
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION (IJRSI)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
vs NIFTY 50. What this brings out is how speculative digital assets are, with variables such as
24/7 trading, decentralized governance models, and retail- dominated liquidity, causing periodic
large spikes in volatility, of which Solana’s 72.56% volatility from 2023 till 2024 is in stark
contrast versus NIFTY 50’s 9.38% volatility. Even though they showcase remarkably high returns
and diversification benefits (via low correlation with the NIFTY 50), investors should
acknowledge that there are large tail risks associated with them, which means they require proper
risk management techniques, e.g., hedging.
The study indicates to the regulators, especially SEBI and RBI, to act on crypto-equity spillovers
through coordinated global frameworks and well-informed investor education to limit retail
speculation. At the same time, this research poses a challenge to academia for the creation of
consistent metrics and hybrid datasets in order to reconcile the methodological differences of the
crypto and traditional markets. Although the NIFTY 50 remains the stable pillar that stimulates
economic growth, ultimately, when cryptocurrencies transform from the speculation of coin
interest to being viewed as institutional instruments, it is the fine balance of innovation while
avoiding danger that will allow these digital assets to become integrated into mainstream finance.
REFERENCE
1.
Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., et al. (2019).
Volatility transmission between cryptocurrencies
and traditional asset classes. Economics Letters, 177, 66–70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.008
2.
Corbet, S., Lucey, B., et al.(2019).
Cryptocurrencies as an asset class: An empirical assessment. Journal
of Alternative Investments, 22(2), 44– 57.
3.
Yi, S., Xu, Z., & Wang, G. J. (2018).
Volatility spillovers between Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
Applied Economics Letters, 25(10), 706–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1361003
4.
Urquhart, A. (2016).
Are cryptocurrency markets efficient? Evidence from volatility and return
predictability. Economics Letters, 148, 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019
5.
Bouri, E., Molnár, P., Azzi, G. et al. (2017).
Can Bitcoin hedge against traditional financial assets?
Evidence from volatility and correlation analysis. Finance Research Letters, 21, 39–45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.01.006
6.
Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016).
Is Bitcoin a better hedge than gold? A comparative analysis of volatility.
International Review of Financial Analysis, 47, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.06.006
7.
Gkillas, K., & Longin, F. (2020).
Cryptocurrencies and stock market volatility: A comparative analysis.
Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(12), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120330.
8.
Kim, A., & Kim, Y. (2020).
Investor sentiment and cryptocurrency volatility: Evidence from social
media. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 21(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2020.1734801
9.
Smales, L. A. (2021).
Cryptocurrency volatility and market sentiment: A comparative study. Journal of
Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030112
10.
Yi, S., Xu, Z., & Wang, G. J. (2018).
Modeling volatility of cryptocurrencies using GARCH models.
Applied Economics Letters, 25(21), 1496–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1436141
11.
Platanakis, E., & Urquhart, A. (2020).
Cryptocurrency volatility and portfolio diversification: A
comparative study. *Journal of Portfolio Management, 46*(4), 54–68.
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.1.150
12.
Fry, J., & Cheah, E. T. (2019).
Cryptocurrency market crashes: Evidence from volatility and liquidity.
Journal of Financial Stability, 44, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2019.100692
13.
Tiwari, A. K., Jana, et al (2020).
Volatility co-movement between Bitcoin and altcoins. Finance
Research Letters, 35*, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101300
14.
Baker, S. R., Bloom, et al. (2020).
COVID-19 and stock market volatility: A clustering approach.
*Journal of Financial Economics, 138*(2), 620–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.006
15.
Bekaert, G., & Wu, G. (2000).
The leverage effect in stock markets: International evidence. Journal of
Finance, 55(3), 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022- 1082.00242