Agenda 2063. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these policies is undermined by weak implementation, poor
coordination, and limited monitoring. This aligns with policy implementation theory (Pressman & Wildavsky,
1984), which emphasises that the distance between policy design and policy delivery is often where failure
occurs. The rhetoric of universal access contrasts sharply with the lived reality of frequent outages and
inequitable distribution. The lesson here is that ambition is necessary but insufficient; institutional strength and
accountability are the decisive variables.
The second and third questions focused on systemic and institutional barriers to service delivery. The findings
of corruption (37%), weak regulation (28%), political interference (21%), and lack of community involvement
(14%) reflect governance deficits that go beyond technical constraints. According to governance theory
(Rhodes, 1996), public service delivery relies on accountability, transparency, and responsiveness. In Sierra
Leone, these attributes are weak. Utilities are not insulated from political interference, regulators lack
enforcement power, and corruption erodes both financial resources and public trust. From the standpoint of
institutionalism (North, 1990), the problem is not simply mismanagement but deeply entrenched institutional
weaknesses. For instance, corruption diverts resources that could strengthen service delivery, while political
interference undermines the autonomy of sector actors, such as EDSA and EWRC. Weak regulation allows
illegal connections and billing inefficiencies to thrive, undermining revenue generation and perpetuating
service unreliability. These structural dysfunctions confirm that the most significant barriers are institutional
rather than technical in nature.
The third research question explored citizens’ perceptions of affordability, reliability, and quality. The results
are stark: electricity is widely perceived as unaffordable, unreliable, and unfairly distributed. High tariffs,
frequent outages, and rural-urban disparities dominate the narrative. These perceptions align with equity and
distributive justice theory (Rawls, 1971), which emphasises that policies must not only exist but also yield fair
and inclusive outcomes. Where energy access is skewed in favour of urban elites, the legitimacy of the system
is undermined. Moreover, unreliable electricity deepens economic vulnerability. Households divert scarce
income to expensive alternatives such as diesel generators or kerosene, while businesses face production
disruptions. Schools and health facilities are similarly constrained, perpetuating intergenerational poverty and
inequality. Citizens’ perceptions, therefore, are not just subjective judgments; they reflect real socio-economic
consequences of poor governance and weak systems.
The fourth research question addressed the sustainability and inclusivity of donor-funded renewable energy
projects. Findings suggest that while donors have played a catalytic role in introducing solar mini-grids and
off-grid solutions, these projects often fail once external funding ends. The reasons, including a lack of
community ownership, inadequate integration into national frameworks, and insufficient training, highlight the
dangers of donor dependency. This aligns with dependency theory, which critiques reliance on external actors
for critical services. Donor-driven projects may provide short-term relief, but they weaken long-term resilience
if local institutions are not empowered to sustain them. Similarly, institutional capacity theory emphasises that
sustainability depends on strengthening endogenous institutions rather than perpetuating reliance on exogenous
support. Without local ownership and skills transfer, donor-funded initiatives risk becoming showcase projects
rather than systemic solutions.
A notable weakness of the study is that while it identifies corruption, weak enforcement, and political
interference as structural impediments, their direct impact on service outcomes has not been quantified. To
strengthen policy relevance, future research should establish measurable correlations, such as estimating
revenue losses from illegal connections, the percentage of outages linked to underinvestment caused by
misappropriated funds, or the delays in electrification targets attributable to political interference. Similarly,
reliance on secondary data in some areas, while pragmatic, highlights the need to strengthen Sierra Leone’s
statistical capacity and triangulate findings with administrative and utility-level datasets to ensure accuracy and
reduce overdependence on external sources.
Similarly, the proposed hybrid framework, although conceptually robust, remains broad and prescriptive
without detailed implementation pathways. To enhance applicability, it should be refined into actionable
strategies with measurable indicators, such as reductions in system losses, the addition of renewable
megawatts, affordability thresholds, and benchmarks for rural electrification. Financing also requires a deeper