INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2628
Impact of Flexibility on Working Drawing and Specification in the
Nigerian Construction Industry
*OLAYODE Daniel J., SOUNYO Ayebanengiyefa E., OKON Grace R., ADEWUMI Bamidele J.,
OGUNNAIKE Adekunle O.
Department of Architecture, College of Environmental Science and Management, Caleb University,
Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800231
Received: 18 Aug 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025; Published: 25 September 2025
ABSTRACT
The Nigerian construction industry continues to face significant challenges, particularly in the areas of project
delays, cost overruns, and miscommunication among stakeholders. A major contributor to these issues is the
prevalence of rigid and often unclear working drawings and specifications, which hinder effective
collaboration and limit the flexibility needed to address unforeseen site conditions or design changes. This
study investigates how adopting more flexible documentation approaches, supported by advanced digital tools
such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), can enhance project delivery, improve quality outcomes, and
strengthen coordination across multidisciplinary teams.
By employing a mixed-method approachdrawing on case studies from construction projects in Lagos and
survey data collected from industry professionalsthis research provides an in-depth analysis of the root
causes of documentation-related inefficiencies. The findings underscore the urgent need for adaptable practices
that reflect the complex realities of the Nigerian construction environment, where infrastructural constraints,
regulatory gaps, and varying levels of technical capacity often complicate project execution.
In response to these challenges, the study recommends the strategic integration of digital technologies to
streamline information flow, the implementation of targeted professional training programs to build
competency in modern documentation practices, and stronger regulatory enforcement to ensure compliance
with industry standards. Together, these measures aim to foster a more responsive and efficient construction
process, ultimately contributing to the timely and successful delivery of projects within Nigeria’s rapidly
growing built environment.
Keywords: Flexibility, Project management, Quality assurance, Building Information Modeling (BIM),
Specifications.
INTRODUCTION
The construction industry in Nigeria plays a vital role in supporting urban expansion and infrastructure
development, particularly in major cities like Lagos. (Oru, Adewumi&Asaju,2024; Adewumi, Asaju &
Adegbile, 2023) Despite its importance to national progress, the sector suffers from persistent documentation-
related challenges (Emesiobi, Otuonuyo, Adewumi, Asaju, & Onamade, 2024). However, the rigidity and
limited adaptability of working drawings and specifications have remained a central concern (Alugbue,
Otuonuyo, Adewumi, Onamade, & Asaju, 2024). These documents are critical tools for communicating design
intent, supporting project coordination, and ensuring quality control, yet they are often treated as static
deliverables rather than responsive instruments that can evolve with site realities (Owolabi, Harry, Adewumi,
Onamade, & Alagbe,2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2629
Working drawings typically illustrate the design and technical components of a project, while specifications
provide detailed written descriptions of materials, standards, and workmanship
expectations(Adewumi,Onamade, David-Mukoro,Bamiloye, Otuonuyo, Chukwuka, & Oru,2025). In practice,
these documents serve as contractual tools and reference guides throughout the lifecycle of a construction
project. However, in the Nigerian context, they are frequently underutilized or poorly integrated, leading to
miscommunication, errors, and delays in execution(Hassan,Adewumi&Olukunga,2024). Infrastructural
projects in Lagos, such as the Lagos Light Rail and Eko Tower Complex, have experienced setbacks due to
insufficient documentation updates and poor alignment between design information and on-site conditions
(Owolabi et al., 2024; Emesiobi et al., 2024).
The impact of such rigid documentation practices is most pronounced in fast-paced and high-density urban
areas like Lagos, where rapid decision-making and real-time coordination are essential for successful project
delivery (Adewumi, Asaju, Bello, Atulegwu, Ibhafidon, David-Mukoro, Otuonuyo, & Ogunyemi, 2025).
Professionals often resort to issuing verbal instructions or hand-sketched site revisions because the original
documents lack the flexibility to accommodate evolving project demands. These informal methods create
inconsistencies, reduce accountability, and contribute to construction waste, cost overruns, and rework
(Adewumi, Onamade, Oniyikelu, Otuonuyo, Alagbe, Adegbile, & Dayomi, 2025).
