Floral Diversity of Aquatic Macrophytes in Two Water Bodies in Ekiti State, Nigeria.
Authors
Department of Zoology, Ekiti State University, P.M.B.5363, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Department of Zoology, Ekiti State University, P.M.B.5363, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Department of Zoology, Ekiti State University, P.M.B.5363, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Dept. of Statistics, Ekiti State University, P.M.B.5363, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Department of Zoology, Ekiti State University, P.M.B.5363, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900070
Subject Category: Environment
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 700-708
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-11
Accepted: 2025-09-18
Published: 2025-10-17
Abstract
This study was aimed at investigating the macrophytes composition and species diversity of Rivers Osun and Elemi, located at Ikere and Ado- Ekiti, respectively. Macrophyte samples were collected from both rivers between between the months of May to October, 2023. Nineteen (19) species of macrophytes were collected from each of the two rivers. Osun River had a total number of 730 macrophytes with a percentage relative abundance of 48% while Elemi River had a total number of 794 macrophytes with a percentage relative abundance of 52%. In River Osun, Solenastemon monostachyus was the most abundant (145) and had the highest percentage relative abundance of 19.86% while Coix larcryma-jobi was the least abundant (8) species with a percentage relative abundance of 1.01%. In Elemi River, Alternanthera brasiliana was the most abundant (212) macrophytes species with a percentage abundance of 26.70% while Lepistemon owarianse was the least abundant (7) species with a percentage relative abundance of 0.88%. The diversity indices showed that macrophytes at River Elemi had the highest diversity index (H’= 3.48) and species richness (d = 2.73). It was also noted that macrophyte at River Elemi had the highest evenness index (E’= 1.18). This study also revealed that macrophytes at River Osun had the highest Menhinick index (MH = 0.70) and Simpson index (1-D = 0.91). The dominant macrophytes in both study areas are pollution-tolerant species, and the rivers have been impacted by nutrient enrichment. Hence, both rivers should be adequately monitored and measures put in place to checkmate further enrichment and prevent pollution as macrophytes have been obersved to play significant roles in community-based conservation strategies, effluent control, and policy implications for freshwater biodiversity conservation.
Keywords
Diversity, Abundance, Macrophytes, River Elemi, River Osun.
Downloads
References
1. Lacoul P, Freedman B. (2016). Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Rev. 14:89-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Linder, H.P., Lehmann, C. E., Archibald, S., Osborne, C. P.,& Richardson, D.M. (2018). Global grass (Poaceae) success underpinned by traits facilitating colonization, persistence and habitat transformation. Biological Reviews. 93(2), 1125-1144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aloke, S., Pronoy, M., Koyel, R., Koushik, S. and Tanmay, S. (2022). A review on phyto-remediation by aquatic macrophytes: A natural promising tool for sustainable management of ecosystem. Int. J. Exp. Res., Vol. 27: 9-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Annelise G., Carina J.C., Carina V.G., and Rene G. (2004). Easy Identification of Aquatic Plants: a guide for the identification of water plants Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South-African National Botanical Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Devlin, R.M. (2017). Plant Physiology. Reinhold, New York. pp564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dvorak J. (2016). An example of relationship between macrophytes, macro invertebrates and their food resources in a shallow eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia. 339:27-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Goswami, G., Pal, S., and Palit D. (2014). Studies on the physico-chemical characteristics, macrophyte diversity and economic prospect in Rajmata Dighi: a wetland in Cooch Behar Distict, West Bengal, India. NeBio 1 (3), 21-27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. lake contamination by accumulation of trace elements in selected aquatic macrophytes: a case study of Kanewal Community Reserve, Gujarat, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Madsen, J.D. (2019). Impact of invasive aquatic plants on aquatic biology. In: Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook, edited by LA Gettys, WTHaller and M Bellaud. pp1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. McQueen, D.J, Post, J.R, Mills, E.L. (2016). Trophic relationship in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 43:1571-1581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Nedungadi, P., Raman, R., and McGregor, M. (2013, October). Enhanced STEM learning with Online Labs: Empirical study comparing physical labs, tablets and desktops. In Frontiers in Education Conference 1585- 1590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nirmal K. J.I., Soni, H., Kumar, R.N., (2008). Evaluation of biomonitoring approach to study [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Obot, E.A. and J.S.O. Ayeni, 1987. A Handbook of Common Aquatic Plants of the Kainji Lake Basin, Nigeria. Kainji Lake Research Institute/Saolog Printing Production, Ilorin, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Pelicice F.M, Thomas SM, Agostinhno AA. (2018). Simple relationships to predict attributes of fish assemblages in patches of submerged macrophytes. Neotrop Ichthyol. 6 (4): 543-550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Roka, D. (2019). Seasonal variation of Macrophytes and Phytoplankton Diversity at Shoreline of Beeshazar Lake, Chitwan, Central Nepal. M.Sc. Dissertation submitted to Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rui, L., Qiujin, X., Sheng, Z.G., Ying, C.X., & Sai, B. (2013). Effects of various total dissolved solids (TDS) on the growth of Phytoplankton. Research on Environmental Sciences, 26(4), 1072-1078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Seenivasagan, R., Karthika, A., Kalidoss, R., & Malik, J. A. (2022). Bioremediation of Polluted Aquatic Ecosystems Using Macrophytes. In Advances in Bioremediation and Phytoremediation for Sustainable Soil Management: Principles, Monitoring and Remediation (pp. 57-79). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89984-4_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Sharma, R.C., & Singh, S.(2017). Macrophytes of Sacred Himalayan Lake Dodi Tal, India: Quantitative and Diversity Analysis. Biodiversity International Journal 1(4), 137-144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Solak C.N, Barinova S, Acs E, Dayioglu H. (2012). Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turky. Turkish Journal of Botany. 36:191- 203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Wetzel, R. G. (2018). Limnology: Lake and River Ecosytem. Academic San Diego, California, U.S.A. 234Pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
- Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
- Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
- Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area