Enhancing Emotional Support in Critical Care Through Digital Family Interaction

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients often experience heightened emotional distress due to isolation and restricted family access, making digital family interaction a promising solution to bridge these emotional gaps. This study examined the perceived impact of digital family interaction on emotional support in ICU settings from the perspectives of patients, families, healthcare providers, and administrators. Employing a descriptive-quantitative correlational design, the research was conducted in selected hospitals in Tarlac City, involving 30 ICU patients, 30 family members, 20 healthcare staff, and 10 administrators selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using validated questionnaires and analyzed through descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation at a significance level of p < 0.05. Findings revealed unanimous agreement among patients and families that digital interaction reduced anxiety, loneliness, and fear while enhancing motivation and connectedness (mean = 5.00). Healthcare providers (mean = 4.88) and administrators (mean = 4.95) strongly affirmed its benefits. While patient demographics showed no significant association with perceived emotional benefit, staff position (p = 0.035), years of experience (p = 0.029), and administrators’ leadership roles (p = 0.015) were significantly correlated with perceptions. The study concludes that digital family interaction is universally beneficial in ICU care and recommends its institutionalization through structured protocols and leadership-driven policies.

ICU, digital family interaction, emotional support, telehealth, virtual visitation.

1. Alenezi, A. M., Albarrak, A. I., & Alfaraj, S. A. (2021). Roles of intensive care unit nurses in communication with patients’ family members: A mixed methods study. Journal of Family Nursing, 27(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840720964590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alipio, M. (2020). Predicting academic performance of college freshmen in the Philippines using psychological variables and expectancy-value beliefs to outcomes-based education: A path analysis. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aydın Er, R. (2024). Effects of visit restriction in the COVID‐19 pandemic: Experiences and perceptions of intensive care nurses. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brigham, E., Mancebo, J., & Moss, M. (2022). Family engagement in the ICU: Virtual visits and beyond. BMJ Open, 12(4), e055679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Conte, H., Dorell, Å., Wedin, E., & Eckerblad, J. (2023). In their absence: Intensive care nurses’ experiences of communicating and supporting relatives from a distance. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01559-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dhaliwal, S., & Jha, A. K. (2023). Leadership engagement and digital health integration: Impacts on patient-centered care and hospital reputation. Health Services Management Research, 36(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848231101234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kebapcı, A., & Türkmen, E. (2022). The effect of structured virtual family visits on the anxiety levels of patients and their relatives in intensive care units: A randomized controlled study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 70, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rose, L., Yu, L., Casey, J., & Meyer, J. (2021). Virtual visiting in intensive care during COVID-19: A qualitative exploration. BMJ Open, 11(6), e048854. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Xyrichis, A., et al. (2022). Virtual visiting in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A UK national evaluation. BMJ Open, 12(4), e055679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Knowledge and Attitude of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Organ Donation
• Cold Hip Bath Therapy for Labor Pain Management: A Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Women's Health
• Work Settings Utilizing the S.C.O.R.E Model on the Psychological Empowerment of Hospital Nurses in Cebu City
• An Assessment on the Quality of Life of PLHIV Residents in Digos City Barangays: Basis for Health Teaching Program
• Work-Related Stress and Its Psychodermatological Impact on Nursing Professionals