INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3695
Understanding the Policy-Performance Nexus in Sierra Leones
Energy Sector: Toward a New Framework for Service Delivery
1
Dr. Albert Harrison Harvey.,
2
Dr. Dante A. Bendu.,
3
Mrs. Nancy Harrison Harvey.,
4
Azikiwe Peter
Onwualu
1
Deputy Managing Director, Sierra Leone Water Company (SALWACO) President, African Experts
for Innovations and Sustainable Development Ltd Visiting Professor, African University of Science and
Technology, Abuja, Nigeria
2
Senior Lecturer, Fourah Bay College, University of Sierra Leone
3
Principal Officer, ECOWAS Parliament, Abuja, Nigeria
4
President, African University of Science and Technology, Abuja Director, Centre for Climate Change
Adaptation and Mitigation Studies, AUST, Abuja, Nigeria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800333
Received: 05 Sep 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025; Published: 13 October 2025
ABSTRACT
Sierra Leone’s energy sector has long been constrained by limited access, weak governance, and dependence
on donor-funded interventions. Despite ambitious policies and reforms, service delivery outcomes remained
poor. This study investigated the policyperformance nexus to understand why ambitious policies often fail to
translate into reliable, affordable, and sustainable electricity services. A mixed-methods approach was
employed, combining quantitative household surveys (with a 95% response rate) with qualitative key
informant interviews, focus group discussions, and secondary data analysis. This design enabled triangulation
of findings across citizen perceptions, institutional perspectives, and policy documents. The findings indicated
that energy policies in Sierra Leone were ambitious but undermined by weak implementation, corruption,
political interference, and utility inefficiencies. Quantitative results showed that most households perceived
electricity as unaffordable, unreliable, and unfairly distributed. Qualitative insights revealed governance
deficits, including illegal connections, opaque billing systems, and weak regulatory enforcement. Donor-
funded renewable energy projects were found to be unsustainable when community ownership, integration,
and capacity-building were absent. The study concluded that Sierra Leone’s energy sector challenges were not
due to a lack of policy ambition but to systemic governance and institutional weaknesses. To bridge the gap
between policy and performance, a hybrid framework was proposed, emphasising strong governance, financial
sustainability, renewable energy expansion, and community inclusion. This framework offers lessons for
policymakers, donors, and regional stakeholders on advancing resilient and inclusive energy systems in fragile
contexts.
Keywords: Energy policy; Energy governance; Renewable energy; Sierra Leone; Policy - Performance nexus
INTRODUCTION
Overview
Energy remains the cornerstone of socio-economic transformation, shaping industrialisation, service delivery,
and inclusive development. For Sierra Leone, an energy-secure future is indispensable to achieving the
aspirations of the National Development Plan (20192023) and the global commitments of the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7, which seeks to ensure access to affordable, reliable,
sustainable, and modern energy for all by 2030 (United Nations, 2023). Despite these ambitions, the nation's
energy sector faces significant challenges: low electrification rates (approximately 31% nationally and 7% in
rural areas), high system losses, dependence on imported petroleum products, and insufficient investment in
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3696
renewable energy (World Bank, 2023). These issues highlight the structural weaknesses in policy design,
institutional coordination, and performance monitoring, underscoring the need for a new framework in energy
service delivery.
In West Africa, benchmarks from peer countries highlight opportunities for Sierra Leone. Ghana, for instance,
has achieved nearly 88% electrification through strong rural electrification programs, publicprivate
partnerships, and renewable energy expansion (Energy Commission of Ghana, 2022). Similarly, Senegal has
made significant progress in scaling up solar power through its Plan Sénégal Émergent, aiming for universal
access by 2025 and positioning renewables as a strategic growth driver (International Renewable Energy
Agency [IRENA], 2023). These best practices demonstrate how coherent policy frameworks, strategic
investments, and institutional accountability can yield tangible results.
Sierra Leone's energy sector policy targets are ambitious but attainable. The government's Energy Sector
Reform Roadmap (20212030) aims to achieve at least 85% nationwide electricity access by 2030, with
renewable energy contributing over 60% of the national energy mix (Ministry of Energy, 2022). Planned
investments include expanding the Bumbuna hydroelectric project, integrating solar mini-grids in off-grid
communities, and modernising transmission and distribution networks to reduce non-technical losses.
Furthermore, the adoption of results-based financing and performance contracts with utilities, as seen in Côte
d'Ivoire's energy sector, represents an emerging strategy to enhance accountability and service outcomes
(African Development Bank [AfDB], 2023).
Current progress remains uneven. While generation capacity has increased to over 300 MW, primarily from
hydro and thermal sources, distribution bottlenecks, high tariffs, and inadequate rural infrastructure constrain
performance (World Bank, 2023). Moreover, institutional overlaps between the Ministry of Energy, the
Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA), and private operators have slowed reforms. To
overcome these barriers, Sierra Leone must strengthen regulatory oversight, attract private sector participation,
and leverage digital solutions to achieve efficiency gains.
Ultimately, understanding the policy-performance nexus requires not only diagnosing gaps but also proposing
adaptive strategies rooted in regional best practices. A coherent framework that links policy intent with
measurable outcomes, guided by benchmarks from Ghana, Senegal, and te d’Ivoire, offers Sierra Leone a
viable path toward sustainable, inclusive, and resilient energy service delivery.
Background of the Study
Energy is universally acknowledged as a fundamental driver of socio-economic transformation. Access to
affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy is not only a prerequisite for industrialisation, healthcare delivery,
education, and digital connectivity, but also for achieving inclusive growth and climate resilience. The global
development agenda, particularly Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, commits the international
community to ensuring universal energy access, doubling energy efficiency, and substantially increasing the
share of renewables by 2030 (United Nations, 2023). Despite these ambitions, the International Energy
Agency (IEA, 2022) reports that around 675 million people worldwide still lack access to electricity, with the
vast majority living in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Globally, progress in energy access has been uneven, with significant advancements in Asia but persistent gaps
in Africa. Countries such as China and India have made significant gains in electrification through aggressive
policy reforms, large-scale investments in renewable energy, and rural grid extensions. These global
experiences illustrate the critical role of integrated energy policies, financial mobilisation, and governance
structures in ensuring that energy transitions are both inclusive and sustainable (IRENA, 2023).
Africa faces the most acute energy access challenges. The continent is home to approximately 600 million
people without access to electricity, accounting for 80% of the global total (African Development Bank
[AfDB], 2023). The energy deficit undermines industrial growth, weakens public health systems, constrains
digital innovation, and perpetuates poverty. However, Africa possesses some of the world's richest renewable
energy resources, including abundant hydro resources, vast solar potential, and growing wind and geothermal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3697
capacity. Harnessing these resources has become central to continental strategies such as the African Union’s
Agenda 2063, which underscores energy as a backbone of socio-economic transformation.
Despite the potential, weak institutional frameworks, limited financing, and fragmented regional integration
have constrained progress. Regional initiatives such as the West African Power Pool (WAPP) aim to improve
cross-border electricity trade and efficiency but are hindered by political and infrastructural bottlenecks (World
Bank, 2023). For Africa to meet SDG 7 and its own long-term development goals, policies must evolve
beyond targets to incorporate mechanisms for accountability, innovation, and performance monitoring.
In West Africa, several countries provide compelling benchmarks for Sierra Leone. Ghana stands out with
electrification rates exceeding 88%, achieved through its National Electrification Scheme and sustained rural
programs backed by donor support and private sector engagement (Energy Commission of Ghana, 2022). The
country’s integration of renewable energy and digital monitoring systems has improved efficiency and
widened access.
Senegal has pioneered the adoption of renewable energy through its Plan Sénégal Émergent, positioning solar
energy as a strategic growth driver. The commissioning of large-scale solar plants, including Senergy and
Kahone, has contributed to steady progress toward the national target of universal access by 2025
(International Renewable Energy Agency [IRENA], 2023). Côte d’Ivoire, on the other hand, has focused on
strengthening institutional accountability by adopting performance-based contracts with private operators to
expand capacity and enhance efficiency. Nigeria has advanced rural electrification through mini-grid
regulations that have successfully attracted private investment. These benchmarks highlight critical lessons: the
importance of political commitment, the mobilisation of private capital, innovative financing instruments, and
effective regulatory oversight. They also demonstrate that energy access expansion is not solely dependent on
infrastructure, but also on coherent policy frameworks and institutional performance.
Sierra Leone remains one of the least electrified countries in the region. National access stands at
approximately 31%, with rural access as low as 7% - far below the West African average (World Bank, 2023).
Installed capacity is just over 300 MW, sourced from hydro, thermal, and limited solar projects. However, the
sector is plagued by high system losses exceeding 35%, unreliable supply, and dependence on expensive
imported petroleum products. Tariffs remain among the highest in the region, relative to income levels, which
reduces affordability for households and businesses (Ministry of Energy, 2022).
Institutionally, fragmentation weakens performance. The Ministry of Energy provides policy direction, while
the Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA) and the Electricity Generation and Transmission
Company (EGTC) handle operations. Nevertheless, overlapping roles, weak regulation, and limited capacity
hinder accountability. These challenges reveal a significant gap between policy intent and service delivery
outcomes.
Recognising these deficiencies, Sierra Leone has articulated an ambitious Energy Sector Reform Roadmap
(20212030). The roadmap aims for 85% electrification by 2030, with renewables accounting for 60% of the
supply (Ministry of Energy, 2022). Planned interventions include the expansion of the Bumbuna hydroelectric
project, investment in solar mini-grids for rural communities, upgrading transmission and distribution
networks, and deploying innovative grid technologies to reduce technical and commercial losses.
The government also intends to replicate successful regional practices by adopting results-based financing and
attracting private investment through publicprivate partnerships. Partnerships with multilateral development
banks, bilateral donors, and independent power producers are being pursued to mobilise capital. However,
successful implementation will require coherent governance reforms, effective monitoring and evaluation
systems, and stronger coordination among institutions.
Statement of the Problem
Energy has long been recognised as a cornerstone of Sierra Leone's socio-economic development. In the
decades following independence, the country made modest investments in electricity generation, primarily
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3698
through the Bumbuna hydroelectric project, alongside a small network of thermal plants to support Freetown
and regional towns. However, the civil conflict of the 1990s devastated infrastructure, leaving the sector fragile
and underfunded. By the early 2000s, Sierra Leone's energy landscape was characterised by extremely low
electrification rates, dilapidated infrastructure, and over-reliance on imported petroleum products. These
conditions severely constrained industrialisation, access to social services, and overall national
competitiveness.
Today, despite some progress, the energy sector remains among the least developed in West Africa. The
current electrification rate stands at approximately 31% nationally and only 7% in rural areas, which is
significantly lower than that of regional peers such as Ghana (88%) and Senegal (77%) (World Bank, 2023;
IRENA, 2023). Installed capacity has expanded to over 300 MW, with contributions from hydropower,
thermal plants, and solar mini-grids. However, the sector is plagued by inefficiencies, system losses above
35%, weak transmission networks, and high tariffs that undermine affordability for households and businesses.
Institutional fragmentation further complicates progress, with overlapping mandates between the Ministry of
Energy, the Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA), and the Electricity Generation and
Transmission Company (EGTC) leading to duplication, slow reforms, and limited accountability.
This gap between policy intent and performance outcomes lies at the heart of Sierra Leone’s energy dilemma.
Successive governments have articulated ambitious energy policies and strategies, including the National
Energy Policy (2017) and the Energy Sector Reform Roadmap (20212030), which aim to achieve 85%
electrification by 2030, with 60% of the supply coming from renewable sources (Ministry of Energy, 2022).
However, translating these targets into measurable outcomes has been slow and uneven. Weak monitoring
frameworks, inadequate financing, and limited technical capacity result in policy commitments often
remaining aspirational rather than transformative. The result is a persistent mismatch between the scale of
Sierra Leone's energy challenges and the impact of policy interventions.
The implications of this policyperformance gap is profound. Limited energy access constrains industrial
growth, particularly in energy-intensive sectors such as mining, manufacturing, and agriculture. It weakens
healthcare delivery, restricts digital innovation, and perpetuates rural poverty by denying millions of citizens
access to basic services. Moreover, dependence on costly imported fuels exposes the country to global price
shocks, contributing to high tariffs and fiscal pressures. At a time when regional peers are advancing toward
universal access through innovative financing models, renewable energy investments, and strong institutional
frameworks, Sierra Leone risks being left behind.
The government's 2030 vision for the energy sector is ambitious: achieving near-universal access, mainly
powered by renewables, supported by modern infrastructure, and underpinned by efficient and accountable
institutions. This aligns with global commitments under SDG 7 and regional aspirations for sustainable energy
transitions. However, achieving this vision requires a fundamental shift in how policies are designed,
implemented, and monitored. It demands a framework that strengthens institutional coordination, attracts
private investment, enhances accountability, and ensures that performance outcomes align with stated policy
goals.
Therefore, the central problem this study addresses is the disconnect between energy policy formulation and
actual performance in service delivery. Although Sierra Leone has established laudable policy targets, weak
institutional capacity, fragmented governance structures, and inadequate financing have limited progress. To
move from aspiration to realisation, the country must bridge the policyperformance nexus by learning from
regional best practices, recalibrating strategies, and establishing a coherent framework that links policy intent
with measurable results. Only through such a transformation can Sierra Leone transition from its current state,
marked by fragility and underperformance, to where it aspires to be: a nation powered by inclusive,
sustainable, and resilient energy systems.
Research Objectives
The overall objective of this study was to examine the policy–performance nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy
sector and propose a new framework for improving energy service delivery.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3699
Specific Objectives
1. To analyse the historical trajectory of Sierra Leone's energy policies and their impact on sector
performance.
2. To evaluate the current status of energy access, generation, transmission, and distribution in Sierra
Leone in relation to regional benchmarks.
3. To identify institutional, financial, and governance challenges that contribute to the policy
performance gap in the energy sector.
4. To explore best practices from West African countries such as Ghana, Senegal, and Côte d’Ivoire that
have successfully aligned energy policies with service delivery outcomes.
5. To develop a policyperformance framework tailored to Sierra Leone that strengthens institutional
accountability, promotes renewable energy adoption, and enhances private sector participation.
Research Questions
1. What has been the historical evolution of Sierra Leone’s energy policies, and how have these shaped
sector performances?
2. What is the current status of energy access, generation capacity, transmission, and distribution in Sierra
Leone compared to regional benchmarks?
3. What institutional, financial, and governance factors contribute to the persistent gap between energy
policies and actual performance in Sierra Leone?
4. What lessons can Sierra Leone learn from West African countries that have successfully aligned energy
policy with service delivery outcomes?
5. How can Sierra Leone design and implement a policyperformance framework that ensures
accountability, attracts investment, and accelerates progress toward universal, sustainable, and
inclusive energy access?
Significance of the Study
This study is significant because it addresses one of Sierra Leone's most pressing development challenges: the
persistent gap between energy policy formulation and performance outcomes. By examining the policy
performance nexus, the study offers evidence-based insights that can inform government decision-making and
ensure that energy policies transition from aspirational targets to measurable, transformative outcomes. For
policymakers, the findings will offer practical recommendations for strengthening institutional accountability,
aligning regulatory frameworks, and enhancing sector governance.
For the private sector, the study underscores opportunities for increased participation in Sierra Leone's energy
transition. Reliable and sustainable energy systems are critical for industrial growth, entrepreneurship, and
digital innovation. By identifying barriers to private sector involvement and proposing frameworks that
encourage publicprivate partnerships, the study can support investment confidence and foster an environment
that enables business growth. This is particularly relevant as the government seeks to attract independent
power producers and leverage innovative financing models.
At the regional level, the study contributes to West Africa's broader efforts for energy integration under the
West African Power Pool (WAPP). By benchmarking Sierra Leone's performance against regional peers such
as Ghana, Senegal, and Côte d'Ivoire, the research highlights lessons that can accelerate progress toward
universal access. This comparative perspective not only enriches policy design but also strengthens Sierra
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3700
Leone's contribution to regional cooperation on energy security, renewable adoption, and cross-border power
trade.
Academically, the study fills a critical gap in the literature on fragile states and energy governance. While
many studies focus on advanced or emerging economies, limited attention has been given to small, post-
conflict nations such as Sierra Leone. By situating the country's experience within broader theoretical and
empirical debates, the research advances knowledge on the interplay between policy, institutions, and
performance in energy service delivery.
Ultimately, this study is both timely and necessary. It offers a practical roadmap for Sierra Leone to transition
from chronic energy underperformance to a future of sustainable, inclusive, and resilient energy access,
contributing to national development and regional competitiveness.
