User's Perceptions of Libraries Physical Infrastructure Facilities in
United Arab Emirates and India: A Comparative Study
Dr Harish R
1
, Rakshith M R
2
, Chandan B
3
1
Librarian, Sri K Puttaswamy First Grade College, Mysore, India
2,3
Assistant Librarian, Maharaja institute of Technology Mysore, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800178
Received: 04 Sep 2025; Accepted: 10 Sep 2025; Published: 18 September 2025
ABSTRACT
This study presents a comparative analysis of the physical infrastructure of university libraries in India and the
United Arab Emirates, focusing on user satisfaction in reference sections. Data were collected through
structured questionnaires at Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), India, and the University of
Wollongong in Dubai (UOWD). Findings reveal that users at UOWD report higher satisfaction levels
compared to VTU. Key areas of satisfaction include seating (89.7%), study spaces (81.4%), welcoming
environment (87.2%), seminar rooms, Wi-Fi (82.7%), power outlets (85.1%), and lighting (89.0%). Overall,
users expressed positive views on the libraries' physical infrastructure.
Keywords: Physical Infrastructure, Library Facilities, Comparative Study, Universities, UAE, India
INTRODUCTION
This study compares the physical infrastructure of reference sections in university libraries in India and the
UAE. Both libraries offer quality facilities such as seating, study areas, seminar rooms, lighting, and Wi-Fi.
The physical environment is essential to academic libraries as it influences learning, research, and user
satisfaction. Guided by the LibQUAL framework, libraries are seen as dynamic spaces for knowledge
generation, preservation, and access. As social institutions, libraries fulfill the human need for shared learning
spaces. Upgrades in physical infrastructure have been linked to increased usage and improved service delivery.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Downs (1965) noted that many libraries lack adequate resources, facilities, and staff, affecting service quality.
The reputation of a university is closely tied to the quality of its library infrastructure (Ogbuiyi & Okpe, 2013).
Essential components include power supply, ICT tools, furniture, and purpose-built buildings (Omeluzor,
2018). Facilities such as seating, toilets, catalog systems, lighting, and ventilation also enhance usability
(Iwhiwhu & Okorodudu, 2012). Library effectiveness depends on the availability and functionality of its
infrastructure (Omeluzor et al., 2018), which also supports long-term sustainability. Nitecki (2011) emphasized
that a library’s design and services must align with its intended function.
Objective
Library as a social institution is a reflection of an urge inherent in human beings to record and preserve for
wider dissemination of new knowledge acquired through observation, discussion, experimentation and deep
thinking. The ongoing search throughout the history in the adoption of new medium for recording knowledge is
an indication of desire in mankind to find a medium which is capable of survival and at the same time which
could reach a wider public expeditiously. An equally if not more important need was to put these records at a
place where it was accessible to people. The place now called library has thus played a significant role in
generation, preservation and in dissemination of new knowledge Library as a social institution is a reflection of
an urge inherent in human beings to record and preserve for wider dissemination of new knowledge acquired
through observation, discussion, experimentation and deep thinking. The ongoing search throughout the history in