Integrated Approaches to Water Quality and Resource Resilience: Advances in Hydrology, Treatment, and Climate Adaptation
Authors
Department of Civil Engineering, Kwara State University, Malete (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900046
Subject Category: Engineering & Technology
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 460-470
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-19
Accepted: 2025-09-25
Published: 2025-10-15
Abstract
Water resources are being subjected to unprecedented pressure due to population growth, urbanization, industries, intensive farming and the increasing effects of global warming. These stressors are compromising the quality and quantity of freshwater resources, escalating threats to human health, life forms, and to socio-economic conditions. Traditional methods that consider hydrology, water quality, treatment technologies, and resilience planning as stand-alone areas are increasingly less sufficient, since the development of one area is often reliant on the development of the others. The present review synthesizes the recent studies that were published within 2014-2025 in four interconnected pillars, namely: hydrological modelling and climate effects study, water quality and transport of contaminants, water and wastewater treatment innovations, and integrated management through resilience. The usefulness of integrated approaches is demonstrated in case studies conducted in different areas such as Singapore, the Netherlands, California, and Africa, among others. The review finds conclusively that combined solutions are the key to sustainable and resilient water future, because only integrated development in the fields of hydrology, treatment, and resilience will guarantee water security in the environment of growing uncertainty.
Keywords
Water quality, Hydrology, Wastewater treatment, Climate adaptation, Water resilience, Integrated approaches
Downloads
References
1. Al-Hashimi, O.H., Sillanpää, M. & Aho, M. (2021) Microplastics in aquatic systems: Sources, transport, fate and remediation. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112783. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Andreadis, K.M. & Clark, E.A. (2023) Satellite data for hydrological applications: Advances and challenges. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(2), 221–240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Behrangi, A., Gardner, A.S. & Bolch, T. (2020) Impacts of climate change on precipitation extremes and hydrology. Climate Dynamics, 55, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Biswal, B. & Balasubramanian, R. (2022) Nature-based solutions for sustainable stormwater management. Environmental Research Letters, 17, 064021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bradley, P.M., Kolpin, D.W. & Focazio, M.J. (2024) Emerging contaminants in groundwater: Trends, treatment and future outlook. Science of the Total Environment, 903, 166972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Brown, C., Ghile, Y., Laverty, M. & Li, K. (2015) Decision scaling: Linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. Water Resources Research, 51(6), 4147–4167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Butler, D. (2018) Urban wastewater systems: Current practices and future challenges. Water Science & Technology, 77(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chellam, S. (2025) Advances in chemical oxidation for water disinfection and contaminant removal. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 61, 104186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chu, H. (2022) Governance challenges in integrated water resources management. Water International, 47(3), 377–392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Condon, L.E., Atchley, A.L. & Maxwell, R.M. (2021) Evapotranspiration deconstructed: How water and energy fluxes respond to climate drivers. Water Resources Research, 57(8), e2020WR029121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dai, Z. (2020) Pharmaceutical residues in aquatic environments: Occurrence and treatment technologies. Environmental Pollution, 261, 114200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Edwards, P. (2024) Resilience in urban water management: Policy and practice. Urban Water Journal, 21(2), 87–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gude, V.G. (2015) Energy and water autarky of wastewater treatment and power generation systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gupta, H., Chen, Y. & Li, X. (2024) Machine learning approaches for hydrological prediction under climate uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources, 187, 104378. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hagen, E. (2022) Socio-ecological resilience in water management: Barriers and pathways. Ecological Economics, 194, 107345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hathaway, J. (2017) Green infrastructure for stormwater management in urban environments. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 3(4), 04017007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hoff, H. (2011) Understanding the Nexus: Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Islam, M.R., Rahman, M. & Zhang, Y. (2025) Artificial intelligence in hydrology: Advances and applications. Journal of Hydrology, 622, 129024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kumar, P., Sivapalan, M. & Singh, V.P. (2023) Hydrological science in the Anthropocene: Towards integration and resilience. Water Resources Research, 59(5), e2022WR032118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Konar, M., Troy, T.J. & Singh, R. (2024) Water security in a changing climate: Integrated approaches. Nature Water, 2, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lanzarini-Lopes, M., Zhang, T.C. & Alvarez, P.J. (2021) Nanotechnology for water and wastewater treatment: Opportunities and risks. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(2), 1040–1056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ma, J. (2022) Treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Current technologies and future directions. Chemosphere, 307, 136129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. McIntosh, J., Zeng, R. & Maxwell, R.M. (2023) Coupled groundwater–surface water models for integrated water management. Hydrological Processes, 37(4), e14925. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. McKay, J. (2024) Community engagement and legitimacy in water resilience planning. Water Policy, 26(1), 32–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Moe, C. (2023) Economic perspectives on sustainable water reuse. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 194, 106736. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact Of UI/UX Design on User Trust and Task Completion in Civic Tech Platforms
- Solar Cell Photovoltaic Model Shell Sp 75
- Development of an Intelligent Traffic Management System to Address Visibility Obstruction at Urban Intersections: A Case Study of Ibadan Metropolis
- Optimum Placement of Facts Devices on an Interconnected Power Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimisation Technique
- Assessing Construction Transformation and Implication on Future Production Flow System