International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Submission Deadline-17th December 2024
Last Issue of 2024 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-05th December 2024
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-20th December 2024
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Managing Credit Risk in Lending Institutions: A Study of Access Bank PLC, Nigeria.

Managing Credit Risk in Lending Institutions: A Study of Access Bank PLC, Nigeria.

Dr. Ogechukwu Amina Ogu, Kingsley Abasili
Public Administration, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7477

 Received: 14 February 2023; Accepted: 31 March 2023; Published: 12 May 2023

ABSTRACT

The study investigated the roles of Fintech in managing credit risk in lending institutions: A Study of Access Bank Plc, Nigeria. The study was guided by two research questions. Descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study. The population of this study comprised all the staff of Access Bank Plc, Anambra State. The sample size for the study was 175 staff drawn using Krejcie and Morgan’s sample size determination table. The instruments utilized for data collection was a questionnaire titled “Roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk Questionnaire (RTMCRQ)”. The instrument was validated by three experts. Cronbach alpha method was used for reliability test of the instrument which yielded overall value of 0.81. Mean and standard deviation were used for data analysis. The findings of the study revealed among others that the roles of Fintech in managing credit risk in Access Bank include to: offer crowdlending service by connecting capital-seeking companies with investors who are willing to lend directly to businesses, facilitate crowdfunding to improve person-to person lending, provide alternative sources of finance to potential loan defaulters, provide online loan repayment advice, provide quicker loans through simplified lending process, provide digital platform that enhances savings for loan repayment, provide financial tips on credit management and offer mobile wallets services that enable individuals make payment. Based on the findings, it was recommended among others Fintech Companies should use mass media for awareness-raising on their various services and potential benefits to individuals and firms.

Keywords: Roles, Credit Risk, Lending Institution, Access bank

INTRODUCTION

The banking sector contributes to unemployment reduction and provision of credits for economic development of any nation. The commercial banks accept deposits and grant credit facilities to members of the public. Access Bank of Nigeria, Plc which belongs to the banking sector has remained one of banks known for excellent services in the country. Access Bank constantly renders numerous innovative services and operates in technological innovativeness, complex, uncertain and dynamic environment. Oke and Olawale (2018) pointed out that the fluctuating exchange rates, frequent changes in government policies and other factors beyond the sphere of influence of the financial environment contribute to risks in lending institutions.

            Risk is any hindrance or obstacle to attainment of an organization’s objectives. Kakiya, Mose and Rono (2019) asserted that risks represent the threats to the capacity of an enterprise to execute business plans and create customer value. Risk may not totally be avoided but can be controlled for smooth operation of an organization. Salaudeen, Atoyebi and Oyegbile (2018) noted risks are uncertainties which affect a company’s ability to achieve its objectives and may result in many interdependent outcomes either negative or positive. Risk is concerned with the likelihood of threating event occurring in an organization. Okoli and Okeke (2019) defined risk as the possibility of damage or any other negative occurrence that is caused by external or internal vulnerabilities; which may be avoided through preemptive action. The author added that risk is commonly associated with uncertainty, as the event may or may not happen. Financial institutions are confronted with various risks in which credit risk is one of them.

              Credit risk is the tendency of bank debtor to refuse or fail to service or repay loan accessed through lending institutions. According toUmar, Tijjani and Salisu(2022), credit risk is the refusal or incapability of debtors to pay as per the contractual agreement. Credit risk occurs, when bank debtors fail to meet the loan obligations which result in loss to the lending institutions. Adeniyi, Opeyemi, Kayode and Emeje (2021) asserted that the issue of credit risk in banks is of serious concern to the stakeholders and regulators because of the high levels of perceived risks resulting from default and loan loss. Odion, Yusuf and Shuaibu(2022) asserted that the main sources of credit risk include, limited institutional capacity, inappropriate credit policies, volatile interest rates, poor management, inappropriate laws, low capital and liquidity levels, massive licensing of banks, poor loan underwriting, reckless lending, poor credit assessment, laxity in credit assessment, poor lending practices, government interference and inadequate supervision by bank. Subsequently, Financial Technology (Fintech) is one of the crucial innovative mechanisms to mitigate the effects of risks on operations oflending institutions.

