QbD Approach to Hplc Method Development and Validation of the Simultaneous Estimation of Sulbactum and Durlobactum in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form

Authors

Dr.D.Tirumala

Omega college of Pharmacy (India)

Basapuram Meghana

Omega college of Pharmacy (India)

Mothukuru Sainikitha

Omega college of Pharmacy (India)

Jakku Jansi

Omega college of Pharmacy (India)

Md Mamun Reja

Omega college of Pharmacy (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800133

Subject Category: Pharmacy

Volume/Issue: 12/8 | Page No: 1529-1543

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-08-21

Accepted: 2025-08-27

Published: 2025-09-13

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry consistently emphasizes the importance of product quality, safety, and efficacy. To enhance these aspects, scientific tools such as Quality by Design (QbD) and Process Analytical Technology (PAT) have been widely implemented. These approaches provide a systematic and science-based framework for pharmaceutical development and manufacturing, aiming to improve product understanding, process control, and ultimately, minimize risks while maximizing productivity and quality.
The QbD framework, initially developed for manufacturing processes, has been successfully extended to the field of analytical method development—a concept now termed Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD). AQbD applies the principles of QbD to ensure that analytical methods are not only fit for their intended purpose but also robust and reliable throughout the product lifecycle.
Regulatory bodies, including the U.S. FDA, have recognized the importance of QbD and released guidance documents specifically for its implementation in immediate-release and extended-release formulations. Moreover, the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) encourages the application of QbD principles through its guidelines Q8 to Q11, supporting its adoption in both formulation and analytical development.

Keywords

QbD ,Hplc ,Development ,Validation ,Simultaneous

Downloads

References

1. McLeod SM, Carter NM, Huband MD, Traczewski MM, Bradford PA, Miller AA. 2024. Sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibility test method development and quality control ranges for MIC and disk diffusion tests. J Clin Microbiol 62:e01228-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. IVATURI, RAMU; sastry, TManikya; Sunkara, Satyaveni (2019), “Development and Validation of Stability Indicating HPLC Method for the Determination of Impurities in the Sterile Mixture of Cefoperazone and Sulbactam”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Tamma PD, Immel S, Karaba SM, Soto CL, Conzemius R, Gisriel E, Tekle T, Stambaugh H, Johnson E, Tornheim JA, Simner PJ. Successful Treatment of Carbapenem- Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Meningitis with Sulbactam-Durlobactam. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2024 Apr 17:ciae210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Shapiro AB, Gao N. Interactions of the diazabicyclooctane serine β-lactamase inhibitor ETX1317 with target enzymes. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2020 Dec 10;7(1):114-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Tsou TL, Huang YC, Lee CW, Lee AR, Wang HJ, Chen SH. Simultaneous determination of ampicillin, cefoperazone, and sulbactam in pharmaceutical formulations by HPLC with β‐ cyclodextrin stationary phase. Journal of separation science. 2007 Oct;30(15):2407-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. El-Shanawani AA. HPLC determination of sulbactam, sultamicillin tosylate, cefaclor, ampicillin and cefoperazone in pharmaceutical preparations. Acta poloniae pharmaceutica. 1998;55(1):9-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. HAGINAKA J, YASUDA H, UNO T, NAKAGAWA T. Sulbactam: alkaline degradation and determination by high-performance liquid chromatography. Chemical and pharmaceutical bulletin. 1984 Jul 25;32(7):2752-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles