executive skills like working memory attention and
cognitive flexibility. To improve meta-cognitive awareness and processing accuracy educators might promote
mindfulness program and attention exercises and reflection activities.
CONCLUSION
The present study investigated the relationship between mindfulness and cognitive efficiency among higher
secondary students. The results demonstrated a significant positive correlation, indicating that students with
higher mindfulness levels exhibit better attention span, working memory, processing speed, and emotional
regulation. This finding highlights the importance of mindfulness as a cognitive enhancer that directly supports
academic performance and overall psychological functioning. Furthermore, the study revealed gender
differences in mindfulness, with girls scoring slightly higher than boys, while cognitive efficiency remained
relatively similar across genders. This suggests that while mindfulness practices may be particularly beneficial
in addressing attention and emotional differences, cognitive efficiency improvements are broadly applicable to
all students. These results highlight the importance of incorporating mindfulness-based interventions into
curriculum, teacher preparation programs, and school routines from an educational standpoint. Schools can
establish learning environments that enhance cognitive performance and foster emotional and behavioral
development by implementing techniques like brief guided meditation sessions, reflective activities, and
mindful breathing exercises. Lastly, the study's cross-sectional design limits it even though it finds a
substantial correlation. To investigate causal linkages and the long-term impacts of mindfulness training on
cognitive efficiency, future studies may use experimental or longitudinal approaches.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author expresses sincere gratitude for the financial support received from the Alagappa University
Research Fund (AURF) - Seed Money Project, which facilitated the conduct of this research.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 747
www.rsisinternational.org
REFERENCES
1. Baer, R. A. (2019). Mindfulness and psychological well-being: Theory, research, and practice.
Guilford Press.
2. Banerjee, S., & Dutta, R. (2024). Mindfulness and cognitive performance among board exam
students: A psychological perspective. Indian Journal of Education and Psychology, 18(1), 4558.
3. A. Fazila Begam, Dr. R. Portia and A. Elavarasi., (2025). Fostering Resilience: Mindfulness-Based
Interventions to Alleviate Anxiety in Higher Secondary Students, International Journal of Emerging
Knowledge Studies. 4(1), pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-12-032
4. A. Fazila Begam and Dr. R. Portia., (2023). Impact of Mindfulness Practices on the ProblemSolving
Abilities among B.Ed. Student Teachers: A Thematic Study, International Journal of Emerging
Knowledge Studies. 2(11), pp.628-631. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-02-11-060
5. Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child
Development, 81(6), 16411660.
6. Bhasin, H., & Sharma, P. (2020). Academic stress and emotional regulation among adolescents.
Indian Journal of Psychological Studies, 27(3), 122130.
7. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230241.
8. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in
psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822848.
9. Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2021). Mindfulness-based approaches: Cognitive benefits and neural
mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 667678.
10. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135168.
11. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive
performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336353.
12. Gupta, R., & Nair, S. (2023). Mindfulness and academic resilience among higher secondary students.
Journal of Indian Educational Psychology, 12(3), 8596.
13. Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., et al. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work?
Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 6(6), 537559.
14. Jha, A. P., Morrison, A. B., & Dreyfuss, M. (2019). Mindfulness training improves cognitive
resilience. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(4), 11231134.
15. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life.
Hyperion.
16. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 4770.
17. Kaur, R., & Kaur, M. (2020). Academic stress and coping mechanisms among adolescents. Indian
Journal of Education, 45(2), 89102.
18. Kumar, R., & Rani, S. (2020). Mindfulness and meta cognitive awareness among Indian adolescents.
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(2), 176182.
19. Lin, Y., Chang, S., & Huang, T. (2021). Mindfulness, academic self-efficacy, and cognitive
performance among Taiwanese high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 132
148.
20. Meiklejohn, J., Phillips, C., Freedman, M. L., et al. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K12
education: Fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3(4), 291307.
21. Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Tarchin Phillips, D., et al. (2013). Mindfulness training improves
working memory capacity and GRE performance. Psychological Science, 24(5), 776781.
22. Patil, S., & Shinde, M. (2021). Effects of mindfulness meditation on working memory and
concentration. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 9(3), 4045.
23. Rao, K. R. (2016). Indian psychology and the science of mindfulness. Psychology and Developing
Societies, 28(2), 203229.
24. Roca, M., García, A., & Fernández, J. (2022). Mindfulness and neural efficiency in adolescents: A
cognitive neuroscience approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(6), 10221033.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
Page 748
www.rsisinternational.org
25. Roeser, R. W., Skinner, E., Beers, J., & Jennings, P. A. (2013). Mindfulness training and teachers’
professional development. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 167173.
26. Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lawlor, M. S. (2010). The effects of a mindfulness-based education
program on pre- and early adolescents’ well-being. Mindfulness, 1(3), 137151.
27. Sharma, P., & Singh, V. (2019). Mindfulness practice and academic engagement among adolescents.
International Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 134142.
28. Steinberg, L. (2017). Adolescence (11th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
29. Tang, Y. Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2018). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(4), 211222.
30. Thompson, L., & Gauntlett-Gilbert, J. (2023). Mindfulness and cognitive efficiency in adolescents: A
longitudinal intervention study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 228244.
31. Verma, K., & Mehta, D. (2022). Mindfulness-based yoga and cognitive flexibility in secondary
students. Journal of Indian Education, 47(1), 4556.
32. Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., & Goolkasian, P. (2020). Mindfulness meditation improves cognitive
flexibility and reduces stress. Consciousness and Cognition, 85, 103117.
33. Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools
a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603.