Scope of the Study
This study focused on understanding the policyperformance nexus in Sierra Leone's energy sector to propose
a new framework for effective service delivery. The scope is designed to provide clarity on the boundaries
within which the research is conducted, while also acknowledging its limitations.
The study is geographically limited to Sierra Leone, examining national energy policies, institutional
frameworks, and sector performance. Particular attention is given to both urban centres, such as Freetown,
where electricity access is relatively higher, and rural communities, where access remains critically low at
around 7% (World Bank, 2023). While the primary focus is on Sierra Leone, comparative insights are drawn
from regional benchmarks in West Africa, specifically Ghana, Senegal, and te d'Ivoire, to highlight best
practices and lessons applicable to Sierra Leone's context.
The study covers the period from 2000 to 2030. The starting point reflects the post-conflict reconstruction era,
during which significant reforms in the energy sector began. The end point aligns with Sierra Leone's Energy
Sector Reform Roadmap (20212030) and the global deadline for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7
(SDG 7) on universal access to energy. This timeframe enables an assessment of historical trajectories, current
realities, and future targets.
Thematically, the research is centred on the interplay between energy policies and actual performance
outcomes. Areas of focus include access to electricity, generation capacity, adoption of renewable energy,
institutional arrangements, financing mechanisms, and governance structures. The study does not provide
detailed technical designs of power projects but instead emphasises policy frameworks, institutional
performance, and service delivery impacts.
The research adopts a qualitative and comparative approach, drawing on secondary data from government
reports, international organisations, and scholarly publications. Regional best practices are examined to
identify adaptable strategies for Sierra Leone. The analysis is interpretive, aiming to build a conceptual
framework rather than to provide econometric modelling.
Limitations:
The study is limited by reliance on secondary data, which may not always capture the most recent sectoral
developments. Furthermore, while regional benchmarks are included, contextual differences may limit the
direct transferability of best practices. Nonetheless, the study offers valuable insights for refining policy and
strategic planning.
Organisation of Chapter One
Chapter One introduces the study and sets the foundation for the entire research. It is organised into the
following sections:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3701
1. Background of the Study
This section provided a comprehensive overview of global, regional, and national energy issues,
emphasising the crucial role of energy in driving socio-economic development. It narrows the discussion
from global and African contexts to the specific challenges and opportunities in Sierra Leone's energy
sector.
2. Statement of the Problem
Here, the central research problem is articulated. The section traced the origins of Sierra Leone's energy
sector, its current state, and its future aspirations, while emphasising the gap between policy aspirations
and actual performance outcomes.
3. Research Objectives
The study's overall objective and specific objectives are presented. These objectives outlined the main
goals of the research and guide the investigation into the policyperformance nexus.
4. Research Questions
This section formulates the key questions that the study seeks to answer. These questions are aligned with
the objectives and frame the empirical and theoretical inquiry.
5. Significance of the Study
This section highlighted the significance of the research for policymakers, the private sector, regional
integration efforts, and the academic community. It demonstrates the study's contribution to national
development and scholarly debates on energy governance.
6. Scope of the Study
This section defined the geographical, temporal, thematic, and methodological boundaries of the study,
while also acknowledging its limitations. It ensures clarity on what the research covers and excludes.
7. Organisation of the Study
Finally, the chapter concludes by outlining the structure of the entire dissertation. It provides a chapter-by-
chapter breakdown to show how the study flows from introduction to conclusion.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Overview
The purpose of this literature review is to establish the intellectual and analytical foundation for understanding
the policy–performance nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy sector. A literature review does more than summarise
existing knowledge; it critically synthesises theoretical perspectives, empirical evidence, and conceptual
insights to identify patterns, contradictions, and gaps that inform the present study (Creswell & Creswell,
2021). Within the energy context, this is particularly important, as service delivery outcomes depend not only
on the presence of sound policies but also on the systems through which such policies are implemented and the
performance frameworks that evaluate their impact.
This chapter links policy, systems, and performance in order to unpack why ambitious energy reforms in many
developing countries, including Sierra Leone, often yield uneven results. Policies provide the strategic vision
and direction, but their effectiveness is mediated by systemic factors such as institutional capacity, financing
arrangements, and technological adoption. Ultimately, performance outcomes, measured in terms of access,
reliability, affordability, and sustainability, reveal whether policies have been successfully translated into
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3702
tangible benefits for citizens. By highlighting this triangular relationship, the review situates Sierra Leone’s
experience within both regional benchmarks and global best practices.
The structure of the chapter is organised into five key parts. It begins with a conceptual review, which defines
critical terms and presents the study's conceptual framework. A theoretical review of models relevant to policy
implementation and governance follows this. The empirical review then explores global, African, West
African, and Sierra Leonean perspectives. The chapter concludes with a synthesis of gaps and a summary,
which together set the stage for the methodological approach in Chapter Three.
Conceptual Review
Definition of Key Concepts
Policy and Energy Policy
Policy is broadly understood as a deliberate course of action or inaction chosen by governments or institutions
to address a particular issue or achieve specific objectives (Anderson, 2021). In the context of public
administration, policy serves as both a guide and framework for decision-making, resource allocation, and
implementation strategies.
Energy policy, therefore, refers to the set of decisions, rules, and strategies adopted by governments to
regulate, manage, and expand energy production, distribution, and consumption (Sovacool & Griffiths, 2020).
It encompasses diverse dimensions, including energy access, affordability, sustainability, security, and the
transition to renewable energy sources. For developing countries like Sierra Leone, energy policy must strike a
balance between national development priorities and global imperatives, particularly in terms of climate
resilience and achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) (IEA, 2022).
Performance and Service Delivery in the Energy Sector
Performance in the energy sector is typically assessed through indicators such as efficiency, reliability,
affordability, accessibility, and sustainability of energy services (World Bank, 2023). Service delivery, in this
regard, extends beyond electricity generation to include equitable distribution, consistent supply, and customer
satisfaction. In fragile economies, performance is often constrained by infrastructural deficits, financial
mismanagement, and weak institutional capacity (Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021). Measuring performance thus
requires a multidimensional lens that accounts for technical efficiency, governance, and citizen outcomes. For
instance, Sierra Leone’s electrification rate remains below 30 percent, reflecting a gap between policy
intentions and actual service delivery (AfDB, 2023).
Systems Approach in Energy Governance
The systems approach views energy governance as an interconnected framework of policies, institutions,
technologies, and actors that collectively shape outcomes (Meadowcroft & Florini, 2021). Rather than
analysing isolated interventions, this approach highlights the interdependence between policy inputs,
institutional structures, market dynamics, and external shocks. It highlights the need for systemic alignment to
achieve transformative energy outcomes. In Sierra Leone, weak institutional coordination among the Ministry
of Energy, Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA), and other stakeholders has often
undermined the effectiveness of reforms. A systems approach can therefore illuminate the pathways through
which fragmented decision-making erodes efficiency, while integrated governance strengthens resilience
(Odarno et al., 2020).
The “Policy–Performance Nexus”
The policyperformance nexus refers to the critical relationship between policy formulation and the outcomes
achieved in service delivery. In theory, well-designed policies should lead to improved performance indicators;
however, in practice, this nexus is often disrupted by implementation gaps, resource constraints, and
institutional weaknesses (Peters, 2022). In the energy sector, the nexus is significant because policies must
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3703
address multi-layered challenges such as affordability, inclusivity, and sustainability while navigating political
and economic constraints. For Sierra Leone, understanding the policyperformance nexus means interrogating
why ambitious policy goals such as the National Electricity Access Policy (NEAP), have not consistently
translated into tangible improvements in electricity access and quality of service. This conceptual lens,
therefore, frames the study's focus on aligning policies, systems, and performance outcomes for effective
energy service delivery.
Energy as a Driver of Development
Energy is widely regarded as a fundamental driver of socio-economic transformation. Reliable, affordable, and
sustainable energy enables industrialisation, agricultural productivity, healthcare, education, and digital
innovation, thereby contributing directly to inclusive growth and poverty reduction (World Bank, 2023).
Without adequate energy, economies struggle to industrialise, public services remain inefficient, and citizens
are excluded from opportunities in the modern digital economy. Thus, energy is not simply a sectoral priority
but a cross-cutting enabler of development that underpins progress toward multiple Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs).
From a global perspective, the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) to ensure access to
affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all” - recognises energy as central to human
development and environmental sustainability. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2023),
achieving universal electricity access by 2030 is not only an energy target but a prerequisite for broader
development outcomes such as reducing inequality, strengthening resilience, and advancing climate action.
Countries that have successfully expanded energy access, such as Vietnam and Brazil, have demonstrated how
universal electrification accelerates industrial growth, enhances education, and stimulates private sector
investment (IEA, 2022).
In Africa, energy is increasingly seen as the backbone of Agenda 2063, the African Union’s long-term
development vision. Despite significant potential in renewable resources, such as solar, wind, hydro, and
biomass, the continent continues to face acute energy deficits. Over 600 million Africans still lack access to
electricity, and nearly 900 million rely on traditional biomass for cooking, resulting in severe health and
environmental consequences (AfDB, 2023). Energy insecurity remains a bottleneck to Africa's
competitiveness in global markets, constraining industrialisation, technological advancement, and job creation.
The African Development Bank (AfDB) argues that closing Africa's energy gap could increase economic
growth by 2-4% annually and facilitate structural transformation (AfDB, 2022).
West Africa provides both cautionary lessons and best-practice benchmarks. Ghana’s National Electrification
Scheme, launched in 1989, raised electricity access from less than 25% in the 1990s to over 80% by 2020,
mainly through grid expansion, rural electrification programmes, and renewable energy investments (Kumi,
2021). Similarly, Côte d'Ivoire has achieved near-universal access through sustained investment in hydropower
and a stable regulatory framework (IEA, 2022). Nigeria, despite being the region's largest economy and energy
producer, still struggles with chronic underperformance, unreliable supply, and governance deficits, illustrating
how policy incoherence and weak institutions undermine service delivery (Odarno et al., 2020). The West
African Power Pool (WAPP), established by ECOWAS, is another important benchmark, aiming to create a
regional electricity market that enhances supply reliability and reduces costs through cross-border power trade
(ECOWAS, 2022).
In Sierra Leone, energy's role as a driver of development is both urgent and transformative. The country's
electrification rate remains below 30%, with rural areas severely underserved (World Bank, 2023). This
limited access constrains business productivity, discourages foreign investment, and restricts opportunities for
digital innovation, particularly for young people and women. Frequent outages and high electricity tariffs also
undermine competitiveness in manufacturing, hospitality, and services. However, Sierra Leone possesses vast
renewable energy potential, including solar, hydro, and biomass, which, if harnessed, could accelerate the
government's ambitions for universal access under the National Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP).
Expanding energy access would unlock opportunities for value addition in agriculture, improve health
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3704
outcomes through reliable power in hospitals, and foster inclusive growth in line with the government's "Big
Five" development priorities.
The energy is not merely an infrastructural issue but a central pillar of socio-economic transformation. For
Sierra Leone, aligning energy policies with robust Implementation, regional integration, and sustainable
financing is critical to leveraging energy as a catalyst for industrialisation, poverty reduction, and inclusive
development.
Frameworks for Energy Service Delivery
Energy service delivery requires coherent frameworks that integrate policy, financing, institutional
arrangements, and technology to ensure sustainable, affordable, and inclusive access to energy services. A
framework for energy service delivery is essentially a structured approach that defines how policies are
translated into systems, how systems mobilise resources, and how outcomes are measured against development
goals (Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021). In fragile and developing contexts, such as Sierra Leone, the design of
these frameworks is critical because poorly aligned policies and institutions often result in service deficits
despite the country's abundant natural resources.
Universal Access and Just Energy Transition
The concept of universal access underpins global frameworks, such as Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG
7), which aims to provide "affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all" by 2030 (World Bank,
2023). Achieving universal access requires both grid expansion in urban centres and decentralised solutions
such as mini-grids and solar home systems for rural areas (IEA, 2023). In recent years, the discourse has
expanded to include the idea of a "just energy transition," which emphasises that the shift from fossil fuels to
renewables must be inclusive, equitable, and sensitive to vulnerable populations (Sovacool et al., 2021). In
West Africa, this has meant ensuring that rural communities, women, and low-income households benefit
equally from renewable energy investments, rather than being excluded by affordability or access barriers.
Resilience and Sustainability
Another critical dimension of the energy service delivery framework is resilience, especially in the face of
climate change, economic volatility, and geopolitical disruptions. A resilient energy framework integrates
renewable energy technologies, diversified supply sources, and climate-adaptive infrastructure to reduce
vulnerability to external shocks (Meadowcroft & Florini, 2021). For Sierra Leone, frequent fuel price
fluctuations and the impacts of climate change on hydropower capacity illustrate the importance of resilience
in planning. Sustainability also entails reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels and harnessing domestic
renewable resources such as solar, wind, and hydro, which are abundant yet underutilised.
Equity and Inclusion
Equity is a defining feature of effective service delivery frameworks. Energy poverty disproportionately affects
rural populations, women, and youth in fragile economies (UNDP, 2022). Therefore, energy frameworks must
incorporate mechanisms to address inequalities in access, affordability, and quality of service. This includes
targeted subsidies for the poor, gender-sensitive energy policies, and community-based electrification
initiatives. For example, Ghana’s rural electrification programme and Kenya’s Last Mile Connectivity Project
demonstrate how equity can be mainstreamed into policy and practice (Kumi, 2021; Odarno et al., 2020). In
Sierra Leone, however, access gaps persist between Freetown and rural districts, highlighting the need for
equity-focused frameworks.
Financing and Institutional Models
Financing remains a central pillar of energy service delivery frameworks. Traditional state-led financing is
being increasingly supplemented by PublicPrivate Partnerships (PPPs), donor support, and innovative
mechanisms such as Results-Based Financing (RBF) and blended finance (AfDB, 2022). These models are
designed to attract private investment while ensuring public oversight and accountability. Institutional
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3705
frameworks must also ensure coordination between ministries, regulators, utilities, and local governments to
prevent fragmentation. For Sierra Leone, limited fiscal space means innovative financing models, such as
community-owned mini-grids supported by development partners, are crucial for scaling access (World Bank,
2023).
Regional and Global Alignment
Regional bodies, such as ECOWAS and the West African Power Pool (WAPP), provide frameworks that
complement national strategies by fostering regional integration, promoting cross-border electricity trade, and
harmonising regulatory environments (ECOWAS, 2022). Globally, initiatives such as Sustainable Energy for
All (SEforALL) and the Paris Climate Agreement also shape national frameworks by setting targets for
decarbonisation, renewable adoption, and universal access. Aligning Sierra Leone’s frameworks with regional
and global benchmarks is essential for mobilising investment and achieving sustainable outcomes.
Implications for Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone, the challenge lies not in the absence of frameworks but in their weak Implementation. While the
National Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP) and National Electricity Access Policy (NEAP) provide
ambitious roadmaps, institutional bottlenecks, financing constraints, and capacity gaps have limited their
impact. A reformed framework for energy service delivery in Sierra Leone must therefore integrate universal
access targets, resilience-building, equity considerations, and innovative financing within a coherent
governance structure. This alignment is necessary to bridge the persistent gap between policy ambition and
performance outcomes.
Conceptual Framework
A conceptual framework provides the analytical lens through which the study examines the relationship
between policy, systems, and performance in Sierra Leone’s energy sector. It serves as a bridge between theory
and practice, helping to operationalise abstract concepts into measurable variables (Creswell & Creswell,
2021). For this study, the framework captures the policy - performance nexus by highlighting how policy
inputs interact with systemic factors to influence performance outcomes in energy service delivery.
Independent Variables (Policy Inputs)
Policies serve as the foundation of the framework, representing the government's strategies, commitments, and
regulatory instruments designed to enhance energy access and reliability. The key policy inputs include:
i. Energy Policies and Reforms National Electricity Access Policy (NEAP), National Renewable
Energy Action Plan (NREAP), and other legislative frameworks designed to expand access and
transition towards renewables.
ii. Institutional and Governance Structures Role of the Ministry of Energy, Electricity Distribution and
Supply Authority (EDSA), Electricity Generation and Transmission Company (EGTC), and related
agencies in Implementation.
iii. Financing and Investment Models State funding, donor aid, PublicPrivate Partnerships (PPPs), and
Results-Based Financing (RBF).
iv. Regulatory and Legal Environment Tariff-setting mechanisms, energy regulations, and enforcement
of quality standards.
These policy inputs represent the formal intentions and frameworks designed to drive the sector forward.
