AI-Driven Quality Assurance Framework for Inclusive Government and E-Commerce Web Services: Integrating Accessibility, Usability, and Emerging Technologies

In today’s digital ecosystem, ensuring the accessibility and inclusivity of online platforms is a cornerstone of quality assurance (QA). This study proposes an integrated, AI-driven QA framework that bridges usability, accessibility, and emerging technologies for government and e-commerce web services. By aligning QA practices with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1) and ISO/IEC 25010 standards, this research emphasizes inclusive design that accommodates users of diverse abilities and contexts. The framework incorporates both functional and non-functional parameters, such as performance, security, readability, mobile responsiveness, and user experience within a systematic testing process. Advanced technologies like machine learning, automated accessibility validation tools, and big data analytics are leveraged to predict and mitigate potential usability barriers. The study highlights how integrating AI-powered analytics can enhance compliance, personalization, and efficiency across platforms. The outcomes aim to guide policymakers, developers, and QA practitioners in creating user-centric, equitable, and trustworthy web environments that support the goals of Digital India and global digital inclusion initiatives.

Quality Assurance, Accessibility, WCAG, Usability.

1. “Government to set up botnet cleaning centres”, Preview Tech, 25 May 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://censusindia.gov.in/Census_And_You/disabled_population.aspx. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Acosta, B., Zalakeviciute, R., Alexandrino, K., Pérez-Medina, J., Rybarczyk, Y., & Gonzalez, M. (2020). Accessibility Assessment of Mobile Meteorological Applications for Users with Low Vision. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction, 199-205. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2012). Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. W3C. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests (2nd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Balfagih, Z., Mohamed, N., & Mahmud, M. (2012). A framework for quality assurance of electronic commerce websites. E Commerce, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ferreira, R., & Monteiro, E. (2022). Evaluating the impact of website loading speed on user behavior in e-commerce. Journal of Internet Commerce, 21(3), 205–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Wang, C., & Zhou, X. (2023). Personalization and its effect on e-commerce usability: A machine learning approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 1123–1145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hassan, M. A., & Sulaiman, H. (2021). Comparative analysis of mobile and desktop e-commerce website usability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(13), 1325–1341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Demirkan, H., & Delen, D. (2020). Leveraging big data for customer-centric QA in digital commerce. Decision Support Systems, 135, 113326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yadav, R., & Singh, S. (2024). Evaluating the role of cognitive load in e-commerce navigation design. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 14(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Alzahrani, L., & Goodwin, R. (2022). Cultural dimensions and e-commerce usability: A cross-country investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tan, J., & Lim, S. (2021). The role of emotional design in enhancing e-commerce user experience. Interacting with Computers, 33(4), 412–431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Patel, D., & Sharma, P. (2023). Integration of voice search in e-commerce websites: Usability challenges and recommendations. Computers in Industry, 145, 103824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Okeke, F. C., & Badu, A. (2020). Evaluating security as a dimension of e-commerce quality: A user perception study. Information & Computer Security, 28(3), 491–507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nguyen, T., & Park, H. (2023). Evaluating the effect of progressive web applications (PWA) on mobile e-commerce usability. Mobile Information Systems, 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kumar, A., & Srinivasan, R. (2021). Trust and satisfaction in e-commerce: A structural equation modeling approach. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(4), 891–910. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhang, M., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2023). Predicting website usability with machine learning: A user-centric approach. ACM Transactions on the Web, 17(2), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ahmed, N., & Hossain, M. (2022). Accessibility compliance in e-commerce websites: A WCAG 2.1 evaluation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(4), 789–804. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lin, F., & Chen, C. (2020). A comparative analysis of A/B and multivariate testing in UX optimization. Journal of Digital Innovation, 6(2), 88–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Salim, M., & Alshammari, F. (2024). A hybrid quality assurance model for e-commerce: Integrating ISO/IEC 25010 and user feedback. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(1), 113–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ferreira, A., Silva, P., & Gomes, T. (2022). Analyzing user feedback for enhancing e-commerce website quality. Online Information Review, 46(7), 1214–1235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Liu, Y., Zhao, K., & Wang, J. (2023). UX metrics and success indicators for e-commerce websites. Human–Computer Interaction, 38(1), 59–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Enhancing user experience through AI-powered design in e-commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gupta, V., Kaur, P., & Singh, H. (2024). Bi-level Decision Tree Approach for Web Quality Assessment. IEEE Access. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Gupta, V., Singh, H., & Kaur, P. (2024). Accessibility Evaluation of Hospital Websites in India. International Journal of Computer Applications & Information Technology, 14(2), 476-484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Gupta, V., & Singh, H. (2021, March). Web Content Accessibility Evaluation of Universities' Websites-A Case Study for Universities of Punjab State in India. In 2021 8th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (pp. 546-550). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet