19. Demir, F. (2022). Innovation in the public sector: Smarter States, Services and Citizens. Springer
Nature.
20. Farazmand, A. (2023). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance.
Springer Nature.
21. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. de. (2010). Stakeholder
Theory. Cambridge University Press.
22. Frimpong, K., & Wilson, A. (2005). Measuring Service Orientation of Service Delivery Employees.
23. Gabriel, A. G. (2022). Bureaucratic red tape in the Philippines. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1304–1311).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_3523
24. Garrick, A., Johnson, W. D., & Arendt, S. W. (2024). Breaking Barriers: Strategies for Fostering
Inclusivity in the Workplace. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i2/20799
25. Genari, D., & Macke, J. (2022). SUSTAINABLE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES AND THE IMPACTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT. Revista de
Administração de Empresas, 62. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034759020220505
26. Ghimpau, V. (2020). Incentives, rewards, and recognition - what really motivates a researcher? In
MDPI eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03928-315-6-11
27. Ghosh, S., & Srivastava, B. K. (2014). Construction of a reliable and valid scale for measuring
organizational culture. Global Business Review, 15(3), 583–
596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914535145
28. Guah, M. W. (2021). Handbook of Research on Innate Leadership Characteristics and Examinations of
Successful First-Time Leaders. IGI Global.
29. Henseler, J. (2020). Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Analyzing latent and emergent
variables. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Composite-Based-Structural-Equation-
Modeling/J%C3%B6rg-Henseler/9781462545605
30. IaCobucci, D. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90–98. - References - Scientific Research Publishing.
(n.d.). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2078858
31. Idrus, S. H., Sumartono, E., Wartono, W., Suharto, S., & Syahriar, I. (2024). Harnessing Digital
Transformation for Improved Public Service Delivery: Lessons from Global Administrative Practices.
Deleted Journal, 1(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.59613/k8s6s859
32. Jannah, L. M., Sipahutar, M. Y., & Hariyati, D. (2020). Public Information Disclosure: Mapping the
understanding of multiple actors in corruption-prone Indonesian provinces. Policy & Governance
Review, 4(3), 167. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i3.321
33. Jo, J., Chadwick, C., & Han, J. H. (2023). How the human resource (HR) function adds strategic value:
A relational perspective of the HR function. Human Resource Management, 63(1), 5–23.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22184
34. Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., &
Pramana, I. B. G. a. Y. (2024). Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of
Digitization Initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818
35. Marawu, N. M., Utete, R., & Zhou, S. (2023). Good governance as an economic driver for service
delivery: Lessons for the South African Government. International Journal of Management
Entrepreneurship Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 71–
93. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v6i2.1219
36. Masenya, M. J., & Mthombeni, A. (2023). Governance, Ethics and public service Delivery: the
ramifications of corruption. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability,
3(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v3i2.1893
37. Morales-Huamán, H. I., Medina-Valderrama, C. J., Valencia-Arias, A., Vasquez-Coronado, M. H.,
Valencia, J., & Delgado-Caramutti, J. (2023). Organizational Culture and Teamwork: A bibliometric
perspective on public and private organizations. Sustainability, 15(18), 13966.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813966
38. Neo, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Tummers, L. (2022). Core values for ideal civil servants:
Service‐oriented, responsive, and dedicated. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 838–862.
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13583