Intervening Variables (Systemic and Contextual Factors)
Even well-crafted policies can fail to achieve intended outcomes if systemic or contextual barriers undermine
Implementation. Intervening variables include:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3706
i. Institutional Capacity and Political Will The ability of institutions to coordinate, enforce regulations,
and resist political interference.
ii. Regional Integration Participation in the West African Power Pool (WAPP) and ECOWAS energy
cooperation.
iii. Global and Local Shocks Climate change impacts on hydropower, fuel price volatility, and post-
conflict fragility.
iv. Technology and Innovation Adoption of renewable energy solutions, smart grids, and digital payment
systems for electricity.
These variables represent the environmental conditions that either enable or constrain the effective translation
of policy into performance.
Dependent Variables (Performance Outcomes)
The dependent variables reflect the outcomes of energy policies as measured by service delivery indicators.
For Sierra Leone, these include:
i. Electricity Access Rates Proportion of households and businesses with reliable electricity (urban and
rural).
ii. Reliability and Quality of Supply Reduction in outages, load shedding, and system losses.
iii. Affordability and Equity Cost of electricity relative to household income and equitable access for
marginalised groups.
iv. Renewable Energy Penetration Share of solar, hydro, and other renewables in the national energy
mix.
v. Sustainability of Energy Services Long-term viability of supply systems, including environmental
and financial sustainability.
Together, these outcomes provide a multidimensional assessment of performance.
Diagrammatic Representation of the Framework
The conceptual framework can be represented as a three-tier model:
1. Policy Inputs (Independent Variables) 2. Systemic/Intervening Factors 3. Performance
Outcomes (Dependent Variables)
Visually, the framework would appear as:
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Framework for the Policy–Performance Nexus in Sierra Leone’s Energy Sector.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3707
The conceptual framework illustrates the relationship between policy inputs, systemic/intervening variables,
and performance outcomes in Sierra Leone's energy sector. It highlights how policies and governance
structures interact with institutional, regional, and global dynamics to influence service delivery outcomes,
including access, reliability, affordability, renewable energy penetration, and sustainability.
The framework is informed by governance and policy implementation theories, which emphasise the
interaction between policy design and contextual realities (Peters, 2022). It also draws from systems theory,
recognising that energy governance is not linear but shaped by interdependencies among institutions, markets,
and global forces (Meadowcroft & Florini, 2021). Sierra Leone, this framework is particularly relevant because
past reforms have often been strong in policy formulation but weak in performance outcomes, due to systemic
constraints such as institutional fragmentation, financing deficits, and low technical capacity (AfDB, 2023;
World Bank, 2023).
By articulating the relationships among policy inputs, systemic factors, and outcomes, the framework provides
a structured approach to interrogating why ambitious energy policies in Sierra Leone have not consistently
translated into reliable, affordable, and sustainable service delivery. It also guides the empirical investigation
of this study, ensuring alignment between conceptual clarity, research objectives, and analytical focus.
Theoretical Review
The theoretical review situates this study within frameworks that illuminate the relationship between policy
ambition, systemic constraints, and performance outcomes in Sierra Leone’s energy sector. Governance theory
emphasises the importance of transparency, accountability, and institutional checks for effective service
delivery.
Thus far, in fragile states, weak regulatory environments and political interference often compromise
implementation. Institutional theory further explains how entrenched structures and norms shape the capacity
of agencies like EDSA and EWRC to enforce reforms. In contrast, public choice theory underscores how rent-
seeking behaviour and elite capture divert resources away from citizens’ needs.
In addition, energy transition and innovation theories highlight the role of renewable technologies, financing
models, and community participation in achieving sustainability. These perspectives reveal that bridging
policy and performance requires not only ambitious planning but also systemic reforms that align incentives,
strengthen institutions, and expand access to opportunities.
Through integrating these theoretical lenses, the review provides a robust foundation for interrogating why
energy policies remain ambitious in design yet weak in practice, and how a transformative, context-sensitive
framework could improve reliability, affordability, and equity in Sierra Leone’s electricity sector.
Policy Implementation Theories
Policy implementation remains one of the most critical yet challenging stages in the policy process. While the
formulation of ambitious policies reflects governmental intent, it is Implementation that determines whether
policy goals translate into tangible outcomes for citizens. Pressman and Wildavsky's (2020) classic analysis in
Implementation underscored how the success or failure of public policies is often decided not in the drafting
rooms of policymakers but in the complex networks of institutions, bureaucrats, and local actors tasked with
execution. In the energy sector, this tension is particularly pronounced, given that energy is a highly technical,
capital-intensive, and politically sensitive domain where outcomes affect economic growth, industrialisation,
and human welfare (Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021).
Sierra Leone, a country striving to achieve universal electricity access amidst institutional fragility and
resource constraints, understands that understanding the theories of policy implementation is indispensable.
Despite multiple energy sector reforms - such as the Electricity Act (2011), the National Electricity Access
Policy (NEAP, 2015), and the National Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP, 2016) - performance
outcomes remain modest, with electrification rates below 30 percent and persistent service reliability
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3708
challenges (World Bank, 2023). This disconnect between policy ambitions and outcomes reflects the so-called
“implementation gap” that many developing countries face.
To interrogate these dynamics, three theoretical lenses are beneficial: the top-down approach, the bottom-up
perspective, and the policy cycle framework. Each provides distinctive insights into how policies are translated
into practice, the actors that matter most, and the conditions under which Implementation succeeds or fails.
Taken together, they shed light on why Sierra Leone's energy sector has struggled to meet its targets and how
hybrid approaches could better align policy, systems, and performance.
The Top-down Perspective
The top-down model of policy implementation emerged in the 1970s, primarily through the works of Pressman
and Wildavsky (2020) and Van Meter and Van Horn. This perspective views Implementation as a hierarchical
process in which policymakers at the central level design clear objectives and rely on subordinate agencies to
execute them faithfully. The underlying assumption is that if goals are unambiguous, resources are sufficient,
and authority is respected, policies will be implemented successfully (Matland, 2021).
Key Assumptions and Features
Top-down theorists argue that effective Implementation depends on:
i. Clarity of Objectives Policy goals must be explicit and measurable.
ii. Adequate Resources Financial, technical, and human resources must be available to executing
agencies.
iii. Control Mechanisms Authority must flow downward, ensuring compliance by lower-level actors.
iv. Minimal Distortion Implementers should carry out directives without reinterpretation or resistance.
This perspective resonates strongly in energy governance, where governments often centralise decision-
making to mobilise resources for large-scale infrastructure projects such as hydropower dams, national grids,
or renewable energy rollouts. For example, Ghana's electrification success story is often attributed to clear
national targets, central coordination, and strong alignment between donors and the government (Kumi, 2021).
Sierra Leone's energy reforms have followed mainly a top-down orientation. The Electricity Act of 2011,
which unbundled generation, transmission, and distribution, was a centrally driven reform influenced by
international best practices and donor recommendations (AfDB, 2023). Similarly, the National Renewable
Energy Action Plan (NREAP) was formulated with technical assistance from international agencies and
adopted by government ministries with minimal grassroots consultation. While these policies provided clear
visions, their Implementation revealed the limitations of the top-down model. EDSA, the primary distribution
utility, faces chronic capacity and financing challenges, leading to frequent outages and revenue shortfalls.
Moreover, directives from the Ministry of Energy often clash with the realities faced by local operators and
communities. For instance, rural electrification targets are undermined by logistical barriers, inadequate
funding, and local resistance to tariffs that communities perceive as unaffordable.
The strength of the top-down approach lies in its ability to mobilise large-scale resources and enforce national
priorities, which is critical in post-conflict states like Sierra Leone that require strong central direction.
However, its limitations are equally profound: it neglects local contexts, assumes compliance, and often falters
when institutional capacity is weak. As Matland (2021) observes, top-down models are most effective in stable
environments with high institutional capacity, conditions that do not fully characterise Sierra Leone.
The Bottom-up perspective
In response to the rigidity of top-down models, the bottom-up perspective emerged in the late 1970s and early
1980s, associated with scholars such as Michael Lipsky and his concept of "street-level bureaucracy." This
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3709
perspective argues that policies are not implemented exactly as written; instead, they are shaped by the
discretion, capacity, and decisions of local actors, frontline workers, service providers, communities, and civil
society (Lipsky, 2020).
Key Assumptions and Features
Bottom-up models stress that:
i. Local Actors Matter Teachers, health workers, utility technicians, and local councils make real-time
decisions that shape outcomes.
ii. Adaptation to Context Policies must be interpreted and modified to suit local conditions.
iii. Participation and Engagement Citizens, NGOs, and communities play an active role in shaping
Implementation.
iv. Policy is Emergent Implementation is not a mechanical process but an evolving negotiation among
actors.
In energy governance, this approach emphasises decentralised electrification, community ownership of mini-
grids, and partnerships with local NGOs and private operators. Kenya’s Last Mile Connectivity Project and
Tanzania’s rural solar programmes exemplify bottom-up success by incorporating local participation and
private investment (Odarno et al., 2020).
In Sierra Leone, bottom-up dynamics are evident in rural electrification initiatives. Donor-supported projects
such as the Rural Renewable Energy Project (RREP) rely heavily on local councils, community-based
organisations, and private solar companies. These actors adapt national policies to local needs by engaging
communities in tariff design, training local technicians, and managing mini-grids. In some districts,
community buy-in has proven crucial for sustaining projects beyond initial donor funding.
However, bottom-up approaches also face limitations. Local institutions in Sierra Leone often lack technical
and managerial capacity, and community participation can be uneven. Without adequate support, decentralised
projects risk fragmentation, with some communities benefiting while others remain excluded. Moreover,
reliance on local actors may inadvertently reinforce inequalities if stronger communities attract more
investment than marginalised ones.
The strength of bottom-up models lies in their responsiveness, inclusivity, and capacity to build ownership.
They are particularly effective in fragile states where central capacity is weak but community resilience is
strong. Nevertheless, their limitations include vulnerability to local power dynamics, lack of standardisation,
and difficulties in scaling up. In Sierra Leone, bottom-up initiatives have shown promise but remain piecemeal
compared to the scale of national electrification needs.
The Policy Cycle Framework
The policy cycle framework, developed in the mid-20th century and popularised by scholars like Lasswell and
later Howlett (2020), conceptualises policymaking as a series of stages: agenda-setting, formulation, adoption,
Implementation, and evaluation. This model provides a holistic view of the policy process, recognising that
Implementation cannot be isolated from earlier and later stages.
The policy cycle assumes that policymaking is iterative, with feedback loops allowing for adaptation and
learning. Implementation is thus situated within a broader cycle where policies are continuously refined based
on performance and evaluation (Lasswell and later Howlett 2020).
In the energy sector, the policy cycle highlights the need for robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.
For instance, agenda-setting requires identifying energy access as a priority; formulation involves designing
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3710
technical and financial plans; adoption entails legislative approval; Implementation requires utilities and
agencies to execute plans; and evaluation ensures accountability and learning.
In Sierra Leone, the policy cycle is often disrupted at the implementation and evaluation stages. Policies such
as the NEAP set ambitious electrification targets; however, weak monitoring frameworks mean that progress is
poorly tracked. Evaluation reports, when available, are rarely integrated into subsequent policy cycles, leading
to repeated mistakes. For example, tariff reforms have been attempted multiple times without adequate
stakeholder consultation, resulting in public resistance and policy reversals.
The policy cycle offers clarity, critics argue that it oversimplifies reality by presenting policymaking as a linear
process. In practice, stages overlap, and political dynamics frequently disrupt rational cycles (Howlett, 2020).
In fragile contexts like Sierra Leone, external shocks, such as fuel price hikes or donor conditionalities - often
abruptly reshape policy priorities, making cycles less predictable.
Towards an Integrated/Hybrid Approach
Neither top-down nor bottom-up perspectives alone fully explain or address the complexities of policy
implementation. Increasingly, scholars advocate for hybrid approaches that combine central direction with
local adaptability, framed within iterative policy cycles (Peters, 2022).
Examples of Hybrid Approaches
i. South Africa’s Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (REIPPPP)
blends top-down regulation with bottom-up private sector participation and community benefit
schemes (Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021).
ii. Ghana’s electrification strategy combined central targets with community engagement and donor
partnerships, resulting in rapid expansion.
In the case of Sierra Leone, a hybrid approach is essential. Central government must provide clear national
direction, mobilise financing, and enforce regulatory standards (top-down). At the same time, local councils,
private operators, and communities must adapt policies to local realities and build ownership (bottom-up).
Embedding these processes within an iterative cycle of monitoring, feedback, and reform ensures continuous
learning and adjustment. Such integration could transform the implementation gap into an opportunity for
Implementation.
Policy implementation theories provide critical insights into why Sierra Leone's energy sector has struggled to
translate ambitious policies into effective service delivery. The top-down perspective highlights the importance
of central coordination but underestimates local realities. The bottom-up perspective effectively captures the
role of local actors, but struggles with issues of scale and capacity. The policy cycle framework underscores
the importance of feedback and learning, but risks oversimplification in fragile contexts. A hybrid approach
that combines central direction, local engagement, and iterative cycles offers the most promising pathway for
Sierra Leone to achieve universal energy access and sustainable service delivery.
Governance and Institutional Theories
Governance and institutional theories have become central to understanding the relationship between policy
formulation and performance outcomes in public administration. While policy implementation theories explain
how government intentions are translated into practice, governance and institutional theories delve deeper into
the structures, rules, and relationships that shape behaviour and decision-making within organisations. They
are particularly relevant in fragile states like Sierra Leone, where weak institutional capacity, limited
accountability, and political interference have often undermined reform efforts in critical sectors such as
energy (AfDB, 2023).
Governance refers to the mechanisms, processes, and traditions by which authority is exercised, including the
selection, monitoring, and replacement of governments, as well as the accountability of institutions (World
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3711
Bank, 2023). Institutional theory, on the other hand, focuses on how formal rules, norms, and informal
practices shape the behaviour of organisations and actors (Peters, 2022). Together, these perspectives provide a
powerful lens for analysing why ambitious reforms in Sierra Leone's energy sector have often failed to achieve
intended outcomes, and how systemic weaknesses can be addressed.
This section discusses three key strands of governance and institutional theory: institutional theory, principal
agent theory, and good governance/new institutionalism. Each is examined in detail, highlighting its
assumptions, strengths, limitations, and applications to energy sector reform, with particular emphasis on
Sierra Leone and comparative insights from other African contexts.
Institutional Theory
Institutional theory emphasises the role of rules, norms, and structures in shaping organisational behaviour.
Early institutionalists focused on formal institutions such as constitutions and laws, but “new institutionalism”
introduced by March and Olsen expanded the analysis to include informal practices, path dependency, and the
cultural embeddedness of institutions (Peters, 2022).
At its core, institutional theory suggests that organisations are not merely rational actors pursuing efficiency;
instead, they are constrained and influenced by the institutional environments in which they operate.
Institutions provide stability and predictability but can also create inertia, making reform difficult. In many
developing countries, institutions evolve through processes of isomorphism where organisations mimic
successful models from elsewhere, but often without the resources or capacities to make them work effectively
(DiMaggio & Powell, 2020).
In the energy sector, institutional theory emphasises how formal structures, such as ministries, regulatory
authorities, and utilities, are shaped not only by national laws but also by donor conditionalities, regional
agreements, and cultural norms. For instance, reforms that unbundle generation, transmission, and distribution
often mirror global best practices promoted by the World Bank and IMF but may not align with local realities
(Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021).
Sierra Leone’s energy sector exemplifies the challenges of institutional isomorphism. The unbundling of the
National Power Authority into the Electricity Generation and Transmission Company (EGTC) and the
Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA) in 2011 followed international reform models; however,
weak capacity and limited resources undermined its effectiveness. Regulatory agencies, such as the Electricity
and Water Regulatory Commission (EWRC), exist on paper but often lack autonomy, expertise, or political
backing to enforce their decisions.
Institutional path dependency also shapes outcomes. Decades of underinvestment, corruption, and civil conflict
created entrenched practices of rent-seeking and informal service provision. Even with new policies, these
historical legacies continue to influence energy governance. For example, informal electricity connections
remain widespread in Freetown, reflecting weak enforcement capacity and a social norm of bypassing official
systems.
Comparative African Insights from other African countries illustrate both the strengths and limitations of
institutional reforms. Ghana's Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) exemplifies how robust
regulatory institutions can foster accountability and consumer protection (Kumi, 2021). By contrast, Nigeria's
power sector reforms, despite multiple restructuring efforts, have been undermined by entrenched institutional
weaknesses, resulting in persistent inefficiencies and consumer dissatisfaction (Odarno et al., 2020). Sierra
Leone more closely resembles the Nigerian case, underscoring the need for institutional strengthening that
extends beyond formal structures.
PrincipalAgent Theory
Principalagent theory arises from economics and political science, focusing on the delegation of authority.