            The involvement of Fintech companies in delivering financial services to the banking sector help to respond to rapid changing expectations of customers. Ezenwa for, Adebayo and Okafor (2022) noted that Fintech company handles transactions such as transferring money, tracking loans, applying for a loan, or managing investments. Okoli (2020) averred that Fintech Company can reduce bank credit risk by providing alternative sources of finance to potential loan defaulters, thereby enabling them to offset their accounts with their banks. The author added that Fintech Company also provide alternative source of funds through its peer-to-peer lending and crowd-funding channels which can enable bank debtors gain access to credit to pay their loan. Similarly, Kyari, Waziri and Gulani (2021)noted that Fintech Company provides finance to both individuals and corporate bodies mainly in the form of crowdfunding and crowdlending, with the former facilitating person-to person lending and the later connecting capital-seeking companies with investors who are willing to lend directly to businesses. Fintech offer innovative devices that support online transactions in the banking sector. Adam and Yusuf (2020) noted that Fintech provide financial services of all kinds such as online transfer payment, online financial planning services and online lending and borrowing through peer to peer system among others. The authors added that the fintech offers digital payment options that operate both within and outside conventional banking payments systems. Muhammad, Abdulmalik and Shuaibu (2022) asserted that one remarkable feature of FinTech is its ability to ensure efficiency within the market and at same time keep transaction costs very low.Adam and Yusuf(2020) asserted that the development of Fintech is seen by banks as an easy option to adopt Fintech companies.

            Credit risk is one of the major threats to the success of commercial banks in Nigeria. Umar, Tijjani and Salisu(2022) noted that the credit risk can also be measured using non-performing loan profiles. Odion, Yusuf and Shuaibu (2022) asserted that non-performing loans are those loans that are not earning income and full payment of principal and interest is no longer anticipated, principal or interest is ninety days or more delinquent or the maturity date has passed and payment in full has not been made. The high levels of non-performing loans in lending institutions in Nigeria portray poor credit risks management. Umar, Tijjani and Salisu(2022) asserted that the presence of greedy debtors who often abandon their debt responsibilities in one bank only to contract new debts in other banks also contributed to the mess of non-performing loan. Adam and Yusuf (2020) pointed out that difficulties facing banks regarding Fintech adoption are less expertise, lack of awareness and distrust of bank customers. This background prompted this study.

Purpose of the Study

The main purpose of the study is to find out the roles of Fintech in managing credit risk in lending institutions: A Study of Access Bank Plc, Nigeria. Specifically, the study sought to

  1. Determine the roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank
  2. Investigate the constraints to the adoption of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank.

Research Questions

The following research questions guided the study:

  1. What are the roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank?
  2. What are the constraints to the adoption of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank?

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

The review of the related literature was done in this section.

Conceptual Clarification

Key concepts in the study are identified and clarified with a view to creating a synergy in the course of the discourse and to avoid ambiguities.

Financial Technology

            Fintech is an application of electronic information resources in rendering financial services. Similarly, Kyari, Waziri and Gulani(2021) defined Fintech as the use of software and modern devices to provide financial services of all kinds across. Suharti and Ardiansyah (2020) pointed out that Fintech companies make it easy for people to access financial services through online platform. Fintech companies perform financial transactions similar to that a bank such as funding, capital raising, lending and facilitating payments but differ form banks as their customers are not required to open an account with them to get financial services. Fintech Companies operate a digital financial market that brings together people who wish to provide fund and those who need the funds. Adam and Yusuf (2020) asserted that Fintech companies provide financing services to individuals and corporations in a number of ways, including crowdfunding and crowdlending. The authors added that in crowdfunding, Fintech facilities consist of face-to-face lending between individuals or companies, while in the case of crowdlending, Fintech platforms connect companies that are seeking for capital with investors who are willing to lend directly to businesses. The use of crowdfunding and crowd Lending services of Fintech companies to raise funds helps eliminate costs associated with hiring financial consultants. Fintech company collect and provide data such as financial tips, credit and investment opportunities to individuals.

Credit Risks

             Credit risk is failure of bank debtors to repay the principal and interest of the loan they collects on an agreed date. According to Anetoh, Nwadialor, Anetoh and Okeke(2021), credit risk is the delay of repayment on loan contract or the inability of a borrower to pay its debts, which can cause cash flow problems and affect a bank’s liquidity position. Credit risk is associated with financial losses induced by the default of bank borrowers. Erhabor and Ofiafoh (2020) pointed out that credit risk occurs when a borrower cannot meet his/her financial obligations or repays the loan contracted.

