INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1555
www.rsisinternational.org
Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in
Borgu Local Government Area
Mukaila
1
O. O*, Abdulraman
2
S. O, Ayuba
3
A.B & Jimoh I
4
1
Haleem Educational Centre, New Bussa, Niger State. Nigeria
2
Department of Material Science and Engineering Kwara State University, Malete, Ilorin Nigeria
3
Department of Product Development and Engineering, National Institute for Freshwater Fisheries
Research, New Bussa, Niger State Nigeria
4
Works Department, Moro Local Government Bode Saadu, Kwara State


ABSRACT
This study was conducted to assess the environmental impact of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Borgu
Local Government Area, Niger State, located in North Central Nigeria. Samples were gathered from areas
presumed free of gold mining activities to serve as controls, as well as from gold processing (washing) sites and
downstream locations along Mayera water. These samples were analysed at the National Institute for Freshwater
Fisheries Research (NIFFR) central laboratory for heavy metals using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).
The levels of cadmium, copper, chromium, iron, lead, and mercury were measured using AAS techniques. The
concentrations found in samples from the control site (upstream) are cadmium (0.001mg/L) copper (0.006mg/l),
chromium (0.025mg/l), iron (.01mg/l) lead (0.009mg/l) and mercury (.0088mg/l) are all below the acceptable
permissible limit of WHO/NAFDAC. While the result from the mining processing (washing) site show a very
high increase in the heavy metal concentration of cadmium (0.008mg/L) copper (0.032mg/l), chromium
(0.091mg/l), iron (0.447mg/l) lead (0.032mg/l) and mercury (0.031mg/l).the mean concentration of cadmium
are (0.0.0058mg/l),chromium(0.027mg/l) and iron (0.1624) on(0.1624mg/l) are below the acceptable
permissible limit of NAFDAC while copper(0.02mg/l),lead(0.0257mg/l) and mercury(0.0267mg/l)are above the
acceptable permissible limit of NAFDAC. Cadmium (0.0.0058mg/l), copper (0.02mg/l), chromium (0.027mg/l)
and iron (0.1624) are below WHO limit while, lead (0.0257mg/l) and mercury (0.0267mg/l)/l) are above the
acceptable permissible limit of WHO. The result shows heavy metal concentration due to artisanal and small-
scale mining activities in the Borgu local government which is the most silent but significant environmental side
effect.
Keywords: Gold mining, Artisanal, heavy metals, Lead poisoning.
INTRODUCTION
Money comes from artisanal and small-scale mining operations, a broad categorization that ranges from
subsistence miners with shovel and gold pan to small outfit equipped with basic machinery.
The practice, which provides a livelihood for an estimated 100million people directly and indirectly, also comes
at a cost: large-scale deforestation, air and water contamination and chronic human diseases, particularly from
mercury used to process the gold ore.
Artisanal and small-scale mining is the no.1anthropogenic cause of mercury pollution in the world and major
sources of fund to finance the activities of bandits and terrorists in Africa especially Nigeria.
Mining activities, including prospecting, exploration, construction, operation, maintenance, expansion,
abandonment, decommissioning and repurposing of a mine can impact social and environmental systems in a
range of positive and negative, and direct and indirect ways. Mining can yield a range of benefits to societies,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1556
www.rsisinternational.org
but it may also cause conflict, not least in relation to above ground and sub-surface land use. Similarly, mining
can alter environments, but remediation and mitigation can restore systems. The activities affected both social
and environmental systems. Native ecosystems and aboriginal human communities are typically affected by
multiple stressors, including climate change and pollution, for example.
Borgu LGA is located in Niger Sate and the Au mines of Borgu are located mostly in the communities of Popo-
Kere, Koro, Daban Oli and Daban Fura. Extraction of the Au ore under artisanal mining in Borgu area is an
extremely strenuous and hazardous activity. Prospective Au mines are usually located based on intuition and
experience. Mining of Au is Mining of gold has being left in the hands of artisanal miners who do not have
enough resources and adequate equipment and technology required for the mining activities.
Borgu and its environment as a major gold field suffer in the hands of artisanal miners particularly in New Bussa.
This work therefore will be studying the environmental problems associated with artisanal gold mining in new
bussa using both physical observations and laboratory analysis of samples.
Artisanal mining broadly refers to mining by individuals, groups, families or cooperatives with minimal
mechanization, often in the informal sector of the market. Artisanal gold mining is carried out in developing
countries of Africa, Oceania and Central and South America. According to Hentschel et al. (2002), globally the
number of people estimated to be involved in this activity is 80100 million people. Africa produces more than
60 metal and mineral products and is a major producer of several of the world’s most important minerals and
metals, including gold. Although underexplored, Africa hosts about 30% of the planet’s mineral reserves,
including 40% of gold, 60% of cobalt and 90% of the world’s precious gems and mineral reserves (Tieguhong
et al. 2009).According to the World Bank Group (2001
The process of mining also causes environmental destruction (land, soil, vegetation) leading to loss of forest
resources, wildlife habitat, and/or agricultural cropland (Tiffany, 2012).