Internationally, flexibility in construction documentation has become a central principle in modern project
delivery. Countries like South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United Arab Emirates have adopted
integrated systems that treat specifications and drawings as living documents. These systems often rely on
digital platforms such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), which allow real-time updates and automatic
synchronization across design, procurement, and implementation teams (Leygonie, Motamedi, & Iordanova,
2022). Through the use of parametric tools and cloud-based platforms, global construction environments have
seen improvements in documentation accuracy, stakeholder coordination, and risk management.
However, most Nigerian professionals still rely on traditional documentation methods, often limited to printed
drawings and specifications developed early in the design phase. These documents are rarely updated after
design approval and are seldom reviewed collaboratively once construction begins. The gap between evolving
project realities and static documents often leads to communication breakdowns and quality issues, especially
where changes are necessary to address site constraints, budget limitations, or client feedback (Alugbue et
al,2024; Owolabi et al,2024)
Therefore given the complexity of modern construction and the dynamic nature of urban environments, there is
a critical need for more adaptive, collaborative, and technology-driven documentation systems
(Asaju,Adewumi,Onamade&Alagbe,2024). Moreover in this need, It requires both an understanding of the
current state of construction documentation in Nigeria and a comparison with international best practices. It
also calls for the identification of policy gaps, institutional barriers, and capacity limitations that hinder the
adoption of flexible documentation frameworks.
This study aims to examine the impact of flexibility in working drawings and specifications on project
performance in the Nigerian construction industry, with a focus on improving documentation practices to
enhance quality, cost control, and time efficiency in construction delivery. While the objectives are to assess
the current practices and limitations associated with the preparation and application of working drawings and
specifications in Nigerian construction projects; identify the challenges caused by rigid or static documentation
formats during the execution phase of construction; and evaluate the benefits of integrating flexibility into
working drawings and specifications, particularly in terms of improving communication, cost management,
and construction quality.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Concept of Flexibility in Construction Documentation
Leygonie, Motamedi, and Iordanova (2022) describe flexibility as a strategic design attribute that enhances
collaboration, minimizes waste, and improves responsiveness. When applied to construction documentation,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2630
flexibility enables teams to make adjustments without extensive delays or confusion. In developed contexts,
working drawings and specifications are no longer treated as final, fixed outputs. Instead, they are maintained
as dynamic tools that evolve alongside project needs.
In the context of the Nigerian construction industry, where site conditions frequently change and regulatory
procedures are often rigid, a lack of flexibility in documentation contributes to errors, disputes, and reduced
construction quality (Owolabi et al.2024). Therefore, understanding how flexibility applies specifically to
drawings and specifications is key to improving project performance across the country.
Role of Working Drawings and Specifications in Construction
Working drawings and specifications are fundamental tools for communication and coordination in any
construction project (Alagbue et al.2024). Working drawings are graphical illustrations that describe the
geometry, size, arrangement, and technical requirements of various building components. While the
specifications complement these drawings by detailing materials, workmanship standards, installation
methods, and compliance requirements (Emesiobi et al.2024; Adewumi et al.2025).
Therefore, these documents provide a shared reference point for architects, engineers, contractors, clients, and
regulatory bodies. When properly integrated, they reduce ambiguity and support better coordination between
disciplines (Owolabi et al,2024). However, when documentation is rigid, incomplete, or disconnected from site
realities, construction teams may resort to verbal instructions or informal sketches, increasing the likelihood of
error (Adewumi et al.2025).
In Nigeria, this disconnect is common. Many professionals produce drawings and specifications as separate
documents, rarely revising them once a project progresses into the construction phase. (Alagbe et al.2024)
observed that many projects rely on outdated specifications that no longer reflect the realities on site. In some
cases, the lack of updates leads to procurement mismatches, regulatory non-compliance, or the need for on-site
improvisation.