            One of the measures of credit risk is Non-performing loan. Non-performing loan is loss of funds due to loan defaults after 90 days of collection of the principal. Similarly, Adebayo and Oluwaremia (2017) noted that loan is nonperforming when payments of interest and principal are past due by 90 days or more. Okey-Nwala, Kenn-Ndubuisi and Wachukwu (2022) defined credit risk as the potential to lose an existing debt entirely or substantially in commercial banks. It is failure to principal, interest or both of loans collected from commercial banks. Ndubuisi and Amedu (2018) noted that managing of credit risk involves credit analysis, credit rating, credit classification and credit reporting.

Empirical Studies

            Adam and Yusuf (2020) conducted a study on an assessment of the level of adoption of financial technology by Nigerian Banks. Descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study.A set of structured questionnaire was administered on the population of 20 commercial banks in Nigeria categorised according to the level of authorization. Percentage was used for data analysis. The findings of the study revealed among others that the level of Fintech adoption in Nigerian Banks was average.

            Suharti and Ardiansyah (2020) investigated Fintech implementation on the financial performance of Rural Credit Banks. The population of the study comprised all the 58 rural credit banks in Banten province that were registered with the OJK. The secondary data used for the study was published financial reports. The result of the study revealed that the implementation of Fintech has positive impact on the financial performance of Rural Credit Banks

            Muhammad, Abdulmalik and Halima (2022) examined the impact of financial technology (Fintech) on financial service delivery of deposit money banks in Nigeria. Ex-post facto research design was adopted for the study. The study utilized annual reports and accounts of listed deposit money banks in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE).Mean and simple regression was used for data analysis. The result showed that mobile banking, internet banking and POS banking have significant impact on the financial service of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

 Descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study. The study was carried out in Access Bank in Anambra State. Anambra State is one of the thirty-six states in Nigeria. The population of this study constituted of all the staff of Access Bank Plc, Anambra State. The sample size for the study was 175 staff drawn using Krejcie and Morgan’s sample size determination table.

The instruments utilized for data collection were two sets of questionnaires titled ‘Enterprise Risk Management Questionnaire (ERMQ) and “Organizational Performance Questionnaire (OPQ). The instruments were validated by three experts. Test-re-test method was used for reliability test of the instruments. The copies of the questionnaires were administered to the staff of Access Bank Plc in Enugu State which outside the area of the study but share same characteristics. The data obtained were subjected to test of internal consistency using Cronbach which yielded overall values of 0.81.

            A total of 175 copies of the questionnaire were distributed and 167 were duly filled and retrieved indicating 95 return rates. This analysis thus based on the 167 returned copies of the questionnaires. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions. In taking decisions on the research questions, mean item rating of 2.50 and above was taken as agreement and any mean rating that falls below 2.50 was taken to indicate disagreement.

RESULTS

Demographic Profile of the Respondents

Table 1: Distribution of Respondents based on Gender

Gender Frequency Percentage (%)
Male 98 59
Female 69 41
Total 167 100

Source: Researcher’s Field Survey and Computation, 2022

Table 1 shows that the majority 59% of the respondents are males, while 41% of the respondents are females.

Table 2: Distribution of Respondents based on Age

Age Frequency Percentage (%)
20-40 125 75
41 and above 42 25
Total 167 100

Source: Researcher’s Field Survey and Computation, 2022

Table 2 indicated that the majority 75% of the respondents was between 20-40 years and 25% of the respondents were between 41 years and above.

Table 3: Distribution of Respondents based on Cadre

Cadre Frequency Percentage (%)
Management Staff 79 47
Senior Staff 66 40
Junior Staff 22 13
Total 167 100

Source: Researcher’s Field Survey and Computation, 2022

The result presented on Table 3 reveals that majority 47% (79) of the respondents are management staff, 40% (66) of the respondents were senior staff, while 13% (22) of the respondents are junior staff.

Results

Research Question One: What are the roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank?

