up-skilling to enhance their performance and by thus remain employed (Ali and Khan, 2023). According to
(World Bank, 2022), with the increased world of automation and artificial intelligence, those without the new
skills may become redundant in the nearest future. To remain employed, and to transit to their new roles in
employment, then M-Cs ecosystem are critical for those already in the labour market, and notwithstanding the
new entrants with traditional qualifications (Ali and Khan, 2023, p.1104).
The government of India has taken illustrious steps in introducing M-Cs in its educational system. Incidentally,
through policy makers and educational regulators has been carrying out significant transformation in higher
education landscape in order to enable the young graduates to be in step with rapidly technological
advancement and ever-evolving skill requirements and competencies to fill the gaps in the job market.
According to (Mahamuni and Raju, 2023), M-Cs have succeeded in democratizing education in India, for
example through M-Cs, there more access in education by the removal of the obstructions of location, religious
hindrances, gender inequalities, and socio-economic conditions barriers. However, India has to overcome
outstanding challenges interfering with the introduction of M-Cs; for instance: issues of credibility, security,
ecosystem, and quality assurance standards. To chart the way forward for smooth introduction of M-Cs, the
Indian government through The University Grants Commission (UGC) developed Guidelines for the
introduction of M-Cs commonly referred to as the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 (UGC, 2020). A
country like Malaysia has made strategic steps in in the introduction of M-Cs. For instance, according to (Che
Ahmat et al., 2021), the implementation of M-Cs in Malaysia includes two bold steps: credit transfer policy
and accreditation of prior experiential learning. The main purpose of introducing M-Cs is to advance
knowledge, skills, values and competencies. Moreover, the guidelines and policies require the M-Cs to be
developed based on-demand, industry driven, transparent, personalized, and out-come driven.
For most sub Saharan African (SSA) countries, they are stuck in the traditionally learning whereby
qualifications like degree, or a professional certificates are overpriced (Van de Laar et al., 2022). Undoubtedly,
M-Cs presents a bright future and promise for Sub-SSA. However hindrances and challenges such as: lack of
understanding about the benefits of M-Cs, lack of adequate resources, weak infrastructure, inadequate policies
and regulatory bodies. According to (Manyukwe, 2024), a survey was carried in 28 selected African countries
about the introduction of M-Cs. The findings showed that despite knowledge about profitability of introducing
M-Cs in higher education, the M-Cs were only offered by the TVET.
micro-credentials has established that they are offered mostly by technical and vocational education and
training (TVET) colleges, followed by higher education institutions, with respondents saying there is strong
consensus on the importance of developing a common continental approach.
The process and experience of introduction of the M-Cs in the SSA varies from one country to the other. For
example, in Tanzania, the possibility of introducing M-Cs id rife, for example, both educators and students are
optimistically looking forward for the introduction of the M-Cs. However, most of the universities in Tanzania
are yet to introduce M-Cs (.Moreover, Tanzania is yet to put in place the relevant infrastructure, relevant
policies, and technologies needed for the introduction of M-Cs (Ghasia et al., 2019). The government of South
Africa has popularized M-Cs as foundational and innovative ways for the development and recognition of
youth skills.
In Kenya, Technical and Vocational Education and Training Authority (TVETA) is recognized as a State
Corporation, placed under the Ministry of Education established. The regulation and promotion of quality
technical and vocation and training, and assurance of equitable access by the Kenyan citizens has been placed
under the mandate of the TVET Act of 2013. For less than a decade, the growth of TVET institutions in Kenya
is phenomenal. For example, between 2013 and 2022, the number or TVET institutions have grown from 753
to 2,401 (Amubi and Kipkirui, 2023). One of the notable gaps so far as far as TVET is concerned is that it
cannot be equal to introduction of M-Cs. While TVET programme is more focused on impartation of skills and
competencies unlike in the traditional educational system; both are also keen on certificates, diplomas and
degrees. They also have clear timelines ranging from a year, to three or more years depending on the
profession (Ali and Khan, 2023). Therefore, the ecosystem of M-Cs in Kenya like in most developing
countries is still at its infancy state. In that regard, there is lack of a national policy that communicates a
harmonized and coherent framework (Maina et al., 2022). For example, currently there is no common