The principal (such as government or parliament) delegates tasks to an agent (such as a ministry, regulator, or
utility) who has more information about operations. This information asymmetry can create problems of moral
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3712
hazard (agents pursuing their own interests) or adverse selection (agents hiding relevant information) (Miller,
2020). The theory assumes that principals must design mechanisms, such as contracts, incentives, and
monitoring, to ensure that agents act in the principal’s interest. Where monitoring is weak and incentives
misaligned, agents may exploit discretion for private gain.
Energy governance is rife with principalagent problems. Governments rely on utilities to supply electricity,
regulators to enforce tariffs, and private companies to invest in generation. However, agents often pursue their
own agendas: utilities may underreport revenues, political elites may capture regulators, and private companies
may neglect service quality. The result is a persistent "performance gap" between policy goals and outcomes
(Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021).
Application to Sierra Leone, principalagent problems are evident at multiple levels:
i. The government, as principal, tasks EDSA with distributing electricity. However, EDSA often fails to
meet targets due to inefficiencies, revenue leakage, and corruption. Without adequate monitoring or
sanctions, the government struggles to ensure compliance.
ii. The EWRC is mandated to regulate tariffs and service standards, but is often subject to political
influence. This weakens its ability to enforce rules, allowing utilities and private operators to escape
accountability.
iii. International donors finance a significant portion of Sierra Leone's energy infrastructure. As principals,
they impose conditions, but once projects are implemented, local agents often divert resources or fail to
maintain systems. This dynamic explains why many donor-funded rural mini-grids become
unsustainable after initial funding ends.
Comparative African Insights, the principal - agent challenges are not unique to Sierra Leone. In Nigeria,
distribution companies often underreport their revenues to regulators, thereby exacerbating sectoral losses. In
Kenya, however, improved monitoring systems and customer feedback mechanisms have reduced information
asymmetries, strengthening accountability (World Bank, 2023). Sierra Leone could draw lessons from Kenya
by investing in digital metering, transparent reporting, and consumer engagement to mitigate principalagent
dilemmas.
The strength of principalagent theory lies in its clarity: it identifies information asymmetries and incentive
misalignments as the root causes of poor performance. However, critics argue that it overemphasises rational
self-interest and neglects cultural, historical, and institutional contexts (Peters, 2022). In Sierra Leone, weak
institutions and entrenched patronage networks complicate the principalagent dynamic, making simplistic
solutions inadequate.
Good Governance and New Institutionalism
The concept of good governance gained prominence in the 1990s as international institutions linked
governance reforms to development outcomes. Good governance is characterised by transparency,
accountability, participation, rule of law, and effectiveness (UNDP, 2022). New institutionalism builds on this
by recognising that institutions are not just formal rules but also networks of norms, practices, and power
relations that shape governance outcomes (Peters, 2022).
In the energy sector, good governance means that policies are formulated transparently, decisions are
accountable, citizens participate in consultations, and institutions operate effectively. Without these qualities,
policies may be captured by elites, exclude vulnerable groups, or collapse due to a lack of legitimacy. For
example, tariff reforms often fail if governments do not communicate transparently or engage stakeholders,
leading to resistance and reversals (Meadowcroft & Florini, 2021).
Sierra Leone's energy governance faces significant governance challenges. Decision-making is often opaque,
with limited consultation of citizens or civil society. Corruption and political interference undermine
accountability, while weak institutional capacity limits the effectiveness of these efforts. For example, tariff
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3713
adjustments are frequently politicised, with governments reluctant to raise prices even when necessary for cost
recovery. This undermines the financial viability of utilities like EDSA.
Nevertheless, there are positive signs. Recent donor-supported reforms have introduced results-based financing
models that tie disbursements to performance outcomes, incentivising greater accountability. Civil society
organisations are increasingly demanding transparency in energy projects, while digital technologies such as
prepaid meters enhance revenue collection and reduce opportunities for corruption.
In Ghana, good governance practices such as stakeholder consultations and independent regulatory oversight
have strengthened public trust in energy policies (Kumi, 2021). In contrast, Nigeria’s lack of transparency and
regulatory capture has fuelled public mistrust, undermining reforms. Kenya’s experience with public
participation in rural electrification projects demonstrates how inclusive governance enhances legitimacy and
sustainability. Sierra Leone can learn from these cases by embedding transparency, accountability, and
participation into its energy governance frameworks.
Implications for Sierra Leone
Governance and institutional theories together reveal why Sierra Leone’s energy reforms have
underperformed. Institutional theory highlights the persistence of weak and fragmented institutions shaped by
path dependency and external models. Principalagent theory explains how information asymmetries and
misaligned incentives undermine accountability between government, utilities, regulators, and donors. Good
governance theory underscores the lack of transparency, participation, and accountability in decision-making
processes.
Sierra Leone, the implication is clear: technical reforms alone will not deliver improved performance unless
institutional and governance weaknesses are addressed. A hybrid model is needed that:
i. Strengthens institutions by building capacity, autonomy, and accountability in agencies like EDSA and
EWRC.
ii. Reduces principal agent problems through digital monitoring, performance-based contracts, and
consumer feedback mechanisms.
iii. Enhances good governance by embedding transparency, participatory decision-making, and anti-
corruption measures into energy reforms.
Such a model would align with the broader conceptual framework of this study, where policy inputs (laws,
strategies, and financing) must be mediated through effective systems (institutions and governance
mechanisms) to produce desired performance outcomes (access, reliability, affordability, and sustainability).
Governance and institutional theories provide essential insights into the policyperformance nexus in Sierra
Leone’s energy sector. Institutional theory explains how formal and informal rules shape organisational
behaviour, often constraining reform. Principalagent theory illuminates the accountability challenges between
governments, regulators, utilities, and donors. Good governance and new institutionalism emphasise
transparency, participation, and accountability as prerequisites for effective service delivery.
Taken together, these theories suggest that Sierra Leone's energy sector will only achieve meaningful
improvements if governance and institutional reforms accompany technical and financial interventions.
Strengthening institutions, aligning incentives, and embedding sound governance principles are not peripheral
issues; they are central to ensuring that ambitious policies translate into real performance outcomes for
citizens.
Energy Transition and Innovation Theories
The global energy landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the twin imperatives of
achieving universal energy access and mitigating climate change. The transition from fossil fuels to renewable
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3714
energy sources is no longer optional but an existential necessity. At the same time, technological innovation
has accelerated the pace at which societies can adopt new energy systems, from distributed solar grids to
digital smart metering. Understanding these processes requires robust theoretical frameworks, among which
energy transition theories and innovation theories are central.
Energy transition theories - rooted in the socio-technical transitions and sustainability transitions literatures -
explain how large-scale systemic change occurs over time, often shaped by technological, institutional, and
social dynamics (Geels, 2021). Innovation theories, particularly the diffusion of innovations model, examine
how new technologies spread within societies, influenced by factors such as relative Advantage, compatibility,
and institutional support (Rogers, 2003; Sovacool et al., 2021). Together, these theories shed light on the
pathways through which Sierra Leone can move from its current state of energy scarcity and unreliability
toward a future characterised by inclusive, affordable, and sustainable energy service delivery.
This section examines the major strands of energy transition and innovation theory, as well as their application
to Sierra Leone's energy sector. It begins by exploring socio-technical and sustainability transitions, before
moving to innovation diffusion theory and the multi-level perspective on transitions. It then considers
emerging concepts of energy justice and just transitions. Comparative insights from global and African
experiences are integrated throughout, before concluding with implications for Sierra Leone.
Energy transitions are understood as shifts from one dominant energy system to anotherfor example, from
biomass to coal, from coal to oil, and currently, from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Socio-technical
transitions theory, as articulated by Geels (2021), posits that these changes are not purely technological but
involve the co-evolution of technologies, institutions, markets, user practices, and cultural meanings.
Transitions are therefore complex, non-linear, and often contested.
Sustainability transitions, a related strand, focus specifically on the transition toward low-carbon, resilient, and
equitable energy systems that align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 on
affordable and clean energy and SDG 13 on climate action (IEA, 2023). These frameworks recognise that
entrenched energy regimes - such as fossil fuel dependence - create lock-in effects, making transitions difficult.
Overcoming these requires disruptive innovation, policy interventions, and social acceptance.
In Sierra Leone, the sustainability transition is in its early stages of development. The country's energy mix is
dominated by biomass (wood fuel and charcoal), which accounts for more than 80 per cent of primary energy
consumption (AfDB, 2023). Hydropower provides some grid-based electricity, but climate change has made
the supply unreliable, while diesel generators remain costly and polluting. Renewable technologies such as
solar are emerging but remain marginal. From a socio-technical perspective, the challenge is not simply
introducing solar panels but building the institutional, financial, and cultural systems that enable their adoption
at scale.
Comparative African Insights from other African countries illustrate transition pathways. Kenya has emerged
as a global leader in geothermal and off-grid solar energy through sustained policy support, community
engagement, and private-sector participation (Odarno et al., 2020). South Africa's Renewable Energy
Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) illustrates how competitive procurement
and robust regulatory frameworks can shift a coal-dominated system toward renewable energy (Eberhard &
Gratwick, 2021). These examples suggest that Sierra Leone's transition must be systemic, involving reforms
across governance, finance, and societal acceptance.
Innovation Diffusion Theory
Everett Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations (2003) remains a foundational framework for understanding how new
technologies spread within societies. Rogers identifies five factors that influence adoption:
i. Relative Advantage the degree to which an innovation is perceived as better than existing
alternatives.
ii. Compatibility alignment with cultural values, experiences, and needs.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3715
iii. Complexity ease of understanding and use.
iv. Trialability the ability to experiment with the innovation before full adoption.
v. Observability visibility of results to others.
Diffusion occurs through categories of adopters, innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and
laggards, shaped by communication channels, social systems, and change agents.
In the energy sector, diffusion theory explains why some technologies, such as mobile solar lanterns, spread
rapidly in African villages, while others, like biogas digesters, struggle. Innovations succeed when they
provide clear advantages, fit local contexts, are easy to use, and are supported by trusted intermediaries
(Sovacool et al., 2021).
In Sierra Leone, diffusion theory helps explain the uneven uptake of renewable energy technologies. Solar
lanterns and home systems have spread relatively quickly in rural communities because they offer clear
advantages (lighting, phone charging), are compatible with off-grid lifestyles, and are easy to use. By contrast,
larger solar mini-grids have faced resistance due to high tariffs, limited community engagement, and perceived
complexity, with adoption stalling without effective change agents, such as local councils or NGOs.
Ghana's adoption of prepaid metering demonstrates how innovations can diffuse rapidly when they meet
consumer needs (affordable, transparent billing) and are supported by strong institutions (PURC). In contrast,
Nigeria's attempt to introduce smart meters has faced delays due to consumer mistrust and weak regulatory
enforcement (World Bank, 2023). Sierra Leone, building trust and demonstrating clear benefits will be crucial
for diffusing innovations such as smart grids and digital payment systems.
The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP), pioneered by Geels, is a widely applied framework for analysing
sustainability transitions (Geels, 2021). It conceptualises transitions as interactions across three levels:
i. Niches protected spaces where radical innovations emerge.
ii. Regimes dominant systems that stabilise existing practices, technologies, and institutions.
iii. Landscapes broader exogenous factors such as climate change, global markets, or political upheavals.
Transitions occur when niche innovations gain momentum, landscape pressures destabilise regimes, and
windows of opportunity open for change.
In the energy sector, solar mini-grids and home systems can be viewed as niche innovations. National utilities
and fossil-fuel-based systems represent the regime, while climate change and international financing shape the
landscape. The pace and direction of transition depend on how these levels interact.
In Sierra Leone, solar entrepreneurs and donor-supported mini-grids are niche innovations. EDSA and reliance
on biomass and hydropower dominate the regime. The landscape is shaped by climate change (which reduces
hydropower reliability), rising fuel prices, and international pressure for decarbonisation. The MLP suggests
that if landscape pressures intensify and niche innovations mature, the fossil-biomass regime could be
destabilised, opening pathways for renewables. However, without institutional support, niches risk remaining
isolated experiments.
Kenya exemplifies successful niche-to-regime shifts: off-grid solar, once a marginal technology, has become
mainstream due to policy support, private investment, and consumer acceptance. In South Africa, landscape
pressures (climate change, Eskom's crisis) are creating space for renewable niches to challenge the coal
regime. For Sierra Leone, international climate finance and donor support may exert landscape pressures, but
stronger domestic policies are needed to scale up niche areas.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3716
Energy transitions are not only technical but also social and political. The concept of energy justice emphasises
fairness in the distribution of energy benefits and burdens, recognition of marginalised groups, and
participation in decision-making (Jenkins et al., 2021). The related notion of a just transition stresses that shifts
away from fossil fuels must not leave workers, communities, or vulnerable groups behind.
In Sierra Leone, equity considerations are paramount. Urban elites often enjoy access to subsidised electricity,
while rural communities remain off-grid. Women and children bear the burden of biomass dependence through
health impacts and time spent collecting firewood. Energy justice frameworks demand that reforms prioritise
these groups, ensuring that transitions are inclusive.
South Africa's coal-dependent regions underscore the challenge of achieving just transitions: transitioning to
renewables must involve retraining workers and supporting affected communities. In contrast, Kenya's
renewable expansion has created new jobs in solar entrepreneurship, demonstrating positive justice outcomes
(Meadowcroft & Florini, 2021). For Sierra Leone, ensuring that rural communities, women, and youth benefit
equitably from renewable investments is essential for legitimacy and sustainability.
Global experiences demonstrate that transitions require sustained, long-term policy support. Germany's
Energiewende exemplifies how sustained subsidies, regulatory frameworks, and social acceptance can
collectively shift a system toward renewable energy sources (Sovacool & Griffiths, 2020). China demonstrates
how state-led innovation and scaling can rapidly transform energy systems.
In Africa, Kenya and South Africa are leading the way, while Ghana has made significant progress through
hydropower and distributed renewables. Nigeria illustrates the pitfalls of weak institutions, where reforms are
repeatedly announced but poorly implemented. Sierra Leone's experience more closely mirrors Nigeria's, but
with lessons to learn from Kenya's decentralisation and South Africa's hybrid procurement models.
Energy transition and innovation theories provide critical lessons for Sierra Leone:
1. Transitions are systemic Introducing renewables requires institutional, financial, and cultural reforms,
not just technology.
2. Diffusion requires trust Innovations must demonstrate clear benefits, align with local needs, and be
supported by credible intermediaries.
3. Niches must scale Donor-funded mini-grids and pilot projects must be mainstreamed into national
planning, supported by tariffs, financing, and regulation.
4. Justice is essential Transitions must prioritise rural, poor, and marginalised groups to ensure
legitimacy.
5. Globallocal alignment Sierra Leone must leverage international climate finance and regional
frameworks (ECOWAS, WAPP) while building domestic ownership.
Energy transition and innovation theories illuminate the pathways and challenges of moving from
unsustainable regimes toward renewable, equitable, and resilient energy systems. The socio-technical and
sustainability transitions perspectives emphasise systemic change; diffusion theory explains adoption
dynamics; the multi-level perspective highlights interactions between niches, regimes, and landscapes; and
energy justice underscores inclusivity. For Sierra Leone, these theories collectively suggest that achieving
universal access and sustainable service delivery will require more than importing technologies. It will demand
systemic reforms, institutional support, cultural change, and inclusive governance that ensures no one is left
behind.
Synthesis of the Theoretical Review
The theoretical review in this chapter has examined three significant theoretical strandspolicy
implementation, governance and institutional perspectives, and energy transition and innovation frameworks to
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3717
interrogate the policyperformance nexus in Sierra Leone's energy sector. Each theoretical lens provides
distinctive insights, but when taken together, they illuminate the structural, political, and systemic dynamics
that explain the persistent gap between policy ambition and service delivery outcomes.
Policy implementation theories emphasise the mechanics of translating policy into practice. The top-down
model explains Sierra Leone's tendency to adopt ambitious energy policies and reforms designed at the
national or donor level, such as the Electricity Act (2011) and the NEAP (2015). These reforms demonstrate
vision and commitment but often falter in execution due to limited capacity, resource shortages, and political
interference. The bottom-up perspective emphasises the role of local actors, NGOs, and communities in
sustaining initiatives, such as mini-grids, under the Rural Renewable Energy Project. Nevertheless, this
approach struggles with scale and uniformity. The policy cycle framework emphasises the importance of
iterative learning; however, Sierra Leone's cycles frequently stall at the implementation and evaluation stages.
