the Eastern Visayas Medical Center (EVMC). Despite intensified donation campaigns, hospitals reported
critical shortages (Leyte Samar Daily News, 2024), forcing families of patients to take on the burden of
searching for blood supplies themselves, often traveling across multiple facilities without guarantee of
availability.
This situation highlights an often-overlooked dimension of healthcare logistics: the socio-economic burden
placed on patients’ families. When shortages occur, hospitals often require relatives to secure replacement
donations or locate blood units from other institutions. Without centralized information systems, families
resort to physically visiting different blood banks across Tacloban City, a process that is time-consuming,
resource-draining, and psychologically taxing. For families already under stress due to medical emergencies,
this additional burden translates to wasted effort, time, and money, potentially exacerbating health inequities
(Raykar et al., 2021).
Consider a typical scenario: a relative of a patient requiring an urgent transfusion starts at EVMC, the primary
referral hospital in the region. After being informed that the blood type is unavailable, the relative must visit
other facilities such as the Philippine Red Cross, Divine Word Hospital, or Mother of Mercy Hospital. Each
trip entails transportation costs, waiting times, and uncertainty. If the relative travels inefficiently—
backtracking across distant hospitals or missing nearby facilities—they may spend hours and significant
financial resources without securing the needed blood. In critical cases, this inefficiency can be life-
threatening. Thus, the problem is not solely one of supply shortage but also of access optimization and
resource allocation.
This study proposes that mathematical optimization, specifically through the Traveling Salesman Problem
(TSP), offers a systematic approach to reducing wasted resources in this context. The TSP is one of the most
well-known NP-hard problems in combinatorial optimization, asking: given a set of locations and pairwise
distances, what is the shortest possible route that visits each location exactly once and returns to the starting
point? It has been widely applied in logistics, manufacturing, and healthcare, including ambulance routing,
vaccination distribution, and patient scheduling (Liu et al., 2022). Recent advancements in heuristic
algorithms, such as those applied in home care scheduling and blood supply chain management, demonstrate
the potential for TSP-based solutions to address real-world logistics challenges (Teng et al., 2022). For
instance, studies have shown that heuristic algorithms can optimize routes for healthcare workers serving
patients in dispersed locations, reducing travel time and costs while improving service delivery (Pop, 2024).
The appeal of using the TSP in Tacloban’s blood bank network lies in its ability to model the search process of
families. Each hospital with a blood bank can be represented as a "node," and the travel distance, time, or fare
between hospitals serves as the "weight" of the connecting edge. Solving the TSP allows for the identification
of routes that minimize the total burden of visiting all potential facilities. While families may not need to visit
all hospitals in practice, the principle of route minimization ensures that any truncated journey follows an
efficient sequence, making the model highly applicable to real-time decision-making.
Various methods exist for solving the TSP. Exact algorithms like Branch-and-Bound (Little et al., 1963) and
Cutting Plane approaches (Dantzig et al., 1954) guarantee optimality but are computationally demanding for
real-time applications. Metaheuristics such as Genetic Algorithms (Holland, 1992) and Ant Colony
Optimization (Dorigo & Gambardella, 1997) provide near-optimal solutions but require specialized
implementation resources (Teng et al., 2022). In contrast, the Greedy Algorithm offers a balance of simplicity
and utility, making it suitable for resource-constrained settings. The Greedy Algorithm follows a
straightforward nearest-neighbor strategy, selecting the closest unvisited location at each step until all are
visited (Cormen et al., 2009). Although it does not guarantee global optimality, it often produces near-optimal
solutions for small networks and aligns with human decision-making under stress (Pop., 2024).
One critical advantage of the Greedy Algorithm in this context is its flexibility for route truncation. Since each
step selects the nearest unvisited hospital, families can stop the route at any point once blood is secured,
confident that the sequence was efficient up to that point. This property distinguishes it from other heuristics
that may require complete route execution for efficiency. Moreover, the algorithm’s simplicity allows for easy
integration into mobile applications or printed guides, providing practical solutions for families in crisis.