Global Best Practices and Nigerian Realities
International construction systems have embraced flexible design and documentation practices through early
stakeholder collaboration, use of digital tools, and iterative project delivery models. Countries like South
Korea and the United Kingdom utilize Building Information Modeling (BIM) and specification management
platforms to create living documents. These documents evolve as project demands shift, allowing for
continuous updates across architectural, structural, and services drawings (Leygonie et al., 2022).
Projects such as the Lagos Light Rail and the Second Niger Bridge illustrate this challenge. While certain
adjustments were made to specifications during construction, these changes were often informal and lacked
documentation traceability. Delays occurred partly due to the inability of project teams to revise working
drawings efficiently or incorporate changes from site investigations (Emesiobi et al., 2024).
Digital Tools Supporting Documentation Flexibility
Digital transformation has enabled new levels of flexibility in construction documentation. Tools such as BIM,
parametric modeling software, and automated specification platforms allow real-time collaboration and
dynamic revision of project documents. Parametric design tools, in particular, use variable inputs to generate
flexible geometries and technical details that adjust automatically to changes in requirements.
In Nigeria, however, adoption of such tools remains minimal. Most practitioners continue to use 2D drafting
tools or paper-based processes. According to Alagbe et al. (2024), only a small number of professionals
actively use BIM or parametric workflows. Factors limiting uptake include high software costs, lack of
training programs, and poor internet access in some regions.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2631
Parametric Design and Digital Technologies
Parametric design is a digital design approach that uses algorithms and variable parameters to generate
dynamic outputs. Unlike traditional static drawings, parametric models can be adjusted quickly by changing
input values such as dimensions, materials, or performance criteria. This allows architects and engineers to
produce flexible documentation that evolves in response to site conditions, client requirements, or regulatory
constraints.
It is important to note that parametric design is one among several digital tools that facilitate flexibility in
documentation. Building Information Modeling (BIM) enables multidisciplinary coordination and real-time
updates across drawings and specifications, while Common Data Environments (CDEs) provide cloud-based
platforms for version control and collaborative access. Together, these tools support an adaptive documentation
ecosystem that enhances accuracy, reduces delays, and improves decision-making in construction projects.
Research Gap
While there is considerable literature on construction documentation in Nigeria, very few studies focus
specifically on flexibility as a central factor influencing project performance. Most existing research
emphasizes the completeness or technical accuracy of working drawings and specifications but rarely explores
how rigid documentation impacts communication, coordination, or responsiveness during construction. There
is also limited investigation into how global digital tools, such as BIM and automated specification platforms,
can be adapted to Nigeria’s construction context, especially for small to medium-scale projects. Furthermore,
the role of regulatory systems in either enabling or restricting flexible documentation practices remains under-
researched. Another overlooked area is the collaborative aspect of documentation, as most local studies frame
it as the sole responsibility of architects rather than a shared task involving engineers, contractors, and clients.
These gaps highlight the need for further research into flexible, integrated, and context-specific approaches to
working drawings and specifications in the Nigerian construction industry.
METHODOLOGY
This study adopted a mixed-method approach, combining an extensive review of existing literature with the
analysis of survey data collected from professionals in the Nigerian construction industry. The literature review
covered academic journals, technical reports, and case studies published between 2020 and 2025, focusing on
documentation practices, project performance, and the integration of digital technologies in construction.
Special attention was given to documented Nigerian infrastructure projects, such as the Lagos Light Rail and
the Second Niger Bridge, which provided context for understanding the real-world implications of rigid
documentation practices.
The survey was designed to capture the perceptions and experiences of construction professionals from various
disciplines, including architects, engineers, contractors, and surveyors, representing different types of firms
and levels of experience. It explored key themes such as the flexibility of working drawings and specifications,
the use of digital tools like Building Information Modeling (BIM), parametric design, digital fabrication, and
virtual/augmented reality, as well as the perceived impact of these tools on project coordination and
documentation quality.
