Understanding the Policy-Performance Nexus in Sierra Leone’s Energy Sector: Toward a New Framework for Service Delivery

Sierra Leone’s energy sector has long been constrained by limited access, weak governance, and dependence on donor-funded interventions. Despite ambitious policies and reforms, service delivery outcomes remained poor. This study investigated the policy–performance nexus to understand why ambitious policies often fail to translate into reliable, affordable, and sustainable electricity services. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative household surveys (with a 95% response rate) with qualitative key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and secondary data analysis. This design enabled triangulation of findings across citizen perceptions, institutional perspectives, and policy documents. The findings indicated that energy policies in Sierra Leone were ambitious but undermined by weak implementation, corruption, political interference, and utility inefficiencies. Quantitative results showed that most households perceived electricity as unaffordable, unreliable, and unfairly distributed. Qualitative insights revealed governance deficits, including illegal connections, opaque billing systems, and weak regulatory enforcement. Donor-funded renewable energy projects were found to be unsustainable when community ownership, integration, and capacity-building were absent. The study concluded that Sierra Leone’s energy sector challenges were not due to a lack of policy ambition but to systemic governance and institutional weaknesses. To bridge the gap between policy and performance, a hybrid framework was proposed, emphasising strong governance, financial sustainability, renewable energy expansion, and community inclusion. This framework offers lessons for policymakers, donors, and regional stakeholders on advancing resilient and inclusive energy systems in fragile contexts.

Energy policy; Energy governance; Renewable energy; Sierra Leone; Policy - Performance nexus

1. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2022). African economic outlook 2022: Supporting climate resilience and a just energy transition in Africa. AfDB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2022). West Africa economic outlook 2022: Supporting a resilient recovery. AfDB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2023). African economic outlook 2023: Mobilising private sector financing for climate and green growth in Africa. AfDB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2023). African economic outlook: Sierra Leone 2023. AfDB. https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/west-africa/sierra-leone [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2020). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 45(2), 147–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eberhard, A., & Gratwick, K. (2021). Power-sector reform and regulation in Africa. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. ECOWAS. (2022). West African Power Pool: Regional electricity market development report. ECOWAS Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Geels, F. W. (2021). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 365–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Africa energy outlook 2023. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2021). Humanising sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework. Applied Energy, 281, 116117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kumi, E. N. (2021). The electricity situation in Ghana: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 149, 112017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Matland, R. E. (2021). Synthesizing the implementation literature: Ambiguity–conflict model revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 301–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Meadowcroft, J., & Florini, A. (2021). Global energy transitions and the future of energy governance. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Miller, G. J. (2020). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Morgan, D. L. (2020). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819898591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211058707 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Odarno, L., Sawe, E., & Sweeney, S. (2020). A systems approach to energy access: Africa’s power sector challenges. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/research/systems-approach-energy-access [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pereira, A. O., Silva, L. A., & Andrade, J. A. (2022). Hydropower vulnerability in Latin America under climate change scenarios. Energy Reports, 8, 2219–2231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Peters, B. G. (2022). The politics of policy capacity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895615.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sovacool, B. K., & Griffiths, S. (2020). The cultural barriers to renewable energy and energy efficiency in the Middle East. Energy Policy, 140, 111426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sovacool, B. K., Turnheim, B., Hook, A., Brock, A., & Martiskainen, M. (2021). Aligning SDG 7 with a just transition: Policy challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 156, 112476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. DHHS. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. World Bank. (2023). Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report 2023. World Bank, IEA, IRENA, UNSD, WHO. https://trackingsdg7.esmap.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria