The Role of Non-Human Agency in Contemporary Literature: A Posthumanist Analysis

This research paper examines the role of non-human agency in contemporary literature through the lens of posthumanist theory. In an era defined by ecological crises, technological advancement, and the growing presence of artificial intelligence, literature increasingly reimagines agency as a distributed phenomenon that transcends human subjectivity. Drawing on the works of theorists such as Rosi Braidotti, Karen Barad, Donna Haraway, and Bruno Latour, the study explores how animals, machines, plants, environments, and even objects emerge as agential forces within narrative structures. Through close readings of selected texts—ranging from eco-literature like The Overstory and Flight Behavior to speculative fiction such as Klara and the Sun and The Lifecycle of Software Objects—the paper investigates how literature challenges anthropocentric paradigms and redefines ethical and narrative boundaries. These texts do not simply depict non-human entities as metaphors or background scenery but as co-constitutive actors with affective, cognitive, and political capacities. By foregrounding these non-human agents, literature participates in a broader cultural and philosophical shift toward a posthuman understanding of subjectivity, entanglement, and narrative authority. Ultimately, the paper argues that contemporary literature becomes a vital site for reimagining human-nonhuman relations in the face of planetary transformation.

Posthumanism, Non-human Agency, Eco-literature, Artificial Intelligence, Animal Studies, New Materialism, Narrative Theory, Anthropocene, Subjectivity, Ethics in Literature.

1. Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, 2010. ( p. xvi and p. 13) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013. (pp. 56–58, 89, 111) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Calarco, Matthew. Thinking through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction. Stanford University Press, 2015. (pp. 34–36) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Coeckelbergh, Mark. AI Ethics. The MIT Press, 2020. (pp. 57–59, 81–82) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Danielewski, Mark Z. House of Leaves. Pantheon Books, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Descola, Philippe. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by Janet Lloyd, University of Chicago Press, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fowler, Karen Joy. We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 2013. (pp. 205–207) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Giraud, Eva. What Comes After Entanglement? Activism, Anthropocentrism, and an Ethics of Exclusion. Duke University Press, 2019. (pp. 91–92) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grusin, Richard, editor. The Nonhuman Turn. University of Minnesota Press, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, 2016. (pp. 1–2, 100–103) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Haraway, Donna J. When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, 2008. (pp. 15–16) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999. (pp. 2–3, 112–115, 288) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hayles, N. Katherine. Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. University of Chicago Press, 2017. (pp. 63–65) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ishiguro, Kazuo. Klara and the Sun. Knopf, 2021. (pp. 134, 178) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter, Harvard University Press, 1993. (pp. 10–11) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Morton, Timothy. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Harvard University Press, 2007. (pp. 92, 125) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morton, Timothy. The Ecological Thought. Harvard University Press, 2010.(pp. 39–40) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review, vol. 83, no. 4, 1974, pp. 435–450 & pp. 437–438) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Powers, Richard. The Overstory. W.W. Norton, 2018. (pp. 135, 150–152) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Serres, Michel. The Parasite. Translated by Lawrence R. Schehr, University of Minnesota Press, 2007. (pp. 11–12, 83) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press, 2015. (pp. 1–2, 22–24) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vint, Sherryl. Animal Alterity: Science Fiction and the Question of the Animal. Liverpool University Press, 2010.(pp. 43–45) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wolfe, Cary. What Is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press, 2010.(pp. xv–xvii, 57–60, 98–99) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wolfe, Cary, editor. Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal. University of Minnesota Press, 2003. (pp. 6–9) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Culture: The (In) Human Engagement with Nature
• Identity Crisis in Orhan Pamuk’s The Black Book: A Critical Interpretation
• Metaphor in Pop-Up Swahili Sayings: Is it a New Meaning or a New Idea?
• Racial Identity and Ecological Belonging in Toni Morrison’s Beloved: A Study through Social Identity Theory and Eco-Race Theory