Governance and institutional theories move the analysis from processes to structures. Institutional theory
explains how path dependency and institutional isomorphism have produced utilities and regulators that mirror
global models but lack the capacity to enforce reforms effectively. Principalagent theory highlights
accountability failures between governments, regulators, utilities, and donors, where information asymmetries
allow agents to shirk their responsibilities without consequence. Good governance frameworks underscore
deficits in transparency, participation, and accountability, which erode legitimacy and weaken reform.
Comparative cases, such as Ghana's independent PURC and Kenya's use of digital monitoring, illustrate that
governance quality, not merely policy design, determines performance.
Energy transition and innovation theories extend the analysis to the dynamics of systemic change. Socio-
technical transitions theory explains why Sierra Leone remains locked in a biomass-dominated regime, despite
niche innovations such as donor-funded mini-grids. The diffusion of innovations theory clarifies why some
technologies, such as solar lanterns, spread rapidly, while others, like community mini-grids, face resistance.
The multi-level perspective (MLP) situates Sierra Leone at a crossroads, where landscape pressures (climate
change, fuel volatility, global decarbonisation) could destabilise entrenched regimes if niche innovations are
scaled. Finally, energy justice reminds us that transitions must be inclusive, addressing ruralurban disparities
and gendered burdens of energy poverty.
The thesis emerging from these theories is that effective energy service delivery in Sierra Leone requires
structured, well-designed policies, strong institutions, and systemic innovation pathways. In this view,
ambitious reforms such as the NEAP or donor-supported projects are fundamentally sound; what is needed is
better Implementation, stronger governance, and scaling of innovations.
The antithesis, however, is that policy ambition alone is insufficient in a context marked by weak institutions,
entrenched informal practices, and deep inequities. Even technically sound reforms may collapse under the
weight of institutional fragmentation, political patronage, and social exclusion. Transition theories further
caution that innovation without justice can reproduce inequalities, benefiting urban elites while rural
populations remain energy poor.
The synthesis, therefore, is that Sierra Leone’s energy sector requires a hybrid governance and implementation
model that combines central leadership with bottom-up participation, embeds sound governance principles into
institutional reform, and supports systemic energy transitions that are both technologically viable and socially
just. The theoretical review highlights that energy reform is not merely a technical challenge but a
multidimensional process that demands coherence across policy design, institutional frameworks, and
innovation systems.
By articulating the intersections of these theories, this study is positioned to explore in the next chapter how
empirical evidence from Sierra Leone’s energy sector reflects these dynamics. The empirical review (Chapter
2.4) will provide comparative global, regional, and national experiences that further test and refine the
arguments presented here.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3718
Empirical Review
Empirical evidence provides the practical grounding necessary to complement the theoretical insights explored
in the previous section. While theory identifies the structures and dynamics that influence policy outcomes,
empirical research demonstrates how these dynamics play out in practice across various contexts. For the
energy sector, such evidence is significant because it highlights the successes and failures of reforms,
innovations, and governance arrangements in delivering reliable, affordable, and sustainable electricity.
This empirical review is organised into four levels - global experiences, African perspectives, West African
benchmarks, and the Sierra Leonean context. The aim is to situate Sierra Leone within broader patterns,
identifying lessons, best practices, and contextual challenges that can inform a new framework for service
delivery.
Global Experiences
Globally, empirical evidence shows that successful energy reform requires policy coherence, institutional
strength, and sustained investment. In developed economies, the energy transition has been facilitated by long-
term planning, consistent regulatory frameworks, and strong publicprivate partnerships.
Europe’s Energy Transitions, Germany’s Energiewende exemplifies how consistent subsidies, regulatory
clarity, and public support can drive rapid adoption of renewable energy. Between 2000 and 2020, renewable
electricity increased from under 10% to over 45% of the supply, supported by feed-in tariffs and grid
investments (Sovacool & Griffiths, 2020). Empirical evaluations, however, show that challenges persist in
terms of cost distribution and grid stability, highlighting the need for continuous adaptation (Geels, 2021).
Asia’s Renewable Expansion, China’s renewable energy boom illustrates the role of state-led innovation and
scale. By 2023, China accounted for nearly half of global renewable additions, facilitated by central planning,
technology investment, and supply chain integration (IEA, 2023). India’s experience demonstrates the
importance of decentralised solar: the Saubhagya Scheme electrified over 26 million households between 2017
and 2019, combining central funding with state-level delivery (World Bank, 2023).
Latin America’s Hydropower Dependence, Empirical studies of Brazil and Chile highlight both the potential
and vulnerabilities of hydropower. Brazil derives over 60 per cent of its electricity from hydropower, but
droughts have repeatedly disrupted the supply, prompting diversification into wind and solar energy (Pereira et
al., 2022).
Global Lessons, these experiences highlight three empirical lessons: (1) policy coherence and regulatory
stability are critical for investor confidence; (2) transitions require a balance of central leadership and local
adaptation; and (3) overdependence on single technologies, such as hydropower, creates vulnerabilities that
must be addressed through diversification.
African Perspectives
In Africa, empirical evidence reflects both persistent energy poverty and innovative reforms. Over 600 million
Africans lack electricity, and nearly 900 million rely on traditional biomass (AfDB, 2023). However, countries
such as Kenya, South Africa, and Morocco provide models of progress.
In Kenya, off-grid Solar Success - Empirical studies show that Kenya has become a leader in decentralised
renewables. Over 30 percent of households utilise solar home systems, which are supported by private
companies and microfinancing (Odarno et al., 2020). The government's Last Mile Connectivity Project
expanded grid access, while the private sector drove off-grid solutions. This demonstrates how bottom-up
adoption can complement national electrification goals.
In South Africa, Renewable IPPs, South Africa’s Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer
Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) has attracted over $15 billion in private investment, adding 6 GW of
renewable capacity (Eberhard & Gratwick, 2021). Empirical evaluations highlight the success of competitive
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3719
bidding, transparent regulation, and community benefit schemes. Nevertheless, challenges remain due to
Eskom's monopoly and political resistance.
In Morocco, Solar Megaprojects, Morocco’s Noor Ouarzazate Solar Complex is one of the largest in the
world, demonstrating how state-led investment, international finance, and public support can drive the
expansion of renewable energy. Empirical data indicate that Morocco has diversified its energy mix, thereby
reducing its reliance on imports and enhancing resilience (IEA, 2023).
Nigeria Persistent Challenges, despite reform efforts, Nigeria illustrates the pitfalls of weak Implementation
and governance. Studies show that distribution companies underreport revenues, theft is rampant, and
regulatory capture undermines reforms. As of 2023, over 80 million Nigerians still lacked access to electricity
(World Bank, 2023).
Empirical Lessons for Africa - Across the continent, empirical evidence highlights that progress is possible but
contingent on governance quality, financial innovation, and the integration of centralised and decentralised
solutions.
West African Benchmarks
Within West Africa, empirical studies highlight both best practices and cautionary tales that are highly relevant
for Sierra Leone.
In Ghana, Consistent Electrification Progress - Ghana's National Electrification Scheme, launched in 1989,
has increased access rates to over 80 per cent (Kumi, 2021). Empirical evaluations show that success was
achieved through grid expansion, rural electrification programmes, and consistent donor support. Importantly,
Ghana's Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) provided regulatory stability, ensuring that tariffs
were both cost-reflective and socially sensitive.
Côte d’Ivoire’s Hydropower Stability - Côte d'Ivoire has achieved near-universal electricity access, primarily
through investments in hydropower and the development of robust institutional frameworks. Empirical studies
indicate that the stability of its energy sector has contributed to industrial growth and regional electricity
exports (AfDB, 2023).
Senegal, Scaling Renewable - Senegal’s Plan Sénégal Émergent has expanded solar and wind, with empirical
evidence showing significant rural electrification gains supported by PPPs and donor finance (IEA, 2023).
Liberia and Guinea: Fragile Contexts - Like Sierra Leone, these countries struggle with fragile institutions,
high dependence on donor finance, and low access rates. Empirical studies indicate that while hydropower
projects, such as the Mount Coffee plant in Liberia, have improved supply, sustainability is compromised by
governance and financial deficits (World Bank, 2023).
Regional Integration through ECOWAS - The West African Power Pool (WAPP) illustrates efforts at regional
integration. Empirical evidence suggests that cross-border trade has improved supply reliability in some
contexts but remains constrained by weak infrastructure and regulatory misalignment (ECOWAS, 2022).
Empirical Lessons for West Africa - Benchmarks show that consistent policy direction (Ghana), stable
institutions (Côte d’Ivoire), and renewable scaling (Senegal) are essential, while fragile states like Liberia and
Sierra Leone struggle due to governance deficits.
Sierra Leone’s Energy Sector
Empirical data highlight Sierra Leone's persistent energy crisis. Less than 30 per cent of the population has
access to electricity, with rural access rates below 10 per cent (World Bank, 2023). Biomass accounts for over
80 per cent of primary energy use, reflecting a high dependence on wood fuel and charcoal (AfDB, 2023). The
grid is limited, fragmented, and unreliable, with frequent outages in Freetown and minimal rural coverage.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3720
The Electricity Act of 2011, NEAP (2015), and NREAP (2016) provide a framework for reform. However,
empirical evidence shows weak Implementation. EDSA continues to record losses exceeding 40 per cent due
to technical inefficiencies, unauthorised connections, and billing challenges. Tariff reforms are undermined by
political interference, while regulatory bodies such as the EWRC lack enforcement power (AfDB, 2023).
Donor projects, such as the Rural Renewable Energy Project (RREP), have achieved some success by
deploying mini-grids in rural areas. Empirical studies indicate that communities with local ownership and
training are more likely to sustain these systems effectively than those without (UNDP, 2022). However,
sustainability remains uncertain once donor funding ends.
Sierra Leone has significant renewable energy potential, particularly in solar and small hydroelectric sources.
Empirical assessments estimate that tapping even a fraction of this potential could transform access rates (IEA,
2023). However, barriers include financing gaps, weak institutional structures, and limited technical capacity.
Empirical evidence highlights stark inequities. Urban elites enjoy subsidised electricity, while rural
populations remain excluded. Women and children bear the burden of biomass dependence, with severe health
impacts. Without equity-focused policies, reforms risk entrenching inequality rather than alleviating it (Jenkins
et al., 2021).
Empirical reviews consistently highlight the gap between policy ambition and outcomes. Targets set under
NEAP and NREAP remain far from realised. Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms are weak, with limited
data collection and feedback loops. As a result, policies are often disconnected from the realities on the
ground.
The empirical review across global, African, West African, and Sierra Leonean contexts highlights a consistent
pattern: successful energy reform requires coherence, capacity, and inclusivity. Globally, countries that sustain
long-term policy direction and strike a balance between central leadership and local adaptation achieve
significant progress. In Africa, Kenya, South Africa, and Morocco demonstrate that innovation and governance
can overcome resource constraints. In West Africa, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire serve as benchmarks, while
Liberia and Sierra Leone illustrate the challenges of fragile states.
Sierra Leone, the empirical evidence reveals both persistent challenges and opportunities. While ambitious
policies and donor support exist, weak institutions, governance deficits, and inequities undermine performance.
Lessons from regional and global benchmarks suggest that Sierra Leone must strengthen governance, embed
equity, and harness renewable innovation to close the gap between policy ambition and service delivery.
Synthesis and Knowledge Gaps of the Literature Review
The literature reviewed in the preceding sections has provided conceptual, theoretical, and empirical insights
into the policyperformance nexus in energy service delivery. Collectively, these works highlight the promise
of ambitious reforms, governance innovation, and energy transitions. However, they also reveal the persistent
failures of fragile states such as Sierra Leone to convert policy intent into tangible outcomes. A synthesis of
the literature demonstrates areas of convergence where scholars broadly agree, points of divergence where
debates persist, and significant knowledge gaps that justify this study.
Across the literature, scholars converge on the idea that energy is a fundamental driver of socio-economic
development. Reliable and affordable electricity underpins industrial growth, human capital development, and
poverty reduction (World Bank, 2023; AfDB, 2023). There is also broad agreement that policy ambition alone
is insufficient; performance outcomes are shaped by governance quality, institutional capacity, and financing
mechanisms. Another area of consensus is the recognition that energy transitions are systemic. Scholars
highlight that transitions involve technological, institutional, and cultural change, not merely the introduction
of new hardware (Geels, 2021; Meadowcroft & Florini, 2021). Theories of innovation diffusion and multi-
level perspectives converge in underscoring the importance of scaling niche innovations, embedding justice
considerations, and aligning local adoption with global pressures. Finally, there is convergence on the need for
inclusive and equitable reforms. Studies emphasise that energy policies must address ruralurban disparities
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3721
and gender inequalities, ensuring that vulnerable groups benefit rather than being left behind (Jenkins et al.,
2021; UNDP, 2022).
First, scholars disagree on the relative effectiveness of top-down versus bottom-up implementation approaches.
Pressman and Wildavsky (2020) and Matland (2021) argue that clarity of objectives and central coordination
are decisive, particularly in resource-scarce settings. By contrast, Lipsky (2020) and Sabatier (2021) highlight
the discretion of local actors, emphasising that policy outcomes are determined mainly "on the ground." This
divergence is particularly relevant in Sierra Leone, where top-down reforms, such as the NEAP, clash with
bottom-up community electrification projects. Second, there are debates over the transferability of governance
models. Institutional theorists argue that global reform templates, such as unbundling utilities, often produce
isomorphic structures without addressing local path dependencies (DiMaggio & Powell, 2020). Others contend
that adopting international best practices can strengthen fragile states by aligning them with global norms
(Peters, 2022). This divergence explains why reforms in Sierra Leone, which mirror international models, fail
to achieve comparable outcomes. Third, scholars diverge on the pace and equity of energy transitions. Some
argue that rapid scaling of renewables is feasible with sufficient financing and regulatory support (IEA, 2023;
Sovacool et al., 2021). Others caution that without attention to justice and inclusivity, transitions may
exacerbate inequalities, privileging urban elites while rural populations remain dependent on biomass (Jenkins
et al., 2021).
The synthesis of convergence and divergence reveals several critical gaps in the literature that this study will
address:
1. PolicyPerformance Disconnect in Fragile States - while global literature highlights the importance of
policy coherence, little is known about why fragile states, such as Sierra Leone, repeatedly fail to
translate ambitious reforms into tangible outcomes.
2. Governance under Institutional Weakness - research on regulatory independence and good governance
is well-developed in stronger economies but sparse in fragile contexts where political interference and
weak capacity dominate.
3. Sustainability of Donor-Funded Interventions - although donor projects expand access in the short
term, their long-term sustainability in fragile states remains underexplored, particularly in terms of
community ownership and financial viability.
4. Equity and Justice Dimensions in Fragile Contexts - the global literature on just transitions is
expanding, but its application in countries like Sierra Leone remains limited, particularly in terms of
gender, ruralurban disparities, and social exclusion.
5. Integration of Hybrid Models - theories often treat top-down, bottom-up, governance, and transition
approaches separately. There is a lack of integrated frameworks that synthesise these insights for fragile
states where multiple pressures coexist.
The literature demonstrates both convergence and divergence on the determinants of effective energy service
delivery. Scholars agree that policy ambition, governance quality, and systemic transitions are critical;
however, they diverge on the relative importance of central control, local discretion, and the transferability of
global models. More importantly, significant gaps remain in understanding how fragile states, such as Sierra
Leone, can bridge the persistent policyperformance disconnect. Addressing these gapsthrough an
integrated, hybrid framework that embeds governance reform, innovation scaling, and equityconstitutes the
central contribution of this study.
Summary of Chapter Two
This chapter reviewed the conceptual, theoretical, and empirical literature underpinning the study of the
policy–performance nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy sector. The conceptual review clarified core constructs,
policy, performance, systems, and the nexus between them, while introducing the study’s conceptual
framework that links policy inputs, systemic variables, and performance outcomes.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3722
The theoretical review examined three strands of scholarship. Policy implementation theories highlighted the
limitations of top-down reforms in fragile contexts, the promise and challenges of bottom-up participation, and
the weaknesses of Sierra Leone’s policy cycle in generating feedback for iterative learning. Governance and
institutional theories explain how institutional path dependency, principalagent problems, and weak
accountability mechanisms undermine reform efforts. In contrast, comparative evidence from Ghana, Kenya,
and South Africa demonstrates how regulatory independence and good governance can strengthen
performance. Energy transition and innovation theories situated Sierra Leone within broader global and
regional dynamics, underscoring that transitions are socio-technical processes requiring systemic change, that
innovation diffusion depends on trust and local adaptation, and that equity and justice must be central to
reform efforts.
The empirical review contextualised these theories by drawing on global, African, West African, and Sierra
Leonean experiences. It revealed that while global cases, such as those in Germany and China, demonstrate
how consistent policy and investment drive transitions, African leaders, like those in Kenya and Morocco,
show that innovation and strong governance can overcome resource constraints. Within West Africa, Ghana
and Côte d'Ivoire serve as benchmarks for consistent electrification and institutional stability. In contrast,
fragile states like Liberia and Sierra Leone continue to struggle with weak capacity and governance deficits.