The collected data were organized and analyzed thematically to identify patterns and insights related to current
documentation practices and their limitations. This approach allowed the study to draw meaningful
connections between existing literature and the field data, ensuring that the findings reflect both global best
practices and the specific challenges faced in Nigeria. The methodology provided a foundation for critically
examining how flexible documentation frameworks could enhance collaboration, improve accuracy, and
support better project delivery in the Nigerian construction context.
The study involved a sample of 539 construction professionals who took part in the survey. This figure (N =
539) aligns with the demographic information provided in Chapter Four. Participants were sourced from
various professional roles within the construction sector, including architects (32.1%), contractors (14.3%),
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2632
engineers (11.3%), surveyors (14.1%), and other related fields. The variety of roles offers a well-rounded
perspective on the perception and application of flexibility in working drawings and specifications within the
industry. Additionally, secondary data sources such as journal articles, policy documents, and case studies were
incorporated. The Lagos Light Rail and the Eko Tower projects were deliberately chosen as case studies, as
they exemplify significant, high-profile developments in Lagos where challenges in documentation and the
necessity for flexibility became particularly apparent. Their magnitude, intricacy, and prominence render them
suitable benchmarks for assessing the effects of rigid versus adaptable documentation frameworks.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Interpretation of Flexibility in Working Drawings
Flexibility in working drawings refers to the ability of construction design documents to be adjusted,
revised, or restructured to reflect changing site conditions, client inputs, or evolving project requirements. In
contemporary construction practice, especially in digitally enabled environments, flexibility is not viewed as a
luxury, but as a critical determinant of project success. The responsiveness of working drawings can directly
influence construction efficiency, quality assurance, and alignment between the design and execution phases
(Leygonie et al., 2022).
Respondents’ Perceptions of Flexibility
The results show that most professionals acknowledge the flexibility advantages provided by parametric
design tools, especially in their ability to streamline modifications and enhance adaptability.
Table 1 respondents' perceptions of flexibility
S/N
Flexibility in Working
Drawings
Level of Agreement using the
Likert Scale
Total
(Ef)
Efx
Relative
Index
(RI)
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
1
Parametric design allows
for easy modifications to
working drawings.
64
82
160
133
100
539
1740
0.646
1
2
Working drawings can be
quickly adjusted using
parametric design tools.
76
87
98
179
99
539
1755
0.651
2
3
The flexibility offered by
parametric design improves
the design process.
69
73
152
127
118
539
1769
0.656
7
4
Parametric design enhances
the adaptability of working
drawings to changes.
75
66
115
137
146
539
1830
0.679
6
5
Working drawing created
with parametric design are
more adaptable to project
needs.
76
65
155
137
106
539
1749
0.032
6
While the average mean scores hover around 3.2 to 3.4, indicating moderate agreement, these responses
highlight a growing awareness among Nigerian professionals regarding the benefits of flexible documentation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2633
systems. However, the practical implementation of such flexibility remains constrained by infrastructural and
regulatory factors (Owolabi et al., 2024).
Accuracy and Precision in Working Drawings
Respondents linked digital fabrication with measurable improvements in drawing precision, echoing trends
in advanced economies where these technologies are central to modern documentation workflows.
Table 2 Precision statement
S/N
Precision Statement
Mean Score
Relative Index (RI)
Rank
1
More accurate drawings
3.29
0.659
1
2
Improved drawing detail
3.21
0.642
2
3
Fewer errors in digitally generated drawings
3.29
0.659
7
4
Increased precision using digital tech
3.49
0.698
6
5
Enables exact specifications
3.29
0.659
6
This supports the argument in Alagbe et al. (2024) that digital precision reduces rework, improves material
estimation, and increases client satisfaction, especially in complex builds like Eko Towers and Lagos Light
Rail.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This research explored how flexibility in working drawings and specifications affects the performance of
construction projects in Nigeria. From everything reviewed, one thing is clear: many of the inefficiencies
experienced during project execution are closely tied to how rigid and disconnected our documentation
systems have become.