Table 4: Mean and Standard Deviation Scores on the roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank

S/N Item statements   (N =167 )
Mean  SD Decision
1 Offer crowdlending service by connecting capital-seeking companies with investors who are willing to lend directly to businesses 2.98 1.07 Agree
2 Facilitate crowdfunding to improve person-to person lending 2.76 0.98 Agree
3 Tracking of loan 2.46 1.04 Disagree
4 Provide alternative sources of finance to potential loan defaulters 2.91 1.10 Agree
5 Provide online loan repayment advice 2.66 1.09 Agree
6 Analyze the profiles of credits to ensure that they are credit trustworthy 2.45 1.03 Disagree
7 Provide quicker loans through simplified lending process 2.83 1.12 Agree
8 Provide digital platform that enhances savings forloan repayment 2.63 1.05 Agree
9 Provide financial tips on credit management 2.71 1.16 Agree
10 Offer mobile wallets services that enable individuals make payment 2.56 1.00 Agree
Mean of Means 2.70 1.06 Agree

From Table 4, items 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 have mean scores above the cut off mean of 2.50 which indicated their agreement with the items as the roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank. On the other hand, the mean scores of the respondents for items 3 and 6 are below the cut off mean of 2.50 which indicated their disagreement with the items as the the roles of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk. The average standard deviation score of 1.06 shows that their responses are close and this indicates homogeneity in their responses. The mean of means of 2.70 which is above the cut off mean of 2.50 indicates that Fintech plays positive roles in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank.

Research Question Two: What are the constraints to the adoption of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank?

Table 5: Mean and Standard Deviation Scores on the Constraints to the Adoption of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank

S/N Item statements   (N =167 )
Mean  SD Decision
11 Insufficient awareness of Fintech products 3.21 1.08 Agree
12 Poor funding 2.86 1.11 Agree
13 Irregular power supply
14 Low level of trust in Fintech services 2.63 1.07 Agree
15 Shortage of digital infrastructure
16 Low level of technical-know-how 2.60 1.04 Agree
17 Absence of standard policy to guide their operations 2.53 1.14 Agree
18 High cost of Fintech software development 2.77 1.01 Agree
Mean of Means 2.77 1.08 Agree

Result from Table 5, the mean scores of respondents for all the items which above cut off mean score of 2.50 indicated agreement with the items as the constraints to the adoption of Fintech in managing credit risk in Access Bank. The average standard deviation score of 1.08 shows that their responses are close and this indicates homogeneity in their responses. The mean of means of 2.77 which is above the cut off mean of 2.50 showed that there are many constraints to adoption of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank.

DISCUSSION

            The result of the study indicated that that Fintech plays positive roles in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank. This is in line with the finding of Guo, Wei and Fang (2022) which revealed the adoption of Fintech has positive impact on reduction of credit risks. The roles of Fintech in managing credit risk in Access Bank include to: offer crowdlending service by connecting capital-seeking companies with investors who are willing to lend directly to businesses, facilitate crowdfunding to improve person-to person lending, provide alternative sources of finance to potential loan defaulters, provide online loan repayment advice, provide quicker loans through simplified lending process, provide digital platform that enhances savings for loan repayment, provide financial tips on credit management and offer mobile wallets services that enable individuals make payment.

            The result of the study indicated that there are many constraints to adoption of Fintech in Managing Credit Risk in Access Bank. These constraints are insufficient awareness of Fntech products, poor funding, irregular power supply, low level of trust in Fintech services, shortage of digital infrastructure, low level of technical-know-how, absence of standard policy to guide their operations and high cost of Fintech software development. This is in agreement with the finding of Adam and Yusuf (2020) which revealed that Challenges/constraints of adoption of Fintech by commercial banks include poor understanding/ acceptance and distrust of Fintech innovation, difficulty in finding reliable cooperation partners for Fintech innovation, lack of adequate information on Fintech, regulatory challenges, Lack of qualified personnel and lack of adequate finance for Fintech innovation in the bank

CONCLUSION

            Based on the findings, it is concluded that Fintech plays crucial roles in managing credit risks in Access Bank, Plc, Nigeria. Fintech is confronted with numerous challenges that adversely affect their roles in managing credit risks. The challenges were: inadequate funding, irregular power supply and absence of technical experts among others. The challenges create unfavourable atmosphere that undermine the smooth operations of Fintech in Nigeria. The roles of Fintech could be improved through tackling the challenges by creating awareness, improving funding and developing standard legal framework among others.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings, the following recommendations were made:

  1. Fintech Companies should use mass media for awareness-raising on their various services and potential benefits to individuals and firms.
  2. Cenrtal Bank of Nigeria should develop standard regulatory requirement for operation of Fintech in Nigeria.
  3. Fintech Companies should organize periodic training for their emeployees to up-date their knowledge, skills and technical experts in managing credit risks.