Studies on the Environmental impacts of ASGM have not been extensively carried out in Borgu local government
area. The main environmental damage in this region is soil degradation, land damage and river pollution. Also,
the presence of several abandoned open pits scattered in areas of ancient or recent gold mining cause’s severe
disturbance of the land surface and disappearance of cultivable land and gallery forest (Joseph & Joseph, 2013).
Artisanal Gold Mining In Borgu
Borgu LGA is located in Niger Sate (Figure 1) and the Au mines of Borgu are located mostly in the communities
of Popo-Kere, Koro, Daban Oli and Daban Fura. Extraction of the Au ore under artisanal mining in Borgu area
is an extremely strenuous and hazardous activity. Prospective Au mines are usually located based on intuition
and experience. Mining of gold has being left in the hands of artisanal miners who do not have enough resources
and adequate equipment and technology required for the mining activities.
Borgu and its environment as a major gold field suffer in the hands of artisanal miners particularly in New Bussa.
This work therefore will be studying the environmental problems associated with artisanal gold mining in new
bussa using both physical observations and laboratory analysis of water samples.
Figure 1: Map of Borgu Local Government Area.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1557
www.rsisinternational.org
Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) are mining operations which are easily controlled technologically and
financially by under-equipped populations with limited means and exploited as individuals, families,
associations or cooperatives (Seydou, 2002). An estimated 20 million people around the world rely on ASGM
for livelihood, working in more than 80 countries. They produce some 10% of the world’s mined gold (The
World Bank, 2013).
Generally, there are two types of mining exploitation in NIG. The artisanal and the semi-mechanized mining.
The mining processes are basically the same for both but only differ in their degrees of mechanization in
artisanal mining, rudimentary tools like spades, shovels, pickaxes and crowbars are used, while the semi-
mechanized mining involves the use of heavy machines like excavators and bulldozers. However, both forms of
exploitation are classified as artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM).
Forms Of Mining Activities
Mining can be divided into three based on the processes involved in the extraction. Open Pit mining is the form
where material is excavated from an open pit; it is one of the most common forms of mining for strategic minerals
that are available in small deposits as shown in Figure 2 (Dontala et al. 2015). Underground Mining involves
large-scale movements of waste rock and vegetation. These two forms are believed to have the potential for
tunnel collapses and land subsidence (Betournay, 2011).In situ leach (ISL), mining which is done underground,
is believed to have environmental and safety advantages over the other two (World Nuclear Association, 2012)
because there is no ore dust or direct ore exposure to the environment and lower consumption of water is needed
in the mining process (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2005).
Figure 2: Gold processing (washing) pond.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Study Site
The area of the study, The Nasarawa-Kainji gold processing (washing) site and the adjoining Mayara River
which shared boundary with Borgu and Mashegu Local Government area Niger State Nigeria.
Sample Collection And Pre-Treatment
Samples were collected from 4 locations by dipping 1L white polyethylene plastic bottles into the source and
the river.
Bottles were previously washed thoroughly with detergents and deionized water and then soaked by filling with
20% dil HNO3 for 24hrs.Then the bottles were then washed with tap water and then with distilled deionized
water.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1558
www.rsisinternational.org
During collection of samples, bottles were rinsed properly with the river water samples and then the samples
were collected from the side of the riverbank, the washing pond, the discharge area and river source (no activities
area).
The collected samples were immediately carried to the National Institute of Fresh Water Fisheries Research
(NIFFR) Central Laboratory for AAS analysis.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Result Of Heavy Metals Content Of Borgu Local Govt. Asgm Processing Field And Mayera River
Table 4.1 present the results obtained after the analysis of the collected samples
Table 4.1 result of heavy metals analysis using BUCK 200 AAS (AOAC, 975.23).
S/N
O
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
CADMIUM
mg/L
CHROMI
UM mg/L
COPPER
mg/L
LEAD
mg/L
MERCURY
mg/L
1
SAMPLE1
0.0060
0.0240
0.0480
0.0240
0.0250
2
SAMPLE2
0.0034
0.0180
0.0620
0.0210
0.0230
3
SAMPLE3
0.0010
0.0060
0.0250
0.0090
0.0088
4
SAMPLE4
0.0080
0.0320
0.0910
0.0320
0.0320
7
NAFDAC
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0100
0.0500
DISCUSSION OF RESULT
Heavy metal concentration collected from different sampling site in artisanal and small scale gold processing
(washing) site in Borgu local government area and MAYERA RIVER using Atomic absorption spectrometer
(AAS) had been studied and analyzed. The graphs plotted are concentration (ppm) against elements for each
sampling point, concentration (ppm) for each element against sampling points and relationship between the
elements such as cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead and mercury.
