Moral and Ethical Responsibilities Among Nurses in Geriatric Healthcare Decision-Making: A Phenomeonological Study
Authors
University of Perpetual Help System DALTA – Las Piñas, Bacoor, Cavite (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800151
Subject Category: Nursing
Volume/Issue: 12/8 | Page No: 1701-1706
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-08-12
Accepted: 2025-08-21
Published: 2025-09-16
Abstract
This phenomenological study examined the moral and ethical responsibilities of nurses in geriatric healthcare decision-making in selected healthcare facilities in Davao, Philippines. Guided by Colaizzi’s descriptive method, in-depth interviews were conducted with eleven staff nurses who had at least one year of experience in caring for older adults. The study aimed to uncover how nurses navigate ethical dilemmas, interpret their professional responsibilities, and reconcile institutional policies with personal values and cultural beliefs. Participants were predominantly female (64%) and aged 35–44 years (73%), with most having 5–10 years of clinical experience. Analysis of the qualitative data generated seven key themes: (1) Ethical Principles in Geriatric Healthcare, (2) Ethical Dilemmas in Geriatric Practice, (3) Moral Responsibility and Ethical Reasoning in Nursing, (4) Institutional Support and Ethics Education, (5) Moral Distress and Emotional Labor in Geriatric Care, (6) Cultural and Contextual Factors in Ethical Decision-Making, and (7) Balancing Patient Needs with Personal Beliefs. Findings revealed that while nurses consistently applied ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, and justice, they frequently experienced tension when institutional policies conflicted with patient needs or family expectations. Moral distress was common, especially in end-of-life care, with nurses highlighting the emotional burden of ethically complex decisions. Cultural norms, personal beliefs, and religious values strongly shaped ethical reasoning, underscoring the need for culturally sensitive ethics education. The study concludes that ethical decision-making in geriatric nursing is a dynamic, reflective, and deeply personal process requiring sustained institutional support, targeted ethics education, and emotional resilience. Recommendations include integrating case-based ethics training, fostering reflective practice, establishing mentorship programs, and developing emotional support systems to mitigate moral distress among geriatric nurses.
Keywords
geriatric nursing, ethical decision-making, moral responsibility, moral distress, nursing ethics, cultural competence, phenomenology
Downloads
References
1. Beagleh, R. (2024). Moral sensitivity in end-of-life care: Cultural and religious perspectives in nursing. Journal of Nursing Ethics, 31(2), 145–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Beck, C. T., Cusson, R. M., & Gable, R. K. (2016). Secondary traumatic stress in nurses: Development and testing of the secondary traumatic stress scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(6), 1418–1427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Boltz, M., Capezuti, E., Fulmer, T., & Zwicker, D. (2008). The NICHE program: An evolving national geriatric nursing program. The Gerontologist, 48(6), 736–743. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Caren-Gutiérrez, E., & Rodríguez, M. (2020). Moral courage in nursing practice. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 177–188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Corley, M. C., Elswick, R. K., Gorman, M., & Clor, T. (2001). Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(2), 250–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Corpuz, J. C. G. (2022). Ethical challenges in the Philippine healthcare system: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Global Health Science, 4(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.35500/jghs.2022.4.e7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Epstein, E. G., & Hamric, A. B. (2009). Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 20(4), 330–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Feinsod, F. M., & Wagner, N. (2005). Ethics committees in healthcare institutions: Enhancing decision-making. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(2), 84–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hickman, S. E., & Wocial, L. D. (2013). Nurses’ perceptions of moral distress and ethical climate. Nursing Ethics, 20(6), 611–624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kim, K., Han, Y., & Kim, J. (2021). The relationship between moral sensitivity and patient-centered care in nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 53(4), 450–458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nathaniel, A. (2006). Moral reckoning in nursing. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 28(4), 419–438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Qu, M., Zhou, H., & Chen, X. (2024). Simulation-based ethics training and moral sensitivity in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 128, 105884. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Silva, M. C., & Andrade, P. R. (2021). Ethics education in nursing: Bridging theory and practice. Nursing Ethics, 28(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020939134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Van Bogaert, P., Clarke, S., Willems, R., & Mondelaers, M. (2012). Staff engagement as a target for managing work environments in nursing: Implications for burnout. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(9–10), 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. World Health Organization. (2020). Ethics and COVID-19: Resource allocation and priority-setting. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Knowledge and Attitude of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Organ Donation
- Cold Hip Bath Therapy for Labor Pain Management: A Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Women's Health
- Work Settings Utilizing the S.C.O.R.E Model on the Psychological Empowerment of Hospital Nurses in Cebu City
- An Assessment on the Quality of Life of PLHIV Residents in Digos City Barangays: Basis for Health Teaching Program
- Work-Related Stress and Its Psychodermatological Impact on Nursing Professionals