gang-aligned, and illegal economy-driven prison subcultures to thrive unchecked. Upon release, ex-inmates
encounter a society suspicious of their reform: background checks block employment, families struggle with
stigma-induced alienation, and halfway homes or organised re-entry help are essentially non-existent
(Chikadzi, 2017). Many inevitably return to crime, seeking acceptability and a living in illegal networks that
the legitimate economy does not provide. Only three (3) of every ten (10) Nigerians who are remanded in jail
often emerge completely rehabilitated, according to a United Nations assessment (UN, 2016). Although
Nigeria's Administration of Criminal Justice Act encourages restorative justice and requires speedy trials, its
implementation is uneven, and sentencing courts continue to default to incarceration for minor, non-violent
offences, further entrenching the cycle of legislative inertia (Augusta et al., 2025). Fundamentally, the prisons'
inability to provide meaningful rehabilitation or credible deterrence, caused by overcrowding, underfunding, a
lack of staff, and poor post-release support, turns them into havens for more complex criminal activity,
exacerbating rather than resolving the issue they were intended to address and guaranteeing that recidivism
will continue to be a persistent aspect of Nigerian society.
The most populous nation in Africa, Nigeria, has its share of recidivism problems. Nigeria's socioeconomic
progress is seriously threatened by recidivism, which is the propensity of people who have served time in jail
to commit crimes again and wind themselves up behind bars. High rates of recidivism in the country can be
traced to systemic failures such as poor rehabilitation programs, overcrowded and underfunded correctional
facilities, limited post-incarceration support, and societal stigmatization of ex-offenders (Ikoh, 2011; Ashibi &
Adams, 2023; Augusta et al., 2025). Due to these circumstances, many ex-offenders are forced back into crime
as a way of surviving and are unable to successfully reintegrate into society. Economically speaking, the
expense of housing repeat offenders puts a strain on the national budget, taking money away from vital areas
like infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Socially, a high recidivism rate damages family units and erodes
public confidence in the criminal justice system, particularly in low-income areas where crime is
disproportionately prevalent (Ike et al., 2023; Matulis, 2024). Further exacerbating social dislocation and
marginalisation is the psychological and emotional toll on families and communities. From the standpoint of
development, sustained recidivism hinders attempts to attain sustainable growth and long-term stability. It
keeps the cycle going, where poverty leads to crime, which then exacerbates poverty and insecurity.
Bayelsa State's facilities reflect the country's problems in a condensed, resource-constrained microcosm, and
the state is not especially exempt from the problems plaguing the Nigerian Prison Service. Because so many
formerly jailed repeat offenders still commit crimes, there is a serious lack of effective rehabilitation programs.
As a result of extended pre-trial detention, insufficient court sessions, and a lack of viable non-custodial
alternatives, the Okaka Correctional Centre struggles with extreme congestion, forcing remand detainees to
linger well beyond the legal limitations. With nearly 700 detainees—including those awaiting trial and those
convicted—the institution, which was built to accommodate 300 convicts, is presently experiencing acute
overcrowding, according to Tayese (2024). Basic human dignity is undermined within these crowded walls by
deteriorating infrastructure, sporadic electricity, and a lack of drinkable water, while overworked medical
personnel fight to prevent infectious illnesses like scabies and TB. During a federal investigation at Okaka
Correctional Centre, several unethical practices were found, including money transfers between staff and
prisoners, illicit drug sales, office misuse, and prisoners using mobile phones without authorisation (Tayese,
2024). Rehabilitation programs like literacy classes, vocational workshops, and psychosocial counselling
largely exist on paper due to chronic underfunding, a lack of qualified instructors, and unstable supply chains.
Correctional personnel, who are frequently selected on short rotations from other southern commands, deal
with low morale, little opportunity for professional advancement, and insufficient security equipment—all of
which encourage corruption and collusion in the illegal trade (Abeku, 2025). After being released from prison,
ex-offenders face the Niger Delta's precarious economy, high rates of young unemployment, and loss of
livelihood due to oil pollution. These conditions, together with widespread stigma, increase the risk of
reoffending. As a result, the Okaka prisons, like others around the country, serve more as holding depots that
unintentionally prolong rather than end criminal trajectories than as centres of correction.
It is pertinent to note that several literatures which directly or indirectly concern the Nigerian prisons have
been in existence hitherto this research. For instance, using primary data from a qualitative study, Chikadzi
(2017) discussed the challenges faced by ex-offenders when reintegrating into mainstream society in Gauteng,