Concentration Of Element For Each Sample Point
Figure 3: Concentration of element against sample one
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
Cadium copper chromium iron lead mecury
Series1
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1559
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 4: Concentration of element against sample two
Figure 5: Concentration of element against sample three
Figure 6: Concentration of element against sample four
Key
Sample1 river joining
Sample2 down stream
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Cadium copper chromium iron lead mecury
Series1
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
Cadium copper chromium iron lead mecury
Series1
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
Cadium copper chromium iron lead mecury
Series1
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1560
www.rsisinternational.org
Sample3 up stream
Sample4 point of mining (discharge)
Figure 7: Average concentration of heavy element.
Figure 3 show the concentration (ppm) of each trace element for lake site where gold processing discharge is
joining the MAYERA RIVER, the chart indicated that , all the trace element are below the acceptable permissible
limit standard control for USEPA of value
The element mercury, chromium and iron value are 0.025, 0.024 and 0.404 are above the acceptable permissible
of USEPA of values 0mg/l, 0mg/l and 0.3mg/l respectively. The element lead and mercury of value 0.024mg/l,
0.025mg/l are above acceptable permissible limit of WHO and NAFDAC.
Figure 4. Shows that the concentration of trace elements recorded for Downstream where lively activity take
place and the effect of impact of the contamination from gold mining will be felt. The element mercury, lead of
value 0.023mg/l and 0.021mg/l are above the acceptable permissible limit of WHO of value 0.01 and 0.001
respectively. The element mercury and chromium of value 0.023 and 0.018 respectively are above the acceptable
permissible limit of USEPA of value 0mg/l. the element copper, lead, mercury of value 0.062mg/l, 0.021mg/l
and 0.032mg/l respectively are above the acceptable permissible limit for NAFDAC.
Figure 5. Shows the concentration of the heavy element recorded for upstream where the activity of gold miners
has no effect (CONTROL SAMPLE) .it was observed that all elements are mostly below the acceptable
permissible limit of all the control standard USEPA, NAFDAC and WHO except mercury and chromium that
showed slightly difference for USEPA.
Figure 6. Shows the concentration of trace element recorded for point of processing (washing) of Gold. The
element mercury of value 0.032mg/l is above the acceptable limit of all the standard control organizations
WHO/NAFDAC and USEPA of value 0.001mg/l and 0mg/l respectively while lead is above WHO /NAFDAC
and USEPA 0.001mg/l and 0mg/l respectively. While lead is above WHO limit. The elements of copper, lead,
mercury and iron of value 0.091, 0.032, 0.031 and 0.447 are above the acceptable permissible limit of NAFDAC
of value 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and 0.3 respectively. Table 4.2 and 4.3 shows the comparison between heavy metal
with different standards
Table 4.2: Comparisons between the averages measured heavy metal with the maximum permissible limit set by
NAFDAC
ELEMENT
AVERAGE CONC. (mg/L)
MAX.PERMISSIBLE CONC. (mg/L) NAFDAC
REMARK
CADMIUM
0.0058
0.0500
BPL
COPPER
0.0526
0.0500
APL
cadmium
2%
copper
18%
chromium
8%
iron
54%
lead
9%
mercury
9%
AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
OF HEAVY ELEMENT
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1561
www.rsisinternational.org
CHROMIUM
0.0247
0.0500
BPL
IRON
0.1624
0.3000
BPL
LEAD
0.0257
0.0100
APL
MERCURY
0.0267
0.0010
APL
Table 4.3: Comparison between the averages measured heavy metal with the maximum permissible limit set
by WHO
ELEMENT
AVERAGE CONC. (mg/L)
MAX.PERMISSIBLE CONC. . . . (mg/L)
WHO
REMARK
CADMIUM
0.0058
0.0500
BPL
COPPER
0.0526
1.5000
BPL
CHROMIUM
0.0247
0.0500
BPL
IRON
0.1624
1.0000
BPL
LEAD
0.0257
0.0100
APL
MERCURY
0.0267
0.0010
APL
An excess mercury Hg was obtained in all the sample point indicating that it has exceeded the guidelines
recommended by united state environmental protection agency. USEPA. World Health Organization WHO and
National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control. NAFDAC. Also lead exceeded the
recommended limit of WHO and NAFDAC. Chromium with average conc. of 0.0247mg/l exceeded the
recommended acceptable permissible limit of 0mg/l.