Most working drawings and specifications used in Nigerian construction today are prepared as static, isolated
documents. Once completed and approved, they are rarely revisited or revised, even when unexpected changes
happen on site. This creates confusion, forces site teams to improvise, and often leads to mistakes that could
have been avoided. In fast-moving environments like Lagos, these issues become even more obvious.
Professionals end up relying on verbal adjustments or hand-drawn revisions, which only widen the gap
between design intent and actual construction.
Looking at how other countries manage documentation has shown that there are better approaches. In places
like South Korea and the UK, drawings and specifications are treated as evolving documents that adjust to
real-time needs. Digital tools like Building Information Modeling help teams stay in sync. While challenges
still exist in those systems, they are better equipped to respond without derailing project flow or reducing
quality.
In Nigeria, most construction teams are still working with traditional tools and methods. Although a few large
projects have shown what is possible when documentation is kept flexible, these examples are still the
exception. Some of the barriers include high software costs, limited training, and a regulatory environment that
expects fixed, finalized documents. A shift in mindset is also necessary. There is still a strong belief that once a
drawing is printed and signed, it should not change, even when conditions on the ground require it.Change will
not happen all at once, but there are practical steps the industry can begin to take.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2634
Recommendations
Align drawings and specifications throughout the project: These documents should be developed
and revised together. Keeping them in sync prevents contradictions and supports better communication
between all stakeholders.
Adopt digital tools, even if starting small: Full BIM implementation may take time, but there are
simpler collaborative tools that allow teams to track revisions, share updates, and manage documents
more effectively.
Build skills through training and awareness: Many professionals still lack exposure to modern
documentation tools. Workshops, short training programs, and peer mentoring can help close this gap
gradually.
Encourage early involvement from all parties: Contractors, engineers, and consultants should be part
of design discussions from the beginning. Their input helps reduce the need for major changes later in
the process.
Update approval processes to allow controlled revisions: Government agencies and planning
authorities should consider phased submissions or version control systems. This would allow updates to
be made without restarting the entire approval cycle.
Suggestions for Further Research
This study has made it clear that flexibility in construction documentation is not a luxury. It is essential for
improving communication, reducing conflict, and delivering better project outcomes. When professionals are
able to respond to change without being held back by outdated documents, they build with greater confidence
and accuracy. With steady investment in tools, training, and collaboration, the Nigerian construction industry
can begin to move toward a more adaptable and efficient future.
While this study has highlighted the value of flexibility in working drawings and specifications, further
research is needed to deepen the understanding of its long-term impacts. Future studies could adopt
longitudinal research methods to track projects that actively implement flexible documentation practices in
Nigeria over time, assessing their effects on cost, quality, and project delivery. Additionally, deeper
investigations into the regulatory reforms required to institutionalize flexible documentation, such as digital
submission policies and adaptive approval frameworks, would provide valuable insights for policy and
practice.
REFERENCES
1. Adewumi, Bamidele J.; Onamade, Akintunde O., Asaju, Opeyemi A.; & Adegbile, Michael B.O.
(2023). Impact of Architectural Education on Energy Sustainability in Selected Schools of Architecture
in Lagos Megacity. Caleb International Journal of Development Studies, 6(2), 209-218.
2. Opeyemi A. Asaju; Bamidele J. Adewumi; Akintunde O. Onamade, Oluwole A. Alagbe(2024).
Environmental Impact on Energy Efficiency of Architectural Studios in Selected Tertiary Institutions in
Lagos Mega City, Nigeria. Gus-Multidisciplinary Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1), 29-37.
3. Adewumi, B.J., Onamade, A.O., David-Mukoro, K.D., Bamiloye, M.I., Otuonoyo,, G.A., Chukwuka,
O.P., & Oru, T.O. (2023). Quality Reassurance in Construction Projects: Leveraging Specifications for
Standards and Testing Materials/Workmanship. International Journal of Research and Innovation in
Social Science, 9(3), 1662-1672.
