INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VI, June 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 19
Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete (SCGC) represents a major breakthrough in sustainable and high-performance
construction. Future research should concentrate on refining mix formulations, developing self-healing SCGC, and exploring its
potential in 3D printing technology (Nuruzzaman et al., 2020).
SCGC, which incorporates ultrafine slag, copper slag, and recycled aggregates, provides a cost-effective and eco-friendly alternative
to traditional concrete. Its superior mechanical strength, durability, and flowability make it an excellent choice for infrastructure,
precast concrete, and marine applications (Sherwani et al., 2022).
The adoption of SCGC in the construction industry can significantly lower carbon emissions, enhance resource efficiency, and
contribute to global sustainability initiatives (Arunachelam et al., 2022).
The incorporation of steel slag and copper slag in concrete demonstrates an innovative approach to sustainable construction material
development. Further research should focus on refining mix designs, improving durability, and broadening applications in high-
performance and self-compacting concrete (Lye et al., 2015).
Utilizing slag aggregates enhances mechanical properties and durability while also reducing environmental impact by decreasing
landfill waste and sequestering CO₂ (Monkman et al., 2009). By adopting slag-based materials, the construction industry can align
with circular economy principles, leading to cost-effective and sustainable infrastructure solutions (Grubb et al., 2011).
The advancement of SCGC technology is expected to drive global sustainable construction practices. Future studies should explore
optimizing mix designs, self-healing SCGC, and 3D printing applications to improve both performance and environmental benefits
(Sherwani et al., 2022).
By adopting SCGC, the construction industry can achieve cost-effective, high-performance, and sustainable infrastructure solutions,
fostering the transition to carbon-neutral construction (Jeyaseela et al., 2024).
References
1. Rangan, B. V., “Studies on geopolymer concrete: Applications and future needs,” Indian Concrete Journal, vol. 82, no.
7, pp. 9–14, 2008.
2. P. J. M. Monteiro, S. A. Miller, and A. Horvath, “Towards sustainable concrete,” Nature Materials, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 698–
699, 2017.
3. J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, 2nd ed. Saint-Quentin, France: Institut Géopolymère, 1999.
4. M. Singh, “Utilization of industrial by-products in the production of geopolymer concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production,
vol. 190, pp. 607–620, 2018.
5. H. Okamura and M. Ouchi, “Self-compacting concrete,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–
15, 2003.
6. G. De Schutter, K. Audenaert, and P. Desnerck, Self-Compacting Concrete, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2009.
7. C. Onyelowe and D. Kontoni, “Sustainable geopolymer concrete incorporating industrial by-products: A review,”
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 4567–4582, 2023.
8. Sherwani, S. M. R. Nizamuddin, and J. P. Singh, “Advances in self-compacting geopolymer concrete: A review,”
Construction and Building Materials, vol. 315, p. 125685, 2022.
9. K. Arunachelam, B. Prakash, and R. P. Ramasamy, “Effect of industrial by-products in self-compacting geopolymer
concrete,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 58, pp. 453–459, 2022.
10. S. Saloni, H. P. Bhargava, and D. Patel, “Durability properties of geopolymer concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil
Engineering, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 04021067, 2021.
11. P. Kandhal and G. Hoffman, “Use of steel slag in hot mix asphalt,” National Asphalt Pavement Association Report, vol.
107, pp. 1–12, 1997.
12. S. Ahmedzade and B. Sengoz, “Evaluation of steel slag coarse aggregate in hot mix asphalt concrete,” Journal of
Hazardous Materials, vol. 165, no. 1–3, pp. 300–305, 2009.
13. C. Lye, M. J. McKay, and K. D. Hall, “Sustainable concrete materials incorporating industrial by-products: A
comprehensive review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 105, pp. 530–543, 2015.
14. J. Xu and J. S. J. Van Deventer, “Geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals,” International Journal of Mineral
Processing, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 247–266, 2000.
15. R. Van Jaarsveld, J. S. J. Van Deventer, and G. Lukey, “The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of
fly ash-based geopolymers,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 89, no. 1–3, pp. 63–73, 2002.
16. D. Hardjito, S. E. Wallah, D. M. Sumajouw, and B. V. Rangan, “On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer
concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 467–472, 2005.
17. M. Meesala, K. S. M. Kishore, and P. P. Reddy, “Mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete: A review,” Materials
Today: Proceedings, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 13594–13602, 2019.
18. H. Kumar and S. Bishnoi, “Steel slag as an alternative aggregate in concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol.
232, p. 117178, 2020.
19. M. Azad and A. Samarakoon, “High-performance geopolymer concrete: A review,” Journal of Materials Research and
Technology, vol. 11, pp. 3015–3035, 2021.