The synthesis highlighted convergence among scholars on the need for coherent policies, strong governance,
and systemic innovation, but divergence on the relative weight of top-down versus bottom-up approaches and
the transferability of global models to fragile contexts. Key knowledge gaps include the policyperformance
disconnect in fragile states, the sustainability of donor-funded projects, and the integration of equity and justice
into reforms.
Overall, the chapter established that Sierra Leone’s energy sector is characterised by persistent ambition
performance gaps, fragile institutions, and inequities in access. Addressing these requires a hybrid framework
that integrates policy ambition with governance reform, community participation, systemic innovation, and
inclusivity. This sets the stage for Chapter Three, which outlines the methodology for empirically investigating
these dynamics.
METHODOLOGY
Introduction
Every research project rests on a methodological foundation that gives credibility to its findings and provides
assurance that the conclusions drawn are both reliable and valid. For this study, which explores the policy
performance nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy sector, methodology is particularly critical. The sector itself is
marked by complexity, as energy supply involves multiple actors, including government ministries and
regulatory agencies, international donors, private operators, and end-users. Policies are ambitious and
frequently align with international best practices, yet performance outcomes remain modest, with low access
rates and persistent system failures.
Understanding why this gap exists requires a research design that captures both quantitative performance data
and qualitative insights into governance, institutions, and lived experiences.
The purpose of this chapter is therefore to explain how the research was designed to meet the objectives of the
study, answer the research questions, and address the problem statement. It begins by discussing the choice of
research design and philosophical orientation, before turning to the population and sampling approach, the data
collection instruments, and the techniques of Analysis. The chapter also addresses issues of validity, reliability,
trustworthiness, and ethics, and concludes with a reflection on the limitations of the chosen methodology.
Research Design
The study adopts a mixed-methods design, specifically a convergent parallel strategy. The choice is deliberate.
Energy policy research is not purely a matter of numbers or purely a matter of narratives, it is both. On one
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3723
hand, there are tangible performance indicators such as electricity access rates, affordability, frequency of
outages, revenue collection, and non-technical losses. On the other hand, there are equally important issues of
governance, institutional behaviour, and the perceptions of households and communities about service
delivery. A design that can integrate these two strands of evidence is therefore the most appropriate.
Mixed methods have been described by Creswell and Plano Clark (2018) as particularly suitable when neither
quantitative nor qualitative approaches alone can adequately capture a complex phenomenon. By employing a
convergent parallel design, this study collects both quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyses
them separately, and then integrates the results during interpretation. This approach enables the identification
of points of convergence, complementarity, and divergence. For instance, if survey results indicate widespread
dissatisfaction with tariffs, qualitative interviews may reveal the governance or communication failures
underlying this sentiment.
The strength of this design lies in its ability to strike a balance between breadth and depth. Quantitative
surveys provide generalisable trends across households, while interviews and focus groups offer rich,
contextual insights from policymakers, regulators, utility staff, and consumers. The main limitation of the
design is its demand on time, resources, and the researcher's capacity to work across different methodological
traditions. Though, given the study's objectives, these challenges are outweighed by the benefits of
comprehensive evidence.
Research Philosophy and Paradigm
Behind every methodological choice lies a set of assumptions about how knowledge is constructed. This study
is guided by pragmatism as its research paradigm. Pragmatism is particularly relevant for policy research
because it focuses less on abstract philosophical debates and more on what works in practice (Morgan, 2020).
It enables the researcher to leverage the strengths of both positivist traditions (with their emphasis on
measurement and objectivity) and interpretivist traditions (with their emphasis on meaning and context).
The central rationale for adopting pragmatism is that the research questions of this study require both objective
evidence and subjective interpretation. For example, the question of how far Sierra Leone has progressed
towards universal energy access is best answered through quantitative performance data.
However, the equally important question of why reforms have failed or why policies are not implemented as
intended can only be answered by engaging with the perspectives of those involved in the process,
policymakers, utility managers, and consumers. Pragmatism offers the flexibility to integrate these insights
within a single, coherent study.
Population and Sampling
The study population comprises all stakeholders in Sierra Leone's energy sector. This includes policymakers in
the Ministry of Energy and Ministry of Finance, regulators in the Electricity and Water Regulatory
Commission (EWRC), operators such as the Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA) and the
Electricity Generation and Transmission Company (EGTC), international development partners such as the
World Bank, AfDB, and UNDP, private renewable energy firms, civil society organisations, and consumers
both in urban and rural areas.
Because the study focuses on a wide range of actors, a combination of purposive sampling and stratified
random sampling is employed. For the qualitative strand, purposive sampling identifies those actors who are
best positioned to provide insight into energy policy and performance. Around 2530 interviews are planned
with key informants, including senior officials, donor representatives, private sector leaders, and civil society
actors. Focus group discussions (FGDs) are also conducted in selected rural communities to capture collective
experiences with mini-grids and solar home systems.
For the quantitative strand, a household survey targets approximately 400 households. The sample is stratified
to ensure Representation from both urban centres, such as Freetown, Bo, and Kenema, and rural districts where
access remains extremely low. The sample size of 400 households is derived from Krejcie and Morgan's
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3724
formula for determining sample size, which provides a 95% confidence level with a margin of error of ±5%.
Stratification ensures that ruralurban disparities, gender dynamics, and socio-economic differences are
captured.
Data Sources and Collection Methods
Primary data forms the backbone of the study. These are collected through:
i. Household Surveys, which gather information on electricity access, affordability, reliability,
satisfaction, coping strategies, and perceptions of government performance.
ii. Semi-structured interviews with policymakers, regulators, utility officials, donor representatives,
private entrepreneurs, and civil society leaders. These interviews explore policy formulation,
governance constraints, financing models, and reform challenges.
iii. Focus Group Discussions in rural communities to explore experiences with donor-funded mini-grids,
willingness to pay, and the inclusivity of reforms.
Secondary data complements the primary evidence. These include national policy documents such as the
Electricity Act (2011), the National Electricity Access Policy (2015), and the National Renewable Energy
Action Plan (2016). Performance data from annual reports of EDSA and the Ministry of Energy are analysed,
as well as regional and global reports from institutions such as the AfDB, IEA, UNDP, and ECOWAS.
Academic journal articles, working papers, and evaluation studies provide further context and triangulation.
The combination of multiple sources ensures that the study is not reliant on a single type of data, which is
particularly important in Sierra Leone, where official records are sometimes incomplete or inconsistent.
Data Analysis Methods
The Analysis proceeds in two strands: quantitative and qualitative.
Quantitative Analysis involves descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics are used to
summarise household data on access, affordability, and satisfaction. Inferential techniques, such as cross-
tabulations and regression analysis, are employed to explore the relationships between policy interventions
(e.g., tariff reforms) and performance outcomes (e.g., revenue collection or access rates). Benchmarking is also
used to compare Sierra Leone's indicators with those of regional peers such as Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, and
Senegal.
Qualitative Analysis follows a thematic approach. Interviews and focus group transcripts are coded inductively
to identify recurring themes such as governance bottlenecks, institutional weaknesses, donor dependency, and
community perspectives. Thematic Analysis allows for the emergence of insights that may not have been
anticipated in advance. NVivo software may be used to facilitate coding, but manual techniques are also
applied to ensure familiarity with the data.
Integration of Findings occurs at the interpretation stage. Quantitative and qualitative results are compared to
identify areas of convergence and divergence. For instance, if quantitative data reveal high levels of
dissatisfaction with EDSA's services, qualitative interviews may provide insight into the institutional and
political reasons behind that dissatisfaction. This integration enhances the robustness of the findings.
Validity, Reliability, and Trustworthiness
Ensuring validity and reliability is essential for the credibility of any study. For the quantitative strand, the
survey instrument is pre-tested to refine questions and minimise ambiguity. Cronbach’s alpha is calculated to
assess the internal consistency of multi-item scales, with values above 0.7 considered acceptable.
Randomisation in household selection reduces sampling bias.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3725
For the qualitative strand, the criteria of credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability are
applied (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Nowell et al., 2021). Credibility is enhanced through member checking, where
participants review and verify the accuracy of interview summaries. Dependability is supported by maintaining
a detailed audit trail of coding and Analysis. Confirmability is addressed through reflexivity, with the
researcher acknowledging personal biases and their influence on interpretation. Transferability is achieved by
providing thick descriptions of the context, enabling readers to assess the applicability of findings to other
fragile states.
Triangulation across multiple methods and sources enhances overall validity, ensuring that conclusions are not
reliant on a single dataset alone.
Ethical Considerations
Research in sensitive sectors such as energy requires strong ethical safeguards. This study adheres to the
ethical principles of respect, beneficence, and justice as outlined in the Belmont Report (U.S. DHHS, 2021).
Approval will be sought from the university's research ethics committee and the national research authorities
of Sierra Leone.
All participants are fully informed about the purpose of the study and their rights, and informed consent is
obtained before participation. Confidentiality is guaranteed by anonymising data and storing records securely.
Participation is voluntary, and respondents are free to withdraw at any time. Care is taken to avoid harm,
particularly in interviews with officials where political sensitivity may be high.
Limitations of the Methodology
No methodology is without limitations. In Sierra Leone, one key limitation is the weakness of official
records, which can constrain the reliability of secondary data. Resource constraints may also limit the number
of districts that can be covered by the survey. Elite interviews carry the risk of social desirability bias, as
respondents may underplay governance failures. Finally, logistical challenges, including transportation and
power outages, may also affect data collection.
To mitigate these limitations, the study relies on triangulation, transparent documentation of procedures, and
reflexivity to acknowledge potential biases. The combination of primary and secondary data also helps to
compensate for gaps in official records.
Chapter Summary
This chapter has explained the methodological choices underpinning the study of the policyperformance
nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy sector. A mixed-methods convergent parallel design, grounded in a pragmatist
paradigm, was adopted to capture both quantitative performance indicators and qualitative perspectives. The
research population comprises policymakers, regulators, utilities, donors, private sector actors, civil society
organisations, and households. Data are collected through surveys, interviews, focus groups, and document
analysis, and analysed using descriptive, inferential, and thematic techniques. Validity, reliability, and ethical
safeguards are prioritised, while limitations are acknowledged and mitigated.
By employing this methodology, the study is well-positioned to provide a rigorous, multidimensional analysis
of Sierra Leone’s energy reforms, explaining why policies often fail to translate into outcomes and how a new
framework might bridge this persistent gap.
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
This chapter presents and analyses the findings of the study based on primary and secondary data gathered to
examine the policy–performance nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy sector. The analysis is guided by the
objectives set out in Chapter One, which sought to evaluate the effectiveness of policy frameworks, assess
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3726
systemic and institutional constraints, analyse performance outcomes, explore the sustainability of donor-
supported initiatives, and propose a new framework for improving service delivery.
Data collection employed a mixed-methods convergent parallel design, as described in Chapter Three.
Quantitative data were collected through a household survey, yielding a 95% response rate and 380 valid
questionnaires out of 400 administered. These surveys captured the perspectives of households across urban
and rural districts, ensuring Representation of both grid-connected and off-grid populations. Complementing
the survey, Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were conducted with policymakers, regulators, utility officials,
donor representatives, and private sector actors. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were also held in rural
communities to capture collective voices.
Findings are presented thematically, organised around the research objectives, and integrate both numerical
data and narrative evidence. The chapter does not merely report results but analyses their implications in light
of the research questions and problem statement. The analysis reveals that, despite Sierra Leone's development
of ambitious energy policies, systemic weaknesses, governance deficits, and sustainability challenges have
hindered their practical implementation in service delivery.
Presentation of the Results and Findings
Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
Out of the 380 respondents, 52% were male and 48% female, ensuring a balanced gender Representation. The
majority (41%) were aged 2645 years, 29% were aged 1825 years, 21% were aged 4660 years, and 9%
were aged 61 years or older. Educational attainment varied: 27% had no formal education, 33% had secondary
education, and 28% had tertiary education, with the rest having only primary schooling. Occupations reflected
the national structure: 35% were farmers, 26% were traders, 18% were civil servants, 12% were students, and
9% were unemployed. Household size averaged 6 members, reflecting Sierra Leone’s extended family
patterns. Respondents were drawn from Freetown, Bo, Kenema, Makeni, Kono, and rural towns to ensure
regional balance.
This demographic profile is significant because it situates energy demand within a context where households
are large, incomes are modest, and education levels vary, influencing perceptions of Affordability, awareness
of policies, and the capacity to adopt renewable technologies.
Access to Electricity
Levels of Access
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3727
Survey findings revealed that 53% of households had some form of electricity access, while 47% had none.
Among those connected, 35% relied on the national grid (EDSA), 12% on donor-supported mini-grids, and 6%
on solar home systems.
This means nearly half of Sierra Leonean households remain excluded from modern electricity services. Rural
households were disproportionately affected, with 67% lacking any connection, compared to 29% in urban
centres.
Reliability of Access
The pie chart on the Reliability of electricity supply in Sierra Leone. It shows that:
i. 44% of households with Access receive only 58 hours of electricity daily.
ii. 28% manage just 04 hours, leaving them severely underserved.
iii. 19% experience 916 hours, while only 9% enjoy a near full-day supply.
The chart confirms that electricity access is not synonymous with Reliability. The majority of households
(72%) get less than 9 hours of daily supply, while frequent blackouts (reported by 71%) worsen trust in
providers. This undermines productivity, education, and welfare, creating a wide policyperformance gap.
Moreover, 71% of respondents reported experiencing more than 10 blackout days in the preceding month,
which undermines trust in service providers. FGDs confirmed that outages often disrupted evening schooling,
small business operations, and household welfare. A female trader in Bo explained:
“We pay for light, but half the time we use kerosene and candles because the current goes off.”
These findings confirm that despite ambitious national access targets, the performance reality is characterised
by unreliability and exclusion, reinforcing the policyperformance gap.
Affordability and Billing
Affordability emerged as a significant barrier to sustained energy access.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3728
Two pie charts capturing the affordability dimension of electricity in Sierra Leone:
1. Monthly Household Spending on Electricity
o 39% spend between Le 301,000 and Le 600,000 monthly, a heavy burden on average incomes.
o 26% spend more than Le 600,000, primarily urban, business-running households.
o 35% fall in other/lower spending brackets.
2. Perceptions of Affordability
o Only 7% of households consider their bills to be affordable/very affordable.
o A vast 66% see them as unaffordable/very unaffordable, while 27% remain neutral.
The findings highlight that Affordability is as critical a barrier as Access and Reliability. High tariffs relative
to income push households- particularly in urban business hubs - into energy poverty, reinforcing inequities
and weakening the sustainability of electricity provision.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3729
Reliability and Quality of Supply
Reliability indicators painted a worrying picture.
Three pie charts summarising Sierra Leone's reliability indicators:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3730
1. Frequency of Outages
o 49% face daily outages.
o 25% experience them weekly.
o 17% report monthly outages, and only 9% consider them rare.
2. Duration of Outages
o 33% last 14 hours,
o 29% last 512 hours,
o 21% extend beyond 12 hours.
3. Satisfaction with Reliability
o 68% of households are dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.
o 22% remain neutral.
o Barely 10% are satisfied.
These charts paint a stark picture of unreliability. Electricity is not only insufficient but also unpredictable;
frequent and prolonged outages undermine trust in providers, disrupt daily livelihoods, and exacerbate energy
poverty. Satisfaction levels are critically low, underscoring the urgent need for policy reforms, investment in
grid stability, and diversification into renewable energy sources.
Awareness and Perceptions of Policy
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3731
The three pie charts that capture the policy–performance perception gap in Sierra Leone’s energy sector:
1. Policy Awareness
o Only 32% of households were aware of policies like the National Electricity Access Policy (2015) and
the Renewable Energy Action Plan (2016).
o A striking 68% had little or no awareness.
2. Perceptions of Policy Impact
o 76% (45% disagreed, 31% strongly disagreed) felt policies had not improved services.
o Only 24% (16% agreed, 8% strongly agreed) believed policies made a positive impact.
3. Trust in Actors
o Highest trust was placed in donors (38%) and community projects (24%).
o Trust in government agencies (20%), utilities (14%), and the private sector (4%) was significantly
lower.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3732
These findings highlight a significant disparity between policy design and public perception. While ambitious
frameworks exist, weak communication, poor implementation, and service failures erode citizen confidence.
Trust gravitates toward external donors and local initiatives rather than state-led actors, highlighting the urgent
need for transparent reforms, inclusive communication, and credibility restoration.