REFERENCES

  1. Adam, K.K., Bukar, Z.W., &Musa, G.G. (2021).Financial technology revolution and banks’ information and communication technology investment: Evidence from an emerging International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and  Development, 13(3), 283-303.
  2. Adam, K.K., & Yusuf, O.A. (2020).An Assessment of the level of adoption of financial technology by Nigerian Banks. African Journal of Science Policy and Innovation Management, 1(2), 118-130.
  3. Adebayo, A.O., & Oluwaremia, F. (2017).Relationship between credit risk management and the performance of Money Deposit Banks in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(2), 38-48.
  4. Adeniyi, A.M., Opeyemi, S,S,, Kayode, K.A., & Emeje, S.O. (2021),Credit risk and bank performance in Nigeria: A panel analysis approach. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, 2(1), 44-53.
  5. Anetoh, V.C., Nwadialor, E.O., Anetoh, J. C. & Okeke, G.N.(2021).Effect of credit and operational risk management on firm value of deposit money banks in Nigeria. African   Journal of Accounting and Financial Research, 4(1), 14-32.
  6. Erhabor, O.J., & Ofiafoh, E. (2020).Credit Risk and the performance of deposit money banks in Accounting and Taxation Review, 4(1), 46-62.
  7. Ezenwafor, E., Adebayo, R.O., & Okafor, E.G. (2022).Predictors of intention to adopt fintech among digitally active customers in Nigeria: online savings and investment platforms (OSIPS).Research in Business & Social Science,11(10), 180-190.
  8. Guo, Wei and Fang (2022).Fintech deployment, bank credit risk and performance: Evidence from strategic cooperation between Banks and Tech Companies. Journal of Financial Research, 508(1), 20-38.
  9. Kakiya, G.G., Mose, J., & Rono, L. (2019). Enterprise risk management practices and organizational performance. Does intellectual capital make a difference? Expert Journal         of Finance, 7(1), 39-48.
  10. Kyari, A.K., Waziri, B.Z., & Gulani, M.G. (2021).Financial technology revolution and banks’ information and communication technology investment: evidence from an emerging economy’. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 13(3), 283-303.
  11. Muhammad, S.N.I., Abdulmalik, A.Y.,& Shuaibu, H. (2022).Impact of financial technology (Fintech) on financial service delivery of deposit money banks in Nigeria. Sapientia Foundation Journal of Education, Sciences and Gender Studies, 4(2), 83-93.
  12. Ndubuisi, C.J., &Amedu, J.M. (2018).An analysis of the relationship between credit risk management and bank performance in Nigeria: A case study of Fidelity Bank Nigeria International Journal of Research & Review, 5(10), 202-213.
  13. Odion, B.R., Yusuf, A.A., & Shuaibu, H.(2022).Effect of credit management on profitability of deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Management, Social Sciences, Peace and Conflict Studies, 5(2), 345-359.
  14. Oke, M.O., &Olawale, I.W. (2018).Credit risk management and financial performance among deposit money banks in Nigeria: A case study of Zenith Bank Plc. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(4), 24-36.
  15. Okey-Nwala, P.O., Kenn-Ndubuisi, J.I., & Wachukwu, P.I. (2022).Credit risk management and the performance of Nigerian Deposit Money Banks. International Journal of Finance  and Market Research, 1(1), 92–95.
  16. Okoli, C.I., &Okeke, S.I. (2019).Assessment of suitable risk management practices adopted by owners of SME in Anambra State for institutional collaborations for business success in e- world. Nigerian Journal of Business Education, 6(1), 64-70.
  17. Okoli, T.T. (2020).Is the relationship between financial technology and credit risk monotonic? Evidence from the Brics Economies. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(9), 999-
  18. Salaudeen, Y.M., Atoyebi, T.A., & Oyegbile, B.A. (2018). Enterprise risk management and performance of selected listed consumer goods companies in Nigeria. Applied Finance   and Accounting, 4(1), 112-121.
  19. Suharti, E., & Ardiansyah, E.T. (2020).Fintech implementation on the financial performance of Rural Credit Banks. Jurnal Akuntansi, 14(2), 234-249.
  20. Umar, G., Tijjani, M.S. &Salisu, A.(2022).Effect of credit risk on financial performance of listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria, Gusau International Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(1), 49-65.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

2

PDF Downloads

123 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.