CONCLUSION
Artisanal and small scale gold mining are activity that employs many people in rural area because the barriers
to entry are minimal, with low technology, capital; and limited skills needed. From the study of the
environmental impact of artisanal and small-scale mining in Borgu local government area Niger state Nigeria
the result showed that the activities of artisanal gold miners had increase the level of heavy element by
cadmium(21%) copper (15%), chromium (23.5%), iron (30.65%) lead (19.3%) and mercury (20.29%).heavy
metal contamination due to gold mining and processing (washing) has become one of the most silent but
significant environment side effect.it is an activity associated with many negative social impacts, miners are
exposed to chemical contaminants, unsanitary conditions, prostitution, alcoholism and drug addiction. Women
and children are generally the most affected by these hazard.it is also associated with a number of environmental
impact which are deforestation and land degradation, open pits which pose as animal traps and health hazards
and mercury pollution, dust and noise pollution.
However, gold mining operation also have positive impact on the environment if sustainable and modern method
are adopted. Considering that gold mining activities in Nigeria are operating below capacity, efforts should be
made to review the law and enforce them to minimize casualties.
Artisanal and small scale gold mining (ASGM) activity needs to be encouraged to reduce the rate of youth
unemployment in Nigeria but there is also the need to greatly re organized the trade, educate the miner and
provide technical /improved technology on site with adequate security to checkmate all forms of anti-social
behavior on mining site.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue VIII August 2025
Page 1562
www.rsisinternational.org
The environmental impacts of artisanal gold mining in Borgu local government area are still on a small-scale
but a potential danger in the nearest future if the practice continues without concise action to mitigate the effect.
It is observed that if appropriate action is not taken to control the activities of open mining by artisanal manners,
the effects will be on agriculture, fisheries, and public health .
REFERENCES
1. Adesoji O.H (2014). Assessing the environmental impact of inland sand mining in parts of Ogun state
Nigeria Ethiopian journal of environment studies and management.
2. Afolayan D. O (2021)Safe mining assessment of artisanal barite mining activities in Nigeria Mining
2021, 1, 224-240 https://doi.org/10.3390/mining1020015 MDPI.
3. Ako T.A, Onoduku, U, S.,Oke S.A., ADAMU A., Ali S.E. and Ibrahim A.T. (2014). Environmental
impact of artisanal gold mining in Luka , Minna Niger state north central Nigeria Journal of geoscience
and geometrics vol 2 no 1 28-37 http:/pubs.sciepub.com. Environmental law institute (2014)
4. Ahmed F Ali ETAL, (2018). Environmental issues and the prospects of mining in Nigeria Dutse Journal
of pure and Applied Science (DUJOPAS) VOL 4 NO 2
5. Awomeso J.A etal (2017). Human health and environmental assessments of small-scale and artisanal
mining activities in the Gold city of Ijesha Land, Southwestern Nigeria. Environmental system research
DOI 10.1186/s40068-017-0095-4
6. Hentschel R & hruschka F (2002). Global report on artisanal and small-scale mining international labour
organization London: IIED and WBCSD MMSD
7. Kelvin N Funoh (2014). The impact of artisanal gold mining on local livelihoods and the environment
in the forested area of Cameroon. Center for international forestry research
8. Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF). Nigeria country security and safety plan-draft1, May 2010.
9. Muibat O. F (2016). heavy metal pollution from gold mines: environmental effects and bacterial
strategies for resistance. International journal of environmental research and public health MPDI.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
10. Mustafa Ibrahim Alhaji, Ezeamaka Cyril Kanayochukwu (2020). Spatial location of artisanal mining
activities in Niger state and its implication to the environment international journal of engineering applied
sciences and technology vol.5 issue1 page 711-719
11. Nnaji JC Omotugba S K (2016). Risk of toxic metal contamination in gold mining and processing area
of Borgu and Mashegu local government area of Niger state, Nigeria International research journal of
chemistry and chemical science vol 3(1) pp 033-036
12. Tieguhong J.C Ingram V.and Schue J . (2009). Impact of artisanal gold mining om livelihoods and the
environment in the sangba tri national park (TNS) land scape, Congo basin Yaoundé Cameroon, CIFOR
13. Viaga M.M. (2013). Mercury in artisanal gold mining in Latin America: facts, fantasies and solutions,
UNIDO Expert Group Meeting-introducing new technologies for abatement of global
mercurypollution deriving from artisanal gold mining, Vienna Austria.
14. WHO (2016). Technical paper #1: Environmental and occupational health hazards associated with
artisanal and small-scale gold mining. http://www.who.int.