The survey revealed that policy awareness was low (32%). Most households had only vaguely heard of
initiatives such as the National Electricity Access Policy (2015) or the Renewable Energy Action Plan (2016).
When asked whether policies improved electricity services:
45% disagreed, 31% strongly disagreed, 16% agreed, and 8% strongly agreed.
Trust in actors was also telling:
The bar chart illustrating public trust in different actors for electricity service delivery. Donors received the
highest trust (38%), while the private sector scored the lowest (4%).
i. Donors (38%)
ii. Community projects (24%)
iii. Government agencies (20%)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3733
iv. Utilities (14%)
v. Private sector (4%)
This reflects the credibility crisis facing state institutions. FGDs consistently associated progress with donor-
led mini-grids rather than government policies. One participant in Moyamba noted:
“We hear government promises on the radio, but here, only the donor solar project gives us some light.”
This confirms that policy ambition has not been internalised at the community level, undermining citizen
confidence in the state’s capacity to deliver.
Governance, Transparency and Accountability
The composite graph showing governance challenges in Sierra Leone’s energy sector:
1. Governance Issues
o 58% flagged billing transparency problems.
o 64% reported illegal connections in their communities.
2. Biggest Governance Problems
o Corruption (37%) was the leading issue.
o Followed by weak regulation (28%), political interference (21%), and lack of community involvement
(14%).
3. Government Performance Rating
o A striking 73% rated government performance as “poor.”
The governance challenge is structural, marked by corruption, weak oversight, and political capture, which
undermines trust, fuels illegal practices, and leaves citizens perceiving the government as ineffective.
Governance emerged as the central challenge.
58% said billing lacked transparency.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3734
64% reported illegal connections in their communities.
When asked to identify the biggest governance problem:
i. Corruption (37%)
ii. Weak regulation (28%)
iii. Political interference (21%)
iv. Lack of community involvement (14%)
Overall, 73% of respondents rated the government's performance in the energy sector as "poor."
KIIs reinforced this. Regulators at EWRC admitted limited independence and capacity:
“We are supposed to enforce fair tariffs, but political considerations override technical assessments. Until we
gain autonomy, our role remains weak.”
Utilities acknowledged high system losses due to theft and technical inefficiencies, but attributed them to weak
enforcement and a lack of investment. Donors complained of fragmented governance and inconsistent
coordination.
This evidence aligns with institutional theories, suggesting that weak governance and capacity deficits hinder
the translation of policies into results.
4.2.8 Energy Transition and Sustainability
Despite frustrations, optimism for renewable energy was striking.
i. 83% of households expressed a willingness to adopt solar or hydro energy if it were affordable.
ii. The desired support mechanisms included lower costs (64%), financing/credit (52%), and community
management (36%).
iii. However, 59% of respondents doubted the sustainability of donor-funded projects after the exit.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3735
FGDs highlighted failed donor projects:
“When the donor left, the mini-grid stopped working. Nobody came to repair it. We need training to manage it
ourselves,” noted a participant in Tonkolili.
KIIs with donors echoed this concern. A World Bank official explained:
“Without integration into national frameworks, donor projects remain islands of light surrounded by
darkness.”
This indicates that while communities are eager for renewable energy, sustainability requires institutional
ownership, regulatory clarity, and effective financing strategies.
Equity and Energy Justice
The findings underscored inequities in energy distribution.
i. 69% said urban residents benefit most, followed by businesses (19%). Only 12% believed rural
households benefit significantly.
ii. FGDs highlighted gender disparities. Women continue to bear the brunt of energy poverty, spending
hours collecting firewood and suffering from indoor air pollution.
“We women wake at 5 a.m. to gather firewood. If we had affordable electricity, our lives would be easier, and
our children could study better.”
This reveals that energy access is not only a development issue but a justice issue. Policies must address
structural inequities that leave rural communities and women behind.
Convergence and Divergence of Findings
Triangulating the data reveals apparent convergence and divergence:
i. Convergence: All groups agree that policies exist, but they fail in practice. Affordability, Reliability,
and governance are the main weaknesses. Donor projects are helpful, but they are unsustainable.
Communities favour renewables.
ii. Divergence: Policymakers stress ambition and donor dependency; utilities focus on financial losses;
regulators highlight weak authority; donors push for systemic integration; communities emphasise
lived realities of exclusion and injustice.
This divergence reflects the policyperformance nexus, top-down ambition versus bottom-up failure.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study offer a multidimensional perspective on Sierra Leone’s energy sector, highlighting
both the promise of policy ambition and the entrenched obstacles that hinder service delivery. They respond
directly to the research questions while reinforcing the central argument that the sector’s challenges are rooted
less in the absence of vision than in systemic dysfunctions, governance deficits, and unsustainable dependency
on donors. By examining the evidence through the lenses of policy implementation theory, governance, and
institutionalist perspectives, as well as the study’s conceptual framework, a more precise understanding
emerges of why policies often fail to translate into effective performance.
The first research question asked: How effective are Sierra Leone’s energy policies? Findings reveal that Sierra
Leone has no shortage of ambitious policies. From the National Electricity Act to rural renewable initiatives,
the country’s frameworks closely align with global aspirations, such as SDG 7 and the African Union’s
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3736
Agenda 2063. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these policies is undermined by weak implementation, poor
coordination, and limited monitoring. This aligns with policy implementation theory (Pressman & Wildavsky,
1984), which emphasises that the distance between policy design and policy delivery is often where failure
occurs. The rhetoric of universal access contrasts sharply with the lived reality of frequent outages and
inequitable distribution. The lesson here is that ambition is necessary but insufficient; institutional strength and
accountability are the decisive variables.
The second and third questions focused on systemic and institutional barriers to service delivery. The findings
of corruption (37%), weak regulation (28%), political interference (21%), and lack of community involvement
(14%) reflect governance deficits that go beyond technical constraints. According to governance theory
(Rhodes, 1996), public service delivery relies on accountability, transparency, and responsiveness. In Sierra
Leone, these attributes are weak. Utilities are not insulated from political interference, regulators lack
enforcement power, and corruption erodes both financial resources and public trust. From the standpoint of
institutionalism (North, 1990), the problem is not simply mismanagement but deeply entrenched institutional
weaknesses. For instance, corruption diverts resources that could strengthen service delivery, while political
interference undermines the autonomy of sector actors, such as EDSA and EWRC. Weak regulation allows
illegal connections and billing inefficiencies to thrive, undermining revenue generation and perpetuating
service unreliability. These structural dysfunctions confirm that the most significant barriers are institutional
rather than technical in nature.
The third research question explored citizens’ perceptions of affordability, reliability, and quality. The results
are stark: electricity is widely perceived as unaffordable, unreliable, and unfairly distributed. High tariffs,
frequent outages, and rural-urban disparities dominate the narrative. These perceptions align with equity and
distributive justice theory (Rawls, 1971), which emphasises that policies must not only exist but also yield fair
and inclusive outcomes. Where energy access is skewed in favour of urban elites, the legitimacy of the system
is undermined. Moreover, unreliable electricity deepens economic vulnerability. Households divert scarce
income to expensive alternatives such as diesel generators or kerosene, while businesses face production
disruptions. Schools and health facilities are similarly constrained, perpetuating intergenerational poverty and
inequality. Citizens’ perceptions, therefore, are not just subjective judgments; they reflect real socio-economic
consequences of poor governance and weak systems.
The fourth research question addressed the sustainability and inclusivity of donor-funded renewable energy
projects. Findings suggest that while donors have played a catalytic role in introducing solar mini-grids and
off-grid solutions, these projects often fail once external funding ends. The reasons, including a lack of
community ownership, inadequate integration into national frameworks, and insufficient training, highlight the
dangers of donor dependency. This aligns with dependency theory, which critiques reliance on external actors
for critical services. Donor-driven projects may provide short-term relief, but they weaken long-term resilience
if local institutions are not empowered to sustain them. Similarly, institutional capacity theory emphasises that
sustainability depends on strengthening endogenous institutions rather than perpetuating reliance on exogenous
support. Without local ownership and skills transfer, donor-funded initiatives risk becoming showcase projects
rather than systemic solutions.
A notable weakness of the study is that while it identifies corruption, weak enforcement, and political
interference as structural impediments, their direct impact on service outcomes has not been quantified. To
strengthen policy relevance, future research should establish measurable correlations, such as estimating
revenue losses from illegal connections, the percentage of outages linked to underinvestment caused by
misappropriated funds, or the delays in electrification targets attributable to political interference. Similarly,
reliance on secondary data in some areas, while pragmatic, highlights the need to strengthen Sierra Leone’s
statistical capacity and triangulate findings with administrative and utility-level datasets to ensure accuracy and
reduce overdependence on external sources.
Similarly, the proposed hybrid framework, although conceptually robust, remains broad and prescriptive
without detailed implementation pathways. To enhance applicability, it should be refined into actionable
strategies with measurable indicators, such as reductions in system losses, the addition of renewable
megawatts, affordability thresholds, and benchmarks for rural electrification. Financing also requires a deeper
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3737
exploration, moving beyond donor aid to innovative mechanisms such as publicprivate partnerships,
microgrid investments, blended climate finance, and results-based funding schemes. Community ownership,
local accountability systems, and capacity-building should be integrated to safeguard sustainability, while
lessons from regional best practices must be adapted carefully to Sierra Leone’s fragile governance realities.
Only through this combination of quantification, financial innovation, and contextual adaptation can the hybrid
framework transition from conceptual ambition to practical reform.
The discussion demonstrates that Sierra Leone’s energy sector is caught in a paradox. The country has
ambitious policies and donor support, yet citizens continue to experience unreliable, unaffordable, and
inequitable electricity. Breaking this paradox requires reimagining energy governance through the hybrid
framework proposed in this study: strengthening governance institutions, enhancing financial sustainability,
expanding renewable energy sources with local ownership, and embedding community inclusion.
Only through such a framework can Sierra Leone transition from rhetoric to reality, from dependence to
resilience, and from exclusion to inclusive and equitable access. This vision aligns with both the study’s
conceptual framework and broader theoretical insights, offering a pathway to bridge the gap between policy
ambition and service delivery performance.
Analysis
While the study sheds light on critical challenges, such as corruption, weak enforcement, and political
interference, it is necessary to go beyond descriptive accounts and rigorously assess their measurable impact
on service delivery. For example, corruption-related revenue leakages and illegal connections could be
quantified in terms of lost megawatts, reduced hours of supply, or financial shortfalls. Weak enforcement
could be correlated with non-revenue losses, while political interference could be analysed against tariff-
setting delays or stalled reform initiatives. Establishing these quantifiable links would not only strengthen the
evidence base but also provide policymakers with precise benchmarks for reform.
The reliance on secondary data in certain sections also warrants caution. In a context like Sierra Leone, where
statistical capacity is limited, overdependence on external reports risks creating inaccuracies or outdated
assumptions. To mitigate this, future research should triangulate secondary sources with administrative
records, utility-level datasets, and independent household surveys. Integrating such triangulated evidence
would enhance accuracy and credibility, while also capturing dynamic changes in energy access, affordability,
and governance.
The proposed hybrid framework is an important contribution, but it remains broad and prescriptive. To be
transformative, it should evolve into a sequenced roadmap with actionable strategies and measurable
indicators. For instance, monitoring reductions in system losses (targeting below 20% by 2030), tracking the
addition of renewable generation capacity (measured in MW), and setting affordability benchmarks (tariffs as a
percentage of household income) would translate the framework into a performance-based tool. Embedding
such metrics would enable policymakers, regulators, and donors to track progress systematically and
effectively.
Equally, the financing dimension requires greater depth. Sierra Leone’s fiscal constraints make it imperative to
diversify beyond donor aid. Innovative financing models, such as publicprivate partnerships (PPPs),
microgrids financed through blended capital, climate finance instruments, and results-based funding schemes,
should be explicitly integrated into the framework. These mechanisms not only mobilise private capital but
also align financial incentives with service delivery outcomes, ensuring sustainability.
The private sector’s role must also be strengthened beyond being a peripheral investor. Lessons from Ghana
and Senegal demonstrate that private utilities and independent power producers, operating under transparent
regulatory frameworks, can enhance efficiency, expand access, and alleviate fiscal burdens. In Sierra Leone,
well-structured PPPs, performance-based concessions, and renewable energy entrepreneurship could play
similar roles if supported by apparent regulatory oversight and risk-sharing mechanisms.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3738
To ensure resilience, the framework must also incorporate community ownership, capacity-building, and local
accountability systems. Evidence from rural mini-grids indicates that projects with community involvement in
tariff design, operations, and oversight tend to have longer lifespans and greater legitimacy. Building technical
capacity at the local level, combined with participatory governance structures, would reduce donor dependency
and foster sustainability.
Finally, regional comparisons must move beyond descriptive benchmarking. Rather than merely citing
successes from Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, or Senegal, it is important to critically evaluate how these lessons can be
realistically adapted to Sierra Leone’s fragile governance environment. For instance, Ghana’s success in
electrification was underpinned by a relatively stable institutional framework, while Côte d’Ivoire’s
performance-based contracts thrived in a stronger regulatory environment. Sierra Leone, with weaker
governance, must adapt these models pragmatically, scaling down their complexity, prioritising incremental
reforms, and embedding accountability at every level.
The analysis reveals that Sierra Leone’s energy sector requires more than policy ambition and donor projects.
It demands a recalibrated hybrid framework, one that is measurable, financially viable, inclusive, and
contextually adapted. By operationalising governance reforms, embedding financial innovation, fostering
private sector participation, and empowering communities, Sierra Leone can begin to transform ambitious
rhetoric into tangible performance outcomes.
Chapter Summary
This chapter presents and analyses data from household surveys (with a 95% response rate), KIIs, and FGDs.
The findings revealed:
i. Nearly half of household’s lack Access to electricity.
ii. For those connected, Reliability and Affordability are poor.
iii. Policy awareness is low, and trust in government is weak.
iv. Governance failures, corruption, interference, weak regulation, undermine delivery.
v. Donor projects offer short-term relief but often lack long-term sustainability.
vi. Equity issues persist, with rural and vulnerable groups left behind.
Ambitious policies fail to deliver due to systemic weaknesses and governance deficits. These findings set the
stage for Chapter Five, which synthesises conclusions and proposes a framework to bridge the policy
performance gap in Sierra Leone’s energy sector.
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Overview
Chapter Five provides a comprehensive synthesis of the studys key findings, linking them directly to the
research objectives and questions while situating them within Sierra Leone’s broader energy policy landscape.
The chapter begins by revisiting the central aim of the study, understanding the policyperformance nexus in
Sierra Leone’s electricity sector, and highlights how the findings confirm that policy ambition has not been the
sector’s core challenge. Instead, systemic weaknesses such as governance deficits, corruption, political
interference, weak regulatory enforcement, and utility inefficiencies emerge as the fundamental barriers to
performance.
The chapter then evaluates citizens perceptions of electricity affordability, reliability, and equity of
distribution, revealing widespread dissatisfaction with service quality and fairness. It also assesses the
sustainability of donor-funded renewable energy projects, noting that without strong community ownership,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3739
local capacity-building, and integration into national systems, these projects risk premature collapse.
Significantly, the chapter moves beyond diagnosis to propose a pragmatic framework for reform. This hybrid
approach emphasises strengthening governance and accountability, ensuring financial viability, expanding
renewable energy integration, and fostering community inclusion as the pillars for bridging the persistent gap
between policy intent and service outcomes.
Ultimately, Chapter Five positions the study as both diagnostic and prescriptive, underscoring the urgency of
addressing entrenched institutional and systemic challenges while providing a roadmap for transformative
change. By connecting evidence-based insights to actionable reforms, the chapter makes a strong case for how
Sierra Leone can transition from ambitious policy design to effective energy service delivery.
Summary of the Study
Chapter Five consolidates the core findings of the study and highlights their implications for Sierra Leone’s
energy sector. The chapter reaffirms that the country’s energy challenge is not rooted in a lack of policy
ambition; rather, it is the persistent gap between policy design and implementation that undermines progress.
While successive governments have launched bold initiatives to expand access, diversify energy sources, and
attract investment, weak governance structures, corruption, political interference, and ineffective regulation
have consistently eroded the potential impact of these policies.
The study’s findings further illustrate how systemic inefficiencies within the Electricity Distribution and
Supply Authority (EDSA) and other key institutions hinder service delivery. Issues such as non-transparent
billing systems, high levels of illegal connections, and political control over tariff decisions compromise both
revenue generation and customer trust. These governance and institutional deficits are compounded by
financial fragility, as subsidies and donor dependence continue to dominate the sector’s financing framework,
leaving little room for sustainability.