4. Hassan, T.A., Adewumi, B.J., Olukunga, O.A. (2024). An Empirical Review on Affordable Housing
Estate Using Vernacular Architecture in Lagos State. EKSU Journal of the Management Scientists,
3(1), 218-224.
5. Adewumi, Bamidele J., Asaju, Opeyemi A., Bello, Ahmed O., Atulegwu, Akudo E., Ibhafidon,
Osesesele F., David-Mukoro, K.D.,Otuonoyo, George A.& Ogunyemi, Olaoye G. (2025a). The Role of
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 2635
Specifications in Material Selection for Architects. Jigawa Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (JMS),
8(1), 74-89.
6. Oru, T.O., Adewumi, B.J., Asaju, O.A. (2024). A Comparative Study on Improving Energy Efficiency
in Multi-Apartment Residential Buildings. EKSU Journal of the Management Scientists, 3(1), 255-267.
7. Bamidele J. Adewumi, Akintunde O. Onamade, Felix A. Onyikeh, George A. Otuonoyo, Oluwole A.
Alagbe, Michael B.O. Adegbile, & Matthew A. Dayomi (2025b). Who benefits? A Deep Dive into the
Social and Economic Impact of Cooperative Housing Estates in Lagos Megacity. UNIABUJA Journal
of Engineering and Technology, 2(1), 104-117.
8. Alagbe, W. K., Otuonuyo, G. A., Adewumi, B. J., Onamade, A. O., & Asaju, O. A. (2024). Impact of
specification on construction administration for project management within Lagos Megacity.
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 46644672.
9. Anumba, C. J., & Messner, J. I. (2021). Digital twins and the future of construction documentation.
Automation in Construction, 125, 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103618
10. Azhar, S., Khalfan, M., & Maqsood, T. (2020). Building Information Modeling (BIM): Now and
beyond. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 20(2), 2840.
https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v20i2.7200
11. Coleman, H., Lee, P., & Mohamad, F. (2020). Specifications and regulatory alignment for inclusive
technology deployment. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 57(2), 149165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101564
12. Emesiobi, P. M., Otuonuyo, G. A., Adewumi, B. J., Asaju, O. A., & Onamade, A. O. (2024).
Specification: A key tool for efficient facility management in Lagos Megacity. International Journal of
Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(11), 27172723.
13. Ezeokoli, F. O., Akinradewo, O. F., & Ogunsemi, D. R. (2023). Assessment of specification practices
on construction quality in public building projects in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Design and
Construction, 6(1), 4559.
14. Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Naismith, N. (2021). Parametric modeling
and construction innovation: A review. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 542
562.
15. Gurevich, U., & Sacks, R. (2020). Digital collaboration in construction: A systems approach to BIM
implementation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1), 04019087.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001710
16. Leygonie, J., Motamedi, A., & Iordanova, I. (2022). Technology adoption and gender equity in smart
construction environments. Journal of Smart Built Environment, 8(1), 5571.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBE-12-2021-0043
17. Owolabi, T. O. S., Harry, E. G., Adewumi, B. J., Onamade, A. O., & Alagbe, O. A. (2024). Ensuring
quality in construction project: The role of specifications as quality assurance tools. Anchor University
Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 181191.
18. Oyedele, L. O., Ajayi, S. O., & Kadiri, K. O. (2020). Smart construction: The role of BIM in enhancing
flexibility and productivity. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 7(3), 112.
19. Patacas, J., Dawood, N., & Kassem, M. (2021). Improving information flow and collaboration through
digital working drawings. Journal of Construction Innovation, 21(4), 841860.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JCI-06-2020-0052
20. Rahman, M. M., & Sidwell, A. C. (2020). The role of procurement systems in enabling flexibility in
documentation. Construction Management and Economics, 38(2), 101115.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1695991
21. Sacks, R., Eastman, C. M., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2020). BIM handbook: A guide to building
information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers (3rd ed.).
Wiley.
22. Tariq, S., Shah, U., & Usman, M. (2021). Impact of digital fabrication on architectural design and
documentation. Journal of Construction Technology and Management, 8(2), 3951.