On the demand side, citizens overwhelmingly perceive electricity as unaffordable, unreliable, and inequitably
distributed. This dissatisfaction highlights the social dimension of the energy crisis, underscoring how
inadequate service delivery exacerbates inequalities and erodes public confidence in state institutions.
Similarly, donor-funded renewable energy projects, while valuable, have struggled with sustainability due to
limited community ownership, weak integration into national frameworks, and insufficient capacity-building
for local actors.
Against this backdrop, the chapter proposes a hybrid reform framework to bridge the policyperformance gap.
This model emphasizes four interdependent pillars:
(1) Strengthening governance and accountability to reduce corruption and political interference;
(2) Ensuring financial sustainability through cost-reflective tariffs, revenue protection, and innovative
financing models;
(3) Scaling up renewable energy deployment with proper integration and maintenance systems; and
(4) Fostering inclusive participation by empowering communities, civil society, and local institutions.
In conclusion, Chapter Five argues that Sierra Leone’s energy transformation requires a decisive shift from
rhetoric to results. By adopting reforms that integrate governance, finance, technology, and inclusivity, the
country can unlock the promise of reliable, affordable, and sustainable electricity. This summary highlights the
study’s contributions as both an evidence-based diagnosis and a prescriptive roadmap for policymakers,
regulators, donors, and communities committed to achieving universal energy access and long-term sector
resilience.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3740
Key Findings
Access
The findings revealed that 53% of households had some form of Access, while 47% remained excluded from
modern electricity services. Among those connected, the majority depended on the national grid (35%), with
smaller shares connected through donor-supported mini-grids (12%) and solar home systems (6%). Rural
urban disparities were pronounced: 67% of rural households lacked Access, compared to 29% in urban centres.
This confirms that access expansion remains uneven, despite ambitious national targets.
Reliability
Access did not translate into Reliability. 72% of connected households received fewer than nine hours of
supply per day, and 71% experienced more than ten blackout days monthly. Outages were often prolonged,
with 33% lasting 14 hours, 29% lasting 512 hours, and 21% lasting beyond 12 hours. Overall, 68% of
households were dissatisfied with Reliability, citing adverse effects on livelihoods, education, and welfare.
Affordability
Affordability emerged as a critical barrier. 39% of households spent between Le 301,000 and Le 600,000
monthly on electricity, while 26% spent more than Le 600,000, primarily urban, business-oriented households.
Nevertheless, only 7% described electricity bills as affordable, while 66% deemed them unaffordable or very
unaffordable. This highlights the burden of energy costs relative to incomes, effectively reinforcing energy
poverty.
Policy Awareness and Perceptions
Policy awareness was strikingly low; only 32% of households were aware of significant energy policies such
as the National Electricity Access Policy (2015) and Renewable Energy Action Plan (2016). Moreover, 76%
(45% disagreed, 31% strongly disagreed) felt policies had not improved services. Trust in actors was skewed
toward donors (38%) and community projects (24%), with much lower confidence in government agencies
(20%), utilities (14%), and the private sector (4%). This reflects an ongoing legitimacy crisis in state-led
interventions.
Governance
Governance was identified as the central challenge. 58% reported that billing lacked transparency, and 64%
noted the presence of illegal connections in their communities. The biggest governance concerns were
corruption (37%), weak regulation (28%), political interference (21%), and lack of community involvement
(14%). Ultimately, 73% rated government performance as poor, underscoring deep mistrust and institutional
weakness.
Conclusions
This study has examined the policy–performance nexus in Sierra Leone’s energy sector to identify the
underlying causes of persistent service delivery failures and outline a framework for reform. The evidence
gathered from households, key informants, and secondary data reveals a consistent theme: while Sierra
Leone’s energy policies are ambitious and aligned with international best practices, their implementation has
been undermined by systemic weaknesses. These include governance deficits, corruption, political
interference, inadequate regulation, and institutional inefficiencies.
The analysis confirms that the problem lies less in policy ambition and more in institutional capacity and
enforcement. Policies designed to expand access and improve service quality remain largely aspirational
because institutions tasked with implementation lack autonomy, resources, and accountability. For instance,
the Electricity Distribution and Supply Authority (EDSA) and the Electricity and Water Regulatory
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3741
Commission (EWRC) face significant political and financial constraints, reducing their ability to enforce
compliance and ensure efficient service delivery.
Citizen perspectives reinforce this diagnosis. The majority of respondents perceive electricity as unaffordable,
unreliable, and unfairly distributed. Widespread illegal connections, non-transparent billing systems, and
frequent blackouts further weaken public trust in both utilities and government institutions. Meanwhile, donor-
funded renewable energy projects, despite their potential, face sustainability risks due to poor local integration,
limited ownership, and weak capacity-building initiatives.
In short, the sector’s central challenge is not a lack of vision but the absence of credible systems to translate
vision into impact. Addressing this gap requires a holistic framework that integrates governance reforms,
financial sustainability, renewable energy expansion, and inclusive participation. Only by combining these
dimensions can Sierra Leone build an energy sector that is reliable, affordable, equitable, and sustainable.
Recommendations
Strengthen Governance and Institutional Accountability
i. Empower EDSA and EWRC with greater autonomy and capacity to regulate tariffs, enforce
compliance, and penalise malpractices without political interference.
ii. Establish annual performance audits and publish reports on revenue protection, losses, and corruption
to increase transparency.
iii. Introduce digital monitoring systems to track procurement, billing, and distribution in real time, thereby
minimising opportunities for manipulation.
Ensure Financial Sustainability
i. Transition toward cost-reflective tariffs that balance financial viability with affordability for vulnerable
households. A lifeline tariff structure should be maintained to protect low-income consumers.
ii. Expand innovative financing mechanisms, such as publicprivate partnerships (PPPs), green bonds,
and climate finance facilities, to reduce dependence on donor grants and subsidies.
iii. Improve revenue collection through prepaid metering, customer sensitisation, and anti-theft campaigns
that target illegal connections and billing fraud.
Scale Up Renewable Energy Integration
i. Mainstream renewable energy into national planning, ensuring that solar, hydro, and mini-grid projects
are integrated with EDSA’s distribution framework.
ii. Prioritise capacity-building for local technicians and communities to ensure maintenance, operation,
and eventual ownership of renewable energy systems.
iii. Align donor-funded projects with national strategies, requiring sustainability clauses that guarantee
training, technology transfer, and long-term funding models.
Foster Inclusive Community Participation
i. Engage civil society organisations, traditional leaders, and community associations in energy planning,
monitoring, and evaluation to build ownership and reduce resistance.
ii. Establish feedback and grievance mechanisms that allow citizens to report service failures, illegal
practices, and corruption, thereby strengthening accountability loops.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3742
iii. Expand energy access programs that specifically target rural areas, women, and youth, ensuring that
equity is at the heart of reform.
Promote Regional Integration and Resilience
i. Leverage the West African Power Pool (WAPP) to diversify supply, stabilise prices, and strengthen
Sierra Leone’s energy security.
ii. Develop strategies to mitigate external shocks, such as global fuel price volatility and climate change
impacts, through diversified energy sources and investment in resilient infrastructure.
iii. Adopt digital innovation, including smart grids and energy management systems, to modernise the
sector and improve efficiency.
The road to reliable and sustainable energy in Sierra Leone demands courage, commitment, and consistency.
This study concludes that reforms must go beyond technical fixes to address the political economy of energy
governance. Strong leadership, robust institutions, transparent financing, and citizen participation are
indispensable. If these recommendations are embraced, Sierra Leone can transform its energy sector from a
source of frustration into a driver of socio-economic growth, industrialisation, and national resilience. The time
for incremental adjustments has passed; what is required now is decisive action that turns ambitious policies
into tangible performance.
REFERENCE
1. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2022). African economic outlook 2022: Supporting climate
resilience and a just energy transition in Africa. AfDB.
2. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2022). West Africa economic outlook 2022: Supporting a
resilient recovery. AfDB.
3. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2023). African economic outlook 2023: Mobilising private sector
financing for climate and green growth in Africa. AfDB.
4. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2023). African economic outlook: Sierra Leone 2023. AfDB.
https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/west-africa/sierra-leone
5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd
ed.). Sage.
7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2020). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and
collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 45(2), 147160.
8. Eberhard, A., & Gratwick, K. (2021). Power-sector reform and regulation in Africa. Annual Review of
Environment and Resources, 46(1), 197224. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083429
9. ECOWAS. (2022). West African Power Pool: Regional electricity market development report.
ECOWAS Commission.
10. Geels, F. W. (2021). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven
criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 365398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.02.002
11. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Africa energy outlook 2023. IEA.
https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2023
12. Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2021). Humanising sociotechnical transitions through
energy justice: An ethical framework. Applied Energy, 281, 116117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116117
13. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational
and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607610.
14. Kumi, E. N. (2021). The electricity situation in Ghana: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy,
149, 112017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112017
15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3743
16. Matland, R. E. (2021). Synthesizing the implementation literature: Ambiguityconflict model revisited.
Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 301320.
17. Meadowcroft, J., & Florini, A. (2021). Global energy transitions and the future of energy governance.
Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101452
18. Miller, G. J. (2020). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge University
Press.
19. Morgan, D. L. (2020). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 14(1), 1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819898591
20. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet
trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 113.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211058707
21. Odarno, L., Sawe, E., & Sweeney, S. (2020). A systems approach to energy access: Africa’s power
sector challenges. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/research/systems-approach-energy-
access
22. Pereira, A. O., Silva, L. A., & Andrade, J. A. (2022). Hydropower vulnerability in Latin America under
climate change scenarios. Energy Reports, 8, 22192231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.029
23. Peters, B. G. (2022). The politics of policy capacity. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895615.001.0001
24. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
25. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.).
Pearson.
26. Sovacool, B. K., & Griffiths, S. (2020). The cultural barriers to renewable energy and energy efficiency
in the Middle East. Energy Policy, 140, 111426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111426
27. Sovacool, B. K., Turnheim, B., Hook, A., Brock, A., & Martiskainen, M. (2021). Aligning SDG 7 with
a just transition: Policy challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 156, 112476.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112476
28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and
guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. DHHS.
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report
29. World Bank. (2023). Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report 2023. World Bank, IEA, IRENA,
UNSD, WHO. https://trackingsdg7.esmap.org
30. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
APPENDIX
Annex A. Research Questionnaire
Study Title: Understanding the Policy–Performance Nexus in Sierra Leone’s Energy Sector
Section A: Demographic Profile
1. Gender: Male Female Other
2. Age: 1825 2635 3645 4660 61+
3. Educational level:
None Primary Secondary Tertiary Other _________
4. Occupation: Farmer Trader Civil servant Student Unemployed Other _________
5. Household size: ______ persons
6. District/Community: ______________________
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3744
Section B: Energy Access
7. Do you currently have access to electricity?
Yes (National Grid) Yes (Mini-grid) Yes (Solar Home System) No access
8. If no, what is your main source of lighting?
Candles Kerosene Firewood Torch/flashlight Other _________
9. On average, how many hours per day do you have electricity supply?
04 hrs 58 hrs 916 hrs 1724 hrs
10. In the last month, how many days did your household experience complete blackout?
None 15 610 More than 10
Section C: Affordability and Billing
11. What is your household’s average monthly electricity expenditure?
< Le 100,000 Le 100,000300,000 Le 301,000600,000 > Le 600,000
12. Do you use a prepaid meter?
Yes No
13. How affordable do you consider your electricity bill?
Very affordable Affordable Unaffordable Very unaffordable
14. Have you ever reduced electricity usage due to high cost?
Yes No
Section D: Reliability and Quality of Supply
15. How often do you experience power outages?
Daily Weekly Monthly Rarely/Never
16. When outages occur, how long do they typically last?
< 1 hour 14 hours 512 hours > 12 hours
17. How satisfied are you with the reliability of electricity?
Very satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied
18. Do power cuts affect your children’s schooling, business activities, or household wellbeing?
Yes No (If yes, explain briefly: ________________________)
Section E: Awareness and Perceptions of Policy
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3745
19. Are you aware of government energy policies (e.g., Electricity Act 2011, NEAP 2015, NREAP 2016)?
Yes No
20. Do you think these policies have improved electricity services?
Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree
21. In your view, are policies designed with community realities in mind?
Yes No Not sure
22. Who do you trust most to improve electricity service delivery?
Government EDSA/EGTC Private sector Donors Community projects
Section F: Governance, Transparency and Accountability
23. Do you consider electricity billing and tariff setting to be transparent and fair?
Yes No Don’t know
24. Have you seen or experienced illegal electricity connections in your community?
Yes No
25. In your opinion, what is the biggest governance problem in the energy sector?
Corruption Poor accountability Political interference Weak regulation Lack of community
involvement
26. How would you rate overall government performance in electricity service delivery?
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Section G: Energy Transition and Sustainability
27. Would you adopt renewable energy (solar, wind, mini-hydro) if it was affordable and reliable?
Yes No Not sure
28. What support would encourage adoption of renewable energy?
Lower costs Financing/credit Reliability Community management Training/awareness
29. Do you believe donor-funded projects (e.g., mini-grids, solar) can be sustained after donors leave?
Yes No Not sure (Explain briefly: ________________________)
30. Do you believe renewable energy can solve Sierra Leone’s electricity challenges?
Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree
Section H: Equity and Justice
31. Who benefits most from electricity services in your community?
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3746
Urban residents Rural elites General households Businesses Don’t know
32. Do you think women and vulnerable groups face more difficulties in accessing affordable electricity?
Yes No Not sure
33. What steps should government and partners take to ensure electricity is shared fairly?
____________________________
Section I: Open-Ended Questions
34. What are the three biggest changes you would like to see in Sierra Leone’s electricity services?
____________________________
35. If you could advise the government or EDSA directly, what would you recommend?
____________________________
Annex B: Measurable Indicators For Energy Sector Reform
This annex translates identified weaknesses in Sierra Leone’s energy sector into practical refinements,
measurable indicators, and 2030 benchmarks. It serves as a monitoring tool for the Ministry of Energy, EDSA,
EWRC, development partners, and private investors.
Table A1 Linking Weaknesses to Actionable Indicators
Weakness
Identified
Suggested
Refinement
Measurable Indicators
Target Benchmarks (2030)
Corruption, weak
enforcement, and
political
interference not
quantified
Quantify
direct impact
on service
outcomes
% of revenue lost due to illegal
connections and billing fraud
Number of politically influenced
tariff decisions per year
% of budget diverted/underutilised
due to corruption
Reduce non-technical losses from
35–40% to ≤15%
Zero political interference in tariff
adjustments
• Annual anti-corruption audit reports
published
Reliance on
secondary data
raises accuracy
concerns
Strengthen
data quality
through
triangulation
% of energy indicators verified by
independent surveys
Frequency of updated utility
performance reports
Number of administrative datasets
digitised
At least 90% of key indicators
validated annually
Quarterly performance reports by
utilities
Full digitalisation of billing and
customer data
Hybrid
framework
broad/prescriptive
Refine into
actionable
strategies
with metrics
System loss reduction targets
Renewable capacity added (MW
per year)
Rural electrification expansion rate
• Tariff-to-income affordability ratio
Losses reduced to ≤15% by 2030
250 MW new renewable capacity
added
85% national access; 60% rural
access
Electricity bills ≤10% of household
income
Financing
mechanisms
underdeveloped
Integrate
PPPs, micro-
grids, results-
based funding
Number/value of PPP contracts
signed
% of energy investment from
private sector
Results-based disbursements
At least 30% of sector financing
from PPPs
50% of off-grid electrification
through micro-grids
Results-based funds tied to ≥80%
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
Page 3747
linked to performance
project milestones
Limited role of
private sector
Strengthen
engagement
as service
providers
Number of independent power
producers (IPPs) contracted
Share of generation/distribution
managed by private sector under
regulation
40% of new generation capacity
from IPPs
At least 20% of distribution
managed by regulated private
operators
Weak community
ownership and
sustainability
Embed local
participation
and
accountability
% of mini-grids under community
management
Number of trained local
technicians per district
Community oversight committees
established
70% of rural mini-grids
community-managed
500+ technicians trained
nationwide
Oversight committees in every
electrified district
Regional best
practices
described but not
adapted
Assess
contextual
applicability
Number of regional lessons
adapted into national reforms
% of policy reforms benchmarked
against ECOWAS/WAPP standards
At least 5 best practices (e.g.,
Ghana’s PURC, Senegal’s PPP solar
model) adapted
Full compliance with
ECOWAS/WAPP integration targets
Note. This table was developed by the researcher based on study findings and regional energy sector
benchmarks.
Annex:3 Sierra Leone’s Energy Score Card